Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5851_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
Approach toECG Interpretation inCritical Care
2
57
– Myocardial ischemia: It typically manifests as a horizontal or downward-sloping
ST-segment depression. It is usually seen during exercise or periods of increased myocardial demand and may be transient.
– Hypokalemia: This causes diffuse ST-segment depression, often with a charac-
teristic “sagging” appearance, T-wave attening, or inversion.
– Hypoxia: Decreased oxygen supply to the myocardium, as seen in respiratory
failure or severe anemia.
– Digitalis toxicity: Digitalis toxicity can cause down-sloping ST-segment depres-
sion, typically with associated T-wave attening or inversion. It may also mani­fest as a “scooped” appearance of the ST segment.
2.5.8.2 ST-Segment Elevation
This is diagnosed when the ST segment is observed to be elevated above the base­line (isoelectric line) by at least 0.5mm (or 0.05mV) in leads with predominantly positive QRS complexes or 1mm (or 0.1mV) in leads with predominantly negative QRS complexes [35]. Examples of causes of ST-segment elevation are the following:
– Acute myocardial infarction (STEMI): STEMI (Fig. 2.17) is characterized by
persistent ST-segment elevation (usually >1mm in two contiguous leads) along with pathological Q waves (indicating myocardial necrosis) and T-wave changes (often inversion or hyperacute T waves).
– Pericarditis: Pericarditis (Fig.2.12) typically presents with diffuse ST-segment
elevation across multiple leads, often with concave upward morphology. The elevation is usually widespread and does not localize to specic coronary artery distributions.
Fig. 2.17 Acute inferior STEMI Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
58
Fig. 2.18 Hypercalcemia, showing an ST-segment elevation with a scooped appearance. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
M. H. Vicco et al.
– Myocarditis: Myocarditis can present with ST-segment elevation, like acute
myocardial infarction. However, the elevation may be more diffuse and less pro­nounced compared to STEMI.ST-segment elevation may not meet the criteria for STEMI (>1mm in two contiguous leads) but can still be present, along with T-wave changes and sometimes pathological Q waves.
– Prinzmetal’s variant angina: Prinzmetal’s angina is characterized by transient
episodes of ST-segment elevation during angina attacks, typically occurring at rest and unrelated to exertion.
– Hypercalcemia: It can produce a wide range of ECG abnormalities, with shorten-
ing the c interval being the most common nding. However, a normal QTc inter­val is relatively common in mild-to-moderate hypercalcemia. ST-segment elevation mimicking acute myocardial infarction has been well described:
gment elevation has a scooped appearance and is usually followed by indis-
ST- se tinct or absent T waves (Fig.2.18). This false-positive ECG nding should be included in the differential diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, although it is not the most common manifestation of hypercalcemia. Additionally, sick sinus syn­drome and bradycardia have been reported in hypercalcemia.

2.5.9 T Waves

Normal T waves are typically asymmetric, with a gradual upslope and a more rapid downslope, resulting in a slightly rounded or dome-like appearance [35]. Normally, the duration ranges between 0.08 and 0.10seconds, and its amplitude varies but generally does not exceed 5mm in limb leads or 10 mm in precordial leads. The
2
proach toECG Interpretation inCritical Care
Ap
59
polarity of the T wave is positive in most leads but may be negative in leads where the electrical vector is directed away from the electrode, such as in the aVR lead.
Pathological T waves are often categorized based on their morphology and can be
broadly classied as peaked, attened, biphasic, or inverted. Peaked T waves may indicate hyperkalemia or acute myocardial infarction, while attened or inverted T waves may suggest myocardial ischemia, electrolyte disturbances, myocardial injury, or ventricular hypertrophy. Moreover, T-wave abnormalities can be transient or persistent, requiring careful evaluation to determine their clinical signicance.
2.5.9.1 Inverted T Wave
– Left ventricular hypertrophy: Inverted T waves may be seen in leads with pre-
dominantly negative QRS complexes (e.g., V1–V3). The presence of LVH crite­ria, such as increased voltage in the QRS complexes or repolarization abnormalities, supports the diagnosis.
– Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Inverted T waves, often deep and asymmetric,
may be present in leads facing the hypertrophied septum (e.g., V1–V3). Additional ndings may include left atrial enlargement, left ventricular outow tract obstruction, or dynamic left ventricular hypertrophy.
– Myocardial ischemia: Inverted T waves may appear in leads facing the ischemic
region. Additionally, ST-segment changes (depression or elevation) and Q waves may be present, depending on the severity and chronicity of the ischemia or infarction (Fig.2.19).
– Digitalis toxicity: Inverted T waves, often associated with ST-segment depres-
sion and a “scooped” appearance of the ST segment, may be present. Additional
Fig. 2.19 T-wave inversion and ST-segment depression in precordial leads in the context of acute anterior ischemia. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
60
Fig. 2.20 Pulmonary embolism. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
M. H. Vicco et al.
features of digitalis toxicity include bradyarrhythmias, AV block, or enhanced automaticity.
– Cerebrovascular events: Inverted T waves may occur as a secondary manifesta-
tion of neurogenic cardiac effects such as acute stroke or transient ischemic attack affecting the brain’s autonomic control centers. Diagnosis involves corre­lating ECG ndings with neurological symptoms and imaging studies to conrm the cerebrovascular event.
– Acute pulmonary embolism: Inverted T waves (Fig.2.20) in leads reecting right
ventricular involvement (e.g., V1–V4) may be observed. Additional ECG ndings may include right-axis deviation, S1Q3T3 pattern, or signs of right heart strain (e.g., T-wave inversion in leads V1–V3 with simultaneous ST elevation in lead III).
2.5.9.2 Flattened T Wave
– Hypokalemia: Flattened T waves are observed, and additional ndings that may
be accompanying are ST-segment depression and prominent U waves (Fig.2.21). The diagnosis is conrmed by correlating ECG ndings with serum potas­sium levels.
– Hypocalcemia (Fig.2.22): Flattened T waves may be present on the ECG, often
accompanied by prolonged QT intervals.
– Hypothermia: Flattened T waves may be seen on the ECG, along with other signs
of hypothermia such as bradycardia and Osborn (J) waves.
– Acute myocardial ischemia/infarction: Flattened T waves may be observed in
leads facing the ischemic region, along with other signs of ischemia such as ST­segment changes and chest pain.
Approach toECG Interpretation inCritical Care
2
Fig. 2.21 Hypokalemia. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL. ECG Wave­Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
61
Fig. 2.22 Hypocalcemia. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave­Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.harvard.edu
2.5.9.3 Peaked T Wave
– Hyperkalemia (Fig.2.23): Peaked T waves may be observed on the ECG, typi-
cally with a narrow base and tall amplitude. Associated ndings may include widened QRS complexes, prolonged PR intervals, and attened P waves.
– Early repolarization: Peaked T waves with a characteristic “tombstone” appear-
ance may be present on the ECG, particularly in precordial leads (V2–V5).
– Acute myocardial ischemia/infarction: Peaked T waves may be observed in leads
facing the ischemic region, typically in the early stages of myocardial ischemia. Associated ndings may include ST-segment elevation and chest pain.
62
Fig. 2.23 Hyperkalemia, peaked T waves. Nathanson LA, McClennen S, Safran C, Goldberger AL.ECG Wave-Maven: Self-Assessment Program for Students and Clinicians. http://ecg.bidmc.
harvard.edu
M. H. Vicco et al.
– Hyperacute phase of myocardial infarction: Peaked T waves may be present on
the ECG, often with concomitant ST-segment elevation. The T waves may ini­tially appear tall and narrow before progressing to broader and symmetri­cally peaked.
– BBB: Peaked T waves may occur as secondary repolarization changes due to
altered ventricular activation.
– Acute intracranial events: diagnosis: Peaked T waves may occur as a secondary
manifestation of neurogenic cardiac effects.
2.6 ECG Patterns Related toDrugs
In the critical care unit, certain ECG patterns may be due to drugs and inuenced by various factors including comorbidities, critical illness, pharmacological interac­tions, and drug toxicity [22]. Pharmacists play a crucial role in understanding poten­tial drug effects, thereby contributing to improving clinical outcomes and mitigating adverse events [2325].
The most important ECG patterns with clinical relevance for pharmacists are
discussed below.
2.6.1 Patterns Associated withSpecic Drugs or Toxics
Tricyclic antidepressants: These drugs can block fast sodium channels, pro-
longing QRS duration and delaying conduction. They can produce sinus tachy­cardia due to anticholinergic and alpha-1 antagonism and interfere with
2
Approach toECG Interpretation inCritical Care
63
ventricular repolarization, leading to QT prolongation. A characteristic ECG nding is an R wave in aVR.
Antipsychotics: These medications may induce bradycardia, sinus tachycardia,
ventricular arrhythmias, or prolongation of QRS and QTc intervals.
Digoxin: Arrhythmogenic effects of digoxin include triggered activity, automa-
tism enhancement, and vagal tone augmentation, manifesting as PR interval pro­longation, “reverse tick” or “Salvador Dali sagging” ST-segment depression, and shortened T-wave amplitude. Toxicity may be suspected with ventricular autom­atism, junctional tachycardia, atrial brillation, atrial tachycardia, AV block, ventricular brillation, and other arrhythmias.
Ethanol: Ethanol toxicity increases sympathetic tone, impairs repolarization,
and affects QTc duration, leading to sinus tachycardia, atrial tachycardia, atrial brillation, ventricular tachycardia, and prolongation of PR, QRS, and QTc intervals [22].
Cocaine: Cocaine affects sodium, calcium, and potassium channels and exerts
adrenergic agonism [22]. This can potentially cause sinus tachycardia, ventricu­lar tachycardia, QTc prolongation, TdP, idioventricular rhythms, and asystole.
Organophosphates: Toxicity is associated with sinus tachycardia/bradycardia,
intraventricular conduction delays, variable AV blocks, and prolongation of PR, QRS, and QTc intervals.
2.6.2 Specic Wave or Interval Impairments
P wave: Prolongation may result from sodium and potassium channel blockade.
PR interval: Prolongation may occur due to vagal stimulation, beta-blockers,
calcium channel antagonists, adenosine, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
QRS complex: Prolongation can be induced by sodium channel blockers.
QT
interval: Digoxin may shorten QT duration, while acetylcholinesterase
inhibitors and several other drugs can prolong it.

References

1. Jackevicius C. Pharmacist participation in CPR needs resuscitation. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68(4):275–6.
2. Kronick SL, Kurz MC, Lin S, etal. Part 4: Systems of care and continuous quality improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S397–413.
3. Bayés de Luna A, Fiol-Sala M, Bayés-Genís A, Baranchuk A.Clinical electrocardiography: a textbook. 5th ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2021. ISBN: 1119536456.
4. Bayés de Luna A, Baranchuk A. Clinical arrhythmology. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2017. ISBN: 1119212758.
5. Baranchuk A. Atlas of advanced electrocardiogram interpretation. London: REMEDICA;
2013. www.ECGAtlas.com.
64
6. Kotsialou Z, Makris N, Gall S. Fundamentals of the electrocardiogram and common cardiac arrhythmias. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med. 2024;25:219–22.
7. Rautaharju PM, Surawicz B, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part IV: the ST segment, T and U waves, and the QT interval: a scientic statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation. 2009;119(10):e241–50.
8.
El-Sherif N, Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41(4):414–21.
9.
Xing L implantable loop recorder: insights from the LOOP Study. Europace. 2023;25(5):euad014.
10.
Kaak 2012;72(12):1617–30.
11.
Johner N, Namdar M, Shah DC. Electrophysiol. 2025.
12. Liwanag M, Willoughby C. Atrial Tachycardia. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
wer DA, etal. Cardiovascular complications of interatrial conduction block: JACC state-of-
13.
Po the-art re
14.
Escalante Perez S, et común del síndrome de Bayés. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2022;92(4):553–5.
15.
Nedios S, et tematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2024;26(Supplement_1):euae102.656.
16.
De Luna interatrial block. Eur Cardiol. 2015;10(1):54.
avone C, Pelargonio G. Reversible causes of atrioventricular block. Cardiol Clin.
17.
P 2023;41(3):411–8.
18.
Chen L lenges, and future research—a consensus document endorsed by the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(4):e010435.
19.
Gupta S, Khakh P tive reasoning: two cornerstones of electrocardiogram teaching. Can J Cardiol. 2024. S0828-282X(24)00300-3.
20.
Nadeau-Routhier C, Baranchuk University Apple Books; 2016.
21.
wicz B, Knilans T.Chou’s electrocardiography in clinical practice: adult and pediatric. 6th
Sura ed. Saunders Elsevier; 2008. ISBN: 1416037748
22.
isdale JE, Chung MK, Campbell KB, etal. Drug-induced arrhythmias: a scientic statement
T from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(15):e214–33.
23.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Preventing medication errors during codes. [Internet].
Available from: https://www.ismp.org/resources/preventing-
24.
Lipshutz in U.S. hospitals: direct and collateral damage. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34(1):46–56.
25.
Pozzolini Electrophysiol Clin. 2019;11(2):375–90.
Turitto G, Boutjdir M. Acquired long QT syndrome and torsade de pointes.
Y, et al. Electrocardiographic markers of subclinical atrial brillation detected by
eh Y, Overholser BR, Lopshire JC, et al. Drug-induced atrial brillation. Drugs.
Typical Atrial Flutter: A Practical Review. J Cardiovasc
view. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(12):1199–211.
al. Bloqueo interauricular avanzado atípico: una presentación poco
al. P-wave duration and interatrial block as predictors of ischemic stroke: a sys-
AB, Massó-Van Roessel A, Robledo LAE.The diagnosis and clinical implications of
Y, et al. P wave parameters and indices: a critical appraisal of clinical utility, chal-
, Miranda-Arboleda AF, et al. Pattern recognition and inductive-deduc-
A. Electrocardiography in practice: what to do? Queens
medication- errors- during- codes.
AK, Morloc LL, Shore AD, etal. Medication errors associated with code situations
A, Rio T, Padeletti M, etal. Complex arrhythmias due to reversible causes. Card
M. H. Vicco et al.

Further Reading

Zipes DP, Calkins H, Daubert JP, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS advanced training statement on clinical
cardiac electrophysiology (a revision of the ACC/AHA 2006 update of the clinical competence statement on invasive electrophysiology studies, catheter ablation, and cardioversion) Heart Rhythm. 2015;2016;13(1):e3–e37.
Chapter 3
The Role of Chest Radiography in the Critical Care Unit
FabioMacori

3.1 Introduction

Physical examination of patients can be challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) due to the complexity of medical conditions and the devices often used to support life, and this is even more difcult when the patient is intubated. Portable chest X-rays are often used as an adjunct to the physical examination (Fig.3.1a). Although it has some limitations in technical diagnostic capabilities, CXR is readily available and inexpensive and plays an important role in the daily evaluation of critically ill patients. Effective communication between radiologists and clinicians is essential to improve interpretation and ensure that quality care is provided to these patients.
It is recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines that portable chest radiography should be used for patients who have cardiopulmonary symptoms following cardiac or thoracic surgery, those who suffer from trauma, patients on monitoring and life support devices, and critically ill patients [1]. There are no strict guidelines dictating the frequency of chest radiography for ICU patients. However, several studies assessing the benet of daily chest radiography in the ICU have been performed with varied ndings. Patients who have acute cardiopulmo­nary problems are recommended to undergo daily chest radiography by the ACR.Chest radiographs should also be obtained immediately after the placement of endotracheal tubes, nasogastric tubes, vascular catheters, and chest tubes. Follow-up is necessary when the tube or catheter position is suspected to have changed or when otherwise clinically indicated. In the ICU, there are inherent challenges in chest radiography, which limit diagnostic accuracy. Many patients are unable to
F. Macori (*) Ospedale Santo Spirito Rome, Rome, RM, Italy e-mail: fabio@macori.eu
Switzerland AG 2025 Y. Alzaidi, M. A. Gebily (eds.), The Pharmacist’s Expanded Role in Critical Care Medicine, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77335-8_3
65© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
66
F. Macori
a b
Fig. 3.1 Normal AP chest (a) and PA (b) for comparison
cooperate with the examination, which makes it difcult to obtain optimal upright (posterior–anterior) positioning (Fig.3.1b). Radiographs are usually obtained in a semi-upright or supine anteroposterior (AP) position, and a lateral radiograph is often impractical. External monitoring devices, overlying tubes, and electrocardio­graphic leads may obscure underlying disease, mimic radiographic pathology, and create ambiguity regarding the positioning of other support equipment.
It is important to understand that the chest examination can vary depending on whether the patient is lying down or standing up. When a patient is lying down for an AP lm, the cardiovascular structures may appear larger than they are, leading to a misdiagnosis of vascular cephalization. The vascular pedicle may also appear more prominent, which could be mistaken for congestive heart failure [2].
When interpreting chest radiographs of patients in intensive care units (ICUs), it is crucial to follow a systematic approach [3, 4]:
– Ev
aluate the position of all catheters and support devices.
– Check the patient’
s cardiovascular status.
– Search for abnormally increased lung opacication areas, which may indicate
pneumonia or atelectasis.
– Assess the lm for the amount and distrib – Observ
e for any abnormal air collections, including pneumothorax, subcutane-
ution of pleural uid.
ous emphysema, pneumomediastinum, or pneumopericardium.
This systematic approach can help ensure accurate interpretation of chest radio­graphs in ICU patients.