Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3600_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
36 Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) Flap: AReliable Alternative forBreast Reconstruction
345
36.5 Flap Raise/Elevation: AStep-by-Step Guide
1. Patient Positioning and Skin Incision. With the patient
lying supine on the operating table, the thigh is abducted and the knee exed, while paying attention to pressure areas around the ankle. Pressure sores and sciatica have been reported as possible complications. Pneumatic calf compression is used routinely for deep venous thrombo­sis prophylaxis (Figs.36.5 and 36.6). Staples can be used to mark opposing margins of the skin paddle. A cold blade is used to incise around the skin paddle markings.
2. Anterior Raising of the Flap. Flap raising is started on the anterior aspect of the ap keeping the plane of dissec­tion on the supercial fascia to avoid inadvertent harvest of lymphatic tissues until the great saphenous vein comes into view. Medial to the great saphenous vein the plane of dissection changes (Fig.36.7). A deeper incision allows visualising the adductor longus fascia, which is incised and included in the ap. If a tributary of the great saphe­nous vein is seen crossing the skin paddle, this is divided near the great vein and included with the harvest.
3. Superior Margin Dissection. While the fascia over the adductor longus can be incised to be included of the ap care must be taken to preserve the fascia over the gracilis muscle for a 2–3cm superiorly to prevent the muscle con­tracting and skin perforators being damaged (Fig.36.8). The plane can get deeper once again posterior to this muscle. 2–3cm from the posterior midline care must be taken not to divide the deep fascia to avoid injury to the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh.
4. Inferior Margin Dissection. The thigh skin just inferior to the incision can be undermined to augment the amount of tissue harvested with the ap. Once more it is preferable to respect the gracilis fascia when visualised (Fig.36.9).
Figs. 36.5 and 36.6 Positioning of patient with pillow under legs and intermittent pneumatic compression devices on legs
Fig. 36.7 Anterior raising of skin paddle. A tributary to the great saphenous vein can be taken with the ap
346
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
J. E. Berner and A. Blackburn
Fig. 36.8 The gracilis muscle is identied
5. Identication of the Gracilis Pedicle. The loose areolar tissue between the gracilis and adductor longus can be released until the pedicle is visualised. It is advisable not to discard any vessels until the gracilis pedicle is conrmed as other muscle branches run in its vicinity (Fig.36.10).
6. Dissection around Gracilis Muscle. Once the position of the pedicle has been conrmed, dissection through the loose areolar tissue around the gracilis muscle can be per­formed superior and inferior to the vessels. (Fig.36.11).
7. Pedicle Dissection. The gracilis pedicle can be then dis- sected following its course in between adductor longus and magnus with the help of a Travers self-retaining retractor. Obturator nerve branches to adductor longus and should be spared as they run over the pedicle to avoid untoward morbidity. Dissection is nished when the medial circumex femoral artery is seen. Large branches coming from the pedicle to adductor longus and magnus need to be controlled using ligaclips (Fig.36.12).
Fig. 36.9 The ap can then be islanded by committing with the infe­rior and posterior incisions
8. Completion of Raising and Detachment. A mobile ped- icle eases the rest of the gracilis muscle dissection. Perfusion of the skin paddle can then be conrmed. The gracilis muscle is then divided as proximal as possible while protecting the pedicle. The process is repeated infe­riorly. Even though muscle tends to atrophy, it can still add volume to the ap and it is a suitable bed for future fat grafting. Once ready for transfer, the artery and vein to gracilis can be clipped and divided.
9. Closure of the Donor Site. A size 16 drain is placed in the defect left by the gracilis harvest, exiting anteriorly in the groin. Meticulous closure is key for donor site com­plication avoidance. We prefer to use skin staples as pro­visional closure, paying attention to address any potential posterior dog ear deformity (Fig.36.13). Layered closure from posterior to anterior, with interrupted 2–0 Vicryl and 3–0 Monocryl, is adequate.
36 Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) Flap: AReliable Alternative forBreast Reconstruction
Fig. 36.10 Retraction of the adductor longus muscle reveals the pedi­cle to the gracilis nerve along with the branch to gracilis from the obtu­rator nerve
347
Fig. 36.11 The gracilis muscle can be retracted using two gauzes which facilitates dissection through the areolar plain between adductor longus and magnus muscles
Fig. 36.12 Dissection of the pedicle is complete when the source ves­sel is reached
Fig. 36.13 Temporary closure using staples allows avoiding a poste­rior dog ear deformity when suturing the donor site
348
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
J. E. Berner and A. Blackburn
36.6 Core Surgical Techniques inFlap Dissection
1. Patient Positioning and Skin Incision. Even though
raising does not take long for this ap, hyperabduction of the hip and pressure sores in the lateral ankle area should be avoided. An assistant holding the abducted thigh can help avoid this issue.
2. Anterior Raising of the Flap. We perform most of the
skin paddle dissection using nger-switch diathermy in coagulation mode. Dissection around the great saphenous vein can be performed using Debakey forceps and tenot­omy scissors.
3. Superior Margin Dissection: Trying to incorporate tis-
sues superior to this incision is usually pointless, as there is minimal subcutaneous fat on the groin and gluteal creases. As previously mentioned, injury to the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh should be avoided.
4. Identication of the Gracilis Pedicle. The artery and
vein to gracilis enter the ap with its nerve, classically described as forming a 45 degree angle.
5. Dissection around Gracilis Muscle. Finger dissection
superior and inferior to the pedicle allows freeing the muscle circumferentially. A moist gauze can be used to wrap around the gracilis muscle as a visual aid assisting in the later dissection.
6. Pedicle Dissection. After identifying the vessels to graci-
lis, these can be dissected out using bipolar diathermy and Debakey forceps. We reserve the use of ligaclips for large branches only. Even though these provide adequate control, they can also easily get in the way while dissect­ing under adductor longus. The heat-sinking technique protecting the pedicle with the Debakey forces avoids heat damaging it.
7. Completion of Raising and Detachment. We do not
routinely harvest the whole muscle, but some length can
be useful to ll the upper breast pole. It is advisable if bilateral TUG aps are raised, that the surgeon detaching the muscle does so at both sides. This allows harvesting similar muscle length.
8. Closure of the Donor Site. We have recently adopted the use of barbed sutures to accelerate donor site closure. This is technically more difcult to get right compared with interrupted stitching. We advise putting a few deep 2–0 vicryl stitches to preserve tissue alignment before using the barbed suture.
36.7 Clinical Scenario
36.7.1 Bilateral TUG
A 56-year-old female patient previously treated for breast cancer with bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies and implant­based reconstructions, presenting worsening capsular con­tracture (Fig. 36.14a). She was referred to our service for consideration of salvage with bilateral autologous recon­struction. CT-angiography demonstrated lack of suitable abdominal perforators, therefore decided to proceed with bilateral TUG aps. A rst stage free ap surgery was per­formed, including monitoring skin paddles (Fig.36.14b) was later followed by excision of the skin paddles under local anaesthetic, nipple reconstruction with local ap and tattoo­ing of the areola (Fig.36.14c).
36.7.2 Unilateral TUG
A 45-year-old female patient that underwent a skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast and nipple reconstruction with a TUG ap (Fig.36.15a, b).
36 Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) Flap: AReliable Alternative forBreast Reconstruction
ab
c
349
Fig. 36.14 (a–c) Case of bilateral breast reconstruction with TUG aps
350
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
J. E. Berner and A. Blackburn
ab
Fig. 36.15 (a, b) Case of unilateral breast reconstruction with TUG aps
36.8 Pearls andPitfalls
Pearls
• The transverse skin paddle of the TUG ap can be modied to a more diagonal direction to avoid plac­ing a posterior scar in a pressure area [13]. We have used an L-shaped modication to increase the vol­ume of this ap (approximately 30–40%) with good results [14].
• The dissection of the pedicle as it reaches the medial circumex femoral artery can be difcult as the adductor longus needs to be retracted. If this step is problematic the lateral septum of the adductor longus can be opened up, allowing direct visualisation of the gracilis pedicle as it reaches its source vessel [15].
• For immediate breast reconstruction cases, we pre­fer accessing the internal mammary vessels under the fourth costal cartilage, as at this level there is less calibre mismatch with the gracilis pedicle.
• For insetting this ap in immediate breast recon­struction cases, we prefer to place the anterior limb of the ap medially and the skin paddle along the bottom to recreate the medial, inferior and lateral poles. The inferior gracilis muscle stump can be secured in the upper pole, which usually requires subsequent fat grafting.
• Immediate nipple reconstruction can be achieved with a TUG ap [10] (Fig.36.16).
Fig. 36.16 Immediate nipple–areola complex reconstruction coning a TUG ap
Pitfalls
• As previously mentioned, the muscle division is best if performed by the same surgeon, so similar volumes can be harvested.
• For delayed breast reconstruction, excessive coning of the ap to increase projection can result in an unnatural narrow breast.
• The operating microsurgeon should be prepared to perform end-to-side arterial anastomosis if the ves­sel calibre mismatch is close to 3:1.
36 Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) Flap: AReliable Alternative forBreast Reconstruction
351
36.9 Selected Readings
1. ZM Arnez, D Pogorelec, F Planinsek, U Ahcan. Breast Reconstruction by the Free Transverse Gracilis (TUG) Flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2004 Jan;57(1):20-6.
Inceptional paper that later popularised the use of this ap as a second option for breast reconstruction, demon­strating its safety and applications
2. Russe E, Kholosy H, Weitgasser L, Brandstetter M, Traintinger H, Neureiter J, Wechselberger G, Schoeller T. Autologous fat grafting for enhancement of breast reconstruction with a transverse myocutaneous gracilis ap: a cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Nov;71(11):1557–62.
This outcomes study demonstrates the utility of adjunct fat transfer to optimise results after TUG aps for breast reconstruction
3. Saour S, Libondi G, Ramakrishnan V. Microsurgical Renements With the Use of Internal Mammary (IM) Perforators as Recipient Vessels in Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2017 Aug;6(4):375–9.
The internal mammary vessels are the recipient of preference. The TUG fap has a shorter pedicle than the DIEP ap. Therefore, it is helpful to have recipient in the wound
4. Fattah A, Figus A, Mathur B, Ramakrishnan VV.The trans­verse Myocutaneous Gracilis ap: technical renements. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Feb;63(2):305–13.
This article contains an excellent description of the
TUG ap raising technique
5. Park JE, Alkureishi LWT, Song DH.TUGs Into VUGs and Friendly BUGs: Transforming the Gracilis Territory Into the Best Secondary Breast Reconstructive Option. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Sep;136(3):447–54.
This paper describes some of the skin paddle modi-
cations for the TUG ap.
3. Yousif NJ, Matloub HS, Kolachalam R, Grunert BK, Sanger JR.The transverse Gracilis musculocutaneous ap. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29:482. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637- 199212000- 00002.
4. Schoeller T, Wechselberger G. Breast reconstruction by the free transverse Gracilis (TUG) ap. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:481.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2004.02.016.
5. Arnez ZM, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F, Ahcan U.Breast reconstruc­tion by the free transverse Gracilis (TUG) ap. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.007.
6. Moller L, Berner JE, Dheansa B. The reconstructive journey: description of the breast reconstruction pathway in a high-volume UK-based microsurgical Centre. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:1930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.07.017.
7. Rozen WM, Patel NG, Ramakrishnan VV. Increasing options in autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction: four free aps for “stacked” bilateral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2016;5:255.
8. Dayan JH, Allen RJ. Lower extremity free aps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:77S. https://doi.
org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003944.
9. Sacak B, Gurunluoglu R. The innervated Gracilis muscle for microsurgical functional lip reconstruction: review of the lit­erature. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:204. https://doi.org/10.1097/
SAP.0b013e3182920c99.
10. Fattah A, Figus A, Mathur B, Ramakrishnan VV. The trans­verse Myocutaneous Gracilis ap: technical renements. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
bjps.2008.10.015.
11. Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruc­tion with the Profunda artery perforator ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:16e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182363d9f.
12. Nicholas T, Haddock SST. Consecutive 265 Profunda artery per­forator aps: renements, satisfaction, and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8 https://doi.org/10.1097/
GOX.0000000000002682.
13. Dayan E, Smith ML, Sultan M, Samson W, Dayan JH.The diagonal upper Gracilis (DUG) ap: a safe and improved alternative to the TUG ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:33–4.
14. Berner JE, Henton JMD, Blackburn A. The L-shaped modica­tion of the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) ap. Eur J Plast Surg. 2020;43:1–6.
15. King ICC, Obeid N, Woollard AC, Jones ME.Maximizing length and safety in gracilis free ap dissection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1452–3.
References
1. Heckler FR. Gracilis Myocutaneous and muscle aps. Surg: Clin Plast; 1980. p.7.
2. Zukowski M, Lord J, Ash K, Shouse B, Getz S, Robb G. The Gracilis free ap revisited: a review of 25 cases of transfer to trau­matic extremity wounds. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;40:141. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00000637- 199802000- 00006.
Medial Circumflex Femoral
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
RobertMiller, DariushNikkhah, andGraemeGlass
37
37.1 Introduction
The gracilis ap is a versatile option for regional and free ap reconstruction. First published in 1952 by Pickrell as a pedicle muscle ap for anal reconstruction [1] it was thereaf­ter described as a pedicled musculocutaneous ap [2, 3] and nally as a free ap in 1976 [4]. In the form of a free ap it has become a well-established reconstructive option for small extremity wounds, functional limb reconstruction and facial reanimation. As a pedicle ap, it is used in groin, peri­neal and vaginal reconstruction. With a single dominant vas­cular pedicle supplemented by additional segmental minor pedicles, it is a type II ap according the to the classication of Mathes and Nahai [5].
The exibility of the gracilis ap lies with the fact that a
variable length of muscle may be harvested, from a short segment centred on the dominant pedicle to the entire length of the muscle including tendon. Further modications include the addition of a portion of adductor longus muscle as a chimeric ap [6] or the inclusion of a perforator-based fasciocutaneous component based on a cutaneous perforator
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 07678- 7_37.
R. Miller (*) Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, St. George’s Hospital, London, UK
D. Nikkhah Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Free London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
University College London, London, UK
G. Glass Attending Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar
Plastic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA e-mail: gglass@sidra.org
from the main pedicle. Moreover, with a single motor nerve branch it may be utilized as a functional muscle ap. As it can be raised either as a muscle ap or a musculocutaneous ap, there is versatility in both volume and texture. Moreover, the muscle will atrophy with time and is thus useful when contour adaptation is important [7]. Importantly, with an excellent donor site scar hidden in the medial thigh and almost no power decit in thigh adduction post-harvest, the use of this ap is without appreciable donor site morbidity.
37.2 Anatomy
The gracilis has a broad origin from the inferior portion of the pubic symphysis and inferior ramus of the pubis with both muscular and tendinous components. It then tapers into a slender, at and thin muscle running supercially down the medial thigh. In the proximal thigh, the gracilis is found medial and posterior to the adductor longus (AL), of which the proximal tendon can be easily palpated in the medial thigh with the patient lying supine in a frog leg position. The distal third of the muscle then runs posteriorly to the sartorius, and anteriorly to the adductor magnus, as it passes posteriorly to the medial femoral condyle along with the sartorius. The gracilis inserts between the sartorius (anterior) and semitendi­nosus (posterior) tendons on the anteromedial aspect of the proximal tibia, together forming the pes anserinus.
The gracilis is based on a single dominant vascular pedi­cle. Most commonly this is the terminal branch of the medial femoral circumex artery, in turn arising from the profunda femoris artery. However, the dominant pedicle may also arise from the profunda femoris artery directly. On entering the muscle, the artery divides, most commonly into three branches [8] before ultimately forming anastomoses with the minor pedicles. Additional minor pedicles are present with the most common conguration consisting of two minor pedicles [9] usually from the supercial femoral artery, although the distal minor pedicle may arise from the popli-
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_37
353
354
R. Miller et al.
teal artery [9]. Usually the arterial pedicle is accompanied by two venae comitantes which join prior to draining into the profunda femoris vein. The length of the venous pedicle is therefore 1–2cm shorter than the arterial pedicle, which is approximately 7cm in length [6].
The presence of at least one skin perforator measuring over 0.5mm has been reported in the majority of cases [8,
10]. Skin perforators are most consistently found over the
proximal third of the muscle, loosely associated with the position of the dominant pedicle [8, 9, 11]. Predominantly, the skin perforators pursue a musculocutaneous course but septocutaneous (between gracilis and AL) skin perforators have also been described.
Motor innervation to the gracilis is from a single anterior branch of the obturator nerve (L2–4), which runs between the gracilis and AL supplying both. The nerve can be found deep to the vessels, entering the muscle approximately 1–1.5cm proximal (superior) to the pedicle [6, 12]. It may be dissected under adductor longus [8] to its bifurcaton with the posterior branch which supplies adductor magnus and (usu­ally) adductor brevis. The posterior branch must be pre­served. Typically, the distance from the point of entry into gracilis and the bifurcation with the posterior branch is 4-5cm, in our experience, or 2–4cm from the obturator fora­men. A sensory branch of the anterior obturator nerve sup­plying the medial thigh skin (medial cutaneous nerve of the thigh) runs as a separate branch in tandem to the motor branch [6].
An appreciation of the above anatomy is particularly important when considering ap thinning in cases of facial reanimation, for example. The muscle can be thinned but great care must be taken when doing so to avoid compromis­ing the vascular supply and/or nerve input to the portion of the muscle designated to the ap.
37.4 Flap Design andMarkings
37.4.1 Marking
With the patient supine in a frog leg position (hip abducted and the knee exed), the adductor longus tendon is clearly palpated and marked. The gracilis can be palpated posterior/ inferiorly (approximately two nger breadths) to this in the medial thigh. Its origin should be identied and marked from the inferior portion of the pubic symphysis and inferior ramus of the pubis. Finally, the medial tibial condyle should be palpated and marked to indicate its insertion (Fig.37.1). A line connecting the midpoint of the origin to the insertion should be marked. The proximal two-thirds represent the muscle component and the distal third the tendon. Approximately 10cm distal to the inferior pubic symphysis is marked as the most likely site of the pedicle and skin per­forators, which enter the ap from the superior lateral aspect.
37.4.2 Flap Design
Flap design will depend on the indication. There are no sig­nicant differences to ap design for a pedicle or free ap. If the gracilis muscle alone is needed, an incision should be marked approximately 2cm posterior to the main portion of the muscle body, with or without a secondary incision marked over the insertion. The length of the proximal inci­sion and need for a secondary incision at the insertion will depend on the length of muscle and tendon required, and should be adapted accordingly.
37.3 Pre-Operative Investigations
Routine pre-operative imaging is not indicated. However, angiography studies may be pertinent in patients with prior upper thigh/ pelvic injury or surgery. It has been suggested that pre-operative non-invasive angiography may be used to predict the territory supplied by different pedicle arrange­ments, facilitating a safer approach to the design of compos­ite tissue aps [13]. Similarly, while hand held-Doppler is not used routinely pre- or intra-operatively for gracilis mus­cle harvest alone, it may be used to identify perforators when incorporating a cutaneous component into gracilis ap design [10].
Fig. 37.1 The adductor longus (AL) is palpated and then marked. Approximately 2 cm posterior to this the gracilis is palpated and marked. The course of the pedicle is also marked (black arrow)
37 Medial Circumex Femoral Artery: Gracilis Muscle Flap
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
If a musculocutaneous ap is needed, an oval-shaped skin paddle should be designed over the gracilis muscle. If a short paddle is needed, this should be centred over the muscle pedicle. If a longer paddle is required, this should be designed as an extension of the short paddle to incorporate the most reliable perforators. It should be remembered that the distal skin paddle may be unreliable and careful evaluation of the perforator arrangement is necessary as part of the approach considered here [14]. The width of the ap should not exceed the ability to close the skin directly without tension. This is typically up to 5cm but the ‘nger grasp’ test to evaluate the feasibility of primary closure is essential before committing [6]. A transverse skin paddle design has also been described [13, 15] which can be harvested as a musculocutaneous ap or fasciocutaneous ap based on a mapped perforator [16].
355
37.5 Flap Raise/Elevation– AStep-by-Step
Guide
The patient should be positioned supine, with the knee exed and the hip exed and abducted (externally rotated). In this position the hip, knee and foot must be supported to stabilize the position (Fig.37.2).
Step 1. Incise the skin based on the above discussed
markings. If raising a musculocutaneous ap, incise just
the distal aspect or at the tendon insertion if harvesting
tendon.
Step 2. Identify and preserve the great saphenous vein
(GSV) running obliquely over the AL and gracilis
(Fig.37.3).
Step 3. Incise down to the gracilis muscle fascia
(Fig.37.4). (a) If raising a musculocutaneous ap, incise down to the
gracilis tendon. Identify the gracilis as it runs distally to insert between the sartorius and semitendinosus.
Fig. 37.2 Patient positioned in frog leg position
Fig. 37.3 Identication of the great saphenous vein (black arrow)
supercially
Identify the muscle and conrm that the designed skin paddle is orientated over the muscle. Continue the incision proximally and along the anterior border of the skin paddle. Alternatively, a new proximal inci­sion can be made on the anterior aspect of the skin paddle.
Step 4. Incise the fascia exposing the AL superiorly and the anterior border of the gracilis inferiorly. Continue the fascial incision exposing the required gracilis muscle length (Fig.37.5).
Step 5. Isolate the muscle from the surrounding tissue using blunt dissection.
Step 6. Gently retract the gracilis medially and superiorly to help identify and protect the pedicle.
Step 7. Separate the fascial connections between the grac­ilis and AL anterior medially, adductor magnus posterior and sartorius distally until the pes anserinus.
Step 8. Retract the AL laterally and superiorly/ anteriorly to facilitate dissection of the neurovascular pedicle enter­ing the muscle posteriorly (Fig.37.6).
(a) For the musculocutaneous ap, identify the AL-
gracilis septum and include this in the pedicle dissec­tion (to include septocutaneous perforators. However, also remember, the main pedicle may run a septocuta­neous course).
Step 9. Dissect the pedicle proximally as it runs between the adductor longus and magnus, ligating branches to the adductor longus (Fig.37.7).
Step 10. Identify the motor nerve deep and separate to the vessels (Fig. 37.8). Dissect the nerve to the required length, if needed.