Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5786_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Contributors
- •Preface
- •1. Physics and instrumentation
- •Introduction
- •Sound
- •Short History of the Development of Ultrasound in Medicine
- •Near Field and Far Field
- •Focusing
- •Sound, Waves and Propagation
- •One Transducer for Each Purpose
- •The Ultrasound Beam
- •Resolution
- •Measurement
- •Time Gain Compensation
- •Artifacts
- •Edge Shadows
- •Attenuation Shadows
- •Enhancement
- •Reverberations
- •References
- •Further reading
- •2. Biological effects and safety aspects
- •Introduction
- •Acoustic Output of Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanners
- •Tissue Warming by Diagnostic Ultrasound
- •Non-Thermal Mechanisms and their Safety Implications
- •Gas Body Effects of Diagnostic Ultrasound
- •Other Mechanical Bioeffects Mechanisms
- •Evidence from Epidemiology
- •The Management of Safety
- •The Users' Responsibility
- •Thermal indices
- •Mechanical index
- •The Manufacturers' Obligations
- •Safety Practice
- •Diagnostic Ultrasound During the First Trimester
- •Scanning During the Second and Third Trimesters
- •Obstetric Scanning on Patients with Fever
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •3. Scanning techniques in obstetrics and gynaecology
- •Introduction
- •General Aspects
- •Empty or Full Bladder
- •Patient Information
- •The Examination Table
- •Bimanual Pelvic Examination Preceding the Scan
- •Equipment
- •Orientation
- •Scanning Routine
- •Obstetric Scanning
- •Biophysical profile
- •Gynaecological Scanning
- •The uterus
- •The cervix
- •The myometrium
- •The endometrium
- •Adnexal Masses
- •Peritoneal Fluid
- •Urinary Bladder
- •Other Findings
- •Colour Doppler Studies
- •Screening for Ovarian Masses
- •Transperineal and Transrectal Scanning
- •Ultrasound-Guided Puncture Procedures
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •4. Investigation of early pregnancy
- •Introduction
- •Description of the Sonoanatomic Development
- •Measurements of the Embryo/Early Fetus
- •Extraembryonic Structures: The Three Sacs
- •Multiple Pregnancy: Determination of Chorionicity and Amnionicity
- •Evaluation of Early Pregnancy Failure
- •Early Pregnancy Loss
- •Gestational sac (chorionic cavity) and amniotic cavity
- •Yolk sac
- •Haematoma
- •Heart rate
- •Trophoblastic Disease
- •Complete hydatidiform mole
- •Partial hydatidiform mole
- •Invasive hydatidiform mole
- •Choriocarcinoma
- •Ectopic Pregnancy
- •Early Anomalies
- •Standardization of Transvaginal and Transabdominal Imaging in Gynaecology
- •Imaging in Medicine
- •References
- •5. Normal fetal anatomy at 18–22 weeks
- •Introduction
- •Scan Guidelines
- •Normal Fetal Anatomy
- •Brain/Calvarium
- •Transthalamic view
- •Transventricular view
- •Heart
- •Transcerebellar view
- •Face and Neck
- •Spine
- •Lungs and Thorax
- •Abdomen
- •Anterior Abdominal Wall
- •Urinary Tract
- •Genitalia
- •Skeleton and Extremities
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •6. Amniotic fluid and placental localization
- •Amniotic Fluid
- •Amniotic Fluid Physiology
- •Fetal urinary production
- •Lung fluid
- •Flow across the chorionic plate
- •Amniotic Fluid Volume
- •Methods of assessment
- •Normal amniotic fluid volume values
- •Abnormal amniotic fluid volumes
- •Oligohydramnios
- •Polyhydramnios
- •Conclusions
- •Placenta Localization
- •Embryology
- •Functional anatomy
- •Development of the placenta as evaluated by ultrasound technology
- •Indications for the Location of the Placenta
- •Various locations of the placenta
- •Placenta praevia
- •Suggested management protocol for suspected placenta praevia
- •Placental Morphology
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •7. Assessment of the placenta and umbilical cord
- •Introduction
- •Major Structural Abnormalities of the Placenta
- •Congenital Abnormalities
- •Abnormalities of placentation
- •Placenta extrachorialis
- •Placenta accreta
- •Placental tumours
- •Mesenchymal tumours
- •Gestational trophoblastic tumours (GTD)
- •Secondary Abnormalities
- •Vascular abnormalities
- •Thrombosis and infarcts
- •Haematomas
- •Major Structural Abnormalities of the Umbilical Cord
- •Congenital Abnormalities
- •Abnormalities of the cord insertion
- •Single umbilical artery (SUA) syndrome
- •Cord tumours
- •Secondary Abnormalities
- •Vascular abnormalities
- •Haematomas and thrombosis
- •Vascular abnormalities
- •Abnormal cord position
- •References
- •8. Examining the cervix by transvaginal ultrasound
- •Introduction
- •Transvaginal Ultrasound of the Cervix Predicts Preterm Delivery
- •Measurement Technique
- •Transvaginal Ultrasound of the Cervix in the Clinical Judgement of Preterm Labour
- •Treatment of Cervical Incompetence
- •Prophylactic Cerclage or Transvaginal Follow-Up of the Cervix
- •Prophylactic Treatment with Progesterone in Pregnant Women with Short Cervix
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •9. Fetal biometry, estimation of gestational age, assessment of fetal growth
- •Principles of Fetal Biometry
- •Aims of Fetal Biometry
- •The Reference Values
- •Patient Selection and Study Design
- •Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Studies
- •Sample Size
- •Displaying Data and Curve Fitting
- •Linear regression analysis
- •Curvilinear regression analysis
- •The coefficients of correlation
- •The F test
- •Prediction of Date and Size
- •The Confidence Limits
- •Dating
- •Menstrual, Conceptual and Gestational Age
- •Errors of Measurements
- •The Accuracy of Dating
- •Biometric Parameters
- •Gestational Sac
- •Crown–Rump Length
- •Head Measures
- •Abdominal Size
- •Limbs
- •Other Measurements and Dating
- •Data Report
- •Fetal Weight Estimation
- •Biometric Ratios
- •Other Parameters
- •Evaluation of Fetal Growth
- •Definition
- •Unsolved Problems
- •Screening and Diagnostic Strategies
- •Fetal Growth Restriction
- •Macrosomia
- •Fetal Biometry, Anomalies and Syndromes
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •10. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies
- •An Introduction to Congenital Anomalies
- •Central Nervous System Anomalies
- •Neural Tube Defects
- •Ventriculomegaly
- •Holoprosencephaly
- •Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum
- •Dandy–Walker Complex
- •Microcephaly
- •Destructive Cerebral Lesions
- •Choroid Plexus cysts
- •Craniofacial Anomalies
- •Facial Clefts
- •Ocular and Orbital Defects
- •Cardiac Anomalies
- •Atrial and Ventricular Septal Defects
- •Atrioventricular septal defects
- •Heterotaxy
- •Univentricular Heart
- •Aortic Stenosis
- •Coarctation, Tubular Hypoplasia and Interruption of the Aortic Arch
- •Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome
- •Pulmonary Stenosis and Pulmonary Atresia
- •Conotruncal Malformations
- •Ebstein's Anomaly and Tricuspid Valve Dysplasia
- •Echogenic Foci
- •Cardiac Dysrhythmias
- •Thoracic Anomalies
- •Hyperechogenic and Cystic Lungs
- •Pleural effusions
- •Diaphragmatic Hernia
- •Anomalies of the Abdominal Wall and Gastrointestinal Tract
- •Omphalocele
- •Gastroschisis
- •Body Stalk Anomaly
- •Bladder Exstrophy and Cloacal Exstrophy
- •Oesophageal Atresia
- •Duodenal Atresia
- •Intestinal Obstruction
- •Echogenic Bowel
- •Meconium Peritonitis
- •Abdominal Cysts
- •Anomalies of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract
- •Renal Agenesis
- •Cystic Kidneys
- •Urinary Tract Enlargement
- •Skeletal Anomalies
- •Fetal Tumours
- •Hydrops Fetalis
- •Chromosomal Defects
- •Ultrasound Findings with Chromosomal Aberrations
- •Individual Risk Assessment of Chromosomal Aberrations by the use of Midtrimester Ultrasound
- •Absent or hypoplastic nasal bone (<2.5 mm)
- •Nuchal oedema or fold more than 6mm
- •Hyperechogenic bowel
- •Short femur
- •Echogenic foci in the heart
- •Choroid plexus cysts
- •Mild hydronephrosis
- •Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Detection of Fetal Anomalies
- •Conclusion
- •Note
- •References
- •11. Evaluation of fetal and uteroplacental blood flow
- •Introduction
- •Uterine Artery Doppler
- •Umbilical Artery Doppler
- •Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler
- •MCA in Fetal Growth Restriction
- •MCA in Fetal Anaemia
- •Ductus Venosus
- •Umbilical Vein
- •Doppler in Twin Pregnancies
- •References
- •12. Invasive procedures in obstetrics
- •Introduction
- •Counselling
- •Training
- •The Procedures
- •Asepsis
- •Chorionic Villous Sampling
- •Chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations
- •Safety
- •Amniocentesis
- •Safety
- •Amniocentesis in multiple gestations
- •Fetal Blood Sampling
- •Technique
- •Complications
- •Intrauterine Fetal Blood Transfusion
- •Complications
- •Fetal Shunts
- •Techniques
- •Complications
- •Delivery and shunt removal
- •Outcome
- •Diagnostic and Operative Fetoscopy
- •Pregnancy Reduction in Multifetal Pregnancies
- •Technique
- •Selective Fetocide for Fetal Abnormality
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •13. Multiple pregnancies
- •Introduction
- •First-Trimester Ultrasound
- •Pregnancy Dating
- •Number of Fetuses
- •Chorionicity and Amnionicity
- •Nuchal Translucency
- •Invasive Diagnostic Procedures
- •Growth Discrepancy and Fetal Monitoring
- •Malformations and Fetal Demise
- •Twin–Twin Transfusion Syndrome
- •Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion
- •Monoamniotic Twins
- •Higher-Order Multiple Pregnancies
- •References
- •14. Three-dimensional and four-dimensional ultrasound application in prenatal diagnosis
- •Introduction
- •Volume Acquisition
- •Static 3D
- •Real-Time 3D or 4D Ultrasound
- •Spatial and Temporal Image Correlation
- •Volume Data Display
- •Single Plane of Choice, Multiplanar Orthogonal Planes or Multiple Tomographic Parallel Slices
- •Surface Mode Rendering
- •Maximum Mode Rendering
- •Minimum Mode Rendering
- •Inversion Mode Rendering
- •Glass Body Mode Rendering
- •Volume Calculation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •15. Fetal movement patterns and behavioural states
- •Introduction
- •Methodology
- •The Emergence of Fetal Movement Patterns
- •Body Movements in Normal Pregnancy
- •Fetal Breathing in Normal Pregnancy
- •Normal Development of Fetal Behavioural States
- •Altered Brain or Muscular Development
- •Intrauterine Growth Retardation (IUGR)
- •Maternal Diabetes
- •Preterm Contractions and/or Rupture of Membranes
- •Drugs, Medication, Stress and Fetal Stimulation
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •16. Normal gynaecological anatomy (uterus, tubes, ovaries)
- •Introduction
- •Normal Ultrasound Morphology of the Cervix Uteri
- •Normal Ultrasound Morphology of the Uterus in Women of Fertile Age
- •Normal Ultrasound Morphology of the Ovaries in Women of Fertile Age
- •Normal Ultrasound Morphology of the Uterus and Ovaries in Postmenopausal Women
- •Normal Ultrasound Morphology of the Uterus and Ovaries in Menopausal Transition
- •Normal Uterine and Ovarian Vascularization as Assessed by Doppler Ultrasound Technique
- •The Tubes
- •The Pouch of Douglas
- •Hydrosonography
- •Hystero-Contrast Salpingosonography (HyCoSy)
- •Acknowledgements
- •References
- •17. Gynaecological pathology: the uterus
- •Introduction
- •Congenital Uterine Anomalies
- •Uterine Fibroids
- •Uterine Sarcoma
- •Adenomyosis
- •Endometrial Polyps
- •Endometrial Hyperplasia and Malignancy
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •18. Gynaecological pathology: tubes and ovaries
- •Ovaries
- •Benign and Malignant Ovarian Cysts: General Considerations
- •Tumour Size
- •Tumour Structure
- •Cyst Wall and Septal Wall Thickness
- •Echo-Dense Foci and Acoustic Shadowing
- •Echogenicity
- •Morphology Scoring Systems
- •Benign and Malignant Neoplasms of the Ovary
- •Dysfunctional ovarian cysts
- •Follicle cysts
- •Corpus luteum cysts
- •Thecalutein cysts
- •Endometriosis
- •Epithelial ovarian tumours
- •Serous ovarian tumours
- •Mucinous ovarian tumours
- •Fibromas and fibrothecomas
- •Germ cell tumours
- •Adnexal Torsion
- •Tubes
- •Non-Infectious Diseases of the Fallopian Tubes
- •Tubal pregnancy
- •Fallopian tube carcinoma
- •Hydrosalpinx
- •Infectious Diseases of the Fallopian Tubes
- •Note
- •References
- •19. Doppler ultrasonography in gynaecology
- •Introduction
- •Adnexal Masses
- •Other Pelvic Pathology
- •In Vitro Fertilization
- •References
- •20. Medico-legal implications of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynaecology
- •Introduction
- •The Legal Process
- •The Trial Process
- •Reducing the Risk of Litigation
- •Never undertake a type of scan with which you are not entirely familiar (unless in a learning environment)
- •Record sample images (and be able to retrieve them)
- •Always act professionally and responsibly
- •Be aware of the common traps (and avoid them!)
- •If the scan is suboptimal, say so and explain why
- •Ensure the equipment is appropriate
- •Defending a Claim
- •Recording Images
- •Documentation
- •Conclusion
- •21. Ethics and patient information
- •Introduction
- •Ethics, Medical Ethics and Ethical Principles
- •The Principle of Beneficence
- •The Principle of Respect for Autonomy
- •The Interaction of Beneficence and Respect for Autonomy in Clinical Judgement and Practice
- •The Ethical Concept of the Fetus as a Patient
- •The viable fetal patient
- •The previable fetal patient
- •Clinical Topics
- •Competence and Referral in Ultrasound Examination
- •Routine Ultrasound Screening and Risk Assessment of Pregnant Women
- •Disclosure of Results of Ultrasound Examinations
- •Confidentiality of Findings
- •Conclusion
- •References
- •Test yourself – questions and answers
- •Chapter 2 Biological Effects and Safety Aspects
- •Chapter 4 Investigation of Early Pregnancy
- •Chapter 5 Normal Fetal Anatomy at 18–22 Weeks
- •Chapter 6 Amniotic Fluid and Placental Localization
- •Chapter 10 Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Anomalies
- •Chapter 12 Invasive Procedures in Obstetrics
- •Chapter 13 Multiple Pregnancies
- •Chapter 17 Gynaecological Pathology: The Uterus
- •Chapter 19 Doppler Ultrasonography in Gynaecology
- •Chapter 21 Ethics and Patient Information
- •Answers
- •Index

✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
with dyspnoea, abdominal pain and neurological symptoms. The primary symptom is vaginal bleeding. Choriocarcinoma may be found after a molar pregnancy, a miscarriage or after an apparently normal pregnancy. The sonographic
appearance of a choriocarcinoma resembles that of an invasive mole. The primary tumour of a choriocarcinoma in an apparently normal placenta is usually
small, less than 8 mm. So far, such a primary tumour has not been described
sonographically.
27
ECTOPIC PREGNANCY
A common cause for early pregnancy failure in the western world is ectopic
pregnancy. The prevalence of this condition is nearly 2%, accounting for 9% of
pregnancy-related deaths of reproductive-aged women in the first trimester in
the USA.29 There are many risk factors, the highest risk being found in patients
who have had tubal surgery including sterilization, previous ectopic pregnancy, in
utero exposure to diethylstilboestrol, IUD and documented tubal pathology.
Early diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy is important because it contributes to a
decline in morbidity, maternal deaths and treatment costs. As the identification of
an ectopic pregnancy can be difficult, the first step in ruling out ectopic pregnancy
should be to identify intrauterine pregnancy which can virtually always be identified after 5.5 weeks by transvaginal ultrasound. Quantitative hCG serum analysis
is an important additional test, when an intrauterine pregnancy cannot be seen.
Ectopic pregnancy should be assumed when the hCG serum test is above the discriminatory zone in which a pregnancy should always be detected by transvaginal sonography (TVS) (β-hCG concentrations =1500 IU/L).30 Sonographically,
an extrauterine gestational sac surrounded by an echogenic ring consisting of the
trophoblast at the implantation is usually seen (Fig. 4.18). Other ultrasound signs
for ectopic pregnancy are any non-cystic extraovarian adnexal mass, complex cystic or solid masses and, of course, a living ectopic pregnancy, which is found in
approximately 5–15% of cases. Viability of ectopic pregnancies can be evaluated
by transvaginal Doppler ultrasound because of the good vascularization of the
trophoblastic ring.
The scan for ectopic pregnancies must be performed thoroughly and systematically. One must be aware of special ectopic locations such as interstitial pregnancy, which occurs in 1–6% of all ectopic pregnancies,31 or cervical pregnancy,
which accounts for only 0.15%.32 The ultrasound diagnosis of an interstitial pregnancy is made when products of conception are visible in the upper lateral aspect
of the uterus, outside the uterine cavity and at least partially surrounded by myometrium.31 In cervical pregnancies, the gestational sac is found below the internal
os of the uterus. To miss the diagnosis of these two variants of ectopic pregnancy
imposes extraordinary risks to affected women, because these conditions may
lead to acute life-threatening bleeding, which may be difficult to treat. One must
also be aware of the possibility of concomitant intrauterine and ectopic pregnancies. The occurrence of heterotopic pregnancies is increased in pregnancies
achieved by assisted fertilization.
30
Investigation of early pregnancy
73

✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
A
B
Uterus
Ovary
Ovary
Ectopic
pregnancy
leftright
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Fig. 4.18 Ectopic pregnancy. (A) Transverse section through the female pelvis; ovary on the
right side of the uterus. (B) Laterally from the right ovary an ectopic pregnancy with a living
embryo can be seen. See also standardization, Fig. 4.21.
74
A review of six different diagnostic algorithms for ectopic pregnancy concluded that a combination of ultrasound and hCG resulted in the best outcomes.
Ultrasound as the first step was the most efficient and accurate method of diagnosing ectopic pregnancy.
29
EARLY ANOMALIES
High-frequency transvaginal transducers have made it possible to disclose structural developmental disorders of the embryo (before 10 weeks) and the young
fetus. An increasing number of studies, reviews and case reports describe ultrasound detection of early anomalies.
Nuchal translucency (NT), which may be found at the early 11–13-week-scan,
is a well-known transient marker for fetal disorders.38 Both the transabdominal
and the transvaginal approach can be used. Though NT is seen in normal fetuses,
it is not only highly associated with chromosomal aberrations, but it may also be
found in fetuses with skeletal anomalies, neuromuscular disorders, rare genetic
disorders, heart defects or infections.38 The likelihood for associated anomalies increases with the thickness of the oedema. Nicolaides and colleagues have
described the criteria of NT measurements: CRL 45–83 mm, 11 weeks 0 days to
13 weeks 6 days, preferably but not necessarily TVS, and good sagittal section of
the fetus with appropiate magnification. The maximum thickness of subcutaneous translucency is measured by placing the calipers on the inner lines.
33–37
38

✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
The absence of nasal bone ossification at the end of the first trimester is another
marker for possible abnormal development, namely trisomy 21. Evidence based
on radiological, histomorphological and sonographic studies has shown that nasal
bone abnormalities are significantly more common in trisomy 21 fetuses than in
euploid fetuses.
39
STANDARDIZATION OF TRANSVAGINAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL IMAGING IN GYNAECOLOGY
In 1992, Timor-Tritsch discussed an inquiry performed by Bernaschek and
Deutinger 40 that revealed a world-wide discord about the way TVS images were
displayed.41 Timor-Tritsch's recommendation was: ‘Let's all talk the same language!’. To help us talk the same language, we should review some of the basic rules
taught at medical school, rules that probably represent a world-wide standard.
When we examine a patient, we principally position ourselves on the patient's
right side and face the patient. This is the starting point of every examination.
When we look at the patient we see the patient's left shoulder on the right. We
can imagine we are viewing a ‘screen’ with our own eyes. When gynaecologists
perform an examination of the uterus and adnex, they will find the patient's
left ovary/adnexa on the right side (of the screen/picture), and the patient's right
ovary/adnexa on the left side.
Investigation of early pregnancy
IMAGING IN MEDICINE
Pictures of organs or parts of the body should present the normal anatomical
relations as exactly as possible. The argument for displaying the TVS pictures
on the monitor with the ‘footprint’ of the vaginal probe at the bottom of the
screen close to the cervix, while the fundus of the uterus points towards the top
of the screen, seems correct and self-explanatory.41 In essence, this would be the
‘natural’ way to display the uterus on the screen, at least through the eyes of a
practising gynaecologist who performs a bimanual examination on a patient in
the supine position. The cervix would be at the tip of the examining fingers and
the fundus of the uterus further away, i.e. cephalad. An additional advantage of
displaying the picture with the apex of the ‘pie’ pointing downward or upward
would be the ability to tell instantly the difference between an image obtained
by the transvaginal or transabdominal route: the apex of the ‘pie’ pointing to the
bottom of the screen on the transvaginal picture and to the top of the screen on
the transabdominal scan.
There are more arguments for this form of imaging. If we move the transabdominal transducer from the midsagittal plane to the left or to the right, we will
identify the ovaries lying close to and ‘below’ the iliac vessels. This is the normal
relation: the ovary is in a mediodorsal position to the iliac vessels. In the TVS
image display, this anatomical relation should be maintained.
For the transverse plane, the transducer is rotated 90 ° to the left, imaging the
right adnexa on the left side of the picture and vice versa for the left adnexa.
75

✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
CaudalCranial
Ventral
Dorsal
LeftRight
Ventral/cranial
Dorsal/caudal
90
CaudalCranial
Ventral
Dorsal
Fig. 4.19 Transabdominal sonography (TAS) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) of the
female pelvis; sagittal insonation angle.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
76
Fig. 4.20 Direction of the sagittal imaging sectors of TAS and TVS through the female pelvis.
Note that the cranial part of the pelvis points to the left side, and the caudal part points to
the right side. Imagine that the observer's position is on the right side of the patient.
Fig. 4.21 By turning the transducers 90˚, a transverse section of the pelvis is shown. Note
that the right part of the pelvis is shown on the left side of the image, and the left part on
the right side. Imagine that the observer looks at the patient's body from below.

✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
By simply looking at the image, it should be easy to distinguish whether the
scan was done by TVS or TAS. Further, it must be possible to correlate TVS and
TAS images from the same patient. When TVS and TAS images are standardized
as indicated above, it is easy to recognize a TAS (‘pie apex up’) from a TVS (‘pie
apex down’). In the transverse plane we will expect to find the patient's left ovary
on the right side of the image and in the sagittal plane we will expect to find the
bladder on the right side. If the uterus is pointing towards the right in a sagittal
plane it is anteflexion; if it is pointing to the left, it is retroversion – no further
explanation needed.
References
Investigation of early pregnancy
1. Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the
medical causes of miscarriage. Baillière's
Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;14(5):839–854
2. Blaas H-GK. Editorial: the examination
of the embryo and early fetus: how and
by whom? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
1999;14(3):153–158
3. Takeuchi H. Transvaginal ultrasound in the
first trimester of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev
1992;29:381–384
4. Timor-Tritsch IE, Farine D, Rosen MG.
A close look at the embryonic development
with the high frequency transvaginal
transducer. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1988;159:678–681
5. Timor-Tritsch IE, Peisner DB, Raju S.
Sonoembryology: an organ-oriented
approach using a high-frequency vaginal
probe. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:286–298
6. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the forebrain and
midbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study
from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:183–192
7. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the hindbrain:
a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to
12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 1995;5:151–160
8. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the abdominal
wall, stomach and heart from 7 to 12 weeks
of gestation: a longitudinal ultrasound study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:240–249
9. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Bremnes JB.
Embryonic growth. A longitudinal
biometric ultrasound study. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 1998;12(5):346–354
10. Zalen-Sprock R, Brons JTJ, Vugt J, Harten
H, Geijn H. Ultrasonographic and radiologic
visualization of the developing embryonic
skeleton. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
1997;9:392–397
11. Robinson HP, Fleming JEE. A critical
evaluation of sonar ‘crown-rump length’
measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol
1975;82:702–710
12. Reece EA, Scioscia AL, Green J, O'Connor
TZ, Hobbins J. Embryonic trunk
circumference: a new biometric parameter
for estimation of gestational age. Am J
Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:713–715
13. Robinson HP, Shaw-Dunn J. Fetal heart
rates as determined by sonar in early
pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Cwlth
1973;80:805–809
14. Cyr DR, Mack LA, Schoenecker SA
et al. Bowel migration in the normal
fetus: ultrasound detection. Radiology
1986;161:119–121
15. Timor-Tritsch IE, Warren WB, Peisner
DB, Pirrone E. First trimester midgut
herniation: a high frequency transvaginal
sonographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1989;161:466–476
16. O'Rahilly R, Müller F. Developmental
stages in human embryos. Carnegie Institute
Publications, Washington, DC
17. Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Early
and simple determination of chorionic and
amniotic type in multifetal gestations in
the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency
transvaginal sonography. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 1994;170:824–829
18. Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Hughes K, Odibo
A, Nicolaides KH. The lambda sign at
10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of
chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 1996;7(6):421–423
19. Waard MW, Bonsel GJ, Ankum WM, Vos
J, Bindels PJE. Threatened miscarriage in
general practice: diagnostic value of history
taking and physical examination. Br J Gen
Pract 2002;52(483):825–829
20. Jauniaux E, Johns J, Burton G. The role
of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and
77

✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
investigating early pregnancy failure.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:613–624
21. Falco P, Milano V, Pilu G et al. Sonography
of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding
and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic
indicators by logistic regression analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;7:165–169
22. Makrydimas G, Sebire NJ, Lolis D, Vlassis
N, Nicolaides KH. Fetal loss following
ultrasound diagnosis of a live fetus at 6-10
weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 2003;22:368–372
23. Jauniaux E, Kaminopetros P, El-Rafaey H.
Early pregnancy loss. In: Rodeck J, Whittle
M (eds) Fetal medicine: basic science and
clinical practice. Harcourt Brace, London,
1999: 835–847
24. Tower C, Regan L. Intrauterine haematomas
in a recurrent miscarriage population. Hum
Reprod 2001;16(9):2005–2007
25. Schats R, Jansen CAM, Wladimiroff JW.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Abnormal embryonic heart rate pattern in
early pregnancy associated with Down's
syndrome. Hum Reprod 1990;5(7):877–879
26. Achiron R, Tadmor O, Mashiach S. Heart
rate as a predictor of first-trimester
spontaneous abortion after ultrasoundproven viability. Obstet Gynecol
1991;78:330–334
27. Jauniaux E. Ultrasound diagnosis and
follow-up of gestational trophoblastic
disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
1998;11:367–377
28. Fowler DJ, Lindsay I, Seckl MJ, Sebire
NJ. Routine pre-evacuation ultrasound
diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: experience
of more than 1000 cases from a regional
referral center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2006;27:56–60
29. Gracia C, Barnhart K. Diagnosing ectopic
pregnancy: decision analysis comparing six
strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:464–470
30. Pisarska M, Carson S, Buster J. Ectopic
pregnancy. Lancet 1998;351(9109):1115–1120
31. Hafner T, Aslam N, Ross J, Zosmer N,
Jurkovic D. The effectiveness of non-surgical
management of early interstitial pregnancy:
a case report of ten cases and review of
the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
1999;13:131–136
32. Jurkovic D, Hacket E, Campbell S.
Diagnosis and treatment of early cervical
pregnancy: a review and a report of two
cases treated conservatively. Ultrasound
Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:373–380
33. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH. First-trimester
diagnosis of fetal malformations. In: Rodeck
J, Whittle M (eds) Fetal medicine: basic
science and clinical practice. Harcourt
Brace, London, 1999: 581–597
34. Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Isaksen CV.
The detection of spina bifida before 10
gestational weeks using 2D- and 3D
ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
2000;16:25–29
35. Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Vainio T, Isaksen
CV. Alobar holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks
gestational age visualized by two- and threedimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 2000;15:62–65
36. Rottem S, Bronshtein M. Transvaginal
sonographic diagnosis of congenital
anomalies between 9 weeks and 16
weeks menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound
1990;18:307–314
37. Souka AP, Nikolaides KH. Diagnosis of fetal
abnormalities at the 10–14-week scan.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:429–442
38. Nicolaides KH, Sebire NJ, Snijders R. The
11–14-week scan. The diagnosis of fetal
abnormalities. Parthenon, Carnforth, 1999
39. Sonek J, Cicero S, Neiger R, Nicolaides
K. Nasal bone development in prenatal
screening for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2006;195(5):1219–1230
40. Bernaschek G, Deutinger J. Current status
of vaginosonography: a world-wide inquiry.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:352–356
41. Timor-Tritsch I. Opinion: standardization
of ultrasonographic images: let's talk the
same language. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
1992;2(5):311–312
78

5
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
Normal fetal anatomy at 18–22 weeks
David A Nyberg Vivienne L Souter
ABSTRACT
A screening obstetric ultrasound during the second trimester has been widely
adopted around the world and can provide important information regarding the
fetus and pregnancy. The fetus can be examined quite literally from head to toe,
which has led to the concept of the fetal ‘anatomical survey’. A fetal anatomical
survey requires a systematic approach that should be performed in all secondtrimester fetuses, regardless of the indication for the ultrasound. Familiarity
with normal anatomy is essential to recognize deviations from normal or fetal
anomalies. Centres should attempt to exceed basic guidelines.
KEYWORDS
Fetal abnormalities, fetus, normal, normal anatomy, prenatal sonography.
INTRODUCTION
A screening obstetric ultrasound during the second trimester has been widely
adopted around the world. This can provide important information regarding
the pregnancy, including evaluation for placenta praevia, evaluation of the cervix and cervical incompetence and, most importantly, evaluation of the fetus.
The fetus can be examined quite literally from head to toe, which has led to the
concept of the fetal ‘anatomical survey’. Parents might even consider this their
baby's first physical examination. In the vast majority of cases the fetus appears
normal and parents can be reassured regarding the health of their baby. At the
same time, a systematic fetal survey can now detect the majority of fetal malformations.1 A second-trimester scan is also desired by most prospective parents
and has been found to be cost-effective, at least at centres that have reasonable
accuracy for detection of fetal anomalies.
2
79

✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
The timing of the second trimester ultrasound varies between centres. While later
scans permit improved anatomical detail and greater sensitivity for many structural
defects, earlier scans can both provide useful information earlier and also about the
risk of fetal chromosome abnormality. For this reason, fetal surveys may be performed earlier at 15–18 weeks, coinciding with the time of genetic amniocentesis or
second-trimester maternal serum screen. At our own centre, patients obtain a scan
at 15–18 weeks if they are considering genetic amniocentesis or at 18–22 weeks if
they are considered low risk. This approach supports other studies which suggest
that, at least among low-risk women, a later scan will provide more information and
is less likely to result in a repeat scan.3 Centres that perform a first-trimester (10–
14 weeks) ultrasound that includes nuchal translucency measurements and early
fetal evaluation will also usually obtain a later scan at 18–22 weeks.
SCAN GUIDELINES
Guidelines for a normal anatomical survey have been published by various institutions.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
anatomical structures beyond the basic set suggested by society guidelines. We
4,5
However, most centres now routinely include documentation of other
have further modified the guidelines to reflect the completeness of a fetal survey
performed at most obstetric centres (Box 5.1). Procedures that adhere to these
guidelines should result in detection of the majority of major detectable anomalies. Because most anomalies are sporadic and occur in otherwise low-risk women,
it is important that all scans performed during the second trimester include a
fetal survey as an essential part, regardless of the reason for performing the scan.
Detection of anomalies does not require a detailed understanding of pathology;
it only requires thorough familiarity with normal anatomy. Deviations from normal or suspected anomalies can then be referred to a high-risk centre for a more
detailed fetal ultrasound examination and clinical consultation.
NORMAL FETAL ANATOMY
BRAIN/CALVARIUM
Views of the brain should include three standard axial views: transthalamic,
transventricular and transcerebellar (Figs 5.1–5.4). These three views permit a
reliable prenatal diagnosis of nearly all significant intracranial anomalies as well
as providing important clues for the vast majority of spinal dysraphic defects
before the time of viability.
6–8,84
80
Transthalamic view
The transthalamic view (see Fig. 5.1) is the standard plane used for obtaining
biometric cranial measurements (biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumference). At this level, one can also visualize the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles
and the cavum septum pellucidum between the frontal horns. The cavum septum
pellucidum (CSP), and its posterior extension the cavum vergae, is a fluid-filled
midline structure located between the lateral ventricles. Sonographically, it is

✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
Box 5.1 Elements of fetal anatomical survey at 18–22 weeks
Head and Brain
Calvarium
Brain – documentation of thalami, hemispheres, lateral ventricles, cerebellum and
vermis which includes the following views:
Transthalamic
Transventricular
Transcerebellar
Face/Neck
Face (lips, mouth, nose, orbits and ears)
Neck (nuchal fold)
Spine
Longitudinal and transverse views
Thorax
Heart – documentation of venous–atrial, atrial–ventricular and ventricular–arterial
connections which may include the following views:
Four chamber
Right ventricular outflow
Left ventricular outflow
Aortic arch
Ductal arch
Lungs
Bony thorax
Abdomen
Major organs (stomach, liver, spleen, gallbladder)
Gut
Anterior abdominal wall
Genitourinary tract
Kidneys
Urinary bladder
Genitalia
Extremities, bony skeleton
Upper extremities including both hands
Lower extremities including both feet
Normal fetal anatomy at 18–22 weeks
Data from reference 4. Evaluation should also include estimation of dates (or evaluation of growth). This
should include, as a minimum, measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal
circumference and femur length (humerus length). Obstetric ultrasound should also include assessment
of the placenta, cervix, amniotic fluid and possible adnexa.
Adapted from Yoo et al.
44
usually identified as a fluid-filled structure anterior to the thalami on axial images.
It should not be mistaken for the third ventricle which is smaller and located
more posteriorly between the thalami. Presence of the CSP suggests proper formation of the midline cerebral structures.
85
When specifically sought, the CSP can be identified in most cases. However, it
may be difficult to visualize on standard views, especially before 20 weeks. Both the
CSP and corpus callosum can be better seen on transvaginal scans (see Fig. 5.2).9
The corpus callosum shows gradual enlargement during pregnancy, from nearly
81

✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
A
B
Fig. 5.1 Transthalamic view. Axial view through the mid head shows normal thalami (Th).
The cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) is a small midline fluid space anterior the thalami.
17 mm in length at 18 weeks' gestation to 44 mm at term. The ratio of the length of
the corpus callosum to the anteroposterior diameter of the brain remains relatively
constant from 20–21 weeks' gestation to term.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Transventricular view
The transventricular view is obtained at a plane just superior to the transthalamic
view (see Fig. 5.3). Demonstration of the lateral cerebral ventricles in this view is
essential for the early detection of hydrocephalus. Within the ventricular system
lies the echogenic choroid plexus, best seen filling the body of the lateral ventricle from medial to lateral wall, and extending into the atrium (or trigone). The
choroid plexus does not extend into the frontal horns, and they are identified as
Transvaginal scans show normal-appearing corpus callosum (CC) in (A) coronal and
82
Fig. 5.2
(B) sagittal planes. FH, frontal horns; CSP, cavum septum pellucidum.
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
