Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5851_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
48 Мб
Скачать
8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
the outpatient or emergency department setting. Of all patients determined not to have PE and did not receive treatment, only one patient developed VTE at 3months. Importantly, the use of probability-adapted D-dimer thresholds resulted in 17.6% less patients receiving chest imaging for PE workup compared to the traditional threshold of <500ng/mL for low- or moderate-probability patients [50].
In the YEARS study, clinical pretest probability scoring with three of the original Wells criteria (i.e., YEARS items)—(1) clinical signs of DVT, (2) hemoptysis, and (3) PE is the most likely diagnosis—was applied to inpatients and outpatients with suspected PE.PE was excluded if patients had zero YEARS criteria and D-dimer <1000ng/mL or 1 YEARS criteria and D-dimer <500ng/mL; otherwise, com­puted tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was pursued. Use of YEARS criteria and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer resulted in a <1% risk of VTE at 3months and a 14% decrease in CTPA testing among patients of all ages compared to the use of standard Wells criteria and D-dimer <500ng/mL [107].
Similarly, YEARS criteria and clinical probability-adapted D-dimer thresholds were evaluated in pregnant women in the Artemis study. Compression ultrasonogra­phy evaluating for DVT was pursued if patients had no YEARS criteria and D-dimer 1000ng/mL or 1 YEARS criteria and D-dimer 500ng/mL.If DVT was not identied on ultrasound, only then was CTPA pursued to minimize radiation expo­sure during pregnancy. This algorithm safely ruled out PE across all trimesters but was most efcient in avoiding CTPA in patients who began the study during their rst trimester [108].
Based on recent literature, it is reasonable to use an age or clinical probability­adapted D-dimer threshold in conjunction with pretest probability scoring to guide further workup for PE.
181

8.2.2 Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)

CTPA is the gold standard for conrming the presence of PE.Intravenous radi­opaque contrast allows for the visualization and detection of lling defects in the pulmonary arteries on computed tomography. For patients with a low or intermedi­ate probability of PE, guidelines suggest that a negative CTPA is adequate to exclude PE.However, the negative predictive value is low for patients with high clinical probability [59]. Figure 8.1 shows lling defects (pulmonary thromboemboli) in bilateral pulmonary arteries, which are consistent with acute PE.

8.2.3 Mortality Risk Assessment

Risk factors for PE-associated morbidity and mortality were poorly understood until the publication of the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER) data from 2110 patients with proven PE in 1999. Overall, 4.2% of
182
Fig. 8.1 CTPA demonstrating lling defects (pulmonary thromboemboli) in bilateral pulmonary arteries consistent with acute PE. CTPA computed tomography pulmonary angiography
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
patients presented with hemodynamic instability. However, the presence of hemo­dynamic instability (SBP <90mmHg) at presentation was associated with a higher mortality at 3months (58.3%) compared to those who were hemodynamically sta­ble (15.1%). Multiple-regression modeling demonstrated that age over 70years, cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, systolic arterial hypotension, tachypnea, and right ventricular hypokinesis on echocardiog­raphy were signicant indicators of poor prognosis [35]. Findings from this registry shaped future studies seeking to identify risk factors for high-risk PE.
8.2.3.1 PE Severity Index Score
The pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) score is the most validated clinical score for risk stratication of patients presenting with PE (Table8.4). It was derived from a study of over 15,000 patients at 186 Pennsylvania hospitals to predict 30-day mortality in PE and then validated in a European study of 221 inpatients with PE.Patients who did not meet any PESI criteria were considered low-risk PE and found to have 30-day mortality rates of 1.5% or less [4]. Another study found 90-day mortality using the original score in low-risk patients (classes I–II) to be 1.1% com­pared with 11.1% in moderate- to very-high-risk patients (risk classes III–V). Ultimately, the score was simplied, and the RIETE validation cohort demonstrated a
1.1% 30-day mortality in the low-risk group versus 8.9% in the high-risk group [45]. Overall, the PESI score has a 99% negative predictive value and is a useful tool to identify patients at low risk of death who may be managed as an outpatient for PE [24].
8.2.3.2 Prognostic Indicators
While anticoagulation is the rst-line treatment for hemodynamically stable patients with PE, patients demonstrating poor prognostic indicators may require thrombo­lytic therapy or surgical or mechanical thrombectomy. Review of prognostic
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
8
Table 8.4 Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score [10]
Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score Parameters Original Simplied
Age Age in years 1 point (if age
Altered mental status +60 points – Arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation
<90% Cancer +30 points 1 point Chronic heart failure +10 points 1 point Chronic pulmonary disease +10 points – Male sex +10 points Pulse rate 110 beats/minute +20 points 1 point Respiratory rate >30/min +20 points – Systolic BP <100mm Hg +30 points 1 point Temperature <36°C +20 points
Interpretation Risk Stratication 30-day mortality
Low risk Class I: 65 points
Moderate risk High risk Very high risk
+20 points 1 point
(0%–1.6%) Class II: 66–85 points (1.7%–3.5%)
Class III: 86–105 points (3.2%–7.1%) Class IV:106–125 points (4%–11.4%) Class V: >125 points (10%–24.5%)
>80years)
0 points (1%)
1 point (10.9%)
183
indicators is especially important for those with intermediate-risk PE since evidence of RV dysfunction or cardiac ischemia portends an increased risk of mortality and may necessitate a higher level of care or additional intervention. Pharmacists should be familiar with poor prognostic indicators.
Transthoracic echocardiography of the RV may detect changes in ventricular function caused by acute pressure overload from PE.Findings consistent with RV dysfunction include right ventricular hypokinesis and dilatation, interventricular septal attening and paradoxical motion toward the left ventricle, tricuspid regurgi­tation, pulmonary hypertension, and loss of inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava [10]. These ndings of acute PE without right ventricular dysfunction on CTPA are shown in Fig.8.2.
Patients presenting with acute PE and RV/LV diameter ratio of 1 or greater and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) less than 16mm are at increased risk of 30-day PE-related mortality or need for rescue thrombolysis, even if they are initially hemodynamically stable [59, 85]. Similarly, an RV/LV diameter ratio of 0.9 or greater on CTPA is associated with a vefold increased risk for PE-related mor­tality or clinical deterioration [8, 70]. Figure 8.3 demonstrates these ndings of acute PE causing right ventricular dysfunction on CTPA.
184
Fig. 8.2 CTPA of acute pulmonary embolism without right ventricular dysfunction. Note: RV/LV diameter ratio <1. CTPA computed tomography pulmonary angiography; RV/LV right ventricular to left ventricular ratio
Fig. 8.3 CTPA of acute pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dysfunction. Note: RV/LV diameter ratio >1; Same patient from Fig.8.2 after presenting with recurrent, high risk PE. CTPA computed tomography pulmonary angiography, RV/LV right ventricular to left ventricular ratio
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic pep­tide (NT-proBNP) are markers of RV dilatation in PE.A meta-analysis of 1132 patients with acute PE demonstrated that BNP or NT-proBNP elevations were associated with nearly sevenfold increases in complicated hospital course or 30-day mortality [55].
High-risk electrocardiographic (ECG) ndings may represent RV dysfunction in PE [48]. While the most common ECG changes in acute PE include tachycardia, T-wave inversion in lead V1, and ST elevation in lead aVR, the following ndings are predictors of hemodynamic collapse and 30-day mortality: heart rate above 100 beats/minute, S1Q3T3 pattern, complete right bundle branch block, inverted T waves in V1-V4, ST elevation in aVR, and atrial brillation [93].
In the setting of PE, troponin elevations represent myocardial injury due to RV overload and are associated with increased risk for short-term, PE-related mortality, and serious adverse events even in hemodynamically stable patients [6, 10]. Since
Acute Pulmonary Embolism
8
185
Table 8.5 Pulmonary embolism classication based on prognostic indicators [10, 48, 59]
Hemodynamic instability RV dysfunction Myocardial injury
Cardiac arrest Obstructive shock
Systolic BP<90mm Hg Vasopressors required to achieve systolic BP90mm Hg with evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion
Persistent hypotension
Systolic BP<90mm Hg or a systolic BP drop 40mm Hg for >15min not from another cause
RV dilatation
Apical four-chamber RV/LV diameter of 1 on CTPA or TTE. Elevation of BNP>90pg/mL or N-terminal prohormone BNP>500pg/mL
ECG ndings
HR>100 beats/minute S
pattern
1Q3T3
Complete right bundle
branch block
Troponin T >0.1ng/mL High sensitivity troponin T
<75years old:
14pg/mL75years old: 45pg/mL
Tropnin I >0.4ng/mL
Inverted T waves in
V
1–V4
ST elevation in aVR Atrial brillation
High risk Present Present Present
Comment: Troponin measurement not required if hemo­dynamic instability or
V dysfunction
R
Intermediate risk
High risk
Present Present
features Low risk
1 indicator present
features
Low risk
BNP brain naturietic peptide, BP blood pressure, CTPA computed tomography pulmonary angiog­raphy, ECG electrocardiogram, HR heart rate, LV left ventricle, PESI Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, RV right ventricle, sPESI Simplied Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, TTE transthoracic echocardiogram Adapted with permission from: Konstantinides etal. [59]
a
Cardiac arrest, obstructive shock (systolic BP <90mm Hg or vasopressors required to achieve systolic BP 90mm Hg, with end-organ hypoperfusion), or persistent hypotension (systolic BP <90mm Hg or a systolic BP drop 40mm Hg for >15min) not from another cause
b
If hemodynamic instability plus CTPA-conrmed PE and/or evidence of RV dysfunction on TTE are seen, neither PESI calculation nor troponin measurement are additionally required to classify high-risk PE
c
Signs of RV dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarker levels may be present, despite a calculated PESI I-II or sPESI of zero. Current guidelines recommend classication into the intermediate-risk category
age and renal function impact levels, age-adjusted cutoffs for high-sensitivity tropo­nin T are useful to identify patients who may benet from additional monitoring and/or early reperfusion therapy [46].
Evaluation of prognostic indicators in conjunction with PESI scoring forms the
basis of PE classication, as outlined in Table8.5.
186
8.3 Initial Management per Risk Stratication
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
8.3.1
Initial
Management
Patients with a high or intermediate clinical probability of PE should be initiated on anticoagulation without delay while the workup is in progress [59]. The pharmacist clinician should work with the treatment team to guide initial management, includ­ing the choice of anticoagulant as well as supportive care based on the patient’s risk stratication (Table8.6).
8.3.1.1
w-Risk PE
Lo
Patients presenting to the ED with low-risk PE have a lower rate of 30-day mortal­ity, and appropriateness for early discharge should be assessed. Advanced interven­tions such as reperfusion therapy or surgery are not routinely performed for low-risk
Table 8.6 Treatment considerations based on the severity of PE
PE
Classication Care Site Anticoagulation
Low risk Early
Intermediate-
lo
w risk
Intermediate-
high risk
High risk Hospitalize;
AC anticoagulation, LMWH low molecular weight heparin, OAC oral anticoagulation, UFH unfractionated heparin
discharge for eligible patients
Hospitalize Oral AC or parenteral
Hospitalize with close monitoring
admit to a critical care unit
Rapid anticoagulation with an oral AC (e.g., apixaban or rivaroxaban) is preferred over parenteral AC; Certain OAC will require initial treatment with a parenteral AC
AC (LMWH or fondaparinux preferred)
Parenteral AC (consider UFH if concern for hemodynamic decompensation)
Parenteral AC (e.g., UFH)
Reperfusion Therapies Considerations
Not routinely recommended
Not routinely recommended
Not routinely recommended however may be benecial in severe cases
Consider immediate reperfusion therapies
Patients with adequate family/ social support and easy access to medication without other reason for hospitalization can be considered for early discharge
Consider other patient/disease factors when determining oral vs parenteral AC
Monitor closely for clinical deterioration refractory to standard anticoagulation
Provide supportive care (oxygen, hemodynamic optimization, mechanical circulatory support) in addition to reperfusion therapy
8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
187
PE.Home treatment may be appropriate for patients with a low risk of PE-related death, no serious comorbidities or concomitant conditions requiring hospitalization, and no barriers to compliance with outpatient treatment. The pharmacist clinician is poised to provide anticoagulation counseling, address patient questions, and relay signs and symptoms that would warrant re-presentation back to the ED.
For patients appropriate to receive home treatment, rapid anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is preferred over inpatient treatment with 5days of a parenteral anticoagulant [59, 99]. Notably, certain oral anticoagulants including dabigatran and edoxaban require initial treatment with a parenteral anticoagulation for a minimum of 5days prior to transitioning to the oral agent. Vitamin K antago­nists (VKAs) such as warfarin require an overlap with a parenteral anticoagulant upon initiation until a therapeutic INR between 2.0 and 3.0 is achieved, typically for a minimum of 5days. In contrast, apixaban and rivaroxaban can be initiated imme­diately following the PE diagnosis as the sole agent. Apixaban and rivaroxaban require higher initial doses when initiating upon diagnosis of a PE according to the FDA-approved package insert, for 7 and 21 days, respectively [59, 77, 99]. The choice of oral anticoagulant depends on patient-specic factors such as renal func­tion, affordability, drug-drug interactions, and other comorbidities such as antiphos­pholipid antibody syndrome. Frequency of dosing (e.g., once daily or twice daily) is an important factor for patients with concern for medication compliance. For a patient who otherwise has no contraindications, the use of a DOAC is preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKA) [77]. Additional considerations for oral anticoagu­lants are listed in Table8.7.
Table 8.8 outlines the initiation and maintenance phases of each oral anticoagu­lant. Patients not eligible for rapid anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban will require initial management with a parenteral anticoagulant. Subcutaneous injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux can be administered at home with appropriate patient education. The choice of anticoagu­lant for specic populations, such as those experiencing pregnancy or cancer, is discussed further in forthcoming sections.
Patient access to medical care and social support must be considered prior to discharge to ensure proper outpatient care and anticoagulant treatment [59]. Patients with a history of poor compliance or those who cannot afford medications are not ideal candidates for early discharge during the acute phase of PE [77].
8.3.1.2
Intermediate-Risk
PE
PE is categorized as an intermediate risk if a patient presents with clinical signs of severe PE without evidence of hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest or hypotension. Patients are stratied as having intermediate-risk PE if meeting the criteria for PESI class III–V or sPESI 1 or if there is evidence of RV dysfunction and/or myocardial injury. Patients in the intermediate-risk category are not candi­dates for early discharge home treatment, and hospitalization for close monitoring is recommended. The initial management of intermediate-risk PE also includes
188
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Use in Renal Dysfunction
(ESRD, CrCl <30ml/min)
Routine Dose
Monitoring Major Drug Interactions
Maintenance Dose
Frequency per Day
*
dietary interactions
Can initiate
Table 8.7 Considerations and characteristics of oral AC
immediately on
diagnosis
Requires initial
parenteral AC
Rivaroxaban Once CYP3A4
Factor Xa Inhibitors
Apixaban Twice CYP3A4
Medication
Edoxaban Once P-glycoprotein
Direct Thrombin Inhibitor
Vitamin K Antagonist
Warfarin Once Multiple CYP450 and
Dabigatran Twice P-glycoprotein
*
Edoxaban may not be ideal for VTE treatment in patients with CrCl >95ml/min
8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Table 8.8 Initiation and maintenance dosing of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of PE
Medication Initiation phase Maintenance phase
Apixaban 10mg twice daily for 7days upon diagnosis of PE 5mg twice daily Rivaroxaban 15mg twice daily for 21days upon diagnosis of PE 20mg once daily with
Edoxaban Requires 5–10days of parenteral anticoagulation
prior to initiation
Dabigatran Requires 5–10days of parenteral anticoagulation
prior to initiation
Warfarin Requires overlap with a parenteral anticoagulation
upon initiation until therapeutic INR is achieved (typically for 5days)
meals 60mg once daily
150mg twice daily
Patient-specic dose to maintain INR between 2 and 3
189
anticoagulation without delay while the workup is in progress. However, pharmacist clinicians should work with the care team to anticipate the risk for decompensation or need for intervention as this will impact the choice of initial anticoagulation.
Patients with intermediate-risk PE can be further categorized as intermediate­low risk if they do not have both RV dysfunction and myocardial injury. They may be treated with either a parenteral anticoagulant or a rapid-acting oral anticoagulant similar to the management of low-risk PE.If a parenteral agent is chosen, LMWH or fondaparinux is recommended over the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH). LMWH and fondaparinux can be given subcutaneously, whereas UFH is adminis­tered as a continuous intravenous infusion. UFH requires close monitoring of anti­ Xa activity to ensure therapeutic levels and carry a higher risk of bleeding and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [59, 77, 99]. However, individual patient factors and pharmacokinetics of each agent should be considered when choosing a paren­teral anticoagulant. For example, UFH may be preferred in patients with renal dys­function or in certain situations where a shorter acting, quickly reversible agent is optimal.
PE is classied as an intermediate-high risk if both RV dysfunction and myocar­dial injury are present. Patients with intermediate-high risk are at a higher risk of progressive hemodynamic decompensation. Even though routine thrombolytic use is not recommended to all patients in this category, reperfusion therapies may be benecial, particularly in the setting of elevated lactate 2mmol/L, elevated BNP, elevated shock index (HR/SBP) >1, or concomitant DVT [39]. In patients who are likely to receive systemic thrombolysis, it may be prudent to administer intravenous UFH infusion given its shorter half-life compared to subcutaneous injections. UFH should target factor Xa inhibition of 0.3–0.7units/mL [72]. Additionally, subcuta­neous anticoagulants such as LMWH or fondaparinux may not have reliable absorp­tion in the setting of hypoperfusion [48, 59, 77]. The route, dose, and additional considerations for each parenteral anticoagulant are described in Table8.9.
190
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Table 8.9 Parenteral anticoagulants for the treatment of PE in adults [20, 32, 114]
Medication Route Dose
Dosing Weight Considerations
Dose Adjustment Consideration
Unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins
UFH IV 80units/kg IV
bolus followed by 18units/ kg/h infusion
Use actual body weight; consider lower doses in patients with obesity
Titrate to therapeutic aPTT (1.5–2.5 times control) or anti-factor Xa (0.3–0.7units/ mL) according to institutional
Preferred in patients with hemodynamic instability or renal dysfunction; monitor for heparin resistance or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
protocol
Dalteparin SC 200units/kg
every 24h 100units/kg twice daily
Use actual body weight to a maximum of 190kg
Routine monitoring of anti-factor Xa is not performed
Not recommended in patients on dialysis or CrCl
<30mL/min however may be considered in patients with high risk of bleeding or 150kg
Enoxaparin SC 1mg/kg twice
daily
1.5mg/kg every 24h CrCl <30mL/ min: 1mg/kg every 24h
Use actual body weight; consider lower doses in patients with
*
obesity
Routine monitoring of anti-factor Xa is not performed however may be considered in patients with
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis
high risk of bleeding or 150kg
Tinzaparin SC 175 anti-Xa
units/kg every 24h
Use actual body weight; a xed upper dose limit is not recommended
Routine monitoring of anti-factor Xa is not performed however may be considered in
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis or CrCl
<20mL/min
patients with high risk of bleeding, CrCl 20–<30mL/ min, or obesity
Factor Xa inhibitor (indirect thrombin inhibitor)
Fondaparinux SC <50kg: 5mg
every 24h 50–100kg:
7.5mg every 24h
Limited data available in patients with BMI >45kg/m or >150kg
Routine monitoring of anti-factor Xa is
2
not performed
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis or CrCl
<30mL/min
>100kg: 10mg every 24h
(continued)