Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5786_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
31.08.2026
Размер:
39 Мб
Скачать
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
with dyspnoea, abdominal pain and neurological symptoms. The primary symp­tom is vaginal bleeding. Choriocarcinoma may be found after a molar preg­nancy, a miscarriage or after an apparently normal pregnancy. The sonographic appearance of a choriocarcinoma resembles that of an invasive mole. The pri­mary tumour of a choriocarcinoma in an apparently normal placenta is usually small, less than 8 mm. So far, such a primary tumour has not been described sonographically.
27

ECTOPIC PREGNANCY

A common cause for early pregnancy failure in the western world is ectopic pregnancy. The prevalence of this condition is nearly 2%, accounting for 9% of pregnancy-related deaths of reproductive-aged women in the first trimester in the USA.29 There are many risk factors, the highest risk being found in patients who have had tubal surgery including sterilization, previous ectopic pregnancy, in utero exposure to diethylstilboestrol, IUD and documented tubal pathology.
Early diagnosis of an ectopic pregnancy is important because it contributes to a decline in morbidity, maternal deaths and treatment costs. As the identification of an ectopic pregnancy can be difficult, the first step in ruling out ectopic pregnancy should be to identify intrauterine pregnancy which can virtually always be identi­fied after 5.5 weeks by transvaginal ultrasound. Quantitative hCG serum analysis is an important additional test, when an intrauterine pregnancy cannot be seen. Ectopic pregnancy should be assumed when the hCG serum test is above the dis­criminatory zone in which a pregnancy should always be detected by transvagi­nal sonography (TVS) (β-hCG concentrations =1500 IU/L).30 Sonographically, an extrauterine gestational sac surrounded by an echogenic ring consisting of the trophoblast at the implantation is usually seen (Fig. 4.18). Other ultrasound signs for ectopic pregnancy are any non-cystic extraovarian adnexal mass, complex cys­tic or solid masses and, of course, a living ectopic pregnancy, which is found in approximately 5–15% of cases. Viability of ectopic pregnancies can be evaluated by transvaginal Doppler ultrasound because of the good vascularization of the trophoblastic ring.
The scan for ectopic pregnancies must be performed thoroughly and system­atically. One must be aware of special ectopic locations such as interstitial preg­nancy, which occurs in 1–6% of all ectopic pregnancies,31 or cervical pregnancy, which accounts for only 0.15%.32 The ultrasound diagnosis of an interstitial preg­nancy is made when products of conception are visible in the upper lateral aspect of the uterus, outside the uterine cavity and at least partially surrounded by myo­metrium.31 In cervical pregnancies, the gestational sac is found below the internal os of the uterus. To miss the diagnosis of these two variants of ectopic pregnancy imposes extraordinary risks to affected women, because these conditions may lead to acute life-threatening bleeding, which may be difficult to treat. One must also be aware of the possibility of concomitant intrauterine and ectopic preg­nancies. The occurrence of heterotopic pregnancies is increased in pregnancies achieved by assisted fertilization.
30
Investigation of early pregnancy
73
✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
A
B
Uterus
Ovary
Ovary
Ectopic pregnancy
leftright
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Fig. 4.18 Ectopic pregnancy. (A) Transverse section through the female pelvis; ovary on the right side of the uterus. (B) Laterally from the right ovary an ectopic pregnancy with a living embryo can be seen. See also standardization, Fig. 4.21.
74
A review of six different diagnostic algorithms for ectopic pregnancy con­cluded that a combination of ultrasound and hCG resulted in the best outcomes. Ultrasound as the first step was the most efficient and accurate method of diag­nosing ectopic pregnancy.
29

EARLY ANOMALIES

High-frequency transvaginal transducers have made it possible to disclose struc­tural developmental disorders of the embryo (before 10 weeks) and the young fetus. An increasing number of studies, reviews and case reports describe ultra­sound detection of early anomalies.
Nuchal translucency (NT), which may be found at the early 11–13-week-scan, is a well-known transient marker for fetal disorders.38 Both the transabdominal and the transvaginal approach can be used. Though NT is seen in normal fetuses, it is not only highly associated with chromosomal aberrations, but it may also be found in fetuses with skeletal anomalies, neuromuscular disorders, rare genetic disorders, heart defects or infections.38 The likelihood for associated anoma­lies increases with the thickness of the oedema. Nicolaides and colleagues have described the criteria of NT measurements: CRL 45–83 mm, 11 weeks 0 days to 13 weeks 6 days, preferably but not necessarily TVS, and good sagittal section of the fetus with appropiate magnification. The maximum thickness of subcutane­ous translucency is measured by placing the calipers on the inner lines.
3337
38
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
The absence of nasal bone ossification at the end of the first trimester is another marker for possible abnormal development, namely trisomy 21. Evidence based on radiological, histomorphological and sonographic studies has shown that nasal bone abnormalities are significantly more common in trisomy 21 fetuses than in euploid fetuses.
39

STANDARDIZATION OF TRANSVAGINAL AND TRANSABDOMINAL IMAGING IN GYNAECOLOGY

In 1992, Timor-Tritsch discussed an inquiry performed by Bernaschek and Deutinger 40 that revealed a world-wide discord about the way TVS images were displayed.41 Timor-Tritsch's recommendation was: ‘Let's all talk the same lan­guage!’. To help us talk the same language, we should review some of the basic rules taught at medical school, rules that probably represent a world-wide standard.
When we examine a patient, we principally position ourselves on the patient's right side and face the patient. This is the starting point of every examination. When we look at the patient we see the patient's left shoulder on the right. We can imagine we are viewing a ‘screen’ with our own eyes. When gynaecologists perform an examination of the uterus and adnex, they will find the patient's left ovary/adnexa on the right side (of the screen/picture), and the patient's right ovary/adnexa on the left side.
Investigation of early pregnancy

IMAGING IN MEDICINE

Pictures of organs or parts of the body should present the normal anatomical relations as exactly as possible. The argument for displaying the TVS pictures on the monitor with the ‘footprint’ of the vaginal probe at the bottom of the screen close to the cervix, while the fundus of the uterus points towards the top of the screen, seems correct and self-explanatory.41 In essence, this would be the ‘natural’ way to display the uterus on the screen, at least through the eyes of a practising gynaecologist who performs a bimanual examination on a patient in the supine position. The cervix would be at the tip of the examining fingers and the fundus of the uterus further away, i.e. cephalad. An additional advantage of displaying the picture with the apex of the ‘pie’ pointing downward or upward would be the ability to tell instantly the difference between an image obtained by the transvaginal or transabdominal route: the apex of the ‘pie’ pointing to the bottom of the screen on the transvaginal picture and to the top of the screen on the transabdominal scan.
There are more arguments for this form of imaging. If we move the transab­dominal transducer from the midsagittal plane to the left or to the right, we will identify the ovaries lying close to and ‘below’ the iliac vessels. This is the normal relation: the ovary is in a mediodorsal position to the iliac vessels. In the TVS image display, this anatomical relation should be maintained.
For the transverse plane, the transducer is rotated 90 ° to the left, imaging the right adnexa on the left side of the picture and vice versa for the left adnexa.
75
✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
CaudalCranial
Ventral
Dorsal
LeftRight
Ventral/cranial
Dorsal/caudal
90
CaudalCranial
Ventral
Dorsal
Fig. 4.19 Transabdominal sonography (TAS) and transvaginal sonography (TVS) of the female pelvis; sagittal insonation angle.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
76
Fig. 4.20 Direction of the sagittal imaging sectors of TAS and TVS through the female pelvis. Note that the cranial part of the pelvis points to the left side, and the caudal part points to the right side. Imagine that the observer's position is on the right side of the patient.
Fig. 4.21 By turning the transducers 90˚, a transverse section of the pelvis is shown. Note that the right part of the pelvis is shown on the left side of the image, and the left part on the right side. Imagine that the observer looks at the patient's body from below.
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
By simply looking at the image, it should be easy to distinguish whether the scan was done by TVS or TAS. Further, it must be possible to correlate TVS and TAS images from the same patient. When TVS and TAS images are standardized as indicated above, it is easy to recognize a TAS (‘pie apex up’) from a TVS (‘pie apex down’). In the transverse plane we will expect to find the patient's left ovary on the right side of the image and in the sagittal plane we will expect to find the bladder on the right side. If the uterus is pointing towards the right in a sagittal plane it is anteflexion; if it is pointing to the left, it is retroversion – no further explanation needed.

References

Investigation of early pregnancy
1. Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the
medical causes of miscarriage. Baillière's Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;14(5):839–854
2. Blaas H-GK. Editorial: the examination
of the embryo and early fetus: how and by whom? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14(3):153–158
3. Takeuchi H. Transvaginal ultrasound in the
first trimester of pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 1992;29:381–384
4. Timor-Tritsch IE, Farine D, Rosen MG.
A close look at the embryonic development with the high frequency transvaginal transducer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;159:678–681
5. Timor-Tritsch IE, Peisner DB, Raju S.
Sonoembryology: an organ-oriented approach using a high-frequency vaginal probe. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:286–298
6. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the forebrain and midbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:183–192
7. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the hindbrain: a longitudinal ultrasound study from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:151–160
8. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Kiserud T, Hellevik
LR. Early development of the abdominal wall, stomach and heart from 7 to 12 weeks of gestation: a longitudinal ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6:240–249
9. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH, Bremnes JB.
Embryonic growth. A longitudinal biometric ultrasound study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;12(5):346–354
10. Zalen-Sprock R, Brons JTJ, Vugt J, Harten
H, Geijn H. Ultrasonographic and radiologic visualization of the developing embryonic skeleton. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;9:392–397
11. Robinson HP, Fleming JEE. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘crown-rump length’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:702–710
12. Reece EA, Scioscia AL, Green J, O'Connor TZ, Hobbins J. Embryonic trunk circumference: a new biometric parameter for estimation of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:713–715
13. Robinson HP, Shaw-Dunn J. Fetal heart rates as determined by sonar in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Cwlth 1973;80:805–809
14. Cyr DR, Mack LA, Schoenecker SA et al. Bowel migration in the normal fetus: ultrasound detection. Radiology 1986;161:119–121
15. Timor-Tritsch IE, Warren WB, Peisner DB, Pirrone E. First trimester midgut herniation: a high frequency transvaginal sonographic study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:466–476
16. O'Rahilly R, Müller F. Developmental stages in human embryos. Carnegie Institute Publications, Washington, DC
17. Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal sonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:824–829
18. Sepulveda W, Sebire NJ, Hughes K, Odibo A, Nicolaides KH. The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;7(6):421–423
19. Waard MW, Bonsel GJ, Ankum WM, Vos J, Bindels PJE. Threatened miscarriage in general practice: diagnostic value of history taking and physical examination. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52(483):825–829
20. Jauniaux E, Johns J, Burton G. The role of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing and
77
✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
investigating early pregnancy failure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:613–624
21. Falco P, Milano V, Pilu G et al. Sonography of pregnancies with first-trimester bleeding and a viable embryo: a study of prognostic indicators by logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;7:165–169
22. Makrydimas G, Sebire NJ, Lolis D, Vlassis N, Nicolaides KH. Fetal loss following ultrasound diagnosis of a live fetus at 6-10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:368–372
23. Jauniaux E, Kaminopetros P, El-Rafaey H. Early pregnancy loss. In: Rodeck J, Whittle M (eds) Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice. Harcourt Brace, London, 1999: 835–847
24. Tower C, Regan L. Intrauterine haematomas in a recurrent miscarriage population. Hum Reprod 2001;16(9):2005–2007
25. Schats R, Jansen CAM, Wladimiroff JW.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Abnormal embryonic heart rate pattern in early pregnancy associated with Down's syndrome. Hum Reprod 1990;5(7):877–879
26. Achiron R, Tadmor O, Mashiach S. Heart rate as a predictor of first-trimester spontaneous abortion after ultrasound­proven viability. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:330–334
27. Jauniaux E. Ultrasound diagnosis and follow-up of gestational trophoblastic disease. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:367–377
28. Fowler DJ, Lindsay I, Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ. Routine pre-evacuation ultrasound diagnosis of hydatidiform mole: experience of more than 1000 cases from a regional referral center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:56–60
29. Gracia C, Barnhart K. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: decision analysis comparing six strategies. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:464–470
30. Pisarska M, Carson S, Buster J. Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 1998;351(9109):1115–1120
31. Hafner T, Aslam N, Ross J, Zosmer N, Jurkovic D. The effectiveness of non-surgical
management of early interstitial pregnancy: a case report of ten cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:131–136
32. Jurkovic D, Hacket E, Campbell S. Diagnosis and treatment of early cervical pregnancy: a review and a report of two cases treated conservatively. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:373–380
33. Blaas H-G, Eik-Nes SH. First-trimester diagnosis of fetal malformations. In: Rodeck J, Whittle M (eds) Fetal medicine: basic science and clinical practice. Harcourt Brace, London, 1999: 581–597
34. Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Isaksen CV. The detection of spina bifida before 10 gestational weeks using 2D- and 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:25–29
35. Blaas H-GK, Eik-Nes SH, Vainio T, Isaksen CV. Alobar holoprosencephaly at 9 weeks gestational age visualized by two- and three­dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:62–65
36. Rottem S, Bronshtein M. Transvaginal sonographic diagnosis of congenital anomalies between 9 weeks and 16 weeks menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound 1990;18:307–314
37. Souka AP, Nikolaides KH. Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities at the 10–14-week scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:429–442
38. Nicolaides KH, Sebire NJ, Snijders R. The 11–14-week scan. The diagnosis of fetal abnormalities. Parthenon, Carnforth, 1999
39. Sonek J, Cicero S, Neiger R, Nicolaides K. Nasal bone development in prenatal screening for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195(5):1219–1230
40. Bernaschek G, Deutinger J. Current status of vaginosonography: a world-wide inquiry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:352–356
41. Timor-Tritsch I. Opinion: standardization of ultrasonographic images: let's talk the same language. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2(5):311–312
78
5
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩

Normal fetal anatomy at 18–22 weeks

David A Nyberg Vivienne L Souter
ABSTRACT
A screening obstetric ultrasound during the second trimester has been widely adopted around the world and can provide important information regarding the fetus and pregnancy. The fetus can be examined quite literally from head to toe, which has led to the concept of the fetal ‘anatomical survey’. A fetal anatomical survey requires a systematic approach that should be performed in all second­trimester fetuses, regardless of the indication for the ultrasound. Familiarity with normal anatomy is essential to recognize deviations from normal or fetal anomalies. Centres should attempt to exceed basic guidelines.
KEYWORDS
Fetal abnormalities, fetus, normal, normal anatomy, prenatal sonography.

INTRODUCTION

A screening obstetric ultrasound during the second trimester has been widely adopted around the world. This can provide important information regarding the pregnancy, including evaluation for placenta praevia, evaluation of the cer­vix and cervical incompetence and, most importantly, evaluation of the fetus. The fetus can be examined quite literally from head to toe, which has led to the concept of the fetal ‘anatomical survey’. Parents might even consider this their baby's first physical examination. In the vast majority of cases the fetus appears normal and parents can be reassured regarding the health of their baby. At the same time, a systematic fetal survey can now detect the majority of fetal mal­formations.1 A second-trimester scan is also desired by most prospective parents and has been found to be cost-effective, at least at centres that have reasonable accuracy for detection of fetal anomalies.
2
79
✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
The timing of the second trimester ultrasound varies between centres. While later scans permit improved anatomical detail and greater sensitivity for many structural defects, earlier scans can both provide useful information earlier and also about the risk of fetal chromosome abnormality. For this reason, fetal surveys may be per­formed earlier at 15–18 weeks, coinciding with the time of genetic amniocentesis or second-trimester maternal serum screen. At our own centre, patients obtain a scan at 15–18 weeks if they are considering genetic amniocentesis or at 18–22 weeks if they are considered low risk. This approach supports other studies which suggest that, at least among low-risk women, a later scan will provide more information and is less likely to result in a repeat scan.3 Centres that perform a first-trimester (10– 14 weeks) ultrasound that includes nuchal translucency measurements and early fetal evaluation will also usually obtain a later scan at 18–22 weeks.

SCAN GUIDELINES

Guidelines for a normal anatomical survey have been published by various insti­tutions.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
anatomical structures beyond the basic set suggested by society guidelines. We
4,5
However, most centres now routinely include documentation of other
have further modified the guidelines to reflect the completeness of a fetal survey performed at most obstetric centres (Box 5.1). Procedures that adhere to these guidelines should result in detection of the majority of major detectable anoma­lies. Because most anomalies are sporadic and occur in otherwise low-risk women, it is important that all scans performed during the second trimester include a fetal survey as an essential part, regardless of the reason for performing the scan. Detection of anomalies does not require a detailed understanding of pathology; it only requires thorough familiarity with normal anatomy. Deviations from nor­mal or suspected anomalies can then be referred to a high-risk centre for a more detailed fetal ultrasound examination and clinical consultation.

NORMAL FETAL ANATOMY

BRAIN/CALVARIUM

Views of the brain should include three standard axial views: transthalamic, transventricular and transcerebellar (Figs 5.1–5.4). These three views permit a reliable prenatal diagnosis of nearly all significant intracranial anomalies as well as providing important clues for the vast majority of spinal dysraphic defects before the time of viability.
6–8,84
80
Transthalamic view
The transthalamic view (see Fig. 5.1) is the standard plane used for obtaining biometric cranial measurements (biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumfer­ence). At this level, one can also visualize the frontal horns of the lateral ventricles and the cavum septum pellucidum between the frontal horns. The cavum septum pellucidum (CSP), and its posterior extension the cavum vergae, is a fluid-filled midline structure located between the lateral ventricles. Sonographically, it is
✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩ ✩
Box 5.1 Elements of fetal anatomical survey at 18–22 weeks
Head and Brain
Calvarium Brain – documentation of thalami, hemispheres, lateral ventricles, cerebellum and vermis which includes the following views:
Transthalamic Transventricular Transcerebellar
Face/Neck
Face (lips, mouth, nose, orbits and ears) Neck (nuchal fold)
Spine
Longitudinal and transverse views
Thorax
Heart – documentation of venous–atrial, atrial–ventricular and ventricular–arterial connections which may include the following views:
Four chamber Right ventricular outflow Left ventricular outflow Aortic arch Ductal arch
Lungs Bony thorax
Abdomen
Major organs (stomach, liver, spleen, gallbladder) Gut Anterior abdominal wall
Genitourinary tract
Kidneys Urinary bladder
Genitalia
Extremities, bony skeleton
Upper extremities including both hands Lower extremities including both feet
Normal fetal anatomy at 18–22 weeks
Data from reference 4. Evaluation should also include estimation of dates (or evaluation of growth). This should include, as a minimum, measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length (humerus length). Obstetric ultrasound should also include assessment of the placenta, cervix, amniotic fluid and possible adnexa. Adapted from Yoo et al.
44
usually identified as a fluid-filled structure anterior to the thalami on axial images. It should not be mistaken for the third ventricle which is smaller and located more posteriorly between the thalami. Presence of the CSP suggests proper for­mation of the midline cerebral structures.
85
When specifically sought, the CSP can be identified in most cases. However, it may be difficult to visualize on standard views, especially before 20 weeks. Both the CSP and corpus callosum can be better seen on transvaginal scans (see Fig. 5.2).9 The corpus callosum shows gradual enlargement during pregnancy, from nearly
81
✩ ✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩✩
A
B
Fig. 5.1 Transthalamic view. Axial view through the mid head shows normal thalami (Th). The cavum septum pellucidum (CSP) is a small midline fluid space anterior the thalami.
17 mm in length at 18 weeks' gestation to 44 mm at term. The ratio of the length of the corpus callosum to the anteroposterior diameter of the brain remains relatively constant from 20–21 weeks' gestation to term.
Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology
Transventricular view
The transventricular view is obtained at a plane just superior to the transthalamic view (see Fig. 5.3). Demonstration of the lateral cerebral ventricles in this view is essential for the early detection of hydrocephalus. Within the ventricular system lies the echogenic choroid plexus, best seen filling the body of the lateral ven­tricle from medial to lateral wall, and extending into the atrium (or trigone). The choroid plexus does not extend into the frontal horns, and they are identified as
Transvaginal scans show normal-appearing corpus callosum (CC) in (A) coronal and
82
Fig. 5.2
(B) sagittal planes. FH, frontal horns; CSP, cavum septum pellucidum.