Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3600_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
39 Medial Femoral Condyle Flap
ab
377
c
Fig. 39.7 Illustrations of a medial femoral condyle structural bone graft (a) and medial femoral trochlear graft (b) used for scaphoid recon­struction after insetting and microvascular anastomosis is shown. Conversely, corticoperisoteal grafts are typically wrapped around the
recipient site, such as a clavicular nonunion undergoing revision open reduction and internal xation (c). (Reproduced with permission of the Mayo Foundation)
378
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. L. Logli and A. Y. Shin
39.6 Core Surgical Techniques inFlap Dissection
Under tourniquet control, a medial thigh incision starting at the most palpable, distal edge of the femur and extending proximally along the posterior border of the vastus medialis is used (Step 1—Incision). A curved incision is used instead when a component of articular cartilage is desired for the graft. The incision should be extended as necessary, which may be the case with more muscular patients. This should be anterior to the SAB signal if a skin island is planned. In all cases, the SAB is protected if identied during exposure. Electrocautery and self-retaining retractors are used to dis­sect through subcutaneous tissue down to fascia and then to make a small distal rent at the posterior border of the vastus medialis fascia. Metzenbaum scissors are used to complete the fascial divide proximally along the entire length of the incision, and the vastus medialis is lifted from its compart­ment anteriorly. The MFC and overlying vascularity can then be fully appreciated in the bed of the wound (Step 2— Exposure). Posterior retraction of the sartorius muscle may be needed for improved visualization. The DGA may be visualized on the oor of the wound just anterior to the adductor magnus tendon proximally and overlying the MFC distally. If the DGA is large enough, the sMGA branch may be ligated and divided. However, if the DGA is not large enough, the sMGA should be used and DGA contribution ligated instead. A green background is placed beneath the chosen pedicle for ease of recognition. Once the supply ves­sel has been chosen (DGA or sMGA), the planned graft can be outlined on the MFC periosteum using bipolar electro­cautery (Step 3—Graft Planning). Planning a slightly larger ap than measured is important to allow for later customization.
Next, graft separation is dependent on graft composition. For a structural graft, a small curved osteotome or microsag­ittal saw (9 mm wide blade) is used perpendicular to the bone surface to vertically divide all but the proximal border of the graft where the pedicle is travelling (Step 4—Graft Separation). Identifying and avoiding the medial epicondyle of the femur will prevent disturbing the MCL during this step. Proximally, removal of the graft is done in three stages. First, a vessel loupe should be used to gently lift the vascu­lar pedicle out of harm’s way. Second, the small osteotome is similarly used perpendicular to the bony surface to make a vertical, proximal divide. Finally, the small osteotome is used 1–2 cm proximally to the proximal border of the planned graft at a 45° angle to undercut the graft (Step 5— Graft Elevation). This prevents levering out an incomplete
or fragmented graft. The oor of the graft can then be lifted out of the donor site without damage or tension to the vas­cular pedicle. Viability of the graft can be ascertained by assessing for punctate bleeding from the periosteum. The tourniquet may be deated if necessary, to visualize this. Graft separation and elevation is performed similarly for articular grafts, with exceptions being that the knee capsule needs to be entered rst and that the last cut is made through the cartilage to ensure an adequate amount is incorporated (Step 5—Graft Separation and Step 6—Graft Elevation). The process of graft separation differs in corticoperiosteal grafts, where a curved osteotome is instead used running almost parallel to the cortical surface and where gradual separation occurs from the margins toward the center (Step 5—Graft Separation). Elevation is completed from distal to proximal by prying the graft away from the underlying can­cellous bone beneath the vascular pedicle (Step 6—Graft Elevation).
The size and dimensions of the graft are then carefully scrutinized. Additional cancellous bone can be harvested from the donor site at this time. The pedicle is followed proximally and dissected free to maximize pedicle length before being clipped and sharply divided. The pedicle is usually at least 6cm in length and close to the origin of the donor vessel. One clip is placed on the artery and two clips on any venae comitantes to facilitate ease of identication during anastomosis (Step 6—Graft Preparation and Division). Trimming and customization of the graft should be performed after division of the pedicle. The donor site wound is then copiously irrigated with sterile saline. The bony defect is grafted with synthetic hydroxyapatite bone ller of the surgeon’s choice. The donor site is closed in layers using absorbable sutures (Step 7—Donor Site Closure). Deep fascia and patellar retinacular tissues using interrupted 0-Vicryl sutures in a gure-of-eight fashion. Buried, interrupted 2–0 Monocryl is used to close subcuta­neous tissue over a 10-French supra-fascial channel drain set to bulb suction. A running 3–0 barbed suture followed by an occlusive mesh and 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive dressing are used for skin. The knee is dressed in a soft and bulky compressive dressing and a knee immobilizer is applied. The drain is typically discontinued on postopera­tive day 1 for non-articular grafts and postoperative day 2 or 3 for articular grafts.
Structural grafts should be inset into the donor bed as an interposition graft, while corticoperiosteal grafts are wrapped around the recipient bone. In most instances, fur­ther stabilization is then necessary and is dependent on the anatomic region of the donor site. Once satised with graft
39 Medial Femoral Condyle Flap
379
security, end-to-side arterial anastomosis followed by an end-to-end microvenous repair is performed using an opera­tive microscope and 8–0 or 9–0 nylon suture in an inter­rupted fashion (Step 8—Graft Inset and Anastomosis). Patency of the vessels and perfusion of the graft are visually conrmed prior to closure. Recipient site closure is per­formed in a layered fashion and is dependent on the ana­tomic site.
Postoperatively, the knee immobilizer is to be worn over the rst few days for patient comfort as knee exion may be uncomfortable. Immediate weight-bearing and range of motion is permitted and is usually tolerated well. A cane is supplied and may be used in the contralateral hand for sup­port in the rst few days after surgery.
39.7 Clinical Scenario
A healthy, 19-year-old, right-hand-dominant college fresh­man injured his left wrist during a fall while playing soccer. It initially was treated as a sprain. Due to ongoing pain, med­ical evaluation was sought 1year after injury, and he was
diagnosed with a scaphoid nonunion. Physical examination revealed pain in the anatomic snuffbox and diminished active wrist range of motion in all planes. Imaging demonstrated a nonunion of the scaphoid waist with a large cystic area and sclerosis of the proximal pole concerning for potential avas­cular necrosis (Fig. 39.8). A MFC vascularized bone graft from the ipsilateral leg was recommended and performed. The graft measured 10×10×10mm and was taken from the posterior-distal aspect of the MFC off the DGA.Once inset, the graft was pre-drilled and xed with a 24mm cannulated, scaphoid-specic screw under uoroscopic guidance. Standard reanastomosis and closure followed. Patient was placed in a bulky, long-arm thumb spica splint and returned for suture removal 2weeks later. He was transitioned into a short arm cast for a period of 3months at which time plain lms and a CT scan were obtained demonstrating healing at the bone graft site (Fig.39.9). He was given a custom-fabri­cated splint to be weaned out of in 4–6weeks and initiated gentle range of motion with a skilled hand therapist. He was seen back 6months and 1year from surgery with excellent pain-free range of motion of the wrist and knee with no com­plication (Fig.39.10).
Fig. 39.8 Left wrist demonstrating a scaphoid waist nonunion with cystic resorption and sclerosis of the proximal pole without fragmentation or deformity (left—PA wrist; middle—coronal CT; right—scaphoid-axis, sagittal CT)
380
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. L. Logli and A. Y. Shin
Fig. 39.9 Left wrist demonstrating proximal and distal incorporation of the vascularized MFC graft approximately 3months after surgery (left— coronal CT; right—sagittal CT)
39 Medial Femoral Condyle Flap
381
Fig. 39.10 Patient returns 6months after surgery with a healed scaphoid, pain-free wrist, excellent motion, and no complication (top left—PA wrist; top right—healed medial knee incision; bottom left—nal wrist exion; bottom right—nal wrist extension)
382
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
39.8 Pearls andPitfalls 39.9 Selected Readings
• Sakai K, Doi K, Kawai S.Free vascularized thin cortico-
Pearls
• It is important to identify both the DGA and the sMGA and choose the largest caliber vessel to serve as the graft’s primary vascular supply. This is usu­ally, but not always, the DGA.
• Thin corticoperiosteal grafts are much easier to shape while large corticocancellous grafts will serve more of a structural role. Functional expecta­tions of the graft should be pre-determined to maxi­mize its potential.
• To ensure graft viability after being raised, check for bleeding edges of the periosteum, cortical, and cancellous bone.
Pitfalls
• In addition to raising the graft according to pre­planned dimensions, making an additional cut at a 45° angle just distal to the graft and elevating an extra wedge of bone allows for easier removal of the graft and decreases the risk of graft fracture or corticoperisoteal separation.
• Particularly when considering large grafts, it is crit­ical to identify and avoid important surrounding anatomy. The adductor magnus tendon, supercial femoral artery proper, supercial medial collateral ligament and knee joint capsule are such structures.
• While large, viable grafts can be obtained from the MFC region [34], we recommend the proxi­mal extent of the graft not pass the metaphyseal are due to the risk of iatrogenic femur fracture as has been observed before with femoral notching [35].
• For interposition scaphoid reconstruction, inset­ting of the graft is the most difcult part. Correction of DISI deformity and minimal bone resection of the proximal and distal poles is necessary. Overstufng has been suggested but is exceed­ingly difcult to accomplish. Normal anatomy is restored, and the length of the scaphoid rarely is “overstuffed” [37].
periosteal graft. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1991;87(2):290–8.
Sakai et al. provide us with the rst description in the
American literature of the MFC graft used in a free fash­ion. All 6 patients had upper extremity nonunions that previously failed one or more operations and went on to union 2–3.5months after being treated with a free corti­coperiosteal MFC graft.
• Larson AN, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Free medial femoral condyle bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions with humpback deformity and proximal pole avascular necrosis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2007;11(4): 246–58.
One of the most common applications for a free MFC
graft has been scaphoid nonunions, particularly when osteonecrosis of the proximal pole and/or deformity is present. This article presents our original surgical tech­nique, which has not changed considerably since.
• Hertel R, Masquelet AC.The reverse ow medial knee osteoperiosteal ap for skeletal reconstruction of the leg. Description and anatomical basis. Surg Radiol Anat. 1989;11(4):257–62.
This article presents the rst description of the contempo-
rary MFC graft in the American literature. It was described as a pedicled graft for treatment of local non­unions and osteonecrosis. More importantly, it describes the vascular basis for the MFC graft in the context of rel­evant surrounding anatomy through the cadaveric pro­section of 50 specimens.
• Hugon S, Koninckx A, Barbier O. Vascularized osteo­chondral graft from the medial femoral trochlea: anatomi­cal study and clinical perspectives. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(9):817–25.
The MFC graft can be modied into an osteochondral
ap using cartilage from the medial femoral trochlea. In these instances, it is typically referred to as an MFT graft. This article offers the rst anatomic evaluation of the MFT graft and suggests its feasibility for the treatment of defects often seen in Kienböck’s disease or proximal pole of the scaphoid pathology.
• Yamamoto H, Jones D Jr, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Shin A. The arterial anatomy of the medial femoral condyle and its clinical implications. J Hand Surg (European Volume). 2010;35(7):569–74.
These authors dene the microvascular anatomy of the
MFC graft while also reexploring the macrovascular
A. L. Logli and A. Y. Shin
39 Medial Femoral Condyle Flap
383
anatomy some 20years after its initial description. This work signicantly contributed to our understanding of the posterior-distal quadrant of the MFC to be the optimal location for ap elevation as it reliably has the highest density of perforating vessels.
• Oh C, Pulos N, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Intraoperative anat­omy of the vascular supply to the medial femoral condyle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(9):1503–8.
This work explores the intraoperative macrovascular
anatomy of the MFC graft in 113 patients. The major limitation of all prior anatomic descriptions was a reli­ance on information gained from a limited number of cadaveric specimens. It found the DGA to be present in 93% of patients and dominant 77% of the time with the sMGA absent in 2% of cases.
• Mehio G, Morsy M, Cayci C, Sabbagh MD, Shin AY, Bishop AT, etal. Donor-site morbidity and functional sta­tus following medial femoral condyle ap harvest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):734e–41e.
This article thoroughly explores knee donor site morbid-
ity related to MFC graft harvest in 75 patients. These authors found an overall complication rate of 18.6% with the majority being saphenous nerve paresthesias with increasing ap size as a signicant risk factor. Fifty-one percent of patients had functional outcomes comparable to a normal knee at 13months.
References
1. Acland R, Schusterman M, Godina M, Eder E, Taylor G, Carlisle I. The saphenous neurovascular free ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67(6):763–74.
2. Masquelet A, Nordin J, Guinot A. Vascularized transfer of the adductor magnus tendon and its osseous insertion: a preliminary report. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1985;1(3):169–74.
3. Sakai K.Free vascularized bone and periosteal graft for pseudar­throsis in the upper limb. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 1988;5:698–704.
4. Sakai K, Doi K, Kawai S.Free vascularized thin corticoperiosteal graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(2):290–8.
5. Doi K, Sakai K.Vascularized periosteal bone graft from the supra­condylar region of the femur. Microsurgery. 1994;15(5):305–15.
6. Fuchs B, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT.Free vascularized corticoperi­osteal bone graft for the treatment of persistent nonunion of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2005;14(3):264–8.
7. Huang TC-T, Sabbagh MD, Lu C-K, Steinmann SP, Moran SL.The vascularized medial femoral condyle free ap for reconstruction of segmental recalcitrant nonunion of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2019;28(12):2364–70.
8. Aibinder W, Torchia M, Bishop A, Shin A.Vascularized medial femoral condyle graft for manubrium nonunion: case report and review of the literature. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2017;26(3):173–9.
9. Muramatsu K, Doi K, Ihara K, Shigetomi M, Kawai S.Recalcitrant posttraumatic nonunion of the humerus: 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft: 23 patients reconstructed with vascu­larized bone graft. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(1):95–7.
10. Yajima H, Maegawa N, Ota H, Kisanuki O, Kawate K, Takakura Y. Treatment of persistent non-union of the humerus using a vas-
cularized bone graft from the supracondylar region of the femur. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2007;23(2):107–13.
11. Sammer DM, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Vascularized medial femoral condyle graft for thumb metacarpal reconstruction: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(4):715–8.
12. Doi K, Oda T, Soo-Heong T, Nanda V. Free vascularized bone graft for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):507–19.
13. Larson AN, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Free medial femoral condyle bone grafting for scaphoid nonunions with humpback deformity and proximal pole avascular necrosis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2007;11(4):246–58.
14. Jones DB Jr, Bürger H, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunions with an avascular proximal pole and carpal col­lapse. A comparison of two vascularized bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2616–25.
15. Choudry UH, Bakri K, Moran SL, Karacor Z, Shin AY.The vascu­larized medial femoral condyle periosteal bone ap for the treatment of recalcitrant bony nonunions. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(2):174–80.
16. Higgins JP, Bürger HK.Osteochondral aps from the distal femur: expanding applications, harvest sites, and indications. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(7):483–90.
17. Kazmers NH, Rozell JC, Rumball KM, Kozin SH, Zlotolow DA, Levin LS.Medial femoral condyle microvascular bone transfer as a treatment for capitate avascular necrosis: surgical technique and case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(10):841.e1–6.
18. Hachisuka H, Sunagawa T, Ochi M, Morrison WA.A vascularized medial femoral condyle cortico-periosteal graft for total lunate reconstruction. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25(2):354–8.
19. Hertel R, Masquelet AC.The reverse ow medial knee osteoperi­osteal ap for skeletal reconstruction of the leg. Description and anatomical basis. Surg Radiol Anat. 1989;11(4):257–62.
20. Cavadas PC, Landín L.Treatment of recalcitrant distal tibial non­union using the descending genicular corticoperiosteal free ap. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2008;64(1):144–50.
21. Doi K, Hattori Y.Vascularized bone graft from the supracondylar region of the femur. Microsurgery. 2009;29(5):379–84.
22. Hsu C-C, Loh CYY, Lin C-H, Lin Y-T, Lin C-H, Wong J.The medial femoral condyle ap to re-vitalise the femoral head for calcaneal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(7):974–6.
23. Choi JW, Jeong WS, Kwon SM, Koh KS.Medial femoral condyle free ap for premaxillary reconstruction in median facial dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(1):e57–60.
24. Taylor EM, Wu WW, Kamali P, Ferraro N, Upton J, Lin SJ, et al. Medial femoral condyle ap reconstruction of a maxillary defect with a 3D printing template. J Reconstr Microsurg Open. 2017;2(01):e63–8.
25. Banaszewski J, Gaggl A, Andruszko A. Medial femoral condyle free ap for head and neck reconstruction. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;27(2):130–5.
26. Martin D, Bitonti-Grillo C, De Biscop J, Schott H, Mondle J, Baudet J, etal. Mandibular reconstruction using a free vascularised osteocutaneous ap from the internal condyle of the femur. Br J Plast Surg. 1991;44(6):397–402.
27. Pulikkottil BJ, Pezeshk RA, Ramanadham SR, Haddock NT.The medial femoral condyle corticoperiosteal free ap for frontal sinus reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(3):813–6.
28. Kollitz KM, Pulos N, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Primary medial femo­ral condyle vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunions with carpal collapse and proximal pole avascular necrosis. J Hand Surg (European Volume). 2019;44(6):600–6.
29. Hugon S, Koninckx A, Barbier O.Vascularized osteochondral graft from the medial femoral trochlea: anatomical study and clinical perspectives. Surg Radiol Anat. 2010;32(9):817–25.
30. Houdek MT, Matsumoto JM, Morris JM, Bishop AT, Shin AY. Technique for 3-Dimesional (3D) modeling of osteoarticu-
384
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
A. L. Logli and A. Y. Shin
lar medial femoral condyle vascularized grafting to replace the proximal pole of unsalvagable scaphoid nonunions. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2016;20(3):117–24.
31. Yamamoto H, Jones D Jr, Moran SL, Bishop AT, Shin A.The arte­rial anatomy of the medial femoral condyle and its clinical implica­tions. J Hand Surg (European Volume). 2010;35(7):569–74.
32. Oh C, Pulos N, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Intraoperative anatomy of the vascular supply to the medial femoral condyle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(9):1503–8.
33. Iorio ML, Masden DL, Higgins JP.Cutaneous angiosome territory of the medial femoral condyle osteocutaneous ap. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):1033–41.
34. Iorio ML, Masden DL, Higgins JP. The limits of medial femoral condyle corticoperiosteal aps. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(10):1592–6.
35. Lesh ML, Schneider DJ, Deol G, Davis B, Jacobs CR, Pelligrini VD Jr. The consequences of anterior femoral notching in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical study. JBJS. 2000;82(8):1096.
36. Kakar S, Duymaz A, Steinmann S, Shin AY, Moran SL.Vascularized medial femoral condyle corticoperiosteal aps for the treatment of recalcitrant humeral nonunions. Microsurgery. 2011;31(2):85–92.
37. Giusti G, Bishop AT, Shin AY.Overstufng of unstable scaphoid nonunions: a radiographic analysis of carpal parameters. J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44(5):423.e1–6.
Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap
DimitrisReissis, DariushNikkhah, BernardLuczak, andGeorgiosOrfaniotis
40
40.1 Introduction
First described by Pedro Cavadas in 2001 [1], the Medial Sural Artery Perforator (MSAP) ap has quickly become a workhorse ap for reconstruction of both the head and neck and distal extremities [2, 3]. It is an evolution of the gastrocne- mius muscle ap (Fig.40.1), based on the musculocutaneous perforators arising through the medial gastrocnemius muscle.
Most commonly harvested as a free ap, the MSAP is primarily used to reconstruct small- to medium-sized defects where thin pliable tissue is required [46]. It is particularly useful for intra-oral reconstruction [714], for example after partial glossectomy. It is also used in reconstruction of lower leg, foot and ankle defects [4, 1517], as well as full thick­ness defects of the hand [1821], where other traditional aps such as the ALT may be too bulky.
It also has a role as a pedicled ap [22, 23], for defects around the knee and upper leg, and can include a muscle component if required to ll dead space. It is a particularly versatile ap, with potential to tailor the ap design with multiple skin paddles each based on their own musculocuta­neous perforators. It can also be harvested as a chimeric ap [2426] including sections of plantaris tendon [18], sural [27] or saphenous nerve [19] for composite reconstruction tailored to the defect.
In view of its inconspicuous donor site and reduced donor morbidity with preservation of major vessels, the MSAP has
D. Reissis (*) . D. Nikkhah Royal Free Hospital, London, UK e-mail: dreissis@nhs.net
B. Luczak Royal Perth Hospital, Western Australia, Australia
G. Orfaniotis Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
notable advantages over other free aps such as the radial forearm free ap [2831], for similar reconstructive indications.
40.2 Anatomy
The MSAP ap is located along an axis drawn from the mid­point of the popliteal crease to the medial malleolus of the ankle. Thus the skin paddle overlies the medial gastrocne­mius muscle.
The arterial supply is based on musculocutaneous perfo­rators originating from the supercial branch of the medial sural artery, which itself is a branch of the popliteal artery at the level of the knee joint [3234].
The distribution of these musculocutaneous perforators are variable, but almost universally present in all patients. Cavadas originally described an average of 2.2 perforators that can sustain the MSAP ap [1]. Further anatomical stud­ies demonstrate a range of 2–8 perforators supplying the medial sural artery perforator territory, usually with a domi­nant perforator present [11, 34]. The intra-muscular branch­ing patterns of the medial sural artery perforators has been classied as having single vessel perforators in 31%, two in 59% and three or more in 10% cases [32].
The perforators are most commonly located 12–17 cm below the popliteal crease along the line drawn from the mid­point of the popliteal crease to the prominence of the medial malleolus [32]. A dominant perforator is most often found 13 (±2) cm inferior and 2.5 (±1) cm lateral to the midpoint of the popliteal crease [32]. No perforator is found either less than 6cm or more than 18cm below the popliteal crease [11, 34].
The course of the perforator is intra-muscular through the medial head of gastrocnemius. The pedicle initially runs proximally towards the popliteal crease in the supercial muscle bres of medial gastrocnemius muscle. After a short supercial course the vessel deepens down into the belly of gastrocnemius muscle giving multiple branches around
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_40
385
386
ab
cd
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
D. Reissis et al.
Fig.40.1 (a) Pre-op markings of the pedicled Gastrocnemius muscle ap with the primary incision already made. The ap most often utilises the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle, which in this case will be used to reconstruction a defect on the antero-lateral aspect of the knee. (b) Dissection of the medial head of gastrocnemius muscle, prior to division of the distal tendinous insertion. (c) Tension-free transfer of the
pedicled gastrocnemius muscle ap into the recipient site defect on the antero-lateral knee. The muscle and distal tendon are secured in place and a skin graft placed over the muscle. (d) Healed gastrocnemius mus­cle ap with overlying skin graft at 6months post-operatively. (Case Courtesy of D Nikkhah)
360°. Occasionally, the perforator may initially travel supra­fascially along the muscle fascia for some distance prior to perforating through the supercial fascia, which must be identied early during dissection to avoid pedicle injury [4].
The length of the pedicle can range from 8 to 16 cm, depending on the location of the perforator and degree of dissection towards its origin from the medial sural artery [35,
36]. The arterial diameter of the vascular pedicle taken up to
the medial sural artery is most commonly 1–2mm [11]. This allows for tailoring of the pedicle length and vessel diameter to the defect being reconstructed and recipient vessels avail­able. In the case of trauma or prior radiation to the recipient site, one can harvest a pedicle of adequate length to allow microvascular anastomosis outside the zone of trauma or
radiation, with access to a choice of recipient vessels, for either end-to-end or end-to side anastomosis.
Venous outow is via the venae comitantes which parallel the course of the perforators and have a slightly larger diam­eter than the artery (3.5mm). If required, an additional vein such as the short or long saphenous vein can be incorporated into the MSAP to improve venous drainage.
No nerve is usually included in the ap meaning it is insensate. However, harvesting the MSAP with a segment of the sural, saphenous or motor nerve to the gastrocnemius muscle as a nerve graft, may allow for functional reconstruc­tion in the appropriate patient and setting [27].
The thickness of the aps usually is as thin as 5 mm (range, 4–8mm), allowing for a smooth prole where thin