Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6023_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
35 Мб
Скачать
6.4 Basic Steps andPrecautions ofScleral Buckling
ab
cd
121
Fig. 6.22 Changes in the shape ofocular wallby silicone explants. (a) The ocular wall is nearly circular when the silicone explant is not tightened. (b) After tightening the encircling band, the anteroposterior diameter of the vitreous cavity increases, and the anterior chamber becomes slightly shallower. (c) When suturing the silicone explant, a small suture span produces a ridgewith a low height and gentle slope. (d) A larger suture span creates a ridgewith greater height and a steeper slope
8. Close the conjunctival incision:Align the conjunctival incision edges and close with interrupted or continuous 8–0 absorbable sutures. If tension is high, place a xation suture at the limbus to prevent slipping. Wounds heal quickly, typically within 2 weeks, but avoid rough alignment to prevent excessive postoperative edema and scarring. Conjunctival sutures may be removed promptly to reduce ocular foreign body sensation.
122
6 Surgical Intervention ofRhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Part 1 (Scleral…
6.5 Different Operations inScleral Buckling
As noted above, there are considerable variations in the specic techniques of scleral buckling, and particularly in recent years, several new surgical approaches have emerged. We will discuss these objectively to broaden our knowledge and facilitate the more effective application of scleral buckling in addressing practical clinical challenges.
6.5.1 Break Localization andSealing Under Indirect
Ophthalmoscope andMicroscopes
1. Indirect ophthalmoscope: It provides a three-dimensional, clear fundus image, facilitating dynamic observation of the cryotherapy effect. It offers advantagein locating small peripheral breaks undermoderatescleral indentation.
However, the biggest disadvantage of the indirect ophthalmoscope is its steep learning curve and reverse imaging. It is difficult for beginners to master it proficiently in a short time. Many beginners often lose confidence after failing to locate breaks with the indirect ophthalmoscope and then turn to learning break localization under microscope. This choice is reasonable, but it does not diminish the importance and necessity of the use ofindirect ophthalmoscope—especially when diagnosing and treating pediatric vitreoretinaldisorders.
2. Microscope: Moststeps ofare performed undermicroscope. The surgeon does not need to use an indirect ophthalmoscope for break localization or cryo­therapy, ensuring theprocedural consistency. This technique is particularly useful in medical institutions that lack access to an indirect ophthalmoscope.
Because the procedure is performed under the microscope, the highest point of the peripheral retina must be depressed to bring it close to the visual axis. This is difcult to achieve without scleral drainage. Therefore, this tech­nique places high demands on drainage. However, beginners should avoid pursuing maximal efcacy of subretinal drainage at the expense of safety.Additionally, for some small breaks, if the neurosensory retina is not frozen to bewhite enough, the break may be difcult to visualize clearly. As a result, the total cryoenergy delivered during break localizationand cryo­therapymay be excessive.
Mastering the indirect ophthalmoscope requires overcoming a steep learning curve. However, if we approach it as an essential career skill and actively learn
6.5 Dierent Operations inScleral Buckling
123
it—just as no novice ophthalmologist would give up learning slit-lamp biomi­croscopy despite similar difculty—the lasting and profound sense of fulll­ment it brings will be well worth the effort. At the same time, microscopic scleral buckling also offers distinct advantages. Beginners should remain objective and open-minded, trying different techniques in clinical practice to nd the approach that best suits you.
6.5.2 Subretinal Fluid Drainage
From the surgeon’s perspective, the decision to perform subretinal uid drainage depends on two major factors: (1) The specic surgical philosophy the surgeon follows; and (2) The clinical balance between its potential advantages and inher­ent risks. All other secondary considerations revolve around these two fundamen­tal pillars. By carefully examining these factors from both the patient’s clinical status and the surgeon’s technical perspective, a well-informed nal decision can be reached.
(1) Concepts
The Custodis–Lincoff school has demonstrated through long-term practice that scleral buckling can achieve a high success rate without subretinal uid drainage— even when the retinal break remains unclosed at the end of the procedure. As explained earlier by Bernoulli’s equation, the buckling effect around the break pro­motes retinal reattachment. If the buckle is placed appropriately, subretinal uid will be gradually absorbed over one or several days after surgery (Fig.6.23).
Based on the principle of maximizing benets while minimizing risks—although the probability of choroidal hemorrhage caused by subretinal uid drainage is low (approximately 10%)—this school emphasizes that it should be avoided whenever possible.
The Schepens school believes that subretinal uid drainage enables more accu­rate sealing of the retinal break during surgery, results in more denitive scar forma­tion, and does not require an excessively high buckle to seal the break. Especially in patients with relatively viscous subretinal uid, drainage promotes complete retinal reattachment. Regarding potential complications, this school believes that the ben­ets signicantly outweigh the risks. As long as proper surgical techniques are fol­lowed, the probability of complications such as choroidal hemorrhage remains low—there is no need to “abandon eating for fear of choking.”
124
6 Surgical Intervention ofRhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Part 1 (Scleral…
a
b
c
Fig. 6.23 Preoperative and postoperative fundus images of scleral buckling without subretinal uiddrainage. (a) Preoperative oval hole and multiple degenerative lesions in the superotemporal area; corrected visual acuity was 0.1. The patient was monocular, so it was ultimately decided not to perform subretinal uid drainage. (b) Twelve hours after scleral buckling, subretinal uid was partially absorbed; the silicone buckle was faintly visible, and the break was located above the buckle. (c) Half a month after surgery, the retina was completely attached, the break was fully apposed to the silicone buckle, and corrected visual acuity was 0.8
(2) Advantages and Disadvantages
1. Advantages of subretinal uid drainage: (1) Directly reduces the volume of
subretinal uid, thereby enhancing its absorption; (2) Brings the retinal break into closer proximity with the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), thereby facilitating the effective application of cryotherapy; and (3) Lowers intraocular pressure, which can aid in the precise localization and effective sealing of small peripheral retinal breaks.
2. Disadvantages of subretinal uid drainage: (1) Signicant increase in the risk
of choroidal hemorrhage, where small hemorrhages outside the macula gener­ally resolve spontaneously, but severe hemorrhage can result in devastating visual loss and make secondary surgery extremely challenging (Fig.6.24); (2) High risk associated with the drainage site selection, as drainage from areas with limited subretinal uid or proximity to high-risk structures like vortex
ab
6.5 Dierent Operations inScleral Buckling
125
veins remains hazardous regardless of surgical skill; (3) High incidence of complications secondary to a sudden drop in intraocular pressure, including globe collapse and choroidal detachment; (4) Potential for retinal perforation leading to iatrogenic breaks, though the incidence remains low; and (5) Risk of retinal incarceration or vitreous prolapse, which occurs with very low frequency.
(3) Selection of DrainingLocation
If the surgeon decides to perform subretinal uid drainage, a 2-mL syringe nee­dle may be used to puncture the sclera, or a sharp blade may be used for oblique puncture. When subretinal uid is observed to ow out, a cotton swab or forceps can be used to gently depress the ocular wall to facilitate further uid egress. If no uid ows out after puncture, do not manipulate the incision signicantly to avoid choroidal hemorrhage. Indirect ophthalmoscopy can be used to reassess the location of subretinal uid elevation, and an alternative safe drainage site may be selected for puncture.
c
Fig. 6.24 Postoperative fundus images of choroidal hemorrhage during scleral buckling. (a) Intraoperative fundus examination revealed subretinal hemorrhage. The patient was immediately instructed to maintain a left lateral decubitus position after surgery. On the rst postoperative day, fundus examination showed that the retina was essentially attached, the break was well sealed, and the hemorrhage was predominantly in the temporal area. As the hemorrhage did not signicantly involve the macula, the patient’s vision recovered well (corrected visual acuity 0.5), although the patient complained of a xed black scotoma. (b) Fundus reexamination six months after surgery showed complete retinal attachment and complete resolution of the subretinal hemorrhage. Because a 6/0 absorbable suture was used to secure the silicone explant, the silicone buckle had completely disappeared after the suture degraded (corrected visual acuity 1.0). (c) OCT at six months postoperatively revealed an intact and continuous ellipsoid zone in the macular area, but the ellipsoid zone was absent in the slightly temporal region (red arrow), which was attributed to a toxic reaction caused by the subretinal hemorrhage
126
ab
6 Surgical Intervention ofRhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Part 1 (Scleral…
Regardless of the drainage method used, the following principles should be fol­lowed to select the optimal drainage site: (1) The drainage point must be located within the area of greatest subretinal uid detachment; (2) Avoid the 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock positions to protect the long posterior ciliary arteries and long ciliary nerves; (3) Avoid the areas surrounding the vortex veins to minimize hemorrhagic risk; (4) The zones one clock hour above and below the medial and lateral rectus muscles are considered the safest for drainage (Fig.6.25); (5) Maintain an appropri­ate distance from the limbus, as being too close results in low drainage efciency while being too far increases the risk of choroidal hemorrhage—a distance of 10–12mm from the limbus is generally preferable; and (6) Prioritize safety above all, and do not persist with the attempt if signicant technical difculties arise.
6.5.3 Scleral Encircling
For patients with extensive retinal degeneration—particularly adolescents with underlying conditions such as familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) or Stickler syndrome—the risk of peripheral vitreous traction and contraction is rela­tively high. Scleral encircling may be considered in such cases (Fig. 6.26). Alternatively, peripheral retinal laser photocoagulation can be performed preopera­tively or postoperatively to seal the degenerative areas and prevent the formation of new breaks.
The following points should be noted during xation of the encircling band: (1) Ensure that the encircling band passes completely under the rectus muscles;
Fig. 6.25 Subretinal uid drainage. (a) Puncture slightly above the lateral rectus muscle using oblique needle insertion; the chord length from the puncture site to the limbus is approximately 12mm (green line). (b) Successful drainage of subretinal uid: gently depress the scleral wound with the needle to facilitate further uid egress; no signicant bleeding is observed during the procedure
6.5 Dierent Operations inScleral Buckling
Fig. 6.26 Fundus image after scleral buckling. The patient underwent encircling with scleralbuck­ling for retinal detachment in the right eye over 30 years ago (at age 20). The surgical ridge is well in position. No recurrent retinal detachment was observed during long-term follow-up. Subsequently, his daughter developed the same type of retinal detachment, and genetic testing conrmed that both were diagnosed with Stickler syndrome(COL2A1 gene mutation)
127
carefully verify that it does not compress any portion of the muscles; (2)Adjust the anteroposterior suture distance according to the position of the silicone explant to ensure that the encircling buckle remains parallel to the limbus; (3) Reasonably adjust the tightness of the encircling band based on the band’s position and the axial length of the surgical eye. A mild scleral indentation is preferred; excessive tighten­ing may cause axial elongation, adversely affecting anterior segment perfusion and potentially progressing myopia; (4) If intraocular pressure becomes excessively elevated, perform anterior chamber paracentesis promptly to maintain normal intra­ocular pressure.
6.5.4 Modified Methods inScleral Buckling
In recent years, several modied scleral buckling techniques have emerged, includ­ing the following: (1)Using a 25G endoilluminator to visualize the break position, assess the degree of cryopexy, and verify the correct placement of the silicone buckle from an internal approach; (2)Using a 25G light ber combined with an external scleral cryoprobe to localize and seal the break; (3) Internal buckling: incis­ing the sclera beneath the break and injecting viscoelastic material into the sub­scleral space to create a temporary buckling ridge under the break (this method typically requires internal illumination). These modied techniques have enriched the scope of scleral buckling. However, because they involve entry into the vitreous
128
cavity, attention must be paid to incision maintenance during surgery to prevent complications such as wound leakage and vitreous incarceration.
6 Surgical Intervention ofRhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Part 1 (Scleral…
6.5.5 Modified Suturing Technique toProduce Temporary
Scleral Buckling Effect forNoncomplex Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
The modied buckling technique was proposed by the author (Zhang) in 2024. It uses both nonabsorbable and absorbable sutures to create a temporary scleral buckling effect for noncomplex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This tech­nique provides an adequate buckling effect while inducing minimal permanent refractive changes. Figure6.27 shows the main steps of this technique.
This technique offers a distinct advantage: it does not cause signicant changes in axial length or refractive power. After the absorbable suture has been absorbed, the shape of the eyeball remains essentially unchanged (Fig.6.28), and the risk of inducing or exacerbating anisometropia is relatively low. However, its long-term efcacy, safety, and optimal indications require further validation.
ef
6.5 Dierent Operations inScleral Buckling
129
ab c
d
Fig. 6.27 Key steps of the technique using a combination of nonabsorbable and absorbable sutures to produce a temporary buckling effect. (a) The segmental silicone tire is xed to the sclera with a 5-0 nonabsorbable suture (green arrow). (b) After the 5-0 nonabsorbable suture is tied (green arrow), 6-0 absorbable sutures are added to tighten the silicone tire and create a scleral ridge (white arrow). (c) One end of the silicone tire is xed to the sclera with a 5-0 nonabsorbable suture (green arrow). (d) The other end of the silicone tire is xed to the sclera with a 5-0 nonabsorbable suture (green arrow). (e) A silicone sleeve (green arrow) is used to hold the two ends of the encir­cling band, which are then tightened with a 6-0 absorbable suture. (f) After a 5-0 nonabsorbable suture is tied to secure the band in place (green arrow), the silicone sleeve is removed. The 6-0 absorbable suture then becomes the only element tightening the two ends of the band
130
ab
cd
6 Surgical Intervention ofRhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Part 1 (Scleral…
Fig. 6.28 Typical case who underwent the suturing technique with both segmental silicone tire and encircling band. (a) Before surgery, a retinal tear (white arrow) and supercial macula-off reti­nal detachment were observed, with an axial length 26.97 mm. (b) One day after the surgery, reti­nal reattached, with an obvious scleral ridge. (c) One month after surgery, the ridge was still present and in situ.(d) Three months after surgery, the retina remains attached, the scleral ridge is basically resolved, axial length 26.99mm, corrected visual acuity 1.0
6.6 Postoperative Complications andManagement
ofScleral Buckling
Aside from choroidal hemorrhage, scleral buckling is generally safe when proper surgical techniques are followed; however, several postoperative issues still warrant close attention.
6.6.1 Persistent Subretinal Fluid
Subretinal uid may persist for an extended period in certain patients, particularly in cases involving: (1) Adolescents; (2) Chronic retinal detachment; and (3) Situations where no drainage or insufcient drainage of subretinal uid was