Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
5 Case 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
79
Given the failure of ablation at this site, map­ping of the coronary cusps was decided, given the anatomical relationship between the aorta and the posterior part of the RVOT.
Access to the coronary cusps was obtained using the retrograde approach. The right common femoral artery was punctured using the Seldinger technique under ultrasonographic guidance, and a 9F 20cm sheath was inserted.
Anticoagulation was obtained with unfrac­tionated heparin 100 UI/kg as IV bolus, with a target ACT between 300 and 350s.
Once anticoagulation was achieved, the roving/ ablation catheter was introduced in the common femoral artery and retrogradely advanced to the level of the aortic sinus of Valsalva. Subsequently,
an anatomical map of the coronary cusps region and of the base of the aorta was performed. Next, an activation map of the aortic cusps was created, with identication of an early activation site at the level of the junction between the right and the left coronary cusp, which preceded the onset of the QRS complex by 15ms, where the unipolar elec­trogram had a “QS” aspect (Fig.5.11).
Next, mapping of the distal part of the coro­nary sinus was decided, looking for a possible better ablation site at the level of the LV summit. An anatomical map of the coronary sinus was rst created. Then, the roving/ablation catheter was advanced inside the coronary sinus in its dis­tal part, but no optimal ablation site was found at this level (Fig.5.12).
Fig. 5.11 CARTO image in LAO 124° cranial 35° show­ing the RVOT (the transparent structure in the left side of the image) and the base of the aorta (in gray, right side of the image). The roving/ablation catheter records the elec-
trogram presented in blue, from the junction of the right and the left coronary cusps (Map 1–2). The bipolar elec­trogram precedes the onset of the QRS by 11ms, and the local unipolar electrogram has a “QS” aspect
80
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 5.12 CARTO image in LAO 133°, showing the activation map of the RVOT, the coronary cusps and the coronary sinus during the PVCs. The earliest activation site is recorded at the level of the left coronary cusp (red pin), from where the activation wavefront spreads in a radial manner, strongly suggesting a focal mechanism
Question 4: What is the next best step at this point of the procedure?
A. Ablate at the site of the earliest endocar-
dial activation at the level of the junction of the right and left coronary cusps.
B. Map the LVOT looking for a better abla-
tion site.
C. Terminate the procedure, since ablation
at this site carries a considerable risk of myocardial infarction.
D. Perform ablation at the earliest ablation
site in the RVOT with a higher power, in order to avoid the risk of myocardial infarction related to ablation in the left coronary cusp.
E. I don’t know.
Given the optimal ablation criteria found at the level of the junction of the right and left coro­nary cusps (the local bipolar electrogram preced­ing the onset of the QRS complex by 15ms and the “QS” aspect of the unipolar electrogram— Figs. 5.13 and 5.14), ablation at this site was decided.
RF energy was applied at this site with titra­tion of RF energy from 20 to 25W, with a target ablation index of 350 (Figs. 5.15 and 5.16). Disappearance of the PVC was immediately
J. Havard et al.
noticed 5s after the start of the rst RF delivery. Two additional RF lesions were created, with no recurrence of the PVC.
There were no complications related to the
procedure.
The ECG at the end of the ablation procedure
is presented in Fig.5.17.
The ECG recorded 24h later, before hospital discharge, is presented in Fig.5.18. The patient was discharged on no antiarrhythmic treatment.
A 24-h Holter ECG was recorded 1 month after the ablation procedure, which showed the presence of a low number of PVCs (Fig.5.19).
Answers
Question 1: C. Junction of the left and
right coronary cusp.
Question 2: C. No. The local unipolar
electrogram recorded by the roving/ ablation catheter at the earliest endo­cardial activation site has an “rS”
pattern. Question 3: C.Map the coronary cusps. Question 4: A.Ablate at the site of the
earliest endocardial activation at the
level of the junction between the right
and the left coronary cusps.
5 Case 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 5.13 CARTO image in LAO 64° projection of the base of the aorta showing the earliest activation site at the level of the junction of the right and left coronary cusps during PVC, with a “QS” aspect at the level of the unipolar electrogram recorded by the distal electrode of the roving/ ablation catheter
81
Fig. 5.14 A 12-lead ECG together with intracavitary leads recorded from the distal and the proximal bipolar electrode of the ablation catheter (ABL d and ABL p) and from the right ventricular apical catheter showing the ear-
liest activation site at the level of the junction of the right and left coronary cusps (Map 1–2), preceding the onset of the QRS complex by 15ms
82
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Havard et al.
Fig. 5.15 CARTO image in LAO 119° projection show­ing the anatomical relationship between the earliest endo­cardial activation site at the level of the RVOT and the earliest activation site at the level of the junction between the right and left coronary cusps. The close proximity of the posterior part of the RVOT to this site explains why the posterior and inferior wall of the RVOT is activated
Fig. 5.16 A 12-lead ECG together with intracavitary leads recorded from the distal and the proximal bipolar electrode of the ablation catheter (ABL d and ABL p) and from the right ventricular apical catheter showing rapid
rapidly after the depolarization of the left coronary cusp. The pink and red dots represent ablation lesions, both at the level of the RVOT and at the level of the left coronary cusp. The presented bipolar and unipolar electrograms are recorded from the earliest activation site in the left coro­nary cusp
disappearance of the PVC immediately after the start of RF delivery at the earliest activation site at the junction between the right and the left coronary cusp
5 Case 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 5.17 A 12-lead ECG after the RF ablation procedure showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 74bpm, QRS axis at 0°, absence of LV hypertrophy, absence of ischemia, and absence of PVC
83
Fig. 5.18 A 12-lead ECG after the RF ablation procedure showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 68bpm, QRS axis at 0°, absence of LV hypertrophy, absence of ischemia, and absence of PVC
84
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 5.19 Holter ECG recorded 1month after the RF ablation procedure showing the presence of a low number of PVCs 1024, representing 1.2% of the total number of QRS complexes during 24h
J. Havard et al.
Commentary
The present case illustrates a catheter ablation procedure of PVCs originating from the junction of the right and the left coronary cusps in a patient with no cardiovascular risk factors and no struc­tural heart disease. Several observations merit further comment.
The aortic root region can give rise to PVCs in patients with structurally normal hearts and is responsible for about 16.6–18% of cases of idio­pathic ventricular arrhythmias [1, 2]. The left and the right coronary cusps are known potential sources of PVC and VTs, while the noncoronary cusp may give rise to atrial tachycardias [35].
The exact identication of the site of origin of PVCs is done during the electrophysiological study, during the mapping phase that precedes catheter ablation. Currently, this is best guided by an electro-anatomical mapping system. However, prior to the ablation procedure, the 12-lead ECG remains a valuable tool in orienting the electro­physiologist in nding the likely origin of the PVC. Our patient presented with frequent PVC originating from the junction of the right and the left coronary cusps. A 12-lead ECG arguments in
favor of an origin at this site are a QRS transition in precordial leads in V3 and the presence of a “QS” notch in lead V1 [6]. This aspect can be observed in the ECG presented in Fig.5.1.
Another very valuable diagnostic clue on the 12-lead ECG that can orient the physician about the origin of the PVC (right side of the heart vs. left side of the heart) is the comparison between the QRS transition in the precordial leads of the PVC and the QRS transition during sinus rhythm. If the transition of the PVC takes place later than the QRS transition during sinus rhythm, the ori­gin of the PVC is in the RVOT.If the transition of the PVC takes places earlier than the QRS com­plex during sinus rhythm, the origin of the PVC is in the LVOT [6, 7]. In the above-presented patient, the ECG in Fig.5.1 shows a precordial lead transition of the PVC in lead V3 and for the QRS complex during sinus rhythm in lead V4. This localizes the origin of the PVC in the left outow tract region, fact conrmed by the activa­tion map recorded with the CARTO system and presented in Fig. 5.12. The reader is invited to view cases 1–4 and 6 for an analysis of this crite­rion on other ECGs presenting cases of outow tract ventricular arrhythmias.
5 Case 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
85
As proposed by Lin etal. [8], in patients with PVCs/VT exhibiting “qrS” pattern or “QS” pat­tern with a notch on the descending limb in lead V1 (such in the case of our patient), the presence of “m,” “r,” “R,” or “Rs” morphology in lead I predicted the origin of the PVC at the level of the left–right coronary cusp and right coronary cusp with sensitivity of 94.44%, specicity of 60%, PPV of 89.47%, and NPV of 75%. As can be seen in Fig.5.1, our patient had an “R” morphology in lead I, compatible with an origin at the level of the junction between the right and the left coro­nary cusps.
In what concerns mapping of VA originating in the outow tract region, as a general rule, this should always be started in the RVOT. This is especially true for PVCs with a QRS transition in V3, since approximately 50% of them will have an RVOT origin and 50% will have a LVOT/coro­nary cusp origin [8].
It should be acknowledged that the exact site of origin of the PVCs at the level of the coronary cusps is best identied by intracardiac echogra­phy [9]. This technique was not used in the above-presented case, but only the CARTO sys­tem. ICE allows direct visualization of the abla­tion catheter at the level of the aortic cusps and is also able to show the distance between it and the ostia of the coronary arteries.
Coronary angiography is recommended to be performed during the catheter ablation proce­dure, just before RF application, since ablation of the PVC site of origin should be performed at least 5mm away from the ostium of a coronary artery in order to avoid coronary artery injury [10]. However, as described by Hoffmayer etal. [11], ablation of PVCs originating from the aortic cusps can be safely achieved in 91% of the patients without the need of performing intra­procedural coronary angiography, if an electro­anatomical mapping system is used and ICE is available. In their experience, the use of ICE can conrm a necessary safety distance of more than 10 mm between the tip of the ablation catheter and the successful ablation site. In our patient, the use of the CARTO system was enough to safely perform successful ablation of the PVCs. However, we do recommend the use of ICE for
the ablation of PVCs/VTs originating in the aor­tic root region, when this is available.
Learning Points
• PVCs arising from the junction of the right coronary cusp and the left coro­nary cusp are characterized by an early transition in the precordial leads and by the presence of an “rS” aspect in lead V1.
• Catheter ablation, if possible using an electro-anatomical mapping sys­tem ± intracardiac echography, is the treatment of choice, given its high suc­cess rate and its low complication rate.
References
1. Kanagaratnam L, Tomassoni G, Schweikert R, Pavia S, Bash D, Beheiry S, et al. Ventricular tachycardias arising from the aortic sinus of val­salva: an under- recognized variant of left outow tract ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1408–14.
2. Yamada T, McElderry HT, Doppalapudi H, Murakami Y, Yoshida Y, Yoshida N, etal. Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias originating from the aortic root preva­lence, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics, and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(2):139–47.
3. Beukema RJ, Smit JJ, Adiyaman A, Van Casteren L, Delnoy PP, Ramdat Misier AR, etal. Ablation of focal atrial tachycardia from the non-coronary aortic cusp: case series and review of the literature. Europace. 2015;17(6):953–61.
4. Wang Z, Liu T, Shehata M, Liang Y, Jin Z, Liang M, etal. Electrophysiological characteristics of focal atrial tachycardia surrounding the aortic coronary cusps. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(6):902–8.
5. Rillig A, Meyerfeldt U, Birkemeyer R, Jung W.Ablation within the sinus of valsalva for treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias: what is known so far? Europace. 2009;11(9):1142–50.
6. Anderson RD, Kumar S, Parameswaran R, Wong G, Voskoboinik A, Sugumar H, et al. Differentiating right- and left-sided outow tract ventricular arrhythmias: classical ECG signatures and predic­tion algorithms. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(6):e007392.
7. Betensky BP, Park RE, Marchlinski FE, Hutchinson MD, Garcia FC, Dixit S, et al. The V(2) transi­tion ratio: a new electrocardiographic criterion
86
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. Havard et al.
for distinguishing left from right ventricular out­ow tract tachycardia origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(22):2255–62.
8. Lin C, Zheng C, Zhou DP, Li XW, Wu SJ, Lin JF. Origins location of the outow tract ventricu­lar arrhythmias exhibiting qrS pattern or QS pattern with a notch on the descending limb in lead V1. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):124.
9. Lin D, Ilkhanoff L, Gerstenfeld E, Dixit S, Beldner S, Bala R, et al. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic characteristics of the aortic cusp region guided by
intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(5):663–9.
10. Jagadheesan KS, Satheesh S, Pillai AA, Jayaraman B, Selvaraj RJ.Low power ablation for left coronary cusp ventricular tachycardia-efcacy and long-term outcome. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(Suppl 3):S384–S8.
11. Hoffmayer KS, Dewland TA, Hsia HH, Badhwar N, Hsu JC, Tseng ZH, et al. Safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation without coronary angiography in aortic cusp ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(7):1117–21.
Case 6
https://t.me/medicina_free
RonanLe Bouar, FrédéricHalbwachs, Jean- YvesWiedemann, JacquesLevy, DavidKenizou, andRomaricBouillard
6
Case Presentation
A 66-year-old male patient with a history of dilated cardiomyopathy with mild LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF of 46%) and ventricular arrhythmia (PVCs with a high ventricular arrhythmia burden at 24-h Holter ECG: 38,613 isolated PVC, couplets, and short runs, represent­ing 37% of the total QRS complexes/24h) was admitted to the cardiology department complain­ing of aggravated palpitations during the past few days. His cardiovascular risk factors were repre­sented by age>55years old, arterial hyperten­sion, dyslipidemia, and overweight. His medication at home consisted of ramipril 10mg, metoprolol 200mg, aspirin 75mg, and atorvas­tatin 40mg. For the treatment of his ventricular arrhythmia, ecainide and propafenone were tried but failed to reduce his symptoms, and ami­odarone was refused by the patient due to poten­tial side effects. At physical exam, his blood pressure was 116/74 mmHg, HR of 68 bpm, SpO2 99% breathing room air, H = 179 cm, W= 83 kg, and BMI= 26 kg/m2, heart sounds
R. Le Bouar (*) · J.-Y. Wiedemann · J. Levy · D. Kenizou Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr; wiedemannjy@
ghrmsa.fr; levyj@ghrmsa.fr; kenizoud@ghrmsa.fr
F. Halbwachs · R. Bouillard Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France
were irregular, there were no audible murmurs, peripheral pulses were bilaterally present, lung auscultation was normal, and he had mild bilat­eral peripheral edema, no jugular vein distention, and no hepatojugular reux. His ECG is pre­sented in Fig.6.1. The result of the 24h Holter ECG is presented in Fig.6.2.
Transthoracic echocardiography showed a mildly dilated LV with mild systolic ventricular dysfunction, EF of 46% (Fig.6.3). It also showed type 1 diastolic dysfunction, absence of signi­cant valve disease, a mildly dilated left atrium, a non-dilated right ventricle, a non-dilated right atrium, mild pulmonary hypertension, sPAP of 37 mmHg, a non-dilated IVC, and absence of pericardial effusion.
His biological workup showed a Hb level of
13.7 g/dL, leukocytes 9.57 × 109/L, platelets 170×109/L, CRP 5mg/L, BUN 7.2mmol/L, cre­atinine 96 μmol/L, glycemia 4.7 mmol/L, Na+ 140 mmol/L, K+ 4.0 mmol/L, NT pro-BNP 539pg/mL, and TSH 1.0IU/L.
Coronary angiography was performed, show­ing a signicant stenosis of the LAD coronary artery (stenosis of the second segment of the LAD, FFR of 0.66 during hyperemia vs. 0.90 at rest, red arrow), which was treated with PTCA and stent implantation (Fig.6.4).
Three months after the PTCA procedure, the LVEF did not improve and the ventricular arrhythmia burden was unchanged at his 24-h Holter ECG.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_6
87
88
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 6.1 A 12-lead ECG recoded at admittance to the cardiology department
A cardiac MRI was performed, searching for a potential ventricular arrhythmia substrate, which demonstrated the presence of large areas of delayed enhancement at the intramyocardial level of the septal and anterior wall of the left ventricle (Fig.6.5).
Question 1: What is the origin of the PVC presented in Fig. 6.1?
A. RVOT B. LVOT C. LV summit D. Right coronary cusp E. Junction of the left and right coronary
cusp
R. Le Bouar et al.