Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5523_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
Using This Book
ix
a cautious approach in answering a relatively small number of questions. This can lead to problems, how­ever, as we all make simple mistakes or even disagree vehemently with the answer favoured by the examiner! Caution may lead you to answer too few questions to pass after the marks have been deducted for incorrect answers.
Extended Matching Items (EMIs)
The extended matching items questions are becoming more popular for dental assessments and lend themselves well to clinical dental situations. You are usually presented with an overarching theme for the question set and then a list of 10–15 options from which you have to choose your an­swers. There is then a short lead-in statement followed by the stems; a set of questions, often clinical vignettes, for which you are asked to select, in your opinion, the one best response from the aforementioned list. For example, the list may be causes of dental pain (Necrotising Gingivitis, revers­ible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, and so on), and the clinical vignettes describe signs and symptoms for which there is ONE BEST ANSWER to select from the list. Occasionally, you may be asked to select two answers from the list or more than one answer may be appropriate for one question. As with any type of assessment, it is crucial that you read the instructions for the question before attempting to answer so that you know exactly what you are being asked to do. EMIs are notoriously time-consuming and difficult to write and are usually as challenging for the examiners to write as they are for the candidates to answer! One of the more common pitfalls when writing these questions is for the list of poten­tial options to comprise heterogeneous, unrelated items, for example five causes of dental pain, three partial denture components, two drugs used for sedation and two periodon­tal diagnoses. If the vignette is based on dental sedation then you only have to choose from the two drugs rather than the other options that are simply irrelevant. These questions tend not to be negatively marked so you would then have a 50–50 chance of being right should you need to guess!
Essays
Essays are not negatively marked. Relevant facts will re­ceive marks as will a logical development of the argument or theme. Conversely, good marks will not be obtained for an essay that is a set of unconnected statements. Length matters little if there is no cohesion. Relevant graphs and diagrams should also be included but must be properly labelled.
Most people are aware of the need to ‘plan’ their answer; yet few do this. Make sure that what you put in your plan is relevant to the question asked, as irrelevant material is, at best, a waste of valuable time and, at worst, causes the ex­aminer to doubt your understanding. It is especially impor­tant in an examination based on essays that time is man­aged and all questions are given equal weight, unless guided otherwise in the instructions. A brilliant answer in one es­say will not compensate for not attempting another be­cause of time. Nobody can get more than 100% (usually 70–80%, tops) on a single answer! It may even be useful to begin with the questions about which you feel you have
least to say so that any time left over can be safely devoted to your areas of strength at the end.
Short Notes
Short notes are not negatively marked. The system is usu­ally for a ‘marking template’ to be devised that gives a mark(s) for each important fact (also called criterion mark­ing). Nothing is gained for style or superfluous information. The aim is to set out your knowledge in an ordered, concise manner. The major faults of students are, first, devoting too much time to a single question thereby neglecting the rest, and, second, not limiting their answer to the question asked. For example, in a question about the treatment of periodontal disease, all facts about periodontal disease should not be listed, only those relevant to its treatment.
Picture Questions
Pattern recognition is the first step in a picture quiz. This should be coupled with a systematic approach looking for, and listing, abnormalities. For example, the general appear­ance of the facial skeleton as well as the local appearance of the individual bones and any soft tissue shadows can be examined in any radiograph. Make an attempt to describe what you see even if you are in doubt. Use any additional statements or data that accompany the radiographs as they will give a clue to the answer required.
Case History Questions
A more sophisticated form of examination question is an evolving case history with information being presented se­quentially; you are asked to give a response at each stage. They are constructed so that a wrong response in the first part of the question still means that you can obtain marks from the subsequent parts. Patient management problems are designed to test the recall and application of knowledge through an understanding of the principles involved. You should always give answers unless the instructions indicate the presence of negative marking.
Viva/Oral Examination
The viva or oral examination can be a nerve-wracking ex­perience. You are normally faced with two examiners (per­haps including an external examiner) who may react with irritation, boredom or indifference to what you say. You should try and strike a balance between saying too little and too much. It is important to try not to go off the topic. Aim to keep your answers short and to the point. It is worth­while pausing for a few seconds to collect your thoughts before launching into an answer. Do not be afraid to say ‘I don’t know’; most examiners will want to change tack to see what you do know.
In some centres, oral examinations are only offered to candidates who have either distinguished themselves or who are in danger of failing. Interviews for the two types of candidate vary considerably. In the ‘distinction’ setting, the examiner may try to discover what the candidate does not know and may also be looking for evidence of knowl­edge of the current literature. A small number of topics will usually be considered in depth. In the pass/fail setting, the examiner will try to cover many topics, often quite superficially. She/he will try to establish whether the
x
Using This Book
candidate did badly in the written examination because of ignorance in just a couple of areas, or whether ignorance is wide ranging.
Remember also that the examiners may have your written paper in front of them; if you have done particularly badly in one topic, they may well take this up in the oral examination. This is not an attempt to be unpleasant, but a chance for you to redeem yourself somewhat, so be prepared.

CONCLUSIONS

You should amend your framework for using this book ac­cording to your own needs and the examinations you are facing. Whatever approach you adopt, your aim should be for an understanding of the principles involved rather than rote learning of a large number of poorly connected facts.

List of Contributors

The editor(s) would like to acknowledge and offer grateful thanks for the input of all previous editions’ contributors, without whom this new edition would not have been possible.
Oliver Bailey, BDS(Hons), MFDS RCSEd, PG Cert Clin Implant Dent, FHEA, MDTFEd
Clinical Fellow in Restorative Dentistry
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Heidi Bateman, PhD, BDS, LLM, PgCME, PgDipDPH, SFHEA, FDTFEd, FAcadMEd
Clinical Trainer in Restorative Dentistry/Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Alison Cairns, PhD, MSc, BDS, MFDS, M Paed Dent, FDS (Paed Dent) RCPSG, PGDAP, FHEA
Senior Lecturer/Honorary Consultant
Paediatric Dentistry Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Glasgow United Kingdom
Ian Ellis, BDS, SFHEA
Clinical Trainer in Restorative Dentistry/Clinical
and Academic Lead in Removable Prosthodontics
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Janice Ellis, PhD, BDS(Hons), FDS RCS (Rest Dent), FDS RCSEd, FHEA, PGCE
Professor of Dental Education/Director of Dental
Education
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Richard Holliday, PhD, BDS (Hons), MFDS RCSEd, MFDS an eundem RCSEng, MClinRes, M Perio RCSEd
Senior Clinical Lecturer/ Honorary Consultant in
Restorative Dentistry
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Douglas Lovelock, MSc, BDS, MDS, FDSRCS, DDRRCR
Retired Consultant & Honorary Senior Lecturer
Radiology & Oral Surgery School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Catherine Theresa McCann, BDS, MFDS, MPaed Dent, FDS (Paed Dent) RCPSG, PgCert
Specialty Dentist in Paediatric Dentistry
Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast United Kingdom
Giles McCracken, PhD, BDS, FDS RCPSG, FDS(Rest Dent), PGCAP FHEA
Professor of Restorative Dentistry
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Declan Millett, BDSc, DDS, FDSRCPS(Glasg), FDSRCS(Eng), DOrthRCS(Eng), MOrthRCS(Eng), FHEA
Professor of Orthodontics/Consultant
Orthodontist
Dental School University College Cork, Cork Ireland
xi
xii
List of Contributors
Francis Nohl, MBBS, BDS, MSc, MRD, FDS(Rest Dent), DDS
Consultant in Restorative Dentistry/Honorary
Clinical Senior Lecturer
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Jillian Phillips, BDS (Hons), MFDS, MPaed Dent, MClin Dent (Paediatric Dentistry)
Post CCST Trainee in Paediatric Dentistry
Paediatric Dental Department Glasgow Dental Hospital and School Glasgow United Kingdom
Nigel Douglas Robb, TD, PhD, BDS, FDSRCSEd, FDS(Rest Dent), FDSRCPS(Glasg), FDTF RCSEd, FHEA
Professor
School of Dentistry and Oral Health Griffith University, Southport Queensland Australia
Simon Stone, PhD, BDS, MFDS RCSEd, MEndo RCSEd, FDTFEd, FHEA
Senior Clinical Lecturer/Honorary Consultant
(Endodontics)
School of Dental Sciences Newcastle University/Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Phillip Tomson, PhD, BDS, MFDS RCSEd, RCSEng, FDS (Rest Dent) RCSEd
Senior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant
in Restorative Dentistry
School of Dentistry Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham
Birmingham Birmingham United Kingdom
1

Periodontology

CHAPTER OUTLINE
Overview, 1
1.1 Healthy Periodontium, 1
1.2 History and Examination, 3
1.3 Gingivitis, 8
1.4 Periodontal Diseases, 9
1.5 Microbiology and Pathogenesis of Periodontal Diseases, 12
1.6 Risk Factors and Predisposing Factors, 17
1.7 Furcation and Periodontal–Endodontic Lesions, 19

Overview

A healthy or a stable periodontium is an important prereq­uisite both for the maintenance of a functional dentition and to ensure a long-term, successful outcome of restorative dental treatment. In view of the high prevalence of gingivi­tis and periodontitis in the population, all dental patients should undergo periodontal screening, although more thor­ough clinical and radiographic examinations are essential before a definitive periodontal diagnosis is confirmed and a treatment plan formulated. These examinations, together with medical, dental and social histories, may also reveal predisposing and risk factors that increase an individual’s susceptibility to, and the subsequent rate of progression of, periodontal disease.
The intensive oral hygiene phase of treatment and the patient’s compliance with a personalised plaque-control regimen are of major importance in stabilising the disease and improving the long-term prognosis for an affected dentition. Scaling and root surface instrumentation (RSI) are frequently indicated to disrupt the subgingival biofilm and remove calculus. Recognising predisposing local factors, modifying systemic factors and modifying envi­ronmental factors that determine periodontal health has become increasingly important for the dental team. Additional adjunctive treatments that may be indicated are periodontal surgery, guided tissue regeneration (GTR), systemic or locally delivered antimicrobials and the man­agement of localised problems such as furcation defects, mucogingival problems, endodontic–periodontal lesions and loss of attachment (LOA) that has been exacerbated by occlusal trauma.
In 2017 the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases changed and therefore this affects the diagnoses we arrive at for patients attending our practices. This chapter seeks to begin to align to the new terminology that is estab­lishing itself around the world. Readers are encouraged to engage with the extensive publications from the 2017 World
1.8 Gingival Problems, 24
1.9 Trauma and the Periodontium, 27
1.10 Periodontal Manifestations of Syndromes and Medical Conditions, 28
1.11 Treatment of Periodontal Disease, 30
Self-Assessment: Questions, 38 Self-Assessment: Answers, 42
Workshop and to review the interpretations by specialist organisations such as the British Society of Periodontology, European Federation of Periodontology and American Academy of Periodontology on how to implement this change into your clinical practice.
The new classification is summarised as follows (Caton
et al., 2018):
n
Periodontal Health, Gingival Diseases and Conditions
n
Periodontal health and gingival health
n
Gingivitis: Dental Biofilm-Induced
n
Gingival diseases: non–dental biofilm-induced
n
Forms of Periodontitis
n
Necrotising periodontal diseases
n
Periodontitis as a manifestation of systemic diseases
n
Periodontitis
n
Other Conditions Affecting the Periodontium
n
Systemic diseases or conditions affecting the peri­odontal supporting tissues
n
Periodontal abscesses and endodontic–periodontal lesions
n
Mucogingival deformities and conditions
n
Traumatic occlusal forces
n
Tooth- and prosthesis-related factors

1.1 Healthy Periodontium

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You should:
• know the clinical and radiographic features of healthy
periodontal tissues in adults and in children
• be familiar with the histological structures of the peri-
odontium.
The diagnostic skills required to identify periodontal dis­eases, particularly in the early stages, are based upon a sound knowledge of the clinical appearance of healthy tissues.
1
2
Sulcular
ratinised
Master Dentistry
Within the 2017 classification of periodontal and gingival health, the following categories are considered:
n
Clinical gingival health on an intact periodontium
n
Clinical gingival health on a reduced periodontium
n
Stable periodontitis patient
n
Non-periodontitis patient
The 2017 consensus defined periodontal health. Two states of health are proposed: pristine periodontal health in cases where there is an absence of inflammation clinically (no bleeding on probing) and clinically healthy cases having limited levels of clinical markers of inflammation (10% bleeding on probing). The gingiva is pink, firm in texture and extends from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival line. The interdental papillae are pyramidal in shape and occupy the interdental spaces beneath the contact points of the teeth. Gingiva is keratinised and stip­pling is frequently present. The gingiva comprises the free and the attached portions.
The free gingiva is the most coronal band of unattached tissue demarcated by the free gingival groove, which can sometimes be detected clinically. The depth of the gingival sulcus ranges from 0.5 to 3.0 mm.
The attached gingiva is firmly bound to underlying ce­mentum and alveolar bone and extends apically from the free gingival groove to the mucogingival junction. The width of attached gingiva varies considerably through­out the mouth. It is usually narrower on the lingual as­pect of the mandibular incisors and labially, adjacent to the canines and first premolars. In the absence of in­flammation, the width of the attached gingiva increases with age.
The mucogingival line is often indistinct. It defines the junction between the keratinised, attached gingiva and the oral mucosa. Oral mucosa is non-keratinised and, there­fore, appears redder than the adjacent gingiva. The tissues can be distinguished by staining with Schiller’s iodine solu­tion; keratinised gingiva stains orange and non-keratinised mucosa stains purple–blue. This can be used to determine clinically the width of keratinised tissue that remains (e.g. in areas of gingival recession).
epithelium
Junctional epithelium
Biologic
width
Cemento-enamel junction
Alveolar bone crest
Fig. 1.1 Diagrammatic representation of the epithelial and connective tissue attachments of the gingiva.
n
oral epithelium: keratinised and extends from the free
Free
gingival
margin
Free
gingiva
Free
gingival
groove
Ke
gingiva
Attached
gingiva
Mucogingival junction
Oral mucosa
gingival margin to the mucogingival line.
Gingival connective tissue core contains ground substance, blood vessels and lymphatics, nerves, fibroblasts and bun­dles of gingival collagen fibres (dentogingival, alveologingi­val, circular and trans-septal). The combined epithelial and gingival fibre attachment to the tooth surface is the biologic width (2017 classification system recommended this is now called ‘supracrestal tissue attachment’), which is typically 2 mm, not including the sulcus depth (see Fig. 1.1).
Periodontal connective tissues comprise alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, principal and oxytalan fibres, cells, ground substance, nerves, blood vessels and lymphatics, and cementum.

RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES

The crest of the interdental alveolar bone is well defined and lies approximately 0.5–1.5 mm apical to the cemento­enamel junction (CEJ; Fig. 1.1). The periodontal membrane space, often identifiable on intraoral radiographs taken us­ing a paralleling technique, is approximately 0.1–0.2 mm wide. This accounts for the slight tooth mobility that is sometimes observed when lateral pressure is applied to a tooth with a healthy periodontium.

HISTOLOGY

Epithelial components include:
n
junctional epithelium (JE) cells: non-keratinised and attached to the tooth surface by a basal lamina and hemidesmosomes
n
sulcular epithelium: non-keratinised and lines the gingi­val crevice

PERIODONTAL TISSUES IN CHILDREN

The gingiva in children may appear red and inflamed. Com­pared with mature tissue, there is a thinner epithelium that is less keratinised, greater vascularity of connective tissues and less variation in the width of the attached gingiva.
During tooth eruption, the gingival sulcus depths may reach 5 mm and gingival margins will be at different levels on adjacent teeth. Following tooth eruption, a persistent hyperaemia can lead to swollen and rounded interproximal papillae, thus giving an appearance of gingivitis.
Radiographic Features
In the primary dentition, the radiographic distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the alveolar crest is 0–2 mm. Greater variation (0–4 mm) is observed at sites adjacent to erupting permanent teeth and exfoliating pri­mary teeth. The periodontal membrane space is wider in children because of the thinner cementum, immature alve­olar bone and a more vascular periodontal ligament.
1  •  Periodontology
3

GINGIVAL CREVICULAR FLUID

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is a serum exudate that is derived from the microvasculature of the gingiva and peri­odontal ligament. The ‘preinflammatory’ flow of GCF may be mediated by bacterial products from subgingival plaque that diffuse intercellularly and accumulate adjacent to the basement membrane of the junctional epithelium. This creates an osmotic gradient; consequently, GCF flow can be regarded as a transudate rather than an inflammatory exudate in patients who may be described as having pris­tine periodontal health. The condition of pristine peri­odontal health is unlikely to be seen in practice, with the definition of being a clinically healthy case more likely. Therefore GCF in patients who have clinical periodontal health, in some ways, is similar to serum but also contains components from microbial sources, interstitial fluid and locally produced inflammatory and immune products of host origin. The proportions of these components are dependent upon:
n
the presence and composition of subgingival plaque
n
the rate of turnover of gingival connective tissue
n
the permeability of epithelia
n
the degree of inflammation.
Several techniques have been developed for collecting
GCF from the gingival sulcus:
n
absorbent paper strips
n
microcapillary tubes
n
gingival washing.
The fluid can then be analysed for specific mediators of the immunoinflammatory response (e.g. cytokines) and breakdown products of connective tissues, both of which have been associated with ongoing periodontal destruction.

CLINICAL GINGIVAL HEALTH ON A REDUCED PERIODONTIUM

The 2017 classification now recognises that gingival health is present after treatment that has stabilised periodontitis where loss of periodontal attachment has occurred; it also recognises there is also a situation where there is gingival health on a reduced periodontium after crown lengthening surgery and gingival recession.

1.2 History and Examination

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You should:
• understand the importance of obtaining thorough
histories (medical, social and presenting complaint) from patients who attend for treatment
• know those medical conditions that impact periodontal
diseases and therapy
• be familiar with the diagnostic procedures and
special tests to be used when evaluating patients with periodontitis.
From the periodontal viewpoint, the aims of history tak­ing and the clinical examination are to establish the extent of periodontal destruction and to evaluate the effects of disease on the remaining dentition. It is also important to evaluate the individual patient’s susceptibility to periodon­tal disease and, as far as possible, identify the sites that appear to be associated with active or ongoing destruction and need to be considered a priority for treatment.

PRESENTING COMPLAINT

One of the principal features of periodontal diseases is that their onset and progression occur often in the absence of pain. This means that the onus for detection rests firmly with the clinician, and the importance of regular examinations must be impressed upon the patient, with emphasis placed on prevention to stabilise rather than cure. The well-in­formed patient who is a regular dental attender should be able to detect some of the signs or symptoms that are associ­ated with the early stages of plaque accumulation. Unfortu­nately, many patients are irregular dental attenders and only present with complaints that are the consequence of oral neglect. When gingivitis and periodontal inflammation do cause symptoms, the chief complaints are usually ‘bleeding gums’, ‘bad taste or breath’, ‘localised pain’ and teeth that have ‘changed position’ or ‘become loose’. Details of when such problems started, the frequency of pain or discomfort and any associated symptoms should be recorded. The expec­tations of the patient with regard to the outcome of treat­ment should also be discussed at this stage.
Gingival Bleeding
Bleeding gums is perhaps the most common complaint of patients with periodontal disease. The bleeding is usually noticed during, or following, toothbrushing or eating. When bleeding occurs spontaneously, a patient may complain of tasting blood on awakening in the morning. The severity of the haemorrhage does not necessarily relate to the severity of disease, as a marginal gingivitis can be associated with quite profuse bleeding. Gingival bleeding is exacerbated by the use of certain drugs (anticoagulants, antithrombotics and fibrinolytic agents). Symptoms of relatively recent and sudden onset should be investigated thoroughly when tak­ing the medical history.
Drifting of Teeth
Drifting of anterior teeth and the appearance of spaces be­tween teeth are often the first signs of an underlying peri­odontal problem. When teeth begin to drift, it is because their periodontal support has been compromised to such an extent that the teeth are no longer in equilibrium with forces from occlusion and the adjacent soft tissues. In some instances, this position of equilibrium is so finely balanced that the destruction of only crestal bone and the coronal periodontal fibre groups will precipitate changes in tooth position. Furthermore, the pressures exerted on the teeth by gingiva that are swollen through oedematous or fibrous change can also induce tooth movement. Drifting of ante­rior teeth may also be a consequence of an occlusal inter­ference in the posterior segments, which leads to a forward slide of the mandible during its arc of movement from the retruded contact position to the intercuspal position.
4
Master Dentistry
Loose Teeth
When periodontal disease remains untreated, attachment loss is progressive and teeth become increasingly mobile. The degree of mobility that some patients accept before at­tending for treatment is remarkable and many patients still believe that increasing tooth mobility and, ultimately, tooth loss is a natural consequence of the ageing process. An in­crease in mobility also occurs when a tooth is subject to traumatic occlusal forces, particularly those of a ‘jiggling’ nature. Mobility may be the first signs of an advanced stage of periodontitis or perhaps a rapid type of disease.
Bad Taste and Halitosis
Altered sensation of taste can accompany the halitosis that is associated with:
n
necrotising periodontal diseases (necrotising gingivitis/ periodontitis/stomatitis)
n
purulent exudate from a periodontal abscess
n
poor oral hygiene/accumulated food debris from packing beneath open contact points, in furcations, beneath overhanging or leaking restorations and associated with dentures
n
excessive bacterial growth on the dorsal surface of the tongue.
Pain
Acute and often quite severe pain is a feature of necrotising periodontal diseases and herpetic gingivostomatitis. Pain, particularly on eating, is also a symptom of an acute peri­odontal abscess and/or an endodontic–periodontal lesion. Gingival recession with exposure of root surfaces can also precipitate pain if dentine is exposed as a result of tooth­brush abrasion. This pain is characterised as sharp and tran­sient, with a sudden onset that is precipitated by extremes of temperature. Pain is not typically a feature of gingivitis or periodontitis, however.

DENTAL HISTORY

The dental history provides an indication of the patient’s overall attitude to dental care. Lengthy intervals between appointments and attendance for only symptomatic treat­ment suggest a low priority on dental health and a patient who is unlikely to appreciate and comply with comprehen­sive periodontal care.
The reasons for previous loss of teeth should be estab­lished and a record made of previous and recent dental treatment. Information (including radiographs) relating to previous dental treatment should, whenever possible, be sought by written request from a previous dentist, and the written response incorporated in the patient’s notes. An­other criterion sometimes used to assess dental behaviour is the frequency with which a patient brushes (or claims to brush!) their teeth. It is more important to assess the effi­ciency of the method of toothbrushing rather than to place too much emphasis on frequency. An individual who brushes once a day for 4–5 minutes is often able to maintain a superior standard of plaque control (oral hygiene) than a patient who brushes several times a day, but ineffectively and for only short periods of time.
In young patients in particular, a note should be made of previous orthodontic treatment. Extended periods of fixed appliance therapy can cause loss of crestal alveolar bone partly from tooth movements and partly from the periodon­tal inflammation that is a consequence of limited access to cleaning interproximally and subgingivally. More impor­tantly from the diagnostic viewpoint, teeth that have been tipped rather than moved bodily through bone often have an angular alveolar crest on the mesial and distal surfaces. Such topography can give the appearance of the lesions often seen in localised periodontitis.

SOCIAL HISTORY

Details of the patient’s occupation, diet and consumption of alcohol and tobacco should be noted. When an occupa­tion involves considerable social contact, there may be a greater awareness of small changes of tooth position and appearance.
Stress induced by life events (e.g. examinations, divorce or change of employment) should also be noted as they may promote bruxism and aggravate existing tooth mo­bility from periodontal disease. Psychological stress has been shown to be associated with delayed wound healing of connective tissue and bone, necrotising periodontal diseases and periodontitis. As most patients have some element of stress in their lives, the potential influence of this on periodontal diseases should be appreciated. High levels of unmanaged stress, and particularly financial strain, has been implicated as a specific risk factor in peri­odontal disease.
Smoking is a known risk factor for periodontal disease and is considered in Section 1.6. The frequency and dura­tion of smoking should be established and the detrimental effects of smoking on periodontal, oral and general health must be conveyed to the patient before any treatment is started.
It should now be apparent that much of the information that can be derived from a thorough personal and dental history has a bearing on establishing the susceptibility of an individual to periodontal diseases. When potential systemic and environmental factors are established, it is often not possible to determine their individual effects on the disease process because many of the factors are inter-related. For example, an individual who has job insecurity and is under financial strain may be also a smoker and a poor dental attender.

MEDICAL HISTORY

A thorough medical history must be recorded and updated at each visit. The patient’s perception of their present health status is also a valuable indicator of their psycho­logical make-up and potential compliance with treatment.
A patient with a history of rheumatic fever, congenital cardiac defects or prosthetic heart valves does not auto­matically require antibiotic prophylaxis before periodontal probing and treatment. Similarly, patients who have re­ceived prosthetic joint implants do not routinely require antibiotic prophylaxis. Ultrasonic scalers can be used in patients with cardiac pacemakers in accordance with the
1  •  Periodontology
5
manufacturers’ guidance, which normally recommends that the ultrasonic handpiece and cables should be kept at least 15 cm away from the pacemaker device.
Patients with diabetes are at particular risk of periodontal breakdown, especially when poorly controlled. A positive family history should be noted and vigilant periodontal monitoring undertaken sometimes engaging with their dia­betes care team. The patient who is HIV-positive is also at risk of extensive and increased periodontal breakdown.
Patients with particular food fads or unusual diets should be questioned as part of an overall dietary analysis to evalu­ate their vitamin and protein intake. Nutritional deficiencies may modify the severity and extent of periodontal diseases by altering the host resistance and potential for repair, al­though such deficiencies are rare in developed countries.
Gastric hyperacidity and reflux from hiatus hernia and gastric ulceration predispose to erosion and root caries if there is existing gingival recession. Patients who are preg­nant should be monitored carefully during the second and third trimesters as endocrine changes may lead to marked gingival inflammation and the development of epulides. Routine radiographic assessment of periodontal disease should be avoided during pregnancy.
Current medications must be noted, especially dosage and types of medication. When a patient is receiving anticoagu­lant therapy, the general medical practitioner or patient’s physician must be consulted with a view to managing the anticoagulant dosage to coincide with invasive periodontal treatment, thus reducing the risk of postoperative haemor­rhage. Some drugs such as phenytoin, ciclosporin and nifedipine can cause gingival enlargement, which may com­promise good oral hygiene, leading to aesthetic problems. For patients with a history of or currently taking intravenous bisphosphonates, oral bisphosphonates with immunosup­pressants or a previous history of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), extractions and periodon­tal surgery should be carefully considered to manage any risk of BRONJ. Any antimicrobials used in the treatment of periodontal diseases are contraindicated for certain patients for whom the unwanted effects of the drugs may be en­hanced, or because of a potential interaction with drugs that the patient is already taking.

EXAMINATION

Extraoral Examination
A careful extraoral examination may reveal important signs that are associated with periodontal problems. A se­vere periodontal abscess can lead to facial swelling and a regional lymphadenopathy. Prominent maxillary incisors make a lip seal difficult to achieve and this may aggravate an existing gingivitis. The drying effect on exposed gingiva produced by mouth breathing leads to enlarged and ery­thematous gingiva, particularly in the maxillary anterior region. Mouth breathing does not inevitably lead to in­creased plaque accumulation and gingivitis but should be regarded as a predisposing factor in a susceptible patient.
Intraoral Examination
A record should be made of local factors that predispose to the accumulation of plaque (e.g. restorations with overhanging
margins, poorly contoured and deficient restorations and partial dentures).
A quick and simple method of assessing the level of oral hygiene is to score, after disclosing, the number of plaque­covered smooth tooth surfaces as a percentage of all smooth surfaces. On each surface, plaque is recorded as being either present or absent (a dichotomous scoring method). Patients are informed of their scores and realistic targets can be set for the patient to achieve at future visits. This method gives a useful overall assessment of plaque control as well as identifying tooth surfaces that are difficult to clean. These occur typically at interproximal sites and on the lingual smooth surfaces of mandibular molars.
In epidemiological studies, it is easier and quicker to select six teeth per subject to be broadly representative of the en­tire dentition. These so-called Ramfjord teeth are:
A number of indices have been used for scoring plaque,
6 14
41 6
oral debris and calculus on a quantitative basis (Table 1.1). Periodontal diseases and gingivitis occur in all patients re­gardless of age. Periodontitis is prevalent in adults and gingivitis is extremely common in children. Furthermore, some children and young adults are also at risk from the more severe, rapid progressing periodontal diseases. It is, therefore, imperative that all dental patients undergo a screening examination to provide a rapid, basic assessment of periodontal status. The Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE) has evolved from the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) and is a quick method for as­sessing a patient’s periodontal status. The examination in­volves the use of a specially designed periodontal probe with a 0.5-mm diameter ball end and a coloured band ex­tending 3.5–5.5 mm from the tip (Fig. 1.2). The dentition is divided into sextants; each tooth is probed circumferentially and only the highest score in each sextant is recorded. The score codes are used as a guide to determine the need for periodontal treatment (Table 1.2). A BPE score of 3 means that full probing depths (six sites per tooth) around all the teeth in that sextant should be recorded. A score of 4 in any sextant means that probing depths should be recorded throughout the entire dentition.
Gingiva
Visual examination of the gingiva may reveal colour changes of the tissues, gingival swelling (generalised or lo­calised), ulceration, suppuration and gingival recession. Where there is gingival enlargement, the tissues should be probed gently to assess consistency and texture. Oedema­tous tissues are soft and may have a tendency to bleed spon­taneously or following pressure and gentle manipulation. Conversely, fibrous tissue is usually quite firm and resistant to pressure.
The width of attached gingiva should be assessed and measured as the distance from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival line minus the depth of the gingival crev­ice (in health) or periodontal pocket (when disease is pre­sent). Sites with minimal or no apparent attached gingiva should be noted together with the inflammatory condition of the associated marginal tissues. At such sites, the at­tached gingiva can be dyed with Schiller’s iodine solution so that the border between the keratinised (orange) and non­keratinised (dark blue) epithelium (mucogingival junction)
6
0.5mm
Master Dentistry
Table 1.1 Indices for Scoring Oral Debris, Plaque and Calculus.
Index Deposit Scoring System Score
Plaque index (Silness and Löe 1964)
Plaque index (Quigley and Hein 1962)
Oral hygiene index (Greene and Vermillion 1960)
Volpe–Manhold index (VMI 1969)
Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The oral hygiene index: a method for classifying oral hygiene status.
Comparative cleaning efficiency of manual and power brushing. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. effectiveness of potential calculus inhibiting agents.
Plaque 0 no plaque
Plaque 0 no plaque
Scores debris and calculus as separate com­ponents
Calculus The height and width of calculus is measured with a
1 film of plaque seen with disclosing solution or by running probe along surface 2 moderate accumulation seen with naked eye 3 abundance of plaque in pocket and on tooth surface
1 separate flecks at cervical margin 2 continuous band of plaque 1 mm wide at cervical margin 3 band of plaque 1 mm wide but covering 1/3 of coronal tooth surface 4 plaque on 1/3 but 2/3 of coronal surface 5 plaque on 2/3 of coronal tooth surface
0 no deposits 1 not covering more than 1/3 of exposed tooth surface 2 coronal deposits 1/3 but 2/3 of tooth surface; individual flecks of subgingival calculus 3 deposits on 2/3 tooth surface; continuous band of subgingival calculus
graduated probe along three planes on the lingual surfaces of six lower anterior teeth
J Am Dental Assoc.
Acta Odont Scand.
N Y State Dental J.
1962;28:289–290.
1964;24:747–759 and Volpe AR, Manhold JH. A method of evaluating the
J Am Dental Assoc.
1962;65:26–29; Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II.
1960;61:172–179; Quigley GA, Hein JW.
Record on six surfaces of tooth Divide total by number of surfaces scored
Record scores on six surfaces of each tooth Divide total by number of sur­faces scored
Scores made on facial and lin­gual surfaces Record worst score/sextant Index 5 total scores/number of sextants
Any calculus scores 0.5 mm Index is the sum of the individ­ual measurements divided by the number of scores made
5.5mm
3.5mm
Table 1.2 The Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE).
Code* Probing Treatment Needs
0 Coloured area of the probe is com-
pletely visible; no calculus detected; no gingival bleeding on probing
1 Coloured area is completely visible;
no calculus detected; bleeding on probing
2 Coloured area is completely visible;
supra- or subgingival calculus detected, or overhanging restorations
3 Coloured area is partly visible,
indicating probing depth of greater than 3.5 mm but less than 5.5 mm
4 Coloured area completely disappears,
indicating probing depth of greater than 5.5 mm
The symbol (*) should be added to score where furcation involvement is
evident.
RSI
, Root surface instrumentation.
Reproduced by kind permission of the British Society of Periodontology and
Implant Dentistry.
No need for peri­odontal treatment
Oral hygiene instruction (OHI)
OHI; elimination of plaque-retentive areas; scaling and RSI
OHI; elimination of plaque-retentive areas; RSI
Assess the need for more complex treat­ment in addition to OHI and RSI; referral to a specialist may be necessary
Fig. 1.2 Colour-coded probe for the basic periodontal examination. (World Health Organization
(WHO)
probe.)
is seen and the actual width of keratinised tissue becomes more readily apparent. Sites of gingival recession are recorded by measuring from the CEJ to the free gingival margin of the affected site. Sensitivity of associated exposed root surfaces should also be recorded.