Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5523_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
9  •  Orthodontics I: Development, Assessment and Treatment Planning
247
dento-alveolar compensation for the class III skeletal discrepancy.

SHORT NOTE ANSWERS

1. Angle’s classification is used nowadays to classify the anteroposterior molar relationship, although it was originally intended for classification of the anteroposte­rior dental arch relationship on the assumption that the first permanent molar erupted into a consistently reli­able position in the face. Three molar relationships exist: Class I: mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first permanent
molar occludes in the buccal groove of the lower first permanent molar.
Class II: mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first permanent
molar occludes anterior to a class I relationship.
Class III: mesiobuccal cusp of the upper first permanent
molar occludes posterior to a class I relationship.
2. This records occlusal features of a malocclusion using a MOCDO convention where M is missing teeth, O is overjet, C is crossbite, D is displacement of contact points and O is overbite. A specially designed ruler aids the process. A malocclusion is then ascribed to one of five categories of treatment need: Grades 1, 2, no/ slight need; grade 3, borderline; grades 4, 5, great/very great need. Assessment by this means is objective, reliable and rapid.
3. This scores the need for treatment of a malocclusion based on the degree of aesthetic impairment of the an­terior teeth. Assessment is made by viewing the anterior occlusion either clinically or from study models and comparing this with a set of 10 photographs of increas­ing aesthetic handicap. Treatment need is accorded as: grades 1–4, no/slight need; grades 5–7, borderline need; grades 8–10, definite need. The set of photographs does not include a full range of malocclusion types and as­sessment is subjective.
4. Space may be created by each of the following means:
a. Arch expansion: only indicated where a unilateral
crossbite exists, especially if there is an associated displacement.
b. Distal movement of the buccal segments: may be
undertaken in the lower arch if extraction of a lower second permanent molar is considered, but rarely adopted as an approach to relief of crowding. If un­dertaken, a fixed appliance is invariably required. In the upper arch, bilateral distal movement of the buc­cal segments using headgear may be undertaken to provide space for relief of mild upper arch crowding or correction of a small overjet. In these patients, the lower arch should be well aligned and the molar rela­tionship no greater than half unit class II. Unilateral distal movement may be undertaken when space is required on one side of the arch only and may be undertaken using a screw section in a removable ap­pliance, although provision for incorporation of headgear in the appliance is advisable. To remove the need for headgear use, a TAD may be used instead in combination with a fixed appliance to bring about the desired movement. Consider extraction of upper second permanent molar(s) to aid distal movement in
the upper arch provided third molars are present and of good size and position.
c. Interdental stripping: only really a consideration in
adults where a small amount of space is required for alignment. Usually confined to the lower labial seg­ment. Involves the removal of ,0.25 mm from the mesial and distal surfaces of each tooth.
d. Any combination of above.

VIVA ANSWERS

1. The potential benefits of orthodontic treatment to the patient should outweigh the potential risks and side­effects.
The potential benefits of orthodontic treatment are quite
limited. The relationship between dental caries and malocclusion is unproven. Periodontal health can be improved by orthodontic treatment of occlusal rela­tionships traumatising the periodontal tissues, e.g. a traumatic overbite or incisor crossbite with mandibu­lar displacement leading to mobility with/without gingival recession of a lower incisor. Where an im­pacted tooth is removed, the resorption risk to the associated teeth is reduced; the risk of incisor trauma may be reduced by overjet correction but the benefits of early intervention indicate no significant gains in this regard. Although TMD has been shown to be as­sociated with crossbites, anterior open bite, class II due to mandibular retrusion and asymmetry, this is weak. Orthodontic treatment cannot be guaranteed to cure TMD. There are psychological benefits accru­ing from correction of increased overjet or anterior spacing which include improved self-concept and less negative experiences.
The potential risks are failure to achieve the aims of treat-
ment; pulpal, gingival and mucosal damage; root re­sorption and loss of alveolar crestal height; and possibly instigation or exacerbation of temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome (see Section 9.4). With fixed ap­pliances, the risk of decalcification is increased while there is a small but significant risk of facial or ocular damage from headgear.
The need for treatment may be assessed using the Index of
Orthodontic Treatment Need (see Section 9.2). This has two components, but the dental health rather than the aesthetic component can only be assessed reliably.
2. In the average primary dentition at age 5 years, abcde have erupted in all quadrants. Although the ‘ideal’ features have been described as a generalised spaced dentition with specific space mesial to the upper and distal to the lower cs (anthropoid spaces), upright inci­sors with a relatively deep overbite and flush terminal planes, these rarely occur and great individual variation is encountered.
Where the overbite has been deep initially, it usually re-
duces by 5 years of age, and an edge-to-edge incisor relationship with attrition is common. From about age 6 years onwards, the permanent dentition starts to erupt, usually commencing with the eruption of the lower incisors or of the lower first permanent molars as growth posteriorly in the arch accommodates them. As the permanent incisors erupt lingual to their
248
Master Dentistry
predecessors, some incisor crowding is often seen, but this generally resolves with growth in the intercanine width.
Order and dates of eruption of permanent teeth are given in
Tables 7.1 and 7.2 (Chapter 7, p. 194).
Space for the upper incisors is provided by the primary inci-
sor spacing, intercanine growth (1–2 mm in the pri­mary and ,3 mm in the mixed dentition) and the more proclined inclination of the permanent incisors. Com­monly, these teeth erupt spaced and distally inclined but the spacing reduces as the permanent ca­nines erupt. These should be palpable in the buccal sul­cus at age 10 years and are guided into position by the roots of the permanent lateral incisors.
Space for the premolars and permanent canines is provided
by intercanine growth and the ‘leeway space’, typically 1–1.5 mm and 2–2.5 mm in the upper and lower arches, respectively. The greater space in the lower than in the upper arch also may allow the molar relationship to correct from a possible half a unit class II to a class I relationship.
By 14 years of age, the permanent occlusion should be all
but complete apart from third molars, if present. The six features of a good (‘ideal’) permanent occlusion are given in Section 9.1.
3. All the points listed below should be gone through in a systematic order in a format that is understandable to the patient, with adequate time given to question any item that is not entirely clear.
a. The diagnosis (problem list) should be outlined to the
patient and/or parent together with the dental health component of IOTN. The significance of the latter should be explained.
b. If there is more than one possible approach to treat-
ment, the various options should be explained to­gether with the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of each. If there are risks attached to undertaking no treatment, this must be explained also.
c. Appliances to be used for treatment must be explained
and examples demonstrated – colour photographs are a good means of doing this. If headgear is required,
this requires special consideration together with an explanation of the specific care required in its use. If a TAD is to be used, this should also be explained.
d. Likely treatment intervals and an estimate of treat-
ment length should be given.
e. The compliance required from the patient during orth-
odontic treatment must also be emphasised: the need for maintenance of a high standard of oral hygiene; regular dental attendance for routine dental care; co­operation required with appliance wear, particularly if headgear or intraoral elastic wear is prescribed; and importance of attendance for appliance adjustment at the appointed times. The retention regimen and its importance should also be explained.
f. Importance of risks of each treatment plan (i.e. root
resorption, decalcification, alveolar bone loss, relapse potential) should be explained to the patient and par­ent/guardian, taking care not to dramatise sequelae, which are likely to be minor.
g. An information sheet may be useful for the patient to
take away to think over all the issues related to treatment prior to giving consent for treatment at a subsequent visit.

SINGLE BEST ANSWER QUESTION ANSWERS

Question 1: D Question 2: E Question 3: A. Question 4: C. Question 5: D. Question 6: E Question 7: A Question 8: C Question 9: B Question 10: D Question 11: C Question 12: D Question 13: C Question 14: B
10

Orthodontics II: Management of Occlusal Problems

CHAPTER OUTLINE
Overview‚ 249
10.1 Problem Solving in the Developing Dentition‚ 249
10.2 Class I Malocclusion‚ 257
10.3 Class II Malocclusion‚ 258
10.4 Class III Malocclusion‚ 262

Overview

The management of malocclusion comprises a substantial part of orthodontic practice. It ranges from interception of developing occlusal problems through to comprehensive correction of established malocclusion in the adolescent or adult. It also encompasses the special requirements in orthodontic care of those with cleft lip and/or palate.
This chapter describes the management of the develop­ing dentition and of all major anomalies of established malocclusion, including surgical correction. The occlusal problems particular to cleft lip and/or palate together with their management are also outlined.
10.5 Open Bite and Crossbite‚ 264
10.6 Adult and Surgical–Orthodontic Treatment‚ 267
10.7 Cleft Lip and Palate‚ 270
Self-Assessment: Questions‚ 272 Self-Assessment: Answers‚ 277

ANOMALIES OF ERUPTION AND EXFOLIATION

Both eruption and exfoliation of primary and permanent teeth may be premature or delayed.
Natal Teeth
Natal teeth are usually lower incisors that are erupted at birth or appear soon after. Removal is indicated only if they interfere with suckling or if they are so mobile as to be at risk of inhalation.
Eruption of Teeth
Other than natal teeth, the following points should be borne in mind:

10.1 Problem Solving in the Developing Dentition

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You should:
• know the problems which are best dealt with in the
developing dentition
• be able to classify supernumerary teeth
• know how to localise an unerupted tooth in the anterior
maxilla
• understand the principles of management of an
unerupted 1, ectopic 3 and first permanent molar with poor long-term prognosis.
Although most orthodontic treatment is undertaken when the permanent dentition is established, some aspects of the developing occlusion may be better dealt with in the mixed dentition. Such interception may eliminate the need for, or simplify, later treatment. Systematic and regular screening of the developing dentition is essential to this process.
n
There is greater variation in the eruption sequence of primary teeth between races than there is in eruption times.
n
Poor diet and chronic ill-health in child populations may alter eruption sequence.
n
Permanent teeth tend to erupt later in White European people compared to people of East and South East Asia, who in turn tend to have later eruption times than Black Central and Southern African people.
n
Females tend to erupt their permanent teeth earlier than males, particularly second and third molars.
Factors causing premature exfoliation or delay in the eruption and exfoliation of primary or permanent teeth are given in Table 10.1.
To ensure that any deviation in the typical eruption sequence is detected early, clinical vigilance is required dur­ing the developing dentition, supported by radiographic investigations where necessary. Particular attention should be given to the permanent maxillary incisors and canines, as early recognition of an anomaly in their eruption improves the prognosis.
249
250
Master Dentistry
Table 10.1 Causes of Premature or Delayed Eruption of Primary or Permanent Teeth.
Causes
Premature eruption
Delayed eruption
Premature exfoliation
Delayed exfoliation
Familial tendency Primary dentition: high birthweight Permanent dentition: early-onset puberty, excess growth or thyroid hormone secretion
Primary dentition: very low birthweight, premature birth General causes: Down or Turner syndromes, severe nutritional deficiency, hypothyroidism/ hypopituita­rism, cleidocranial dysplasia, hereditary gingival hyperplasia, cleft lip and palate Local causes: ectopic crypt position, supernumerary or odontome, developmental absence, retention of primary tooth, dilaceration, primary failure of erup­tion, crowding
Commonly caries or trauma Rarely hereditary hypophosphatasia, developmental neutropenia, cyclic neutropenia, Chediak–Higashi syndrome, histiocytosis X
Developmental absence of permanent successor Ectopic position of permanent successor Trauma Severe periradicular infection of primary tooth
Hypodontia
The most common missing teeth are:
n
third molars (25–35%)
n
upper lateral incisors (2%)
n
lower second premolars (3%)
n
lower incisors (0.5%).
Hypodontia affects females more than males with a ratio of 3:2 and depending on the number of developmentally absent teeth, excluding third molars, may be classified as mild (1 or 2), moderate (3 – 6) or severe (greater than 6). The aetiology may be non-syndromic or syndromic, the former arising from a multifactorial interplay of environ­mental (systemic and local) and genetic (MSX1, PAX9, AXIN2) factors. Premolar and molar agenesis is related mostly to alterations in MSX1 and PAX9 respectively, whereas agenesis affecting several tooth types is linked to changes in AXIN2. With over a hundred syndromes associ­ated with hypodontia, some of the more common are cleft lip and/or palate where almost 75% may be affected, Down syndrome, Ehlers–Danlos syndrome and ectodermal dysplasia. Additional dental features commonly found in­clude microdontia, hypoplastic enamel, abnormal crown shape, infraoccluded primary molars and ectopic maxillary canines. Lower face height is also often reduced with an increase in overbite.
Absent Third Molars
Extraction of a second molar, either to facilitate distal movement of the upper buccal segments or to relieve poste­rior crowding, should not be considered in the absence of a third molar. These start to calcify any time between 8 and 14 years.
Absent Upper Lateral Incisors
Management options for the space created by absent upper lateral incisors are:
n
space opening
n
space maintenance
n
space closure.
The final decision depends on:
n
the patient’s attitude to orthodontic treatment
n
the anteroposterior and vertical skeletal relationships
n
amount of exposure of the upper canines and incisors on smiling
n
the colour, size, shape and inclination of the canine and incisor teeth
n
whether the arches are spaced or crowded
n
the buccal segment occlusion.
The possible plans are best assessed by carrying out a trial set-up of each on duplicate study models, followed by joint consultation with a restorative colleague.
space opening. In uncrowded or mildly crowded arches,
when the buccal segment occlusion is class I or, at most, half unit class II, or in class III where proclination of the incisors is likely to correct an anterior crossbite, space opening is best. In addition, in patients with low Frank­fort-mandibular plane angle (FMPA) or where the maxil­lary canine is considerably darker than the incisors, it may be best to open rather than close the anterior spaces. A fixed appliance is required to localise space for the miss­ing units, followed by at least 3–6 months of removable appliance retention ensuring that the space is maintained by placing wire spurs in contact with the adjoining teeth in addition to prosthetic tooth replacements. Where arti­ficial teeth are added to a vacuum-formed retainer rather than to a Hawley retainer, the former must not be worn while eating or drinking. In selected cases, autotrans­plantation of lower premolars (extracted for relief of crowding) to the upper lateral incisor area may be possi­ble but this may be difficult due to relative crown size differences. Rarely has a lower incisor been autotrans­planted to an upper lateral incisor space but only if a satisfactory occlusal outcome is likely. More commonly, the missing units may be replaced on resin-retained bridgework, and occasionally by implants at a later date provided in the latter case that there is adequate width and height of alveolar bone along with root parallelism of the abutment teeth. If bridge work is planned, it is im­portant to ensure that sufficient interocclusal clearance exists or has been created during appliance therapy for placement of the metal framework or for the pontic in the case of an implant. In the short term of 3–5 years, suc­cess rates of 85% and 95% have been reported with resin-bonded bridges and single-tooth implant-supported prostheses, respectively.
space closure. In crowded mouths, early extraction of the
primary canines should be carried out to encourage mesial drift of the posterior teeth, but a later phase of fixed appli­ance therapy is usually needed to align and approximate the upper anterior teeth, followed by bonded retention. Re­contouring of the canines in addition to composite build-up of their mesio-incisal aspects is advisable before treatment
10  •  Orthodontics II: Management of Occlusal Problems
251
starts to assist with definitive tooth positioning; final resto­rations are placed following appliance removal. Bleaching of the canines may also be required to enhance aesthetics. Overjet reduction by space closure may be more favourable than resorting to midarch extractions and space opening. Space closure is likely to be facilitated in patients with increased FMPA, crowding and where the buccal segment relationship is a full unit class II.
Absent Second Premolars
The primary second molar should preferably be retained where the arch is uncrowded or aligned. Prospects are good long term if they survive to 20 years of age. If the tooth starts to infraocclude, an occlusal onlay may be placed to maintain it in function. Removal of the lower second primary molar shortly after eruption of the lateral incisors will encourage spontaneous space closure in mildly crowded cases; in those with marked crowding, its extraction should be delayed until orthodontic treatment commences so that the resulting space may be used for arch alignment. Where it is necessary to extract the second primary molar and the resultant space is substantial, ad­ditional anchorage will need to be considered to move the lower molars forward without the lower labial segment being moved lingually. Alternatively acceptance of the space as it is out of sight and if not compromising occlusal function may be a possibility. In the upper arch, extraction of the second primary molar is best deferred until orth­odontic treatment is about to start. Rarely, a lower second premolar develops late and necessitates an alteration in the original treatment plan.
Absent Lower Central Incisors
In the absence of permanent lower central incisors, root re­sorption and progressive incisal wear may lead to loss of the primary incisors in the late mixed dentition, although occa­sionally they can last longer. With one absent lower incisor, space closure is likely to increase the overjet and overbite, fa­vourable where these are minimal and for correction of a class III incisor relationship; space opening is normally prefer­able in class II cases. Where both lower central incisors are absent, confining spacing to the lateral incisor areas is usually better due to the favourable characteristics afforded by the lower canines to support resin-retained bridgework.
Supernumerary Teeth
Teeth additional to the usual number are termed ‘supernu­merary’. Most common in the anterior maxilla (80%), they may occur between the central incisors (mesiodens) but often also develop distal to the last tooth in each dental se­ries (lateral incisor, second premolar and third molar) as an exuberant growth of the dental lamina. The exact aetiology is not known but it seems genetic factors play a part. They are more common:
n
in males than in females (relative reported frequency approximately 2:1 in White European populations)
n
in the permanent than in the primary dentition (respec­tive incidences around 2% and 1%)
n
in children with cleft of the lip and alveolus, cleidocra­nial dysplasia and Gardner syndrome.
Those in the anterior maxilla can be categorised into
three groups: conical, tuberculate and supplemental.
Conical Teeth
Conical teeth occur between the upper permanent central incisors; they are often singular but can sometimes occur in combination with others of similar form. They may have no effect if they are well above the apices of the incisors. If there is no risk of damage to adjacent teeth with tooth movement, they can be left in place and observed. Often, however, they may displace the adjacent teeth, perhaps creating a large diastema, or they may delay eruption. In these instances, removal is indicated. Occasionally, a coni­cal supernumerary tooth erupts and can be extracted.
Tuberculate Teeth
Tuberculate teeth are the most common cause of an un­erupted permanent maxillary central incisor. Suspicion should be raised if the lateral incisors erupt in advance of the centrals. In these cases, a radiograph of the premaxilla should be taken to allow early detection and localisation of any supernumerary, which should then be surgically re­moved. An attachment with gold chain should be bonded to the unerupted incisor to allow provision for orthodontic alignment if the tooth fails to erupt spontaneously within 12 months of surgery. In conjunction with surgery, space to accommodate the unerupted tooth must be maintained or opened by appliance therapy; the latter may entail ex­traction of the upper primary canines.
Supplemental Teeth
The supplemental tooth resembles the expected tooth in morphology and commonly produces crowding or displace­ment of adjacent teeth. Usually, the tooth, which is similar to the contralateral tooth, is better retained (provided it is not severely malpositioned) and the other incisor is extracted.

ANOMALIES OF DEVELOPMENT

First Permanent Molars With Poor Long-Term Prognosis
The first permanent molar is never the extraction of choice for orthodontic reasons but is invariably enforced because of poor prognosis resulting from caries and/or enamel hy­poplasia. Molar incisor hypoplasia (MIH) has an unknown aetiology but is reckoned to be multifactorial with genetic and systemic (acute and chronic illnesses) factors thought to interact; it affects about one in seven children worldwide with no gender bias. It may lead to marked enamel break­down, associated dental caries and dental sensitivity. Enamel demineralisation on the lingual aspect of lower first permanent molars or on the buccal aspect of upper first permanent molars should be treated seriously, as it is often a hallmark of a high caries rate and possible limited lifespan of these teeth. When a two-surface or deep occlusal restora­tion is indicated in one molar 2–3 years after eruption, careful assessment of the malocclusion and the condition of the other first permanent molars should be made. Timely removal may lead to considerable spontaneous correction of the malocclusion in certain patients but it does little for
252
Master Dentistry
relief of incisor crowding or correction of an incisor rela­tionship unless appliance therapy is instituted.
A ‘cook book’ approach to each patient with poor-quality first permanent molars is not possible but some guidelines are listed in Box 10.1.
Infraoccluded Primary Molars
Between 1% and 9% of children are likely to exhibit this anomaly but estimates regarding its incidence vary. A ge­netic tendency has been suggested with absent premolars, ectopic position of the first permanent molars and palatal canine displacement identified as associated factors. Infra­occlusion results from ankylosis of the tooth while alveolar growth and eruption of the adjacent teeth continues. Pro­vided the permanent successor is present, exfoliation will occur eventually, but removal is indicated in its absence and where the infraocclusion is marked, with the crown of the tooth just visible, or where root development of the un­erupted premolar is almost complete.
Impaction of the Maxillary First Permanent Molar
Impaction of the maxillary first permanent molar occurs in 2–6% of children. It may correct spontaneously (unlikely after the upper lateral incisors erupt) or it may require disim­paction of the molar either by placing a brass wire separator between the adjacent teeth (in mild cases) or by appliance therapy (in more marked impaction). Extraction of the sec­ond primary molar is required if the impaction produces symptomatic resorption with pulpal involvement or to facili­tate restoration of the first permanent molar. Crowding is
Box 10.1 Guidelines for Management of First Permanent Molars (FPM) With Poor Long-Term Prognosis.
n
Institute preventive measures including oral hygiene motivation, dietary advice and fluoride therapy.
n
Evaluate social circumstances, motivation for restorative and orthodontic treatment, level of dental awareness, general anaesthetic need, age and class of malocclusion.
n
Ensure (radiographically) that all permanent teeth, particularly second premolars and third molars, are present and that all others are of good prognosis. Avoid extraction of an FPM in a quadrant with an absent tooth, or in uncrowded arches.
n
Assess the need to balance or compensate for extraction of an FPM but balancing extraction of sound FPMs is seldomly indicated. To avoid occlusal interference from overeruption of 7, consider extraction of the upper FPM when extraction of a lower FPM is required but the corollary does not apply.
n
Timing of extraction of lower FPM is best when the bifurcations are calcifying (aged approximately 8.5–9.5 years) and moderate premolar crowding is present.
n
Timing of extraction of upper FPM is less important because of the distal tilt and downward and forward eruption path of 7.
n
Extraction of upper FPM is best delayed:
n
in Class III until the incisor crossbite is corrected
n
in Class II division 1 until 7s erupt
n
in severely crowded mouths until 7s erupt.
n
Extraction of lower FPM may be deferred in Class III with marked incisor crowding until lower 7s erupt.
n
Monitor eruption of second and third molars.
exacerbated by the subsequent mesial drift of the first perma­nent molar, but this can be treated later.
Aberrant Position of Second Premolars
Occasionally, the second premolars appear in slightly unfavourable positions when viewed on a radiograph, but generally this is of no long-term consequence and their final position is usually satisfactory. A grossly ectopic second premolar is rare and may be observed or surgically removed.
Posterior Crossbite With Mandibular Displacement
Sometimes, a unilateral crossbite of the buccal segment teeth with mandibular displacement follows a prolonged finger- or thumb-sucking habit. In some children, grinding the primary canines can lead to correction and prevent perpetuation of the crossbite from the mixed to the perma­nent dentition; where this is not effective, arch expansion by using either a removable appliance and a midline screw or a quadhelix is required to reduce the chance of the cross­bite being present in the permanent dentition. The latter treatment method is more efficient and cost-effective. Alter­natively, correction may be deferred until the premolars erupt (Fig. 10.1).

TREATMENT OF ANOMALIES BY SERIAL EXTRACTIONS

In 1948, Kjellgren, a Swedish orthodontist, ascribed the term ‘serial extractions’ to the following three-stage procedure:
n
Extraction of the primary canines at age 8.5–9.5 years to encourage alignment of the permanent incisors.
n
Extraction of the first primary molars approximately 1 year later to encourage eruption of the first premolars.
n
Extraction of the first premolars as the permanent canines are erupting.
The full extent of the original technique is never adopted in contemporary orthodontic practice, as three episodes of extractions are unpleasant for any child and may psycho­logically scar their attitude to subsequent dental treatment. In addition, simultaneous intervention at a time when the intercanine width is increasing makes gauging the extent
Fig. 10.1 Upper removable appliance to correct unilateral buccal
segment crossbite with associated mandibular displacement. • Midline
expansion screw; Adams’ clasps 64|46 (0.7 mm SS wire); buccal capping.
10  •  Orthodontics II: Management of Occlusal Problems
253
of crowding problematic. The process was originally in­tended to remove the need for appliance therapy but, in practice, this is seldom the case. In children with class I malocclusion, however, aged 10–12 years, with moderate crowding, a full complement of teeth in favourable posi­tions and no concern about the long-term prognosis of the first permanent molars, a reasonable outcome may be forthcoming from removal of the first premolars alone, without recourse to the earlier extraction of primary teeth. Planned extraction, however, of the primary canines is ben­eficial in the following instances:
n
To allow labial movement of a permanent upper lateral incisor erupting palatal to the permanent upper central incisors and in potential crossbite.
n
To create space in the upper labial segment for proclina­tion of an instanding permanent lateral incisor or the eruption of a permanent incisor, where a supernumer­ary tooth has delayed its appearance.
n
To promote alignment of a displaced permanent maxillary canine; this is particularly beneficial where the canine is displaced palatally.
n
To facilitate lingual movement of a labially placed per­manent lower incisor with reduced periodontal support or of the lower labial segment to aid anterior crossbite correction in class III malocclusion.

OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL PROBLEMS

Early Loss of Primary Teeth
Early loss of primary teeth is most commonly caused by caries but, occasionally, it results from premature exfolia­tion, often when there is severe crowding, or it may be planned (e.g. to encourage space closure by mesial drift of the buccal segments in children who are missing one or more permanent teeth). In all cases, consideration should be given to balancing (extraction of the same tooth on the opposite side of the arch) or to compensating (extraction of the equivalent opposing tooth) for an extraction, the re­spective justification being to avoid a shift of the midline or to ensure that the occlusion is not compromised. Prema­ture loss of a primary tooth does not inevitably lead to pre­mature eruption of the permanent successor.
The effects of early loss of a primary tooth depend on
several factors including:
n
the patient’s age
n
the degree of crowding
n
the tooth extracted
n
the arch from which it is removed
n
the type of occlusion.
All of these influence the potential for crowding to be concentrated at the extraction site. In general, this poten­tial is greatest in a young child with pre-existing crowding when a maxillary posterior tooth is removed with poor buc­cal segment intercuspation.
Incisors
Early loss of a primary incisor tends to have minimal effect as it usually exfoliates in the early mixed dentition. Prema­ture loss of a primary incisor through trauma may, how­ever, lead to dilaceration of the permanent successor.
Canines
Unilateral loss of a primary canine invariably leads to movement of the centreline and should be balanced to prevent this occurring.
First Molars
Occasionally, displacement of the centreline follows early extraction of a first primary molar, but the need for a bal­ancing extraction is best assessed by checking the midlines at subsequent reviews.
Second Primary Molars
Where the second primary molar is extracted, the first per­manent molar migrates mesially and may lead to consider­able space loss if the extraction is carried out before the permanent molar erupts; hence, it is preferable to delay extraction until the first permanent molar has erupted. Pro­vided the prognosis of the other second primary molars is favourable, in general, the need for a compensating or bal­ancing extraction is unlikely but should be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Space Maintenance for Early Tooth Loss
Space maintenance is indicated:
n
when premature loss of a tooth promotes crowding in an otherwise acceptable occlusion
n
in severely crowded mouths where all of the extraction space is required for alignment of the remaining teeth
n
following traumatic loss of an upper permanent incisor.
A removable appliance will usually suffice in the upper arch but a lingual arch soldered to bands cemented to mo­lar teeth is best in the lower. The impact on dental health and potential to strain co-operation with regard to further comprehensive treatment should be borne in mind.
Upper Median Diastema
Upper median diastema is a typical phase of dental develop­ment and reduces as the permanent maxillary canines erupt. It has a tendency to run in families or may be racial in origin or result from:
n
a midline supernumerary tooth
n
missing or small upper lateral incisors
n
incisor proclination in class II division 1 malocclusion (Section 10.3) or due to a digit-sucking habit
n
a more generalised spacing condition due to mismatch in tooth/arch size (Section 10.2).
A radiograph of the upper incisor area should be taken to exclude the presence of a supernumerary tooth in those with a large midline diastema. Rarely, a low-lying attachment of the labial frenum is a primary cause, as the attachment usually recedes as the incisors approxi­mate. In a spaced arch, this does not occur, indicating that the frenum is associated with, but not causative of, the diastema.
Where the frenum is implicated in causing a diastema, blanching of the incisive papilla usually occurs when the lip is pulled upwards or outwards, with characteristic V-shaped notching of the alveolar bone between the two central inci­sors visible radiographically. The need for fraenectomy should be assessed after eruption of the permanent canines
254
Master Dentistry
and is preferably undertaken during space closure as the scar tissue will aid approximation of the incisors. Treat­ment of the diastema in the early mixed dentition may be necessary if there is insufficient space for the lateral incisors and the diastema exceeds 3 mm but vigilance is needed to ensure that the lateral incisor roots are not moved into the path of the erupting canines. A fixed appliance is usually required to close an upper midline space, with bodily approximation of the incisors followed by palatal bonded retention.
Dilaceration
Dilaceration is a sudden angular alteration in the long axis of the crown or in the root of a tooth. Most com­monly it results from intrusion of a primary incisor driv­ing the crown of the permanent successor palatally, and it leads to enamel and dentine hypoplasia. On occasion, dilaceration is developmental in origin, more so in fe­males and with a characteristic labial and superior coro­nal deflection of the tooth involved. Usually, a dilacerated incisor remains unerupted and when markedly affected requires surgical removal but, if the dilaceration is mild, surgical exposure and orthodontic alignment may be fea­sible when the root apex is destined not to perforate the cortical plate.
Traumatic Loss of an Upper Permanent Central Incisor
As the adjacent teeth tend to tilt towards the site of loss in the first days following trauma, the space must be main­tained, ideally by immediate reimplantation of the tooth or by fitting a denture carrying a replacement tooth. Later, autotransplantation of preferably a single-rooted premolar (either upper second or a lower) with restorative modification or prosthetic replacement by adhesive or fixed bridgework or implant may be considered. This is generally preferable to space closure, as a lateral incisor rarely gives an optimum appearance in a central incisor position, even with coronal build-up and gingival recon­touring. Involvement of oral surgery, paediatric dental and restorative colleagues is required for optimal treat­ment planning. Should autotransplantation be consid­ered, provided that adequate space has been created and the donor site carefully prepared, this is best undertaken when two-thirds to three-quarters of the root is devel­oped, ensuring an atraumatic technique and that the tooth is positioned at gingival level before splinting for 7 – 10 days. This procedure has good success with failure only reported in 10% – 15% of cases.
Incisors in Crossbite
Early correction of a crossbite involving a permanent inci­sor is essential to prevent displacing occlusal forces com­promising the periodontal support of the lower anterior teeth and to allow the occlusion to develop around an undisplaced condylar position. Provided there is likely to be adequate overbite of 2–3 mm, an upper removable appli­ance with a double-cantilever spring to procline the in­standing incisor and posterior capping to disengage the occlusion will usually suffice (see Section 10.5 and
Fig. 10.2); a screw section clasping the teeth in crossbite
d
e
Fig. 10.2 Upper removable appliance to procline 1|1 in the early mixed
dentition, assuming all primary teeth are in good condition. • Double-
cantilever springs 1|1 (0.5 mm SS wire); Adams’ clasps d|d (0.6 mm SS wire) and 6|6 (0.7 mm SS wire); posterior capping 2–3 mm in height to disengage the anterior occlusion.
d
e
will maintain appliance retention where two or more teeth need to be moved anteriorly. It may be necessary to remove the upper primary canines to facilitate crossbite correction on a permanent upper lateral incisor or the lower primary canines to allow alignment of a labially placed permanent lower incisor.
Habits
Depending on the positioning of a finger(s) or thumb, the frequency and intensity of a sucking habit may:
n
procline the upper incisors
n
retrocline the lower incisors
n
increase the overjet, often asymmetrically
n
reduce the overbite
n
lead to a crossbite tendency of the buccal segments.
Gentle persuasion to discontinue the habit should be given and simple measures adopted to effect this. Fitting of a fixed habit breaker (palatal crib or palatal arch) may be considered if the child is eager to stop.
Increased Overjet
Where the overjet is greater than 3 mm, the risk of incisor trauma is more than doubled; trauma is more common in boys and the risk is greater with incompetent lips. An initial phase of functional appliance treatment to retract the inci­sors may be beneficial in these children or where the maloc­clusion is associated with bullying. A second phase with fixed appliances, however, is generally required to detail the occlusion with possibly premolar extractions for relief of crowding. As overall treatment time is increased and con­siderable demands placed on patient co-operation, the likely benefits of such early intervention must be deemed to out­weigh potential disadvantages including the risk of upper incisor root resorption if these teeth are retracted into the eruption path of the upper canines.
Results of a North American clinical trial found that early skeletal effects produced by either functional or headgear therapy in the preadolescent period were not maintained long term. In addition, little or no differ­ences existed following fixed appliance therapy in the
10  •  Orthodontics II: Management of Occlusal Problems
255
permanent dentition between those who had been treated earlier or who had been observed until the permanent dentition erupted. Furthermore, a multicentre UK trial established that functional appliance treatment at 8–10 years of age did not result in a better skeletal or occlusal outcome. Consequently many clinicians now prefer to wait until the permanent dentition before starting treat­ment in these cases. Functional appliance treatment in the early mixed dentition, however, is indicated to reduce the risk of incisor trauma or where a child is being teased because of the malocclusion. The need for a custom-made mouthguard for sports should also be emphasised for all children with an increased overjet.
Ectopic Maxillary Canines
The maxillary canine is ectopic in approximately 2% of the population, with 15% of these buccal and 85% palatal to the arch. Development of the maxillary canine begins about 4–5 months after birth, the crown is complete around 6–7 years and eruption is typically at 11–12 years. From an initial position high in the maxilla, the tooth moves buc­cally downwards and forwards to be guided into its final position by the distal aspect of the lateral incisor root. For this reason, absence or diminution in the size of the lateral incisor increases the incidence of displacement (32.4). There also appears to be a greater incidence of palatal ca­nine displacement where the maxillary arch is spaced or in class II division 2 malocclusion; a polygenic multifactorial aetiology has been suggested for palatal displacement. With this, there is a familial and racial (more common in Europeans) tendency, greater prevalence in females than males and an increased bilateral occurrence than seems likely. In addition, there is an association with absent or small teeth, infraoccluded primary molars, impacted upper first permanent molars and other ectopic teeth. The long erup­tion path and in the case of more pronounced displacement, ectopic position of the tooth germ, are additional possible aetiological factors. Buccal displacement is more common in crowded arches. Where routine palpation of the buccal sulcus at 10–11 years fails to detect a canine prominence, the path of eruption is likely to deviate from the expected. In addition, considerable delay in the eruption of a canine compared with the opposite side of the arch points to ca­nine displacement.
Transposition
Transposition occurs when the position of the canine is in­terchanged with that of an adjacent tooth. It has a preva­lence of less than 1% and an aetiology involving genetic and environmental factors. In the upper arch, the maxil­lary canine and first premolar, or the lateral incisor and canine, are involved, although the former arrangement is more common. In the lower arch, the lateral incisor and canine teeth are solely affected.
Estimating the Maxillary Canine Position
clinical estimate. Buccal and palatal palpation along
with observation of the lateral incisor inclination give a hint to the canine position. When it is lying low and palatal or high and buccal, the lateral incisor is likely to be labially inclined.
radiographic estimation. Although a dental panoramic
tomogram is helpful in the initial assessment of the canine position, it underestimates its potential for alignment; the tooth is actually closer to the midline and at a more acute angle than it appears radiographically. Further ra­diographic views are needed to locate the position of the tooth. Most commonly an upper anterior occlusal view, preferably taken at 70 – 75°, or two periapical films taken with a tube shift are needed to allow localisation, using vertical or horizontal parallax respectively. The axial inclination, apex location and the vertical and mesiodistal position of the canine relative to the incisor roots should be assessed. The permanent incisors should be checked carefully to exclude resorption, and the root length of the primary canine noted. Resorption of incisors is more com­mon in females than males and there is a 50% greater risk of its occurrence should the canine be at a greater than 25° angulation to the midline when viewed on a dental panoramic tomogram. If incisor resorption is detected, urgent treatment is indicated. Removal of the impacted canine may arrest the resorption but extraction of the inci­sor may be required in those with severe resorption. Cone­beam computed tomography (CBCT) can reveal the full extent of resorption.
Management of Canine Displacement
The management of buccal or palatal maxillary canine displacement including transposition is described in
Table 10.2.

ANOMALIES OF SIZE AND FORM

Size
Teeth of a size that is greater or less than the norms for gender and for a given population are described as ‘mega­dont’ or ‘microdont’, respectively.
Megadontia has a prevalence of 1.1% in the permanent dentition, with maxillary central incisors most frequently affected, although lower second premolars are affected oc­casionally. The typical shape and absence of incisor notch­ing distinguishes megadont maxillary incisors from ‘double teeth’. Megadont teeth may be found unilaterally on the af­fected side in unilateral facial hyperplasia, but more gener­alised megadontia is associated with gigantism. A megadont upper incisor may produce crowding, an increased overjet or both. If the tooth is only slightly enlarged, removal of about 1 mm of enamel from each proximal surface and ap­pliance therapy to close the resultant space may suffice. In gross enlargement, extraction of the affected tooth and placement of a pontic following any appliance treatment may be necessary.
Microdontia is frequently seen in association with hy­podontia, in Down syndrome and in ectodermal dysplasia. The prevalence is 0.2–0.5% in the primary dentition and
2.5% in the permanent dentition, with diminutive upper lateral incisors accounting for 1–2% of the latter. Short roots are often found on these teeth, which may be a factor in the aetiology of palatally displaced canines. In crowded mouths, where the lateral incisor is peg-shaped on one side of the arch and of typical size on the opposite side, removal of both lateral incisors may be optimal to achieve symmetry
256
Master Dentistry
Table 10.2 Management of Maxillary Canine Displacement.
Treatment Options Indications Comments
Buccal displacement
Palatal displacement
Transposition Accept Transposition complete
a
In each case, the patient’s interest in orthodontic treatment, their level of dental awareness and general features of the malocclusion (including the degree of
crowding or spacing and the condition of the primary canine (if present) and adjacent teeth) must be assessed before the final treatment plan can be devised.
b
91% chance of normalisation of eruption path of 3 with extraction of c where 3 is mesially positioned and overlaps , half of root of 2; 64% chance of eruption
of 3 if . half of 2 root overlapped. Recent evidence shows significant improvement in success rate of eruption of 3 with the use of RME and headgear (or headgear only) compared to untreated controls.
Early removal of 4 before 3 erupts
Exposure of 3 Delayed eruption of 3 Apically repositioned flap or replaced flap required at
Removal of 3 Severe crowding with 2 and 4 in contact 3
Early removal
b
of c
Exposure of 3 Well-disposed patient
Transplantation
Removal of 3 Hopeless prognosis for alignment of 3
Retain 3 Occasionally in a young patient who is
Extraction of the most displaced tooth
Orthodontic Sufficient space in the arch Apical positions of the transposed teeth will determine
Moderate crowding May require removable or sectional fixed appliance to
severely displaced
Ectopic position of 3 detected at 10–13 years of age 3 overlaps up to half width of 2 3 crown below the apical third of 2 root 3 long axis to midsagittal plane #30° Ideally, crowding in arch no greater than mild
Good oral hygiene and dentition
3 overlaps less than half width of 1 and below the apical third of 2 root 3 root apex is not distal to 5 and 3 long axis #30° to midsagittal plane Spaced arch or possible to create space
Hopeless prognosis for alignment of 3 Adequate space in arch for 3
Intact removal of 3 possible Adequate buccal/palatal bone
Patient not keen for appliance therapy or evidence of incisor resorption or dentigerous cyst 2 and 4 in contact Good root length on c and aesthetics of c acceptable
uncertain about treatment at present but may elect to proceed with alignment of 3 later
If crowding present
a
align 3 depending on axial inclination
surgery Bond bracket or gold chain to 3 to facilitate alignment
May require fixed appliance to detail the occlusion or close any remaining space
Extract contralateral c to prevent centerline shift; extraction of c may promote crowding
Failure of 3 to erupt will leave space
Bond bracket or gold chain to 3 at surgery May commence alignment of 3 with removable appliance but fixed appliance usually required to align apex of 3 Prospects for alignment reduced and treatment time extended in adults
Prognosis improved if root of 3 is two-thirds to three­quarters formed, minimal root handling at surgery, 3 not in occlusion with 6 weeks of sectional archwire splint Approximately 70% survival rate at 5 years
Prosthetic replacement of c required when lost
Periodic radiographic examination of incisors required to exclude resorption
whether alignment is carried out in the transposed positions or if these are corrected
in the upper labial segment. If the diminutive lateral incisor is retained, orthodontic treatment should first create suffi­cient space to ensure that the tooth can be restored to ideal anatomical dimensions. This space is maintained for at least 3 months with metal spurs on a removable retainer prior to final restoration.
Form
Double Teeth
n
Have a prevalence of 0.1–0.2% in the permanent dentition.
n
Are equally common in males and females.
n
Affect incisors more frequently than other tooth types.
Clinical appearance can vary from an incisal notch in a tooth of enlarged mesiodistal width to an anomaly resem­bling two separate crowns. Treatment is best delayed until the pulp has receded. Separation may be possible if there are two separate pulp chambers and root canals, but recon­touring of the crown to resemble two separate teeth or re­duction of its mesiodistal width may be possible where one pulp chamber exists.
The reported Prevalence in the primary dentition is 0.5–
1.6% in White European populations and it affects teeth mostly in the mandibular labial segment. In the presence of hypodontia, double primary teeth are followed usually by absence of permanent teeth, but supernumerary teeth are more common in the permanent dentition if all of the