Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5523_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
34 Мб
Скачать
Anterior mandible
35
25
(mm)(mm)(mm)(mm)
15
4  •  Prosthodontics
Labial
5
117
Posterior mandible
Anterior maxilla
10
20
15
25
5
0
5 10
(mm)
5
(mm)
(mm)
15
010
VIVIIIII VI
Buccal
VIVIIIII VI
VIVIIIII VI
Posterior maxilla
10
0
010
(mm)
Fig. 4.1 A classification system for edentulous jaws. (Reprinted from Cawood JI, Howell RA. Reconstructive preprosthetic surgery I. Anatomical consider- ations.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
Close-fitting (0.6 mm spacer) light-cured trays for use with zinc oxide/eugenol paste can be requested. If extensive undercuts are present, a spaced tray for alginate or silicone may be required.
borders. The peripheral border of all trays should finish
2 mm short of the depth of the sulcus recorded by the pri­mary impression, when the spacer is in place. This is an estimate of the position of the mucogingival line and will assist the clinician in recording the functional sulcus depth in the master impression.
1991;20:75–82 with permission from Elsevier.)
Visit 2: Master Impressions
The master impression should record detail of the denture-bearing area together with the depth and width of the functional sulcus so that the finished denture maintains an effective facial or border seal. In some cases, the tray will require modification to its peripheral border and this should be carried out using a material of sufficient viscosity to be mouldable and self-supporting such as medium body silicone, silicone putty or greenstick compound prior to the impression being recorded.
VIVIIIII VI
118
Ribbon wax
Master Dentistry
Greenstick may also be used to create functional post­dam recording. A layer of greenstick is placed along the posterior 2–3 mm of the fitting surface aligning with the vibrating line of the hard soft palate junction. This dif­ferentially compresses the tissues in this area. Care is then taken to remove any excess material extending be­yond the vibrating line. An advantage of this thermo­plastic material is that it can be modified without the need to re-take areas which have failed to adequately capture the functional sulcus, as would be the case with any of the set elastomers. The final impression is taken with the material selected, ideally those with hydrophilic low viscosity properties which will record surface detail. Low viscosity silicones are often used, but alginate may also be effective.
These impressions are not to be considered complete until ribbon wax is placed approximately 2 mm from the periphery of the impression in order to provide a land area and protect the width of the sulcus on the resultant mas­ter cast. This placement of ribbon wax is called beading (Fig. 4.2). In the cases where alginate is used, a line must be drawn with indelible pencil on the facial surface of the impression 2 mm from the periphery for the same reason. This area must not be removed!
It is always advisable after pouring the master casts to retain the individual trays until all treatment has been completed.
Laboratory Prescription
Casts should be poured in dental stone and a prescription provided regarding the construction of occlusal rims. The material to be used for the occlusal rim bases must be specified. This may be temporary, but sufficiently stable and robust as to avoid distortion during any of the future clinical and laboratory stages; for this reason wax only bases and occlusal rims are best avoided. A temporary base is discarded before final processing of the denture. Alternatively, permanent acrylic bases offer the advantage of allowing a check of the comfort and retention of the final denture to be assessed at an early stage, as well as optimising the accuracy of recording jaw relations. Where problems are identified and new impressions indicated these are undertaken without involving unnecessary use of additional clinical time. The disadvantages are addi­tional cost and the small possibility of distortion (about 1%) of the permanent base during a second cure when the denture is flasked and packed (Fenlon et al, 2008). This can largely be avoided, however, by use of stone capping during processing.
Fig. 4.2 Positioning of red ribbon wax for beading to create a land area on a master model.
Visit 3: Recording Jaw Relations
Before embarking on this stage it is important to refer back to the treatment plan and to verify with the patient that what you are doing meets their requirements.
Clinical Procedure
Wax rims should ideally be provided on heat-cured bases, or failing that an alternative rigid temporary base. If the oc­clusal rims are constructed on acrylic bases, the fitting surfaces should be examined for sharp edges and excessive undercuts. A permanent heat-cured base offers the oppor­tunity to effectively check and modify the retention and stability of the base, and to determine if a second master impression is required. If the acrylic resin has been ex­tended into bony undercuts, disclosing wax or pressure re­lief cream may be used to locate any area requiring adjust­ment. To minimise any distortion of the wax, the use of a rigid base is important, as is ensuring it does not become too warm in the oral environment; removing it regularly and gentle cooling will assist with this.
The upper record rim is adjusted so that:
n
lip support is correct
n
incisal height is correct
n
occlusal plane is correct (parallel to the lower ridge, alar-tragus and interpupillary lines)
n
labial and buccal contour is correct (allowing for buccal corridors to be present)
n
the centre line is marked and lateral check marks to verify reproducibility of the path of closure.
The presence of dentures in the mouth will modify the rest position of the mandible. Measurements of the resting face height should normally be made with the upper rim in place.
The lower rim should be adjusted to correct the bucco­lingual contour posteriorly and correct the labial contour anteriorly. The rim should sit in the neutral zone. It should be trimmed to establish even, bilateral contact along the retruded arc of closure (centric relation). In this respect, the patient should be asked to close until the rims first con­tact. Excessive pressure may cause them to tilt or be dis­placed into the alveolar mucosa, giving the appearance of even contact when, in fact, it does not exist. In some cases, the patient may be helped to find the retruded arc by ask­ing them to curl the tongue back to contact the posterior border of the upper occlusal rim. An assessment should be made of both resting vertical dimension and occlusal verti­cal dimension. This may be assessed from facial appear­ance and confirmed from an estimation made using some kind of measurement from two facial reference points, commonly using a Willis gauge. This should identify an adequate interocclusal clearance or freeway space. In an elderly patient who has been a denture wearer for many years, often providing slightly more freeway space can be beneficial.
When satisfied that the patient is consistently occluding on the retruded arc of closure at the correct vertical dimen­sion of occlusion, make locating marks in the midline and buccally in the canine region. Remove the rims and place them together outside the mouth using the locating marks. The jaw relation is now ready to be recorded: locating
4  •  Prosthodontics
119
indices are cut into the occlusal rims to aid rearticulating once the record blocks are removed from the mouth.
The rims are placed in the mouth and a thin layer of silicone jaw registration material or a similar recording material is applied along the entirety of the lower rim. Sta­bilise the rims with fingers and encourage the patient to close into retruded jaw relation (check locating marks are coincident) and wait until the material has set. After re­moving rims from the mouth, check that casts can be placed into the rims without any premature contacts dis­tally, either between the heels of the casts or between the posterior extensions of the denture bases (avoidance of heel clash). Also ensure that the rims can be separated and relocated accurately.
Select teeth that are an appropriate shade and mould for the patient. Reference may be made to previous dentures if the patient was happy with their appearance.
If a functional impression of the posterior extension of the upper denture has not been used, a post dam is cut into the master cast prior to final processing. If the patient has consistently had problems with complete dentures or had a gross skeletal abnormality, it may be worth considering us­ing a face-bow registration of the upper rim to allow for a more reliable location of the cast on the articulator in the laboratory, although there is little evidence to show this is of benefit. Use of permanent bases to optimise stability and retention of the record blocks should also be considered.
Laboratory Prescription
Record the shade, mould and material to be used for the arti­ficial teeth on the laboratory card. Indicate the type of articu­lator (average movement or semi-adjustable) on which the dentures are to be set up and indicate any aspects of the an­terior tooth setup that are to be copied in the trial dentures. Indicate the type of bases required for the trial dentures. All casts should be mounted using a split-cast technique.
Visit 4: Trial Dentures
An examination of the completed setup on the articulator should be carried out before trying in the mouth, and any discrepancies noted. If the trial dentures are not correct on the articulator, this must be evaluated before a decision to proceed to place these trial dentures in the patient’s mouth. If some technical or occlusal fault is evident a decision about how to effectively rectify this is required.
In the mouth, carry out a complete assessment of the trial dentures including the following:
n
Stability and retention, more difficult to assess when us­ing temporary bases. When using a permanent base this should verify that the retention and stability are consis­tent with your finding during recoding of jaw relations.
n
Peripheral extension.
n
Positioning of teeth in relation to neutral zone and shape of polished surfaces.
n
Occlusion should be assessed visually (articulating paper is not necessary at this stage, but care must be taken to stabilise the bases on their respective supporting tissues). Occlusal interferences may displace denture bases away from the tissues disguising occlusal errors.
n
Verify with the patient that the contact feels even and simultaneous.
n
Interocclusal clearance to give a satisfactory freeway space. Speech sounds and mouth feel give clues as to the appropriateness of this.
n
Appearance including the shade, mould and position of the anterior teeth and the contour of the labial flanges; check that the appearance is natural (a completely even arrangement of teeth usually looks unnatural), and mod­ify if necessary.
n
Recheck occlusion if the positions of the anterior teeth have been modified as this may result in occlusal inter­ference.
After carrying out any necessary corrections, obtain the patient’s comments. Do not proceed to finish unless the patient is satisfied, especially with the appearance (record this in the notes).
Anything other than minor localised discrepancies of occlusion and vertical dimension will require a new jaw registration using the trial denture as an occlusal rim. A decision about what has caused the error will determine which teeth will need to be removed and replaced with wax, before once more sealing them together using occlu­sal registration paste prior to rearticulating the casts and resetting the teeth.
The dentures would then proceed to being reset and tried in again at the next visit. It is important to have an ap­proach which uses the ‘try in’ stage as an opportunity to confirm that all of the planned treatment objectives have either been achieved or that those which conflict with other objectives have been agreed and discussed with the patient. Any such discussion should highlight that compromises have been agreed between both clinician and patient.
Final Laboratory Prescription
The prescription should state definitely whether dentures can be finished or if a further trial is required. If the jaw relationship has been re-recorded, the casts are remounted on the articulator and a second trial stage is carried out. When the dentures are processed, use of the split-cast tech­nique will minimise occlusal errors during processing.
Porosity
One of the possible faults that can occur in the laboratory is porosity within the acrylic resin or tooth movement during the processing cycle.
Contraction porosity results when insufficient acrylic dough has been placed to create an excess or flash. Alterna­tively, the application of insufficient pressure during curing can lead to porosity voids dispersed throughout the whole mass of the denture base.
Gaseous porosity results when the temperature of the dough is raised significantly above the boiling point of the monomer (100 degrees Celsius), producing spherical voids in the hottest part of the curing dough. This occurs most commonly in the lingual flanges of a lower denture.
Granular porosity results from evaporation of the mono­mer during preparation. Proportioning of the powder to liquid ratio is dependent on allowing each powder particle to become wetted by the monomer. The mixture is left to stand until it reaches the right consistency suitable for packing into the gypsum mould. During this standing pe­riod, a lid should be placed on the mixing vessel to prevent
120
Master Dentistry
evaporation of the monomer. Loss of monomer during this stage can produce granular porosity in the set material, which is characterised by a blotchy opaque surface.
Visit 5: Final Dentures
The processed dentures should be checked for any sharp edges, acrylic ‘pearls’ or excessive undercuts on the fitting surface. Insert each denture separately and check on fit and comfort to the patient. An examination of the occlusion in the mouth can be done either visually or using articulating paper.
Visual assessment is made by observing and by asking the patient if the teeth are meeting with equal pressure on both sides of the mouth when the mouth is closed gently.
Articulating paper is used to confirm these findings and to precisely locate any premature contacts. A heavy mark made by the paper may indicate where the initial contact is being made. Fossa rather than cusp tips should be ground at this stage only. Beware of artefacts, such as those pro­duced by tilting of the dentures. This would produce marks from the articulating paper on both sides of the mouth, whereas initial observations may have indicated that the first occlusal contact is only on one side.
If any occlusal faults are diagnosed, it is liable to be a clinical and not a laboratory error providing that the split­cast technique has been used. Relatively minor occlusal discrepancies may be adjusted at the chair side until:
n
the occlusal pressure on both sides of the mouth is the same
n
the occlusal contacts indicated by articulating paper are primarily on the premolar and first molar teeth; heavy contacts distally or anteriorly should be avoided as these may cause tipping of the dentures
n
lateral and protrusive movement is possible without cus­pal interference causing displacement of the dentures.
Significant chair-side occlusal adjustments are particu­larly difficult; where there is any doubt, a check record should be obtained. This often saves time if a large occlusal error is found at the initial insertion stage.
Check Record
A check record is advisable for the correction of occlusal er­rors that are too large to adjust easily at the chair side. This technique is also more reliable and accurate than major adjustment made at the chair side using articulating paper. Narrowed wax wafers, constructed from one thickness of pink modelling wax, are sealed to the occlusal surfaces of the lower posterior teeth and adjusted so that the patient occludes evenly on the wafers in retruded jaw relation with the teeth separated by a distance less than the freeway space. The teeth should not penetrate through the wax; otherwise tooth contact may cause displacement of the dentures and/ or the mandible. This occlusal registration may be refined using registration paste. The dentures are then remounted on an articulator.
The articulator is closed with the incisal pin removed, and the occlusal contacts are checked visually and with articulating paper. Adjustments are carried out until an even occlusion is obtained. The dentures are reinserted and the occlusion checked in the mouth.
evidence base for this clinical approach to complete denture construction. As with lots of areas of clinical dentistry,
there is little evidence to support clinical approaches rec­ommended; however, the following does suggest that mas­ter impressions may not be required to provide the same degree of patient satisfaction.
simple complete denture techniques can provide patient
satisfaction. When complete dentures are required, are
simplified techniques as effective as complex traditional ones for their manufacture? A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was carried out in a hospital environment by Kawai
et al (2005). A total of 122 edentulous individuals, aged
45–75 years, were randomly allocated into groups to re­ceive dentures made using either traditional or simplified techniques. Individuals allocated to the traditional arm had a final impression taken in a custom-made tray and a face­bow recording and a semi-adjustable articulator were used, with articulator remount after delivery. Those in the simpli­fied technique group had impressions taken in stock trays and no face-bow recording and a monoplane articulator were used, with no articulator remount after delivery. There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient ratings for overall satisfaction at 3 or 6 months. These results suggest the use of simplified techniques, which are easier to master and which should reduce treat­ment costs.
critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics
(carlsson 2009)
n
A scrutiny of the prosthodontic literature indicates that many common clinical procedures lack scientific sup­port. In the era of evidence-based dentistry, ineffective interventions should be eliminated and decisions should be made on best available evidence.
n
Studies have demonstrated that dentists’ and patients’ interpersonal appraisals of each other were most signifi­cant factors, accounting for patients’ evaluation of treat­ment outcome.
n
Reviews of the literature on this topic have suggested that the creation of a good relationship with the patient seems to be more important than a technically perfect denture construction for achieving patient satisfaction.

ADVICE TO PATIENTS

Instructions in respect of new dentures should be discussed with your patient after the final dentures have been in­serted, preferably using a printed leaflet. In particular, the importance of good denture hygiene should be emphasised. If an immersion cleaner is recommended, a hypochlorite type is the most suitable. Any mechanical cleaning should be done with a brush that allows access and has good adaptability to all surfaces of the denture.
If the patient has to leave the new dentures out because of pain or soreness, request that the dentures be worn for 24 hours before the review appointment, in order that the cause of the discomfort may be more readily detected. Un­der no circumstances should the patient attempt adjust­ment of the dentures.
Denture Maintenance
Unfortunately, evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of removable complete denture prostheses do
4  •  Prosthodontics
121
not exist. Based on the best available evidence, the following are guidelines for the care and maintenance of dentures (Felton et al 2011):
1. Careful daily removal of the bacterial biofilm present in the oral cavity and on complete dentures is of para­mount importance to minimise denture stomatitis and to help contribute to good oral and general health.
2. To reduce levels of biofilm and potentially harmful bacteria and fungi, patients who wear dentures should do the following:
a. Dentures should be cleaned daily by soaking and
brushing with an effective, non-abrasive denture cleanser.
b. Denture cleansers should ONLY be used to clean
dentures outside of the mouth.
c. Dentures should always be thoroughly rinsed after
soaking and brushing with denture-cleansing solu­tions prior to reinsertion into the oral cavity. Always follow the product usage instructions.
3. Although the evidence is weak, dentures should be cleaned annually by a dentist or dental professional by using ultrasonic cleansers to minimise biofilm accu­mulation over time.
4. Dentures should never be placed in boiling water.
5. Dentures should not be soaked in sodium hypochlorite bleach, or in products containing sodium hypochlorite, for periods that exceed 10 minutes. Placement of den­tures in sodium hypochlorite solutions for periods lon­ger than 10 minutes may damage dentures.
6. Dentures should be stored and immersed in water after cleaning, when not replaced in the oral cavity, to avoid warping.
7. Denture adhesives, when properly used, can improve the retention and stability of dentures and help seal out the accumulation of food particles beneath the
8. In a quality-of-life study, patient ratings showed that denture adhesives may improve the denture wearer’s perceptions of retention, stability and quality of life; however, there is insufficient evidence that adhesives improve masticatory function.
9. Evidence regarding the effects of denture adhesives on the oral tissues when used for periods longer than 6 months is lacking. Thus, extended use of denture adhesives should not be considered without periodic assessment of denture quality and health of the sup­porting tissues by a dentist, prosthodontist or dental professional.
10. Improper use of zinc-containing denture adhesives may have adverse systemic effects. Therefore, as a pre­cautionary measure, zinc-containing denture adhe­sives should be avoided.
11. Denture adhesives should be used only in sufficient quantities on each denture to provide sufficient added retention and stability to the prostheses.
12. Denture adhesives should be completely removed from the prosthesis and the oral cavity on a daily basis.
13. If increasing amounts of adhesives are required to achieve the same level of denture retention, the patient should see a dentist or dental professional to evaluate the fit and stability of the dentures.
14. While existing studies provide conflicting results, it is not recommended that dentures be worn continuously (24 hours per day) in an effort to reduce or minimise denture stomatitis.
15. Patients who wear dentures should be checked annu­ally by the dentist, prosthodontist or dental profes­sional for maintenance of optimum denture fit and function, for evaluation for oral lesions and bone loss and for assessment of oral health status.

COMMON COMPLAINTS OF THE EDENTULOUS PATIENT

Most prosthetic complaints can be prevented or minimised by adequate diagnosis, treatment planning and treatment plus attention to detail during the construction phase. A pre­prosthetic radiographic investigation can prevent the finding of retained roots, unerupted teeth and bone pathology after the new dentures have been constructed; however, this should not be done as a matter of course. Pretreatment case history and clinical investigation with a detailed assessment of any existing dentures should aid the resolution of such problems as correct face height, tooth position and polished contour. However, problems and complaints will still occur with new dentures. Table 4.2 lists some of the more common complaints, their probable causes and suggested treatment.

RELINES OR REBASES

A reline involves the addition of a material to the fitting surface of a denture base. A rebase involves the removal and replacement of virtually all the denture base, namely the fitting and polished surface of the denture. There are always risks with both relining and rebasing that the resul­tant denture may be made worse. There are few indications these days for a full rebase as it is often more satisfactory to consider a copy technique of the denture that would have been rebased. This will not necessitate the removal of the denture from the patient.
Advantages of a Reline
n
Can be done at the chair side or in the laboratory
n
Can be permanent or temporary
n
Will improve the retention of an ill-fitting denture
n
A resilient lining can be added to a previous denture base
Advantages of a Rebase
n
Will not increase the thickness of the palate
n
Will remove the majority of the previous denture base if, for example, bleaching has occurred

4.2 Copy/Duplicate Dentures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You should:
• understand the indications and advantages of a copy/
duplicate denture technique over a more conventional approach to complete denture construction
• appreciate the clinical and technical stages involved in
such a technique.
122
Master Dentistry
Table 4.2 Common Complaints of Patients With Dentures.
Complaint Probable Cause Treatment
Generalised discomfort over the denture-bearing areas
Lack of chewing pressure, ‘collapsed face’, generalised facial discomfort
Angular cheilitis Lack of facial support (rarely occlusal face height). Maceration
Pain over crest of ridge (espe­cially lower anterior region)
Localised pain Irregular soft tissue following socketed immediate dentures Relieve/reline. Consider pre-prosthetic surgery
Pain in sulcus
Ulcer Overextension Relieve
Denture-induced hyperplasia Overextension Severe relief; may not resolve, then surgery
Localised pain in lower premolar region
Pain on one side Premature contact, poor articulation Analyse occlusion (check record) and articula-
Pain from cheek and tongue Teeth not set in neutral zone; especially if no horizontal
Denture displaces on opening or in speech
Upper denture Inadequate post dam Trace and reprocess or cold cure
Lower denture Incorrect shape of polished surfaces Recontour
Speech defect New F/F Encouragement and perseverance
Poor mastication Worn teeth increase in freeway space Correct OVD-remake
Dry mouth Systemic factors and medication Salivary substitute
General inability to accommodate
Increased occlusal face height Occlusal adjustment or, more commonly, remake
Occlusal interference in lateral and protrusive movements Balanced articulation with free sliding contact
Movement of denture bases over basal tissues Reline/remake using copy technique
Incorrect anteroposterior relationship of dentures (i.e. non-coincidence of tooth and muscular positions)
Increased free monomer Remake with correct curing cycle
Decreased occlusal face height Use cold-cure acrylic (occlusal pivots) or splint
of cutaneous tissues by repeated wetting of angular folds This may lead to superinfection with
Irregular bony contour following abnormal healing pattern X-ray for diagnostic and treatment planning,
Irregularities on fitting surface Adjustment
Premature contact Occlusal adjustment
Buried roots, unerupted teeth, cysts, etc. X-ray, surgery
Excess undercut utilised Partial blocking out of undercut. Localised use
Pressure on superficial mental nerve Relieve denture, surgery: repositioning only to
overlap
Overextension of border Reduce border, develop new border and re-
Underextension of border Develop new border and replace in acrylic resin
Anterior teeth too far forward of ridge Reposition anterior teeth, F/F will probably
Excessively deep post dam Remove excess and polish post-dam area
Interference of coronoid process on opening Reduce thickness of flange
Bulky flange Reduce thickness of flange
Excessive thickness of flange in region of modiolus Reduce
Posterior teeth outside neutral zone Reduce width of teeth or remake
Insufficient room for tongue Increase/remake
Lack of freeway space Correct OVD-remake
Adaptive capacity: age, oral dryness, high oral awareness Meticulous attention to detail and encouragement
Errors in occlusal vertical dimension Correct errors in OVD
Psychological factors
Change in denture shape Consider copy technique
Staphylococcus aureus
Occlusal adjustment
to build up occlusal face height then remake one or both dentures
Build up canine prominence or move anterior teeth forward; use antifungal cream; increase denture hygiene
osteoplastic surgery
of soft lining material
be used in exceptional cases Resilient lining Viability of implant supported denture
tion, then adjust
Reduce width of teeth and provide horizontal overlap
place in acrylic resin
have to be remade
Reduce thickness of denture to provide more tongue space Speech analysis and adjustment
Table 4.2 Common Complaints of Patients With Dentures.—cont’d
Complaint Probable Cause Treatment
Nausea Denture extended onto soft palate Reduce
Lack of retention Correct
Reduced tongue space Recontour polished surface
Inability to accept such a large amount of acrylic Horseshoe design for upper
‘Teeth meet too soon’, ‘can’t open mouth far enough for food’
Appearance Insufficient attention at try-in Correct
Denture stomatitis Ill-fitting denture Reline/remake
Midline fracture Ill-fitting dentures Reline/remake
OVD
, Occlusal vertical dimension.
Increased occlusal face height Reduce or remake F/F
Unwillingness of patient to put function before aesthetics Attempt to reach understanding
Fungal infection Denture hygiene; antifungal cream
Increased free monomer Remake: correct curing cycle
Teeth set excessively off the ridge Remake
F/– against lower standing teeth Metal palate/sufficient overjet
Fatigue Rebase
4  •  Prosthodontics
123
The process of history taking and examination of the pa­tient and their existing dentures presents valuable informa­tion about the patients’ previous denture-wearing success. Recognising the limitations of an existing denture whilst noting any successful aspects may inform the choice of a conventional technique of denture construction, which in­corporates some of the beneficial features of the existing denture. Patients who have worn dentures satisfactorily over a long period of time and have developed a neuromus­cular feedback in relationship to the spatial relationship of the denture to the surrounding tissues may benefit from a copy denture technique. In this respect, however, it is impor­tant to realise that the copy denture does not simply repli­cate the current dentures worn by the patient. It is designed specifically to reproduce the favourable aspects of the cur­rent prosthesis such as tooth position and polished surfaces, while improving the adaptation and occlusion. Copy den­tures are particularly useful for elderly patients with good denture-wearing experience. There are numerous ways to reproduce beneficial features of existing dentures incorpo­rating both conventional remake and copy techniques. These range from the use of impressions to create models of anterior tooth setup, shape and size of teeth, to using an Alma gauge to measure the incisal height and labial position of anterior teeth to reproduce lip support and aesthetics.

INDICATIONS

There are a number of situations where copy dentures are advisable:
n
Correct position of teeth in the neutral zone or correct zone of adaptation and the polished surfaces are satis­factory
n
Loss of retention in otherwise favourable dentures re­quiring replacement
n
Wear of the occlusal surfaces
n
Replacement of immediate dentures
n
Spare set of dentures. This might be a consideration for patients who live in care homes and who have cognitive impairment.
Typical dental history that would suggest an indication
for copy dentures:
n
Elderly patients presenting with satisfactory complete dentures
n
Worn occlusal surfaces, indicating long-term acceptabil­ity without significant loss of occlusal vertical dimen­sion and change in the horizontal jaw relationship
n
Deterioration of denture base materials
n
Patient requests ‘spare set’ of dentures
n
Patients with a history of denture problems make controlled modifications to copy previously most successful dentures.
Clinical Advantages
n
No alteration or mutilation of existing dentures
n
No period for the patient without their dentures (as com­pared to a reline or rebase)
n
Three clinical stages
n
Simple duplication procedure, less time than conven­tional impressions
Technical Advantages
n
No individual trays or record blocks required
n
Infrequent rearticulation of teeth for try-in necessary
n
Elimination of repolishing after border adjustments
n
No thickening of palate in the finished denture, as oc­curs in some reline procedures

ALGINATE COPY BOX/SILICONE COPY TECHNIQUE

First Clinical Stage
Any modifications are made at the first clinical stage (Box 4.1).
124
Master Dentistry
Box 4.1 Technique for Copying Existing Denture.
1. Correct any under- or overextension using greenstick or acrylic border moulding material.
2. Add labial flange (if required) to open face denture using impression compound.
3. Use a wax wafer to provide desired occlusal face height and decide whether increase to be on F/ alone or /F alone or shared between the two.
4. Choose shade.
5. Copy denture utilising alginate and copy boxes (Fig. 4.3).
6. Send copy boxes to laboratory with prescription.
Laboratory Stage
Wax-acrylic replicas are poured by adding wax into the mould to 1 mm past the gingival margins of the teeth and allowed to set. The base of the wax is then scored and self­cured acrylic is poured into the closed mould through pre­viously cut sprue holes and allowed to polymerise. A stone duplicate is cast into the mould once the wax and acrylic copy has been removed. This stone mould can be used for
comparison of the copy try-in. The denture templates are then removed from the moulds and articulated using the wax wafer provided. The wax teeth are then removed and replaced by acrylic denture teeth of appropriate shade and mould. This will provide trial dentures for the second clini­cal stage. Grooves are cut in the palate and filled in with wax (Fig. 4.4) to allow removal of the palate at a later stage.
Second Clinical Stage
At the second clinical stage, the trial dentures are assessed by the clinician and the patient and any errors in occlusion or tooth position are corrected, necessitating a retry. When the trial dentures are satisfactory, they should be prepared for impression taking. This involves removing any undercuts, reduction of the peripheral border and modification using greenstick or a border-moulding self-cured acrylic resin. The polished surfaces of the replica are coated with yellow petro­leum jelly. Wash impressions are recorded using zinc oxide/ eugenol or low-viscosity elastomer (if hard tissue undercuts are present in the mouth) using the closed-mouth technique. Occlusal relationships should be maintained. The position, width and depth of the required post dam are determined.
A
B
C
Fig. 4.3 Denture copied by insertion in a copy box. (A) Coating the polished surface with alginate to avoid air inclusion. (B) Seating the denture to be copied, aligning it with the sprue holes and ensuring slow seating to exclude air. (C) Excess alginate extruded above the level of the flange periphery should be trimmed back.
4  •  Prosthodontics

4.3 Immediate Replacement Dentures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You should:
• understand the concept of immediate replacement
dentures
• comprehend the clinical stages involved in immediate
denture construction.
125
Fig. 4.4 Grooves cut in the palate to allow its removal later.
Final Laboratory Stage
The functional borders are preserved and stone casts are poured. The acrylic palate is removed and an even-thick­ness palate is waxed up.
Third Clinical Stage
The new dentures are checked for fit, extension and occlu­sion. A subsequent review is arranged.

COMMON PROBLEMS

The dentist may have several problems:
n
Unfamiliarity with technique leading to failure to use closed-mouth technique with light and even occlusal contact
n
Attempting a copy denture technique in a patient for whom it is clearly not indicated
n
Copy flasks; some flasks are costly, but if they are used frequently and repeatedly the cost is minimal
n
Forgetting to take the shade
n
Finding a laboratory that is comfortable with the tech­nique, fees additional to conventional complete denture construction charged by the laboratory
n
Inadequate information on the prescription.
Similarly, certain problems are encountered by techni-
cians:
n
Duplicating the dentures; many laboratories duplicate the denture completely in wax or self-cured acrylic. Wax will distort especially at the stage of closed-mouth impressions
n
Articulating the copy
n
Setting up, copying the previous arrangement
n
Waxing up
n
Finishing, removing the palate and replacing a wax palate
n
Grinding of denture teeth to fit acrylic base
n
Registration problems
n
Fees in comparison to the laboratory fee and the time taken to provide treatment.
There is no published evidence base available comparing conventional techniques to this approach to suggest that a copy/duplicate denture technique is superior.
An immediate denture is defined as a denture that is made prior to the extraction of the natural teeth and which is inserted into the mouth immediately after the extraction of those teeth. It may involve total or partial replacement. Generally it is unacceptable to patients that they should be rendered edentulous without replacement of teeth for func­tional and aesthetic reasons. As overall dental health has generally improved, the total removal of teeth followed by the provision of complete dentures has become less com­mon. It is now more usual to provide simple immediate ad­ditions to existing dentures or to provide an immediate partial denture which then transitions gradual tooth loss with future additions. A transitional denture may therefore be considered one which is designed as a partial denture, to which teeth of doubtful prognosis might be added, as they fail; the ultimate prognosis is for complete tooth loss within that arch.
Over the last 10 years we have seen a shift in the delivery of removable immediate dentures to immediate loaded implant-retained prostheses, in situations where good pri­mary stability of implants has been achieved. These are generally a fixed alternative to the traditional removable immediate denture. However, whilst this represents a treat­ment option which may be beyond the affordability of many patients, it nevertheless offers significant advantages in terms of psychosocial adaptation, quality of life, bone preservation and functionality. Treatment planning for tooth loss, final restoration, long-term maintenance and optimisation of implant placement requires specialised clin­ical skills beyond the scope of this chapter.

ADVANTAGES OF IMMEDIATE DENTURES

There are several advantages for the patient:
n
Maintenance of the soft tissue contour of the face:
n
dentures will support the soft tissues around the face in their correct position once teeth are lost and thereby prevent collapse of facial tissues
n
Maintenance of mental and physical wellbeing:
n
the patient is not seen to be edentulous; this is impor­tant for business, domestic and social purposes
n
aesthetics are maintained by placing the artificial teeth in a position similar to natural teeth or improved by changing the position.
n
The advantage of a more seamless adaptation to den­tures is aided by:
n
maintenance of tooth position
n
maintenance of muscle balance
126
Master Dentistry
n
prevention of the formation of abnormal mandibular movements
n
aiding chewing and mastication.
n
Patients are likely to adapt to immediate dentures rather than waiting several months until healing and postex­traction resorption is complete. Subsequently a copy denture technique may then be utilised to reproduce successful design features and maintain some continu­ity, where desirable, to the patients’ original dentition.
There are also advantages for the dentist:
n
The use of existing dentition to reproduce occlusal rela­tionship: teeth may act as occlusal stops, which will provide the intercuspal position and the correct occlusal vertical dimension.
n
Aesthetic consideration: shape and size of the teeth are known, which will assist selection (this may prove to be a problem rather than an advantage if teeth have drifted owing to periodontal disease).
n
Haemorrhage control.

DISADVANTAGES OF IMMEDIATE DENTURES

Immediate dentures do have a number of disadvantages:
n
Good cooperation is required, with the need for several follow-up appointments. Aftercare may require many visits including relines/rebases/new dentures.
n
As alveolar bone resorption occurs rapidly, there is loss of tissue adaptation and retention.
n
Increased cost: the provision of relines and further den­ture provision makes the treatment costly.
n
A trial denture stage is not always possible: this is a big disadvantage as it is not possible to show the patient what the teeth will eventually look like.
n
Gross irregularities of teeth make processing difficult (e.g. class II division 2, bulbous tuberosities/tori).
n
Surgical challenges may present difficulties Special care for infective endocarditis/diabetes/coronary heart dis­ease/risk of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws.
Types of Immediate Denture
Immediate dentures can be flanged or socket fit.
Flanged dentures:
n
are retentive
n
are easier to reline and rebase
n
may be difficult to place where there is an undercut – use of partial flange.
Socket-fit dentures:
n
are contraindicated in mandible
n
the necks of the teeth sit into extraction sockets and are aesthetically good initially
n
are prone to loss of aesthetics as resorption progresses
n
are difficult to reline/rebase or to add flange
n
have poorer retention
n
are technically easier to provide, though unless strongly indicated are suboptimal.
Diagnosis
The decision to render a patient edentulous should not be undertaken lightly, and a clear understandable discussion about the risks and benefits of treatment and alternatives
should be entered into. A record of the patients’ decisions to accede to being rendered edentulous should be noted. The difficulties involved with immediate denture provision must be explained to patients. The patient needs:
n
clear explanation of the technique
n
visits to be planned
n
the staging of planned extractions
n
appropriate cooperation.
The health of the oral and facial tissues must be assessed:
n
Soft tissues: basic periodontal evaluation, probing depths give an indication of the initial collapse/retraction of soft tissues; pre-extraction scaling and polishing
n
Hard tissues: edentulous areas, charting of teeth, use of appropriate justified radiographic images.
Treatment Planning
For a one-tooth immediate denture when no denture is present:
1. Preliminary and/or master impressions, usually in algi­nate. Impression of opposing arch and suitable interoc­clusal record
2. Select shape and shade of tooth
3. Extraction of tooth/teeth and delivery of dentures.
For a one-tooth addition to an existing denture:
1. Impression of mouth with denture in situ. Impression of opposing arch and suitable interocclusal record
2. Addition of denture tooth/teeth as soon as possible
3. Extraction of tooth/teeth and delivery of denture.
For multiple-teeth immediate denture, one of the three
options is possible:
1. Extract all the teeth at one time and insert immediate dentures.
or:
2. Extract posterior teeth prior to making immediate den­tures to replace anterior teeth.
or:
3. Post-immediate dentures – difficulties can arise because of ongoing resorption of ridges during denture con­struction.
Clinical Stages
The clinical stages are the following:
1. Preliminary impressions in alginate with or without impression compound
2. Master impressions in alginate
3. Occlusal record rims for existing edentulous areas
4. Trial stage
5. Delivery of dentures and extraction of teeth
6. Review appointments.
Laboratory Stage
Trimming of casts occurs between try-in and before pro­cessing of dentures. The cast should ideally be prepared by the dental surgeon as they alone have seen the patient and undertaken the clinical examination. The cast is marked with a pencil to show the gingival margin, the long axis of the teeth and the length of the teeth. The teeth are removed