Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5851_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Foreword
- •Contents of Volume I
- •Contents of Volume II
- •Contributors
- •1.1 Introduction
- •1.4.3 Acute Stroke
- •1.4.4 CNS Infection
- •1.4.1 Sepsis
- •1.4.2 Acute Encephalopathy
- •1.4.5 Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia
- •1.4.6 Nosocomial Pneumonia
- •1.4.7 Pulmonary Edema
- •1.4.8 Fever
- •References
- •2.1 Introduction
- •2.4 ECG Nomenclature
- •2.4.1 P Wave
- •2.4.2 PR Interval
- •2.4.3 QRS Complex
- •2.4.4 J Point
- •2.4.5 ST Segment
- •2.4.6 T Wave
- •2.4.7 QT Interval
- •2.4.8 U Wave
- •2.4.9 RR Interval
- •2.5.1 P Wave
- •2.5.1.1 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •Atrial Fibrillation
- •Atrial Flutter
- •Atrial Tachycardia
- •Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia
- •2.5.1.2 Interatrial Blocks
- •Intermittent Interatrial Block (I-IAB)
- •Advanced Interatrial Block (A-IAB)
- •2.5.2 P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.2.1 Shortened P-QRS Ratio
- •Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW)
- •Junctional Rhythm
- •Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT)
- •2.5.2.3 Prolonged P-QRS Ratio
- •2.5.3 PR Interval
- •2.5.3.1 Shortened PR Interval
- •2.5.3.2 Prolonged PR Interval
- •2.5.3.3 Second-Degree AV Block
- •Advanced AV Block
- •Third-Degree AV Block (Complete Heart Block)
- •2.5.4 PR Segment
- •2.5.4.1 PR-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.4.2 PR-Segment Depression
- •Acute Pericarditis
- •Acute Myocardial Ischemia
- •2.5.5 Q Waves
- •2.5.6 QRS Complex
- •2.5.6.1 Heart Rate
- •2.5.7 QT Interval
- •2.5.8 ST Segment
- •2.5.8.1 ST-Segment Depression
- •2.5.8.2 ST-Segment Elevation
- •2.5.9 T Waves
- •2.5.9.1 Inverted T Wave
- •2.5.9.2 Flattened T Wave
- •2.5.9.3 Peaked T Wave
- •References
- •Further Reading
- •3.1 Introduction
- •3.2.2 Nasogastric Tube
- •3.2.3 Central Venous Catheters
- •3.2.4 Cardiac Devices
- •3.2.5 Arterial Catheters
- •3.3 Cardiopulmonary Abnormalities
- •3.3.1 Pulmonary Edema
- •3.3.2 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •3.3.3 Atelectasis
- •3.3.4 Aspiration
- •3.3.5 Pneumonia
- •References
- •4.1 Introduction
- •4.5 Modes of Mechanical Ventilation
- •4.5.1 Volume Control Ventilation
- •4.5.2 Pressure Control Ventilation
- •4.5.3 Pressure Support Ventilation
- •4.6 Patient-Ventilator Interactions
- •4.6.1 Trigger Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.2 Flow Dyssynchrony
- •4.6.3 Cycle Dyssynchrony
- •4.9.1 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- •4.9.2 Severe Asthma Exacerbation
- •4.11 Summary
- •5.10 Neuromuscular Blockade
- •References
- •5.1 Introduction
- •5.3 Pathobiology
- •5.4 ARDS Phenotypes
- •5.5 Lung-Protective Ventilation
- •5.6 Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
- •5.7 Conservative Fluid Management
- •5.8 Moderate-to-Severe ARDS
- •5.9 Prone Positioning
- •5.11 Corticosteroids
- •5.12 Inhaled Pulmonary Vasodilators
- •5.13 Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
- •5.14 Survivorship
- •References
- •6.1 Introduction/Epidemiology
- •6.2 Physiology
- •6.2.2 Physiology During COPD Exacerbation
- •6.4 Pharmacologic Treatment
- •6.4.1 Bronchodilators
- •6.4.1.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2 Glucocorticoid Therapy
- •6.4.2.1 Mechanism
- •6.4.2.4 Duration
- •6.4.3 Antimicrobials
- •6.4.3.1 Antibiotic Patient Selection
- •6.4.4.1 Nonpharmacologic Interventions
- •6.4.4.2 Opioids
- •6.4.4.3 Benzodiazepines
- •6.4.4.4 Dexmedetomidine
- •6.4.4.5 Ketamine
- •6.4.5 Adjunctive Therapies
- •6.4.5.1 Magnesium
- •6.4.5.3 Vitamin D
- •6.4.5.4 Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- •6.4.5.5 Smoking Cessation
- •6.4.5.6 Bowel Regimen
- •6.4.5.7 Mucolytics
- •6.4.5.8 Nutrition
- •6.4.5.9 Post-Discharge Adjuncts
- •6.5 ICU-Level Interventions
- •6.5.1 Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation
- •6.5.2 High-Flow Nasal Canula
- •6.5.3 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
- •6.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •7.1 Introduction
- •7.1.1 What Is Asthma?
- •7.2 Diagnosis
- •7.2.1 Physical Examination
- •7.2.2 Laboratory Data
- •7.2.3 Radiographic Findings
- •7.3.1 Standard-of-Care Therapy
- •7.3.3 Potential Adjunctive Therapies
- •7.3.3.1 Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICSs)
- •7.3.3.4 Intravenous (IV) Aminophylline
- •7.3.3.5 Intravenous (IV) Beta2-Agonists
- •7.3.3.6 Leukotriene Antagonists (LTRAs)
- •7.3.3.7 Intramuscular (IM) or IV Epinephrine
- •7.3.3.8 Inhaled Anesthetics
- •7.3.3.9 Inhaled Helium-Oxygen (Heliox)
- •7.3.3.10 Intravenous Ketamine
- •7.3.4.1 Subcutaneous (SC) Biologics
- •7.4.1 Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV)
- •7.4.2 Invasive Mechanical Ventilation (IMV)
- •7.6.1 Outpatient Follow-Up
- •7.7 Summary
- •References
- •8.1 Introduction
- •8.1.3.2 Anatomic Location
- •8.1.3.3 Chronicity
- •8.1.4 Clinical Presentation
- •8.1.4.1 Symptoms
- •8.1.4.2 Physician Examination
- •8.1.4.3 Cardiopulmonary Compromise
- •8.2.1.1 Clinical Pretest/Scores
- •8.2.1.2 D-Dimer-Level Interpretations
- •8.2.2 Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
- •8.2.3 Mortality Risk Assessment
- •8.2.3.1 PE Severity Index Score
- •8.2.3.2 Prognostic Indicators
- •8.3.2 High-Risk PE
- •8.4 Systemic Thrombolytic Therapy
- •8.4.1.1 High-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.2 Intermediate-Risk PE
- •8.4.1.3 Cardiac Arrest
- •8.5.2 Percutaneous Mechanical Interventions
- •8.5.2.2 Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis
- •8.5.3 Surgical Embolectomy
- •8.5.4 Mechanical Circulatory Support
- •8.6.1 PE Response Team (PERT)
- •8.6.3.1 Renal Dysfunction
- •8.6.3.4 Cancer
- •8.6.3.5 Treatment Failure
- •8.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •9.1.2 ECMO Outcomes
- •9.2 ECMO During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (eCPR)
- •9.2.1 Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal
- •9.3 ECMO Management
- •9.3.3 Fluid Management
- •9.4.1 Coagulation Changes
- •9.4.2 Transfusion Thresholds
- •9.4.3.1 Heparin
- •9.4.3.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •9.4.4 Monitoring Anticoagulation
- •9.6.2.1 Opioids
- •9.6.2.2 Ketamine
- •9.6.2.3 Propofol
- •9.6.2.4 Benzodiazepines
- •9.6.2.5 Dexmedetomidine
- •9.7.1 Aminoglycosides
- •9.7.2 Beta-Lactams
- •9.7.4 Antifungals
- •9.9 Other Complications
- •9.9.1 Bleeding
- •9.9.2 Thrombosis
- •9.9.3 Neurologic
- •9.10 Conclusion
- •References
- •10.1 Type 1–5 Myocardial Infarctions
- •10.2 Acute Coronary Syndrome (Type 1 MI)
- •10.3 Clinical Presentation/Evaluation
- •10.4 Non-pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5 Pharmacologic Therapy
- •10.5.1 Fibrinolytics
- •10.5.2 Anticoagulants
- •10.5.2.1 Heparins
- •10.5.2.2 Direct Thrombin Inhibitors
- •10.5.3 Antiplatelets
- •10.5.3.1 Aspirin
- •10.5.3.2 P2Y12 Inhibitors
- •Clopidogrel
- •Prasugrel
- •Ticagrelor
- •10.5.3.3 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors
- •10.5.3.4 Cangrelor
- •10.7 Long-Term Management
- •10.7.1 High Bleed Risk (HBR)
- •10.7.2 Statins
- •10.7.3 Beta-Blockers
- •10.7.5 Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
- •References
- •11.1 Introduction
- •11.2.2 What is Ejection Fraction?
- •11.4 Understanding Blood Pressure
- •11.5 Preload vs. Afterload
- •11.6 Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
- •11.6.2 Etiology
- •11.8 Treating Volume Overload
- •11.8.1 Loop Diuretics
- •11.9 Intravenous Vasodilators
- •11.10 Cardiogenic Shock
- •11.10.1 Inotrope Clinical Pearl
- •11.12 Digoxin
- •11.12.3 Loading Dose
- •11.12.4 Maintenance Dosing
- •11.12.5 Monitoring
- •11.12.7 Distribution
- •11.12.8 Drug-Drug Interactions
- •11.12.9 Digoxin Toxicity
- •11.13 ADHF Clinical Pearls
- •11.13.3 Avoid Phenylephrine
- •11.13.4 Use Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
- •11.14 Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy
- •11.15 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •11.16 Conclusion
- •References
- •12.1 Introduction
- •12.3 Diagnostic Findings
- •12.4.1 Oxygen Therapy
- •12.4.2 Pharmacological Management
- •12.4.3 Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS)
- •12.5 Pulmonary Hypertension
- •12.6 The Pharmacist’s Role
- •12.7 Conclusion
- •References
- •13.1 Introduction
- •13.2 Atrial Arrhythmias
- •13.2.2 Atrioventricular Blocks
- •13.2.3 Atrial Fibrillation
- •13.2.3.2 Anticoagulation
- •13.2.3.3 Rate vs. Rhythm Control
- •13.2.4 Atrial Flutter
- •13.2.5 Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)
- •13.3 Ventricular Arrhythmias
- •13.3.1 Premature Ventricular Complexes
- •13.3.2 Ventricular Tachycardia
- •13.3.2.1 Torsades de Pointes
- •13.3.3 Ventricular Fibrillation
- •13.3.4 Ventricular Arrhythmia Treatment Strategies
- •13.3.4.1 ICD Implantation
- •13.3.4.2 Pharmacologic Treatments
- •13.3.4.3 Catheter Ablation
- •13.4 Conclusion
- •References
- •14.1 Introduction
- •14.3.2 Laboratory Assessment
- •14.3.3 Imaging
- •14.3.4 Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring
- •14.4.1 Distributive
- •14.4.2 Cardiogenic
- •14.4.3 Hypovolemic
- •14.4.4 Obstructive
- •14.5 Management
- •14.6 Conclusion
- •References
- •15.1 Background
- •15.2 Diagnosis
- •15.3 Management
- •References
- •16.1 Introduction
- •16.3 Hemodynamics
- •16.5 Pharmacological Management
- •16.5.1 Hyperosmolar Therapy
- •16.5.3 Barbiturate Coma
- •16.6 Nonpharmacological Treatments
- •16.6.2 Temperature Management
- •16.6.3 Prophylactic Hypothermia
- •16.7 Adjunct Therapies
- •16.7.2 Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis
- •16.7.3 Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- •16.7.4 Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (SUP)
- •16.7.5 Tranexamic Acid
- •16.7.6 Glucose Targets
- •16.7.7 Steroids
- •16.8 Complications
- •16.8.1 Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
- •16.8.3 Central Fever
- •16.8.4.1 Diabetes Insipidus
- •16.8.4.3 Cerebral Salt Wasting Syndrome
- •16.9 Conclusion
- •References
- •17.1 Introductory Case
- •17.2 Introduction
- •17.4 Pathophysiology
- •17.5 Acute Therapies
- •17.5.1 Thrombolytic Therapy
- •17.5.2 Thrombectomy
- •17.5.3 Blood Pressure Management
- •17.5.4 Acute Anticoagulation
- •17.5.5 Antiplatelet Therapy
- •17.6 Early Complications
- •17.6.1 Hemorrhagic Conversion
- •17.6.2 Angioedema
- •17.6.3 Malignant Cerebral Edema
- •17.7 Secondary Prevention
- •References
- •18.1 Introduction
- •18.4 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- •18.5 Adverse Drug Effects
- •18.7 Anti-seizure Medications
- •18.7.1 Available Parenteral Preparations
- •18.7.1.1 Benzodiazepines: GABAA Receptor Activation
- •18.7.1.2 Other GABAergic Therapies
- •Barbiturates: GABAergic
- •Phenobarbital
- •Pentobarbital Infusion
- •Propofol Infusion: GABAergic
- •18.7.1.3 Second-Line Non-anesthetic ASMs
- •Levetiracetam: Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A Binding

8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
the outpatient or emergency department setting. Of all patients determined not to
have PE and did not receive treatment, only one patient developed VTE at 3months.
Importantly, the use of probability-adapted D-dimer thresholds resulted in 17.6%
less patients receiving chest imaging for PE workup compared to the traditional
threshold of <500ng/mL for low- or moderate-probability patients [50].
In the YEARS study, clinical pretest probability scoring with three of the original
Wells criteria (i.e., YEARS items)—(1) clinical signs of DVT, (2) hemoptysis, and
(3) PE is the most likely diagnosis—was applied to inpatients and outpatients with
suspected PE.PE was excluded if patients had zero YEARS criteria and D-dimer
<1000ng/mL or≥ 1 YEARS criteria and D-dimer <500ng/mL; otherwise, computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was pursued. Use of YEARS
criteria and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer resulted in a <1% risk of VTE at
3months and a 14% decrease in CTPA testing among patients of all ages compared
to the use of standard Wells criteria and D-dimer <500ng/mL [107].
Similarly, YEARS criteria and clinical probability-adapted D-dimer thresholds
were evaluated in pregnant women in the Artemis study. Compression ultrasonography evaluating for DVT was pursued if patients had no YEARS criteria and D-dimer
≥1000ng/mL or ≥1 YEARS criteria and D-dimer ≥500ng/mL.If DVT was not
identied on ultrasound, only then was CTPA pursued to minimize radiation exposure during pregnancy. This algorithm safely ruled out PE across all trimesters but
was most efcient in avoiding CTPA in patients who began the study during their
rst trimester [108].
Based on recent literature, it is reasonable to use an age or clinical probabilityadapted D-dimer threshold in conjunction with pretest probability scoring to guide
further workup for PE.
181
8.2.2 Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA)
CTPA is the gold standard for conrming the presence of PE.Intravenous radiopaque contrast allows for the visualization and detection of lling defects in the
pulmonary arteries on computed tomography. For patients with a low or intermediate probability of PE, guidelines suggest that a negative CTPA is adequate to exclude
PE.However, the negative predictive value is low for patients with high clinical
probability [59]. Figure 8.1 shows lling defects (pulmonary thromboemboli) in
bilateral pulmonary arteries, which are consistent with acute PE.
8.2.3 Mortality Risk Assessment
Risk factors for PE-associated morbidity and mortality were poorly understood
until the publication of the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry
(ICOPER) data from 2110 patients with proven PE in 1999. Overall, 4.2% of

182
Fig. 8.1 CTPA
demonstrating lling
defects (pulmonary
thromboemboli) in
bilateral pulmonary
arteries consistent with
acute PE. CTPA computed
tomography pulmonary
angiography
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
patients presented with hemodynamic instability. However, the presence of hemodynamic instability (SBP <90mmHg) at presentation was associated with a higher
mortality at 3months (58.3%) compared to those who were hemodynamically stable (15.1%). Multiple-regression modeling demonstrated that age over 70years,
cancer, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, systolic
arterial hypotension, tachypnea, and right ventricular hypokinesis on echocardiography were signicant indicators of poor prognosis [35]. Findings from this registry
shaped future studies seeking to identify risk factors for high-risk PE.
8.2.3.1 PE Severity Index Score
The pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) score is the most validated clinical
score for risk stratication of patients presenting with PE (Table8.4). It was derived
from a study of over 15,000 patients at 186 Pennsylvania hospitals to predict 30-day
mortality in PE and then validated in a European study of 221 inpatients with
PE.Patients who did not meet any PESI criteria were considered low-risk PE and
found to have 30-day mortality rates of 1.5% or less [4]. Another study found 90-day
mortality using the original score in low-risk patients (classes I–II) to be 1.1% compared with 11.1% in moderate- to very-high-risk patients (risk classes III–V).
Ultimately, the score was simplied, and the RIETE validation cohort demonstrated a
1.1% 30-day mortality in the low-risk group versus 8.9% in the high-risk group [45].
Overall, the PESI score has a 99% negative predictive value and is a useful tool to
identify patients at low risk of death who may be managed as an outpatient for PE [24].
8.2.3.2 Prognostic Indicators
While anticoagulation is the rst-line treatment for hemodynamically stable patients
with PE, patients demonstrating poor prognostic indicators may require thrombolytic therapy or surgical or mechanical thrombectomy. Review of prognostic

Acute Pulmonary Embolism
8
Table 8.4 Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score [10]
Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Score
Parameters Original Simplied
Age Age in years 1 point (if age
Altered mental status +60 points –
Arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation
<90%
Cancer +30 points 1 point
Chronic heart failure +10 points 1 point
Chronic pulmonary disease +10 points –
Male sex +10 points
Pulse rate ≥110 beats/minute +20 points 1 point
Respiratory rate >30/min +20 points –
Systolic BP <100mm Hg +30 points 1 point
Temperature <36°C +20 points –
Interpretation
Risk Stratication 30-day mortality
Low risk Class I: ≤65 points
Moderate risk
High risk
Very high risk
+20 points 1 point
(0%–1.6%)
Class II: 66–85 points
(1.7%–3.5%)
Class III: 86–105 points
(3.2%–7.1%)
Class IV:106–125 points
(4%–11.4%)
Class V: >125 points
(10%–24.5%)
>80years)
0 points (1%)
≥1 point (10.9%)
183
indicators is especially important for those with intermediate-risk PE since evidence
of RV dysfunction or cardiac ischemia portends an increased risk of mortality and
may necessitate a higher level of care or additional intervention. Pharmacists should
be familiar with poor prognostic indicators.
Transthoracic echocardiography of the RV may detect changes in ventricular
function caused by acute pressure overload from PE.Findings consistent with RV
dysfunction include right ventricular hypokinesis and dilatation, interventricular
septal attening and paradoxical motion toward the left ventricle, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension, and loss of inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena
cava [10]. These ndings of acute PE without right ventricular dysfunction on
CTPA are shown in Fig.8.2.
Patients presenting with acute PE and RV/LV diameter ratio of 1 or greater and
tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) less than 16mm are at increased
risk of 30-day PE-related mortality or need for rescue thrombolysis, even if they are
initially hemodynamically stable [59, 85]. Similarly, an RV/LV diameter ratio of 0.9
or greater on CTPA is associated with a vefold increased risk for PE-related mortality or clinical deterioration [8, 70]. Figure 8.3 demonstrates these ndings of
acute PE causing right ventricular dysfunction on CTPA.

184
Fig. 8.2 CTPA of acute
pulmonary embolism
without right ventricular
dysfunction. Note: RV/LV
diameter ratio <1. CTPA
computed tomography
pulmonary angiography;
RV/LV right ventricular to
left ventricular ratio
Fig. 8.3 CTPA of acute
pulmonary embolism with
right ventricular
dysfunction. Note: RV/LV
diameter ratio >1; Same
patient from Fig.8.2 after
presenting with recurrent,
high risk PE. CTPA
computed tomography
pulmonary angiography,
RV/LV right ventricular to
left ventricular ratio
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are markers of RV dilatation in PE.A meta-analysis of 1132 patients
with acute PE demonstrated that BNP or NT-proBNP elevations were associated with
nearly sevenfold increases in complicated hospital course or 30-day mortality [55].
High-risk electrocardiographic (ECG) ndings may represent RV dysfunction in
PE [48]. While the most common ECG changes in acute PE include tachycardia,
T-wave inversion in lead V1, and ST elevation in lead aVR, the following ndings
are predictors of hemodynamic collapse and 30-day mortality: heart rate above 100
beats/minute, S1Q3T3 pattern, complete right bundle branch block, inverted T waves
in V1-V4, ST elevation in aVR, and atrial brillation [93].
In the setting of PE, troponin elevations represent myocardial injury due to RV
overload and are associated with increased risk for short-term, PE-related mortality,
and serious adverse events even in hemodynamically stable patients [6, 10]. Since

Acute Pulmonary Embolism
8
185
Table 8.5 Pulmonary embolism classication based on prognostic indicators [10, 48, 59]
Hemodynamic instability RV dysfunction Myocardial injury
Cardiac arrest
Obstructive shock
Systolic BP<90mm Hg
Vasopressors required to
achieve systolic
BP≥90mm Hg with
evidence of end-organ
hypoperfusion
Persistent hypotension
Systolic BP<90mm Hg
or a systolic BP drop
≥40mm Hg for >15min
not from another cause
RV dilatation
Apical four-chamber
RV/LV diameter of ≥1
on CTPA or TTE.
Elevation of
BNP>90pg/mL or
N-terminal prohormone
BNP>500pg/mL
ECG ndings
HR>100 beats/minute
S
pattern
1Q3T3
Complete right bundle
branch block
Troponin T
>0.1ng/mL
High sensitivity
troponin T
<75years old:
≥ 14pg/mL
≥75years old:
≥ 45pg/mL
Tropnin I
>0.4ng/mL
Inverted T waves in
V
1–V4
ST elevation in aVR
Atrial brillation
High risk Present Present Present
Comment: Troponin
measurement not
required if hemodynamic instability or
V dysfunction
R
Intermediate
risk
High risk
– Present Present
features
Low risk
– ≤1 indicator present
features
Low risk – – –
BNP brain naturietic peptide, BP blood pressure, CTPA computed tomography pulmonary angiography, ECG electrocardiogram, HR heart rate, LV left ventricle, PESI Pulmonary Embolism
Severity Index, RV right ventricle, sPESI Simplied Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, TTE
transthoracic echocardiogram
Adapted with permission from: Konstantinides etal. [59]
a
Cardiac arrest, obstructive shock (systolic BP <90mm Hg or vasopressors required to achieve
systolic BP ≥90mm Hg, with end-organ hypoperfusion), or persistent hypotension (systolic BP
<90mm Hg or a systolic BP drop ≥40mm Hg for >15min) not from another cause
b
If hemodynamic instability plus CTPA-conrmed PE and/or evidence of RV dysfunction on TTE
are seen, neither PESI calculation nor troponin measurement are additionally required to classify
high-risk PE
c
Signs of RV dysfunction or elevated cardiac biomarker levels may be present, despite a calculated
PESI I-II or sPESI of zero. Current guidelines recommend classication into the intermediate-risk
category
age and renal function impact levels, age-adjusted cutoffs for high-sensitivity troponin T are useful to identify patients who may benet from additional monitoring
and/or early reperfusion therapy [46].
Evaluation of prognostic indicators in conjunction with PESI scoring forms the
basis of PE classication, as outlined in Table8.5.

186
8.3 Initial Management per Risk Stratication
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
8.3.1
Initial
Management
Patients with a high or intermediate clinical probability of PE should be initiated on
anticoagulation without delay while the workup is in progress [59]. The pharmacist
clinician should work with the treatment team to guide initial management, including the choice of anticoagulant as well as supportive care based on the patient’s risk
stratication (Table8.6).
8.3.1.1
w-Risk PE
Lo
Patients presenting to the ED with low-risk PE have a lower rate of 30-day mortality, and appropriateness for early discharge should be assessed. Advanced interventions such as reperfusion therapy or surgery are not routinely performed for low-risk
Table 8.6 Treatment considerations based on the severity of PE
PE
Classication Care Site Anticoagulation
Low risk Early
Intermediate-
lo
w risk
Intermediate-
high risk
High risk Hospitalize;
AC anticoagulation, LMWH low molecular weight heparin, OAC oral anticoagulation, UFH
unfractionated heparin
discharge for
eligible
patients
Hospitalize Oral AC or parenteral
Hospitalize
with close
monitoring
admit to a
critical care
unit
Rapid anticoagulation
with an oral AC (e.g.,
apixaban or
rivaroxaban) is
preferred over
parenteral AC; Certain
OAC will require initial
treatment with a
parenteral AC
AC (LMWH or
fondaparinux preferred)
Parenteral AC (consider
UFH if concern for
hemodynamic
decompensation)
Parenteral AC (e.g.,
UFH)
Reperfusion
Therapies Considerations
Not routinely
recommended
Not routinely
recommended
Not routinely
recommended
however may be
benecial in
severe cases
Consider
immediate
reperfusion
therapies
Patients with
adequate family/
social support and
easy access to
medication without
other reason for
hospitalization can be
considered for early
discharge
Consider other
patient/disease
factors when
determining oral vs
parenteral AC
Monitor closely for
clinical deterioration
refractory to standard
anticoagulation
Provide supportive
care (oxygen,
hemodynamic
optimization,
mechanical
circulatory support)
in addition to
reperfusion therapy

8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
187
PE.Home treatment may be appropriate for patients with a low risk of PE-related
death, no serious comorbidities or concomitant conditions requiring hospitalization,
and no barriers to compliance with outpatient treatment. The pharmacist clinician is
poised to provide anticoagulation counseling, address patient questions, and relay
signs and symptoms that would warrant re-presentation back to the ED.
For patients appropriate to receive home treatment, rapid anticoagulation with a
direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is preferred over inpatient treatment with 5days
of a parenteral anticoagulant [59, 99]. Notably, certain oral anticoagulants including
dabigatran and edoxaban require initial treatment with a parenteral anticoagulation
for a minimum of 5days prior to transitioning to the oral agent. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin require an overlap with a parenteral anticoagulant
upon initiation until a therapeutic INR between 2.0 and 3.0 is achieved, typically for
a minimum of 5days. In contrast, apixaban and rivaroxaban can be initiated immediately following the PE diagnosis as the sole agent. Apixaban and rivaroxaban
require higher initial doses when initiating upon diagnosis of a PE according to the
FDA-approved package insert, for 7 and 21 days, respectively [59, 77, 99]. The
choice of oral anticoagulant depends on patient-specic factors such as renal function, affordability, drug-drug interactions, and other comorbidities such as antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Frequency of dosing (e.g., once daily or twice daily)
is an important factor for patients with concern for medication compliance. For a
patient who otherwise has no contraindications, the use of a DOAC is preferred over
vitamin K antagonists (VKA) [77]. Additional considerations for oral anticoagulants are listed in Table8.7.
Table 8.8 outlines the initiation and maintenance phases of each oral anticoagulant. Patients not eligible for rapid anticoagulation with apixaban or rivaroxaban
will require initial management with a parenteral anticoagulant. Subcutaneous
injections of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux can be
administered at home with appropriate patient education. The choice of anticoagulant for specic populations, such as those experiencing pregnancy or cancer, is
discussed further in forthcoming sections.
Patient access to medical care and social support must be considered prior to
discharge to ensure proper outpatient care and anticoagulant treatment [59]. Patients
with a history of poor compliance or those who cannot afford medications are not
ideal candidates for early discharge during the acute phase of PE [77].
8.3.1.2
Intermediate-Risk
PE
PE is categorized as an intermediate risk if a patient presents with clinical signs of
severe PE without evidence of hemodynamic instability such as cardiac arrest or
hypotension. Patients are stratied as having intermediate-risk PE if meeting the
criteria for PESI class III–V or sPESI ≥1 or if there is evidence of RV dysfunction
and/or myocardial injury. Patients in the intermediate-risk category are not candidates for early discharge home treatment, and hospitalization for close monitoring
is recommended. The initial management of intermediate-risk PE also includes

188
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Use in Renal Dysfunction
(ESRD, CrCl <30ml/min)
Routine Dose
Monitoring Major Drug Interactions
Maintenance Dose
Frequency per Day
*
✓
dietary interactions
Can initiate
Table 8.7 Considerations and characteristics of oral AC
immediately on
diagnosis
Requires initial
parenteral AC
Rivaroxaban ✓ Once CYP3A4
Factor Xa Inhibitors
Apixaban ✓ Twice CYP3A4 ✓
Medication
Edoxaban ✓ Once P-glycoprotein ✓
Direct Thrombin Inhibitor
Vitamin K Antagonist
Warfarin ✓ ✓ Once ✓ Multiple CYP450 and
Dabigatran ✓ Twice P-glycoprotein
*
Edoxaban may not be ideal for VTE treatment in patients with CrCl >95ml/min

8 Acute Pulmonary Embolism
Table 8.8 Initiation and maintenance dosing of oral anticoagulants for the treatment of PE
Medication Initiation phase Maintenance phase
Apixaban 10mg twice daily for 7days upon diagnosis of PE 5mg twice daily
Rivaroxaban 15mg twice daily for 21days upon diagnosis of PE 20mg once daily with
Edoxaban Requires 5–10days of parenteral anticoagulation
prior to initiation
Dabigatran Requires 5–10days of parenteral anticoagulation
prior to initiation
Warfarin Requires overlap with a parenteral anticoagulation
upon initiation until therapeutic INR is achieved
(typically for 5days)
meals
60mg once daily
150mg twice daily
Patient-specic dose to
maintain INR between 2
and 3
189
anticoagulation without delay while the workup is in progress. However, pharmacist
clinicians should work with the care team to anticipate the risk for decompensation
or need for intervention as this will impact the choice of initial anticoagulation.
Patients with intermediate-risk PE can be further categorized as intermediatelow risk if they do not have both RV dysfunction and myocardial injury. They may
be treated with either a parenteral anticoagulant or a rapid-acting oral anticoagulant
similar to the management of low-risk PE.If a parenteral agent is chosen, LMWH
or fondaparinux is recommended over the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH).
LMWH and fondaparinux can be given subcutaneously, whereas UFH is administered as a continuous intravenous infusion. UFH requires close monitoring of anti Xa activity to ensure therapeutic levels and carry a higher risk of bleeding and
heparin-induced thrombocytopenia [59, 77, 99]. However, individual patient factors
and pharmacokinetics of each agent should be considered when choosing a parenteral anticoagulant. For example, UFH may be preferred in patients with renal dysfunction or in certain situations where a shorter acting, quickly reversible agent is
optimal.
PE is classied as an intermediate-high risk if both RV dysfunction and myocardial injury are present. Patients with intermediate-high risk are at a higher risk of
progressive hemodynamic decompensation. Even though routine thrombolytic use
is not recommended to all patients in this category, reperfusion therapies may be
benecial, particularly in the setting of elevated lactate ≥2mmol/L, elevated BNP,
elevated shock index (HR/SBP) >1, or concomitant DVT [39]. In patients who are
likely to receive systemic thrombolysis, it may be prudent to administer intravenous
UFH infusion given its shorter half-life compared to subcutaneous injections. UFH
should target factor Xa inhibition of 0.3–0.7units/mL [72]. Additionally, subcutaneous anticoagulants such as LMWH or fondaparinux may not have reliable absorption in the setting of hypoperfusion [48, 59, 77]. The route, dose, and additional
considerations for each parenteral anticoagulant are described in Table8.9.

190
S. K. Kim and L. A. Igneri
Table 8.9 Parenteral anticoagulants for the treatment of PE in adults [20, 32, 114]
Medication Route Dose
Dosing Weight
Considerations
Dose
Adjustment Consideration
Unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins
UFH IV 80units/kg IV
bolus followed
by 18units/
kg/h infusion
Use actual
body weight;
consider lower
doses in
patients with
obesity
Titrate to
therapeutic
aPTT (1.5–2.5
times control) or
anti-factor Xa
(0.3–0.7units/
mL) according
to institutional
Preferred in patients
with hemodynamic
instability or renal
dysfunction;
monitor for heparin
resistance or
heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia
protocol
Dalteparin SC 200units/kg
every 24h
100units/kg
twice daily
Use actual
body weight to
a maximum of
190kg
Routine
monitoring of
anti-factor Xa is
not performed
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis or CrCl
<30mL/min
however may be
considered in
patients with
high risk of
bleeding or
≥150kg
Enoxaparin SC 1mg/kg twice
daily
1.5mg/kg
every 24h
CrCl <30mL/
min: 1mg/kg
every 24h
Use actual
body weight;
consider lower
doses in
patients with
*
obesity
Routine
monitoring of
anti-factor Xa is
not performed
however may be
considered in
patients with
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis
high risk of
bleeding or
≥150kg
Tinzaparin SC 175 anti-Xa
units/kg every
24h
Use actual
body weight; a
xed upper
dose limit is
not
recommended
Routine
monitoring of
anti-factor Xa is
not performed
however may be
considered in
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis or CrCl
<20mL/min
patients with
high risk of
bleeding, CrCl
20–<30mL/
min, or obesity
Factor Xa inhibitor (indirect thrombin inhibitor)
Fondaparinux SC <50kg: 5mg
every 24h
50–100kg:
7.5mg every
24h
Limited data
available in
patients with
BMI >45kg/m
or >150kg
Routine
monitoring of
anti-factor Xa is
2
not performed
Not recommended
in patients on
dialysis or CrCl
<30mL/min
>100kg: 10mg
every 24h
(continued)
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
