Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6023_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
35 Мб
Скачать
182
8 Surgical Management ofDiabetic Retinopathy
adequate staining is achieved upon injection, immediate aspiration follows. If visualization is insufcient, the endo-illuminator should be withdrawn, allowing the agent to dwell for 30–60 seconds before aspiration and washout. This approach balances minimal toxicity with enhanced visualization.
3. Hyperbaric delivery: Diluting the dye with a 5% glucose solution (which is rela-
tively hyperbaric/higher density compared to BSS) allows the agent to settle directly onto the posterior pole. This prevents unwanted diffusion throughout the vitreous cavity and focuses the staining on the target tissue.
8.6.2 Tamponades
(1) Intraoperative Tamponades
Peruorocarbon liquid (PFCL)is a vital intraoperative tool for stabilizing the pos­terior pole and protecting the macula from mechanical traction. Acting as a “third hand,” PFCL enables surgeons to resect peripheral vitreous and dissect proliferative membranes with greater safety and efciency.Despite these advantages, novice sur­geons should exercise caution when using PFCL for retinal attening. In cases involving rigid, contracted retina, PFCL can become sequestered within retinal folds or migrate into the subretinal space through occult micro-tears. Therefore, PFCL should be reserved as a last resort if air/uid exchange fails to achieve ade­quate reattachment. During administration, a gentle injection technique is essential to prevent “sh-egg” droplet formation, IOPspikes, or iatrogenic retinal damage.
Viscoelastic agents may also assist with adhesions, though their use should be limited due to uncertain safety proles and difculty in detecting residual material in the vitreous cavity.
(2) Postoperative Tamponades
For uncomplicated vitreous hemorrhage (VH) where the retina is at and laser pho­tocoagulation is secure, balanced salt solution (BSS) may be used for primary tam­ponade, or ltered air for short-term support. In cases of moderate retinal proliferation, provided the membranes are completely removedand retinal hemor­rhage is minimal, inert gas is an appropriate tamponade choice (Fig.8.16).
Silicone oil is indicated for severe PDR with high vascular activity due to its hemostatic properties and its role in preventing iris neovascularization by blocking the anterior migration of VEGF.For elderly patients, oil removal is generally rec­ommended at 3–6 months. Delayed removal often leads to advanced cataracts with harder nuclei and poor pupillary dilation, complicating future surgery for novice surgeons. In these challenging scenarios, the risk of serious complications like cor­neal endothelial decompensation is signicantly elevated.
8.6 Vital Dyes andIntraocular Tamponade Agents
183
a
b
Fig. 8.16 Management of severe PDR with TRD. (a) Preoperative fundus showing superotempo- ral TRD (red dashed line) and tight posterior hyaloid adhesion on OCT (white box). Post-membrane excision, residual retinal folds remained (red box). (b) Three weeks postoperatively, the folds resolved spontaneously, and the retina is now fully attached (red dashed line). BCVA improved from 0.02 to 0.6, with nearly normal macular anatomy
184
8 Surgical Management ofDiabetic Retinopathy
8.7 How toGet Rid ofIntraoperative Dilemmas
8.7.1 Corneal Edema
Corneal edema is common in PDR patients during surgery. If it occurs early in the procedure, it signicantly impairs intraocular visualization. The following mea­sures can be taken to reduce the incidence and severity of corneal edema:
1. Limit Preoperative chemical exposure: Control the duration of povidone-iodine
contact with the conjunctival sac (ideally1min) to reduce epithelial toxicity.
2. Maintain epithelial hydration: Intraoperatively, apply viscoelastic sodium to
shield the corneal surface, or irrigatewith BSS to ensure the epithelium remains adequately hydrated.
3. Optimize uid dynamics: Maintain a stable infusion pressure, ideally between
20–25 mmHg. Avoid premature PFCL injection or air/uid exchange, as sudden IOPuctuations can trigger corneal decompensation.
4. If necessary, scrape off the edematous corneal epithelium with a blade.
8.7.2 Lens Opacity
Beyond avoiding iatrogenic trauma, utilizing valved trocars is essential to minimize IOPuctuations. Ensure the infusion cannula is angled toward the center of the vitreous cavity. This prevents localized turbulent owfrom directly impacting the posterior lens surface. Although BSS contains glucose, a signicant gradient between the infusion uid and the patient’s elevated systemic glucose levels can trigger acute osmotic lens opacication. Therefore, preoperative blood glucose must be stabilized within a therapeutic range.Avoid premature air-uid exchange or PFCL injection, as these maneuvers can induce sudden IOP shifts that compromise corneal and lens clarity.
Furthermore, combinedcataract surgery with PPVis not recommendedin PDR cases. Combining these procedures acutely increases surgical complexity and ele­vates the risk of postoperative inammatory complications.
8.7.3 Pupillary Constriction
Due to diabetes-related reductions in iris elasticity, some PDR patients exhibit inad­equate mydriasis or progressive intraoperative miosis, which can compromise the visualization of surgical maneuvers. Fortunately, the integration of wide-angle
8.7 How toGet Rid ofIntraoperative Dilemmas
185
viewing systems has made this issue less limiting by providing a broader eld of view despite a smaller pupillary aperture.
In patients with stable systemic blood pressure, intrameal epinephrine can be administered to enhance pupillary dilation. A common clinical preparation involves diluting 0.1% epinephrine in a 10-mL BSS-lled syringe (aspirating a volume approximately equal to a small air bubble). Generally, the use of iris retractors is discouraged in PDR cases, as the fragile, inelastic iris tissue is highly susceptible to iatrogenic tears and hemorrhage.
8.7.4 Iatrogenic Retinal Tears
Iatrogenic retinal tears represent a signicant complication in PDR surgery, often arising from a combination of complex factors. Despite the implementation of vari­ous surgical techniques, the manipulation required for proliferative membrane man­agement may result in iatrogenic tears. While such incidents can occur during surgery, focus remains on prevention through rened maneuvers.
In the event that an iatrogenic retinal tear is identied, the vitreous surrounding the break should be resected thoroughly, and any adhering proliferative membranes should be removed. When managed appropriately, these tears can be utilized effec­tively during the procedure as conduits for draining subretinal uid during air/uid exchange. Following successful reattachment of the retina, laser photocoagulation is employed to seal the tear. With timely and precise intervention, these events typi­cally do not lead to severe long-term complications.
8.7.5 Intraoperative Bleeding
Intraoperative bleeding in PDR surgery can originate from multiple sources, includ­ing neovascularization, the optic disc, retinal vasculature, the iris, scleral ports, or the choroid. As in conventional vitrectomy, the most critical preventive strategy is the judicious adjustment and maintenance of infusion pressure.
Hemorrhage is most frequently encountered during the resection or delamination of proliferative membranes with rm vascular adhesions (Fig.8.17). Once active bleeding is identied, immediate intervention is mandatory. Due to the increased blood viscosity characteristic of PDR patients, large-volume hemorrhage becomes difcult to aspirate and can severely obscure the surgical eld, hindering further maneuvers. The following techniques should be employed to achieve effective hemostasis:
186
8 Surgical Management ofDiabetic Retinopathy
ab
Fig. 8.17 Retinal bleeding during proliferative membrane resection. (a) Severe bleeding occurs when resecting a proliferative membrane tightly adherent to the retina (blue arrow) with a vitrec­tome. (b) After aspirating the blood clot with a vitrectome, an active bleeding site is identied (green arrow)
(1) Temporarily Increasing Infusion Pressure
The duration must be strictly controlled (3min) to avoid severely impairing retinal perfusion. After bleeding is controlled, the infusion pressure can be gradually reduced to the normal range in a stepwise manner.
(2) Intraocular Instrument Compression Hemostasis
Use the tip of a ute needle or vitrectomy cutter to gently press the bleeding site for at least 1min. Avoid ineffective compression due to hand tremors.
(3) Timely Air/Fluid Exchange
Bleeding dissolves quickly in BSS, impairing surgical eld visibility. Air/uid exchange can be performed to allow hemostatic manipulation under gas tamponade.
(4) Electrocoagulation
Precision is essential: the intensity should be controlled within a reasonable range to avoid iatrogenic tears.
(5) Laser Photocoagulation
This is a safe and effective method that beginners should master. The tip of the laser ber does not need to contact the bleeding site; the laser beam can accurately target the bleeding point, using thermal effects to induce coagulation and hemostasis.
(6) “Luring the Snake Out of Its Hole”
To thoroughly address all bleeding sites intraoperatively, after initial hemostasis, temporarily reduce the infusion pressure to 15–20mmHg and wait briey. Carefully
8.8 Postoperative Complications andtheManagement
observe for active bleeding; if detected, use laser photocoagulation for precise sealing.
187
8.8 Postoperative Complications andtheManagement
Beyond the complications inherent to vitrectomy and intraocular tamponades, PDR patients are predisposed to specic postoperative challenges.
8.8.1 Elevated Intraocular Pressure
Postoperative ocular hypertension can manifest in early or late stages. Management should be guided by the severity of the IOP elevation and anterior segment ndings,
third of patients experience transient IOP elevation. Notably, corneal edema may result in overestimated readings via non-contact tonometry (NCT); therefore, clini­cal symptoms such as headache and ocular pain must be assessed.Observation is typically sufcient for IOP 30 mmHg, 1–2 types of topical hypotensive agents should be initiated, with systemic medications added if necessary.If the elevation is secondary to pupillary block, it often progresses rapidly. Management includes immediate intensive anti-inammatory and mydriatic therapy, strict adherence to a prone position, and prompt surgical intervention if conservative measures fail.
Delayed IOP elevation is frequently caused by silicone oil emulsication. In rare instances, it may be secondary to neovascular glaucoma (NVG) or progressive reti­nal proliferation. Treatment must be tailored to the underlying etiology.
Middle-to-late postoperative IOP elevation is often caused by silicone oil emul­sication; in rare cases, it is secondary to iris neovascularization or worsening reti­nal proliferation. Management should be tailored to the specic cause.
specically anterior chamber depth and inammatory status.Approximately one-
8.8.2 Uveal Reaction andInflammation
Signicant postoperative uveal reactions are common in PDR patients, driven by a systemic pro-inammatory state and extensive intraoperative manipulation. Manifestations include pupillary exudative membranes, keratic precipitates (KPs), aqueous are, and cells. Compared to standard vitrectomy, PDR cases require inten­sied postoperative anti-inammatory regimens. If indicated, systemic corticoste­roids may be administered under rigorous blood glucose monitoring. Cycloplegic therapy is essential: atropine ointment is preferred during the initial postoperative week, followed by a transition to tropicamide eye drops.
188
8 Surgical Management ofDiabetic Retinopathy
8.8.3 Lens Opacity
onset cataracts are common and require experienced surgeons, with pre-operative stabilization of retinal proliferation and mandatory post-operative monitoring for macular edema and neovascularization.
8.8.4 Iris Neovascularization andSecondary Glaucoma
Neovascularization of the iris (NVI) typically manifests several weeks postopera-
posterior segment procedures (e.g., phaco-vitrectomy) (Fig.8.18).To mitigate the risk of NVI, surgeons should prioritize the following strategies: (1)Ensure the judi­cious use of perioperative anti-VEGF agents and the administration of comprehen­sive, conuent PRP; (2) Minimize intraoperative manipulation of the anterior segment to reduce the release of pro-angiogenic inammatory mediators; (3)Verify that the PRP is sufciently extensive to eliminate retinal ischemia, which is the primary driver of VEGF production.If the elevated IOPremains refractory despite aggressive pharmacological intervention, a timely referral to a glaucoma specialist is mandatory for the management of potential neovascular glaucoma (NVG).
If no iatrogenic damage occurs, post-inammatory lens opacity often resolves.Late-
tively. Key risk factors include aphakia, pseudophakia, and combined anterior-
8.8.5 Anterior Hyaloidal Fibrovascular Proliferation
Anterior hyaloidal brovascular proliferation (AHFP)is a distinct manifestation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) following PDR surgery, predominantly affect­ing young male patients with Type 1 diabetes. It is characterized by brovascular
Fig. 8.18 Postoperative iris neovascularization. Neovascularization of the irisobserved one month
following phaco-
vitrectomyfor PDR
8.8 Postoperative Complications andtheManagement
189
membranes that originate from the peripheral retina and extend anteriorly toward the ciliary epithelium, the posterior lens capsule, and the posterior iris surface. Clinically, patients present with rapid, severe vision loss, accompanied by signi­cant anterior segment inammation and hyphema. Due to its aggressive nature, AHFP is challenging to treat and carries a poor visual prognosis.
Prevention during the primary surgery is critical. Two key strategies are essential to mitigate this risk: (1)Performing extensive, conuent PRP that reaches the pos­terior edge of the ora serrata; (2)Executing a thorough peripheral vitreous shaving under scleral indentation to remove the scaffold for future proliferation.
8.8.6 Intraocular Fibrin Syndrome
This complication is rare but notoriously difcult to manage, often carrying a poor visual prognosis. It is characterized by extensive intraocular brin exudation and deposition, which can lead to pupillary membrane occlusion, tractional retinal detachment, and secondary neovascularization (Fig.8.19).Key risk factors include: (1) Combined anterior-posterior segment surgery (e.g., phaco-vitrectomy); (2)Excessive or high-intensity laser photocoagulation, which triggers a massive inammatory response.
8.8.7 Vitreous Hemorrhage
Early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage may arise from minor leakage from retinal vessels, residual brovascular membranes left after surgery, or postoperative disper­sion of residual blood from the peripheral vitreous into the vitreous cavity. Close observation, mainly using B-scan ultrasonography, is recommended, and surgical intervention is generally unnecessary in the short term. Some patients may benet from repeat intravitreal anti-VEGF injection. If the hemorrhage does not clear after 1–2 months of observation, or if retinal detachment or elevated IOP develops, sec­ond surgerymay be performed, with caution to avoid complications associated with a vitrectomizedeye. The bleeding source should be treated concurrently, and sili­cone oil tamponade should be considered when indicated.
Mid-to-late postoperative vitreous hemorrhage may result from recurrent retinal brovascular proliferation. Neovascularization of the iris and angle may also lead to vitreous hemorrhage. Management should be individualized according to the under­lying cause.
190
cd
8 Surgical Management ofDiabetic Retinopathy
a b
Fig. 8.19 Postoperative brinoid syndrome following phaco-vitrectomy for PDR. (a) Baseline: No retinal detachment on B-scan. (b) Combined phaco-vitrectomy and IOL implantation was per­formed due to dense cataract obscuring the fundus. (c) The retina remained at intraoperatively. (d) Day 3 postoperative: Signicant vision loss. B-scan shows a classic funnel-shaped RD second­ary to severe brinoid exudation

8.9 Summary

191
8.9 Summary
“Only a strategic protracted war is the sole path to nal victory.” The surgical man­agement of advanced PDR is inherently complex, characterized by extended thera­peutic timelines and signicant variability in procedural difculty. Achieving successful outcomes necessitates comprehensive perioperative care and a high level of technical prociency to navigate frequent and multifaceted intraoperative and postoperative complications. Novice surgeons should initially operate under the close supervision of senior men­tors. It is essential to strictly adhere to surgical indications, prioritize clinical obser­vation, and engage in continuous self-reection and systematic case reviews. Independent management of severe PDR cases should only be undertaken after accumulating substantial surgical experience and demonstrating consistent clinical judgment.