Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5181_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
50
Fig. 3.10 Sagittal and Axial T2 MRI cuts demonstrating a central lumbar disc protrusion
A. J. Khanna and B. Gelfand
joints, and more will enhance a surgeon’s ability to identify pathologic conditions.
The spine is generally composed of 7 cervical vertebrae, 12 thoracic vertebrae, 5 lumbar verte­brae, the sacrum, and the coccyx. The vertebral bodies are separated by intervertebral discs, while the facet joints provide articulations of adjacent vertebrae. Fibrous joints, including the ligamentum avum, interspinous ligaments, and supraspinous ligaments provide anatomic con­nections spanning the entire spine.
Disc Herniations represent one of the most common spinal pathologies seen by orthopedic surgeons. Components of the intervertebral disc include the annulus pulposus (outer annulus) and nucleus pulposus (inner annulus). On MRI, discs show intermediate signal on T1 weighted images and high signal on T2 images. The nucleus pulp­osus, when compared to normal vertebral mar­row, appears hyperintense on T2 and hypointense on T1 weighted images. Over time, as patients age and the disc degenerates, T2 signal decreases within the nucleus pulposus and the disc appears dark on all sequences.
When evaluating a sagittal and axial T2 MRI of the spine, analyzing the posterior aspect of the intervertebral disc will demonstrate any her­niation or sequestration as well as any other pathology that could be causing nerve root com­pression (Fig.3.10).

Bone Scan

In contrast to radiographs, CT and MRI which provide information about the anatomic nature of the structure in question, nuclear scintigraphy or bone scan, provides physiologic information. Bone scan, or more specically three-phase bone scintigraphy, is a form of nuclear imaging which demonstrates bone turnover.
The fundamentals of acquiring bone scans are based on tissue uptake of radiopharmaceutical agents. When a patient is injected with an agent that emits gamma rays, such as Technetium-99m phosphate, the distribution of the rays can be cap­tured by a gamma (scintillation) camera. The gamma cameras are designed to scan large areas of the body and can rotate to collect from multi­ple sites of the body. Technetium-99m is the most common radioisotope used given that it is inex­pensive, has a half-life of approximately 6h and its photon energy is easily captured by gamma cameras.
The typical bone scan occurs in a “three­phase” manner: Blood ow phase, soft tissue phase, and delayed/bone phase. Increased uptake is seen in the blood ow phase in areas of mature blood vessels, the soft tissue phase shows increased vascularity in the setting of acute inammation and bone phase demonstrates sites of bone turnover.
3 Musculoskeletal Imaging
51
Specic to bone scans, 99m Tc-Methylene diphosphonate (MDP) is often injected as this isotope is sensitive for bony abnormalities. The amount of MDP uptake is based on the osteoblas­tic activity and vascular nature of bone. Thus, bone scans help provide physiologic information of bone relatively diffusely across the body at the expense of specicity as well as poor spatial and anatomic resolution.
Clinically, bone scan is most useful for evalu­ating metastatic disease, malignant tumors, meta­bolic disease, osteomyelitis, as well as stress fractures.
With regard to osteomyelitis, bone scan is a use­ful tool to help aid in diagnosis especially within the acute form of the infection. Within the rst 24h of infection, radiotracer uptake is generally increased at the site of osteomyelitis. Often, con­ventional radiographs are unable to detect bony changes early in the infectious course thus proving the usefulness of bone scan. Building off these principles, bone scan is also useful to help differen­tiate osteomyelitis from another entity like celluli­tis or septic arthritis. Increased uptake is seen in all three phases in osteomyelitis compared to increased uptake in the blood ow and soft tissue phase in cellulitis. When compared to MRI, bone scan offers the advantage in that it is able to detect mul­tiple sites of infection compared to the anatomic region scanned during a MRI. This is especially useful in a pediatric patient whose age makes clini­cal history difcult to obtain while there is a clini­cal concern for multiple areas of osteomyelitis.
In the setting of metastatic disease, signicant bony destruction must occur before conventional radiographs can detect changes thus demonstrat­ing the importance of bone scan in diagnosing disease in the early stages. Although this is a gen­eral principle, orthopedic surgeons must be wary as multiple myeloma and purely osteolytic tumors may not produce increased uptake and be viewed as a false negative.
Compared to metastatic disease, bone scan has less use in the setting of primary bone tumors. Although uptake is seen, the area may not be accurate with regard to margins and the amount of soft tissue involvement or extension. Additionally, uptake seen on bone scans cannot distinguish
between malignant and benign lesions. Overall, bone scan proves more effective in excluding multifocal disease or metastatic disease opposed to analyzing primary solitary lesions.
The nonspecic nature of uptake seen on bone scans can pose a challenge when interpreting scans in the setting of trauma or persistent pain. Both bony trauma and degenerative osteoarthritis will appear as areas of focal increased uptake. Generally, uptake reaches its peak approximately 7days after a fracture with return to normal up to 1year after the initial injury. Stress fractures will demonstrate increased focal uptake.

PET Scan

Positron emission tomography (PET) scan is another modality used to assess the physiologic activity in tissues with the use of glucose metabo­lism. In contrast to bone scans, in a PET scan, patients are injected with 18-F-labeled 2-uoro­2-deoxyglucose, which is a marker of glucose metabolism when emitted.
Clinically, PET Scans are most often used in the setting of evaluation of metastatic disease as well as tumor recurrence. Studies have demon­strated increased sensitivity and specicity for differentiating malignant and benign lesions.
In the arthroplasty setting, PET scans have become useful in determining if a patient’s pain surrounding an implant is secondary to aseptic loosening as opposed to an indolent infection. It can be difcult to diagnose a chronic pros­thetic joint infection if laboratory data is equiv­ocal, thus proving another role for the use of PET scan.
Overall, PET scan is an important diagnostic tool when rst line imaging does not yield enough information and a test all orthopedic surgeons should be familiar with.

Further Reading

Domb BG, Tyler W, Ellis S, McCarthy E.Radiographic
evaluation of pathological bone lesions: current spec-
trum of disease and approach to diagnosis. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(Suppl 2):84–90.
52
A. J. Khanna and B. Gelfand
Grissom L, Harcke HT, Thacker M.Imaging in the surgi-
cal management of developmental dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(4):791–801.
Sanders TG, Miller MD.A systematic approach to mag-
netic resonance imaging interpretation of sports medicine injuries of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(1):131–48.
Sanders TG, Morrison WB, Miller MD. Imaging tech-
niques for the evaluation of glenohumeral instability. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(3):414–34.
Shindle MK, Foo LF, Kelly BT, etal. Magnetic resonance
imaging of cartilage in the athlete: current techniques and spectrum of disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):27–46.
Court-Brown CM, Tornetta P, McQueen MM, Ricci WM,
editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2019.
Fayad LM, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK.Musculoskeletal
imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: when is computed tomogra­phy the study of choice? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2005;34:220–37.
Genant HK, Wilson JS, Bovill EG, Brunelle FO, Murray
WR, Rodrigo JJ. Computed tomography of the musculoskeletal system. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62:1088–101.
Lee E, Worsley DF. Role of radionuclide imaging in
the orthopedic patient. Orthop Clin North Am.
2006;37:485–501. Abdel-Dayem HM.The role of nuclear medicine in pri-
mary bone and soft tissue tumors. Semin Nucl Med.
1997;27:355–63. Alazraki NP. Radionuclide imaging in the evaluation of
infections and inammatory disease. Radiol Clin
North Am. 1993;31:783–94. Santiago Restrepo C, Giménez CR, McCarthy K.Imaging
of osteomyelitis and musculoskeletal soft tissue infec-
tions: current concepts. Rheum Dis Clin N Am.
2003;29:89–109. Delank KS, Schmidt M, Michael JWP, Dietlein M,
Schicha H, Eysel P. The implications of 18F-FDG
PET for the diagnosis of endoprosthetic loosening and
infection in hip and knee arthroplasty: results from
a prospective, blinded study. BMC Musculoskelet
Disord. 2006;7:20–8. Wilson JS, Korobkin M, Genant HK, Bovill EG Jr.
Computed tomography musculoskeletal disorders.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1978;131:55–61. Morgan S, Saifuddin A.MRI of the lumbar intervertebral
disc. Clin Radiol. 1999;54(11):703–72.

Skeletal Trauma

JohnL.Johnson andRobertGolden
4

Introduction

A foundation in orthopedic trauma and fracture care is crucial to understanding the treatment of the musculoskeletal system. Skeletal trauma can be divided into fractures, dislocations, and com­binations of these, i.e., fracture/dislocations. A fracture is a disruption in the continuity of corti­cal and/or cancellous bone. A dislocation is a dis­ruption of the normal articulating anatomy of a joint. Dislocations can be either a complete dis­ruption of the normal anatomy or a partial dislo­cation, termed as subluxation. A fracture/ dislocation is a fracture occurring in or near a joint that results in a subluxation or dislocation of the joint.
J. L. Johnson (*) MedStar Georgetown Orthopedic Institute, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
Department of Orthopedics, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA e-mail: John.L.Johnson@medstar.net
R. Golden MedStar Georgetown Orthopedic Institute, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
Department of Orthopedics, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA e-mail: Robert.D.Golden@medstar.net

Fractures

Initial Evaluation

Initial evaluation of a trauma patient with an extremity injury should begin with a thorough history, physical examination, and radiographic evaluation. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) principles should be applied prioritizing life over limb.
The history should include the mechanism and timing of injury. The mechanism can yield important information for treatment of the injury in understanding the fracture pattern, risk of associated injuries, and the degree of soft tissue and neurovascular involvement. Important com­ponents of the mechanism are blunt vs. penetrat­ing and high vs. low energy. There is a direct correlation between the amount of energy absorbed by the extremity and resulting bone and soft tissue damage. A high energy mechanism such as a motor vehicle collision, or fall from sig­nicant height carries more signicant risk of injuries to other musculoskeletal structures, head injury, or chest/abdominal injury. Lower energy mechanisms such as a ground level fall are more likely to be isolated injuries with a lower risk of multisystem trauma, and extensive soft tissue damage. However, patients with a pre-existing poor soft tissue envelope such as the elderly may have a signicant soft tissue injury despite a rela­tively low energy mechanism injury. The timing
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 W. F. Postma et al. (eds.), Essentials of Orthopedic Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66215-7_4
53
54
J. L. Johnson and R. Golden
of the injury must also be noted. This is particu­larly important in the case of a vascular injury and determining the length of time a limb has been ischemic. Ischemia leads to increased risk of infection and tissue loss after 4–6h of warm ischemia time.
Physical examination of a trauma patient should include the inspection and evaluation of the entire patient to identify any occult injuries as well as a thorough inspection of the affected limb noting any gross deformity and a circumferential examination of the skin. Any open wounds, abrasions, or bruising should be noted. The neu­rovascular status of the limb should be carefully ascertained and documented. The pulses distal to the injury should be attempted to be palpated. If there is no pulse, this may be due to vascular injury, occlusion due to a displaced fracture or dislocation, vascular spasm, or poor perfusion secondary to shock. A Doppler ultrasound may be used to nd the pulse and ABIs (ankle brachial index) documented to better dene the vascular status of the limb. Radiographic evaluation should include at a minimum two orthogonal views of any affected bone or joint or any area with any suspicion of an injury, as well as the joint above and below any area of concern.
With a complete history, physical examina­tion, and radiographic evaluation of the affected extremity, the principles described in the remain­der of this chapter may be applied to develop a plan for appropriate treatment.

Fracture Descriptors

An adequate grasp of describing fracture patterns is useful both for communication with members of the care team and for appropriate treatment. Though each fracture is different, most of them can be sorted into the following categories. These general descriptors are as follows:
Open versus closed: A closed fracture is one in
which the skin is intact over the fracture site.
An open fracture is a fracture with a disruption
of the skin within the zone of injury of the frac-
ture. Open fractures were colloquially known
as “compound fractures.” While this term may be useful in discussions with patients, it is not used in orthopedic terminology.
It is important to understand that the clinical and
radiographic appearance of a fractured extrem­ity is a snapshot in time. Bones can shift great distances while being fractured; shortening, angulating, and translating. Wounds that appear remote from the resting position of the fracture at the time of patient presentation may in fact have been caused by the bone during the process of it being fractured.
Simple versus comminuted: A simple fracture is
one in which there are only two major frag­ments and one fracture line. A comminuted fracture is one in which there are multiple fragments of bone and multiple fracture lines.
Complete versus incomplete: A complete fracture
is one in which the fracture line goes completely across the bone. Incomplete fractures, almost exclusively seen in children, have a fracture line that only crosses one cortex of the bone involved.

Fracture Deformities

A fracture can be deformed in any one of three possible planes. Traditionally, the deformity is described by the relative position of the distal fragment in relation to the proximal fragment. Classic deformations are described as follows:
1. Displacement is the amount of translation of the distal fragment in relation to the proximal fragment in either the anterior/posterior or the medial/lateral planes. Displacement is the opposite of apposition.
2. Angulation occurs when two fracture frag­ments are not aligned and an angular defor­mity is present in either the anterior/posterior, the medial/lateral planes, or a combination of both planes. Alignment means that the axes of the proximal and distal fragments are parallel to each other and the joint above and below are in the normal (anatomic) relationship. Angulation is typically described by the direc­tion in which the apex of the angle points— medial, lateral, anterior, posterior, etc.
4 Skeletal Trauma
55
3. Rotation occurs when there is an axial change between the two fractured fragments in the transverse plane.
4. Shortening or lengthening occurs when the distal fragment is positioned in relation to the proximal fragment to either decrease or increase the overall length of the fractured bone.

Fracture Patterns

A number of basic fracture patterns have been described. They include:
1. Transverse: A pattern where the fracture line is perpendicular to the shaft of a long bone (Fig.4.1).
2. Spiral: A pattern secondary to a torsional mechanism where the fracture line “wraps around” the bone. This typically results in two sharp diaphyseal spikes on each end of the fracture (Fig.4.2).
3. Oblique: A pattern where the fracture line crosses the bone at an angle (Fig.4.3).
4. Impacted or compressed (Fig.4.4).
5. Avulsion (Fig.4.5).
6. Complex (Fig.4.6).
7. Segmental: A pattern where the bone (often the diaphysis) is fractured in more than one location. This pattern is most commonly seen in high energy mechanisms (Fig.4.7).
Fracture Mode ofLoading
The biomechanics that create a fracture can offer some information as to the likely mecha­nism of injury and clues to other injuries that might have occurred in association with the pri­mary and often more obvious injury. Biome­chanical analyses have demonstrated the typical fracture patterns that occur with specic modes of loading:
Fig. 4.1 Transverse fracture—a transverse fracture of the radius in a pediatric patient. The fracture line is perpen­dicular to the shaft
Fig. 4.2 Spiral fracture—a spiral fracture of the humeral shaft. The arrows mark the diaphyseal spikes
56
Fig. 4.3 Oblique fracture—an oblique radial shaft fracture
J. L. Johnson and R. Golden
Fig. 4.4 Impacted fracture—a pilon fracture with metaphyseal impaction. The compressed metaphyseal bone is marked by the arrow
4 Skeletal Trauma
Fig. 4.5 Avulsion fracture—this is a “tongue type” calcaneal fracture. The yellow area denotes the avulsion portion due to the insertion of the achilles
57
Fig. 4.6 Ballistic humeral shaft fracture—the proximal fragment is severely comminuted; the distal component is oblique
58
Fig. 4.7 Segmental fracture—a segmental fracture in the femoral shaft
– Bending loading produces a transverse frac-
ture – Torsional loading produces a spiral fracture – Axial loading produces a compression or
impacted fracture – Tensile loading produces an avulsion fracture – Combined loading such as bending and axial
loading, which together produce an oblique
fracture.
Taken together with the magnitude of fracture
displacement and comminution, the fracture pattern suggests the direction and amount of force applied during the injury. From the degree of injury, an extrapolation can be made that predicts the amount of soft tissue damage associated with the fracture.
J. L. Johnson and R. Golden
The types of injury involving them are covered in the following sections.

Vascular Injury

Vascular injuries can sometimes be caused by or associated with fractures. When arterial injuries occur, it is always an emergent situation. Vascular/ Trauma surgeons should be consulted immediately. Often a combination case in which the orthopedic surgeon temporarily stabilizes the bone and the vascular surgeon restores blood ow is undertaken emergently in order to preserve the limb. Injury to arterial vessels is uncommon because these vessels are elastic and mobile. The vessels can be damaged when they are either inelastic as in atherosclerosis or xed by soft tissue structures.
One special form of a vascular injury is com­partment syndrome. Increased pressure within a fascial compartment can cause muscle necrosis in a relatively short period of time. In the front of the leg, for example, the anterior compartment is bounded by the tibia, the syndesmotic membrane, the bula, and the fascia overlying the tibialis ante­rior muscle. Since none of these four boundaries can be stretched, the contents of the compart­ment—that is, the tibialis anterior muscle among others—will necrose from excess increased pres­sure occurring after trauma. Muscle necrosis and nerve damage can occur in a relatively short period of time. Early diagnosis is essential. The diagnosis of a compartment syndrome is primarily based on clinical ndings although in obtunded patients compartmental pressure monitoring can assist with the diagnosis. The earliest and most reliable diagnostic indicator of compartment syndrome is pain out of proportion on exam, particularly with passive stretch of the muscles in the involved com­partment. Once the diagnosis is conrmed, imme­diate surgical release of the compartment via fasciotomy is required.

Soft Tissues

As mentioned above, a number of soft tissues can be damaged. They include the periosteum, blood vessels, nerves, muscles, tendons, and ligaments.

Nerve Damage

A nerve can be compressed, contused, or stretched due to a fracture or dislocation. Classic examples include radial nerve injury secondary
4 Skeletal Trauma
to fractures of the distal humerus and sciatic nerve injury following posterior fracture disloca­tions of the hip. The types of neural injuries are as follows:
1. Neuropraxia. Death of the axon does not occur. The most common mechanism is nerve stretch and usually improves by itself in weeks to months. The nerve is anatomically intact and physiologically nonfunctional.
2. Axonotmesis. Axonotmesis is an anatomic disruption of the axon in its sheath. Improvement follows regeneration, the axon growing at a rate of 1 mm a day along the existing axonal sheath.
3. Neurotmesis. This is an anatomic disruption of the nerve including the sheath. Surgical repair is required if recovery is to occur.

Muscle Injury

In any fracture or dislocation, there is always some associated muscle damage. The extent of this dam­age and the effects vary depending on the direction of force and the amount of energy imparted to the limb during fracture. Rarely complete transection of the muscle belly can occur. More often a partial tear or contusion occurs. Heterotopic ossication is a specic complication of muscle contusion in which heterotopic bone forms within the damaged muscle or in normal muscle after traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries. Certain fractures, such as acetabulum fractures requiring a posterior approach for xation and distal humerus fractures, are more prone to develop heterotopic ossication than other fractures (Fig.4.8).

Ligament Tears

59
Fig. 4.8 Heterotopic ossication (HO)—the arrow is pointing to an area of HO that occurred following xation of an acetabular fracture
Age is an important determinant of the injury type that results from the application of a trau­matic force. At any given age, the “weak link,” or the rst structure to fail, varies; it could be bone, ligament, or cartilage growth plates. Once growth plates close, ligaments are the most likely structures to fail in an injury. Ligamentous strength is relatively constant throughout life. With aging, there is a decrease in cancellous bone volume and an increase in cortical bone porosity. With increasing age, therefore, bone becomes weaker; hence, ligament and cartilage injuries are less likely than bone injuries. Thus, the same mode of loading can produce different injury patterns depending on the age of the patient. A lateral force, such as a tackle in foot­ball or a blow by an automobile on the outer side of the knee, may cause a fracture through the distal femoral growth plate in a 12-year-old, a tear of the medial and anterior cruciate ligaments in a college football player, and a tibial plateau fracture in a 70-year-old.
Ligaments regulate the movements of bones that form a joint. Damage to these structures are called sprains. Complete disruption can result in a joint dislocation in the acute setting and insta­bility of the joint in the long term.

Classic Fractures

A number of classic fracture types have been described in the literature. They are dened in the sections below.