Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3600_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
460
ab
P. Hever et al.
Fig. 46.9 (a, b) Step 7—The rib is then disarticulated from the ster- num, it can be removed as a single piece. If remnants of rib are still present medially; rongeurs can be used to remove rib medially until the
sternum is reached. Care must be taken not to over-resect and iatrogeni­cally remove sternum
ab
Fig. 46.10 (a, b) Step 8—The posterior perichondrium is dissected free using bipolar cautery from the underlying tissues. A damp swab can help to gently push and develop a plane between the overlying peri­chondrium and the vessels underneath. Care must be taken not to avulse or damage the underlying vessels particularly in cases where the chest is scarred due to radiotherapy– a nerve hook can help carefully dissect
the perivascular tissues in these cases. To make the space wider, inter­costal muscles are resected superiorly and inferiorly down to the second and fourth rib. The vessels are then dissected clean of perivascular fat and side branches – such as the anterior intercostal and sternal branches—cauterised or ligaclipped. Place ligaclips carefully, and angled appropriately, so they do not interfere with anastomosis
sected clean of perivascular fat and side branches—such as the anterior intercostal and sternal branches—cauter­ised or ligaclipped. Place ligaclips carefully and angled appropriately, so that they do not interfere with anastomosis.
Alternative Approach: The ‘Rib-Preserving’ Approach
(Fig.46.11) Another approach as is illustrated in this gure is to go between the ribs by raising an intercostal ap. The space for anastomosis can be narrow when using this approach, and is not favoured in cases of Bipedicled DIEP aps, or without experi­ence of the technique.
46 Chest Wall Recipient Vessels Access
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 46.11 Alternative approach: The rib preserving approach for internal mammary access—Another approach as is illustrated in this
gure is to go between the ribs by raising an intercostal ap. The space for anastomosis can be narrow when using this approach, and is not favoured in cases of Bipedicled DIEP aps, or without experience of the technique
46.6 Core Surgical Techniques inRecipient Vessel
We describe dissection of the internal mammary vessels in the second to third intercostal space following removal of the third rib, as this is the preferred point of access for the senior authors.
1. In an immediate reconstruction, the second and third
interspaces are marked before the mastectomy by pal­pating the ribs starting from the clavicle (Fig.46.3). In a delayed DIEP, the horizontal mastectomy scar is reopened down to the pectoralis major muscle, and the ribs palpated and marked.
2. Pec major is split using monopolar diathermy from its
insertion at the sternum along a length of approximately 4–5cm (Fig.46.4a). Incision length is limited to 5cm to permit suitable tension for retraction. Any sizeable per­forator vessels are preserved for the anastomosis (Fig.46.4b).
3. A self-retaining Traver’s retractor is inserted to expose
the second and third ribs, and sh hooks used to retract medial tissues. An alternative to sh hooks involves suturing 2.0 Vicryl sutures to the medial edge of the sternum and using these sutures as a retractor (Fig.46.5).
4. A 3cm line from the sternal edge is marked along the
anterior perichondrium of the lower rib to the begin-
461
ning of the bony rib, and incised with diathermy (Fig.46.6a, b). {NB: The IM vessels are located within 2–2.5cm of the sternal edge}.
5. A periosteal elevator is then used to strip the anterior perichondrium from the cartilage to its posterior surface (Fig.46.7a). A Mitchells trimmer can be used in cases where there is signicant irradiation of tissues, allowing for careful elevation of the anterior perichondrium (Fig.46.7b). A cardiac Doyenne aids posterior dissec­tion with gentle pushing medically once inserted into the correct plane between the posterior perichondrium below and the rib above.
6. The rib is then disarticulated from the sternum, with the aim to remove it as a single piece. If it is not removed as one piece, it can be removed piecemeal using rongeurs. Care must be taken here to avoid over resection, and iat­rogenic disruption of the sternum.
7. The posterior perichondrium is dissected free using bipolar cautery from the underlying tissues. A damp swab cotton bud can help gently push and develop a plane between the overlying perichondrium and the ves­sels underneath. Sometimes perforators can guide the location of the internal mammary vessels. Care must be taken not to avulse or damage the underlying vessels particularly in cases where the chest is scarred due to radiotherapy. A nerve hook can help carefully dissect the perivascular tissues in these cases. To make the space wider, intercostal muscles are resected superiorly and inferiorly down to the second and fourth rib.
8. The perivascular fat of the IM vessels helps with identi­cation once the posterior perichondrium has been dis­sected free (Fig.46.10a). The vessels can then be cleaned of perivascular fat either with loupes or under the micro­scope, and side branches cauterised with bipolar dia­thermy on a low setting, or ligaclipped in preparation for the ap (Fig.46.10b). Care must be taken to place liga­clips carefully and angled appropriately, so that they do not interfere with anastomosis. One can also preserve the intercostal nerve.
9. One should use the microscope early if there is signi­cant scarring, or difculty elevating posterior perichon­drium off the vessels.
10. The vessels are then marked in their superior longitudi­nal axis with a series of dots. This helps twisting the pedicle which can compromise the anastomoses. This is especially important if using a venous coupler, as this can help propagate a twist superiorly and may go unno­ticed beneath the superior rib.
462
46.7 Pearls andPitfalls 46.8 Selected Readings
P. Hever et al.
Pearls
• The IM vessels, especially the vein, are typically smaller in caliber on the left than the right side [6,
13].
• When incising the pec major, it is important to avoid lateral extension of the incision beyond 4–5cm to allow positioning of retractors with suit­able tension. The medial extent of muscle split needs to be continued to the sternal edge to achieve sufcient exposure.
• In patients with previous chest radiotherapy, it may be easier to use a standard rib-sacricing approach due to scarring and immobility of tissues. Often the segment of the IM vessels below the rib cartilage tend to be less friable than the segment within the interspace, suggesting a potential radio-protective effect of the rib.
• The fourth interspace usually has two venae comi­tantes, with the IMV most commonly branching at the level of the third or fourth rib (type I pattern). At this level, the vessels are of smaller diameter, are a better match for TUG aps, and can allow double ap anterograde anastomoses to both venae comitantes.
• An internal mammary lymph node can frequently be encountered during dissection of the IM vessels. Although it may demonstrate inammatory changes only, the identied node should be sent for histopa­thology in all patients with a cancer history, as this can alter stage and inuence future treatment.
Pitfalls
• During perichondrial elevation, care must be taken in the irradiated chest to avoid puncturing of the perichondrium due to increased scarring. This manoeuvre should therefore always be performed laterally, away from the IM vessels.
• Likewise, extra care must be taken in the dissection of the IM vessels, as the planes between the vessels and the perichondrium and pleura are not so easily separated following radiotherapy.
• When removing the cartilage, it is important to ensure that the cartilage is removed right to the ster­nal edge to ensure adequate exposure of the IM vein—a common mistake is to not remove enough cartilage medially.
• Arnez ZM, Valdatta L, Tyler MP, et al. Anatomy of the internal mammary veins and their use in free TRAM ap breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48(8):540–5.
A leading paper in the popularisation of the TRAM ap for
breast reconstruction, this paper provides the rst reported anatomical study of the IMV in human cadavers. Sixty­four internal mammary veins in 34 fresh human cadavers were studied, with 4 different patterns of venous anatomy identied. The type 1 pattern, in which the IMV runs medial and parallel to the IMA to the fourth intercostal space, where it divided into the medial and lateral IMV, was the most common pattern, observed in 69% of cases.
• Clark CP, Rohrich RJ, Copit S, etal. An anatomic study of the internal mammary veins: clinical implications for free-tissue-transfer breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(2):400–4.
Important anatomic study describing the anatomy of the
internal mammary veins. The authors reported that there were veins of at least 3mm diameter in the second ICS in 100% of cadavers. This was a landmark paper to support the use of the IM vessels as recipient vessels in free ap breast reconstruction.
• Parrett B, Caterson SA, Tobias A, Lee BT.The rib-sparing technique for internal mammary vessel exposure in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(3):241–3.
The rst paper to describe the rib-sparing approach for
IM vessel preparation. The authors reported a series of 74 aps in which the rib-sparing technique was performed over a 3-year period, with no signicant increase in com­plications, including revision of anastomosis (3%), fat necrosis (11%), or ap loss (1%), when compared with a group of 125 aps undergoing rib resection. They demon­strated this approach to allow adequate exposure for safe and efcient microanastomosis, and to be reliable, blood­less, and reproducible.
• Sasaki Y, Madada-Nyakauru RN, Samaras S.The ideal intercostal space for internal mammary vessel exposure during total rib-sparing microvascular breast reconstruc­tion: a critical evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:1000–6.
In this paper, the authors present a series of 296 rib-
preserving free ap breast reconstructions to support the safety and ease of the rib-preserving technique in micro­vascular breast reconstruction. They specically looked at the ideal ICS, providing evidence for the preferential use of the second ICS.They analysed the vessel exposure times of different grades of surgeon, demonstrating expo­sure time to decrease with experience (resident to fellow to attending), with time taken plateauing off after seven
46 Chest Wall Recipient Vessels Access
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
463
cases. They argued the efcacy and safety of the tech­nique, demonstrating a low intraoperative anastamotic revision rate and free ap failure rate.
• Hardwood N, Teotia S. Five steps to internal mammary vessel preparation in less than 15minutes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):884–6.
A useful paper describing ve simple steps to efcient and
safe internal mammary vessel preparation, with accom­panying technical videos. Breast reconstruction was per­formed in 415 patients (715 breasts) using autologous tissue (850 aps) from 2012 to 2016. In 97.6% of these breast reconstructions, the internal mammary vessels were used. The preparation of these vessels was routinely performed using the ve-step technique described, within an average of approximately 15min (range 7–45min).
Acknowledgements The authors give special thanks to Mr. Georgios Patanis of Barts Health NHS Trust and Dr. Yumao of Shanghai People’s Hospital, China, for contributing Fig.46.1a, b.
References
1. Longmire WP Jr, Ravitch MM.A new method for constructing an articial oesophagus. Ann Surg. 1946;123:819–34.
2. Fujino T, Harashina T, Aoyagi F.Reconstruction for aplasia of the breast and pectoral region by microvascular transfer of a free ap from the buttock. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;56:335.
3. Shaw WW.Breast reconstruction by superior gluteal microvascular free aps without silicone implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 1983;72(4):490–501.
4. Harashina T, Imai T, Nakajima H, et al. Breast reconstruction with microsurgical free composite tissue transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;33(1):30–7.
5. Arnez ZM, Valdatta L, Tyler MP, et al. Anatomy of the internal mammary veins and their use in free TRAM ap breast reconstruc­tion. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48(8):540–5.
6. Clark CP, Rohrich RJ, Copit S, et al. An anatomic study of the internal mammary veins: clinical implications for free­tissue-transfer breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(2):400–4.
7. Pradas-Irun C, Azzawi K, Malata CM.A plea for recipient vascu­lar pedicle versatility in microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):383e–5e.
8. Tuinder S, Dikmans R, Schipper R, etal. Anatomical evalu­ation of the internal mammary vessels based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:1363–7.
9. Sasaki Y, Madada-Nyakauru RN, Samaras S. The ideal intercos­tal space for internal mammary vessel exposure during total rib­sparing microvascular breast reconstruction: a critical evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:1000–6.
10. Rosich-Medina A, Bouloumpasis S, Di Candia M.Total ‘rib’-pre­serving technique of internal mammary vessel exposure for free ap breast reconstruction: a 5-year prospective cohort study and instructional video. Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:293–300.
11. Parrett B, Caterson SA, Tobias A, Lee BT. The rib-sparing tech­nique for internal mammary vessel exposure in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(3):241–3.
12. Jeevaratnam J, Nikkhah D, Dheansa B.The evolution of internal mammary vessel preparation in microsurgical breast reconstruc­tion: what is the current evidence? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(9):e226–7.
13. Dupin CL, Allen RJ, Glass CA, Bunch R. The internal mam­mary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-ap breast recon­struction: a report of 110 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(4):685–9.
Head and Neck Recipient Vessels Access
AlexandraO’Neill, JuanEnriqueBerner, andGeorgiosPatanis
47
47.1 Indications
Head and neck reconstruction poses unique challenges due to the highly specialised anatomy, and cosmetic importance of the region. Microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction has become the mainstay for large or composite defects and the guiding principles are to restore integrity, form, and function while aiming for an acceptable aesthetic outcome. Most recon­structions are performed following oncological surgery, which for intraoral and aerodigestive malignancies is frequently asso­ciated with concurrent neck dissection. However, secondary management of complications such as stulae or osteoradione­crosis is also common in specialist services. Recipient vessel selection is inuenced by defect site, indication for concurrent neck dissection, free ap pedicle length and caliber, and patient factors including prior surgery or radiotherapy.
47.2 Anatomy
47.2.1 Arterial Anatomy
At the level of the hyoid bone the common carotid artery (CCA) bifurcates into an internal and external carotid artery (ICA and ECA). The ICA slopes up in the carotid sheath beside the pharynx entering the base of skull via the carotid canal without giving off any branches throughout its course. The ECA continues anterior to the ICA passing deep to the posterior belly of digastric and stylohyoid before piercing the deep lamina of the parotid fascia and dividing into its terminal branches the maxillary artery and supercial temporal artery.
A. O’Neill (*) Department Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
J. E. Berner · G. Patanis London Reconstructive Microsurgery Unit (LRMU), Department of Plastic Surgery, Emergency Care and Trauma Division, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
The non-terminal branches of the ECA include three anterior branches (superior thyroid, lingual and facial), one medial branch (ascending pharyngeal), and two posterior branches (occipital and posterior auricular). The anterior branches of the ECA are commonly utilised recipient vessels for neck and lower facial reconstruction due to their favourable orientation. The arterial anatomy is fairly constant, except for the facial and lingual arteries that can occasionally arise from a common trunk, the fascio-lingual trunk. The supercial temporal artery courses behind the temporomandibular joint anterior to the mastoid and external ear and crosses the posterior aspect of the zygomatic arch where it can be palpated in the pre-auricular region. The supercial temporal vessels are easily accessible for upper face, temple, and scalp reconstructions.
The transverse cervical artery (TCA), a branch of the thy­rocervical trunk, is usually spared in most neck dissections and radiotherapy eld for intraoral and aerodigestive tract malignancies. It passes across the lower aspect of the poste­rior triangle just superior to the clavicle and anterior to sca­lenus anterior. It is usually the vessel of choice in hostile and vessel-depleted necks (Fig.47.1).
47.2.2 Venous Anatomy
The external jugular vein (EJV), formed by the posterior branch of the retromandibular vein and the posterior auricu­lar vein, courses down in the subcutaneous tissue over ster­nocleidomastoid, piercing the investing layer of the deep cervical fascia approximately 1cm above the midpoint of the clavicle to empty into the subclavian vein. The anterior branch of the retromandibular vein joins the facial vein emp­tying into the continuation of the sigmoid sinus to form the internal jugular vein (IJV) which typically receives the supe­rior thyroid vein and the vena commitantes of the hypoglos­sal nerve. The IJV lies posterior to the ICA within the loose lateral aspect of the carotid sheath receiving numerous tribu­taries along its course.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_47
465
466
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. O’Neill et al.
Superficial
temporal a.
Maxillary a.
Facial a.
Lingual a.
Superior
Thyroid a.
Transverse
cervical a.
Occipital a.
Posterior
auricular a.
Ascending
pharyngeal a.
Internal
carotid a.
Common carotid a.
Subclavian a.
Fig. 47.1 Commonly used vessels in head and neck reconstruction
47.3 Pre-operative Investigation
Head and neck cancer patients tend to be older, smokers, and with comorbidities and require thorough pre-operative work up, including nutritional arrangements for the peri-operative period. Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction following tumour excision typically undergo pre-operative staging scans to assess the primary tumour, the nodal basin and investigate for metastatic disease with a combination of computed topography (CT) of the head and neck, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomogra­phy (PET) for selected cases. Specic imaging to assess recipient vessels is not routinely performed in head and neck reconstruction; however, CT-angiography can be considered for high-risk patients that have undergone prior surgery or radiotherapy.
47.4 Recipient Vessel Access
A variety of skin incisions have been described for perform­ing neck dissections. The aim of these is to allow generous exposure to sub-platysma neck structures while raising robust skin aps. Incision selection may change depending on which lymphatic levels and adjacent structures need to be addressed (for example: Conley, Schobinger, Macfee, Ariyan skin incisions). If no oncological neck dissection is indi­cated, an access neck dissection can be performed to prepare recipient vessels. This incision is placed preferably on skin crease 3cm inferior to the border of the mandible. The inci­sion continues through subcutaneous tissues and the pla­tysma muscle. This approach allows identication and protection of the marginal mandibular nerve while exposing the investing layer of the deep cervical fascia (Fig.47.2).
47 Head and Neck Recipient Vessels Access
Fig. 47.2 Examples of described incisions for performing a neck dissection
467
Conley
Schobinger
47.5 Recipient Vessel Dissection: AStep- by- Step Guide
Recipient vessel selection is of paramount importance in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. The decision will be inuenced by the location of the reconstruction, the pedicle length of the chosen free ap, and the availability of vessels in the region. For defects in the upper third ofthe face and scalp, the supercial temporal vessels tend to be ideally positioned, how­ever, for defects of the lower two-thirds the facial artery offers easier access. For aerodigestive tract or neck resurfacing, the superior thyroid vessels are usually preferred. The transverse cer­vical vessels offer a lifeboat alternative in vessel- depleted necks, as it is spared in selective anterolateral neck dissections and radiotherapy elds. This algorithm should only be a guide, the ideal vessels for a given location may not be available, necessitat­ing exploration of nearby alternatives. In this scenario having a long ap pedicle is preferred, with vein grafts being a last resort.
47.5.1 Facial Artery (FA)
Step 1: The facial artery is palpated against the mandible
and marked (Fig.47.3).
Step 2: Skin and subcutaneous tissues are incised; pla-
tysma is then divided. Flaps are raised on the sub- platysma
Macfee
Ariyan
Fig. 47.3 Incision for accessing facial vessels
plane, allowing identication of the marginal mandibular nerve (Fig.47.4).
Step 3: Protecting the nerve, the deep investing fascial layer of the neck can be incised and reected superiorly. This exposes the facial artery (Fig.47.5), which can be dissected proximally and distally.
Step 4: Removal of the submandibular gland and transpos- ing the facial artery stump below the posterior body of digas­tric allows mobilisation of this recipient vessel (Fig.47.6).
468
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 47.4 Subplatysmal dissection
A. O’Neill et al.
47.5.2 Superior Thyroid Artery (STA)
Step 1: The superior thyroid artery is usually accessed in the context of an anterolateral neck dissection.
Step 2: The artery is identied as it arises from the exter- nal carotid artery and travels caudally to the thyroid gland within the carotid sheath.
Step 3: The vessels are prepared carefully as they have a smaller calibre than the facial artery, providing a good match for SCIP or lateral arm aps (Fig.47.7).
Step 4: The artery can be mobilised cranially to facilitate anastomosis.
47.5.3 Supercial Temporal Artery (SuTA)
Step 1: A pre-auricular incision can be continued superi- orly, or a hemi-coronal incision can be utilised to access the supercial temporal fascia in the temple region.
Fig. 47.5 Facial vessels are identied, while protecting marginal man­dibular branch of facial nerve
Fig. 47.6 Facial artery can be traced superiorly to augment the length of recipient vessels
Fig. 47.7 Superior thyroid vessels are ideally positioned for microsur­gical pharyngeal reconstruction
47 Head and Neck Recipient Vessels Access
Step 2: The supercial temporal vessels are identied under the supercial temporal fascia. Approximately 2–4cm superior to the zygomatic arch the SuTA divides into its terminal branches.
Step 3: The supercial temporal vessels are dissected and prepared. If small, they can be dissected inferiorly into the parotid gland, where their calibre increases.
47.5.4 Transverse Cervical Artery (TCA)
Step 1: The transverse cervical vessels are located at the base of the posterior triangle of the neck, and are usually accessed in the context of a neck dissection.
Step 2: The vessels can be identied as they pass laterally from their origin, the thyrocervical artery, across the pos­terior triangle on scalenus anterior, just above the clavicle.
Step 3: The vessels are ligated just prior to their division into supercial and deep branches, facilitating superior transposition of the vessel to make it reach the level of the hyoid. Vessel length ranges from 4 to 7cm and has mean diameter of 2.65mm [1] (Fig.47.8).
469
Fig. 47.9 The EJV can be mobilised to achieve an end-to-end anasto­mosis, using a coupler device for this case
47.5.5 Venous Recipients
The EJV can be marked pre-operatively in slim patients; how­ever, this is rarely required. Commonly, the EJV is divided during the neck dissection, where it is ligated as high as fea­sible and dissected a few centimetres proximally in its subcu­taneous course to facilitate unrestricted mobility. Good communication between the reconstructive team and resecting teams is imperative to optimise EJV preservation during the nodal dissection. The EJV provides a reliable, easily accessi­ble choice for end-to-end venous anastomosis (Fig.47.9).
The IJV is exposed through its entire cervical course dur-
ing a neck dissection and its many tributaries ligated, thereby providing multiple viable recipient vessels (Fig. 47.10).
Fig. 47.10 End-to-side anastomosis to IJV
Anastomoses can be performed end to end onto one of its tributaries or end to side on to the IJV itself. If a side branch is to be used, standard microvascular clamps can be applied to the vessel base. For end-to-side anastomoses a paediatric Satinsky clamp can be applied to the IJV to facilitate anasto­mosis, this should be applied after the venotomy site is marked, as the vessel collapse can obscure the ideal site and size required.
47.6 Core Surgical Techniques inRecipient Vessel Harvesting
Fig. 47.8 Transverse cervical vessels can be found in the posterior tri-
angle of the neck during a comprehensive or radical neck dissection
Recipient vessel selection and preparation is largely deter­mined by whether a neck dissection is indicated at the time of reconstruction and the type of dissection planned includ­ing what structures are anticipated to be sacriced [2].
470
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. O’Neill et al.
Subplatysmal aps are raised via the surgeon’s preferred neck dissection incision and the EJV is dissected and ligated as a potential recipient vein. The sternocleidomastoid muscle is retracted laterally with a conventional or self-retaining retractor or, alternatively, a nylon tape, to expose the under­lying carotid sheath and its contents. The IJV is dissected cranial with preservation of tributary stumps, provided its sacrice is not planned with the oncologic resection. The external carotid artery is dissected, and particular attention paid to the anterior branches, notably the facial and superior thyroid arteries which are conveniently positioned to facili­tate microvascular anastomosis. Recipient vessels should be mobilised 1–2cm where possible to provide adequate length and reduce the risk of kinking. Patency and pulsatile ow are conrmed, and a microvascular clamp is applied in anticipa­tion for ap transfer (Table47.1).
Table 47.1 Proposed algorithm for recipient vein selection in head and neck reconstruction
Algorithm for recipient vein selection in
Head and Neck free tissue transfer
1º:
Venous comitant vein of
the selected recipient artery
2º:
Branches of the Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) in
proximity to the selected recipient artery
3º:
External Jugular Vein (EJV)
4º:
Internal Jugular Vein (IJV) in an
end-to-side configuration
5º:
Long Vein grafting to the contralateral neck
veins (IJV branches or contralateral EJV)
6º:
Cephalic vein transposition
47.6.1 Microvascular Anastomosis
Once the flap is transferred to the recipient site, the ped­icle is checked to ensure no twist has occurred during transfer (Fig.47.10). The decision in terms of sequence for venous and arterial anastomoses should consider the position of the recipient vessels and the difficulty of access. Reconstruction of head and neck defects often requires partial flap inset prior to microvascular anasto­moses, and this should be factored into the surgical plan­ning. An algorithm for recipient arteries is displayed in Table47.2.
47.7 Pearls andPitfalls
Pearls
• The decision to perform end-to-end or end-to­side arterial and venous anastomoses is best decided on a case by case basis with consider­ation of the conguration of recipient and pedicle vessels, vessel calibre, and potential size mis­match rather than a dogmatic approach that has been traditionally taught [35].
• Consider the transverse cervical vessels or the con­tralateral neck in irradiated elds and patients with prior neck dissections. The TCA is less affected by atherosclerosis than the carotid system [1, 6, 7].
• Two venous anastomoses are better than one where possible [8]. Studies have demonstrated IJV throm­bosis rated between 0 and 26% at 1week post free ap reconstruction [9, 10].
Pitfalls
• Where two free aps are required to reconstruct large or composite defects and recipient vessels are limited, the rst ap can be used as a recipient ves­sel to the second ap. In this situation, the second ap can be vascularised by either a proximal mus­cle branch off the ap pedicle (a pseudo-chimeric ap) or by distal run off from the rst ap (ow­through style ap [11]). This technique does carry a high rate of partial and total ap failure but can pro­vide a bailout in the vessel- deplete neck.
• The contralateral neck, internal mammary vessels and the cephalic vein are alternatives for vessel­depleted necks for which the transverse cervical vessels are not available. The pectoralis major is still a robust regional ap option when no recipient vessels are available for soft tissue transfer.