Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_3600_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
85 Мб
Скачать
33 The Groin Flap: TheWorkhorse Flap forUpper Limb Reconstruction
323
• Sabapathy SR, Bajantri B. Indications, Selection and use of distant pedicled aps in upper limb reconstryction. Hand Clin 2014;30(2):185–199.
An article which provides all the important technical tips to obtain good outcomes with the pedicled groin and abdominal aps.
References
1. McGregor IA, Jackson IT.The groin ap. Br J Plast Surg. 1972 Jan;25(1):3–16.
2. Taylor GI, Daniel RK.The free ap: composite tissue transfer by vascular anastomosis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1973 Jul;43(1):1–3.
3. Bajantri B, Latheef L, Sabapathy SR. Tips to orient pedicled groin ap for hand defects. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2013 Jun;17(2):68–71.
4. Jokuszies A, Niederbichler AD, Hirsch N, Kahlmann D, Herold C, Vogt PM. The pedicled groin ap for defect closure of the hand. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Oct;22(4):440–51.
5. Cobb ARM, Koudstaal MJ, Bulstrode NW, Lloyd TW, Dunaway DJ.Free groin ap in hemifacial volume reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;51(4):301–6.
6. Aydin T, Feyzi K, Tayfun T, Berna T. Reconstruction of wide scrotal defect using groin fasciocutaneous island ap combined with a strip of deep fascia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Aug;63(8):1394–5.
7. Zeltzer AA, Anzarut A, Braeckmans D, Seidenstuecker K, Hendrickx B, Van Hedent E, et al. The vascularized groin lymph
node ap (VGLN): anatomical study and ap planning using multi­detector CT scanner. The golden triangle for ap harvesting. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(3):378–83.
8. Hough M, Fenn C, Kay SP.The use of free groin aps in children. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1161–6.
9. Chuang DC, Jeng SF, Chen HT, Chen HC, Wei FC.Experience of 73 free groin aps. Br J Plast Surg. 1992 Mar;45(2):81–5.
10. Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classication of fascio-cutaneous aps according to their patterns of vascularisation. Br J Plast Surg. 1984 Jan;37(1):80–7.
11. Sinna R, Hajji H, Qassemyar Q, Perignon D, Benhaim T, Havet E. Anatomical background of the perforator ap based on the deep branch of the supercial circumex iliac artery (SCIP ap): a cadaveric study. Eplasty. 2010 Jan 18;10:e11.
12. Gentileschi S, Servillo M, De Bonis F, Albanese R, Pino V, Mangialardi ML, etal. Radioanatomical study of the pedicle of the supercial circumex iliac perforator ap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Nov;35(9):669–76.
13. Tashiro K, Harima M, Kato M, Yamamoto T, Yamashita S, Narushima M, etal. Preoperative color Doppler ultrasound assess­ment in planning of SCIP aps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jul;68(7):979–83.
14. Kimura N, Saitoh M, Hasumi T, Sumiya N, Itoh Y. Clinical application and renement of the microdissected thin groin ap transfer operation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Nov;62(11):1510–6.
15. Smith PJ, Foley B, McGregor IA, Jackson IT.The anatomical basis of the groin ap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1972 Jan;49(1):41–7.
16. Knutson GH. 7. The groin ap: a new technique to repair traumatic tissue defects. Can Med Assoc J. 1977 Mar 19;116(6):623–5.
Superficial Circumflex Iliac Artery
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Perforator Flap: AThin andVersatile Option forLimb andHead andNeck Reconstruction
JuanEnriqueBerner, DariushNikkhah, andTiewChongTeo
34.1 Introduction
The supercial circumex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) ap was rst described by Koshima etal. in 2004 [1], as the evo­lution of the free groin ap popularised by McGregor and Jackson [2]. The SCIP ap can be a thin reconstructive option for most patients, by harvesting skin superior and lat­eral to the inguinal ligament.
The donor site can be easily closed primarily even when large aps are designed, leaving a well concealed oblique scar on the iliac fossa. Dissection of the ap and its pedicle is relatively supercial, avoiding tedious raising in difcult anatomical planes. The vascular anatomy of the SCIP ap allows the raising of multiple skin paddles, lymph nodes [3] and even small segments of iliac crest bone [4]. This versatil­ity has been the reason for its recent popularity for lower limb [5], hand [6] and head and neck reconstruction [7].
We have recently proposed a classication system for SCIP aps based on the contents transferred [6]:
• Type 1: Standard SCIP ap.
• Type 2: Adipofascial SCIP ap.
• Type 3: SCIP ap with multiple skin paddles.
• Type 4: Osteocutaneous SCIP ap.
• Type 5: SCIP ap with vascularised lymph node transfer.
• Type 6: Neurotised SCIP ap.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at [https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 07678- 7_34].
J. E. Berner (*) Royal Victoria Inrmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
D. Nikkhah Royal Free Hospital, London, UK e-mail: d.nikkhah@nhs.net
T. C. Teo Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead, UK
34
It has been criticised that its small calibre and short pedicle limit the applications of this ap. However, adequate planning and recipient vessel selection can facilitate its execution.
34.2 Anatomy
The supercial circumex iliac artery (SCIA) is a cutaneous branch arising from the femoral artery close to the origin of the supercial inferior epigastric artery. The SCIA supplies skin, tegumentum and supercial lymph nodes in the groin area. It follows a supero-lateral course branching into a super­cial/medial and a deep/lateral branch [8]. The deep branch runs in the deep fascia, providing muscular perforators to the sartorius muscle, and the skin and iliac bone lateral to this muscle. The supercial branch, instead, follows a superior course crossing the level of the inguinal ligament. It pierces the supercial fascia to then supply the skin superior and later­ally heading towards the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS).
The SCIP ap can be harvested based on perforators aris­ing from the deep/lateral or supercial/medial branches, or even both to obtain a chimeric ap [9]. However, if a single skin paddle is needed, the supercial/medial perforator is more amenable for dissection. This can be found in the great majority of patients around a point 4.5cm lateral to the pubic tubercle and 1.5cm superior to it [10].
The length of the pedicle of the SCIP ap will depend on the design of its skin paddle. A more laterally placed ap will therefore have a longer pedicle. The average length of the SCIP pedicle is 6cm, but can be as long as 8cm, including vessels of around 1mm calibre [6].
Compared to the traditional groin ap, the SCIP presents multiple advantages. Its pedicle length can be adjusted as it can be directly incised along its course. The SCIP is a thinner ap, as it can be safely raised at the level of Scarpa’s fascia until the pedicle is reached, compared to the groin ap which has to include the deep fascia over sartorius. Furthermore, due to its location inferior to the inguinal ligament, the groin ap is more likely to include hair bearing skin.
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_34
325
326
ab
J. E. Berner et al.
34.3 Pre-Operative Investigation
In some centres, the use of computed tomography angiogra­phy (CTA) has been advocated to facilitate the planning of the SCIP ap [11]. However, in our experience this is not routinely required. With the patient lying supine in the opera­tive table, the location of the supercial/medial SCIA perfo­rator can be conrmed using a hand-held Doppler device.
More recently, Pereira etal. have proposed the use of aug­mented reality for planning SCIP aps. If a CTA has been performed, smartphone-based technology can combine the vascular anatomy with the supercial landmarks in order to ease raising [12]
34.4 Flap Design andMarkings
Considering the dimensions of the defect, the SCIP skin paddle can be designed as an ellipse, including the non­hair- bearing skin above the inguinal ligament (Fig. 34.1).
Fig. 34.1 Landmarks drawn before SCIP ap transfer. The ASIS is marked and a line drawn to the pubic tubercle; this illustrates the ingui­nal ligament. 2cm below this is the SCIA emerging from the femoral artery. The SCIP perforator is marked emerging superolaterally above the inguinal ligament
We tend to orientate this ellipse parallel to the supero-lateral course of the latter. This particular location allows harvest­ing a thin ap, while allowing a tensionless closure by mobilising abdominal tissues. As we prefer to raise this ap in an anterograde manner, we also mark an incision line over the course of the SCIP pedicle [6]. This is not required if the ap is raised retrogradely, in other words, from lateral to medial.
34.5 Flap Raise/Elevation: AStep-by-Step Guide
1. Incision over SCIP pedicle. An incision over the course of
the previously identied SCIP pedicle is performed using a number 15 or 10 blade. We routinely prefer using perfo­rators arising from the medial/supercial branch of the SCIA.Sharp dissection is continued through the super­cial ap until the pedicle is visualized (Fig.34.2a, b). We prefer using the medial to lateral approach as demon­strated here.
2. Pedicle dissection. Using a combination of blunt, sharp
and bipolar dissection the SCIP pedicle is dissected along its course. Debakey forces are used carefully handling the vessels. The pedicle is traced to its origin on the SCIA (Fig.34.3a, b).
3. Pedicle appraisal and ap design adjustment. Once the
pedicle has been exposed it can be appraised before com­mitting to the raising of the skin paddle. If necessary its design can be adjusted to obtain a longer pedicle (Fig.34.4).
4. Skin ap raising and incorporation of extra supercial
vein. While protecting the previously dissected pedicle, the margins of the ap can be incised using a cold blade. Raising can be done either at the level of the external oblique muscle fascia, or through Scarpa’s fas­cia using nger-switch diathermy [13] (Fig.34.5a). We
Fig. 34.2 (a) Landmarks of the SCIP ap before elevation. (b) Medial approach to SCIP ap, showing identication of the supercial perforator
ab
34 Supercial Circumex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap: AThin andVersatile Option forLimb andHead andNeck Reconstruction
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Fig. 34.3 (a) Dissection of SCIP pedicle adjusting desired pedicle length and dissection down to its origin at the SCIA (b)
a
327
Fig. 34.4 The skin paddle is nalised after templating the defect to be reconstructed
b
also routinely include an extra supercial vein. (Fig.34.5b).
5. Pedicle division and transfer. The pedicle can be then clipped in its origin and divided for transfer. By this stage the recipient vessels should be prepared. If anastomosing to a perforator on the recipient site, this can be done end­to- end. If anastomosing to a named vessel is preferred, usually it is done end-to-side due to vessel discrepancy (Fig.34.6).
6. Donor site closure. Abdominal laxity allows tensionless closure of large aps in the groin area. It is important not to undermine the abdomen to avoid contour defor­mities. Closure is obtained by using 2–0 PDS dermal sutures and 3–0 monocryl subcuticular suture
Fig. 34.5 (a) The ap is raised off the external oblique fascia superi- orly and (b) an extra supercial vein is incorporated into the skin ap
(Fig.34.7).
328
Fig. 34.6 The pedicle is divided before SCIP transfer. The vein is marked with blue ink. A pedicle length of 6cm was taken in this case
J. E. Berner et al.
to carefully retract vessels as the pedicle is freed up from neighbouring tissues.
3. Pedicle appraisal and ap design adjustment. It is advan- tageous to adjust the ap design to include any super­cial veins in its vicinity. This can be later used as a lifeboat if drainage via the SCIP venae comitans is inadequate.
4. Skin ap raising. At this point it is convenient to have an assistant holding Senn-Mueller retractors, especially if dissection through Scarpa’s fascia is decided.
5. Pedicle division and transfer. If the calibre of the SCIP artery is too small for a safe anastomosis in the hand of the operating surgeon, the main trunk of the SCIA can be taken at its origin from the femoral artery. By doing this the pedicle can be lengthened to a limited extent.
6. Donor site closure. We do not tend to insert drains on the donor site for this ap unless a very large ap has been taken with signicant undermining of the abdominal wall.
Fig. 34.7 The donor site is closed in layers and a suction drain is placed
34.6 Core Surgical Techniques inFlap Dissection
1. Incision over SCIP pedicle. The use of a West self-
retaining retractor provides adequate retraction, easing sharp dissection. No assistant is needed for raising this ap.
2. Pedicle dissection. Debakey forceps and tenotomy scis-
sors are our preferred instruments for pedicle dissection, along with bipolar diathermy. Vessel Loops can be used
34.7 Clinical Scenario
Case Scenario 1 Surgeon TC Teo A 46-year-old female underwent an excision of a painful leiomyoma on her left upper arm. A 14× 25cm defect was created that required reconstruction with a large supercial circumex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) ap. The anterograde raising of this ap is shown, rst incising over its pedicle to identify the SCIP ves­sels to then subsequently complete the whole raising of the skin paddle. The ap was then inset in the defect while and the donor site was closed directly. Patient presented an uneventful recovery. (Figs.34.8, 34.9, 34.10, and 34.11).
Fig. 34.8 Medial approach to the pedicle of SCIP
34 Supercial Circumex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap: AThin andVersatile Option forLimb andHead andNeck Reconstruction
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
329
Fig. 34.9 Large 19 by 25 cm SCIP ap raised to reconstruct Leiomyoma defect
Fig. 34.10 Tensionless donor site closure after large SCIP ap
Fig. 34.12 Patient with signicant wrist exion contracture secondary
to Volkmann’s contracture
Fig. 34.13 Wrist contracture released with resultant defect with exposed exor tendons. Radial vessels dissected as recipient vessels for SCIP ap
wrist in to a more functional position, an extensive scar release was performed, including exor tendon lengthening and a proximal row carpectomy. The resulting defect was resurfaced with a 15×7 SCIP ap anastomosed end to side to the radial artery and end to end to the Venae Comitans. The intraopera­tive photographs showing the preparation of the radial vessels, raising of the SCIP pedicle, inset and postoperative results are shown (Figs.34.12, 34.13, 34.14, 34.15, and 34.16).
Case Scenario 3 Surgeon TC Teo A 49- year- old man sus­tained a Gustilo 3B open tibial fracture after a motor vehicle accident, an external xator frame was placed after initial debridement by the orthopaedic team. An SCIP ap was
Fig. 34.11 Leiomyoma defect closed with SCIP ap
designed to reconstruct the defect. The ap resurfaced the defect, and anastomosis was made end to side to the poste-
Case Scenario 2 Surgeon TC Teo and D Nikkhah A
37-year- old man was referred to our unit for a long-standing left forearm and hand Volksmann contracture, following a missed compartment syndrome years ago. In order to get his
rior tibial artery and end to end to the associated venae com­mitans. The patient made a full recovery, with bony union and a healed reconstruction without any long- term sequelae (Figs.34.17, 34.18, 34.19, and 34.20).
330
Fig. 34.14 Medial approach to SCIP with vessels identied under Scarpa’s fascia
J. E. Berner et al.
Fig. 34.15 SCIP inset over soft tissue defect at wrist at end of case
Fig. 34.16 Result at 6months
Fig. 34.17 Open tibial fracture in middle third of lower extremity
34 Supercial Circumex Iliac Artery Perforator Flap: AThin andVersatile Option forLimb andHead andNeck Reconstruction
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
34.8 Pearls andPitfalls
Pearls
• Place skin paddle over inguinal ligament, incorpo­rating non- hair-bearing skin if possible.
• An incision over the SCIP pedicle allows visualis­ing its calibre and length before committing to rais­ing the whole ap. In rare occasions, raising can be abandoned and a contralateral SCIP or SIEA ap raised.
• There are multiple supercial veins running in the groin region. This should always be included in the ap if possible. These supercial veins tend to have a larger calibre than the SCIP vena comitans and are
Fig. 34.18 SCIP ap raised and templated for lower limb defect
particularly useful in small aps to reduce the chances of venous congestion.
• If the calibre of the SCIP artery is inadequate for safe anastomosis, a segment of the larger SCIA can be harvested.
• Avoid undermining of the abdomen prior to closure to avoid contour deformities or pulling on the umbilicus.
331
Fig. 34.19 End to side anastomosis onto the PTA and end to end anas­tomosis onto venae comitans
Pitfalls
• SCIP ap dissection is mostly supercial and there­fore raising can be quick in experienced hands. It is an excellent choice when there are recipient vessels in the wound or just next to it. If a longer pedicle is required, another alternative should be sought.
• Small aps are prone to venous congestion. Incorporating a supercial vein with the ap can solve this problem.
• It is important to have in mind that the SCIP pedicle runs through supercial groin lymph nodes. Careful dissection is key to minimise the risk of seroma and lymphoedema.
• Surgeons raising this ap should be prepared to work with vessels of 0.8–1mm calibre. Often it is necessary to perform an end to side anastomosis in extremity reconstruction due to the signicant ves­sel mismatch.
• The artery in the SCIP ap is often smaller than the vein, it can be simple to confuse the two, and it is best to mark the vein with blue ink or place a micro­surgical clamp over it to help distinguish the two structures.
Fig. 34.20 Final result at end of case
332
J. E. Berner et al.
34.9 Selected Readings
• Pereira N, Parada L, Kufeke M, Troncoso E, Roa R.A new planning method to easily harvest the supercial cir­cumex iliac artery perforator ap. J Reconstruct Microsurg. 2020 Mar;36(03):165–70.
This recent article presents an anatomy-based planning
strategy using CT-angiography which can be useful for surgeons familiarising with the SCIP ap
• Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y, Urushibara K, Inagawa K, Hamasaki T, Moriguchi T.Supercial cir­cumex iliac artery perforator ap for reconstruction of limb defects. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2004 Jan 1;113(1):233–40.
Inceptional article by Prof. Koshima, being the rst pub-
lication to present the use of this ap in the literature.
• Goh TL, Park SW, Cho JY, Choi JW, Hong JP.The search for the ideal thin skin ap: supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap—a review of 210 cases. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015 Feb 1;135(2):592–601.
Largest case series of SCIP aps to date, demonstrating
its reliability for limb reconstruction as super-thin ap. The authors describe the lateral to medial approach of SCIP ap elevation.
• Berner JE, Nikkhah D, Zhao J, Prousskaia E, Teo TC.The versatility of the supercial circumex iliac artery perfo­rator ap: a single surgeon’s 16-year experience for limb reconstruction and a systematic review. J Reconstruct Microsurg. 2020 Feb;36(02):093–103.
Largest case series in Western population. The SCIP clas-
sication based on the included tissues is presented along with a description of the anterograde raising technique.
References
1. Koshima I, Nanba Y, Tsutsui T, Takahashi Y, Urushibara K, Inagawa K, Hamasaki T, Moriguchi T. Supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap for reconstruction of limb defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113:233. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.
PRS.0000095948.03605.20.
2. McGregor IA, Jackson IT.The Groin Flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007- 1226(72)80003- 1.
3. Pereira N, Cámbara Á, Kufeke M, Roa R.Post-traumatic lymph­edema treatment with supercial circumex iliac artery perfora­tor lymphatic free ap: a case report. Microsurgery. 2019;39:354.
https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30437.
4. Pan ZH, Jiang PP, Zhao YX, Wang JL. Treatment of complex metacarpal defects with free chimeric iliac Osteocutaneous aps. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2017;51:143. https://doi.org/10.1080/200
0656X.2016.1205502.
5. Goh TL, Park SW, Cho JY, Choi JW, Hong JP.The search for the ideal thin skin ap: supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap--a review of 210 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; https://doi.
org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000951.
6. Berner JE, Nikkhah D, Zhao J, Prousskaia E, Teo TC. The ver­satility of the supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap: a single Surgeon’s 16-year experience for limb reconstruction and a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36:93. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0039- 1695051.
7. Green R, Rahman KM, Owen S, Paleri V, Adams J, Ahmed OA, Ragbir M.The supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap in intra-Oral reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.07.011.
8. Yoshimatsu H, Steinbacher J, Meng S, Hamscha UM, Weninger WJ, Tinhofer IE, Harima M, Fuse Y, Yamamoto T, Tzou CHJ.Supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap: an anatomical study of the correlation of the supercial and the deep branches of the artery and evaluation of perfusion from the deep branch to the Sartorius muscle and the iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:589.
9. Gentileschi S, Servillo M, De Bonis F, et al. Radioanatomical study of the pedicle of the supercial circumex iliac per­forator ap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019;35:669. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0039- 1693144.
10. Suh HS, Jeong HH, Choi DH, Hong JP.Study of the medial super­cial perforator of the supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap using computed tomographic angiography and surgical anat­omy in 142 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:738. https://
doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003147.
11. Pereira N, Parada L, Kufeke M, Troncoso E, Roa R.A new plan­ning method to easily harvest the supercial circumex iliac artery perforator ap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36:165. https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0039- 1698444.
12. Pereira N, Kufeke M, Parada L, Troncoso E, Bahamondes J, Sanchez L, Roa R. Augmented reality microsurgical planning with a smartphone (ARM-PS): a dissection route map in your pocket. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72:759. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.023.
13. Hong JP, Choi DH, Suh H, Mukarramah DA, Tashti T, Lee K, Yoon C.A new plane of elevation: the supercial fascial plane for perforator ap elevation. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014; https://doi.
org/10.1055/s- 0034- 1369807.
Lateral Circumflex Femoral Artery—
Данная книга находится в списке для перевода на русский язык сайта https://meduniver.com/
Anterolateral Thigh Flap: Anterolateral Thigh Flap
RobertMiller, DariushNikkhah, EdmundFitzgeraldO’Connor, andJeremyRawlins
35
35.1 Introduction
First published by Song in 1984, the anterolateral thigh (ALT) ap is one of the key perforator-based workhorse aps for regional or free tissue transfer reconstruction [1, 2]. Since its inception, it has been extensively described for reconstruction of defects across the body. Together with consistently high ap success, minimal donor site morbidity and the ability to use a two-team approach, this is a key ap in the reconstructive surgeon’s armament.
Based on work in the late twentieth century on septocutane­ous vessels, Song’s original paper described three thigh aps (anteriolateral, anteriomedial and posterior). They described a ap thickness between 1 and 3cm, with a total area of 800cm [2] that could be neurotised [1]. Since then, the ALT ap has evolved to provide muscle, fascia and skin tissue components in various combinations, as well as use as a ow-through or chi­meric ap. Furthermore, by limiting the ap width dimension, primary closure of the donor site can be achieved, reducing the donor site morbidity and improving cosmesis.
Most commonly, the ALT is raised as a free ap for head and neck and lower limb reconstruction. However, it can also be used as a pedicled ap, most commonly for lower abdom­inal wall, groin and perineal reconstruction.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at [https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3- 031- 07678- 7_35].
R. Miller Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St George’s Hospital, London, UK
D. Nikkhah (*) Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK e-mail: d.nikkhah@nhs.net
E. F. OConnor Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
J. Rawlins Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 D. Nikkhah et al. (eds.), Core Techniques in Flap Reconstructive Microsurgery, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07678-7_35
35.2 Anatomy
The ALT ap is centred at the mid-point of a line drawn between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) superiorly and the superior lateral aspect of the patella inferiorly. The arterial supply is derived from the lateral circumex femoral artery (LCFA) which arises proximally from the profunda femoris artery and runs deep to the rectus femoris (RF) and sartorius. The LCFA divides into the ascending, transverse and descending branches, which most commonly follow an intramuscular course (87% musculocutaneous vs. 13% sep­tocutaneous [3]) to supply the subcutaneous tissue and skin of the thigh. This is contrary to Song’s original description of predominantly septocutaneous vessels [1].
The ALT ap is most commonly based on perforators from the descending branch. However, other perforator pat­terns have been described [4]. The descending branch travels along the medial edge of the vastus lateralis (VL) in the intra-muscular septum between VL and RF, giving off perfo­rators within a 3 cm radius of the mid-point between the ASIS– superior lateral patella. In a minority of patients, the descending branch divides into medial and lateral branches at this mid-point, with the lateral branch providing perfora­tors to the lateral thigh. Septocutaneous perforators travel between the RF and VL, traversing the fascia to supply the skin, while musculocutaneous perforators course through the VL for approximately 3–5cm, before exiting the fascia to supply the overlying skin [2]. Studies examining the vascular territories of the thigh aps have demonstrated that linking vessels and recurrent ow from the subdermal plexus facili­tate perfusion between perforator zones. This allows an unthinned extended ALT to be raised on a single perforator [5]. Venous drainage most commonly comes from two venae comitantes running with the arterial pedicle, which go onto drain into the femoral vein.
Sensory innervation comes from the lateral femoral cutane­ous nerve, which passes under the inguinal ligament just medial to the ASIS and travels under the tensor fascia lata, before piercing it. Motor innervation to the VL is derived from
333