Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
296
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 18.23 CARTO image in RAO 70° caudal 30° showing the bipolar voltage map (left panel) and the unipolar volt- age map (right panel), with superposed RF ablation lesions (pink and red dots)
Fig. 18.24 A 12-lead ECG showing the absence of VT induction during PVS after the ablation of the clinical VT
18 Case 18
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 18.25 A 12-lead ECG recorded at the end of the ablation procedure showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 50bpm, QRS axis at +60°, absence of LV hypertrophy, and inferior wall necrosis
Fig. 18.26 Chest radiography in a posteroanterior position showing the presence of a subcutaneous ICD (ICD lead, single arrow; ICD can, double arrow)
297
Commentary
The present case illustrates a catheter ablation procedure for two monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in a 43-year-old male patient with
ischemic cardiomyopathy and remote inferior myocardial infarction. Several observations can be made about the present case.
Among all structural heart disease, ischemic
heart disease with prior myocardial infarction
298
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
represents the number one case of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia [2, 3]. Patients with VT after myocardial infarction often have multiple morphologies of inducible VT during the electrophysiological study, with an average of 3.6±2, in the experience of Stevenson etal. [4]. Induction of several VT morphologies during the electrophysiological study that pre­cedes the catheter ablation phase may prolong the duration of the ablation procedure, since the goal of a catheter ablation procedure of ventricu­lar tachycardia is ablation of all sustained mono­morphic VTs and non-inducibility of any sustained VT at the end of the ablation procedure [5]. In the above-presented patient, a non­previously documented sustained VT was induced during PVS. However, given its sus­tained nature, this was considered signicant and a decision to performed catheter ablation was taken. The activation mapping performed during VT demonstrated its origin in the area of previ­ous myocardial infarction, at the level of the low interventricular septum, conrming the presence of substrate for this VT also.
The site of origin of VT can be approximated
from the 12-lead ECG.Several papers have been currently published proposing several algorithms for identication of the VT site of origin [68]. By applying some of the criteria from these algo­rithms to the present case, the negative QRS mor­phology during the clinical VT in the inferior leads, the “double transition” recorded in precor­dial leads (rS in lead V1, R in lead V2, and RS in lead V3), and the unique “R” wave in leads I and aVL, the suggested origin of the VT from Fig.18.1 is at the level of the infero-septal wall of the LV. This fact was conrmed by the electro­physiological study. The same criteria apply to the second VT, which has a 12-lead ECG close to that of the rst VT.
The strategies used in the above-presented
case for identifying the VT isthmus for the two monomorphic VTs were 1. substrate mapping (for both VTs), 2. activation mapping for the rst VT (see Figs. 18.12, 18.3, 18.4, and 18.15 and video 18.1), and 3. pacemapping during sinus rhythm for the second VT (Figs. 18.19 and
18.20).
Substrate mapping during sinus rhythm has as goal identication of areas of scar slow conduc­tion which might serve as origin for the ventricu­lar tachycardia. In cases of previous myocardial infarction, the identication of myocardial scar is the rst step inlocalizing the potential VT circuit, since most of VTs in this context originate in areas of slow conduction/low-amplitude local electrograms, corresponding to areas of myocar­dial brosis or in borderline areas (the junction between brotic areas and healthy myocardium) [9, 10]. In the above-presented case, Fig.18.15 illustrates the anatomical relationship between the location of the VT isthmus and the location of the myocardial scar. The VT isthmus is situated in such an area of myocardial scar, displayed between the two white lines on the bipolar volt­age map. Given the possible large areas of scar post-myocardial infarction, with the presence of late potential in several wide areas of the ventri­cles, substrate mapping alone is not likely to suf­ce in identifying the VT isthmus, and other additional mapping techniques are usually required.
Activation mapping is the preferred ablation technique, since it allows understanding of the VT mechanism (macro-reentry vs. focal) and accurately identies the VT isthmus with the entrance and exit zones [11, 12]. However, this requires a good hemodynamic tolerance of the VT by the patient [13]. The activation map can be created relatively fast, in a matter of minutes, especially if multielectrode diagnostic catheters are used [14]. The development of such diagnos­tic catheters created the concept of high-density mapping, where thousands of local electrograms are recorded and put together in order to create an activation map [15]. The exit point of the VT is dened by the earliest activation site on the map recorded during VT, from where the activation spreads toward other areas of ventricular myocar­dium. A presystolic local potential is usually observed at the exit site of the slow conduction zone during VT.The entrance point of the VT is dened by the latest activation site during ven­tricular systole (corresponding to the duration of the QRS complex), where the VT isthmus begins. The VT isthmus is dened by the area delineated
18 Case 18
https://t.me/medicina_free
by two functional or anatomical barriers, situated between the entrance and the exit points. During VT, the mapping or the ablation catheter can record local diastolic potentials, propagating from the entrance point to the exit point.
In cases where the VT is hemodynamically not tolerated, non-sustained, or non-inducible during the electrophysiological study, pacemap­ping during sinus rhythm can accurately identify the VT isthmus, with the exit and entrance zone [1, 16, 17]. A number of electrogram characteris­tics (the bipolar voltage, the number of positive peaks, and the spike to QRS interval) can suc­cessfully identify a VT isthmus entrance in post­infarct patients [18]. This technique is presented widely in the commentary section of cases 14, 16, and 17.
Whatever the mapping technique used to iden­tify the VT isthmus, once this is accomplished, the most efcient ablation technique is ablation of the VT isthmus [1, 13, 19]. In the above­presented patient, the VT isthmi of both ventricu­lar tachycardias were situated at the level of the interventricular septum, in an area of scar post­myocardial infarction. The isthmus of the clinical VT was close to the mitral valve, and transecting it required creation of an ablation line joining the area of previously deployed RF lesions and the mitral valve annulus. This prevented any peri­mitral macro-reentry.
The patient remains VT-free 4 months after the ablation procedure.
Learning Points
• Catheter ablation is an efcient treat­ment option for monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia post-myocardial infarction.
• Programmed ventricular stimulation performed during the electrophysiologi­cal study often induces multiple VT morphologies, with an average of
3.6±2.
• The goal of a catheter ablation proce­dure of ventricular tachycardia is abla­tion of all sustained monomorphic VTs
299
and non-inducibility of any sustained VT at the end of the ablation procedure.
• When ablating ventricular tachycardias with origin in the interventricular sep­tum area of the left ventricle, care must be exercised not to damage the left bun­dle branch and its ramications.
References
1. de Chillou C, Groben L, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, MagdiAbbas M, Zhang N, et al. Localizing the critical isthmus of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia: the value of pace-mapping during sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):175–81.
2. Miller JM, Altemose GT, Jayachandran JV.Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Cardiol Rev. 2001;9(6):302–11.
3. Zeppenfeld K, Stevenson WG.Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31(3):358–74.
4. stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Ganz LI. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricu­lar tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8(11):1309–19.
5. Fukunaga M, Goya M, Hiroshima K, Hayashi K, Ohe M, Makihara Y, et al. Impact of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with prior myocar­dial infarctions. J arrhythm. 2016;32(6):462–7.
6. Josephson ME, Callans DJ. Using the twelve-lead electrocardiogram to localize the site of origin of ven­tricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(4):443–6.
7. Haqqani HM, Morton JB, Kalman JM. Using the 12-lead ECG to localize the origin of atrial and ven­tricular tachycardias: part 2—ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(7):825–32.
8. Ushijima S, Kamata E, Saito H, Mitsui T, Kobayashi H, Iwa T.Diagnosis of the origin of ventricular tachy­cardia by 12-lead electrocardiogram—evaluation of ECG of clinical cases of VT. Kokyu to Junkan. 1984;32(6):619–25.
9. Arruda M, Fahmy T, Armaganijan L, Di Biase L, Patel D, Natale A.Endocardial and epicardial mapping and catheter ablation of post myocardial infarction ventric­ular tachycardia: a substrate modication approach. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;28(2):137–45.
10. Verma A, Marrouche NF, Schweikert RA, Saliba W, Wazni O, Cummings J, et al. Relationship between successful ablation sites and the scar border zone dened by substrate mapping for ventricular tachy­cardia post-myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(5):465–71.
300
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
11. Fiala M, Chovanzik J, Neuwirth R, Nykl I, Szymeczek H, Nevralova R, etal. Sustained monomorphic ven­tricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Different arrhythmogenic substrates, dif­ferent options of palliative and curative treatment in the era of three-dimensional mapping. Vnitr Lek. 2006;52(6):577–89.
12. Kitamura T, Martin CA, Vlachos K, Martin R, Frontera A, Takigawa M, et al. Substrate mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease: how to identify ventricu­lar tachycardia substrate. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag. 2019;10(3):3565–80.
13. Dixit S, Callans DJ.Mapping for ventricular tachy­cardia. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2002;6(4):436–41.
14. Schalij MJ, van Rugge FP, Siezenga M, van der Velde ET. Endocardial activation mapping of ventricular tachycardia in patients: rst application of a 32-site bipolar mapping electrode catheter. Circulation. 1998;98(20):2168–79.
15. Martin R, Hocini M, Haisaguerre M, Jais P, Sacher F. Ventricular tachycardia isthmus characteristics: insights from high-density mapping. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol Rev. 2019;8(1):54–9.
16. de Chillou C, Sellal JM, Magnin-Poull I.Pace mapping to localize the critical isthmus of ventricular tachycar­dia. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9(1):71–80.
17. Brunckhorst CB, Delacretaz E, Soejima K, Maisel WH, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG.Identication of the ventricular tachycardia isthmus after infarction by pace mapping. Circulation. 2004;110(6):652–9.
18. Battaglia A, Odille F, Magnin-Poull I, Sellal JM, Hoyland P, Hooks D, et al. An efcient algorithm based on electrograms characteristics to identify ven­tricular tachycardia isthmus entrance in post-infarct patients. Europace. 2020;22(1):109–16.
19. de Chillou C, Lacroix D, Klug D, Magnin-Poull I, Marquie C, Messier M, etal. Isthmus characteristics of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(6):726–31.
Case 19
https://t.me/medicina_free
RonanLe Bouar, FrédéricHalbwachs, ThomasRobein, OlivierRoth, CrinaMuresan, TarekEl Nazer, andYasmineDoghmi
19
Case Presentation
A 55-year-old male patient with a past medical history of remote inferior myocardial infarction at the age of 40years, with no lesion at the level of the epicardial coronary arteries evidenced by coronary angiography (MINOCA), complicated by Dressler pericarditis that required surgical drainage, with dilated cardiomyopathy and mod­erate LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF of 43%) was admitted to the emergency department for recurrent episodes of palpitations with sudden onset accompanied by dyspnea and dizziness that had started 3days prior to his presentation to the emergency department. He described the pres­ence of several such episodes during the past 18months.
His cardiovascular risk factors were repre­sented by a past history of tobacco smoking, dys­lipidemia, and grade 3 obesity. His medication at home consisted of nebivolol 5mg, atorvastatin 40mg, and aspirin 75mg.
R. Le Bouar (*) · O. Roth · C. Muresan · T. El Nazer Y. Doghmi Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr; rotho@ghrmsa.fr;
crina.muresan@ghrmsa.fr; tarek.elnazer@ghrmsa.fr; yasmine.hadjidj@ghrmsa.fr
F. Halbwachs · T. Robein Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France
At physical examination, his blood pressure was 123/74 mmHg, HR 190 bpm, SpO2 92% breathing room air, H=1.79m, W=135kg, and BMI=42.13kg/m2, heart sounds were rapid and regular, there were no audible murmurs, lung auscultation revealed bilateral crepitant rales, and there were no signs of right heart failure.
His ECG at presentation is showed in Fig.19.1.
His biological workup showed a Hb level of
13.6 g/dL, leukocytes 7.41 × 109/L, platelets 167×109/L, CRP 7mg/L, BUN 8.9mmol/L, cre­atinine 161μmol/L, glycemia 7.1mmol/L (non­fasting), Na+135mmol/L, K+ 3.8mmol/L, cTnI
0.12 ng/mL, TSH 2.47 IU/L, total cholesterol 192 mg/dL, HDL 42 mg/dL, LDL 120 mg/dL, and triglycerides 148mg/dL.
Question 1: What is the nature of the
tachycardia presented in Fig. 19.1?
A. SVT with functional RBBB
B. Antidromic tachycardia
C. Ventricular tachycardia
D. Atrial utter with 1:1 AV conduction
E. Atrial brillation with RBBB
His ECG recorded after the administration of amiodarone 300 mg IV is presented in Fig.19.2.
Figure 19.1 explained: This shows a wide QRS complex tachycardia with a heart rate of
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_19
301
302
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 19.1 A 12-lead ECG at admission to the emergency department showing a wide QRS complex tachycardia with RBBB and superior axis, with a heart rate of 191bpm
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 19.2 A 12-lead ECG at admittance to the cardiology department showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 75bpm, QRS axis at +60°, absence of LV hypertrophy,
191bpm, with a RBBB aspect, and superior axis. The differential diagnosis includes SVT with functional bundle branch block, antidromic tachycardia (ventricular preexcitation syndrome), and ventricular tachycardia. Given the absence of
attened T waves in V5, negative in V6, attened in lead II, negative in lead III and aVF, two isolated PVC, and incomplete RBBB
ventricular preexcitation on the ECG in sinus rhythm (Fig.19.2), antidromic tachycardia is not highly likely (even though not impossible). Arguments in favor of ventricular tachycardia are the presence of myocardial infarction in the
19 Cas e 19
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 19.3 Chest X-ray in posteroanterior view showing an enlarged cardiac silhouette with an increased cardio­thoracic index, no pleural effusion, and no sign of infec­tion in the pulmonary parenchyma
patient’s medical history and the morphological criteria on the patient’s ECG: R wave taller than R’ wave in lead V1 and a ration of R/S in lead V5<1.
The patient’s chest X-ray is presented in
Fig.19.3.
Transthoracic echocardiography was per­formed, which demonstrated a mildly dilated LV, with akinesia of the inferior basal and middle segment of the LV wall and with moderate to severe systolic dysfunction, type 1 diastolic dys­function, absence of any major valvular disease, a mildly dilated left atrium, non-dilated right atrium and right ventricle, a non-dilated IVC, sPAP of 30 mmHg, and absence of pericardial effusion (Fig.19.4).
303
Question 2: What is the origin of the ven­tricular tachycardia presented in Fig.
19.1?
A. LV inferior wall B. LV superior wall C. LV lateral wall D. LV septum E. LV apex
In order to rule out ongoing myocardial isch­emia, given the diagnosis of ventricular tachycar­dia and the slightly elevated troponin level, coronary angiography was performed, which demonstrated no signicant obstructive lesion at the level of the epicardial coronary arteries (Fig.19.5).
A cardiac MRI was subsequently performed, which conrmed the presence of subendocardial myocardial necrosis at the level of the inferior basal and middle LV wall and moderate LV sys­tolic dysfunction (Fig.19.6).
Given the diagnosis of ventricular tachycar­dia, the presence of remote inferior myocardial infarction, the young age of the patient and the high rate of potential adverse effects associated with long-term amiodarone administration, and the superiority of catheter ablation to antiarrhyth­mic drugs in the treatment of VT, an electrophysi­ological study in view of a catheter ablation procedure was scheduled and subsequently performed.
304
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. Le Bouar et al.
Fig. 19.4 Left upper panel: Transthoracic echocardiog- raphy showing M mode in parasternal long-axis view, with a mildly dilated LV (EDD of 65mm), global hypoki­nesia (ESD of 53mm), with severe LV systolic dysfunc­tion and a LVEF of 35% (Teicholtz). Right upper panel: Trans-mitral Doppler ow interrogation showing type 1 diastolic dysfunction (E wave < A wave). Left lower
panel: Tissue Doppler analysis with the cursor placed at the septal part of the mitral annulus, showing a e’ wave of
8.3 cm/s with a ratio of E/e’ of 3.5, in favor of non­augmented LV lling pressure. Right lower panel: Apical ve-chamber view showing a preserved cardiac output of
4.37L/min
19 Cas e 19
https://t.me/medicina_free
305
Fig. 19.5 Coronary angiography image showing absence of signicant stenosis at the level of the left main coronary artery, as well as at the level of the LAD and circumex
coronary arteries (left panel) and at the level of the right coronary artery (right panel)