Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5181_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
264
K. W. Zittel and M. W. Kessler
Fig. 11.1 Anterior and posterior views of a right elbow joint demonstrate the three articulations, including the ulnotrochlear joint, the radiocapitellar joint, and the proximal radioulnar joint
The medial column develops a broad outcrop­ping called the medial epicondyle and is bridged laterally to the capitellum by the trochlea, a spool­shaped articular segment with a 300° arc of carti­lage. The trochlea is cradled by the sigmoid notch of the olecranon, creating the ulnar- humeral joint (or ulnotrochlear joint). The sigmoid notch is a deep, semilunar shaped recess, with anterior and posterior prominences called the coronoid and olecranon processes, respectively.
Proximal to the trochlea, medial and lateral humeral columns converge centrally to create two fossae on the volar and dorsal aspects of the distal humerus. The volar coronoid and dorsal olecranon fossae are depressions that allow the tip of the coronoid and posterior olecranon pro­cesses to recess beyond the cortical width of the humerus at terminal exion and extension.
The ulnar-humeral joint is considered the most important static stabilizer in the elbow.
In the sagittal plane, the trochlea is exed ~30° anteriorly, and sits within the reciprocally
oriented (posterior angled) sigmoid notch; framed and deepened by its coronoid and olecra­non processes (Fig.11.2). The reciprocal align­ment and complementary ulnar-humeral relationship are why the elbow is often referred to as “highly constrained” and “inherently sta­ble,” all the while allowing a tremendous exion– extension arc of motion.
Unlike the shoulder whose stability is depen­dent on surrounding soft tissues, the osseous anatomy of the elbow renders its stability. Yet, the elbow is capable of rapid changes in position and at extreme ranges of motion, subjecting it to large and repetitive static/dynamic forces. To maintain its stability and articular congruence during ex­ion/extension, rotatory motion, and varus/valgus directed stress, the elbow is supplemented by two important ligamentous structures. The medial collateral ligament complex (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament complex (LCL). Both of these structures are considered to be primary static sta­bilizers of the elbow.
11 The Elbow
Fig. 11.2 Lateral X-ray of the elbow
The MCL has three segments; the most impor­tant for stability is the anterior bundle. It primar­ily resists against valgus directed stress. It attaches the medial epicondyle to the medial ulna at the sublime tubercle (Fig.11.3).
On the lateral side of the elbow, the LCL con­sists of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL), which attaches the lateral epicondyle to the lateral ulna, at the tubercle of the supinator crest. In addition to the LUCL, included in the LCL is the annular ligament (surrounding the radial head and helps to stabilize the ulnar and humeral articulation), the radial collateral liga­ment, and the accessory lateral collateral liga­ment. Of its four components, the lateral ulnar collateral ligament is the most important primary static stabilizer of the elbow to varus and external rotational stresses (Fig.11.4).
Anteriorly and posteriorly the elbow joint is lined by a single-cell layer of synovium and cov­ered by a relatively thick brous capsule. Beneath the capsule, within the olecranon and coronoid fossae, a fatty layer of tissue is present between the synovium and the surrounding capsule (Fig.11.5). This layer is of signicance in radiographic evalu­ation of elbows in which intra- articular (intracap-
265
sular) effusion (uid) or hemarthrosis (bleeding into the joint) causes capsular distention. Subsequently, the displacement of these fat pads is either anterior or posterior to their usual position.

Muscles

The muscles surrounding or crossing the elbow can be divided into separate groups based on their location in the arm or forearm (anterior, posterior) and function (exion, extension). They originate in the upper arm, on the epicondyles, or proximal forearm. They can be thought of as four groups including the wrist/nger exor and extensor compartments; and the elbow exor and extensor compartments.
The extensor compartment of the elbow (pos­terior) consists of the triceps/triceps brachii (Long, medial, lateral heads). It inserts as one tri­ceps tendon on the olecranon process to provide a powerful extension moment.
The elbow exor muscles specically can be found at the anterior aspect of the distal humerus and consists of the brachioradialis, brachialis, and biceps/biceps brachii (long and short heads). The brachioradialis is the most supercial lateral elbow muscle, arising from the anterior lateral aspect of the distal humerus, crosses the elbow joint and helps elbow exion via its insertion on the radial styloid (lateral distal radius at the wrist). The brachialis, deep to the biceps, is the elbow’s primary exor. It originates broadly along the anterior humeral shaft and inserts distal to the coronoid of the proximal ulna on the ulnar tuberosity. The biceps, with two heads (long­lateral, short-medial), crosses the elbow and has two insertions that blend on the proximal radius.
1. The short head of the biceps (medial side of
arm) inserts on to the distal and apex of the radial tuberosity, providing exion strength (20% compared to brachialis giving 80% of elbows exion strength).
2. The long head of the biceps (lateral side of
arm) inserts on to the oval footprint of the radial tuberosity more medial and is a strong forearm supinator.
266
Medial Epicondyle
Sublime Tubercle
ab
P
Lateral ulnar collateral ligament
Supinator Crest
ab
K. W. Zittel and M. W. Kessler
Anterior Bundle
Posterior Bundle
Transverse Ligament
Fig. 11.3 (a) A schematic view of a right elbow demon- strating the three bundles or bands of the Medial Collateral Ligament complex. The anterior bundle is most important
Anterior capsule
Radial collateral ligament
Annular ligament
osterior capsule
Capsule
in elbow stability and attaches at the sublime tubercle of the ulna. (b) Grossly, these ligaments are seen as thicken­ings, blending with the joint capsule as depicted in b
Lateral epicondyle
Capsule
Fig. 11.4 (a) A lateral view of a right elbow demonstrat- ing the lateral collateral ligament complex (LCL) consist­ing of the annular ligament, radial collateral ligament, and
Just distal to the elbow crease as the two heads become tendinous, the short head of the biceps tendon gives off a bicipital apo­neurosis (fascia) called the lacertus brosus. This structure travels obliquely, medially, and distally to envelop the forearm exor muscle bellies (wrist exors) and helps to protect the underlying brachial artery and median nerve.
lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). The LUCL is the most important in stability and attaches at the supinator crest of the ulna (b)
The wrist/nger exor and extensor muscle groups originating around the elbow include the extensor mass and the exor-pronator mass. The extensor mass muscles arise from the lateral epi­condyle and include the extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis, which insert on the 2nd and 3rd metacarpal, respectively (extends the wrist); and extensor carpi ulnaris, inserting on the 5th meta­carpal (extends the wrist); the extensor digitorum
C
Olecranon Bursa
in
11 The Elbow
Tr iceps Brachii
267
Brachialis
Biceps Brachii
Humerus
Posterior Fat Pad
Posterior Elbow
apsule and Synovium
Subtendinous
Olecranon Bursa
Trochlea
Articular
Surface/Cartilage
Tr iceps Tendon
Olecranon
Epiphyseal Plate
Fig. 11.5 Sagittal illustration of the elbow joint demon­strates the normal skeletal and soft tissue anatomy. Note the presence of fat pads both anteriorly and posteriorly, directly outside the joint capsule. Intra-articular swelling can lead to displacement out of the olecranon (posterior)
Biceps Tendon (Myotendinous)
Pronator Teres
Median Nerve
Brachial Artery and Ve
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis
Anterior Fat Pad
Anterior Elbow Capsule and Synovium
Coronoid Process
Semilunar Notch (Trochlear Notch)
Flexor Digitorum Profundus
Ulna
Anconeus
or coronoid (anterior) fossae, leading to the appearance of “positive fat pad sign(s)” on lateral X-rays. An anterior fat pad can be normal; a posterior fat pad if seen is always abnormal and indicates elbow effusion
communis and extensor digiti mini (extend the ngers). Deep to these posterior muscles lies the supinator muscle which originates on the proxi­mal ulna and inserts on the proximal radius. It assists the biceps with supination of the forearm. In addition, the anconeus is a small triangular muscle that originates on the lateral epicondyle and inserts on the lateral aspect of the olecranon, it is thought to assist with elbow extension and lateral stability of the elbow (Fig.11.6).
The exor-pronator mass takes its origin from the medial epicondyle, the medial ulna, and the interosseous membrane. From proximal to distal
absent in ~30% of population); exor digitorum supercialis, inserting on middle phalanges 2–5 (nger exion at PIP and MCP joints); and the exor carpi ulnaris, inserting on the pisiform, hook of hamate, 5th metacarpal (wrist exion). Occasionally, there is an accessory muscle present supercially at the medial elbow called the anco­neus epitrochlearis. It is present in approximately 15% of the population and can be a source of com­pression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel.

Neurovascular

on the medial epicondyle, it consists of the prona­tor teres, inserting on mid lateral radius (forearm pronation); exor carpi radialis, inserting on 2nd metacarpal (wrist exion); palmaris longus, insert­ing on exor retinaculum (weak wrist exor/
In contrast to deeper-seated neurovascular struc­tures of other extremities, those about the elbow are both tightly concentrated and supercial, making them uniquely vulnerable to both direct
268
K. W. Zittel and M. W. Kessler
Fig. 11.6 Medial view of forearm demonstrating the exor-pronator muscle mass and lateral view showing extensor mass. Note the common tendon origins on the
and indirect injury. Injuries or symptoms due to nerve involvement around the elbow make famil­iarization with normal neurovascular anatomy crucial.
Brachial Artery
The brachial artery lies anterior to the medial aspect of the brachialis muscle, entering the ante­cubital space medial to the biceps tendon and lat­eral to the median nerve. At the level of the radial head, it divides into its terminal branches, the ulnar and radial arteries.
Musculocutaneous Nerve
Continuing from the lateral cord of the brachial plexus and composed of bers from the C5–C8 nerve roots, this nerve travels through (and inner­vates) the biceps and brachialis. Injury to the musculocutaneous nerve results in inability to ex the elbow and loss of sensation to the lateral forearm from its terminal sensory branch, the lat­eral antebrachial cutaneous nerve (LABCN). The LABCN is vulnerable to injury during anterior approaches to the elbow, especially during distal biceps repair.
Median Nerve
Arising from C5–T1 nerve roots, combined from the upper and lower cords, the median nerve trav­els along anterior to the brachialis muscle, enters the antecubital fossa, then passes medial to the biceps tendon and the brachial artery. It then passes through the pronator teres and gives off the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN), a branch which supplies motor innervation to the exor pollicis longus, the index and middle exor digi-
medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus over lie the elbow capsule, medial and lateral ligamentous complexes
torum profundus, and the pronator quadratus. Injury to the AIN results in the inability to ex the thumb at the IP joint. The remainder contin­ues distally in the forearm under the exor digito­rum supercialis. The median nerve provides sensory innervation to the volar radial aspect of the hand, including the thumb, index, middle, and radial half of ring nger; dorsally its sensory con­tribution is isolated, present only distal to the IP joint of the thumb and the PIP joints of the index, middle, and radial half of the ring nger. Sensory testing is commonly performed at the volar index or middle nger.
Radial Nerve
Originating from C6–8 nerve roots, the radial nerve is a continuation of the posterior cord and travels in the spiral (radial) groove of the proxi­mal humerus until its encountered laterally at the distal 1/3 of the humerus, entering the anterior compartment between the brachialis and brachio­radialis. It innervates the triceps, brachioradialis, and extensor carpi radialis longus and brevis muscles. In the antecubital fossa, anterior to the lateral epicondyle, the nerve divides into a deep motor branch, or posterior interosseous nerve (PIN); and a supercial sensory branch continues underneath the brachioradialis to provide sensa­tion to the dorsal radial aspect of the wrist and hand to the level of the IP joint of the thumb, and PIP joints of the index, middle, and radial half of the ring nger. Check radial sensory function over the dorsal thumb–index web space. The PIN is found on the posterolateral surface of the radius after it pierces the supinator muscle entering the posterior compartment. The PIN innervates the
11 The Elbow
269
supinator, extensor carpi radialis brevis, extensor digitorum communis, extensor carpi ulnaris, extensor pollicis longus and brevis, extensor indicis, and abductor pollicis longus. Injury to PIN results in inability to extend the wrist or ngers.
Ulnar Nerve
Derived from roots C8 and T1, the ulnar nerve continues from the medial cord of the brachial plexus until passing posteriorly through the inter­muscular septum at the level of the mid-humerus. It then travels through the cubital tunnel of the medial elbow, where pathologic compression, traction, or irritation commonly can occur. In the forearm, the ulnar nerve innervates the exor carpi ulnaris and the ulnar half of the exor digi­torum profundus. Distally, it continues to provide motor function to many of the intrinsic hand muscles and sensation to the skin of the ulnar wrist/hand (palmar cutaneous branch), little n­ger and ulnar half of ring nger both volarly (supercial cutaneous branch), and dorsally (dor­sal cutaneous branch). Sensory testing commonly occurs at the ulnar border of the little nger. Injury to the ulnar nerve can result in a loss of nger abduction; test by crossing the index and middle nger.
Extrinsic muscles (located in the forearm) innervated by the ulnar nerve include exor carpi ulnaris, medial half of exor digitorum profun­dus (4th and 5th digit). Intrinsic muscles (located in the hand) innervated by the ulnar nerve include: 1 thenar muscle (adductor pollicis—oblique and transverse heads), 3 hypothenar muscles (exor digiti minimi, abductor digiti minimi, opponens digiti minimi), the 3rd and 4th (ulnar/medial two) lumbricals, all 7 interossei muscles (three volar interossei and four dorsal interossei), and pal­maris brevis.
“FOAL” Mnemonic for the four intrinsic hand muscles, not innervated by the ulnar nerve. Instead, are innervated by the median nerve:
F: exor pollicis brevis O: opponens pollicis A: abductor pollicis brevis L: lateral/radial two (1st and 2nd) lumbricals
Evaluation ofElbow Problems
The evaluation of elbow problems relies on a thorough history, physical, and radiographic examination, supplemented by other pertinent clinical or diagnostic tests when indicated.

History

Elbow problems can be divided into two major categories: (1) acute traumatic injuries and (2) chronic elbow problems which tend to be more atraumatic in nature, though can present as post­traumatic sequelae. In the situation of acute trauma, a detailed history of the event must be obtained. The mechanism of injury including the position of the arm, initial treatment, and subse­quent symptoms are all very important in guiding further evaluation and management. For chronic elbow conditions, the most common complaint is pain. Stiffness or other mechanical symptoms such as locking, catching, or instability may accompany pain or become the primary problem. Determine what treatments the patient has had including specics of previous surgery, and if anything has been effective.
The nature of the pain and any zone to which they radiate is important. For example, is it burn­ing or radiating (nerve) or is it an aching related only to activity (tendinitis)? Does it hurt at rest or at night (tumor, infection)? Establish the exact location of the symptoms and if there is a rela­tionship to the patient’s activity. In a throwing athlete, when during the pitch or throw does the pain occur? Medial elbow pain when the arm is in the cocking position suggests medial collateral ligament pathology, whereas medial pain during follow-through suggests involvement of the exor-pronator group or impingement in the pos­terior ulnar-humeral joint.
Is it associated with any other symptoms, such as neck pain (cervical radiculopathy) or wrist pain (distal radioulnar joint problem)? Numbness, tingling, and weakness may be obvious clues to neurologic involvement, but sometimes nerve entrapment syndromes in the arm or neck present with pain only. In addition to inquiring about
270
K. W. Zittel and M. W. Kessler
tingling or numbness, ask about weakness or loss of dexterity.
The elbow is commonly involved (and some­times one of the rst joints affected) in inamma­tory arthritides, so it is important to elicit a history of other joint complaints, known arthritis, and family history. Is there a history of skin problems (lupus, dermatitis, psoriasis) or gastrointestinal problems (colitis)? Have there been any systemic symptoms of illness (malaise, fevers), suggesting septic arthritis?
Perhaps the most important part of the his­tory is determining how the symptoms interfere with function and is the patient's dominant extremity affected. This can direct treatment strategies more than any other factors. For example, a functional arc of motion, 30–130° exion/extension, 50° pronation, 50° supina­tion, is typically relied upon for most activities of daily living. The inability to ex the elbow completely is generally well tolerated by most patients. However, considering a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, shoulder motion may already be compromised, thus, a seemingly mild degree of elbow restriction actually may inter­fere with independence, and/or their ability to feed or clean themselves.

Physical Examination

The examination of the elbow begins with inspec­tion, palpation, passive/active range of motion assessments, evaluation for strength, and neuro­vascular integrity. These maneuvers are then fol­lowed by special tests, designed to evaluate specic conditions based on the examiner’s dif­ferential diagnosis. A thorough physical exam should also include a directed evaluation of the shoulder, wrist and hand, including the cervical spine when relevant.
Inspection begins with careful observation of elbow, forearm, and hand use as soon as one begins interaction with the patient. Does the patient extend the elbow to shake hands with the examiner? Are there obvious adaptive maneuvers that the patient uses to avoid pain or compensate for functional loss?
A more formal visual exam is then performed. One should evaluate the elbow alignment (neu­tral, varus, and valgus) in exion/extension, and the “valgus carrying angle.” The carrying angle is formed between the longitudinal axis of the humerus/forearm with the elbow in extension (normally 10–15° valgus). With the elbow exed 90°, note that the normal bony prominences (medial/lateral epicondyles/olecranon) form an equilateral triangle. In dislocations, this normal relationship is often distorted. Look for evidence of joint swelling laterally by inspection of the soft tissue triangle bordered by the radial head, olecranon tip, and lateral epicondyle.
Palpate the anterior, medial, lateral, and poste­rior elbow in a systematic fashion, noting its ana­tomic structures: the medial epicondyle, lateral epicondyle, olecranon, radio capitellar joint, biceps, triceps, forearm muscle masses and their respective origins. Be specic in trying to iden­tify the exact area of tenderness.
Note the location and timing of pain during motion. Check both active and passive motion, noting any difference between them. Comparing the ROM to the unaffected side can serve as a reference. Normal exion values are on average between 130 and 154° and extension between −6 and 11°; pronation from 75 to 85° and supination from 80 to 104°. If passive motion is greater than active motion, consider pain, muscle, or nerve injury as possible causes.
Check for sensation to light touch and motor function in the distribution of the ulnar, median, radial nerves, and specic branches (AIN, PIN, cutaneous). A positive Tinel sign is useful in the assessment of peripheral entrapment problems. Gently tapping in the vicinity of suspected pathology reproduces the symptoms, causing numbness, tingling, or pain in the nerves distribu­tion indicating a positive test.
Vascular assessment is mandatory after any acute elbow trauma or suspected vascular compro­mise from pathology at the elbow. It includes pal­pation of the radial and ulnar arteries at the wrist, and the brachial artery in the antecubital fossa. If an extremity appears warm, pink, and well per­fused, but there is delayed capillary rell (>2s), a nonpalpable, “thready” or weak pulse, compared
11 The Elbow
271
to the unaffected side, a portable ultrasound­Doppler should be used to conrm the presence or absence of an arterial pulse. Doppler is commonly used for objective exam trending or clinical conr­mation when examination is limited by factors such as patients body habitus, acute traumatic/ post-operative swelling, overlying wounds, over­lying splint/bandages, vascular disease. Specic physical examination tests and signs are useful depending on the condition suspected.

Radiographic Evaluation

Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays are the minimum views necessary to evaluate the elbow joint. Following trauma, additional views are often necessary, including oblique elbow and radiocapitellar joint / radial head views (Figs.11.7 and 11.8). Obtain full forearm/wrist and humerus/ shoulder series if concomitant injury is suspected or for preoperative planning. After any fracture manipulation or reduction maneuvers with appli­cation of an immobilizing split, it is prudent to obtain repeat “post-reduction” X-rays to assure
adequate osseous alignment, soft tissue integrity, and splint mold or position as it relates.
Alignment: On a lateral XR of the elbow, align­ment should be assessed by the anterior humeral line (AHL) and radiocapitellar line (RCL). The AHL is drawn down the anterior cortex of the humerus and should intersect the middle 1/3rd of the capitellum. If it does not, consider a distal humerus fracture. On AP and lateral XR, the RCL is drawn along the radial neck and should always intersect the capitellum. If it does not, consider radial head dislocation or subluxation, and check for accompanying fracture, especially at the proxi­mal ulna (Monteggia fracture).
Bones: Trace the cortex of each bone, the dis­tal humerus, radial head-neck-shaft, olecranon, coronoid process, and ulnar shaft. Evaluate the joint surfaces and space. Look for lucency, ero­sions, osteophytes, cortical irregularity, and com­mon fractures: radial head and neck, capitellum, coronoid, olecranon, epicondyles, distal humerus.
Effusion: On a lateral elbow X-ray, the pres­ence of a posterior fat pad (usually deeply con­tained in olecranon fossa) indicates an elbow effusion. Think occult intra-articular fracture not well visualized on XR; commonly radial head/
a b
Fig. 11.7 (a) Lateral X-ray view demonstrating a posterior elbow fracture dislocation with an osseous fragment anteri­orly and irregular radial head contour with cortical step off at the articular surface. Findings indicate a displaced intra­articular radial head fracture and possible coronoid process
fracture. (b) Attempted AP view redemonstrates a postero­lateral dislocation and radial head fracture. In addition to the above elbow X-ray series, two views (AP and Lateral) of the wrist, forearm, and humerus is recommended, three views if concern for concomitant injury or fracture
272
ab
K. W. Zittel and M. W. Kessler
c
Fig. 11.8 Elbow fracture dislocation status post­reduction and splinting. After reduction, the next step in management of this injury is to obtain a CT scan of the elbow to further evaluate the fracture patterns and for pre­operative planning. The presence of a coronoid fracture, known dislocation (LUCL injury), and radial head frac­ture is often referred to as the “Terrible Triad” because of its frequency of persistent instability if not surgically treated. (a) Lateral view of left elbow demonstrating a concentrically reduced ulnotrochlear joint; a well reduced radiocapitellar joint with alignment conrmed by the
neck in an adult or supracondylar fracture in a child. A small anterior fat pad can be seen in patients and considered normal, though it may be signicant with a history of trauma or if mas­sively raised.
Beyond X-rays, the following special radio-
graphic tests can be helpful.
Stress X-Rays
Stress views may be helpful in evaluating the patient with a suspected tear of the medial or lat­eral collateral ligament complexes. This is achieved through manual stress, during which the clinician applies a valgus or varus stress to the elbow to open the contralateral side, with 2mm of gapping usually indicating pathology.
straight radiocapitellar line intersecting the radial head and capitellum. Re-demonstrated is the radial head frac­ture and small coronoid process fracture. Note the pres­ence of a posterior slab plaster splint with cotton (webril) padded soft tissue protection. Elbow reduction held by the splint in 70–80° of exion to diminished risk of compart­ment syndrome from an increase in antebrachial soft tis­sue pressure seen with excessive elbow exion past 90°. (b) Anterior–Posterior view and (c) External Oblique X-ray views demonstrating appropriate reduction
can help to discern seemingly unidentiable elbow anatomy sometimes encountered on initial injury XRs.
Computed Tomography
Computed tomography (CT) scans without con­trast enhancement are effective in preoperative planning of complex elbow trauma, assessment of bone fracture morphology and joint deformity, and occasionally for the evaluation of loose bod­ies of the elbow. A CT with intravenous contrast can be obtained to evaluate the presence of infec­tion/abscesses within the surrounding soft tissue. A CT angiogram (CTA), using arterial contrast, can help identify locations of vascular injury, occlusion, or compression.
Traction X-Rays
In the case of a severely shortened or commi­nuted distal humerus or proximal ulna/radius fractures, traction X-rays can be performed, uti­lizing a principle called ligamentotaxis. The is dened as the molding fracture fragments into alignment because of tension applied across a fracture by the surrounding intact soft tissues and
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without con­trast provides superior soft tissue imaging and allows visualization of cartilage, marrow and vascularity changes in bone. Its current use about the elbow includes imaging occult fractures, tumors, infections, synovitis or other causes of joint effusion, and osteochondritis dissecans. It
11 The Elbow
273
also can be repeated after time to compare and evaluate stages of osteochondral healing. It is occasionally useful in evaluating ligament dis­ruptions, but it is usually unnecessary in diagnos­ing medial or lateral epicondylitis and rarely helpful in nerve entrapment syndromes. MRI with contrast enhancement is generally reserved for infectious or oncologic pathology.

Electrodiagnostic Tests

Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction velocity (NCV) testing have denite indications in the patient with suspected nerve entrapment or injury. Such testing may indicate the site of the compression or injury. However, failure to dem­onstrate specic neurologic ndings by electrodi­agnostic testing does not rule out their presence.
Treatment ofElbow Problems: Introduction toNonoperative andOperative Principles
Treatment of elbow problems is algorithmic, dividing conditions into either traumatic or atrau­matic causes. One general principle of treatment in the elbow is to minimize the length of immobi­lization. The adult elbow has a high propensity for developing stiffness with prolonged immobi­lization (>2 weeks), especially after fracture or dislocation. The resultant loss of motion can be disabling, and treatment for it can be prolonged and difcult. Because of this, in the adult popula­tion, casting with circumferentially wrapped berglass for the treatment of upper arm/elbow injuries or fractures is uncommon. Occasionally, after initial management/immobilization, casting for denitive management is indicated in adults if they are nonsurgical candidates or in specic cir­cumstances such as cognitive impairment or compliance concerns. This is a different treat­ment strategy than in adolescent or pediatric elbow/arm injuries which often are casted. The developing elbow in children can tolerate longer periods of immobilization. Therefore, circumfer­ential berglass casting, with or without bi-
valving (splitting/cutting the berglass with a cast saw and loose overwrap), commonly is used as a primary means of treatment.
In adults, when immobilization is indicated acutely, noncircumferential berglass or plaster splints or a brace is often placed with the elbow positioned in 90° of exion and neutral pronation/ supination. This allows for maintenance of the most useful arc of function and a position of max­imal capsular volume (less pain/intracapsular pressure/stretch from effusion). After an initial treatment such as closed reduction, casting, splint­ing, external xation, internal xation, one should carefully assess and sometimes trend the patient’s neurovascular exam. Swelling commonly increases up to 24h after an acute injury and the multiple conned fascial compartments of the forearm leave patients vulnerable to compartment syndrome or other severe compromise. Avoidable iatrogenic causes (caused by treatment), include circumferential casting or excessively tight wrap­ping of an acutely swollen extremity, and elbow immobilization in exaggerated exion (>90–100°) increasing anterior antecubital pressure. Occa­sionally, splinting of the arm in varying degrees of extension, pronation, supination is necessary for elbow stability after reduction, unstable fractures, anatomic considerations, or comfort.

Nonoperative Treatment

Rehabilitation andPain Management
Rehabilitation through either a patient self­guided program or formal occupational/physical therapy plays an important role in the treatment of elbow problems. The goals should include (1) reduction of pain and inammation, (2) restora­tion of motion, (3) rebuilding strength, and (4) return to normal function and activity. These goals, often accomplished with help of hand/ elbow therapists, should be carefully monitored by the treating physician until the patient is dis­charged or alternative management is instituted.
Elbow stiffness is best treated by prevention. Restoration of motion lost is done through careful stretching exercises and takes much longer to regain than to lose. Once lost, motion return is best