Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_861_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Indications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Cost
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
Atourinstitution,wehaveadoptedanenhancedrecoveryprotocol(ERP)
pathway.SeveralstudieshavenowshownthatERPhasprovenbenefitto
thepatient,lengthofhospitalstay,anddecreasedcostwithoutadded
morbidityorhospitalreadmissionrates.Patientsaregivenintravenous
ketorolacandoraloxycodoneforpaincontrolonthedayofsurgery,kept
onmaintenancefluids(40ml/hour),andstartedonanadliboraldiet.
Patientsareencouragedtoambulateifthecasewasperformedinthe
morning.Onpostoperativeday1,oraloxycodoneandanadliboraldietis
continued,Foleycathetersandmaintenancefluidsarediscontinued,
patientsareencouragedtoambulateatleastsixtimeswiththeassistance
ofthenursingstaff,andstomatherapistsvisitallpatientswithstomas.
Onpostoperativeday2,theaforementionedarecontinued,surgicalsite
dressingsareremoved,andpatientsbeginshoweringwithHibiclens
solution.Ifpatientshaveurinaryretention,theyaretaughttoselfcatheterizeinanticipationofdischarge.

COMPLICATIONS
ThemostdreadedcomplicationfollowingaLARisananastomoticleak.
Othershort-termcomplicationsincludeasurgicalsitesuperficial
infection,deepspaceinfection,postoperativeileus,postoperative
obstruction,anddehydrationfromahighoutputstoma.Ananastomotic
leakfollowingLARhasareportedincidencevaryingfrom0%to36%with
ahighassociatedmortalityreportedbetween6%and22%.Patientsmore
likelytoexperienceananastomoticleakaremale,arediabetic,andhave
undergoneradiationtherapy.Patientswhoexperiencealeakaremore
likelytoendupwithapermanentstoma.Owingtothemorbidityand
mortalityassociatedwithanastomoticleak,mostsurgeonschooseto
divertalowrectalanastomosiswithaloopileostomy.Arecently
publishedmeta-analysisof4randomizedclinicaltrialsand21
nonrandomizedtrialsconfirmedthatadivertingostomydecreasedthe
clinicalanastomoticleakandreoperationrate.
Long-termcomplicationsfollowingLARincludeanastomoticstricture,
smallbowelobstructionfromadhesions,localrecurrenceofrectalcancer,
andneedforapermanentstomabecauseofanastomoticstricture,fecal
incontinence,symptomaticradiationproctitis,orLARsyndrome.Inthe
settingofananastomoticstricture,directdigitaldilatationorHegar
dilators(CooperSurgical,Inc.,Trumbull,CT)maybeusedtodilatean
anastomosisinthedistalrectum.Ifunabletobeperformed,endoscopic
balloondilatationisthemosteffectivemethodfortreatingthestricture
furtherproximalintherectum.Itisimportanttorememberthata
recurrentmalignancyshouldbeexcludedbeforetreatment.

RESULTS
SincethefirstreportoflaparoscopiccolectomybyJacobsin1991,
laparoscopicsurgeryhasbecomeincreasinglyutilizedinthetreatmentof
colonandrectalcancer.Comparedwithopensurgery,alaparoscopic
approachreducespostoperativepain,wound-relatedcomplications,and
lengthofhospitalstay.However,masteringstraightlaparoscopyfor
rectalcancercanbechallenginggiventhepooranglesthatlimit
retractionwithintheconfinesofthebonypelvis.
p.160
p.161
OwingtotheoncologicimportanceofperformingacompleteTMEand
theuncertaintyofsurvivaloutcomeswithalaparoscopicTME,ahybrid
approachisanidealcombinationtominimizeincisionlengthwhile
maintaininganopenproctectomy.Thisapproachissimilartohandassistedlaparoscopictechniquesgiventhesmallincisionmadeforthe
openproctectomy.Whenstudyinghand-assistedlaparoscopycompared
tostraightlaparoscopy,straightlaparoscopyappearstohaveashorter
recoverytime.However,theaforementionedbenefitswithlaparoscopy
werestillseenwiththehand-assistedtechnique.

CONCLUSIONS
AhybridapproachtoaLARallowsforanopenTMEwhileemploying
laparoscopicmobilizationtominimizeincisionlengthanditsassociated
complications.Inthecurrentenvironment,ahybridapproachallowing
foranopenTMEisanoptimaltechnique.

RECOMMENDEDREFERENCESAND
READINGS
CaulfieldH,HymanNH.Anastomoticleakafterlowanteriorresection:aspectrumofclinical
entities.JAMASurg2013;148(2):177–82.
FleshmanJ,BrandaM,SargentDJ,etal.Effectoflaparoscopic-assistedresectionvsopen
resectionofstageIIorIIIrectalcanceronpathologicoutcomes:theACOSOGZ6051
randomizedclinicaltrial.JAMA2015;314(13):1346–55.
FleshmanJ,SargentDJ,GreenE,etal;ClinicalOutcomesofSurgicalTherapyStudyGroup.
Laparoscopiccolectomyforcancerisnotinferiortoopensurgerybasedon5-yeardatafromthe
coststudygrouptrial.AnnSurg2007;246(4):655–62;discussion662–4.
GustafssonUO,TiefenthalM,ThorellA,LjungqvistO,NygrensJ.Laparoscopic-assistedandopen
highanteriorresectionwithinanERASprotocol.WorldJSurg2012;36(5):1154–61.
MarcelloPW,FleshmanJW,MilsomJW,etal.Hand-assistedlaparoscopicvs.laparoscopic
colorectalsurgery:amulticenter,prospective,randomizedtrial.DisColonRectum
2008;51(6):818–26;discussion826–8.
StevensonAR,SolomonMJ,LumleyJW,etal;ALaCaRTInvestigators.Effectoflaparoscopic-
assistedresectionvsopenresectiononpathologicaloutcomesinrectalcancer:the
ALaCaRTrandomizedclinicaltrial.JAMA2015;314(13):1356–63.
VithianathanS,CooperZ,BettenK,etal.Hybridlaparoscopicflexuretakedownandopen
procedureforrectalresectionisassociatedwithsignificantlyshorterlengthofstaythan
equivalentopenresection.DisColonRectum2001;44(7):927–35.

Chapter20
IntersphinctericRestorative
ProctocolectomyforMalignant
Disease
RonG.Landmann
INTRODUCTION
Whileaddressingtheissueofrectalcancertreatment,fourmajor
objectivesareuniformlypursued:(1)cure—includingprimarylocal
resectionwithnegativemarginsandsubsequentpreventionof
locoregional(LR)anddistantrecurrence;(2)decreasedmorbidityand
mortality;(3)preservationofsexualandurinaryfunctions—as
manifestedbyerectiledysfunction,retrogradeejaculation,vaginal
dryness,dyspareunia,anddifficultyvoiding;and(4)maintenanceof
intestinalcontinuity/avoidanceofapermanentstoma.Currently,despite
theadvancesinchemotherapeutics,biologics,andradiationtherapy,
surgeryistheprimarymodalitytoachievethesegoals.
Mostsurgeonswithexperienceinoperatingontherectumhaveat
somepointdealtwiththedifficultiesassociatedwithanarrowpelvisand
itsconfinesandanatomiccomplexitiesandintricacies.Duringthetimes
beforemodernanesthesia,whenanevengreaterimportancewasplaced
onthefurtivenessofsurgicaltechniques,mostsurgeonsavoided
venturingintothedeepanddarkdenoftherectum.Theearliest
experiencewithrectalsurgeryincludestransanalresectionoftumors.
Thisapproachcausedminimalmorbidity,butwasplaguedbyanear
universalincidenceoftumorrecurrence.Theadventofpotent,safe,and
efficaciousanesthetictechniqueshasallowedsurgeonstheopportunityto
performincreasinglymorecomplexanddelicaterectaloperations
utilizingacombinationoftransanal,abdominal,andperineal
approaches.
ErnestMilesfirstpublishedhistechniqueofanabdominoperineal

resection(APR)forrectaltumorsin1908.Thistechniquewasgradually
modifiedsothatby1924,reportsdemonstratedasignificantand
welcomedecreaseinlocalrecurrenceratesfromnearly100%totherange
of30%.Unfortunately,thisprocedurecarriedsignificantmorbidity
relatedtoapoorlyhealingperinealwound,autonomicnervedamage
resultinginimpotence,andapermanentstomaremindingpatientsof
theirdisease.Still,itbecameacceptedasthestandardofcarebecauseit
providedthebestchanceofcure.Tothisday,surgicalmanagementof
rectalcancerhasfocusedonmodificationsofMiles’techniqueinaneffort
toimproveoncologicresultsandminimizetheassociatedmorbidities.
TheAPRwasalsobeingutilizedforthemanagementofperianal
Crohn’sdiseaseaswellasulcerativecolitisandotherseptic
complications.Thehealingoftheseperinealwoundswasanevengreater
challengethanthosecreatedbysurgeryformalignancy.Theperineal
woundsinthesepatientswereinitiallymanagedbylooseapproximation
oftheskinedgesandsumpdrainage.In1970,reportswerepublished
aboutsuccessfuloutcomesafterprimarysutureoftheperinealwound
withclosedsuctiondrainage.Oatesdescribed41of53patientswith
successfulwoundhealing.AmodificationoftheAPR,intersphincteric
proctectomy,wasfirstdescribedforbenigndiseasesbyLyttlein1977.
Thethoughtwasthatsparingthestriatedexternalsphincterandpelvic
musculaturewouldcreateasmallerdeadspaceandprovideanotherlayer
ofstrongandhealthytissuetoaidinwoundclosure.Thisexpectationwas
borneoutinstudiesthatdemonstratedsignificantimprovementsin
woundhealingoverthetimeperiodof1year.Infact,studiesshowedthat
whensepsiswasinitiallycontrolledviadrainageordiversion,1yearafter
intersphinctericproctectomy,100%ofwoundsinpatientswhodidnot
receivepreoperativesteroidswereobservedtohavehealed.
In1972,LeeandDowlingreportedonatechniquethattheybelieved
woulddecreasethemorbidityassociatedwithimpotenceafteranAPR
andnameditaPerimuscularDissectionoftheRectum.Thethoughtwas
thatthelateraldissectionintothepelvisandsuperiorlyintotheregionof
theprostateresultedinnervedamagethatledtoimpotence.Avoidanceof
dissectionintheseareaswouldthusresultindecreasedmorbidity.
Subsequentstudiesevaluatingthistechniquerevealedadramatic
decreaseintheincidenceofpostoperativeimpotence.
p.163
p.164
LRrecurrencerateswerestillunacceptablyhighanditwasnotuntil
1979whenHealdadvocatedforastrictdissectiontechniquethattheLR
recurrenceratesstartedfalling,precipitously.Histechniquewasbased
onaprogressiveresearchprovidingabetterunderstandingofthe

embryologyoftherectumandperineumcombinedwiththeimproved
understandingoftheanatomicpathwaysofthenervefibersinvolvedin
erectionandejaculation.Histechniquewasoptimizedtoreducetherisk
ofdamagetothecavernosalfibersanteriortothedistalrectumalongthe
periprostaticplexusanteriortoDenonvilliers’fascia,keepthedissection
awayfromthepelvicsidewallsandthesympatheticfibers,andby
incorporatingthemesorectumandassociatedlymphnodesintothe
surgicalpathologyspecimen.Henamedhistechniquethetotal
mesorectalexcision(TME)andsubsequentlypublishedhisfindingsin
1982.Inthatpaper,hedescribedtheprecisesharpdissectionofthe
avascularplanebetweenthepresacralfasciaandthefasciapropria(“the
holyplane”)toachievearesectionspecimenwithan“intactmesorectal
envelope.”Thegoalofachievinganegativecircumferentialresection
margin(CRM)andconsequentlyreducedrecurrencewerethusfirst
proposed.
Themorbidityassociatedwithapermanentstomaafterrectalresection
hasdecreasedsignificantlymainlyduetothedecreaseinthepercentage
ofrectalresectionrequiringanAPR.Aidedbytheadvancementinthe
laparoscopictechniqueandthestaplertechnology,theAPRhasbeen
replacedwithrestorativesurgicalproceduressuchasultra-lowanterior
resection(uLAR)withvariousreconstructivemodalities.Furthermore,
advancesinadjuvantandneoadjuvanttherapieshaveallowedfor
oncologicallyacceptableresultswithsphinctersparingresectionevenin
tumorsthatinvolvetheinternalsphincter.
Thedistalresectionmargin(DRM)hasbeenapointofcontentionand
debateamongcolonandrectalsurgeonsandsurgicaloncologists.Many
beganquestioningthepreviousrecommendationsandguidelines
requiringa5cmDRM.TheNationalSurgicalBreastandBowelProject
foundnosignificantdifferencesinsurvivalorrecurrencewhen
comparingDRMsoflessthan2cm,2–3cm,andhigherthan3cm.
MoorepublishedaseriesfromMemorialSloanKetteringCancerCenter
demonstratingthatintramuraltumorextensionbeyondthegross
mucosaledgewasuncommonandusuallylessthan1cmafterthe
preoperativecombined-modalitytherapy.Later,thesamegroupdeemed
thata1cmmarginwasacceptableinpatientsinwhomsphincter
preservationwasrequired.However,theauthorstillrecommends
obtainingafrozensectionpathologicalreviewpriortoproceedingwith
reconstruction.NewerargumentsbasedontheNorwegianColorectal
CancerGrouphavenowrecommendedthatevenmoreimportantthana
prognosticfactortowarddecreasedLRrecurrence,distantmetastasis,
andoverallsurvivalisanegativecircumferentialmarginofgreaterthan2
mm.However,thesedataweremorestronglyprognosticinhigherlesions
>6cmabovetheanalverge.
Currentstandardpractice,basedonpreoperativestaging,eitherwith

endorectalultrasonographyormagneticresonanceimaging(MRI),
recommendslowanteriorresection(LAR)orAPRformostadvanced
(i.e.,T3orN+)distallesions,within0–5cmabovethedentateline.All
theadvancesinrectalsurgerydescribedhavebeenintegraltotheadvent
ofintersphinctericrestorativeproctocolectomy(IRP),whilecontinuingto
meettheaboveprimaryobjectives.Inthisprocedure,theinternalanal
sphincter—acontinuationoftherectalwall—iscompletelyorpartially
excisedtoobtainthenecessaryfull-thicknessDRM.Subsequentcoloanal
anastomosistotheremainingsphinctercomplextherebyrestores
intestinalcontinuity,withagoalofimprovedqualityoflifewhile
preservingoncologicandfunctionaloutcomes.Withtheserefinements
andimprovementsinbothneoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapyand
surgicaltechniques,patientsnowhaveanotheroptionavailablefor
sphincterpreservation.

CONSIDERATIONSDURING
INTERSPHINCTERICPROCTECTOMY
INDICATIONSFORINTERSPHINCTERIC
RESECTION
PatientSelectionandPreoperativeEvaluation
Duetotheinherentmorbidityassociatedwithapermanentstoma,a
restorativeproctocolectomymaybeofferedtoallpatientswithtumors
thatareamenabletotheprocedure.Patientsgenerallytobeconsidered
forintersphinctericresections(ISRs)arethosepatientswithStagesI–III
distalrectaltumors(pretreatmentT1–T3,N0–1)within4cmoftheanal
vergethatdonothaveevidenceofexternalsphincterinvolvement.The
decisiontoperformarestorativeprocedureshouldbemadein
conjunctionwiththepatientafterdiscussingthelikelypostoperative
oncologicandperhapsmoreimportantly,functionaloutcomes.Whereas
involvementoftheinternalsphincterbyaninvasivediseaseshouldnot
beviewedasacontraindicationtoISR,invasionoftheexternalsphincter
orthemusculatureofthepelvicfloorwouldmakethediseaseincurable
viaIRP.Forthelatter,APRisrequiredforappropriateoncological
resectionandoutcomes.Adigitalrectalexaminationthatshowsfixation
ofthetumorshouldalsobeconsideredacontraindicationbecauseit
likelymeansthatthetumorhasbrokenthroughtheintersphincteric
planeandhasfixedtheinternalsphincter—anembryologicalderivative
andcontinuationoftherectalwall—totheexternalsphincterorthepelvic
floormusculature.SuchadiseasewouldbebettermanagedviaAPR.A
preoperativepelvicMRIorendoanalultrasoundisinstrumentalin
assessingtheextentoftumorspread.Indeed,anytumorthathas
sphincterinvolvement,priortotheuseofneoadjuvantcombinedmodalitytherapy,shouldbeexcludedfromanIRPandofferedastandard
APR,despiteimprovementafterthetherapy.Tumorsthatrespondwith
downstagingand/ordownsizingafterneoadjuvantchemoradiation
therapygenerallymakepatientcandidatesforLAR/IRP.AchestX-ray
andaCTscanoftheabdomenandpelvisshouldbeperformedtoruleout
StageIVmetastaticdisease.Inthecaseoflowrectaltumors,careshould
betakentoexaminethegroinsforevidenceofinguinal
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
