Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
215
Fig. 14.8 Left panel: CARTO image in LAO 164° cau- dal 12° showing the infero-lateral wall of the left ventri­cle. Pacemap of the left ventricle during sinus rhythm depicting the critical components of the VT circuit: the entrance zone (red color), the isthmus (the zone situated between the two white lines), and the exit zone (violet). The roving/ablation catheter is situated at the level of the
Pacing the LV in adjacent zones of the exit zone identied sites with slightly different corre­spondence percentages, until a site was found where the morphology of the paced QRS com­plex differed signicantly form the morphology of the QRS during VT. This identied the area corresponding to the entrance zone during VT.This is explained by the fact that during ven­tricular pacing, the depolarization of the LV takes place in the direction opposite to that of the VT isthmus (where slow conduction is present), toward healthy ventricular myocardium, where the conduction velocity is superior to the conduc­tion at the level of the VT isthmus. The resulting morphology is therefore very different (Fig.14.9).
exit zone of the VT circuit, represented in red. Pacing at this site (yellow star) reproduces the QRS morphology of the VT with a concordance of 99.4% (right panel). The red curved arrows indicate the two outer loops of the VT, corresponding to the activation wavefront during VT, trav­eling from red to yellow to green to blue and to violet
Once the exit zone and the entrance zone were identied, the VT isthmus was considered pres­ent between these two zones. It measured 25mm in length and 20mm in width.
Pacing the LV at the level of the VT isthmus initiated a second non-sustained monomorphic VT, with the same cycle length, but with a mor­phology different than that of the VT morphology (Fig.14.10). Using the same pacemap technique, several zones of the LV were paced at a xed coupling interval of 600 ms using the ablation catheter. The exit zone of the VT was identied in the area of the entrance zone of VT 1 (Fig.14.10). The entrance zone of the VT was identied in the area of the exit zone of VT 1 (Fig.14.11). The VT
216
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 14.9 Left panel: CARTO image in LAO 164° cau- dal 12°, same view as in Fig.14.8. Pacemap of the left ventricle in sinus rhythm identifying the entrance zone of the clinical VT (violet). Pacing with the roving/ablation catheter at this site (yellow star) reproduces a QRS mor­phology very different from the morphology of the clini­cal VT (−28%, right panel), even though the catheter is situated at a very short distance compared to its position in
isthmus was therefore the same as for VT 1. The two VTs shared the same macro-reentry circuit, but in an opposite direction, explaining the same VT cycle length.
Having identied the critical components of the VT (the entrance zone, the VT isthmus, and the exit zone), RF ablation was performed by cre­ating an ablation line which transected the VT isthmus. The target parameters were power 35W and ablation index 550. After ablation of the VT isthmus, additional RF lesions were deployed in order to create a line from the VT isthmus to the mitral valve, in order to prevent potential future
Fig.14.8 (see text for further explanation). This is due to the fact that the activation wavefront from this site propa­gates not through the VT isthmus where slow-conducting myocardial bers are found but in the opposite direction, through myocardial bers that conduct the activation wavefront faster, therefore creating a QRS morphology different from the QRS morphology during VT
peri-mitral reentry VT. Ablation of the LAVA identied at the level of the scar was also per­formed. The bipolar voltage map of the LV with the superimposed RF ablation lesions is pre­sented in Fig.14.12.
Programmed ventricular stimulation was per­formed after the ablation, without the induction of any sustained or non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias. However, since no sustained VT was induced before the ablation procedure, this fact was not able to conrm the acute ablation success.
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
217
Fig. 14.10 Left panel: CARTO image in LAO 164° cau- dal 12°, same view as in Figs.14.8 and 14.9. Pacemap of the left ventricle during sinus rhythm identifying the exit zone of the second VT (red color). The QRS morphology during VT is shown in the right panel. The roving/ablation catheter is situated at the level of the exit zone of the VT circuit, represented in red. Pacing at this site reproduces a QRS morphology with a concordance of 94% with the morphology of VT 2 (right panel). The red curved arrows indicate the two outer loops of the VT, corresponding to
There were no complications related to the
ablation procedure.
The 12-lead ECG recorded at the end of the
ablation procedure is presented in Fig.14.13.
The ICD interrogation performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-ablation procedure showed no tachycardia recurrence.
the activation wavefront during VT, traveling from red to yellow to green to blue and to violet. It is worth noting that the clinical VT (VT 1, with its mechanism presented in Figs.14.5 and 14.6) and VT 2 share the same components (isthmus, exit zone, and entrance zone) but with opposite rotation direction of the wavefront: The exit zone of the VT 1 corresponds to the entrance zone of the VT 2, and the entrance zone of VT 1 corresponds to the exit zone of the VT 2
Answers
Question 1: E.Ventricular tachycardia
Question 2: C.VT substrate identi­cation using pacemapping in sinus rhythm and ablation
218
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 14.11 Left panel: CARTO image in LAO 164° cau- dal 12°, same view as in Figs. 14.8, 14.9, and 14.10. Pacemap of the left ventricle during sinus rhythm identi­fying the entrance zone of the second VT (violet). The roving/ablation catheter is situated at the level of the entrance zone of the VT circuit, represented in violet.
Fig. 14.12 CARTO image showing left ventricular bipo­lar voltage map after RF ablation. Red and pink dots cor­respond to the ablation lesions deployed at the level of the VT isthmus transecting it (1), from the VT isthmus to the mitral annulus in order to block the corridor around the mitral valve that could sustain peri-mitral reentry (2) and at the level of the LAVA (3), homogenizing the scar
Pacing with the roving/ablation catheter at this site pro­duces a QRS morphology very different from the mor­phology of the clinical VT (negative concordance of
34%, right panel), even though the catheter is situated at a very short distance compared to its position in Fig.14.10 (see text for further explanation)
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 14.13 A 12-lead ECG recorded after the ablation procedure showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 68bpm; QRS axis at 30°; Q waves in leads II, III, and aVF; and negative T waves in V5, V6, lead I, and aVL
219
Commentary
The present case illustrates a catheter ablation procedure of monomorphic ventricular tachycar­dia in a 69-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and remote inferior myocardial infarction. Several observations merit further discussion.
Ischemic heart disease with previous myocar­dial infarction is the number one cause of ven­tricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease [4]. The myocardial scar post­myocardial infarction can be responsible for the appearance of ventricular tachycardia even years after the acute event. In the experience of de Chillou et al., the average time interval after myocardial infarction and VT diagnosis can be almost 20 years (19.2 ± 5.6 years) [2]. This is also the case of the above-presented patient, in which the VT developed 20years after his myo­cardial infarction.
Treatment options for ventricular tachycardia in the context of old myocardial infarction include anti-arrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and ICD implantation.
Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for VT in ischemic heart disease, usually as complement to ICD implantation. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis including 635 patients who were followed for a duration ranging from 6 to 27.9months showed that cath­eter ablation signicantly decreased the odds of appropriate ICD therapies (OR 0.49; 95% CI
0.28–0.87), appropriate ICD shocks (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28–0.96), VT storm (OR 0.64; 95% CI
0.43–0.95), and cardiac hospitalization (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46–0.97) [5]. Catheter ablation was also the option of choice in our patient, since an ICD had already been implanted and catheter ablation is known to be superior to amiodarone in terms of efcacy for the treatment of VT in isch­emic heart disease [6]. The presence of amiodarone- induced hyperthyroidism in our patient represented a contraindication to its administrations.
Regarding the technique used for guiding the ablation procedure, a three-dimensional electro­anatomical mapping system (such as the CARTO system, Biosense Webster®) is currently widely used in clinical practice, given its association
220
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
with procedure time and uoroscopy time reduc­tion [79].
Possible strategies described for VT ablation in patients with remote myocardial infarction include substrate mapping and ablation during sinus rhythm [1012], activation mapping [13
15], pacemapping during sinus rhythm for identi-
cation of the VT components [6], and entrainment mapping [1618]. These strategies are often combined, in order to maximize the result of the ablation procedure. Among these, activation mapping is the best option when the VT is inducible during the procedure and when it is hemodynamically well tolerated. However, when this is not the case, the other ablation strate­gies are used, in variable combinations, depend­ing on the operator’s experience.
One of the most useful techniques for VT ablation when the arrhythmia is non-sustained, non-inducible, or not tolerated by the patient is identication of the critical VT components using the pacing technique during sinus rhythm described by de Chillou etal. [2]. This was suc­cessfully used in the above-presented patient, in whom the arrhythmia was non-sustained at the beginning of the ablation procedure (likely due to anti-arrhythmic administration in the cardiology department before the procedure). In brief, the technique of pacemapping during sinus rhythm requires comparison between the QRS morphol­ogy resulted from local pacing at a specic site and the morphology of the VT recorded by the 12-lead surface ECG. Using the PASO correla­tion algorithm of the CARTO system, the corre­lation between these two morphologies can be estimated, and this can take values from −100% (in case of complete discordance between the 2) to 100% (perfect match). Several points from areas located in the possible VT origin are paced at twice the diastolic threshold at the VT cycle length, and the percentage of correlation is repre­sented on a CARTO map, with red color corre­sponding to the best match and violet to the poorest match. Orange, yellow, green, and blue colors represent intermediate matches. In the VT exist zone and close to it, there will be good cor-
relations between the locally generated QRS morphology and the 12-lead VT morphology. This is due to the fact that the depolarization wavefront travels in the same direction during local pacing as during VT. In the VT entrance zone, there will be a poor correlation between the locally generated QRS morphology and the 12-lead VT morphology. This is due to the fact that the depolarization wavefront travels in oppo­site direction during local pacing and during VT, since during local pacing, the wavefront propa­gates faster from the entrance zone to the sur­rounding healthy myocardial tissue than during myocardial scar, where conduction velocity is signicantly decreased. According to de Chillou etal., regarding VT isthmuses, the best correla­tion percentages are found in the VT exit zones and isthmus exit part (89%±8% and 84%±7%, respectively), and the poorest correlations are found close to the scar border in the outer entrance zones (23% ± 28%), in the entrance zones (39%±34%), and in the entrance part of the isthmus (32%±26%).
The VT isthmus orientation in the case of an inferior basal myocardial infarction is usually parallel to the mitral valve [19]. The VT circuit is usually a dual loop in a “gure of 8” shape, with one loop turning around the mitral annulus and the other around a line of anatomical or func­tional line of block. Other possibilities are single­loop circuits, which are rarer. The average dimensions of the VT isthmus are 31± 7 mm (ranging from 18 to 41mm) long and 16±8mm (ranging from 6 to 36mm) wide. Efcient abla­tion requires creating a line of RF lesions perpen­dicular to the VT isthmus. The end point of the ablation procedure is non-inducibility of any sus­tained VT.For this reason, programmed ventricu­lar stimulation should always be performed after the ablation, in order to test the result of ablation. Sometimes, other sustained VTs can be induced during programmed ventricular stimulation, which may or may not be favored by the RF lesions deployed prior, for the ablation of the clinical VT (for such an example, see Case 12). In our presented patient, programmed ventricular
14 Case 14
https://t.me/medicina_free
221
stimulation was performed after the ablation, without the induction of any sustained or non­sustained ventricular arrhythmias. However, since no sustained VT was induced before the ablation procedure, this fact was not able to con­rm the acute ablation success. Nevertheless, the patient presented no VT recurrence at his ICD follow-up visits during the follow-up period of 2years.
Learning Points
• Catheter ablation is an efcient treat­ment option for ventricular tachycardia in the context of ischemic heart disease and prior myocardial infarction.
• When the VT is non-sustained, non­inducible during the procedure, or hemodynamically not tolerated, pace­mapping during sinus rhythm can iden­tify the VT critical components: the VT isthmus, the entrance zone, and exit zone and can allow a successful ablation procedure.
• A three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system is a very useful tool in guiding the VT ablation procedure.
References
1. Bayes de Luna A, Rovai D, Pons Llado G, Gorgels A, Carreras F, Goldwasser D, et al. The end of an electrocardiographic dogma: a prominent R wave in V1 is caused by a lateral not posterior myocardial infarction-new evidence based on contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance-electrocardiogram corre­lations. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(16):959–64.
2. de Chillou C, Groben L, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, MagdiAbbas M, Zhang N, et al. Localizing the critical isthmus of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia: the value of pace-mapping during sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):175–81.
3. de Chillou C, Sellal JM, Magnin-Poull I.Pace mapping to localize the critical isthmus of ventricular tachycar­dia. Cardiac Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9(1):71–80.
4. Lopez EM, Malhotra R. Ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019;10(8):3762–73.
5. Martinez BK, Baker WL, Konopka A, Giannelli D, Coleman CI, Kluger J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(1):e206–e19.
6. Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, etal. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(2):111–21.
7. Knecht S, Sticherling C, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, Muhl A, Schaer B, etal. Effective reduction of uoroscopy duration by using an advanced electroanatomic­mapping system and a standardized procedural pro­tocol for ablation of atrial brillation: 'the unleaded study'. Europace. 2015;17(11):1694–9.
8. Plank F, Stowasser B, Till D, Schgor W, Dichtl W, Hintringer F, etal. Reduction of uoroscopy dose for cardiac electrophysiology procedures: a feasibility and safety study. Eur J Radiol. 2019;110:105–11.
9. Yamagata K, Aldhoon B, Kautzner J. Reduction of uoroscopy time and radiation dosage during catheter ablation for atrial brillation. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(2):144–9.
10. Kella DK, Sheldon SH, Noheria A, Padmanabhan D, Munger T, Asirvatham SJ, etal. Dening the sub­strate for ventricular tachycardia ablation: the impact of rhythm at the time of mapping. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020;20(4):147–53.
11. Kitamura T, Martin CA, Vlachos K, Martin R, Frontera A, Takigawa M, etal. Substrate mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: how to identify ventricular tachycardia substrate. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019;10(3):3565–80.
12. Kumar S, Baldinger SH, Romero J, Fujii A, Mahida SN, Tedrow UB, etal. Substrate-based ablation versus ablation guided by activation and entrainment map­ping for ventricular tachycardia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(12):1437–47.
13. Harris L, Downar E, Mickleborough L, Shaikh N, Parson I. Activation sequence of ventricular tachy­cardia: endocardial and epicardial mapping stud­ies in the human ventricle. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10(5):1040–7.
14. Hooks DA, Yamashita S, Capellino S, Cochet H, Jais P, Sacher F. Ultra-rapid Epicardial activa­tion mapping during ventricular tachycardia using continuous sampling from a high-density basket (Orion(TM) ) catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(10):1153–4.
15. Waspe LE, Brodman R, Kim SG, Matos JA, Johnston DR, Scavin GM, etal. Activation mapping in patients with coronary artery disease with multiple ventricular tachycardia congurations: occurrence and therapeu­tic implications of widely separate apparent sites of origin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5(5):1075–86.
222
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
16. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Ganz LI. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocar­dial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8(11):1309–19.
17. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Kocovic D, Harada T, et al. Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1180–9.
18. Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, Saxon LA, Middlekauff HR, Natterson PD, et al. Identication of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993;88(4 Pt
1):1647–70.
19. de Chillou C, Lacroix D, Klug D, Magnin-Poull I, Marquie C, Messier M, etal. Isthmus characteristics of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(6):726–31.
Case 15
https://t.me/medicina_free
RonanLe Bouar, FrédéricHalbwachs, ThomasRobein, JacquesLevy, LaurentJacquemin, CharlineDaval, andCrinaMuresan
15
Case Presentation
A 70-year-old male patient with a past medical history of remote anterior myocardial infarction at the age of 50years treated with CABG (right internal mammary artery, LAD coronary artery ,and left internal mammary artery, CX coronary artery); ischemic cardiomyopathy with severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF of 25%); single­chamber ICD implantation for the primary pre­vention of sudden cardiac death at age 53years, upgraded to CRT-D at the age of 65years; and permanent atrial brillation was admitted to the emergency department for electrical storm. ICD interrogation of his Biotronik ILIVIA 7 HF-T
R. Le Bouar (*) · J. Levy · L. Jacquemin · C. Daval C. Muresan Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr; levyj@ghrmsa.fr;
jacqueminl@ghrmsa.fr; charline.daval@ghrmsa.fr; crina.muresan@ghrmsa.fr
F. Halbwachs · T. Robein Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France
ICD (Fig.15.1) revealed several episodes of sus­tained monomorphic VT which required ICD intervention: burst ventricular pacing which were sometimes unsuccessful (Fig. 15.2) and several episodes requiring internal electrical cardioversion.
His cardiovascular risk factors were repre­sented by age > 55years old, a past history of smoking (30 pack-years), and grade 1 obesity.
His medication at home consisted of sacubi­tril/valsartan 49/51 mg/day, carvedilol 3×12.5 mg, atorvastatin 40mg, and uindione 30mg/day.
In the emergency department, at physical examination, his blood pressure was 83/52mmHg, HR 155bpm, and SpO2 98% with 3 L O2/min via nasal cannula, his heart sounds were rapid and regular, he was in mild respiratory distress with 20 breaths/min, lung auscultation revealed mild bilateral crepitant rales, and he had mild bilateral edema.
His ECG at presentation is showed in Fig.15.3.
Overdrive ventricular pacing (ramp) was per­formed which stopped the tachycardia and con­verted the ventricular rhythm to biventricular pacing (Fig.15.4).
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_15
223
224
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 15.1 ICD interrogation showing repeated episodes of a tachycardia with a cycle length of 375–383 ms, detected in the VT1 window, successfully (episode 67)
Fig. 15.2 ICD electrograms showing unsuccessful ATP (the rst ten electrograms marked VDp and VGp) during an episode of VT.At the end of ventricular pacing, the tachycardia continues with a cycle length around 390ms
and unsuccessfully (episode 71–83) treated with antit­achycardia pacing (ATP)