Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3600_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
356
Fig. 37.4 The gracilis should now be palpated. The forceps in the left image point to the gracilis enclosed in fascia. In the right image the fascia between adductor longus and gracilis is marked for incision
R. Miller et al.
Fig. 37.5 Dissection to expose the gracilis muscle (blue arrow) with the GSV retracted superiorly (black arrow)
Fig. 37.6 Retraction of the AL superiorly (white arrow) aids identi­cation of the neurovascular pedicle (blue arrow) entering the gracilis (black arrow)
37 Medial Circumex Femoral Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 37.7 The pedicle (blue arrow) is dissected proximally between the AL and adductor magnus (white arrows). The gracilis is indicated by the black arrow
357
Fig. 37.8 Black arrow = gracilis. Blue arrow = pedicle. White arrow=motor nerve
Fig. 37.9 A swab is placed around the proximal gracilis and monopolar cautery used to divide it
Step 11. Free the ap distally. During this you may encounter further pedicles, which can either be preserved or ligated.
Step 12. Place the gracilis at resting tension and mark the muscle at set intervals (every 1cm, for example. See clin­ical case 1). This step is necessary for reanimation proce­dures to facilitate tensioning at inset. It may be omitted when muscle tensioning is not necessary (for example, in lower limb trauma).
Step 13. Divide the ap distally. Options:
(a) Split the muscle distally at the required length. Place
a swab around the muscle and slow division with
(b) Split the gracilis tendon approximately 5cm distal to
the musculotendinous junction.
(c) Make a separate distal incision over the insertion,
trace the tendon down to the tibia (between the sarto­rius and semitendinosus) and harvest at its insertion (Fig.37.10).
Step 14. Divide the ap proximally, either through the muscle or through the proximal tendinous origin, depend­ing on the length required.
(a) Remember for the musculocutaneous ap you will
also need to incise the posterior border of the skin
paddle. monopolar cautery can be used to reduce bleeding (Fig.37.9).
358
Fig. 37.10 This demonstrates a distal incision at the tendinous inser­tion which will be divided for harvest
37.6 Core Surgical Techniques inFlap Dissection
There are several modications and techniques to the gracilis ap raise. This is predominantly regarding the ap dimen­sions and components raised as outlined in step 13 above.
For muscle-only aps (step 13a), the muscle and proximal tendinous portion can be trimmed to the appropriate size and shape. Unless inclusion of one or both musculotendinous junctions is essential, trimming of the muscle to length is dependent on adequate positioning of the pedicle.
If the distal gracilis tendon is needed (step 13 b and c), the ap may be raised with or without a skin paddle. Most com­monly this is used in limb reconstruction and may only require a small skin paddle for ap monitoring, if so desired. However, these should be used with caution as the skin paddles can be unreliable, appearing unhealthy when the underlying muscle is healthy. If a long length of tendon is required it should be remembered that there are two slips of the distal tendon (see Fig. 37.11 lower image). The rst, inserting to the medial tibial condyle, can be divided. The main terminal slip can be raised with tibial periosteum to achieve approximately 1cm more length [6]. Whether using
R. Miller et al.
muscle alone or a musculocutaneous ap for functional free ap reconstruction, the muscle should be marked prior to division. This can be under functional or resting tension. Whichever is used, the same should be used at inset (Figs.37.12 and37.13b).
For musculocutaneous aps, the surgeon should ensure the paddle is appropriately designed over the gracilis muscle and it may be necessary to redesign the skin paddle once the gracilis muscle is identied. If a large skin paddle is needed, from step 6 above you should aim to include septa between the gracilis – adductor magnus and gracilis – sartorius to increase the septocutaneous supply and improve skin paddle survival. If independent movement between muscle and skin is desired this can be achieved by separating the skin ap and muscle. This can be done with ligation/ cautery of musculo­cutaneous perforators until the proximal AL-Gracilis septum is reached, at which point septal perforators to the skin can be identied and preserved. The skin paddle can then be rotated and placed at inset [6].
Similarly, the gracilis ap can be raised with an indepen­dent skin ap from a medial circumex perforator artery as a conjoint ap [6, 16]. This requires identication of musculo­cutaneous perforators pre-op using a hand-held Doppler and the skin paddle should be designed centred longitudinally on the selected perforator and elevated as a perforator ap with intra-muscular dissection of the perforators to the main ves­sel. Elevation of the gracilis muscle ap is then carried out as described above. Similarly, a transversely orientated skin paddle [15] can be designed for a musculocutaneous ap in breast reconstruction. In this case it is not necessary to iso­late the transverse skin paddle as a perforator ap. The ap raise should follow the steps for musculocutaneous ap raise above with an adapted skin paddle design.
When using the gracilis muscle or musculocutaneous ap as a pedicled ap in reconstruction of the lower abdomen, groin, vagina or perineum the steps outlined above for ap raise can be followed without division of the pedicle. Patient positioning depends on access to the recipient site, with supine, lithotomy and even prone positioning described as necessary [17].
37 Medial Circumex Femoral Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 37.11 Different ap harvest designs. The top image demonstrating muscle alone for a lower limb reconstruction and the lower image dem­onstrating the full muscle length with distal tendon (blue arrow) for free functional muscle transfer. Black arrow=pedicle
359
dynamic facial movement. The ap was harvested with the vascular pedicle and motor nerve clearly demonstrated in Fig.37.13a. The gracilis muscle was marked (Fig.37.13b) to ensure correct tensioning on transfer and inset as discussed above. Figure37.13c demonstrates the ap inset and tension- ing. The vascular pedicle and motor branch can be clearly seen at inset. The ap was thinned to approximately 10g in situ. The facelift type access was closed and the buried ap was monitored by hourly Doppler signals for the rst 24h followed by 2 hourly to 36h. A Penrose drain secured in the post-auricular region was removed at 24h as was a suction drain to the thigh. Post-op recovery was uneventful and facial therapy commenced at 2weeks. Dynamic facial movement was reestablished at week 7.
Fig. 37.12 The muscle can be placed under functional tension and marked at 1cm intervals prior to division
37.7 Clinical Scenario
37.7.1 Case 1: Facial Reanimation: Surgeon Graeme Glass
This case demonstrates an innervated free gracilis ap for left-sided facial reanimation in a child. Pre-operative exami­nation revealed signicant facial asymmetry at rest and on
37.7.2 Case 2: Upper Limb Reanimation: Surgeons Dariush Nikkhah and Jeremy Rawlins
The gentleman in this case suffered a pan plexus injury to his brachial plexus after a high-speed motorbike road trafc accident. Previous nerve transfers had been unsuccessful. In this case a free functional gracilis muscle transfer was per­formed to reanimate elbow exion. The gracilis ap was har­vested with gracilis tendon using a two-team approach. The arterial ap pedicle was anastomosed onto the thoracoacro­mial artery and the ap obturator nerve was anastomosed to the spinal accessory nerve. The proximal end of the gracilis was anchored onto the clavicle and the distal end inserted with a Krakow repair onto the biceps tendon. A small win­dow was kept to monitor the muscle and a Doppler signal was recorded (Fig. 37.14). The patient had an uneventful post-operative recovery and achieved an MRC 4 as demon­strated in the video (Video 37.1).
360
R. Miller et al.
a
b
c
Fig. 37.13 (a) This demonstrated the gracilis muscle ap prior to divi- sion of the pedicle and muscle. The motor nerve is seen on the left (black arrow) and the pedicle superiorly (white arrow). (b) This dem­onstrated the marking of the muscle to facilitate tensioning on inset.
(c) This demonstrates the ap after inset and after thinning with the motor nerve (black arrow) and vascular pedicle(white arrow) again highlighted
37 Medial Circumex Femoral Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
361
Fig. 37.14 These images demonstrate the patient journey from pre-op, intra-op ap raise and inset and post-operative outcome. Note the window left post-operatively to allow ap monitoring. The post-operative images demonstrating 4/5 elbow exion power at 6months
362
37.8 Pearls andPitfalls
Pearls
• Suturing the skin paddle to the muscle fascia is advised during the harvest of musculocutaneous aps to prevent shearing of the musculocutaneous perforators.
• When using a skin paddle, starting ap elevation with the anterior incision allows the adductor lon­gus to be easily identied by its prominent proximal tendon (which is also easily palpated). This gracilis is readily identied posteriorly to this in the upper thigh and allows the step of a distal incision to iden­tify the gracilis tendon and check skin paddle place­ment to be omitted.
• When using a free gracilis muscle ap, a small win­dow can be left to allow ap monitoring instead of using a skin paddle which may not correlate to the underlying muscle (Fig.37.14).
• Alternatively, a buried free gracilis ap may be monitored using Doppler ultrasound only. In the absence of peer-reviewed evidence a reasonable protocol is hourly monitoring for the rst 24h and 2 hourly overnight for the next 12h. At this point, the senior author discontinues protocolled monitoring.
• If using the gracilis as a functional muscle, the rest­ing tension of the inset must equal the resting ten­sion of the muscle in situ. To help get this right, measure and mark (with absorbable sutures) 1cm intervals along the muscle in situ. Measure again during ap inset to ensure the tension is right.
• When using a free gracilis ap for facial reanima­tion, it is advisable to use the gracilis muscle from the same side as the side of the face to be reani­mated, as, during inset, the orientation of the nerve and vessels better corresponds to the position of the facial vessels and the likely nerve donors. (If per­forming the procedure in two teams, the ap harvest surgeon may sit on the opposite side while the facial preparation is done on the ipsilateral side).
• Measure the distance between the junction of the tragus and zygomatic arch and the oral commissure and add 2–3cm for the muscle split. This provides the length of the muscle ap harvest. Next measure the distance between the palpable facial artery as it curves around the body of the mandible and the oral commissure. This provides an estimate for the length of the pedicle needed.
• Inset the distal ap prior to the arterial and venous anastomosis. Then do the nerve coaptation followed be the proximal ap insertion. This provides ap stability while maintaining exibility of inset and minimizes ischaemic time.
R. Miller et al.
Pitfalls
• Do not confuse the adductors for the gracilis. This may happen if the incision is not marked approxi­mately 2 cm posterior to the main portion of the muscle body. When the patient is supine with the knee exed (as positioned on the operating table) the gracilis is not under tension and will fall poste­riorly. If the incision markings have not been placed as described, the gracilis may be posterior to the incision, causing confusion.
• Insufcient pedicle length. Dissect the pedicle right to its insertion from profunda femoris. This can be facilitated by a window above the adductor longus to help take as much pedicle as needed [18].
• Muscle aps are more sensitive to ischaemia and therefore one should limit the ischaemic time of the muscle. Ensure the microsurgical setup is well pre­pared to facilitate this. Aim for an ischaemic time of less than 2h.
• Pedicle mismatch. Be prepared to do end to side anastomosis or perforator to perforator in lower limb.
• It can be more challenging to elevate muscle aps versus fasciocutaneous aps down the line if the ap needs to be elevated to facilitate removal of metal work in the lower limb, for example. Muscle aps can die if the pedicle is divided down the line and therefore careful case selection is advised when used in lower limb trauma.
37.9 A Note onMonitoring Muscle Flaps forVascular Compromise
Studies indicate that irreversible ischaemic changes occur within 2h of compromised skeletal muscle [19]. We must therefore assume that we have a window of no more than 2h from the onset of ap compromise to the re-establishment of tissue perfusion. In practical terms, the likelihood of success­ful surgical salvage of a congested muscle ap is therefore low. Logically, the decision about whether to commence a protocol of post-operative ap monitoring must therefore consider whether the resources and logistical infrastructure at the surgeons’ disposal can facilitate a rapid return to the operating room if necessary. This must be balanced against the fact that ap monitoring is demanding on clinical time and exhausting for the patient. Thus, given that most ap problems occur within the rst 36h, a rigorous protocol of ap monitoring during this critical period seems reasonable. By contrast, there is little logical merit in prolonged, tapered protocols. Ultimately, the time to make these decisions is not in the lull of mental exhaustion that follows a successful free ap surgery. Protocols should be agreed in advance based on
37 Medial Circumex Femoral Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
363
the resources available and deviations from agreed protocols must have a basis in logic.
37.10 Selected Readings
• Giordano PA, Abbes M, Pequignot JP.Gracilis blood sup­ply: anatomical and clinical re-evaluation. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43 (3):266–272.
This classic paper provides the groundwork for ana­tomical investigations and studies of the gracilis ap vasculature, following on from the work by Mathes and Nahai [9].
• Hattori Y1, Doi K, Abe Y, Ikeda K, Dhawan V.Surgical approach to the vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle ap. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 May;27 (3):534–6.
This paper describes an easy and safe approach to the vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle ap. With this technique the vascular pedicle can be harvested with maximum length and the largest possible calibre for func­tioning free muscle transfer [20].
• Tremp M, Oranges CM, Wang WJ, Wettstein R, Zhang YX, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF.The “nugget design”: A modied segmental gracilis free ap for small-sized defect reconstruction on the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017.
The paper introduces a technical renement for small­sized three-dimensional defect reconstruction on the foot using a segmental free gracilis muscle ap supplied but secondary proximal pedicles. Although in the majority of cases the gracilis is based on it is dominant pedicle, it should be remembered that this is a versatile ap that can be adapted to a wide range of reconstructions [21].
• Franco MJ, Nicolson MC, Parikh RP, Tung TH.Lower Extremity Reconstruction with Free Gracilis Flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Mar;33 (3):218–224.
This paper discusses the use of the gracilis ap in lower limb reconstruction. It supports its use for small­and medium-sized defects and highlights the benet of a denervated muscle ap for this reconstruction with good long-term outcomes [7].
• Coelho JAJ, McDermott FD, Cameron O, Smart NJ, Watts AM, Daniels IR.Single centre experience of bilat­eral gracilis ap perineal reconstruction following extra­levator abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21 (8):910–91.
This recent paper reports the authors use of the graci­lis ap for perineal reconstruction. They have found suc­cess in positioning the patient prone, as discussed above, and is worth reviewing if this is to be attempted [17].
• Doi K, Sakai K, Kuwata N, Ihara K, Kawai S. Double free-muscle transfer to restore prehension following com-
plete brachial plexus avulsion. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 1995 May 1;20 (3):408–14.
A fantastic paper from Doi etal. on the use of double functional free muscle transfers in brachial plexus injury. Although in this series the gracilis is not used in isolation, it is the favoured ap and highlights its importance in the function of reconstructing the upper limb [22].
References
1. Pickrell KL, Broadbent TR, Masters FW, Metzger JT.Construction of a rectal sphincter and restoration of anal continence by trans­planting the gracilis muscle; a report of four cases in children. Ann Surg. 1952;135(6):853–62.
2. Orticochea M. The musculo-cutaneous ap method: an immedi­ate and heroic substitute for the method of delay. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25(2):106–10.
3. McCraw JB, Massey FM, Shanklin KD, Horton CE.Vaginal recon­struction with gracilis myocutaneous aps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(2):176–83.
4. Harii K, Ohmori K, Sekiguchi J.The free musculocutaneous ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57(3):294–303.
5. Mathes SJ, Nahai F.Classication of the vascular anatomy of mus­cles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(2):177–87.
6. Wei F-C, Mardini S. Flaps and reconstructive surgery. Elsevier;
2009.
7. Franco MJ, Nicoson MC, Parikh RP, Tung TH. Lower extrem­ity reconstruction with free Gracilis aps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(3):218–24.
8. Peek A, Müller M, Ackermann G, Exner K, Baumeister S. The free gracilis perforator ap: anatomical study and clinical rene­ments of a new perforator ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(2): 578–88.
9. Giordano PA, Abbes M, Pequignot JP. Gracilis blood sup­ply: anatomical and clinical re-evaluation. Br J Plast Surg. 1990;43(3):266–72.
10. Lykoudis EG, Spyropoulou GA, Vlastou CC. The anatomic basis of the gracilis perforator ap. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(8): 1090–4.
11. Kappler UA, Constantinescu MA, Büchler U, Vögelin E.Anatomy of the proximal cutaneous perforator vessels of the gracilis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(4):445–8.
12. Magden O, Tayfur V, Edizer M, Atabey A. Anatomy of gracilis muscle ap. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(6):1948–50.
13. Whitaker IS, Karavias M, Shayan R, etal. The gracilis myocutane­ous free ap: a quantitative analysis of the fasciocutaneous blood supply and implications for autologous breast reconstruction. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36367.
14. Krishnan K. An illustrated handbook of ap-raising techniques. NewYork: Thieme; 2008. p.24–8.
15. Yousif NJ, Matloub HS, Kolachalam R, Grunert BK, Sanger JR.The transverse gracilis musculocutaneous ap. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29(6):482–90.
16. Hallock GG. The medial circumex femoral (gracilis) local per­forator ap--a local medial groin perforator ap. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51(5):460–4.
17. Coelho JAJ, McDermott FD, Cameron O, Smart NJ, Watts AM, Daniels IR.Single Centre experience of bilateral gracilis ap peri­neal reconstruction following extra-levator abdominoperineal exci­sion. Color Dis. 2019;21(8):910–6.
364
R. Miller et al.
18. King IC, Obeid N, Woollard AC, Jones ME.Maximizing length and safety in gracilis free ap dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(10):1452–3.
19. Labbe R, Lindsay T, Walker PM.The extent and distribution of skeletal muscle necrosis after graded periods of complete ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 1987;6(2):152–7.
20. Hattori Y, Doi K, Abe Y, Ikeda K, Dhawan V.Surgical approach to the vascular pedicle of the gracilis muscle ap. J Hand Surg Am. 2002;27(3):534–6.
21. Tremp M, Oranges CM, Wang WJ, et al. The "nugget design": a modied segmental gracilis free ap for small-sized defect recon­struction on the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(9):1261–6.
22. Doi K, Sakai K, Kuwata N, Ihara K, Kawai S.Double free-muscle transfer to restore prehension following complete brachial plexus avulsion. J Hand Surg Am. 1995;20(3):408–14.
Profunda Artery Perforator Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
TomoyukiYano
38
38.1 Introduction
The profunda artery perforator (PAP) ap was rst intro­duced as a free ap for soft tissue defects by Angrigiani etal. (2001). Allen etal. (2012) applied this technique in the eld of breast reconstruction in 2012. Since then, various studies on PAP ap breast reconstruction have been conducted, and the PAP ap has become one of the alternative ap options for autologous breast reconstruction. Nowadays, the PAP ap is a thin and pliable ap option for head and neck recon­struction and soft tissue defect in the extremity as well.
An advantage of the PAP ap is it has less anatomical variation and it has a straightforward pedicle dissection. A skin paddle can harvest adequate adipose tissue volume without any damage to surrounding muscles, which leads to less donor site morbidity after surgery. Moreover, the donor site wound will be nicely hidden in the posterior medial side of the thigh or inguinal crease. A disadvantage of the PAP ap is that only a limited width of the skin paddle can be harvested to achieve primary safe donor site closure. A small- to moderate-sized defect, which needs a certain amount of adipose tissue, will be a good indication for the PAP ap.
38.2 Anatomy
Finally, this perforator gives off two or three cutaneous branches to the posterior medial thigh region. The location of perforators are consistent, and there is little anatomical vari­ation. Actually, in our experience with 38 cases of the PAP ap, there was no case that did not have any single perforator in the posterior medial region. You can always nd at least one adequate perforator of the PAP ap in the posterior medial region, and this might be a distinct difference between the PAP ap and ALT ap. On the other hand, the second and third perforators of the profunda femoris artery supply the semi-membranosus, biceps femoris and vastus lateralis muscles.
**
*
***
The profunda femoris artery gives off three perforators in the posterior compartment of the thigh. The rst perforator of the profunda femoris artery supplies the adductor magnus and gracilis muscles. This perforator penetrates these mus­cles, takes an intra-muscular course, or a septal course, and branches to the posterior medial thigh skin (Fig. 38.1). Usually, the rst perforator is approximately 8–10cm from the groin crease and 2–3 cm below the gracilis muscle.
T. Yano (*) Cancer Institute hospital for JFCR, Tokyo, Japan
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_38
Fig. 38.1 A schema of the anatomy of the PAP ap. The red and blue boxes indicate the profunda artery and vein, the femoral artery and vein. The red circle shows the great saphenous vein. The single, double and triple asterisks indicate the gracilis muscle, adductor longus muscle and adductor magnus muscle, respectively. The red line with accompanying double blue line represents the perforator of the PAP ap
365