Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
204
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Halbwachs et al.
Fig. 13.12 A 12-lead ECG recorded after the ablation procedure showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 75bpm; QRS axis at 20°; Q waves in leads II, III, and
Commentary
The present case illustrates a RF catheter ablation procedure of an electrical storm in a 77-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a prior history of remote inferior myocardial infarction. Several observations can be made about the present case.
Electrical storm is dened by the presence of three or more sustained episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular brillation/appropriate ICD shocks within a period of 24h. Its incidence varies between 4 and 20% of ICD recipients [1,
2]. It is an important cause of sudden cardiac
death, which raises a lot of therapeutic chal­lenges, mostly related to the severity of the arrhythmia, the underlying heart disease, and the patient’s comorbidities. The ventricular arrhyth­mias responsible for electrical storm are repre­sented by monomorphic VT in 86–97% of patients, followed by ventricular brillation in 1–21% of patients, mixed (VT/VF) in 3–14% of cases, and polymorphic VT in 2–8% of cases.
aVF compatible with remote inferior wall necrosis; at­tened T waves In leads II, III, and aVF; negative T waves in leads V5 and V6
Electrical storm can arise in patients with a chronic condition such as myocardial scar in patients with previous myocardial infarction with a superposed trigger and in patients with primary cardiac inherited arrhythmia syndromes (such as the Brugada syndrome), or it can arise in an acute, reversible context, such as acute myocar­dial ischemia, acutely decompensated heart fail­ure, electrolyte abnormalities (hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia), drug toxicity/overdose (including anti-arrhythmic drugs), sepsis, or thyrotoxicosis.
Several decisional and therapeutic algorithms have been proposed for the management of patients with electrical storm [35]. Catheter ablation is an efcient technique for the treat­ment of VT storm in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy [6, 7]. It is associated with elimination of VT episodes in up to 89% of patients (number of catheter ablation procedures needed between 1 and 3) and substan­tially reduces the number of ICD discharges dur­ing follow-up in survivors, with 66% of patients
13 C ase 13
https://t.me/medicina_free
205
being free from VT recurrence after a median follow-up period of 22months [6].
In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and remote myocardial infarction, the most common form of ventricular arrhythmia is sustained monomorphic VT [5]. This usually originates in a zone of myocardial scar or in a borderline zone between the myocardial scar and normal myocar­dial tissue. Therefore, identication of the myo­cardial scar during the pre-ablation phase is essential, in order to orient the cardiac electro­physiologist regarding the ablation strategy. This can be done before the beginning of the ablation procedure, using transthoracic 3D contrast­enhanced echocardiography to identify zones of akinesia [8], multidetector cardiac computed tomography [9], nuclear techniques [10], and cardiac MRI [1115], the latter being able to show areas of late gadolinium enhancement, which are reliable markers of myocardial scar. During the ablation procedure, this can be done with the use of intracardiac echography [16] and with electro-anatomical mapping systems, which allow the creation of bipolar voltage maps, able to differentiate healthy myocardium from myo­cardial scar [17]. It is widely accepted that dense myocardial scar corresponds to areas of very low bipolar voltage (conventionally dened as 0.5mV), normal myocardial tissue to areas of voltage >1.5mV, and borderline areas to values between 0.5mV and 1.5mV [1821]. Creation of high-density maps with the use of multipolar electrodes (such as the Pentaray catheter) has become the current standard [17]. For the above­presented patient, this is illustrated in Fig.13.6. The low-voltage area represented 22% of the entire surface of the LV, compatible with a large myocardial scar. The origin of VT was subse­quently looked for in this area and in the regions adjacent to it. This was done by performing acti­vation mapping.
Activation mapping using a multielectrode diagnostic catheter and an electro-anatomical mapping system are the method of choice for identication of the VT circuit [2224]. However, this method is not feasible in cases of fast VTs
with hemodynamic compromise or in cases when the VT is not inducible during programmed ven­tricular stimulation. In all other cases, this is the preferred method for tachycardia mapping, given its high potential in describing the arrhythmia mechanism (macro-reentry or focal) and in iden­tifying the main components of the VT (see Figs.13.7 and 13.8). Additional techniques, such as entrainment mapping, pacemap during sinus rhythm, and mapping of late potentials, should be used as complements to activation mapping in order to conrm the abovementioned ndings. In the above-presented patient, the activation map demonstrated the presence of a macro-reentry circuit at the level of the infero-septal LV, with a double-loop activation pattern, the VT isthmus being situated in a borderline zone between the dense myocardial scar and the healthy myocar­dium (see Fig.13.8).
Conrmation of the localization of the VT cir­cuit was subsequently done by creating a pace­map. For a detailed discussion about the technique used for identication of the critical VT compo­nents (exit zone, entrance zone, and VT isthmus) using pacing during sinus rhythm, as originally described by de Chillou etal. [25], see the com­mentary section of cases 14, 16, 18, and 19.
Ablation of the VT isthmus plus ablation of LAVA was successfully performed, and the patient remains tachycardia-free 2years after the ablation procedure.
Learning Points
• Catheter ablation is an important option in the treatment of electrical storm.
• The bipolar voltage map performed dur­ing sinus rhythm offers important infor­mation about the substrate of ischemic VT, due to its capability of identifying myocardial scar.
• Performing activation mapping during VT is the option of choice for ablation guidance, provided that the VT is hemo­dynamically well tolerated.
206
https://t.me/medicina_free
• In cases where activation mapping can­not be performed, pacemapping during sinus rhythm can identify the critical components of the VT (exit zone, entrance zone, and VT isthmus). This allows efcient catheter ablation, espe­cially in patients for whom the VT is not inducible during the ablation procedure.
References
1. Sesselberg HW, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Daubert JP, Andrews ML, etal. Ventricular arrhythmia storms in postinfarction patients with implantable debrilla­tors for primary prevention indications: a MADIT-II substudy. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(11):1395–402.
2. Emkanjoo Z, Alihasani N, Alizadeh A, Tayyebi M, Bonakdar H, Barakpour H, etal. Electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-debrillators: can it be forecast? Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(6):563–7.
3. AlKalbani A, AlRawahi N. Management of mono­morphic ventricular tachycardia electrical storm in structural heart disease. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2019;31(3):135–44.
4. El-Sherif N.The challenge of management of electri­cal storm and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cardiol J. 2007;14(4):326–8.
5. Eiing M, Razavi M, Massumi A. The evaluation and management of electrical storm. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(2):111–21.
6. Carbucicchio C, Santamaria M, Trevisi N, Maccabelli G, Giraldi F, Fassini G, etal. Catheter ablation for the treatment of electrical storm in patients with implant­able cardioverter-debrillators: short- and long­term outcomes in a prospective single-center study. Circulation. 2008;117(4):462–9.
7. Arya A, Bode K, Piorkowski C, Bollmann A, Sommer P, Gaspar T, et al. Catheter ablation of electrical storm due to monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: acute results and its effect on long-term survival. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010;33(12):1504–9.
8. Montant P, Chenot F, Gofnet C, Poncelet A, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, etal. Detection and quan­tication of myocardial scars by contrast-enhanced 3D echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(4):415–23.
9. Komatsu Y, Cochet H, Jadidi A, Sacher F, Shah A, Derval N, et al. Regional myocardial wall thinning at multidetector computed tomography correlates to arrhythmogenic substrate in postinfarction ven-
F. Halbwachs et al.
tricular tachycardia: assessment of structural and electrical substrate. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):342–50.
10. Matsunari I, Taki J, Nakajima K, Tonami N, Hisada K. Myocardial viability assessment using nuclear imaging. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17(3):169–79.
11. Alcaine A, Jauregui B, Soto-Iglesias D, Acosta J, Penela D, Fernandez-Armenta J, et al. Automatic detection of slow conducting channels during sub­strate ablation of scar-related ventricular arrhythmias. J Interv Cardiol. 2020;2020:4386841.
12. Andreu D, Penela D, Acosta J, Fernandez-Armenta J, Perea RJ, Soto-Iglesias D, et al. Cardiac mag­netic resonance-aided scar dechanneling: inuence on acute and long-term outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(8):1121–8.
13. Jauregui B, Soto-Iglesias D, Zucchelli G, Penela D, Ordonez A, Teres C, et al. Arrhythmogenic substrate detection in chronic ischaemic patients undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation using multidetec­tor cardiac computed tomography: compared evalu­ation with cardiac magnetic resonance. Europace. 2020;23(1):82.
14. Roca-Luque I, Van Breukelen A, Alarcon F, Garre P, Tolosana JM, Borras R, etal. Ventricular scar channel entrances identied by new wideband cardiac mag­netic resonance sequence to guide ventricular tachy­cardia ablation in patients with cardiac debrillators. Europace. 2020;22(4):598–606.
15. Soto-Iglesias D, Penela D, Jauregui B, Acosta J, Fernandez-Armenta J, Linhart M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided ventricular tachycar­dia substrate ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(4):436–47.
16. Hussein A, Jimenez A, Ahmad G, Mesubi O, Klein T, Gurm G, etal. Assessment of ventricular tachycar­dia scar substrate by intracardiac echocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(4):412–21.
17. Tschabrunn CM, Roujol S, Dorman NC, Nezafat R, Josephson ME, Anter E.High-resolution mapping of ventricular scar: comparison between single and mul­tielectrode catheters. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9(6):e003841.
18. Vergara P, Roque C, Oloriz T, Mazzone P, Della BP.Substrate mapping strategies for successful abla­tion of ventricular tachycardia: a review. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2013;83(2):104–11.
19. Cano O, Hutchinson M, Lin D, Garcia F, Zado E, Bala R, etal. Electroanatomic substrate and ablation out­come for suspected epicardial ventricular tachycardia in left ventricular nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(9):799–808.
20. de Chillou C, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, Sacher F, Groben L, Abdelaal A, et al. Showing up chan­nels for postinfarct ventricular tachycardia ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(7):897–904.
21. Hsia HH, Lin D, Sauer WH, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Anatomic characterization of endocardial sub­strate for hemodynamically stable reentrant ventricular
13 C ase 13
https://t.me/medicina_free
207
tachycardia: identication of endocardial conducting channels. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3(5):503–12.
22. Waspe LE, Brodman R, Kim SG, Matos JA, Johnston DR, Scavin GM, etal. Activation mapping in patients with coronary artery disease with multiple ventricular tachycardia congurations: occurrence and therapeu­tic implications of widely separate apparent sites of origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5(5):1075–86.
23. Dixit S, Callans DJ.Mapping for ventricular tachy­cardia. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2002;6(4):436–41.
24. Pandozi C, Lavalle C, Russo M, Galeazzi M, Ficili S, Malacrida M, etal. Mapping of ventricular tachy­cardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: cur­rent approaches and future perspectives. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42(10):1041–50.
25. de Chillou C, Groben L, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, MagdiAbbas M, Zhang N, et al. Localizing the critical isthmus of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia: the value of pace-mapping during sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):175–81.
Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
RonanLe Bouar, FrédéricHalbwachs, MatthieuGeorge, DidierBresson, JacquesLevy, CrinaMuresan, SerbanSchiau, andCharlineDaval
14
Case Presentation
A 69-year-old male patient with a past medical history of coronary artery disease (chronic total occlusion of the RCA); remote inferior myocar­dial infarction at the age of 49years treated with best medical therapy; recurrent sustained mono­morphic ventricular tachycardia treated with ICD implantation, complicated by ICD pocket infec­tion treated with ICD removal and reimplantation of the ICD in the right subclavian region at the age of 52years; chronic obliterative arterial dis­ease of the lower limbs treated by unilateral (left) aortofemoral bypass surgery; gout; and hyperthy­roidism secondary to amiodarone administration was addressed to the cardiology department for two electrical discharges from his ICD 2h prior to his admittance to the hospital, which obliged him to seek immediate medical care.
His cardiovascular risk factors were repre­sented by age (> 55 years old), smoking (40 pack-years), arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia,
R. Le Bouar (*) · D. Bresson · J. Levy · C. Muresan S. Schiau · C. Daval Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr;
didier.bresson@ghrmsa.fr; levyj@ghrmsa.fr; crina.muresan@ghrmsa.fr; serban.schiau@ghrmsa.fr; charline.daval@ghrmsa.fr
F. Halbwachs · M. George Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France
grade 1 overweight, and a family history of early atherosclerosis. His medication at home con­sisted of atorvastatin 20 mg, bisoprolol 5 mg, aspirin 75 mg, valsartan 80 mg, esomeprazole 20mg, and febuxostat 80mg.
At physical examination, his blood pressure was 123/63 mmHg, HR 67 bpm, H = 167 cm, W=80kg, and BMI of 28.68kg/m2, heart sounds were regular, there were no cardiovascular mur­murs, lung auscultation was clear, peripheral pulses were perceptible, and there were no signs of right heart failure.
His blood workup showed a Hb level of
14.0 g/dL, leukocytes 8.08 × 109/L, platelets 194×109/L, CRP 2mg/L, BUN 6.5mmol/L, cre­atinine 82 μmol/L, glycemia 6.2 mmol/L, Na+141mmol/L, K+ 4.5mmol/L, NT pro-BNP 571 pg/mL, troponin 0.089 ng/mL (NV<0.042ng/mL), AST 18IU/L, ALT 42IU/L, GGT 172IU/L, and proteins 62g/L.
His ECG is presented in Fig.14.1.
Telemetry recording during hospitalization documented episodes of a wide QRS complex tachycardia (Fig.14.2).
A 12-lead ECG was recorded during an epi­sode of palpitations while in hospital (Fig.14.3). Of note, the morphology of the PVC recorded in limb leads in Fig.14.3 is very similar to the mor­phology of the wide QRS complex tachycardia from the telemetry tracing presented in Fig.14.2, and lead V1 shows morphology of RBBB in both Figs.14.2 and 14.3. It is therefore likely that the
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_14
209
210
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 14.1 A 12-lead ECG showing sinus rhythm; heart rate of 75bpm; QRS axis at 30°; Q waves in leads II, III, and aVF, compatible with remote inferior wall necrosis;
initial R wave in V1 suggestive of remote lateral wall necrosis [1]; and negative T waves in V5, V6, lead I, and aVL suggesting lateral ischemia
Fig. 14.2 Telemetry tracing (leads I, II, III, V1, aVR, aVL, aVF) showing initiation of a wide QRS complex tachycardia with a heart rate of 180 bpm, right bundle
branch block, and inferior axis; P wave is best visible in lead V1, with a 1:1 AV relationship
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 14.3 A 12-lead ECG with the limb leads showing sinus rhythm with ventricular trigeminy, followed by a wide complex QRS tachycardia with a heart rate of 188bpm and RBBB aspect
211
tachycardias presented in Fig. 14.2 and in Fig.14.3 are episodes of the same tachycardia.
Question 1: What is the nature of the tachycardia from Fig. 14.3?
A. Antidromic tachycardia B. AVNRT with RBBB C. 2:1 atrial utter with RBBB D. AVRT with RBBB E. Ventricular tachycardia
Figure 14.3 explained. A 12-lead ECG with the limb leads showing sinus rhythm with ven­tricular trigeminy, followed by a wide complex QRS tachycardia with a heart rate of 188 bpm and RBBB aspect. The aspect in lead V1 (R wave taller than R’ wave) and the ratio of r/S<1in V6 suggest the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia
Transthoracic echocardiography showed a non-dilated LV (EDD of 51mm), with akinesia of the inferior and lateral wall, with moderate
systolic dysfunction, a LVEF of 40% (Simpson biplane method) (Fig.14.4). There was also type 1 diastolic dysfunction; the LV lling pressure was within normal range; there was mild left atrial dilation (LA area of 21cm2) and mild mitral regurgitation by restriction of the posterior mitral leaet; the cardiac index was 1.52L/min/m2; the right ventricle was non-dilated; there was mild tricuspid regurgitation, with sPAP of 28mmHg, absence of pulmonary hypertension, and absence of pericardial uid. The ventricular electrode of the ICD was visible inside the right ventricle, inserting in the region of the RV apex.
His chest X-ray is presented in Fig.14.5.
In order to rule out ongoing myocardial isch­emia, coronary angiography was performed, which demonstrated chronic occlusion of the right coronary artery (Fig. 14.6), with no acute atherosclerotic lesion, an aspect similar to his coronary angiography performed 3years prior.
ICD interrogation (Medtronic Evera VR) revealed the presence of 104 episodes of mono­morphic ventricular tachycardia with a cycle length of 310bpm during the 4months prior to
212
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 14.4 Left upper panel: M-mode echocardiography showing a non-dilated left ventricle (end-diastolic diame­ter of 51mm) with moderately reduced LV EF% of 42%. Right panel upper: LV EF% quantied by Simpson biplane method at 39.88%, compatible with moderate sys­tolic dysfunction. Left lower panel: pulsed Doppler inter-
Fig. 14.5 Chest X-ray in anteroposterior projection showing an enlarged cardiac silhouette with an increased cardiothoracic index. The ICD is visible in the right subclavian region, with the distal end of the ventricular lead visible at the level of the right ventricular apex. The sternal wires post-sternotomy are also visible. The proximal coil of the abandoned ICD lead is visible in the left innominate vein, entering the SVC.The distal part of the old ICD lead had been removed
rogation of the transmitral ux showing an E/A ratio<1, with a E wave deceleration time>200ms, in favor of type 1 diastolic dysfunction. Right lower panel: Apical four­chamber view showing a mildly dilated left atrium, with a surface of 21.5cm
2
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
213
Fig. 14.6 Left panel: angiography image of the left cor- onary artery showing no major obstruction of the epicar­dial vessel. The coil of the ventricular electrode of the ICD is also visible, inserting in the apical region of the right ventricle. The sternal wires post-sternotomy are vis­ible in the upper left side of the image. Right panel:
his admittance to the hospital, efciently treated with burst pacing by the ICD, 99 episodes of sus­tained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in the “monitor-only” zone, and two episodes of sustained monomorphic VT treated with electri­cal cardioversion (35 Joules) after failed burst ventricular pacing, corresponding to the electri­cal discharges felt by the patient the day of his admittance to the hospital.
Given the high number of episodes of ventric­ular tachycardia that the patient experienced dur­ing the 4months prior to his hospital admittance that lately required internal cardioversion for termination, an electrophysiological study in view of a catheter ablation procedure was scheduled.
Electrophysiological Study andRF Catheter Ablation Procedure
The ablation procedure was performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Vascular access was obtained using the modied Seldinger
chronic obstruction of the epicardial right coronary artery in its proximal segment (red arrow). The coil of the ven­tricular electrode of the ICD is visible in the inferior right part of the image. The sternal wires post-sternotomy are visible in the left side of the image
technique, under Doppler ultrasound guidance. A 6F bipolar non-steerable catheter (Viking, Boston Scientic®) was introduced in a 6F 20cm vascu­lar sheath and was subsequently advanced via the right common femoral vein up to the right ven­tricular apex.
The CARTO ® 3 electro-anatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson) was used to guide mapping and ablation.
Ventricular pacing was carried out at twice the diastolic threshold using the EP-4™ Cardiac Stimulator (Abbott®) system. Surface ECG and intracavitary ECGs were recorded by the WorkMate Claris™ System (Abbott®).
Programmed ventricular pacing was per­formed under basal conditions and after isopren­aline infusion, up to three extrastimuli, at two coupling intervals, 600 ms and 400 ms, at the level of RV apex and RVOT, without induction of any sustained ventricular tachycardia. This was probably due to the anti-arrhythmic drugs that the patient received in the intensive care unit. Only short runs of the clinical monomorphic V were induced.
214
https://t.me/medicina_free
Question 2: Given the fact that the VT was not inducible during the EP study, what would be an appropriate ablation strategy in this case?
A. Substrate ablation—“carpet bombing”
the suspected area of origin.
B. Substrate ablation—entire “scar
isolation.”
C. VT substrate identication using pace-
mapping in sinus rhythm and ablation. D. LAVA ablation. E. No ablation should be performed in
this case.
A decision to perform mapping of the VT sub-
strate and identify the VT circuit using pacing during sinus rhythm was taken.
Given the personal history of ischemic heart
disease and remote inferior myocardial infarc­tion, and the morphology on the 12-lead ECG during VT, an origin in the LV was suspected. Mapping of the VT was therefore commenced in the left ventricle.
Access to the left ventricle was obtained using
a retrograde approach by puncturing the right common femoral artery using the modied Seldinger technique, under Doppler ultrasound guidance. A Pentaray catheter (Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson) was introduced in a 9F 20 cm vascular sheath and was subsequently advanced via the aorta to the LV.It was used to perform the anatomical and the bipolar voltage map of the LV.A Biosense Webster® SmartTouch SF open-irrigated 3.5mm tip with double curve was used to perform RF ablation.
An anatomical map of the LV was rst cre-
ated, which showed a non-dilated LV, with a vol­ume of 143 ml. A bipolar voltage map was subsequently created during sinus rhythm, which showed the presence of a large area of low­voltage electrograms at the level of the inferior wall of the LV, extending from the mitral valve to the LV apex, measuring 32 cm2, representing
20.0% of the total LV surface, compatible with scar post-myocardial infarction (Fig.14.7).
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 14.7 CARTO image in LAO 180° showing the infero-lateral wall of the left ventricle. Bipolar voltage map of the left ventricle revealing a large area of low volt­age (< 0.5mV, red color) at the level of the infero-lateral wall, compatible with myocardial scar post-myocardial infarction
Given the fact that the clinical VT was not induced during PVS, an activation map during VT was impossible to create. However, the mor­phology of the induced non-sustained VT during PVS was used during the creation of the pace­map, in order to compare the QRS morphology resulted from local LV pacing with the QRS mor­phology during VT, in order to identify the criti­cal components of the VT circuit.
The pacemap was created by pacing from the distal electrode of the roving/ablation catheter at a xed coupling interval of 600 ms in several areas of the LV, with emphasis on areas situated in or close to the myocardial scar, as initially described by de Chillou etal. [2, 3]. The PASO module of the CARTO system was used to com­pare the resulting 12-lead ECG during local pac­ing with the morphology of the PVC. A superposed correlation of 99.4% was observed in an area of the mid-inferior LV wall, at the level of the myocardial scar, at the junction of the two distal thirds with the proximal third, identifying the exit zone of the VT (Fig.14.8). This good cor­relation is explained by the fact that activation of the LV during pacing proceeds from this site in a manner similar as that during VT. The resulting QRS morphology is therefore identical to the QRS morphology during VT.