Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_6013_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
87 Мб
Скачать
106    Procedure 12| Cervical Spine: Lateral Mass Screw Fixation
S T E P 4 P EA R L S
• In extended and complex instrumented fusions, additional stability can be achieved by linking cross connectors to the longitudinal rods.
• In patients with poor bone quality unsuitable for placement of lateral mass screws, sublaminar wires can be secured to open cable connectors attached to the rods for additional fixation.
S T E P 4 P IT FA L L S
• Titanium rods should not be contoured multiple times, because fatigue may occur to the rod.
• A cross connector should be carefully placed in a dorsal location following a laminectomy to avoid posterior dural impingement.
FIGURE 12-9 
S T E P 4
I N S T RU M E N T A T I O N /
I M P L AN TAT IO N
• Polyaxial screw and rod system, reduction tools
5 mm
FIGURE 12-10 
Step 5:  Placement of Screw Caps
n
Screw tightening (once the inner nut is placed in the polyaxial screw head)
should be performed in a gentle and systematic fashion to facilitate rod seating, allow controlled manipulation of the spinal segments, and to avoid screw torque, which may result in screw loosening (Figure 12-9).
n
Final nut tightening is performed utilizing the torque driver and antitorque
device to guarantee optimal tightening of the nuts and to avoid late rod loosening.

Postoperative Care and Expected Outcomes

n
Depending on the length and extent of the entire surgical procedure, the pathol-
ogy, and bone quality, the required postoperative care may differ significantly (Figure 12-10).
Procedure 12  | Cervical Spine: Lateral Mass Screw Fixation    107
n
Patients are routinely monitored in the hospital overnight.
n
A soft collar orthosis may be used in the setting of short segment reconstruc-
tions in degenerative disease. A hard collar is may be applied in the postopera­tive period for approximately 6 weeks, depending upon the pathology and length of the instrumented construct. Rigid external fixation with a halo-vest orthosis is rarely indicated, except in severe osteoporosis, questionable compli­ance, neoplasms, and certain traumatic lesions.
n
Deep or superficial wound infections should be addressed at an early stage.
Extensive infections may require hardware removal and rigid external immobilization.
n
Postoperative neurologic deterioration resulting from hardware malpositioning
requires hardware revision or removal.
n
Failure of bony fusion may result in instrumentation failure, necessitating hard-
ware revision.

Evidence

Bayley E, Zia Z,  Kerslake  R,  Klezl Z, Boszczyk BM. Lamina-guided  lateral mass 
screw placement in the  sub-axial  cervical  spine. Eur Spine J 2010;19:660-4.
Results of this study indicate that using the subaxial cervical lamina as a reference plane for the insertion of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine decreases the likelihood of vertebral injury.
Deen GH, Birch BD,  Wharen  RE,  Reimer R. Lateral mass screw-rod  fixation of  the 
cervical spine: a prospective  clinical  series  with 1-year follow-up. Spine J  2003;3:489-95.
These data indicate that posterior cervical stabilization with polyaxial screw–rod fixation is a safe, straightforward technique that appears to offer some advantages over existing methods of fixation.
Merrola AA, Castro BA,  Alongi  PR.  Anatomic consideration for standard and 
modified techniques of cervical  lateral  mass  screw placement. Spine J  2002;2:430-5.
This study indicates that there are significant differences in potential neurovascular injury, which are dependent on the technique used for screw entry, the level instrumented, and the angle of screw trajectory in the parasagittal plane.
Wang MY, Levi AD. Minimally invasive  lateral mass  screw fixation in the cervical 
spine; initial clinical experience  with  long-term  follow-up. Neurosurgery  2006;58:907-12.
The results of this study indicate that the minimally invasive approach preserves the integrity of the components that provide stability to the cervical spine.
Xu R, Haman SP, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting RA. The anatomic relation of lateral  mass 
screws to the spinal  nerves:  a  comparison of the Magerl, Anderson,  and An  techniques. Spine 1999;24:2057-61.
The results of this study indicate that the potential risk of nerve root violation is higher with the Magerl and Anderson techniques than with the An technique.
P R O C ED U R E 1 3
Cervical Pedicle
Screw Fixation
Kuniyoshi Abumi, Manabu Ito, and Yoshihiro Hojo

Overview

n
Despite increasing acceptance of the use of pedicle screws in the lumbar and
thoracic spine, screw insertion into the cervical pedicle has been considered by spine surgeons to be too risky for the neurovascular structures, except at C2 and C7. Leconte first reported C2 pedicle screw insertion for osteosynthesis of the C2 hangman’s fracture. In the late 1980s, Goel and Laheri started to use C2 pedicle screws for atlantoaxial plate fixation in combination with C1 lateral mass screws. However, there had been no reports of pedicle screw fixation from C3 to C6 until the 1994 report by Abumi and colleagues of pedicle screw fixa­tion for traumatic lesions of the lower cervical spine. Biomechanical studies revealed the superior stabilizing effect of pedicle screw fixation compared with other internal fixation procedures used with the cervical spine, including lateral mass screw fixation. In their recent experimental study, Johnston and colleagues revealed the superior pullout strength of a cervical pedicle screw versus a lateral mass screw after repetitive loading. Dunlop and colleagues demonstrated, by an in-vitro biomechanical study, that cervical pedicle screw/rod constructs support a greater axial load than lateral mass screw/rod constructs.
n
The pedicle screw fixation procedure allows rigid fixation that provides the high
correction capability needed to restore physiologic sagittal alignment of the cervical spine, as well as sufficient correction of malalignment in the occipitoato­lantoaxial region. In addition, the pedicle screw fixation procedure, which does not require use of the lamina for stabilization, is quite valuable in patients who undergo one-stage posterior cervical decompression and stabilization, and in patients who undergo posterior reconstruction after previous posterior cervical decompression. On the other hand, the risks of neurovascular complications caused by inadequate screw placement into the cervical pedicle cannot be completely obviated. Thorough knowledge of local anatomy, sufficient preopera­tive radiologic examinations, and the application of established surgical tech­niques are essential for this procedure.

Indications

n
Almost all the pathologic conditions requiring posterior stabilization of the
occipitocervical junction, cervical spine, or cervicothoracic junction.
n
Most middle and lower cervical injuries with posterior disruption, or anterior
and posterior disruption without a severely disrupted anterior column, can be managed by posterior surgery using cervical pedicle screw fixation alone.
I N D I CAT I O NS P I T F A L L S
• Infectious disorders at the posterior portion of the cervical spine are contraindications for pedicle screw fixation.
• Pedicles destroyed by injuries, tumors, rheumatoid arthritis
• Marked osteoporosis
• Extremely small pedicles
• Pedicles of the vertebra associated with major anomalies of the vertebral artery, and so forth, are inadequate and risky for screw insertion (Figures 13-1 and
13-2).
Figure 13-1 shows an abnormal
condition of the cervical pedicle. Pedicles destroyed by injuries, tumors, or marked osteoporosis; extremely small pedicles; pedicles of the vertebrae associated with major anomalies of the vertebral artery, and so forth, are inadequate and risky for screw insertion. Figure 13-1, A shows a fracture of the pedicle in a patient with a lateral mass fracture. Figure 13-2, B shows a pedicle of an extremely small size in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis.
Figure 13-2 shows a small size of the
pedicle of the axis. Figure 13-2, A shows that the diameter of right side of the pedicle of the axis is too small for screw insertion by high-riding vertebral artery bends into the lateral mass of the axis (arrow). Figure 13-2, B shows extremely small pedicles of the axis for screw insertion.
Procedure 13  | Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation    109
A
VA
B
FIGURE 13-1, A-B 
A
FIGURE 13-2, A-B 
B
110    Procedure 13| Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation
n
• Patients sometimes have extreme unilateral dominance of the vertebral artery. In this condition, the dominant­side foramen transversarium enlarges, and the ipsilateral side of the pedicle decreases in size (Figure 13-3). Retrogression of the pedicle is found on the side of the dominant vertebral artery. Figure 13-3, A shows that patients sometimes show extreme right-left dominance of the vertebral artery. Figure 13-3, B shows that the dominant side of the foramen transversarium enlarges and that the ipsilateral side of the pedicle decreases in size (white arrow).
• For the patient with unilateral obstruction of the vertebral artery by injury, tumor, congenital anomaly, and so forth, screw insertion on the preserved artery side must be conducted with great care, or screw insertion should only be performed on the obstructed side.
Cervical spinal instability caused by nontraumatic lesions, including meta-
static tumor, rheumatoid arthritis, destructive spondyloarthropathy, cervical intervention for posterior decompression of the spinal cord or nerve root, and so forth, are well managed by this procedure.
n
Cervical kyphosis caused by many causes, including postlaminectomy and post-
traumatic kyphosis, cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with kyphosis, and so forth, can be corrected sufficiently by this procedure.
n
A degenerative cervical spine with segmental instability requiring posterior
decompression also can be managed by simultaneous decompression and sta­bilization using pedicle screw fixation.
n
This procedure is beneficial for stabilization of the unstable motion segment
caused by extensive decompression of the nerve root or spinal cord, affecting stability of the facet joint.
n
Salvage of pseudarthrosis of anterior fusion.
n
Fusion-level elongation for adjacent segment degeneration after anterior or
posterior fusion surgery.
A
B
FIGURE 13-3, A-B 
Procedure 13  | Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation    111

Examination/Imaging

n
Preoperative oblique-projection plain radiograph films are valuable for evalua-
tion of the pedicle size. In an oblique projection, the contralateral pedicle is seen as an oval projected onto the vertebral body, showing the outer and inner diameter of the pedicle. If the projection shows no inner diameter, the pedicle does not have a medullary canal.
n
Computerized tomography (CT) evaluations (adjusted to the bone windows) are
essential to assess the pedicle morphometry and to determine pedicle size, which allows surgeons to choose the appropriate pedicle screw diameter, length, direction in the coronal plane, and screw insertion point. Reconstructive CT in the oblique plane provides useful information about the size of the neural foramen.
n
Preoperative evaluation of the morphology of the vertebral artery is important
in preventing serious complications involving the artery.
• Duan and colleagues demonstrated, in an imaging anatomic study, that the incidence of abnormal course of the vertebral artery is high at the craniover­tebral junction.
• The incidence of ischemic brain complications caused by unilateral obstruction of the vertebral artery is low.
However, if the dominant vertebral artery is injured, serious neurologic
complications can occur.
• CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide information regarding right-left dominance and anatomic variations of the vertebral artery. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) must be conducted for patients with evidence of the abnormalities or in whom these abnormalities are suspected.

Surgical Anatomy

n
According to previous studies by Panjabi and colleagues and by Karaikovic and
colleagues, the pedicle of the cervical spine in a normal population has a suf­ficient diameter to allow insertion of a screw with a diameter of 3.5 mm or more.
• These authors defined this quantitatively by measuring the cadaveric cervical spine. Both the outer width and outer height were largest at C2 and smallest at C3, with subsequent increasing size if progressing to C7.
• Pedicles in some patients have a diameter that is too small to allow screw insertion.
n
According to an anatomic study by Reinhold and colleagues, the average overall
angle between the sagittal plane and the longitudinal pedicle axis was 46 degrees, varying from 30 degrees to 62 degrees. The smallest angle was at C7, the largest at C4. Their results were similar to previous studies by Karaikovic and colleagues.
n
Pedicle screw insertion into a vertebra with an extremely large angle between
the pedicle axis and the sagittal plane may be possible but puts the vertebral artery and the spinal cord at risk. Figure 13-4 shows an extremely large angle between the pedicle axis and the sagittal plane. The left side of the foramen transversarium is enlarged toward the vertebral body (Figure 13-4, A,
arrow
), and the angle between the pedicle axis (
black line
) and the sagittal plane is extremely large because of deformation of the foramen. In a case of C6 spondylolysis, the angle between the pedicle axis (Figure 13-4, B, and the sagittal plane is extremely large. Screw insertion into the left side of the pedicle is too risky for the vertebral artery and the spinal cord.
n
Karaikovic and colleagues defined the inner morphology of the cervical pedicles.
They revealed that the thinnest pedicle cortex was always the lateral cortex, and some pedicles had no medullary canal (i.e., where solid cortical bone is expected:
0.9% for C2, 2.8% for C3 and C4, and 3.8% for C5 pedicles).
open
black line
)
112    Procedure 13| Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation
C5
A
FIGURE 13-4, A-B 
70°
C6
60°
Lt
B
70°
Lt
A
FIGURE 13-5, A-C 
B
C
n
The vertebral artery sometimes bends into the vertebral body forming the loop,
and screw insertion into the ipsilateral side of the pedicle may put the artery at risk. Figure 13-5 shows loop formation of the vertebral artery.
n
MRA shows the medial loop of the left vertebral artery (Figure 13-5, A,
n
CT (Figure 13-5, B) and MRI (Figure 13-5, C ) images show that the vertebral
artery bends into the vertebral body, forming the loop (
arrows
). Screw insertion
arrow
into the left side of the pedicle is too risky for the artery.
).
Procedure 13  | Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation    113
Anesthesiologist
Surgeon
Nurse
FIGURE 13-6 
C-arm monitorAssistant surgeon

Positioning

n
The authors prefer to stand at the head of the patient, to ensure symmetric
insertion of the right and left screws, while the assistant for a right-handed surgeon usually stands on the left side of the patient.
n
The C-arm display is placed on the left side of the patient near the patient’s
pelvis for easy viewing by the surgeon. The authors’ preferred operation room setup for posterior cervical spinal procedures is shown in Figure 13-6.
n
The patient is placed prone on a Relton-Hall frame, using a horseshoe-type
headrest or a Mayfield headholder.
n
The shoulders are pulled caudally using heavy bandage for intraoperative lateral
fluoroscopic imaging of the lower cervical spine.

Portals/Exposures

n
A skin incision is made, usually longer than that required for a standard spinous
process wiring. The cephalad adjacent lamina of the most cephalad-fixed ver­tebra should entirely be exposed, taking care to protect the surrounding facet joint capsule. The paravertebral muscles are dissected laterally to expose the lateral margins of the articular masses for exact mediolateral determination of the screw insertion point.

Procedure

Step 1:  Manual Screw Placement
n
The cranial margin of the C2 lamina is the craniocaudal landmark for the screw
insertion point for C2. To confirm the screw insertion points in C2, a small spatula can be inserted into the spinal canal along the cranial margin of the C2 lamina to the medial surface of the C2 pedicle. Figure 13-7 shows the pedicle screw insertion point for C2. The cranial margin of the C2 lamina (white broken line) is the landmark for the screw insertion point for C2 (asterisk). To confirm the screw insertion points in C2, a small spatula can be inserted into the spinal canal along the margin cortex of the C2 pars interarticularis to the medial surface of the C2 pedicle. The black broken arrow indicates the screw direction toward the C2 pedicle.
n
The angle for the C2 pedicle should be 15 to 25 degrees medial to the midline
in the transverse plane.
114    Procedure 13| Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation
FIGURE 13-7 
15°-25°
C1
C2
VA
*
FIGURE 13-8 
n
The screw insertion points for the C3 to C7 pedicles are slightly lateral to the
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
center of the articular mass and close to the inferior margin of the inferior articular process of the cranially adjacent vertebra. However, the shape and size of the lateral mass are variable in each vertebra and in each patient.
n
The lateral margin of the articular mass of the cervical spine has a notch
approximately at the level of the pedicle. The pedicles are located approximately below the lateral vertebral notch at C2, at the notch at C3 through C6, and at or slightly above the notch at C7. Figure 13-8 shows the pedicle screw insertion points for C3 to C7. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction shows the screw insertion points for C3 to C7. The lateral margin of the articular mass of the cervical spine has a notch approximately at the level of the pedicle (
white arrow
The pedicles are located approximately below the lateral vertebral notch at C2, at C3 to C6, and at or slightly above the notch at C7. Screw insertion points (
black crosses
) are 2 to 4 mm medial to the notch. The
white asterisk
the C2 pedicle screw insertion point.
• The screw insertion points for the C3 to C7 pedicles are slightly laterally to the center of the articular mass and close to the inferior margin of the inferior articular process of the cranially adjacent vertebra. Craniocaudal orientation of the screw insertion point can be confirmed by a lateral image intensifier.
• The anatomic direction of the pedicle axis in the transverse plane varies from a minimum for the C7 pedicle to a maximum for the C5 pedicle.
• Pedicle screw insertion with a large angle relative to the sagittal plane can be difficult. Because of short length of cervical pedicle axis, however, the screw can be inserted at a smaller angle than the angle of the anatomic axis.
• The authors usually insert screws at an angle of 25 degrees to 45 degrees relative to the sagittal plane for the pedicles from C3 to C7.
).
shows
Procedure 13  | Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation    115
C6
FIGURE 13-9 
• By making the funnel-shaped hole bigger and deeper with a curette or high­speed burr, the surgeon can see the medial cortex of the posterior portion of the pedicle and the pedicle cavity directly in most cases. This funnel-shaped resection of the outer portion of the articular mass toward the entrance of the pedicle cavity allows more freedom and potential angulation for position­ing the screw. Figure 13-9 shows the starting point and direction of the cervi­cal pedicle screw. The authors usually create a funnel-shaped hole at the screw insertion point using a high-speed burr. The
two dashed black lines
indicate the anatomic axis of the pedicle. The semicircular shaded area denotes the excised outer portion of the articular mass. Through funnel­shaped resection of the articular mass toward the entrance of the pedicle cavity using a high speed burr, the starting point of the screw approaches the entrance of the pedicle cavity. Consequently, the surgeon obtains more freedom with the screw insertion angle. The triangular area between the two black lines indicates the possible screw insertion direction.
• In addition, the surgeon can see the pedicle cavity directly, in many cases, by enlarging the insertion hole with a curette or high-speed burr.
• After creating the insertion hole, a small pedicle probe, tap, and screws are inserted into the pedicle with the help of a lateral image intensifier, to confirm the direction and insertion depth. The authors recommend confirming the proper creation of the screw insertion path after probing and tapping, using a pedicle sounder. Screw insertion is regulated using a C-arm. The
white lines
indicate the cranial and caudal margins of the pedicle (Figure
two dashed
13-10). The pedicle probe, tap, and screws must be advanced between the
two lines. Figure 13-10, A shows the making of a funnel-shaped hole. Figure
13-10, B shows the probing of the pedicle, and Figure 13-10, C shows the
tapping of the pedicle. Screw insertion is shown in Figure 13-10, D.
• Yukawa and colleagues demonstrated that the use of oblique projection fluo­roscopy imaging increased the rate of proper screw insertion.
n
The thinnest pedicle cortex is always the lateral cortex. Therefore the surgeon
should keep this in mind while probing and tapping the pedicle and while placing the screws.
n
The medial pedicle cortex must be used as a safe guide for the insertion of the
screw into the vertebral body through the pedicle isthmus.