Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_605_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
X
- •Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
- •Copyright
- •Contents
- •Foreword
- •Acknowledgments
- •2.1.3 Attrition and Erosion
- •2.2 Esophagus
- •2.2.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.2.2 Functional Task
- •2.2.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.2.4 Cancer
- •2.2.5 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •2.2.5.1 Internal (Endoscopic) Reinforcement
- •Reference
- •2.1 The Gastrointestinal Tract: an Overview
- •2.1.1 Structural Defects
- •2.1.2 Functional Defects
- •2.2.5.2 Implants
- •2.2.5.3 Electrical Stimulation
- •2.3 Stomach
- •2.3.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.3.2 Functional Task
- •2.3.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.3.4 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •2.4 Duodenum and Small Intestine
- •2.4.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.4.2 Functional Task
- •2.4.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.4.4 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •2.5 Colon and Rectum
- •2.5.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.5.2 Functional Task
- •2.5.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.5.4 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •2.6 Liver/Gallbladder
- •2.6.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.6.2 Functional Task
- •2.6.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.6.4 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •2.7 Pancreas
- •2.7.1 Anatomical Description
- •2.7.2 Functional Task
- •2.7.3 Disorders and Diseases
- •2.7.4 Biomedical Engineering Aspects
- •References
- •3.1 Definition
- •3.2 Basic Surgical Principles
- •3.2.1 Wound Healing, Wound Treatment
- •3.2.2 Indications for Surgery
- •3.2.2.1 Emergency Surgery
- •3.2.2.2 Urgent Surgery
- •3.2.2.3 Semielective Surgery
- •3.2.2.4 Elective Surgery
- •3.2.3 Steps of the Operation
- •3.2.3.1 Positioning on the OR Table
- •3.2.3.2 Incision
- •3.2.3.3 Exposure
- •3.2.3.4 Dissection
- •3.2.3.5 Resection
- •3.2.3.6 Specimen Retrieval
- •3.2.3.7 Viscerosynthesis/Reconstruction
- •3.2.3.8 Wound Closure
- •3.3 Structure and Organization of Surgical Care
- •3.3.1 Outpatient Surgical Care
- •3.3.2 In-Hospital Surgical Care
- •3.3.2.1 Emergencies in Visceral Surgery
- •3.3.2.2 Elective Surgery
- •3.3.2.3 Hospital Beds
- •4.1 Asepsis
- •4.1.1 The Detection of Antisepsis
- •4.1.2 Reprocessing of Surgical Instruments
- •4.1.3 Sterilization
- •4.2 Anesthesia
- •4.2.1 Sedation
- •4.3 Dedicated Workplace: The Operating Room
- •4.3.1 The Surgical Workplace
- •4.3.2 Core Elements of the Surgical Site
- •4.3.3 Stationary Systems
- •4.3.4 Typical Surgical Positions in Visceral Surgery
- •4.3.5 Maximum Load
- •4.3.6 Cleaning and Disinfection
- •4.3.7 Operating Lights
- •4.3.8 Peripheral Devices
- •4.3.9 Structural Preconditions
- •References
- •5.1 Conventional Radiology
- •5.1.1 Technical Aspects
- •5.1.2 Generation and Detection of X-Rays
- •5.1.3 Projection Radiography
- •5.1.4 Real-Time Radiography
- •5.2 Computed Tomography
- •5.2.1 Principle of Computed Tomography
- •5.2.2 Multislice Computed Tomography
- •5.2.3 Cone Beam Computed Tomography
- •5.2.4 Dual-Energy Computed Tomography
- •5.3 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5.3.1 General Considerations
- •5.3.2 Technical Insights
- •5.3.3 Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5.3.4 Magnets
- •5.3.5 Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5.3.6 Magnetic Particle Imaging
- •5.2.5 Dual-Source Computed Tomography
- •5.2.6 Phase-Contrast Computed Tomography
- •5.2.7 X-Ray Microtomography
- •5.2.8 Electron-Beam Computed Tomography
- •5.4 Diagnostic Ultrasound
- •5.4.1 History
- •5.4.2 Transducer Arrays
- •5.4.3 US Application in Visceral Medicine
- •5.4.4 Doppler Imaging
- •5.4.5 US Elastography
- •5.4.5.1 Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging
- •5.4.5.2 Shear Wave Elastography
- •5.4.5.3 Shear Wave Dispersion Ultrasound Vibrometry
- •5.4.6 3D/4D Ultrasound
- •5.4.7 Ultrasound Computed Tomography
- •5.5 Nuclear Imaging Systems
- •5.5.1 Gamma Camera
- •5.5.2 Positron Emission Tomography
- •5.5.3 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography
- •5.5.4 Conclusion
- •5.6 Advanced Optical Systems
- •5.6.1 Photodetectors
- •5.6.2 Optical Coherence Tomography
- •5.6.2.1 Time-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
- •5.6.2.2 Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
- •5.6.2.3 Fourier-Domain Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography
- •5.6.3 Optical Fluorescence Imaging
- •5.6.4 Hyperspectral Imaging
- •5.6.5 Diffuse Optical Imaging (Near-Infrared Optical Tomography)
- •5.6.6 Confocal Laser Scanning
- •5.6.7 Photoacoustic Imaging
- •5.6.8 Conclusion
- •5.7 Endoscopy
- •5.7.1 Rigid Endoscopes
- •5.7.2 Flexible Diagnostic Endoscopy
- •5.7.2.1 Flexible Scopes
- •5.7.2.1.1 The Handle
- •5.7.2.1.2 Connection to the Control/Supply Unit
- •5.7.2.2 Control/Support Unit
- •5.7.2.2.1 Imaging/Illumination
- •5.7.2.2.2 Suction/Irrigation/Insufflation
- •5.7.2.3 Instruments
- •5.7.2.4 The Endoscopic Trolley
- •5.7.2.5 Instrument Reprocessing
- •5.7.2.6 Clinical Applications
- •5.7.2.6.1 Colonoscopy
- •5.7.2.6.2 Enteroscopy, “Deep Endoscopy”
- •5.7.3 Autofluorescence Imaging Endoscopy
- •5.7.4 Computed Virtual Chromoendoscopy/Narrow Band Imaging (NBI)
- •5.7.5 Confocal Endomicroscopy
- •5.7.6 Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography
- •5.7.7 Endoscopic Ultrasound
- •5.7.8 Wireless Capsule Endoscopy
- •5.7.9 Conclusion
- •5.8 Hybrid Systems
- •5.8.1 Real-Time Virtual Sonography
- •5.8.2 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
- •5.8.3 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography
- •5.8.4 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5.8.5 Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •5.8.6 X-Ray/MRI
- •5.8.7 Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography Ultrasound Imaging System
- •5.8.8 Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography and Positron Detection
- •5.8.9 Microscope Integrated Optical Coherence Tomography and Optical Coherence Microscope
- •5.9 Intraoperative Diagnostic Procedures
- •5.9.1 Ultrasound
- •5.9.2 Conventional Radiography (C-Arm)
- •5.9.3 Isocentric Radiography
- •5.9.4 Intraoperative Volume Data Acquisition
- •5.9.5 Intraoperative Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- •References
- •6.1 “Classical” Surgical Instruments for Conventional Surgery
- •6.1.1 Surgical Knives/Scalpels
- •6.1.2 Forceps/Tweezers
- •6.1.2.1 Basic Forceps Designs
- •6.1.3 Scissors
- •6.1.4 Fixation Instruments/Locking Forceps
- •6.1.4.1 Hemostats
- •6.1.4.2 Vascular Clamps
- •6.1.5 Retractors
- •6.1.6 Self-Retaining Retractors
- •6.1.7 Needle Holders
- •6.1.8 Others
- •6.2 Electrosurgery
- •6.2.1 Thermal Low-Temperature Effects
- •6.2.2 Hyperthermia and Devitalization
- •6.2.3 Thermal Coagulation
- •6.2.4 Thermal Desiccation
- •6.2.5 Thermal High-Temperature Effects
- •6.2.6 Carbonization
- •6.2.7 Vaporization
- •6.2.8 Principles of Electrosurgery
- •6.2.9 Physical Theories of Electrosurgery
- •6.2.10 Electrosurgical Techniques
- •6.2.11 Monopolar Technique
- •6.2.12 Electrosurgical Coagulation and Desiccation (Hemostasis)
- •6.2.12.1 Impedance-Controlled Electrocoagulation
- •6.2.12.2 Argon Plasma Coagulation
- •6.2.13 Electrosurgical Cutting
- •6.2.14 Electrosurgical Unit
- •6.2.15 Clinical Aspects of Electrosurgery
- •6.3 Ultrasound Dissection
- •6.4 Water Jet
- •6.5 Stapling Devices
- •6.5.1 Linear staplers
- •6.5.2 Linear Cutting Devices
- •6.5.3 Circular Staplers
- •6.6 Biomaterials
- •6.6.1 Surgical Suture Materials
- •6.6.1.1 Absorbability
- •6.6.1.2 Internal Structure
- •6.6.2 Surgical Mesh
- •References
- •7.1 Basics
- •7.1.1 Pneumoperitoneum
- •7.1.1.1 Creation of the Necessary Space
- •7.1.2 The Veress Needle
- •7.1.2.1 Insertion of the Veress Needle
- •7.1.3 Gas Insufflators
- •7.1.3.1 Insufflation Device
- •7.1.3.2 Creation of the Pneumoperitoneum
- •7.1.4 Trocars
- •7.1.4.1 Reusable Trocars
- •7.1.4.2 Disposable Trocars
- •7.1.4.3 Hybrid Systems
- •7.1.5 Visualization
- •7.1.5.1 Laparoscopes (Laparoscopic Telescopes)
- •7.1.5.1.1 Advanced Laparoscopes
- •7.1.5.1.2 Future Developments
- •7.1.5.2 Laparoscopic Cameras
- •7.1.5.3 Laparoscopic Image Processors (Camera Control Unit)
- •7.1.5.4 Monitors
- •7.1.5.5 3D Endoscopy
- •7.1.6 Light Source and Transmission
- •7.1.6.1 Halogen Lamps
- •7.1.6.2 Xenon
- •7.1.6.3 Halide Lamps
- •7.1.6.4 Condensing Lens
- •7.1.6.5 Illumination Control
- •7.1.6.6 Light Cables
- •7.1.7 Suction/Irrigation Device
- •7.1.8 Documentation
- •7.1.9 Equipment Cart
- •7.2 Hand Instruments
- •7.2.1 Forceps/Graspers
- •7.2.2 Dissectors
- •7.2.3 Scissors
- •7.2.4 Needle Drivers
- •7.2.5 Retractors
- •7.2.6 Laparoscopic Electrosurgery
- •7.2.7 Clips and Clip Appliers
- •7.2.8 Laparoscopic Stapling Devices
- •7.2.9 Laparoscopic Ultrasound Dissection
- •7.2.10 Impedance-Guided Dissection
- •7.3 Minilaparoscopic Procedures
- •7.4 Mono-Port (Single Port) Surgery
- •7.4.1 Trocars
- •7.4.2 Hand Instruments
- •7.4.2.1 The SPIDER Surgical System
- •7.4.2.2 Critical Comments and Outlook
- •References
- •8.1 “Operative” Endoscopes
- •8.1.1 Upper Gastrointestinal Scopes, Colonoscopes
- •8.1.2 Side-Viewing Duodenoscopes
- •8.2 Instruments
- •8.2.1 Knives
- •8.2.2 Hooks
- •8.2.3 Snares
- •8.2.4 Injection Needles
- •8.2.5 Forceps/Graspers
- •8.3 Clips
- •8.3.1 Standard endoscopic clips
- •8.3.2 Over-the-Scope-Clip
- •8.4 Clinical Applications
- •8.4.1 Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- •8.4.1.1 Injection Therapy
- •8.4.1.2 Thermal Hemostasis
- •8.4.1.2.1 Contact Methods
- •8.4.1.2.2 Noncontact Methods
- •8.4.1.3 Mechanical Methods
- •8.4.2 Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
- •8.4.3 Endoscopic Resection of Neoplastic Tissue
- •8.4.3.1 Snare Polypectomy
- •8.4.3.2 Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- •8.4.3.3 Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
- •8.4.4 Endoscopic Interventions on the Bile Duct (ERCP)
- •8.4.5 Gastrointestinal Stenting
- •8.4.5.1 Bougienage and Balloon Dilatation
- •8.4.6 Outlook
- •References
- •9.1 Combined Laparoscopic-Endoscopic Procedures (CLEP)
- •9.1.1 Indications
- •9.1.2 Esophagus
- •9.1.3 Stomach
- •9.1.4 Duodenum
- •9.1.5 Colon
- •9.1.6 Contraindications
- •9.1.7 Tumor Localization
- •9.1.8 Defining the Line of Section (Margin)
- •9.1.9 Selection of the Appropriate Technique for Tumor Resection
- •9.1.10 Specimen Retrieval
- •9.1.11 Leak Test
- •9.1.12 Technical Considerations
- •9.2 Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery—Surgery Without Visible Scars
- •9.2.1 Access into the Abdominal Cavity
- •9.2.1.1 Transgastric Approach
- •9.2.1.2 Transurethral Approach
- •9.2.1.3 Transvaginal Approach
- •9.2.1.4 Transcolonic Approach
- •9.2.2 Intestinal Closure
- •9.2.2.1 Clips
- •9.2.2.2 Suturing Devices
- •9.2.3 Flexible Staplers
- •9.2.4 Plicator-Like Devices
- •9.2.5 Rivets
- •9.3 Spatial Orientation
- •9.4 Illumination
- •9.5 Fog/Mist Elimination
- •9.6 Stabilization of the Horizon
- •9.7 View Extension
- •9.8 Three-Dimensional Stereoscopy
- •9.9 Multifunctional Endoscopes and Mechanical Platforms
- •9.9.1 Endosamurai
- •9.9.2 Anubis
- •9.9.3 SPOT (Single Port Overtube System), Technische Universität München
- •9.10 Outlook
- •References
- •10.1 Computerized Systems
- •10.1.1 Active Camera Holders
- •10.1.1.1 Automated Endoscope System for Optimal Positioning
- •10.1.1.2 Currently Available Active Camera Holders
- •10.1.1.3 Conclusion and Further Development
- •10.1.2.1 Zeus
- •10.1.2.2 DaVinci
- •10.1.2.3 New Developments
- •10.1.2.3.1 Titan SPORT
- •10.1.2.3.2 Senhance Surgical Robot System
- •10.1.2.3.3 MiroSurge
- •10.1.3 Computerized Platforms for NOTES
- •10.1.3.1 Electromechanically Controlled Conventional Endoscopes
- •10.1.3.2 Systems With Elements of Autonomous Locomotion
- •10.1.3.2.1 Endotic
- •10.1.3.2.2 Aer-O-Scope
- •10.1.3.3 Robotically Driven Instrumentation
- •10.1.3.3.1 Single Access and Transluminal Robotic Assistant for Surgeons (ISIS-STRAS)
- •10.1.3.3.2 C-SPOT
- •10.1.3.3.3 MASTER (Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot)
- •10.1.3.3.4 Endomina
- •10.2 Nontethered (Cable-Less) Systems/Modular Assembling Reconfigurable Miniature Robots
- •10.2.1 ARES
- •10.2.2 ARAKNES
- •10.3 Special Aspects of Roboterized Surgery
- •10.3.1 Haptic Feedback
- •References
- •11.1 Optical Tracking Systems
- •11.2 Electromagnetic Tracking Systems
- •11.3 Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors
- •11.4 Radio-Based Tracking Systems
- •11.4.1 Radio-Frequency Identification Devices
- •11.4.2 RFID Applications in Health Care
- •11.4.3 Bluetooth
- •11.4.4 Wi-Fi
- •11.4.5 ZigBee
- •11.4.6 Ultra-Wide Band
- •11.4.7 RuBee
- •11.5 Acoustic Tracking Systems
- •11.6 Inertial Tracking Systems
- •11.7 Others
- •11.7.1 Depth Maps, 3D Surface Reconstruction
- •11.7.2 Passive Methods
- •11.7.2.1 Stereoscopy
- •11.7.3 Monocular Shape-From-x
- •11.7.4 Simultaneous Localization and Mapping
- •11.7.5 Active Methods
- •11.7.5.1 Time-of-Flight (ToF)
- •11.7.5.2 Structured Light (Color-Coded Triangulation)
- •11.8 Strengths and Weaknesses of Real-Time 3D Surface Reconstruction Methods
- •References
- •12.1 Hospital Information Systems
- •12.1.1 Specialty-Specific Extensions
- •12.1.1.1 Picture Archiving and Communication System
- •12.1.1.2 Others
- •12.1.2 Health Informatics On-Site
- •12.1.2.1 HIS in the Outpatients (Preadmission) Department
- •12.1.2.2 HIS in the Surgical Floor
- •12.1.2.3 HIS for Multidisciplinary Conferences
- •12.1.2.4 HIS in the OR
- •12.1.2.5 HIS and Quality of Care
- •12.1.2.6 Data Mining
- •12.2 Surgical Telematics/”Telesurgery”
- •12.2.1 Teleconsultation
- •12.2.2 Telepresence
- •12.2.3 Telesurgery
- •References
- •13.2 Cadaver Studies
- •13.3 Live Animal Training

181Diagnostic Procedures
disease by coupling fluorophobes to specific antibodies, and highresolution in vivo morphological diagnosis
[169]. Fields of ongoing
research are the development of molecular markers for in vivo immunohistochemistry and the application of confocal microscopy to intraabdominal organs in humans. Confocal endomicroscopy is evolving as a novel
technique for rapid intravital diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplastic diseases at the microscopic level, and has the potential to allow molecular
imaging in humans in the future
[169].
Dual-axis confocal microscopy is seen as the major technological
improvement of CLS, and is applicable in endoscopy. Dual-axis confocal
endomicroscopy has the ability to perform deep 3D optical sectioning
using simple and inexpensive optical components and light sources
[173].
As a completely new application, confocal endomicroscopy could play
a central role in the emerging area of telepathology.
5.7.6 Endoscopic Optical Coherence Tomography
The technical details of OCT are described in Section 5.6.2: Optical
Coherence Tomography.
Endoscopic imaging probes are key devices for internal highresolution OCT scanning of luminal structures and hollow organs. The
modalities usually find application in early-state or precancer detection in
the urinary and gastrointestinal tract, cardiology, and in examining other
microstructural anatomy and features in places like the ears
parts of the head and neck are also in the range of application—for
instance, when patients are undergoing surgeries in the upper respiratory
organs
[174176]. OCT is a powerful imaging technology because it
provides real-time imaging in situ without the need for tissue excision
like in conventional biopsy. OCT can be employed in capsule endoscopy,
and a number of different devices have been introduced that can be distinguished by the case that encloses the technical components: rigid
endoscopes such as biopsy needles, flexible endoscopic devices for uses
like gastrointestinal imaging, and catheters for intravascular examinations
[86,177]. The integration of OCT in clinical procedures benefits signifi-
cantly from OCT being fiber-based. In situations where OCT finds
application in a clinical environment, it is of high importance that the
technical setup remains operational or that applicability can be restored
within minutes after use or after it has been moved inside the hospital
environment.
[174]. Other

182
Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Figure 5.54 Stationary-fiber rotary probe with unobstructed 360 degrees view for
OCT. From Chang S, Murdock E, Mao Y, Flueraru C, Disano J. Stationary-fiber rotary
probe with unobstructed 360° view for optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2011;36
(22):43924.
As mentioned, OCT can be applied in rigid/flexible endoscopes to
bring the high-resolution properties of OCT to internal imaging
(
Fig. 5.54).
Flexible endoscopic OCT has great potential, and is still finding application in many different fields of internal imaging. These fields extend
from cancer diagnosis in the gastrointestinal and urinary tract and examinations of the respiratory organs to identify issues like reductions in gas
exchange efficiency to intravascular imaging
[86,179]. Rotary probes
with a diameter of approximately 1 mm and a transparent housing are
inserted into the ROI either noninvasively or invasively. In intravascular
OCT, a thin flexible tube or catheter is pushed in and pulled back inside
the artery
[97]. As with the other devices, the catheter also has a small
rotating tip from which the light is emitted in order to generate circumferential OCT images of the insides of blood vessels
[178].
Biopsy needles are another way to enable transcutaneous micron scale
OCT. They can be inserted into solid tissue and organs to allow imaging
of their internal microstructures with minimal trauma
[180]. They suit a
variety of different applications in which transdermal OCT imaging is
required, such as in mammographic cancer detection
[86]. Biopsy needles
for OCT usually consist of a needle-shaped housing defining a bore, in
which an optical fiber is positioned. Parts of the needle housing are transparent to allow a beam director to emit light outward and receive the
backscattered light. A motor or other actuating device again causes
motion to move or rotate parts of or the entire optical fiber and beam
director in order to allow a scanning of the specimen
[181].

183Diagnostic Procedures
Strengths and Weaknesses
This technology is of special interest because of the high image and
depth resolution provided by OCT imaging. This gives it advantages over
standard endoscopy that can only visualize surface features, making it a
valuable tool for detecting conditions like prevalent esophageal, stomach,
and colon cancer
[175].
Conventional procedures like MRI or US do not have a sufficient
resolution to identify atherosclerotic plaque at an early stage
provides a resolution of approximately 10 µm
compared to intravascular US
[86], enabling it to provide additional
structural information as seen in the images below
[33], which is much higher
[182,183] (Fig. 5.55).
[94]. OCT
Endoscopic OCT (EOCT) has also become a very valuable tool in
gastrointestinal imaging, with a wide range of applications. One of the
main advantages in most of its applications remains the fact that it can
be used where excisional biopsy would be hazardous or impossible,
providing information similar to that g ained from histology
[94]
(Table 5.20).
Figure 5.55 Comparison of intravascular US (left) and intraaorticoptical coherence
tomography (right). From Tahara S, Morooka T, Wang Z, Bezerra HG, Rollins AM, Simon
DI, et al. Intravascular optical coherence tomography detection of atherosclerosis and
inflammation in murine aorta. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2012;32(5):11507.
Table 5.20 Key facts on EOCT
Typical applications Strengths and
weaknesses
Cardiovascular
medicine
Gastroenterology
Oncology
High resolution,
wide range of
applications
Low depth
penetration
Recent
developments
High frame rates
Better
reconstruction
Research potential
and future trends
Integration of F-F
OCT setup
Miniaturization
Avoidance of
direct contact to
the tissue

184 Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Recent Developments and Current Research
Catheter-based OCT has been made commercially available worldwide, and has found an active user base that is continuously increasing
[33]. The latest devices that have been introduced allow imaging with
frame rates up to 400 fps with a diameter at the tip of 1.1 mm. During
ex vivo testing, complete 3D volumetric images of an entire coronary
artery were achieved at a pull-back speed of 100 mm/s
[95].
Further more, recent advances have been made in reconstructional algorithms, providing enhanced imaging of stent struts among other things
[184]. Sophisticated data fusion methodologies with other imaging
modalities to help further understanding of plaque characteristics and
vessel pathophysiology are also of great potential
[185].
The standard F-F OCT setup did not match miniaturization requirements for in situ needle imaging. Therefore, a new development has been
introduced where an external interferometer processing the in-depth scan
information is coupled with an internal common-path interferometer at
the tip that collects the backscattering light from the tissue. This makes it
possible to bring full-field technology into optical needle-biopsy, providing resolutions of almost 1 µm and revealing information about malignant
tissue en-face and on a cellular level
[186]. Other superminiaturized opti-
cal biopsy needles capable of acquiring 3D OCT images have also been
demonstrated, and achieve an outer diameter of 0.31 mm by using an allfiber probe. The astigmatism ratio was brought down to 1.8, resulting in
a working distance of 300 µm and a depth-of-field of 550 µm
[187].
Another current challenge in EOCT is the implementation of optics
that avoid direct contact with inflamed tissue in imaging areas like the
tympanic membrane. A possible approach to this problem could be an
extended working distance by allowing manual adjustments in focus
[174].
The high sensitivity and depth resolution might allow EOCT to substitute for several biopsy applications on a broad basis, and reduce the role
of conventional endoscopy in general
[188].
5.7.7 Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a technique combining endoscopy and
US in order to obtain images and information from the digestive tract
and the respiratory system and their surrounding tissue and organs
EUS has the ability to identify the component layers of the bowel
wall, which can be used for the staging of gastrointestinal cancer
[189].
[190].

Diagnostic Procedures
185
In addition to the evaluation of esophageal, gastric, and rectal cancer,
EUS is mainly used for the assessment of pancreatic diseases, but other
fields of application are under investigation
[191]. Other uses of EUS
include studying blood flow and guiding biopsies such as fine needle aspiration, in which tissue samples can be obtained by passing a special needle
into tissue, lymph nodes, or suspicious tumors
The technical principles of diagnostic US are described in
[192].
Section 5.4:
Diagnostic Ultrasound.
In EUS, the endoscope is inserted into the respiratory system or into
the upper or lower digestive tract and the US transducer generates highquality images of the organs inside the body
[189]. EUS probes consist of
a small US transducer, which is installed on the tip of an endoscope
(
Fig. 5.56). Two different designs are available. Linear probes consist of a
number of transducers in multiple rows, providing a segmental image of
the anatomy. Radical probes deliver a 360 degrees panorama of the anatomical environment. The endoscope has a flexible shaft with a central
wire, which is responsible for rotating the mechanical transducer. It is surrounded by oil, which serves as an acoustic interf ace with tissue,
Figure 5.56 (A) Tip of a linear EUS probe; (B) linear EUS image; (C) tip of a rotating
scanner; (D) radial EUS image. All from MITI.

186 Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
providing 360 degrees imaging perpendicular to the axis of the probe.
Depending on the purpose, EUS probes range from 2 to 2.9 mm in
diameter for miniature probes applicable through the endoscope working
channel to 12 mm for echoendoscopes, 12 to 30 MHz in frequency, and
170 to 220 cm in length
[193].
Strengths and Weaknesses
Images obtained by EUS are more accurate and more detailed than
those obtained by conventional US due to the proximity of the EUS
transducer to the tissue of interest. EUS offers further a high accuracy in
detecting small lesions and assessing the size of tumors, and helps the
surgeons to determine the extent of spread of certain cancers
[189].
Recent Developments and Current Research
EUS is a relatively new diagnostic tool and is still in its development
stage (
Table 5.21). Research concerning EUS involves increasing US
image quality and finding more sophisticated interventional endoscopic
devices
[194]. A recent development is the combination of real-time elas-
tography with EUS. This relatively new technique allows the evaluation
of tissue stiffness with the intent of better characterizing lesions during
EUS examinations
[195].
In the future, endoscopy is expected to become even more relevant.
Numerous technological enhancements and a general trend in medicine
toward minimally invasive diagnostics and surgery support the growing
relevance of endoscopy and EUS.
5.7.8 Wireless Capsule Endoscopy
Capsule endoscopy is a technology that uses a swallowed video capsule to
take photographs of the inside of the gastrointestinal tract: examinations
of the esophagus, stomach, colon, and the small and large intestines are
the main applications. Conventional endoscopes are inserted transorally or
Table 5.21 Key facts of EUS
Typical
applications
Gastroenterologic
and pulmonary
oncology
Strengths and
weaknesses
Accurate and
detailed
images
High
penetration
depth
Recent
developments
Combination of
real-time EUS
and
elastography
Research
potential and
Increasing image
quality
More
interventional
devices

Diagnostic Procedures
187
transanally, which can be undesirable for the patient, especially as the
small intestine can be very difficult to reach during a classic endoscopic
examination. Wireless capsule endoscopes (WCE) are rapidly emerging
devices that help to overcome the possible discomfort of oral or anal
insertion from a classic endoscope and allow easier access to narrow parts
in the gastrointestinal tract. The first capsule endoscopes were developed
in the middle of the 1990s and were approved for clinical use at the
beginning of the 21st century
the gold standard in evaluating diseases in the small intestine
[196]. Since then, they have emerged to be
[197],but
WCEs are also suited for investigating other parts of the gastrointestinal
tract. In terms of application, the most common indications include
bleedings in the gastrointestinal tract and Crohn’s diseases, but cancer
detection, especially in the small intestine, is also possible.
The capsule has a size of around 26 mm 3 11 mm
[196]. The essential
components are inside an ingestible coating with an optical dome, behind
which LEDs are situated to provide the necessary lighting. An image sensor translates the signals acquired through a short-focus lens, which are
later processed by a microcontrol unit (
Fig. 5.57).
The information is then transmitted via a radiofrequency transmitter
to electrodes placed on the abdomen of the patient. Finally, the images
are stored in a receiving box as seen in
comes from a cell battery inside the capsule
Fig. 5.58. The necessary energy
[199].
At the beginning of the procedure, the capsule is swallowed by t he
patient after the receiving sensors are placed on their abdomen and
Figure 5.57 Small intestine capsule endoscope. From Olympus Press Center. Small
intestinal capsule endoscope. Available from ,
press_centre/press_releases/medical/small_intestinal_capsule_endoscope_.jsp?view 5 img
2013 [accessed 23.09.16].
https://www.olympus.de/corporate/de/
. ;

188
Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Figure 5.58 Capsule endoscope image receiving box. From MITI.
connected to the data recorder. The capsule travels through the whole
gastrointestinal tract, dr iven by peristalsis. During that time the patient
can move freely and co ntinue with his/her daily routines. Of n ote,
50,00060,000 dig ital images are acquired and sent to t he data
recorder worn around the chest. The images are then a nalyze d in a
workstation after the patient returns to the clinic. The capsule is disposable and usually passes out of the p atient’s gastrointestinal t ract
unnoticed. It is possible to a pply the procedure in children as young as
2yearsold
Real-time imaging is also feasible
[196].
[200], but in WCE only 2D images
are acquired. Therefore, 3D reconstruction algorithms are employed in
order to gain 3D information and display of the wall of the gastrointestinal tract. One possible approach is reconstruction using the so-called
shape from shading technique
are extracted from differences in gray shades
if as little information as only one picture is available
[201], where surface and depth information
[202]. It can be applied even
[203].
Strengths and Weaknesses
WCE overcomes the problem of conventional tools not being able to
conveniently explore the complete gastrointestinal tract
[201], especially

Table 5.22 Key facts on WCE
Typical applications Strengths
and
weaknesses
Recent
developments
189Diagnostic Procedures
Research
potential and
future trends
Gastroenterology
(especially the small
intestine)
Increased
patient
comfort
Accesses
difficult
Low energy
supply
Low frame
rates
Introduction
of first
locomotion
Wireless power
supply
Energy saving
components
Better
locomotion
the small intestine, where conventional endoscopy carries the risk
of intestinal perforation and cross-contamination. The procedure is
completely pain-free for the patient and is considered rather safe with a
complication rate of 13%. The most feared complication is capsule
retention
removal
[204], which can theoretically lead to the need for surgical
[197] (Table 5.22).
The disposability of the capsule has the advantage of improving
hygiene. In conventional gastrointestinal screening, sterilization can be a
major concern if the same endoscope is used in multiple persons.
Compared to conventional endoscopes, the low frame rate of
218 fps, low image resolution, and limited working time due to the
constraints in energy supply are limiting factors
shorten the working time to approximately 9 hours
[199]. The battery cells
[205] and influences
the choice of inherent components such as the image sensor. CMOS is
often the sensor of choice over the more light-sensitive CCD sensors due
to its lower power consumption
[206]. Probably the biggest limitation is
that WCE is a purely diagnostic tool, and cannot be used to perform procedures like biopsies
[196]. Some similar technologies in the form of
ingested capsules have begun to make approaches toward biomonitoring
and smart drug delivery
[58].
Recent Developments and Current Research
The limited power supply is still a bottleneck for capsule endoscopes
and their performance
[199]. Wireless power supply could offer a promis-
ing solution and might help to increase performance by allowing for the
integration of high power components which would increase resolution
[207]. There have been several approaches to energy savings in WCE, like

190 Biomedical Engineering in Gastrointestinal Surgery
processor steered shut-down times that would allow image acquisition to
be paused while the capsule passes an area of lower interest for the procedure in question. Different inventions have been introduced in recent years
that could potentially help to overcome problems with necessary power
transfer in capsule endoscopy. These approaches show an efficiency in voltage and power transmitted of 82.14% and 83.50%, respectively
[208].
Improving the quality factor of the coils employed might effectively
increase the system’s efficiency.
On the other hand, a tethered capsule endoscope employing OCT
has recently been introduced. The capsule is mainly suited for imaging
the esophagus, after which the capsule reaches the stomach driven by
nothing but peristalsis and can be pulled out using the elastic tether. The
images are superior to other high-resolution devices and tethered capsules
could provide a possible cheap alternative for dischargeable capsules with
enhanced image quality
[209].
These developments go hand in hand with the necessity of finding
approaches for capsule locomotion
[199]. The capsule previously traveled
passively using natural peristalsis. Therefore, the position of the device
and the imaging of the area of interest could not be controlled. Active
locomotion inside the gastrointestinal tract is very difficult to achieve
because the tissue is soft and viscoelastic.
How ever, a number of inno vations have been introduced that enable capsule steering and navigation. For instance, the Fraunhofer Institute for
Biomedical Engineering in Sulzbach/Germany has introduced a magnetic
steerable capsule in cooperation with their industrial partner, Giv en Imaging
Ltd., from Yokneam/Israel. The imaging capsule was partly filled with a magnetic material and can be remotely controlled from the outside with a complementary magnetic paddle. In initial tests, it was possible to control the imaging
time inside the esophagus from only a few seconds up to 10 minutes. Further,
almost 80% of the stomach walls were imaged, which has never been possible
using conventional capsules. Steering brings the additional advantage of imaging at multiple angles and obtaining close-ups of the areas of interest.
Engineers are working continuously to overcome a number of challenges associated with these devices
[189]. With further approaches in
active locomotion, the development of a microrobotic capsule capable of
conducting microsurgeries and biopsies could be possible, ultimately
replacing conventional capsule and tube endoscopes
[199].
The 50,000 images acquired during one examination create another
problem, making the analysis of the results a very time-consuming task
[201]
Соседние файлы в папке Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана
