Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5851_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
302
Table 11.2 Intravenous diuretics
Drug Dose Onset of action
Loop diuretics
Bumetanide 1mg IV load, then 0.5–2mg/h infusion 5min Furosemide 40mg IV load, then 10–40mg/h infusion 5min Torsemide 20mg IV load, then 5–20mg/h infusion 10min
Thiazide diuretics
Chlorothiazide 500mg—1000mg IV 15min
C. E. Kulig
Table 11.3
Equivalent doses
Furosemide 40mg PO Furosemide 20mg IV Torsemide 20mg PO/IV Bumetanide 1mg PO/IV
valent doses of diuretics
Equi
11.8.2 Reassessing Diuresis andAdding Thiazides
If there is no response or the response is suboptimal, it is recommended to double the dose of loop diuretic at 2-h intervals as needed until the maximum recommended dose is reached [2]. For context, a furosemide bolus of up to 160–200mg may be given. Higher doses of loop diuretics should be avoided due to the very real risk of ototoxicity [2].
It is important to note that in patients with renal insufciency, higher doses of loop diuretics may be required as less of the medication gets to the site of action in the loop of Henle [2].
If diuretic resistance remains an issue despite escalating doses, thiazide diuretics may be added on in combination to the existing loop diuretics [2]. These diuretics work distal to the loop of Henle where additional sodium and water reabsorption can take place, so by inhibiting this later step, the body does not have that opportu­nity and more water is excreted. This recommendation is supported by the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines as well [2]. Recently, data looking at the effect of oral vs. IV adjuncts to loop diuretics in those with ADHF found no difference in weight loss between oral metolazone and IV chlorothiazide [6].
11.8.3 Side Effects ofLoop Diuretics
Whenever a patient is undergoing diuresis, it is imperative that laboratory evalua­tion is conducted routinely, with particular attention to electrolytes and renal func­tion. The most commonly seen electrolyte abnormalities with aggressive diuresis are hypokalemia and hyponatremia. Diuretics can also cause acute kidney injury,
11 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
and so blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (SCr), and overall urine output should be assessed daily.
303
11.8.4 Adjuncts toLoop Diuretics
Though loop diuretics are the mainstay of diuresis, diuretic resistance can often be an issue, and adjunct agents can be considered. As mentioned previously, the addi­tion of thiazide diuretics in addition to loop diuretics is commonly used, and guide­line endorsed [2].
If cardiac output and perfusion are an issue, diuresis may be augmented by the use of inotropes [2]. Inotropes increase the force of contraction of the cardiac mus­cle and can increase perfusion, thus getting more blood to the kidneys and aiding in diuresis. Other considerations may include plasma ultraltration, aquapheresis, or renal dose dopamine [2]. Since the publication of the guidelines, new studies have also been published investigating the role of SGLT2-is or acetazolamide in these patients [7, 8].
11.8.5 Clinical Pearls Associated withDiuresis
11.8.5.1 Clinical Pearl #1: Always Look at theWhole I/Os Picture
It is a common scenario—you might be on rounds, and you nd out that your patient has had “poor” diuresis overnight and is only net negative 250mL.
Before you go increasing their diuretic regimen, it is important to get the whole picture, instead of being reactive to a suboptimal net negative number.
Ask Yourself the Following Questions
We know that the patient was only net negative 250mL.But what were the ins and what were the outs?
For example, it is very possible that the patient had great diuresis, with an impres­sive urine output, but is getting a lot of uids in. Is the patient volume restricted? How much uid are they getting through their medications? Is it possible to concen­trate any of the medications or switch from IV to oral? Is this truly a diuresis issue
or is it an intake issue?
Let Us Solidify with a Case
Patient A is net positive 103 mL (not including insensible losses) in the past 24h. The team would like to increase their diuretic regimen, but you rst look at their I/ Os. Table11.4 shows their I/Os in the past 24h. For reference, Patient A weighs 92kg.
The rst thing to assess is urine output for your given patient. A good rule of thumb is to look at 24-h output and translate it in terms of mL/kg/h.
304
Table 11.4 I/Os
Outs Total: 2050mL
Urine output (24h) 2050mL
Ins
Oral intake (24h) 946mL Medication A (24h) 432mL Medication B (24h) 150mL Medication C (24h) 250mL Medication D (24h) 250mL Medication E (24h) 125mL
Net (24h) +103mL
C. E. Kulig
In this patient—>2050mL total/92kg/24h=0.93mL/kg/h.
A urine output of >0.5/mL/kg/h is generally considered “good,” with values closer to 1 or above being excellent. In this case, the patient appears to be having adequate diuresis on their current regimen.
But why is the patient still net positive? The answer lies in the amount of volume the patient is getting through medications and oral intake. Ensure that the patient is on a volume-restricted diet. Next, assess the indications and concentrations of all medications the patient is getting.
Do they truly need every IV medication? Is there an appropriate indication? Or can we discontinue any IV medications in the interim?
Are you able to concentrate any of the current medications? Check with your hospital IV room. Keep in mind that if concentrating any IV medications, make sure that they are still compatible to run in the type of line that the patient has (e.g., if currently running through a peripheral line, is a higher concentration still compati­ble with a peripheral line? Or would a central line be required?). These are all con­siderations to make.
11.8.5.2
Clinical P
earl #2: Keep inMind That It Is Possible toBeVolume
Overloaded asaWhole, But Still BeIntravascularly Dry
Another common scenario in these patients: they have a day or two of fantastic diuresis, and then all of a sudden, urine output drops and serum creatinine and BUN rise. What is going on here? Should we increase the diuretic regimen?
It is important to understand and be aware of the concept that even though a patient still has volume overload—they still have pitting edema, are above their euvolemic weight, etc.,—they can still be intravascularly dry.
This can happen if we are diuresing too aggressively, too quickly. When patients diurese their excess volume, volume from the “third space” such as the tissues slowly gets pulled back into the vasculature and into blood volume where it can be
11 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
305
diuresed out. However, if we are too aggressive with our diuretic regimen, what can happen is that we diurese these patients too quickly and do not allow enough time for volume in the third space to reenter the vasculature. This can lead to decreased blood volume, hypotension, and acute kidney injury.
In this case, you may see soft blood pressures, an increase in SCr and BUN (with a BUN:SCr ratio>20), and, in the days/hours preceding, a very high urine output (in this case, too high!).
The last thing we would want to do in this scenario is escalate the diuretics. Instead, in this case, you would want to slow down the diuresing process, allowing time for that volume to reenter the vasculature. The solution here would be to increase the frequency and possibly decrease the dose of diuretics.
Remember that each patient has their own unique diuretic threshold at which lower doses will not produce adequate diuresis. In these patients who are already on their personal lowest dose, increasing the frequency would be effective at slowing net diuresis.

11.9 Intravenous Vasodilators

Depending on a patient’s hemodynamics, intravenous vasodilators can be consid­ered; however, the role for directed vasodilators in ADHF is still unclear and does not affect outcomes in ADHF [2]. Vasodilators that cause venodilation and decrease preload may target pulmonary congestion and help more acutely with symptoms such as dyspnea while waiting for signicant diuresis [2].
Intravenous nitroglycerin and nitroprusside are commonly utilized in ADHF (Table11.5).
Nitroglycerin can be considered in those with hypertension, signicant mitral regurgitation, or coronary ischemia.
Nitroprusside has the ability to cause potent blood pressure reduction, and so invasive hemodynamic monitoring (such as with an arterial line) is often required and used in an intensive care setting only. It can be considered in those with hyper­tension or severe mitral valve regurgitation complicating left ventricle dysfunction.
An issue with both nitroglycerin and nitroprusside is that tachyphylaxis can occur within a period of 24h, and 1in 5 patients may be resistant even at high doses.
Nitroprusside has an additional concern of thiocyanate and cyanide toxicity, especially in those with renal or hepatic disease and so caution should be taken in these patients.
Importantly, there is no data suggesting that IV vasodilators improve outcomes in these patients; therefore, their use is limited to relieving dyspnea in those with intact or high blood pressure [2].
306
Table 11.5 IV vasodilator comparison in ADHF
IV nitroglycerin IV sodium nitroprusside
Clinical effect
Dosing Initial: 5–10mcg/min; titrate as
Adverse effects
Clinical pearls
Venous dilation>>arterial dilation; arterial dilation can be seen at high doses Has more preload reduction than afterload reduction
needed based on response and tolerability in increments of 5–10mcg/min every 3–5min up to 200mcg/min
Hypotension, tachyphylaxis (within 24–48h of continuous infusion), headache, reex tachycardia
Duration of therapy is usually short term due to tachyphylaxis
C. E. Kulig
Potent venous and arterial dilator=potent preload and afterload reduction
Initial: 0.1–0.3mcg/kg/min; titrate as needed every 5–15min to achieve desired hemodynamic effect; usual dosage range: 1–3mcg/kg/min; maximum dose: 5mcg/kg/ min for an 80kg patient
Hypotension (more potent than seen with nitroglycerin), tachyphylaxis, reex tachycardia, cyanide toxicity
Caution in renal dysfunction—Can accumulate. Patients with renal impairment are at higher risk of cyanide toxicity Invasive monitoring generally required due to risk of hypotension (potent afterload reducer) May be particularly useful in an ADHF patient with HFrEF and dyspnea who is hemodynamically stable due to afterload reduction Duration of therapy is usually short term due to tachyphylaxis and the risk of cyanide toxicity

11.10 Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock has a high mortality rate and is characterized by low cardiac output and hypotension.
In those who have progressed from ADHF to cardiogenic shock, intravenous inotropic support should be utilized to preserve end-organ function and maintain perfusion [2].
Despite their common use, there are few prospective trials or randomized con­trolled evidence to guide their use. Additionally, there is also a lack of robust data to guide the choice of one agent over another; factors such as blood pressure and pres­ence of concomitant arrhythmia tend to guide agent selection [2].
Although all agents that have beta-1 agonism can be considered inotropes, in the context of heart failure, generally the “true” inotrope agents include milrinone and dobutamine (Table11.6).
Key factors to consider between the agents are their effects on blood pressure and their route of elimination. Milrinone is renally excreted and can accumulate in those with renal failure. Table11.6 reviews key differences between these agents.
11 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Table 11.6 Inotrope comparison in ADHF
IV dobutamine IV milrinone
Mechanism of action
Renally cleared/ renal dose adjustment
Side effects Tachyarrhythmias Tachyarrhythmias and hypotension Effect on cardiac
output Effect on SVR Minimal Decrease Clinical pearls Do not co-administer with beta-
Beta-1 agonist PDE-3 inhibitor
No Yes
Increase Increase
Caution in renal dysfunction as
ers as mechanisms of action
block cancel each other out
accumulation and prolonged hypotension can occur
307

11.10.1 Inotrope Clinical Pearl

Oftentimes, patients in ADHF may require vasopressors in addition to inotropes due to hypotension. A commonly seen scenario is a patient with ADHF in acute kidney injury on milrinone who has become hypotensive and was started on a vasopressor such as norepinephrine to keep mean arterial pressures (MAP) up. Because milri­none can cause hypotension and is renally eliminated, it can accumulate in those with renal dysfunction. Oftentimes, this accumulation can be part of the reason why hypotension occurs. Instead of relying on the addition of vasopressors which can increase afterload making it harder for a struggling HFrEF heart to push blood out, switching from milrinone to dobutamine may eliminate the need for pressors.
11.11 Management ofPatients withADHF andAtrial
Fibrillation (AF)
As heart failure progresses and the heart continues to remodel, arrhythmias can become increasingly prominent. Chronic atrial brillation can become increasingly common in these patients as these structural changes occur. However, even in those without chronic AF and mild structural changes, ADHF may precipitate acute epi­sodes of AF due to volume overload. As a patient becomes volume overloaded, the volume of blood that the left atrium needs to handle increases, and may cause stretch­ing of the atrial wall, thus precipitating acute atrial brillation. In this patient, the need for diuresis is the underlying treatment of the acute atrial brillation episode.
In general, cardioversion should be considered in those with new-onset atrial brillation and in those with hemodynamic instability.
308
However, in patients with long-standing heart failure and chronic atrial brilla­tion, cardiac structural changes are advanced and the chance of meaningful and successful rhythm control is oftentimes low; oftentimes, these patients are best man­aged with rate control strategies such as beta-blockers and/or digoxin. Keep in mind that any medications such as non-DHP calcium channel blockers should be avoided in those with systolic heart failure due to their negative inotropic properties [2].
Other precipitating causes for atrial brillation should also be investigated such as hormonal (e.g., hyperthyroidism), toxicologic, acute infection, or other medica­tions (e.g., inotropes) [2].
C. E. Kulig

11.12 Digoxin

11.12.1 The Role ofDigoxin
The role of digoxin in heart failure is somewhat controversial, as there is conicting data on whether or not it benets patients with heart failure, and it is not included in the “pillars” of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) management for these patients [2]. However, digoxin is often considered as a rate control agent, especially in those in the intensive care setting who cannot tolerate the potential blood pressure­lowering effects of other rate control agents, such as beta-blockers, and who are not candidates for non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (e.g., those with HFrEF).
Digoxin can be theoretically benecial to patients with heart failure given its positive inotropic properties and has two main mechanisms of action. For rate con­trol, digoxin has an indirect effect on both the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes by stimulating the vagus nerve and vagal tone, thus decreasing the heart rate.
11.12.2 Mechanism ofAction
Digoxin exerts its positive inotropic activity indirectly by inhibiting the Na+/K+ ATPase pump on the surface of the myocytes. To truly understand its action, you must rst understand the function of two key pumps on the surface of the myocytes.
The Na+/K+ ATPase is present on the surface of myocytes (Fig.11.4). As the name “ATPase” suggests, this pump requires energy (in the form of ATP) to actively pump ions across its channel. In other words, this pump must move ions against a concentration gradient.
At baseline, there is a high level of sodium extracellularly (aka outside the cells) and a high level of potassium intracellularly (within the cells) (this is why if blood samples are shaken or mishandled and the red blood cells lyse, you can end up with false hyperkalemia).
The Na+/K+ ATPase pumps 3Na+ out of the cell for every 2K+ it pumps into the cell, thus leaving the cellular membrane with a net negative charge.
11 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
309
Fig. 11.4 Digoxin’s mechanism of action
310
Meanwhile, there is also a Na+/Ca+2 exchanger pump located on the surface of these cells. This pump is not an ATPase and therefore does not require energy to work. In other words, this pump works with the concentration gradient and pumps Ca+2 out of the cell in exchange for Na+ based on the concentration gradient.
When digoxin inhibits the Na+/K+ ATPase, the pump no longer pumps Na+ out of the cell—thus, intracellular concentrations of sodium increase.
As mentioned above, usually the Na+/Ca+2 exchanger pumps Ca+2 out of cell and Na+ in to the cell with the concentration gradient—in other words, when intra­cellular Na+ levels are high, this pump will become less active, and as a result, intracellular calcium concentrations will increase.
This is how digoxin can exert a positive inotropic effect and increase force of contraction. By inhibiting the Na+/K+ ATPase, intracellular calcium levels rise indirectly causing a higher force of contraction.
C. E. Kulig

11.12.3 Loading Dose

A loading dose can be considered for digoxin for the management of atrial brilla­tion in patients with heart failure. It should be noted that loads are generally not given in heart failure patients in the absence of atrial brillation. Dosing varies but is often given intravenously at a dose of 0.25–0.5mg over several minutes. Repeat doses of 0.25mg IV may be given every 6h, not to exceed 1.5 mg within 24 h (though often in practice 1mg is used as the cap).

11.12.4 Maintenance Dosing

After initial loading, maintenance dosing is initiated. Oral doses range from
62.5mcg to 250mcg daily; however, renal function must be considered when select­ing doses as digoxin is renally cleared and is a narrow therapeutic index drug. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or acute kidney injury (AKI), mainte­nance doses should be decreased. Likewise, if a patient has been on digoxin prior to admission and presents in AKI, maintenance doses should still be adjusted or even stopped depending on the degree of AKI.As with other medications in the critically ill, oftentimes urine output may be the best marker of real-time kidney function.

11.12.5 Monitoring

As mentioned above, digoxin is a narrow therapeutic index drug—this means that small differences in dose or blood concentrations may lead to either drug failures (subtherapeutic) or toxicities (supratherapeutic).
11 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
Digoxin levels should be taken as troughs, ideally immediately prior to the next dose; however, levels at least 6h after an oral dose can be considered acceptable. Prior to 6h after dosing, digoxin is still undergoing redistribution into target tissues (e.g., it will likely be falsely high). It is important to note that in patients with heart failure as a comorbidity, goal digoxin levels are 0.5–0.9ng/mL, which are signicantly lower than goal ranges for patients without heart failure (e.g., 0.8–2.0ng/mL) [2].
311
11.12.6 When toGet aLevel?
The half-life of digoxin is fairly long, 36–48h in adults with healthy renal function, and can be as high as 3.5–5days in those with renal impairment. Because it takes four to ve half-lives for a drug to reach steady state, this means that digoxin levels will not represent steady-state levels for a minimum of 6days. Early levels can be considered if toxicity is expected but, in general, will be falsely low if taken prior unless loading doses have been given recently.

11.12.7 Distribution

Digoxin primarily distributes into the heart, liver, kidneys, and skeletal muscle. Therefore, caution should be taken in giving high doses to obese patients, and digoxin does not distribute extensively into fat. Patients with extremes of skeletal muscle (e.g., elderly malnourished patients vs. bodybuilders) may require differ­ent doses.

11.12.8 Drug-Drug Interactions

Digoxin has multiple drug-drug interactions and is a substrate of p-glycoprotein. Always assess a patient’s prole for drug-drug interactions when starting digoxin or when starting new medications.

11.12.9 Digoxin Toxicity

Aside from renal function, potassium levels are important to monitor during digoxin therapy. Hypokalemia may predispose a patient to digoxin toxicity; once digoxin toxicity occurs, hyperkalemia may occur. Other signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity include bradycardia, GI upset and diarrhea (these are the most common symptoms), visual disturbances (yellow-green disturbances), and syncope.