Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5851_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
476
M. Trammel et al.
Additionally, metabolism can occur by hepatic conjugation and mitochondrial β-oxidation. Common inducers that increase clearance and decrease steady-state concentrations include phenobarbital (PHB), phenytoin (PHT), primidone, carbam­azepine (CBZ), and topiramate (TPM). Inhibitors of metabolism that slow clearance and increase the steady-state concentrations of ASMs include valproic acid (VPA) and non-ASMs such as omeprazole, verapamil, macrolide antibiotics, paroxetine, ketoconazole, and sulfamethoxazole [20]. Of ASMs, levetiracetam (LEV) has the fewest DDIs.
ASM elimination, expressed as the biological half-life, is the time required for the drug’s serum concentration to decrease by 50% after absorption and distribu­tion. Half-life is commonly most affected by renal function, and dose adjustment is often necessary with kidney impairment and renal replacement therapy. Metabolism and clearance can be dependent on concomitant medications, hepatic function, and, as is the case of PHT, nonlinearity at baseline.
Additionally, there are patient factors that may play a role in the pharmacokinet­ics of medications. The pharmacist considers several patient-specic issues when choosing medications, routes of administration, and clearance. These include changes in drug metabolism and clearance in the setting of preexisting or evolving kidney injury or hepatic failure, shock, hypotension, hyperthermia, or pregnancy; gastrointestinal absorption and gut motility; and changes in nutritional status (e.g., albumin and protein intake), total body weight, or body water that may impact the Vd.
Other key concepts when treating patients with SE include tapering of ASMs, especially in the setting of an infusion that has been administered at anesthetic doses. Both BZPs and barbiturates can have withdrawal symptoms of anxiety, rest­lessness, insomnia, irritability, confusion, nausea, vomiting, tremor, muscle stiff­ness, seizure, psychosis, and autonomic changes such as hypertension, tachycardia, and diaphoresis.

18.4 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring

seizures, which requires continuous electroencephalography unless the patient awakens to baseline state), a best practice guideline was established for therapeu­tic drug monitoring (TDM) of ASM levels for key reasons: (1) to identify a target therapeutic concentration after titrating to clinical effectiveness since the cause of a change in drug response in the future may be identied by a level that varies from this target; (2) to evaluate for medication toxicity, especially when the thera­peutic index (TI), i.e., the margin between the therapeutic dose and toxic dose, is narrow; (3) to assess compliance, especially in patients with uncontrolled or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment when pharmacokinetics may vary (e.g., metabolic changes, concomitant medications, pregnancy); and (5) to guide dose adjustment with medications with dose-dependent pharmacokinet­ics, e.g., PHT [21].
18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
477
TI is dened as ED50/TD50, or the ratio of the drug concentration at which the drug is therapeutic or effective for 50% of patients (ED50) to the concentration that is toxic to 50% of patients (TD50) [22]. Older-generation ASMs such as PHT have a narrow TI with complicated pharmacokinetics and a high potential for DDIs. Although newer ASMs are less likely to have these concerns, TDM of newer ASMs in a real-world study showed clinical benet in seizure reduction and decreases in side effects [23].
Since albumin levels may uctuate widely during the hospital course of a criti­cally ill patient, TDM is especially helpful when ASMs are signicantly protein bound, e.g., PHT and VPA. In this situation, free levels might be helpful, although unless obtained on-site; delays in results can render the information less relevant in an ICU setting. When concomitant medications are administered, TDM can poten­tially assist the clinician in atypical dosing that may be necessary, although refer­ence ranges can be misleading. The references are based on statistics of when the majority of patients experienced optimal response and may not be relevant to the index patient.
The optimal timing to draw a medication level is when the ASM has reached a steady state, typically 4–5 half-lives after starting treatment or a dose adjustment. ASMs with long half-lives do not require a trough level; however, ASMs with mid­or short half-lives (<12h) may experience more uctuation with inconsistent anti­seizure efcacy, and a trough obtained just before a “steady-state” dosage administration might be useful (e.g., LEV, VPA, or TPM) (Table18.2).
Table 18.2 Target therapeutic index (TI) for selected ASMs
Drug Established target TI
Carbamazepine Clobazam Phenobarbital Phenytoin
a
(CBZ) 4–11μg/mL
a
(CLO) 0.03–0.3μg/mL
a
(PHB) 10–40μg/mL
a
(PHT) Total: 10–20μg/mL
Free: 1–2μg/mL
Valproic acid
a
(VPA) 50–100μg/mL
Drug Potential or suggested TI
Levetiracetam Brivaracetam Ganaxolone Lacosamide Lamotrigine Perampanel Topiramate
a
[21]
b
[24]
c
[25]
b
(LEV) 10–40μg/mL
b
(BRV) 0.2–2μg/mL
c
(GX) 85–250ng/mL
b
(LCM) 3–10μg/mL
b
(LTG) 3–13μg/mL
b
(PMP) 0.1–1μg/mL
b
(TPM) 2–10μg/mL
478
M. Trammel et al.

18.5 Adverse Drug Effects

Consideration of adverse drug effects (ADEs) includes (1) acute dose-related effects that are typically rapidly reversible, e.g., sedation, fatigue, sodium levels, platelets, and transaminases; (2) idiosyncratic ADEs that are less common but serious and often dose dependent, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis; and (3) cumulative toxicity, which is less likely a concern in SE when initiating ASM, as this typically requires a prolonged exposure over several months to years.
18.6 Management Strategies forTermination ofSE
In a study of patients with generalized convulsive status, successful termination with rst-line treatment with GABAergic medications such as lorazepam, PHB, or diazepam (DZP) with PHT varied between 64.9%, 58.2%, and 55%, respectively; however, the response rates for a second-line agent were 7.0% and 2.3% for third­line agents [26]. Thus, 35–45% of patients with SE fail rst-line therapy, and rapid escalation may help prevent RSE and improve outcomes [27].
When considering termination of SE, two major strategies include (1) enhance­ment of inhibitory processes and (2) opposition of excitatory processes. Initial immediate termination focuses on a fast-acting BZP to activate the GABAA receptor that allows negatively charged chloride cellular inux with neuronal inhibition. Subsequent second- and third-line therapy continues to attempt to leverage GABAergic inhibition through GABA receptors, GABA transaminase, or GABA­synthesizing enzyme glutamate decarboxylase. Additional strategies include (1) modulation of excitatory processes through decreases in the glutaminergic excit­atory activity (i.e., NMDA or AMPA glutamate receptors); (2) modulation of syn­aptic vesicles, i.e., synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A); and (3) direct or indirect action on voltage-gated sodium, calcium, or potassium ion channels by modication of the synthesis, metabolism, or function of neurotransmitters and receptors. SE termination often requires multiple mediations utilizing different tar­gets of action.
18.6.1 Guidelines forSE Termination
Various guidelines have been created to address strategies for the termination of SE [28, 29]. The guidelines universally discuss the initial use of a fast-acting BZP, fol­lowed by second-line parenteral medications. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) of 384 patients with SE refractory to BZP showed equiva­lent efcacy of seizure termination in patients randomized to an infusion over
18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
479
10min of (1) LEV 60mg/kg, maximum dose of 4500mg; (2) valproate 40mg/kg, maximum dose of 3000 mg; or (3) fosphenytoin 20 mg/kg, maximum dose of 1500mg [30]. There were no signicant differences in hypotension, intubation, or death. As such, these agents are the most frequently utilized second-line ASMs in SE.The primary outcome of cessation of SE and improvement in the level of con­sciousness at 60min occurred in 47% of patients treated with LEV, 46% with VPA, and 45% with fosphenytoin. However, 10.7–11.2% of patients had recurrent sei­zures or RSE.
The most recent SE guideline published in 2020 addresses refractory convulsive SE and evaluates the strength of evidence for the efcacy of eight parenteral ASMs as a third-line treatment [27]. For RSE, administration of parenteral medications often requires anesthetic/sedating doses that require endotracheal intubation. While administering parenteral agents to terminate seizures, enteral agents are often added with the eventual goal to wean parenteral medications but with adequate anti- seizure effect to prevent seizure/SE recurrence.

18.7 Anti-seizure Medications

18.7.1 Available Parenteral Preparations

18.7.1.1 Benzodiazepines: GABAA Receptor Activation
BZPs are positive allosteric modulators of postsynaptic GABAA receptors, which are ligand-gated chloride channels. BZPs bind to the α+/𝛾− subunit interface of the GABAA receptor, increasing the afnity of GABA binding to receptors. This increases the frequency of opening of the chloride channels, leading to membrane hyperpolarization with subsequent inhibition of neuronal activity. Other positive modulators that bind to different sites on the GABA
receptor include barbiturates,
A
alcohol, propofol (PRO), etomidate, and volatile anesthetics such as isourane [3133].
The lipophilic property of each of the BZPs often drives the bedside therapeutic choice. DZP, the most lipophilic, has fast CNS penetration but rapid redistribution, causing a short-acting anti-seizure effect. DZP may therefore be the ideal agent in a patient undergoing epilepsy monitoring in preparation for potential resection of an epileptogenic focus, as it can terminate a seizure to prevent SE but allow another seizure to occur, facilitating the localization of the nidus for resection. However, in most patients with SE, a longer-acting agent, such as lorazepam, is preferable to allow secondary administration of a longer-acting ASM to prevent further seizures when the BZP effect clears.
The SE guidelines universally address the essential initial step in the acute set­ting to terminate seizures as quickly as possible given the synaptic changes and the loss of GABAergic responsiveness following prolonged seizures. Rectal DZP is useful in an outpatient setting but with less ease of use and rapidity than an
480
M. Trammel et al.
intramuscular (IM) or IV route. As noted above, DZP is less utilized as an IV rst­line therapy due to its lipophilic properties conferring a shorter effective half-life for seizure termination compared to lorazepam. The RAMPART trial in the pre­hospital setting demonstrated that administration of IV lorazepam had faster ter­mination of seizures than IM midazolam (MDZ) when IV access is already established. However, when IV access is not yet obtained, the time to effective cessation of seizures is faster with IM MDZ when compared with IV lorazepam [28, 29, 34].
Secondary effects of BZPs and other GABAergic agents such as PRO and barbi­turates include a decrease in cerebral metabolic rate and cerebral blood ow [35]. Systemic effects include hypotension and respiratory depression inuenced by dos­age, rate of administration, and concomitant medications. Acute reversal with u­mazenil, a 1,4-imidazobenzodiazepine competitive antagonist at the BZP-binding site on the GABAA receptor, is not recommended in patients with SE, as seizures may be further potentiated [36]. Instead, hemodynamic and mechanical ventilatory support should be initiated accordingly if cardiac or respiratory ADEs occur.
Infusion/Anesthetic Dosing ofBZP asaThird-Line Therapy
When seizures persist despite the administration of both rst-line GABAergic treat­ment and a second-line therapy (e.g., LEV, VPA, and/or fosphenytoin), i.e., RSE, the guidelines recommend a third-line strategy of a parenteral infusion of an ASM with anesthetic properties to terminate seizures. Continuous EEG monitoring to detect NCSz/NCSE is essential. Current guidelines target seizure cessation, or alter­natively, a burst-suppression pattern [27, 28], although anecdotally, achieving a burst suppression pattern does not necessarily prevent break-through ictal activity (i.e. seizures) and close continuous EEG monitoring is essential.
Lorazepam, while an excellent rst-line IV ASM, is not an ideal option for a continuous infusion due to a diluent, propylene glycol (1,2-propanediol). Propylene glycol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase in the liver to lactaldehyde and then by aldehyde dehydrogenase to lactate, acetate, and pyruvate, causing both a severe anion gap metabolic acidosis and an osmolar gap [37]. Missing the diagnosis of an unexplained anion gap acidosis, typically associated with an osmolar gap, may lead to progressive hypotension and acute kidney injury due to acute tubular necro­sis [38]. Propylene toxicity can also occur when administering high-dose injections or infusions of diazepam or pentobarbital (PTB).
MDZ is water soluble at lower pH and does not require propylene glycol to maintain stability as an infusion. MDZ infusions are well tolerated and require higher doses on average to reach therapeutic efcacy for seizure cessation when compared to doses needed for sedative effects. MDZ has excellent CNS penetration due to its lipophilicity and is 94–98% protein bound. Agents, e.g., aspirin, that com­pete for the site where MDZ binds to albumin may enhance the action of MDZ [39]. The therapeutic effect of MDZ is complex due to metabolism by hepatic and intes­tinal CYP3A4 to its active metabolite, 1-hydroxymidazolam, followed by
18
tatus Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
S
481
glucuronidation and renal excretion. As expected, inhibitors of CYP3A4 activity such as erythromycin, diltiazem, verapamil, and azole antifungals can prolong the effect of MDZ.Although prolonged use of MDZ infusions induces hepatic CYP3A activity, the half-life of MDZ can increase due to a rise in its Vd and an increase in its free fraction [40]. Importantly, for patients with SE, other ASMs are often co­administered and can affect the action of MDZ.
It is essential to recall the potential for withdrawal complications when an MDZ infusion is used for a prolonged period and at high doses. Adding a long-acting enteral BZP such as clonazepam or clobazam may increase the safety of weaning a parenteral infusion (Table18.3).
18.7.1.2 Other GABAergic Therapies
In addition to MDZ, other parenteral medications, such as barbiturates and PRO, can be utilized to terminate seizures.
Barbiturates: GABAergic
First used in 1912, phenobarbital (PHB) was predated by the rst documented ASM, potassium bromide, which was isolated from the Mediterranean Sea in 1826 [43]. Barbiturates bind to the β-subunit of the GABAA receptor to increase the dura­tion of the opening of the chloride channel without altering the channel conductance or opening frequency. This increase in the mean open duration results in neuronal hyperpolarization and inhibition. However, at higher plasma concentrations (>50μM), such as those achieved with PTB infusions, barbiturates directly open GABAA receptors in the absence of GABA [44]. Barbiturates also reduce AMPA/ kainate receptor-mediated signals resulting in decreasing glutamate excitatory post­synaptic currents [45]. Studies show that barbiturates decrease cerebral metabolic rate and cerebral blood ow in animals and brain-injured humans, which can also decrease intracranial hypertension in a low cerebral compliance state [46, 47].
Table 18.3 Benzodiazepines for seizure termination [27, 41, 42]
Drug Pros Cons
Lorazepam Optimal choice for IV bolus
administration
Midazolam Optimal choice agent for IM
administration and IV infusion at anesthetic dosages
Diazepam Rectal route available Rapid redistribution with a short duration of action.
IV intravenous, IM intramuscular
Dilute 1:1 with saline due to high viscosity. IV product contains propylene glycol. Not recommended for infusion
Rapid redistribution (short duration of action), renal and hepatic dysfunction can result in accumulation of active metabolites. IV product contains propylene glycol, but infusion does not
IV product contains propylene glycol
482
M. Trammel et al.
Phenobarbital
Phenobarbital (PHB), albeit the oldest ASM still in use, is no longer a treatment of choice for seizures because of sedation and signicant DDIs but may be considered as a bridge to weaning from a long-term PTB infusion. PHB is approximately 50% protein bound with an estimated Vd of 0.6L/kg [48]. It is metabolized in the liver primarily by CYP2C9, with minor metabolism by CYP2C19 and CYP2E1, and approximately 25% is excreted unchanged in the urine. It has a long half-life of 100–160h in adults. In children, metabolism is increased with a reported half-life of 103h in term infants and 67h in infants 4weeks of age [49].
PHB is a potent inducer of hepatic enzymes and can speed the metabolism of other hepatically cleared medications, thereby decreasing their efcacy [50]. However, the metabolism and clearance of PHB can be inhibited with subsequent PHB accumulation by felbamate, oxcarbazepine, PHT, and VPA [5153]. PHB ADEs are similar to all barbiturates: lethargy and somnolence are major complaints.
Infusion/Anesthetic Dosing ofBarbiturates asaThird-Line Therapy
Pentobarbital Infusion
Pentobarbital (PTB) is 45–75% protein-bound, metabolized by hydroxylation to an inactive metabolite with urinary excretions after glucuronidation. PTB is a potent inducer of hepatic enzymes such as CYP2A6. It is moderately lipophilic and readily crosses the blood-brain barrier. The IV solution has a pH of 9.5 and requires a pro­pylene glycol diluent, which makes it incompatible with many other IV medications and requires monitoring for osmolar or anion gap acidosis at higher doses. Given its lipophilicity and hepatic metabolism, elimination is biphasic. The rst phase is about 4h and may require additional loading boluses to reach a steady-state plasma concentration; the second phase is 35–50h and can be longer depending on drug accumulation in adipose and muscle [54].
PTB ADEs frequently include hypotension due to peripheral and splanchnic blood vessel dilation [55] and are accentuated with rapid administration. More com­plicated ADEs typically appear with high doses of PTB. Effects on the brainstem include cardiorespiratory depression [56], progressive loss of cough reex, shiver­ing response, corneal reexes, and eventually pupillary dilation. Systemically, higher levels of PTB can correspond to loss of tracheal epithelium ciliary motility [57], ileus [58], and suppression of the immunological response to infection by inhibiting lymphocytic activation and inhibiting phagocytosis by leukocytes [59].
Thiopental
Infusion
Thiopental (THP) is less frequently utilized than PTB for SE.Although it is typi­cally considered a short-acting anesthetic, it is more lipophilic than PTB, and as a result, it rapidly redistributes to the muscle and fat with an initial half-time of
18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
483
15min. The secondary half-life of THP is approximately 7h due to a high Vd sec­ondary to its lipophilicity [60]; thus, long-term thiopental infusions can result in elimination half-lives ranging from 18 to 36h [61], and its use can be complicated by prolonged emergence from sedation once an infusion is stopped.
Propofol Infusion: GABAergic
Propofol (PRO) is an alkylphenol that acts as a GABA
receptor agonist that acti-
A
vates the -1 subunit of the chloride channel in the receptor increasing the duration of channel opening. PRO also inuences presynaptic GABAergic transmission through GABA uptake and GABA release [62]. When utilized for SE cessation, weaning of PRO has been associated with seizure recurrence; therefore, additional ASM therapies may be necessary before decreasing or stopping the PRO infu­sion [63].
PRO is highly lipid-soluble with poor water solubility and is formulated in a lipid emulsion of 10% soybean oil, 2.25% glycerol, and 1.2% lecithin from puried egg phosphatide. It must be used with caution in patients with egg yolk allergies or patients with disorders of fat metabolism. The risk for infection is high; therefore, vials and tubing must be changed every 12h. PRO is more than 95% protein-bound and highly lipophilic with a quick onset of action. It is primarily metabolized to inactive metabolites through hepatic glucuronidation and excreted in urine, although extrahepatic sites such as the lungs are responsible for the biotransformation of PRO to an inactive metabolite [64].
Like other GABAergic anesthetics, PRO decreases cerebral metabolic rate and cerebral blood ow. PRO can be associated with profound hypotension due to a decrease in cardiac β-adrenoceptor responsiveness [65] and peripheral vasodilation due to inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction [66] with decreased cerebral per­fusion pressure unless caution is taken during administration. PRO is classically associated with respiratory depression and hypertriglyceridemia; therefore, adjust­ment of enteral or parenteral nutrition may be necessary to avoid overfeeding the patient when administered at high dosages [67]. A rare but potentially life-threaten­ing complication of PRO includes propofol-related infusion syndrome (PRIS). PRIS is characterized by opisthotonos, muscle rigidity, choreoathetoid movements, myoclonus, seizures, hyperthermia, hyperkalemia, and metabolic and lactic acido­sis due to direct mitochondrial respiratory chain inhibition or impaired mitochon­drial fatty acid metabolism. When untreated, patients can progress to rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, transaminitis, hypotension, and arrhythmias, including ventric­ular tachycardia and brillation, or bradycardia leading to asystole/cardiac failure. First reported in children, it has also been found in adults, typically with higher dose (>5mg/kg/h) infusions lasting more than 48h [68].
484
M. Trammel et al.
18.7.1.3 Second-Line Non-anesthetic ASMs
Phenytoin andFosphenytoin: Sodium Channel Blocker
Phenytoin (PHT), synthesized as a barbiturate derivative in 1908 and rst used as an ASM in 1937, is the second oldest ASM still in clinical use. Fosphenytoin (fosPHT) is a phosphorylated ester prodrug of PHT that was rst approved in 1996. The IV solution of PHT has poor water solubility, and its diluents include propylene glycol and alcohol adjusted to a pH of 12. FosPHT has a pH of 8.6–9.0 that enhances the solubility and safety if an infusion extravasates and in the hemodynamic tolerance to rapid infusion. FosPHT is more frequently utilized in clinical practice due to its safety prole and is rapidly metabolized to PHT by red blood cell and liver phos­phatases in a 1:1 conversion to PHT.
PHT binds to the neuronal inner cytoplasmic membrane at the inner vestibule of the pore of the voltage-gated sodium channel in its inactive state. This action pro­longs the neuronal refractory period and stabilizes the neuronal membrane [69, 70]. PHT may also inhibit postsynaptic voltage-gated calcium channels [71, 72]. PHT is 90–95% protein bound, and active free levels are increased by hypoalbuminemia or displacement by other medications, such as VPA. Its Vd increases with the dose from 0.52 to 0.78L/kg. PHT is metabolized primarily hepatically via CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 enzymes to an active metabolite that is excreted in the urine. The metabo­lite is saturable, which results in a nonlinear dose-serum concentration relation. PHT demonstrates rst-order kinetics at low plasma levels, but at therapeutic levels and saturable hepatic metabolism, it shifts to zero-order kinetics with large changes in plasma levels with small dose adjustments. It reaches peak plasma concentration in about 30min.
PHT signicantly induces hepatic enzymes and affects levels of PHB, CBZ, fel­bamate, oxcarbazepine, TPM, omeprazole, MDZ, uoxetine, amiodarone, digoxin, cyclosporine, estrogens, progestogens, voriconazole, uconazole, and itracon­azole [73].
Short-term toxic side effects include nystagmus, loss of smooth extraocular pur­suit, diplopia, ataxia, skin rash, or fever. Long-term use can be complicated by gin­gival hyperplasia, calvarial hyperostosis, hirsutism, peripheral neuropathy, cerebellar atrophy, and vitamin D and B12 deciency [74].
When transitioning from parenteral dosing to enteral administration, it is impor­tant to recognize that only the PHT sodium salt extended-release oral formulation can be given once a day, while other formulations in suspension, chewable tablets, or IV should be dosed at least twice or three times per day.
Valproic Acid: GABAergic, Sodium, andCalcium Channel Activity
Valproic acid (VPA) is a simple 8-carbon branched-chain fatty (carboxylic) acid derived from valeric acid that is different from most ASMs that are heterocyclic nitrogen-containing compounds. VPA is typically well-tolerated as a rapid infusion,
18 Status Epilepticus andRefractory Status Epilepticus
485
although it does have signicant DDIs [53, 75]. VPA has multiple mechanisms of action, including attenuation of voltage-gated sodium ion channels by blocking the neuronal entry of sodium; inhibition of GABA transaminase, which blocks GABA degradation; increasing GABA synthesis by increasing the expression and activity of glutamic acid decarboxylase; modulation of calcium channels and NMDA recep­tors; and inhibition of histone deacetylase, which affects gene regulation associated with synaptic transmission, neurogenesis, inammation, and neuronal plastic­ity [76].
VPA is 90% protein-bound, with saturable binding at higher therapeutic levels resulting in higher free VPA levels. The Vd of VPA is 0.15–0.22L/kg. VPA under­goes extensive hepatic biotransformation by mitochondrial β-oxidation, microsomal hydroxylation, glucuronidation, and other conjugation reactions with excretion of its multiple metabolites in the urine. Less than 3% is excreted unchanged in the urine. As a fatty acid, VPA is a substrate for fatty acid β-oxidation, which takes place primarily in mitochondria. VPA-induced impairment of mitochondrial func­tion and fatty acid metabolism is likely the cause of its signicant ADEs [77]. VPA has a well-identied risk for hyperammonemia due to the interference of the conver­sion of ammonia to urea and is contraindicated in children and adults with known or suspected mitochondrial disorders or disorders of fatty acid metabolism or risk for hyperammonemia. Given the effect of VPA on the carnitine shuttle that results in the depletion of carnitine stores during long-term or high-dose therapy, co- administration of -carnitine may prevent VPA hepatotoxicity and hyperammonemia [78]. VPA has a black box warning for hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, and teratogenicity due to the 1–2% risk for neural tube defects, e.g., spina bida, if used during the rst tri­mester of pregnancy. Other side effects include tremor, somnolence, weight-gain, nausea, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia [79].
The co-administration of ASMs that induce hepatic enzymes such as CBZ, bar­biturates, or PHT will accelerate VPA metabolism and require an increase in dos­ages. Conversely, VPA competes with PHT and BZPs for serum protein-binding sites, and concomitant administration raises the free concentration of VPA [80]. Free levels of VPA may be helpful when ASM co-administration is necessary; how­ever, results are often delayed and not clinically relevant in an emergent setting due to off-site testing.
Unlike most ASMs that induce hepatic enzymes, increasing clearance and decreasing plasma levels, VPA is well known to inhibit enzymatic metabolism and increase plasma levels of ASMs such as PHB, PHT, CBZ, and lamotrigine (LTG) [19, 81]. Thus, the unpredictable relationship between VPA and other medications often makes it a challenging medication in complicated patients.
Levetiracetam: Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A Binding
Levetiracetam (LEV) is a pyrrolidinone that was rst approved in 1999, and the IV preparation in 2006. Unlike most ASMs, its primary mechanism of action is not through inhibitory or excitatory neurotransmitter receptor activity but a novel