Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3651_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
30.08.2026
Размер:
51 Мб
Скачать
172
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.12 CARTO image in LAO 60° showing the bipolar voltage map of the RV next to the CT angiography image with the 3D reconstruction of the LV.In dark red, the CT angiography reconstruction of the coronary arteries. Note the absence of low­voltage areas at the level of the endocardial RV, present in red color, with the exception of a small area just below the level of the pulmonary valve
B. Bakouboula et al.
Fig. 11.13 Left panel: Radioscopy image in LL 90° showing the performance of pericardial puncture enabling pericardial access, with the needle (red arrow) entering the pericardial space, injecting a small amount of iodin­ated contrast agent inside the pericardial space (yellow). The ICD is visible with the coil at the level of the RV apex. Right panel: Radioscopy image of the heart in LAO
35° showing the Agilis Epi (Abbott©) sheath entering the pericardium, with the guidewire present inside the peri­cardium, performing several loops extending from the left cardiac border to the right cardiac border, demonstrating the presence of the guidewire inside the pericardium, not at the level of the RVOT.The ICD is visible with the coil at the level of the RV apex
11 C as e 11
https://t.me/medicina_free
173
Webster® SmartTouch SF catheter was intro­duced in a 9F 20cm vascular sheath in the right common femoral vein and advanced up to the right ventricle. The CARTO® 3 electro-anatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson) was used to guide mapping and ablation of the accessory pathway.
Ventricular pacing was carried out at twice the diastolic threshold using the Cardiac Stimulator of the Boston Scientic® system. Surface ECG and intracavitary ECGs were recorded by the Lab System Pro (Boston Scientic®).
First, a bipolar voltage map of the endocardial RV was created. This showed the presence of normal voltage in all areas of the RV with the exception of two small areas at the level of the anterior RV (Fig.11.14).
Programmed ventricular stimulation was then performed with the induction of a monomorphic VT, identical to the one from Fig. 11.9, which remained inducible at the end of the previous ablation procedure. Given the hemodynamically moderately well-tolerated nature of the tachycar­dia, inotropic support with norepinephrine was used at a dose of 0.1 μg/kg/min.
Mapping of the epicardial RVOT was then performed. The activation map of the RVOT dur­ing tachycardia elucidated its mechanism: a macro-reentry circuit at the level of the anterior RVOT, with an exit zone at the level of the junc­tion of the RVOT with the LVOT, an entrance zone at the level of the junction of the anterior RVOT with its lateral part, an isthmus parallel to the pulmonic valve and two outer loops, creating a “gure of 8” circuit (Fig.11.15).
Coronary angiography was subsequently per­formed, in order to rule out the proximity of a major coronary artery branch to the VT isthmus. No coronary artery was in close vicinity to the key components of the VT circuit (Fig.11.16).
The bipolar voltage map of the epicardium recorded during sinus rhythm is presented in Fig. 11.17. This showed the presence of a very wide area of low-voltage electrograms at the level of the RV (< 0.5 mV), demonstrating an advanced stage of the disease, with normal volt­age at the level of the LV.
RF ablation was performed in a power­controlled mode, with a target of 30 watts. Several RF lesions were deployed at the level of
Fig. 11.14 CARTO image in LAO 60° showing the bipo­lar voltage map of the RV next to the CT angiography image with the 3D reconstruction of the LV.Note the pres­ence of three low-voltage areas at the level of the endocar­dial RV, present in red/yellow color at the level of the anterior/septal part of the basal RVOT, probably as a con-
sequence of the previous catheter ablation procedure, since these had not been present before the rst RF abla­tion of the VT (see Fig.11.11 for comparison). The yellow star represents the VT endocardial exit site, determined by activation mapping (see Fig.11.15)
174
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. Bakouboula et al.
Fig. 11.15 CARTO image in AP view showing the epi­cardial activation map recorded during the clinical VT, in favor of a macro-reentry circuit, with its key components: the entrance zone (blue), the VT isthmus (light blue to violet), the exit zone (violet), and the two outer loops (vio­let to red to green and back to light blue). The yellow
the VT isthmus, creating a line perpendicular to it, transecting it.
The superposed epicardial and endocardial maps of the RV at the end of the ablation proce­dure are presented in Fig.11.18.
Programmed ventricular stimulation was per­formed with up to three extrastimuli, which was negative. ICD detection and therapies were reactivated.
There were no complications related to the procedure.
The ECG recorded after the ablation proce­dure is presented in Fig.11.19.
arrows are superposed for learning purpose. The yellow star represents the VT exit site. Of note, this is situated in an area just above the endocardial VT exit site, explaining the good pacemap obtained by pacing the RV endocar­dium in this area
The anti-arrhythmic treatment was stopped. Telemetry tracings did not record any VT recur­rence. The patient was discharged home 48h later.
ICD interrogation of up to 18months after the ablation procedure showed no VT recurrence.
Answers
Question 1: D.Ventricular tachycardia.
Question 2: E.Epicardial RVOT. Question 3: D.Perform epicardial VT
ablation.
11 C as e 11
https://t.me/medicina_free
175
Fig. 11.16 Left upper panel: Radioscopy image in anteroposterior view showing the anatomy of the left main coronary artery with its branches. There is no stenosis of the epicardial left coronary artery. The roving/ablation catheter is placed in the upper part of RVOT, and the Agilis Epi (Abbott ©) sheath is placed inside the pericar­dium. The ICD is visible in the upper right corner of the image and the ventricular lead is inserted at the level of
the RV apex. Right upper panel: Same projection as in the left upper panel, with the roving/ablation catheter at the level of the anterior and septal part of the RVOT. Left lower panel: Radioscopy image in anteroposterior view with the roving/ablation catheter positioned at the level of the endocardial exit site of the VT. Right lower panel: The roving/ablation catheter positioned at the level of the epicardial exit site of the VT
176
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. Bakouboula et al.
Fig. 11.17 CARTO image in LAO 30°, cranial 30° showing the epicardial bipolar voltage map of the RV and LV demonstrating the presence of a large area of low volt­age electrograms (< 0.5mV, in red color) situated at the level of the entire anterior and lateral wall of the RV.The CT angiography 3D reconstruction of the coronary arter­ies is superposed, with the LAD artery showing the delim­itation between the RV and the LV. Note the difference
Fig. 11.18 CARTO image in LAO 30°, cranial 35° showing the endocardial bipolar voltage map of the RV with superposed RF ablation lesions (pink/ red dots) deployed at the level of the epicardial anterior wall of the RV.The CT angiography 3D reconstruction of the LV is presented next to the RV bipolar voltage map. In glass color, the superposed epicardial anatomical map of the RV and the LV
between the RV and the LV epicardium voltage, with the LV having a wide area of normal (> 1.5mV) voltage (vio­let). The yellow star represents the VT exit site. The pink/ red dots represent RF ablation lesions deployed at the level of the epicardial VT isthmus and exit site. In glass color, the CT angiography 3D reconstruction of the RV, LV, and the aorta are superposed
11 C as e 11
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.19 A 12-lead ECG recorded after the ablation procedure
177
Commentary
The present case illustrates two catheter ablation procedures of two sustained monomorphic ven­tricular tachycardia in a 36-year-old male patient with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Several observations merit further discussion.
Ventricular arrhythmias represent the major manifestation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopa­thy. These range from isolated premature ven­tricular beats to sustained episodes of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular brillation. Clinical manifestations include palpitations, dyspnea, pre-syncope, syncope, and sudden cardiac death. Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is one of the primary causes of sudden cardiac death in young adults, accounting for 11% of causes and 22% of cases in competitive athletes [3].
The most common origin of sustained mono­morphic ventricular tachycardia is the RVOT. As discussed in the Commentary sec­tion of Case 10, other potential origins include the RV apex, the RV lateral wall, and LV sites.
The most common VT morphology in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is LBBB with superior axis (36.8%), followed by LBBB inferior axis (26.3%), LBBB indeterminate axis (21%), indeterminate morphology (13%), and RBBB pattern in 2.6% [4]. Recently, Marchlinski etal. [5] showed in their popula­tion of 110 patients with arrhythmogenic car­diomyopathy that TV with RBBB morphology can be found in 17% of patients and that the majority of these VTs actually originate in the right ventricle (62%). An early precordial QRS transition (in leads V2 of V3) with a superiorly and typically leftward axis deviation in the frontal plane is indicative of a RV origin, despite a RBBB morphology. The authors explain this by an exit VT site from the dilated RV close to the inferior LV septum.
Treatment options for arrhythmias in the con­text of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy include anti-arrhythmic drugs, namely, beta-blockers (in particular sotalol [6]), class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (ecainide [7]), and class III anti-
178
https://t.me/medicina_free
B. Bakouboula et al.
arrhythmic drugs (amiodarone [8]), alone or in association [7]. However, their efcacy is limited and side effects represent limitations in their widespread use. ICD implantation is currently indicated in patients with aborted SCD and hemodynamically poorly tolerated VT, in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated sustained VT, and may be considered in patients with one or more risk factors for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a life expectancy of at least 1year [9]. Besides these two treatment options, catheter ablation has emerged as an attractive strategy in reducing the VT arrhythmia burden and in reduc­ing the number of ICD discharges [10].
The most common approach method for VT ablation is the endocardial approach. However, this has been associated with a high acute failure rate and high recurrence rates in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, given the fre­quent epicardial nature of the arrhythmic sub­strate. An epicardial-only approach has been described, but a combined epicardial and endo­cardial approach is the most efcient ablation strategy in these patients. This has been associ­ated with a higher rate of acute and long-term success. The preferred strategy is scar dechannel­ing or scar homogenization [11].
In a recent meta-analysis conducted by Shen etal. including 24 studies on 717 patients [12], epicardial ablation of VT in patients with arrhyth­mogenic cardiomyopathy had an acute success rate of 89.8%, a long-term success evaluated after a follow-up period of 28.9months of 75.3%, with a major complication rate of 5.2%. When only the main ten studies were analyzed, com­pared to an endocardial-only approach, epicar­dial VT ablation signicantly decreased VT recurrence (OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.30–0.85, p=0.01), but with an increase in the major complication rate (OR 4.64, 95% CI 1.28–16.92, p=0.02) and with no signicant reduction in all-cause mortal­ity (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.09–8.31, p=0.9).
In our above-presented patient, the rst endocardial- only ablation procedure did not result in acute termination of VT. Programed ventricular stimulation demonstrated VT induc­ibility at the end of the procedure, and an epicar­dial substrate was considered to be the most
likely cause of acute ablation failure. The pres­ence of an epicardial substrate for the VT was identied during the second ablation procedure (Fig.11.14). The activation map of the RV epi­cardial surface demonstrated the VT isthmus in an area of low voltage of the epicardial RVOT.RF ablation of the VT substrate terminated the VT and rendered it non-inducible.
Learning Points
• Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia is a frequent manifestation in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
• Catheter ablation is a useful comple­ment to ICD implantation in the treat­ment of these patients.
• An epicardial approach is necessary in almost half of the patients in order to achieve acute success.
• A combined endocardial—epicardial approach has the highest success rate in the catheter-based treatment of these patients.
References
1. de Chillou C, Groben L, Magnin-Poull I, Andronache M, MagdiAbbas M, Zhang N, et al. Localizing the critical isthmus of postinfarct ventricular tachycardia: the value of pace-mapping during sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(2):175–81.
2. de Chillou C, Sellal JM, Magnin-Poull I.Pace mapping to localize the critical isthmus of ventricular tachycar­dia. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9(1):71–80.
3. Gemayel C, Pelliccia A, Thompson PD. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopa­thy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1773–81.
4. Marcus FI, Zareba W. The electrocardiogram in right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. How can the electrocardiogram assist in understanding the pathologic and functional changes of the heart in this disease? J Electrocardiol. 2009;42(2):136.e1–5.
5. Marchlinski DF, Tschabrunn CM, Zado ES, Santangeli P, Marchlinski FE.Right bundle branch block ventric­ular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy more commonly originates from the right ventricle: criteria for identifying chamber of ori­gin. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(2):163–71.
11 C as e 11
https://t.me/medicina_free
179
6. Wichter T, Borggrefe M, Haverkamp W, Chen X, Breithardt G. Efcacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dis­ease. Results in patients with inducible and non­inducible ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1992;86(1):29–37.
7. Ermakov S, Gerstenfeld EP, Svetlichnaya Y, Scheinman MM. Use of ecainide in combination antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with arrhyth­mogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(4):564–9.
8. Marcus GM, Glidden DV, Polonsky B, Zareba W, Smith LM, Cannom DS, etal. Efcacy of antiarrhyth­mic drugs in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardio­myopathy: a report from the North American ARVC registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(7):609–15.
9. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ven­tricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden
cardiac death: the task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the preven­tion of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Europace. 2015;17(11):1601–87.
10. Mathew S, Saguner AM, Schenker N, Kaiser L, Zhang P, Yashuiro Y, et al. Catheter ablation of ven­tricular tachycardia in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: a sequen­tial approach. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(5):e010365.
11. Romero J, Mejia-Lopez E, Manrique C, Lucariello R.Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC/D): a systematic literature review. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2013;7:97–114.
12. Shen LS, Liu LM, Zheng LH, Hu F, Hu ZC, Liu SY, et al. Ablation strategies for arrhythmo­genic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a system­atic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2020;17(11):694–703.
Case 12
https://t.me/medicina_free
FrédéricHalbwachs, RonanLe Bouar, MatthieuGeorge, TarekEl Nazer, LaurentJacquemin, LaurentDietrich, SerbanSchiau, andJacquesLevy
12
Case Presentation
A 40-year-old female patient with a history of remote inferior myocardial infarction at the age of 35 years (thrombotic occlusion of the right coronary artery in the second segment) treated with PTCA + stent implantation, ischemic car­diomyopathy with moderate to severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF of 36%), chronic total occlu­sion of the right coronary artery due to in-stent restenosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus, and former heroin addict on methadone, was
Supplementary Information The online version con­tains supplementary material available at https://doi.
org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 35579- 0_12.
F. Halbwachs (*) · M. George Biosense Webster, Mulhouse, France
R. Le Bouar · T. El Nazer · L. Jacquemin · L. Dietrich S. Schiau · J. Levy Cardiology Department, “Emile Muller” Hospital, Mulhouse, France e-mail: LEBOUARR@ghrmsa.fr;
tarek.elnazer@ghrmsa.fr; jacqueminl@ghrmsa.fr; laurent.dietrich@ghrmsa.fr; serban.schiau@ghrmsa.fr; levyj@ghrmsa.fr
admitted to the emergency department for an epi­sode of palpitations with sudden onset accompa­nied by dizziness, retrosternal chest pain, nausea, anxiety, and near syncope that had started 15min prior to her presentation at the hospital. Her pal­pitations had spontaneously stopped before arriv­ing in the emergency department. Her cardiovascular risk factors were represented by active smoking (20 pack-years) and type 2 diabe­tes mellitus. Her medication at home consisted of ramipril 1.25mg, spironolactone 12.5mg, meto­prolol long release 97 mg, pravastatin 60 mg, venlafaxine 75 mg, quetiapine LR 400 mg, paracetamol 3000 mg, hydroxychloroquine 400mg, prednisone 5mg, alprazolam 2mg, and mycophenolic acid 2000 mg. The patient was addressed to the cardiology department for fur­ther investigations and treatment.
At physical examination, her blood pressure was 105/67 mmHg, HR 72 bpm, SpO2 96% breathing room air, H=1.60m, W=63kg, and BMI = 24.6kg/m2, heart sounds were regular, there was a mild systolic murmur in the mitral auscultation region, lung auscultation was clear, and there were no signs of right heart failure.
Her ECG at presentation is showed in Fig.12.1.
Her biological workup showed a Hb level of
12.3g/dL, leukocytes 6.03 × 109/L, platelets 233 × 109/L, CRP 5mg/L, BUN 5.6mmol/L, creati­nine 70 μmol/L, glycemia 4.7 mmol/L, Na + 136 mmol/L, K+ 3.9 mmol/L, cTnI
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 L. Muresan (ed.), Clinical Cases in Cardiac Electrophysiology: Ventricular Arrhythmias,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35579-0_12
181
182
https://t.me/medicina_free
F. Halbwachs et al.
Fig. 12.1 A 12-lead ECG at admittance to the hospital showing sinus rhythm with a heart rate of 72bpm; QRS axis at 35°; Q waves in leads II, III, and aVF suggestive
Fig. 12.2 A 3-lead ECG telemetry tracing showing wide QRS complex tachycardia with a heart rate of 179bpm, RBBB, and superior axis, with A:V dissociation (P waves indicated by red arrows), in favor of ventricular tachycardia
0.150 ng/mL, INR 2.1, NT pro-BNP 1997 pg/ mL, TSH 1.04IU/L, total cholesterol 108mg/dL, HDL 42 mg/dL, LDL 60 mg/dL, and triglycer­ides 88mg/dL.
While in the cardiology department, the patient presented another episode of palpitations, which was recorded by telemetry monitoring (Fig.12.2).
Transthoracic echocardiography was per­formed, which demonstrated a non-dilated LV, with akinesia of the inferior LV wall and with severe systolic dysfunction, LVEF of 33%
of remote inferior myocardial infarction; and negative T waves in leads II, III, aVF, and V3–V6, suggestive of pos­sible infero-lateral ischemia
(Fig. 12.3). It also showed a cardiac output of
3.7 L/min, non-elevated LV lling pressure, absence of LV hypertrophy, mild mitral regurgita­tion, a non-dilated right ventricle, mild tricuspid regurgitation with sPAP of 24mmHg, absence of pericardial uid, and absence of LV thrombus.
In order to rule out ongoing myocardial isch­emia, given the diagnostic of ventricular tachy­cardia and the elevated troponin level, coronary angiography was performed, which demonstrated chronic total occlusion of the RCA in its proxi­mal segment (Fig.12.4).