Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
16 Case 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 16.9 CARTO image in LAO 180° caudal 3° view showing the inferior wall of the left ventricle. Bipolar voltage map of the left ventricle revealing a large area of low voltage (< 0.5mV, red color) at the level of the inferior and basal LV wall, compatible with myocardial scar. The scar area represents 15% of the total LV surface and measures 36.1cm
2
255
The presence of LAVA was noticed at this level on the Pentaray catheter during RV apical pacing (Fig.16.14).
Having identied the critical components of the VT (the entrance zone, the VT isthmus, and the exit zone), RF ablation was performed by cre­ating an ablation line which transected the VT isthmus. The target parameters were power 35W and ablation index 550. After ablation of the VT isthmus, additional RF lesions were deployed in order to eliminate the LAVA.The bipolar voltage map of the LV with the superimposed RF abla­tion lesions is presented in Fig.16.15.
Programmed ventricular stimulation was per­formed after the ablation, with up to three extra­stimuli, before and after isoprenaline administration, without the induction of any sus­tained or non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias.
There were no complications related to the
ablation procedure.
The 12-lead ECG recorded at the end of the
ablation procedure is presented in Fig.16.16.
The ICD interrogation performed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-ablation procedure showed no ventricular tachycardia recurrence.
Answers
Question 1: D.Ventricular tachycardia
Question 2: A.LV inferior and basal
wall
Question 3: C.VT substrate identi­cation using pacemapping in sinus rhythm and ablation
256
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 16.10 CARTO image in LAO 180° showing the Pentaray catheter positioned at the level of the inferior LV wall scar, recording LAVA, as shown by the poles 13–14
F. Halbwachs et al.
16 Case 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
257
Fig. 16.11 CARTO image showing the identication of the exit point of the VT during sinus rhythm. Left panel: PASO module image with superposition of the locally generated QRS morphology and the morphology of the clinical VT.A concordance of 97% at this point identied the exit point of the VT circuit. Of note, the red area cor­responds to the exit zone of the VT, which is rather wide. Middle panel: LAO 180° view of the LV showing the
roving/ablation catheter positioned at a site on the inferior and basal LV wall, where the locally generated QRS was almost identical to the QRS morphology during clinical VT, therefore identifying the exit point. Right panel: bipolar map of the LV in LAO 180° showing the corre­sponding position of the exit point of the VT circuit on inside the myocardial scar
258
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Halbwachs et al.
Fig. 16.12 CARTO image showing the identication of the entrance point of the VT during sinus rhythm. Left panel: PASO module image with superposition of the locally generated QRS morphology and the morphology of the clinical VT. A concordance of 17% at this point identied the entrance point of the VT circuit. This is explained by the fact that during ventricular pacing, the depolarization of the LV takes place in the direction oppo­site to that of the VT isthmus (where slow conduction is present), toward healthy ventricular myocardium, where the conduction velocity is superior to the conduction at the
level of the VT isthmus. The resulting morphology is therefore very different. Middle panel: LAO 180° view of the LV showing the roving/ablation catheter positioned at a site on the inferior and basal LV wall, close to the exit zone of the VT, where the locally generated QRS was very different from the QRS morphology during clinical VT, therefore identifying the entrance point. Right panel: bipolar map of the LV in LAO 180° view showing the cor­responding position of the entrance point of the VT circuit
16 Case 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
259
Fig. 16.13 Left panel: PASO module image with super- position of the locally generated QRS morphology and the morphology of the clinical VT.A concordance of 17% at this point identied the entrance point of the VT circuit. Middle panel: pacemap with superposed VT circuit (for learning purposes): the VT isthmus is delineated by the
two white lines; the two outer loops are presented in red; the entrance zone is represented by the red color; the entrance zone is represented by the violet color. Right panel: bipolar map of the LV in LAO 180° showing the corresponding position of the exit point of the VT isthmus on inside the myocardial scar
Fig. 16.14 CARTO image in LAO 180° view (same as in Fig.16.8) showing the Pentaray catheter positioned at the level of the inferior LV wall scar, recording LAVA (left part of the image)
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Halbwachs et al.
Fig. 16.15 CARTO image showing left ventricular bipo­lar voltage map after RF ablation. Red and pink dots cor­respond to the ablation lesions deployed at the level of the
Fig. 16.16 A 12-lead ECG recorded after the ablation procedure showing atrial brillation with paced biventricular rhythm with a heart rate of 70bpm
VT isthmus transecting it and at the level of the LAVA, homogenizing the scar
16 Case 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
261
Commentary
The above-presented case illustrates a catheter ablation procedure of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in a 71-year-old male patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and remote inferior myocardial infarction. Several observations can be made about the present case.
As discussed in the commentary section of cases 12–15, coronary artery disease with prior myocardial infarction is the most common cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with struc­tural heart disease [3]. According to the current ESC guidelines on the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death, catheter ablation of ven­tricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic heart disease has a class I indication level of evi­dence B in patients with ICD and recurrent shocks due to sustained VT [4]. Other treatment options include anti-arrhythmic drugs and ICD implantation [4]. In the above-presented patient, given the presence of a severe systolic dysfunc­tion and his past medical history of amiodarone­induced hyperthyroidism, no class I or class III anti-arrhythmic drugs could be administered. He was already an ICD carrier; therefore, the best remaining treatment option was catheter ablation.
Presently, three-dimensional electro­anatomical mapping systems have become uni­versally present in the electrophysiology labs and are widely used to guide catheter ablation proce­dures [5, 6]. This is especially true for ablation procedures of ventricular tachycardia, where sub­strate mapping is very important in identifying the tachycardia circuit.
Regarding the ablation strategy, several options have been proposed by different working groups. These include ablation of late potentials (LP) and local abnormal ventricular activities (LAVA) [7, 8], identifying and ablating channels and performing scar “dechanneling” [9, 10], iso­lating the core of the scar [11, 12] and scar homogenization [1315]. In the above-presented patient, mapping of the tachycardia by creating an activation map during VT was not possible, due to the risk of hemodynamic compromise,
given his very severe LV dysfunction (LV EF% of 17%). Instead, the technique described by de Chillou etal. [1] using pacemapping during sinus rhythm was considered the best strategy is this case. We consider this to be very useful in cases where the target ventricular tachycardia is non­sustained, non-inducible, or not tolerated by the patient or when the activation map performed during VT is incomplete or needs conrmation. As presented in Case 14, the technique of pace­mapping during sinus rhythm requires compari­son between the QRS morphology resulted from local pacing at a specic site and the morphology of the VT recorded by the 12-lead surface ECG.Using the PASO correlation algorithm of the CARTO system, the correlation between these two morphologies can be estimated, and this can take values from 100% (in case of com­plete discordance between the 2) to 100% (per­fect match). Several points from areas located in the possible VT origin are paced at twice the dia­stolic threshold at the VT cycle length, and the percentage of correlation is represented on a CARTO map, with red color corresponding to the best match and violet to the poorest match. Orange, yellow, green, and blue colors represent intermediate matches. In the VT exit zone and close to it, there will be good correlations between the locally generated QRS morphology and the 12-lead VT morphology. This is due to the fact that the depolarization wavefront travels in the same direction during local pacing as during VT.In the VT entrance zone, there will be a poor correlation between the locally generated QRS morphology and the 12-lead VT morphology. This is due to the fact that the depolarization wavefront travels in opposite direction during local pacing and during VT, since during local pacing, the wavefront propagates faster from the entrance zone to the surrounding healthy myo­cardial tissue than during myocardial scar, where conduction velocity is signicantly decreased. According to de Chillou etal., regarding VT isth­muses, the best correlation percentages are found in the VT exit zones and isthmus exit part (89%±8% and 84%±7%, respectively), and the poorest correlations are found close to the scar border in the outer entrance zones (23%±28%),
262
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Halbwachs et al.
in the entrance zones (39% ± 34%), and in the entrance part of the isthmus (32%±26%).
Another important observation is related to the localization of the VT isthmus in this case. As in most patients with prior inferior wall myocar­dial infarction and peri-mitral VTs, the VT isth­mus was parallel to the mitral valve [16]. As described by de Chillou etal., the VT circuit is usually a dual-loop “gure of 8,” with one loop turning around the mitral annulus and the other around a line of anatomical or functional line of block, which represents the lower boundary of the VT isthmus. A minority of patients will have single-loop circuits, but these are less common than “gure of 8” circuits. In the experience of de Chillou etal., the average dimensions of the VT isthmus are 31 ± 7 mm (ranging from 18 to 41mm) long and 16±8mm (ranging from 6 to 36mm) wide.
In the present patient, RF ablation of the VT isthmus plus LAVA elimination rendered the VT non-inducible.
Learning Points
• Coronary artery disease with prior myo­cardial infarction is the most common cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease.
• Catheter ablation with the help of an electro-anatomical mapping system is a very good treatment option in patients with recurrent episodes of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia.
• In patients in whom the ventricular tachycardia is non-inducible during the ablation procedure, non-sustained or hemodynamically poorly tolerated, cre­ation of a pacemap during sinus rhythm can identify the critical components of the VT and allows performance of the ablation.
References
1. de Chillou C, Groben L, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, MagdiAbbas M, Zhang N, et al. Localizing the critical isthmus of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia: the value of pace-mapping during sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):175–81.
2. de Chillou C, Sellal JM, Magnin-Poull I.Pace mapping to localize the critical isthmus of ventricular tachycar­dia. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9(1):71–80.
3. Miller JM, Altemose GT, Jayachandran JV.Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Cardiol Rev. 2001;9(6):302–11.
4. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ven­tricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the preven­tion of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace. 2015;17(11):1601–87.
5. Maury P, Monteil B, Marty L, Duparc A, Mondoly P, Rollin A.Three-dimensional mapping in the elec­trophysiological laboratory. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;111(6–7):456–64.
6. Merino JL.Tools or toys? The 20-year anniversary of the nonuoroscopic mapping system dilemma. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70(9):690–3.
7. Sacher F, Lim HS, Derval N, Denis A, Berte B, Yamashita S, et al. Substrate mapping and ablation for ventricular tachycardia: the LAVA approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):464–71.
8. Jais P, Maury P, Khairy P, Sacher F, Nault I, Komatsu Y, et al. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modication in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012;125(18):2184–96.
9. Berruezo A, Fernandez-Armenta J, Andreu D, Penela D, Herczku C, Evertz R, et al. Scar dechanneling: new method for scar-related left ventricular tachycar­dia substrate ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(2):326–36.
10. Andreu D, Penela D, Acosta J, Fernandez-Armenta J, Perea RJ, Soto-Iglesias D, et al. Cardiac mag­netic resonance-aided scar dechanneling: inuence on acute and long-term outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(8):1121–8.
11. Santangeli P, Frankel DS, Marchlinski FE.End points for ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(5):949–60.
16 Case 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
263
12. Santangeli P, Marchlinski FE. Substrate mapping for unstable ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):569–83.
13. Briceno DF, Romero J, Gianni C, Mohanty S, Villablanca PA, Natale A, etal. Substrate ablation of ventricular tachycardia: late potentials, scar dechan­neling, local abnormal ventricular activities, Core isolation, and homogenization. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9(1):81–91.
14. Gokoglan Y, Mohanty S, Gianni C, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Gunes MF, et al. Scar homogenization versus limited-substrate ablation in patients with non-
ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycar­dia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18):1990–8.
15. Yagishita D, Ajijola OA, Vaseghi M, Nsair A, Zhou W, Yamakawa K, et al. Electrical homogenization of ventricular scar by application of collagenase: a novel strategy for arrhythmia therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(4):776–83.
16. de Chillou C, Lacroix D, Klug D, Magnin-Poull I, Marquie C, Messier M, etal. Isthmus characteristics of reentrant ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;105(6):726–31.
Case 17
https://t.me/medicina_free
RonanLe Bouar, FrédéricHalbwachs, ThomasRobein, CharlineDaval, SerbanSchiau, MihaelaCalcaianu, BergamotteThinot, andJacquesLevy
17
Case Presentation
An 83-year-old male patient with a past medical history of ischemic heart disease; severe stenosis of the proximal LAD treated with CABG (IMA­LAD) at the age of 52years; severe stenosis of the CX artery and of the rst marginal branch treated with PTCA + stent implantation at the age of 73years; intrastent restenosis of the CX artery and severe stenosis of the RCA, both treated with stent implantation at the age of 77years; LV EF% of 50%; dual-chamber pacemaker implanted at the age of 73years for symptomatic sinus node disease; upgrade of the device to a dual-chamber ICD at the age of 75years for the secondary pre­vention of sudden cardiac death due to repeated episodes of sustained monomorphic VT; ICD replacement for battery depletion at the age of 83years (Medtronic Evera MRI XT DR); isch­emic stroke at the age of 73years due to a 99% stenosis of the left common carotid artery treated with bypass graft; and chronic renal failure
R. Le Bouar (*) · C. Daval · S. Schiau M. Calcaianu · J. Levy Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr;
charline.daval@ghrmsa.fr; serban.schiau@ghrmsa.fr; mihaela.calcaianu@ghrmsa.fr; levyj@ghrmsa.fr
F. Halbwachs · T. Robein · B. Thinot Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France e-mail: Bergamotte.thinot@its.jnj.com
(GFR=40mL/min) presented to the cardiology department for repeated episodes of palpitations with sudden onset and offset, accompanied by dyspnea at rest and anxiety that had aggravated during the past 3days prior to his presentation at the hospital.
His cardiovascular risk factors were repre­sented by age (> 55years old), arterial hyperten­sion, and dyslipidemia. His medication at home consisted of atorvastatin 20 mg, bisoprolol 10mg, and aspirin 75mg.
At physical examination, his blood pressure was 113/76 mmHg, HR 76 bpm, H = 170 cm, W=62kg, and BMI of 21.45kg/m2, heart sounds were regular, there were a mild systolic murmur in the apical region, lung auscultation revealed bilateral basal crepitant rales, peripheral pulses were barely perceptible, there were mild bilateral edema of the lower limbs, and there were no signs of right heart failure.
His ECG is presented in Fig.17.1. A second ECG, recorded several minutes after his admit­tance, during an episode of palpitations is pre­sented in Fig.17.2.
His blood workup showed a Hb level of
11.8 g/dL, leukocytes 9.19 × 109/L, platelets 128×109/L, CRP 19mg/L, BUN 17.8mmol/L, creatinine 184 μmol/L, glycemia 5.2 mmol/L, Na+141mmol/L, K+ 3.9mmol/L, NT pro-BNP 15100 pg/mL, troponin 0.063 ng/mL (NV<0.042ng/mL), and TSH 2.03IU/L.
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_17
265