Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_861_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Dedication
- •Contributors
- •Foreword
- •Preface
- •Contents
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Surgery
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Indications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Outcomes
- •Complications
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Indications
- •Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Conclusion
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Cost
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Surgery
- •Complications
- •Results
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Conclusions
- •Introduction
- •Indications/Contraindications
- •Surgery

marginsarepositive,moretissueisexciseduntilnegativemarginsare
obtained.Incertaincases,theprocedureisconvertedtoanAPR.
Step6:TechniquesofColoanalAnastomoses
Whentheintersphinctericdissectionisperformedviatheperineal
approach,acoloanalanastomosisisthenperformed.Techniquesforthe
variousformsofrestorativeanastomosesaredescribedinthefollowing.
End-to-EndColoanalAnastomosis
Generally,casesrequiringIRPnecessitateahandsewnanastomosisas
usingstandardEEAstaplingdevicesmaynotbeappropriate.However,
stapledtechniquesforrestorativecoloanalanastomosis(CAA)afterthe
subtotalintersphinctericproctectomyhavebeendescribed.Inthis
technique,theremnantinternalsphincterisfirstpreparedfor
anastomosisbyeversionandplacementofapurse-stringsuture.AnEEA
stapleristhenutilizedtoperformtheanastomosis.Ourpreferenceisto
performahandsewnanastomosiswithasinglelayerofinterrupted
absorbablesutures.Eachsutureincorporatesfullthicknessofthewallof
thecolon,aportionoftheinternalsphincter(orexternalsphincterinthe
caseofacompleteintersphinctericproctectomy),andtheanoderm.A
straightend-to-endCAAisgenerallyperformedwhennoneofthe
followingreconstructivemodalitiesarefeasible.Carefulattentionto
maintainorientationofthebowelanditsmesenteryisassured.
TransverseColoplastyPouch
Anothermodificationofthecoloanalanastomosisthatresultsina
volumeeffectistheTransverseColoplastyPouch(TCP).Muchlikea
stricturoplastyorapyloroplasty,thecoloplastyisperformedbymakinga
longitudinalincisionontheantimesentericsideofthecolonandby
closingitinahorizontalmanner.Ourpreferenceistomakea10–12cm
longitudinalincisionstarting4cmproximalfromthemostdistalstapled
endofthecolontobeanastomosedtotheanus.Thisincisionisthen
closedinahorizontalmannerwithasinglelayerofinterrupted3-0
polydioxanonesutures.Alternatively,thisclosurecanbeperformedwith
arunninginnerlayerofabsorbablesutureandanouterinterruptedlayer
ofnonabsorbableimbricatingsutures.Thestapledendisthenintroduced
intothepelvis.Thestaplelineisremovedviaelectrocauteryanda
handsewnanastomosisisperformedontheanalcanalwithinterrupted
suturesviaatransanalapproachaspreviouslydescribedabovefor
straightEAA.
TCPorstraightend-to-endCAAisutilizedwhenthepelvisis
restrictivelynarrowed,theremaybeinsufficientintestinallength,an
excessivelybulkydescendingcolonicmesenteryexists,ordependingon

thesurgeon’spreference.
ColonicJ-PouchAnalAnastomosis(CPA)
TheColonicJ-Pouch(CJP)wasoriginallyconstructedtocreateastool
reservoirtonullifytheincreasedfrequencyofbowelmovements
followingaCAA.Theauthorpreferstoconstructa5–6cmJ-pouchas
recommendedbyaprospectivestudyevaluatingitsoptimalsize.The
distal/efferentendofthecolonisstapled.Thepouchconsistsofa10–12
cmsegmentofcolon,withthedistalhalfofthissegmentbrought
alongsidetheproximalhalfinanantiperistaltic/antimesentericmanner.
Thecolonisheldinthisconfigurationwiththeaidofoneortwostay
sutures.Acolotomyisperformedwithelectrocauteryatthesidewallof
thecolonapproximately5–6cmproximalfromthedistalefferentstapled
end.Agastrointestinalanastomosisstaplerisintroducedthroughthe
colostomyandfiredtocreateaside-to-sideanastomosisofthecolon
resultingina5-to6-cmCJP.Thepouchisthenintroducedintothepelvis
andahand-sewnanastomosisisperformedtotheanalcanalwith
interruptedsuturesviaatransanalapproachaspreviouslydescribedin
thischapter.
p.175
p.176
Althoughnotreviewed,inselectpatientsacompleteproctocolectomy
withintersphinctericdissectionmaybenecessary.Inthesecases,anileal
pouchanalanastomosismaybeutilizedastheneorectumandcompleted
inasimilarfashionastheCJP.Thetechniqueofproctocolectomyandthe
formationofanilealreservoirwithanileoanalanastomosisiswell
describedinthistextbook.However,theilealJ-pouchshouldbe
constructedutilizingatotalof40cmwitha20-cmpouchlengthrather
than5–6cm,aswiththeCJP.
Side-to-End/Baker-typeColoanalAnastomosis
Bakerdescribedthesuccessfuluseofacolorectalside-to-end
anastomosis.Morerecently,surgeonsareutilizingaBaker-typeside-toendcoloanalanastomosisfollowinganintersphinctericproctectomy.This
method,whichhasalsobeenreferredtoasanL-pouch,appearsto
providedecreasedfrequencyofbowelmovements.Furthermore,theLpouchislessbulkythanaCJP,allowingittoreachtheanalcanalwith
lessdifficulty.Thetechniquerequirestheprovisionofacolotomyonthe
antimesentericsurfaceofthecolon,measured5–6cmproximaltothe
stapledend.Thiscolotomyisthenanastomosedtotheanalcanalwith
interruptedsuturesviaatransanalapproachasdiscussedhereinbefore.

Step7:DivertingLoopIleostomyCreation
Theoperationisthenreturnedtotheabdomenanddiagnostic
laparoscopyisperformednotingthetension-freeanastomosis.Adrainis
guidedbehindtheneorectuminthepresacralspaceandbroughtout
throughtheleftlowerquadrantlaparoscopicportsite.Followingthis,a
loopofterminalileumapproximately20–25cmproximaltotheileocecal
valveisexteriorizedtofashionaloopileostomy.Itisbroughtoutthrough
theabdominalwallattheareapreviouslymarkedbythestomanurse.A
mesentericwindowiscreatedattheapexoftheloopandastandard
stomabridgerodisplacedwithinthismesentericwindowandsutured
intoplacetopreventthesmallbowelfromreducingbackintothe
peritoneum.Theileostomyismaturedonlyattheterminationofthe
operationtopreventspillageandwoundinfection.
Alllaparoscopicportsitesareremovedunderdirectvisualization.
Pneumoperitoneumisreleased.Fasciaandskinincisionsareclosedand
thedivertingBrookeloopileostomyismaturedinthestandardmanner.
Thedivertingstomaisreversedwithreestablishmentofintestinal
continuityperformedaftercompletionofpostoperativeadjuvanttherapy.
Generally,clinical,endoscopic,andradiologicexaminationofthe
anastomosisisperformedpriortoreversal.
OtherConsiderationsandNovelApproachestoTME
Dissection
Inrareinstances,distaldissectionintheTMEplanemaybechallenging.
Toovercomethis,overthepastcoupleofyears,anewtechniquehasbeen
devisedtohelpwiththedistaldissection,calledtransanalTME(taTME).
Thisprocedureperfomstheperinealportionusingamodificationofa
transanalminimallyinvasivesurgery(TAMIS,AppliedMedicalSystems,
CA)portwithlaparoscopicinstrumentation.Thereportedadvantagesof
thistaTMEprocedurearethatthedistalmarginisassuredaprioriand
supposedly,theTMEperformedfrombelowiseasier.Thistechniqueis
quitenovelandchallengingtoperform.Theplanesencounteredmaybe
difficulttoappreciateandurethralinjurieshavebeenreported.A
multicenternationalUStrialiscurrentlybeingfundedwithindustry
supportandthroughtheAmericanCollegeofColon&RectalSurgeons
andtheSocietyofAmericanGastrointestinalandEndoscopicSurgeons
andisduetostartin2017.Feasibility,oncological,andfunctional
outcomesfromthistrialareeagerlyawaited.
Itistheauthor’spreferencetoperformtransabdominal
intersphinctericdissectionsifatallpossible.Thisenablesthecreationof
astapled,ratherthanhand-sewnanastomosis.Theformergenerally
leadstoimprovedpostoperativefunctionandqualityoflife,likelyasa

resultofprecluded,andtherebydecreasedsphinctertrauma,duringthe
perinealintersphinctericdissection.Whenabletodissectdistallyusing
therobotictechniqueandstapleatthedentateline,astapledEEAdevice
isthenutilizedtocompletetheanastomosis.
p.176
p.177
Theauthor’spreferenceistoperformaBaker-typeside-to-end
anastomosiswhenaCJPcannotfitorbeconstructed.Whenperforming
handsewncoloanalanastomosis,theLonestarRetractorisremoved.To
reducetheriskoftumorimplantationandsubsequentlocalrecurrence,
cytocidalwashoutisperformed.ThepuncturesitesoftheLonestar
Retractorarealsoirrigatedastherehavebeenreportsoflocalrecurrence
atitspuncturesites.Arolled-uphemostaticfoamisplacedwithinthe
neorectum.
Irrespectiveofthemethodofrestorationofintestinalcontinuity,
double-stapledorhandsewn,imagingwithinjectionofindocyaninegreen
andendoscopicfluorescenceimagingandvisualization(Novadaq
Systems,Ontario,Canada)maythenbeperformedoftheanastomosisto
verifyappropriateandpromptvascularityofthecolonicconduitand
anastomosisanddistalanalcanal.

POSTOPERATIVEMANAGEMENT
AllpatientsundergoingIRParemanagedsimilartothoseundergoing
standardcolorectalprocedures—includingLARorAPR.Allpatientsare
preoperativelycounseledonourinstitution’smultimodalityenhanced
recoveryprotocol.Patientsarestartedonlow-residuedietimmediately
postoperatively.Narcoticopioidanalgesiaisminimizedwithapreference
fororalandintravenousnonsteroidalanti-inflammatorydrugs(NSAIDs).
Itiscurrentlynottheauthor’sroutinetoutilizecentralneuraxial
blockade(i.e.,intrathecalorspinalepidurals)ortransversusabdominis
planeblocks,thoughthelatterhasbeeneffectivelyutilizedinother
centers.Thepresacraldrainplacedatthetimeofoperationisalso
removedonceoutputisserosanguineousandlessthan100ml/day.Once
stomafunctionisappropriate(generally<1,300ml/day),patientsare
dischargedwithfollow-upappointmentswiththeostomynursein2
weeks.Patientsaregenerallyadvisedtowearpadsorgauzeperianallyto
captureanymucusorsanguineousdischargeintheimmediate
postoperativeperiod.Mostpatientsareabletobedischargedonoral
NSAIDswithminimal,ifany,narcoticopioids.Atapproximately2–6
weekspostoperatively,patientsmayundergoawater-solublecontrast
enemaand/orphysicalexaminationwithflexiblesigmoidoscopyto
evaluateforpatencyoftheanastomosisandalsotoexcludean
anastomoticleak.Ifaleakisfound,thesegenerallyresolvespontaneously
duringtheintervalinwhichpatientsareonadjuvantchemotherapy.
Nevertheless,ifaleakisobserved,reversalisnotperformeduntilaleakis
excludedorself-containedandminimal.Managementofanastomotic
leaksarecoveredseparatelyinthistext.
Outcomes
Ameta-analysisofpublishedcasesofintersphinctericproctectomy
revealedanoperativemortalityof1.6%,ananastomoticstricturerateof
5.8%,andananastomoticleakrateof10.5%.Neoadjuvant
chemoradiationsignificantlyaffectsthepatient’soncologicaland
functionaloutcomes.Muchefforthasbeenmadetowardfindingthe
effectsofthevariousmodificationsofthisprocedureonpatient
morbidity.Theuseoflaparoscopy,laterallymphadenectomy,andthe
varioustechniquesofcoloanalanastomosishavebeenevaluated.
ComplicationsandAnastomoticProblems
IRPsuffersfromananastomoticstricturerateof5.8%andan

anastomoticleakratebetween3%and11%.Ratesareseentorise
significantlyformoredistallysituatedanastomoses.Morbidsequelaeof
anastomoticleaksincludeanastomoticstrictures,cancerrecurrence,and
poorpostoperativeanorectalfunction.Theseanastomoticproblems,
especiallytheleaks,leadtosignificantmorbidityintheformofsepsisand
delayedornon-closureofstoma.Also,stricturesduetosepticpelvic
complicationsgreatlylimitcontinenceafteranyoftheaboverestorative
coloanalanastomoses.Intra-abdominalsepsisalsoresultedina
decreasedabilitytoachievearousal.Inanattempttominimizethese
complications,authorshavestudiedthevariousmannersof
gastrointestinalrestorationinthesepatientsinanattempttouncoverthe
methodthatismostlikelytohealwithoutanastomoticproblems.
Therewassomethoughtthatduetoabetterbloodsupplyinpatients
undergoingpouchprocedures,theiranastomosismayhealbetterwitha
resultantdecreaseintherateofclinicallysignificantanastomoticleaks.
Thistheoryseemedtobesupportedbyinitialreportsindicatingthat
therewasaclinicallysignificantlowerincidenceofanastomoticleaks
followingcolonicpouchanastomosis(2%)comparedwiththoseincaseof
non-pouchCAA(15%).
p.177
p.178
Studiesevaluatingthemicrocirculationattheanastomosisdidnot
revealtheexpectedresults.Onegroup,utilizinglaserfluorescence
videography,evaluatedthemicrocirculationaroundanastomosisafter
rectalresectionindogs.Theycomparedend-to-end,side-to-end,andJpouchcoloanalanastomosis.BowelperfusionwasevaluatedusingICViewlaserfluorescencevideography.Interestingly,itwasdiscoveredthat
straightcoloanalanastomosesprovidesbetteranastomotic
microcirculationafterrectalresectionsthanCJPanalanastomosesor
side-to-endanastomoses.
LaterstudiesrevealedthedifferenceinleakratesbetweenCPAand
CAAtobeduetoaconfoundingvariable.Inthisstudy,fecaldiversion
wasperformedinonly59%ofpatientswithCAAandin71%withCPA.A
follow-upstudybythesamegroupwithaprotectiveileostomyinall
patientsshowednosignificantdifferences.Theseresultshavesincethen
beenconfirmedbyotherstudies.Later,randomizedstudieslookingat
leakratesbetweenTCPandCJPandaside-to-endanastomosisalso
revealednoclinicallysignificantdifference.
Reviewingthelatestsingleandmulticenterreports,anastomoticleaks
andfistulaearenotedtobetheprimarymorbidityassociatedwithIRP.
Mortalityisverylow(Table20-1).

TABLE20-1
ComplicationsafterIntersphinctericProctectomy
N
Anastomotic
leak Fistula Stricture
Abdominal
woundinfection
Cardiac
event
Weiser,2009 44 2 2 7 3 1
Han,2009 40 1 2
Yamada,2009 107 5 9 4
Ito,2009 96 1
Chamlou,2007 90 8 1/8 1 1
Schiessel,2005 121 6 2 11(late,
cons.Tx)
Tilney,2007
and2008
Meta-analysis
612 49(10.5) 12(5.8)
NR,notreported;PE/DVT,pulmonaryembolism/deepveinthrombosis;UGIB,uppergastrointestinal
bleeding;UTI,urinarytractinfection.

OUTCOMESRESULTS
QualityIndicatorsandPathologicalComparisons
WhenevaluatingpatientsundergoingIRPforrectalcancer,certain
pathologicalresultshavebeenrealized.PatientsundergoingIRP
generallyhadalower-stage(y)pT1-2,greaterresponsetoneoadjuvant
chemoradiationtherapy,increasedrateofTdownstaging,andlowergradedifferentiationthanthosepatientsundergoingAPR(Table20-2).
MostofthesereportsalsodemonstratedanacceptableDRMaswellasa
generous/acceptablenegativeCRMwithanacceptablestage-for-stageLR
recurrencerates.InthemostrecentdatapublishedfromMemorialSloan
KetteringCancerCenter,patientsundergoingIRPandstapled
anastomoses(forhigherlesions)hadequivalentlowLRrates,andwere
significantlylowerthanthosepatientsnecessitatingAPR(Table20-3).
TABLE20-2
PathologicalResultsofIntersphinctericProctectomy
Stage/(y)pTNM ResponsetoCMT
0 I II III IV 100%/pCR 86–99%
Weiser,2009 11(25) 16(36) 12(27) 5(11) 11(27)
*
10(24)
*
Han,2009 18(45) 6(15) 16(40)
Yamada,2009 48(45) 24(22) 35(33)
Chamlou,2007 6(8) 37(41) 16(18) 25(28) 5(6)
Schiessel,2005 49(41) 33(28) 37(31)
*
P<0.05whencomparedwiththatofabdominoperinealresection.
CMT,combined-modalitytherapy/neoadjuvantchemoradiationtherapy;N-stage;M-stage;pTNM,
pathologicalT-stage;y,afterneoadjuvanttherapy.
p.178
p.179
TABLE20-3
QualityIndicatorsofResection
Mediandistal
%+CRM≤1mm

resectionmargin LAR/stapled LAR/IRP APR LAR/stapled
Weiser,2009 1cm(0.1–3.5) 0/41 2/44(5)
8/63(13)
*
1/41(2)
Schiessel,2005 3%
Hohenberger,2006 4%
Rullier,2005 11%
Portier,2007
Koehler,2000
Ito,2009 1.5(2.2–5.5) 3/96(3%)
Chamlou,2007 1.2(0.5–35) 4/90
(4.4%)
Han,2009 0/40
Tilney,2007
Meta-analysis
0.7–2.4
MostofthesereportsdemonstratedanacceptableDRMaswellasagenerous/acceptablenegative
circumferentialresectionmargin(CRM)withacceptablestage-for-stagelocoregional(LR)recurrence
rates.InthemostrecentdatapublishedfromMemorialSloanKetteringCancerCenter,patients
undergoingISRDandstapledanastomoses(forhigherlesions)hadequivalentlowLRrates,and
significantlylowerthanthosepatientsnecessitatingabdominoperinealresection(APR).
IRP,intersphinctericrestorativeproctocolectomy;LAR,lowanteriorresection.
*
P<0.05.
CRM,circumferentialresectionmargin;LR,locoregionalrecurrence.
OncologicOutcomes
SomeauthorshavewonderedifthepooroncologicalresultsfromAPR
comparedwithLARareduetoanunknownnaturalhistoryofverylow
rectalcancers,withpotentiallymphnodemetastasesoutsideofthe
mesorectalenvelope.IRPisapotentialintermediarythatmaybeableto
illuminatethatconcernasitoftendealswiththesametumorsasanAPR
residinginthelowestpartoftherectum.
InIRP,oncologicoutcomesasmeasuredbyrecurrence-freesurvival
anddisease-specificsurvivaldonotseemtobedifferent,andareindeed
equivalenttothosefollowingLARwithstapledanastomosis.Recently,a
studyon62consecutivepatientsfromSouthKoreaundergoingIRPfor
distalT2andT3rectalcancer(withoutneoadjuvantchemoradiation
therapy),reporteda5-yearoverallsurvivalrateof94.7–95.8%.Similarly,
recurrence-freesurvivalwasreportedat86.8–87.5%.Inaseparatestudy
comparingCAAwithoutresectionoftheinternalsphinctertoIRPfor
rectalcancer,thedifferenceinthe5-yearactuarialrateforlocal

recurrenceandtheoverallactuarialsurvivalratewasnotfoundtobe
clinicallysignificant.Aswithotherformsofrectalresection,thedistant
metastasisrateforcaseswithlymphnodemetastasishasbeenobserved
tobesignificantlyhigherthanthatforcaseswithoutlymphnode
metastasis.
ItappearsthatIRPwithnegativemarginsisnoworsethanLAR,and
generallybetterthanAPRfromthestandpointofoncologicoutcomes.
Weiserpublishedaseriescomparingthreecohortsofpatientsundergoing
resectionforrectalcancer.Patientswerestratifiedbythosewhowere
abletoundergoLARwithstapledanastomosis,LARwithintersphincteric
restorativeproctectomy,andhandsewncoloanalanastomosis,andthose
requiringAPR.Whenlookingat(y)pT3+patients,bothrecurrence-free
survivalanddisease-specificsurvivalwereequivalentforbothLAR
groupsandsignificantlybetterthantheAPRgroup.Five-yearrecurrencefreesurvivalrateswere85%,83%,and47%and5-yeardisease-specific
survivalrateswere97%,96%,and59%,respectively,demonstratinga
statisticallysignificantdifferencebetweentheAPRgroupandthetwo
LARgroups.Similardataareobtainedfromothertrialssupportingthe
acceptableoncologicaloutcomesandbenefitsofIRP.Whenableto
undergointersphinctericproctectomy,patientshadcomparable
oncologicaloutcomestopatientsundergoingLARwithconventional
stapledanastomoses,andsignificantlyimprovedoutcomestothose
requiringAPR(Table20-4).
TABLE20-4
RecurrenceandSurvival
Median
F/U
5-yRFS
LAR/stapled(%) LAR/IRP(%) APR(%) LAR/stapled(%)
Weiser,2009 47 85 83 47 97
Ito,2009(3-y) 96 87
Tiret,2007 56.2 77
Han,2009 43 94
Rullier,2005
Shiessel,2005 94 92.5
Tilney,2007
Meta-analysis
*
P<0.05whencomparedwithLARwitheitherstapledorIRP/hand-sewncoloanalanastomosis.
ARP,abdominoperinealresection;IRP,intersphinctericrestorativeproctocolectomy;LAR,lowanterior
resection;RFS,recurrence-freesurvival;DSS,disease-specificsurvival;OS,overallsurvival.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
