Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5181_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
89 Мб
Скачать
8 Sports Medicine oftheHip andKnee
Fig. 8.7 Coronal MRI of the knee demonstrating medial meniscus deciency after an ACL reconstruction. On the left-hand side of the image, the triangle-shaped lateral meniscus (blue arrow) is present. On the right-hand side of the image, the medial meniscus is missing a signicant portion (red arrow) due to a combination of chronic menis­cal degeneration and prior surgery (partial meniscectomy)
tial to heal after being torn. The middle third of the meniscus (red-white zone) is partially vascu­larized and has intermediate healing potential. The central third of the meniscus (white-white zone) is avascular and has poor healing potential. In general, tears in the white-white zone are debrided, while tears in the red-red zone are repaired. It is important to preserve as much functional meniscus tissue as possible when debriding meniscal tears, as complete meniscec­tomy will lead to accelerated osteoarthritis.
Evaluation ofCommon Sports Medicine Injuries
The principles involved in the initial evaluation of the injured athlete focus on history and a focused physical examination. Oftentimes inju­ries to the athlete are seen in real time which helps better understand the mechanism of injury and narrows the differential diagnosis For exam­ple, a football player who gets tackled from the
193
III II I
Fig. 8.8 Depiction of the vascular zones of the meniscus. The right-hand side of the image demonstrates the periph­ery of the meniscus with the highest vascularity and best propensity to heal after injury (zone I or the red–red zone). The central segment has an intermediate vascular supply and intermediate propensity to heal after injury (zone II or the red–white zone). The left-hand side of the image dem­onstrates the central portion of the meniscus with the least vascularity and lowest propensity to heal after injury (zone III or the white–white zone). (Published with per­mission from Springer Publishing from Balke, M., Almqvist, K.F., Vansintjan, P., Verdonk, R., Verdonk, P., Hoeher, J. (2016). Traumatic Lesions in a Stable Knee: Masterly Neglect—Meniscectomy—Repair. In: Hulet, C., Pereira, H., Peretti, G., Denti, M. (eds) Surgery of the Meniscus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg)
side and sustains a valgus blow to the knee would likely have an MCL injury, whereas a player who is cutting or pivoting and feels a pop in their knee without contacting another player would be more likely to have an ACL tear. The on-eld sports medicine physician also has a “golden window” of time to evaluate the injury before the effects of swelling, pain, and muscle spasm complicate the physical exam. Additionally, signicantly dis­placed fractures or joint dislocations may be more easily reduced in this immediate post-injury setting while still on the eld. The sports medi­cine physician is frequently asked about the safety of a player returning to play after specic injuries. The return-to-play decision is based on a variety of factors including the type and severity of injury, as well as the nature of the sport and the player’s position in that sport. Knowledge of the common injuries, as well as the sporting activi-
194
W. F. Postma and N. Apselo
ties themselves, is important in making these decisions. The following sections will focus on the history as well as physical exam in the sports medicine setting. Specics regarding the injuries are elaborated on in their respective chapters.

History

The history in many sporting injuries is straight­forward and related to acute trauma. Examples include twisting the ankle when coming down for a rebound, feeling the shoulder “pop out” when being tackled, or hearing a “pop” within one’s knee on cutting cross-eld. Important in this his­tory is the mechanism of injury, as this often relates very closely with the structure injured. With the history alone, the diagnosis can be made or at least narrowed to a few potential diagnoses. Thus, the history is just as important and often­times more important than the physical examina­tion. In contrast to acute traumatic sporting injuries, overuse injuries typically have no spe­cic identiable mechanism of injury. Examples can include plantar fasciitis, shin splints, and patellar tendinitis. For these insidious conditions, it is important to obtain the specics of recent activity, including changes in activity level or type of activities (number of miles run per week), changes in shoe wear or other equipment, or changes to the surface utilized (track to road, at surface to hills, etc.). Other pertinent details include whether this problem has occurred before, and if so, how it happened, what type of treatment was rendered, and what the outcome was. Previous problems may alert the clinician to a different treatment problem to prevent recur­rence of the injury. Examples include the man­agement of “rst time” as opposed to recurrent shoulder dislocations.
Symptoms that occur with activity and improve with rest are typical of overuse injuries. Pain that awakens a patient from sleep usually indicates more serious injury or an underlying systemic disorder. Are there any specic activi­ties that might cause symptoms? In the athlete with intermittent knee symptoms, pain in the anterior aspect of the knee that is worse with stair
climbing or with prolonged sitting suggests prob­lems related to the patellofemoral joint. Symptoms that occur predictably with cutting and pivoting activities, accompanied by swelling and instability, suggest an internal derangement of the knee such as a meniscus injury or tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Physical Examination

The specic examination depends on the nature of the symptoms and the region affected. Each anatomic region and orthopedic condition has pertinent special tests. All physical examinations, however, should begin with inspection and obser­vation of the extremity. After acute injury, one should compare the injured limb in question to its opposite side. Inspection for skin changes such as ecchymoses, abrasions, and associated swelling should be performed. Determining range of motion of the joint in question, both actively and passively, is imperative. First, have the athlete move the joint in question and observe for associ­ated pain or asymmetry as compared to the oppo­site side. Examples include a patient who presents with shoulder pain of insidious onset whose active and passive range of motion is asymmetric and limited on the affected side, suggesting an adhesive capsulitis as a diagnosis. This is com­pared to a rotator cuff injury where passive range of motion would be full despite a limited active range of motion. Other examples include the inability to actively extend the knee after an acute injury, despite nearly full passive range of motion. This suggests an injury (rupture) of the extensor mechanism that can be seen in patellar tendon or quadriceps tendon ruptures, as well as some patella fractures.
Strength assessment is an important compo­nent to the exam of any joint-related injury. During strength assessment, weakness may be due to direct injury to a musculotendinous unit responsible for joint function. However, pain, guarding, or reex inhibition of muscular con­traction can also be responsible for perceived weakness on examination. The ability of the sports medicine professional to examine the ath-
8 Sports Medicine oftheHip andKnee
195
lete in the acute setting shortly after the injury (before pain and swelling set in) is especially helpful in obtaining an accurate assessment of strength. Although relatively uncommon, injuries to nerve and vascular structures can and do occur and should be ruled out as a precipitating cause of injury especially in the acute setting. Their examination is an essential component of a com­plete physical exam.
On initial examination, one should always keep an open mind for referred symptoms. In addition to examining the joint in question, one should also focus particularly on the adjacent joints, as well as the spine, for a contributing role in the symptoms. Examples include a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) of the hip in an adolescent with knee pain or a cervical disc her­niation as a cause for shoulder discomfort.
Applying special examination techniques spe­cic to the area in question and suspected diagno­sis completes the physical examination. These techniques can be found in their respective chap­ters according to the area in question. Examples of special tests include impingement signs in case of shoulder pain or apprehension in the case of shoulder instability as the arm is placed in a position of abduction and external rotation.

Special Tests

Every joint has special tests associated with them to aid in specic injuries. These are very impor­tant to diagnosis conrmation and are included to a certain extent in the specic chapters and sec­tions focused on those specic diagnoses.
X-Rays
Plain radiographs, or X-rays, are a useful tool in the initial work-up of acute traumatic injuries that occur in sports. X-rays are useful at identify­ing fractures of bones or dislocations of joints. While soft tissue injuries may not demonstrate any positive ndings on an X-ray, it is still important to rule out fracture or dislocation as causes of pain or swelling after an acute injury. When X-rays remain negative but there is a high suspicion for injury to an important structural or
functional soft tissue (e.g., anterior cruciate liga­ment, rotator cuff), then further advanced imag­ing can be obtained such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound. Specically obtained radiographic stress views can be useful in assessing joint integrity. Common examples include stress views taken for grade III injuries of the acromio­clavicular (AC) joint or stress views of lateral malleolus ankle fractures to assess for injury to the syndesmosis.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful diagnostic imaging tool within sports medicine. MRI provides for a high-resolution assessment of soft tissues that cannot be visualized on X-ray or CT.While X-ray and CT are the gold-standard for evaluation of acute fractures, MRI is more sensitive at identifying stress fractures. Endurance athletes such as long-distance run­ners who report chronic bone or joint pain with activity may have negative X-rays but ultimately end up having an occult stress fracture that is only seen on MRI.Common locations for stress fractures in athletes include the tibia, navicular, calcaneus, metatarsals, and femoral neck. The addition of intra-articular contrast (MRI arthro­gram) is especially helpful in the shoulder and hip to aid in the diagnosis of labral tears. MRI should be used judiciously as it is expensive compared to plain radiographs, and it is common to identify incidental age-related changes that often do not need intervention. It is critical to rst start with history and physical exam before proceeding with MRI to further assess a sus­pected diagnosis.
Arthroscopy
Most commonly applied to the knee, shoulder, ankle, elbow, and hip, arthroscopy is the gold­standard tool for denitive diagnosis and treat­ment of intra-articular injuries. Arthroscopy involves the use of an “arthroscope,” which is a minimally invasive tool comprised of a thin tube with a video camera and light source which is inserted into a joint through a small incision. The joint is then insufated with uid to expand the
196
Fig. 8.9 Intraoperative picture taken during a knee arthroscopy demonstrating a meniscal tear (outlined by red bar). In this image, the broad white surface along the bottom is the articular cartilage of the tibial plateau. Above this lies the meniscus, which is ipped up with a metal probe (right) to demonstrate an undersurface longi­tudinal meniscal tear
joint and allow for improved visualization and insertion of tools (Fig.8.9). Its utility in diagno­sis alone is not often utilized but can be espe­cially helpful in situations where all other diagnostic testing has not been successful in establishing a diagnosis. The overwhelming use of arthroscopy in the eld of sports medicine, however, is for the treatment of joint injuries once a diagnosis is reached (e.g., arthroscopically assisted ACL reconstruction).
W. F. Postma and N. Apselo

Acute Traumatic Injuries

Immediate
Immediate treatment begins at the time of injury. For acute traumatic injuries, it is often helpful to provide some sort of immobilization to the injured extremity to reduce pain and provide sta­bilization pending further imaging, if necessary. An example of this would be placing a knee immobilizer on a football player who gets tack­led and feels a pop followed by immediate knee pain. The mnemonic “RICE” (rest, ice, compres­sion, elevation) is helpful in this immediate and early period to minimize local soft tissue edema and pain. If the sports medicine physician is pres­ent at a sporting event when an injury occurs, then an immediate physical examination can be performed to aid in forming a differential diagno­sis and guide further management.
Early
Early treatment involves establishing a denitive diagnosis and minimizing the sequelae of trauma, including joint stiffness and muscle atrophy. Additional testing is often required at this stage to help formulate both the diagnosis and the denitive treatment plan. An accurate diagnosis at this stage is critical, as important time- sensitive decisions need to be made (e.g., surgical versus nonsurgical management, early range of motion versus more prolonged immobilization, return­to- play timing). Nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a useful tool to manage pain and inammation during this period.
Treatment ofSports Injuries
Treatment of sports injuries follows an algorith­mic approach. The goals of treatment are to ini­tially reduce pain, inammation, swelling, and stiffness, followed by increasing strength and function to allow expeditious return to normal function and athletic activity. Treatment varies based on whether it is an acute traumatic injury versus a chronic overuse injury. For acute trau­matic injuries, treatment can be divided into three distinct but overlapping phases: immedi­ate, early, and late.
Late
The majority of sports injuries are successfully treated without surgery. Physical therapy is often necessary to allow patients to regain their pre­injury strength and range of motion. This reha­bilitation and recovery period can take weeks to months depending on the injury. Specic indica­tions for operative management vary depending on the specic injury pattern, as well as the ath­lete’s goals and expectations both on and off the athletic eld. Surgical intervention may involve traditional open techniques, arthroscopic tech­niques, or a combination of both.
8 Sports Medicine oftheHip andKnee
197

Chronic Overuse Injuries

In the treatment of chronic overuse injuries, rest is frequently employed in the form of activity modication. In general, any activity that exacer­bates symptoms should be avoided. The injured tissues must be allowed to rest in order to heal and resolve the inammatory process causing the symptoms. Often for the athlete, this involves temporary restriction from their sport.
During the period of activity modication, a variety of techniques can be helpful to further relieve pain and inammation in order to restore normal function. This can begin with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for symptom relief but not treating the underlying problem in most cases. Various modalities such as ice, heat, electrical stimulation, ultrasound, and massage can all be helpful in decreasing pain and swelling.
Although activity modication is the mainstay of treatment, a prolonged period of inactivity can result in muscular atrophy, joint stiffness, and overall de-conditioning. Denitive treatment for these injuries often involves a dedicated physical therapy program aimed at restoring the athlete’s strength and endurance required for a return to sport. Focus on the athlete’s biomechanics is also an essential component in treating overuse inju­ries to prevent recurrence. Attention to the specif­ics of the supporting structures is often helpful in this regard. Alignment problems are often identi­ed in this phase of treatment for lower extremity injuries. Fabrication of a shoe lift orthotic for a previously unrecognized limb length discrepancy or a medial longitudinal arch support for over­pronation can lead to a more successful return to activity. Sometimes video analysis of the activity is helpful to identify, correct, and prevent improper biomechanics.
Occasionally, overuse injuries do not respond to non-operative measures and surgical correc­tion is required. Conditions that are occasionally associated with failure of conservative treatment include lateral epicondylitis (“tennis elbow”), shoulder impingement, and patellar/Achilles ten­donitis. Conservative treatment is trialed for pro­longed periods—often 6months to 1year—before
resorting to surgical intervention. Rarely, stress fractures in high-risk areas (e.g., femoral neck) or those which fail to respond to adequate immobi­lization will require surgical intervention.

Common Pathologies Treated by Sports Medicine Specialists

Hip: Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI)

The hip is a ball-and-socket synovial joint where the ball (femoral head) articulates with the cup (acetabulum). In individuals with normal anat­omy, the femoral head is spherical and the ace­tabulum is hemispherical. In a disease process known as femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), commonly referred to as “hip impingement,” the femoral head and/or acetabulum has a shape that does not match each other, resulting in structural impingement.
Bony overgrowth at the femoral head–neck junction is referred to as a “cam lesion,” resulting in cam impingement. Cam lesions are most com­monly located at the anterosuperior aspect of the femoral head–neck junction and are more com­monly seen in males. With hip exion, adduction, and internal rotation (the so-called FADIR maneuver), the cam lesion impinges on the ace­tabular labrum, causing pain, labral tearing, and in severe cases leads to articular cartilage delami­nation. With repeated injury to the articular carti­lage over time, severe FAI can lead to osteoarthritis of the hip.
Bony overgrowth of the acetabular rim is referred to as a “pincer lesion” resulting in pincer impingement. This so-called acetabular over­coverage can be focal or global. Pincer lesions are most commonly located over the anterior or anterosuperior acetabular rim. When the hip is brought into FADIR, the pincer lesion on the acetabulum impinges on the femoral neck. Mixed lesions refer to the presence of both cam and pin­cer morphologies.
Patients typically present with insidious ante­rior or anterolateral hip pain although acute inju­ries can occur. Pain occurs with activity,
198
W. F. Postma and N. Apselo
especially exion activities such as squats and lunges although sitting pain is commonplace as the problem progresses as that position often brings the impinging surfaces together, thus com­pressing or stressing the labrum and underlying tear. The workhorse of the special test is the FADIR test maneuver for that reason as well.
Initial evaluation of FAI includes radiographs of the involved hip and pelvis (Fig.8.10). Specic radiographs for FAI include an AP view of the pelvis, frog-leg lateral view (hip abducted 45°), Dunn lateral view (hip exed 90° and abducted 20°), modied Dunn lateral view (hip exed 45° and abducted 20°), cross-table lateral view, and false prole view (pelvis rotated 60° toward the side being imaged). The Dunn and frog-leg lat­eral views are helpful in detecting femoral head– neck asphericity (cam lesions), while the cross-table lateral and false prole views are helpful for evaluating acetabular over-coverage (pincer lesions). The classic nding on an AP pel­vis view of a severe cam lesion is called a “pistol grip deformity.” Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip may be obtained to evaluate the labrum and articular cartilage (Fig.8.11).
The initial treatment for patients with FAI is conservative, starting with activity modication and physical therapy. For patients who fail con-
servative treatment, the rst-line surgical treat­ment is hip arthroscopy with specic procedures performed to address the patient’s specic pathol­ogy. Through an arthroscopic approach, cam and pincer lesions can be resected, and the labrum can be repaired, debrided, or reconstructed with allograft. Hip arthroscopy has made it possible to treat FAI through a minimally invasive approach. Prior to hip arthroscopy, the treatment involved open surgical hip dislocation (which is still required in some severe cases). For patients with end-stage osteoarthritis as a result of FAI, the treatment is total hip arthroplasty.

Knee: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury

The ACL is an intra-articular ligament in the knee that spans from the medial wall of the lat­eral femoral condyle to the middle of the inter­condylar area of the tibial plateau. The ACL prevents anterior translation and rotation of the tibia relative the femur. There are two distinct bundles of the ACL. The anteromedial (AM) bundle is tight in knee exion and primarily resists anterior translation of the tibia relative to the femur. In contrast, the posterolateral (PL)
Fig. 8.10 Left: AP pelvis X-ray. Right: Modied Dunn lateral X-ray of the left hip. The left hip in the images above demonstrates a cam lesion. The cam lesion (red arrow) is more evident on the modied Dunn lateral view,
as this hip positioning places the lesion located along the anterosuperior femoral head–neck junction perpendicular to the X-ray beam
8 Sports Medicine oftheHip andKnee
Fig. 8.11 Coronal MRI arthrogram demonstrating hip labral tearing (red arrow) in the setting of femoroacetabu­lar impingement
199
Fig. 8.12 Coronal MRI of the knee demonstrating the bone bruise pattern (white areas in the bone denoted by the arrows) seen after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. On T2 MRI, there is hyperintensity (indicative of a bone bruise) along the lateral femoral condyle and poste­rior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau
bundle is tight in knee extension and primarily resists rotation of the tibia relative to the femur.
ACL tears most commonly occur due to a non-contact pivoting injury (e.g., when an athlete plants their foot and twists to change direction). The ACL receives blood supply from branches of the middle geniculate artery. When the ACL is torn, this blood supply is disrupted leading to hemarthrosis or blood inside of the knee joint. Intra-articular ligament injuries (e.g., ACL and PCL) lead to hemarthrosis due to their presence inside of the joint, whereas extra-articular inju­ries (e.g., MCL, LCL) bleed outside of the knee joint capsule and do not form hemarthrosis.
On physical examination, the most sensitive test to detect an ACL tear is the Lachman test, while the most specic test is the pivot shift test. The Lachman test is performed by positioning the patient supine with the involved knee exed to 20–30°. The examiner stabilizes the femur, grasps the tibia, and attempts to translate the tibia anteriorly relative to the femur. A positive Lachman test is indicated by increased anterior tibial translation compared to the contralateral uninjured side. A positive Lachman test can be graded according to severity with grade 1 being 3–5mm anterior translation of the tibia, grade 2
being 5–10 mm translation, and grade 3 being >10mm translation.
The pivot shift test is performed with the patient supine and the examiner initially holding the involved extremity with the knee in exten­sion. A valgus force and axial load are applied to the knee along with slight internal rotation of the tibia, leaving the tibia in an internally subluxated position in the setting of ACL injury. The knee is then slowly brought into exion. A positive pivot shift is denoted by a palpable clunk or shift in the knee which occurs around 30–40° exion, corre­sponding to the subluxated lateral tibial plateau reducing onto the lateral femoral condyle. This reduction and shift occur at roughly 30–40° knee exion. The mechanism behind this shift is not fully understood but may be partially due to the iliotibial (IT) band transitioning from a knee extensor to a knee exor as the knee goes from a fully extended to exed position.
On MRI of knees with a torn ACL, there is a classic bone bruise pattern involving the mid­portion of the lateral femoral condyle and the pos­terior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau (Fig.8.12). These bone bruises occur secondary to the lateral femoral condyle impacting the lateral tibial pla-
200
Fig. 8.13 Sagittal MRI of the knee demonstrating ante­rior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear
teau during the pivot shift subluxation that occurs at the time of ACL injury. MRI also serves to con­rm the diagnosis of an ACL tear and identify concomitant injuries around the knee (e.g., menis­cal tears, collateral ligament tears) (Fig.8.13).
The gold-standard surgical treatment for ACL tears is an ACL reconstruction with tendon graft. The most common autograft sources are patellar tendon (with bone plugs from the patella and tibia, also known as a “bone–patellar tendon– bone” graft), hamstring tendon (semitendinosus/ gracilis), and quadriceps tendon. Alternatively, a variety of different allograft (cadaver) options are available. The surgery is performed with arthroscopic assistance, and the graft is passed through tunnels drilled through the anatomic footprints of the native ACL on the proximal tibia and lateral femoral condyle. Postoperatively, patients undergo functional physical rehabilita­tion with an emphasis on progressive range of motion, strengthening, and agility with the goal of returning to full sport roughly 9–12 months after surgery.
W. F. Postma and N. Apselo

Shoulder

Sports medicine surgeons treat a variety of shoul­der pathology, including glenohumeral instability (shoulder subluxations and dislocations), labral tears, and rotator cuff tears. For more detailed information, see Chap. 9.
Summary andConclusion
Sports medicine has evolved to encompass care of not only those participating in sports but of all active individuals. As patients continue to remain active into their older age, the sports medicine physician’s role has expanded to include every­one from children on youth soccer teams to octo­genarian pickleball players. The eld of sports medicine has signicantly advanced over the past several decades with continual innovation in arthroscopic surgery techniques and rehabilita­tion protocols. As our knowledge of the basic sci­ence of musculoskeletal tissues advances, so do our techniques for treating them when injured. Patients are now able to return to sports and activities after injury quicker and safer than before.

Further Reading

1. Miller MD, Thompson SR. DeLee, Drez, & Miller’s orthopaedic sports medicine: principles and practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2019.
2. Madden CC, Putukian M, McCarty EC, Young CC, editors. Netter’s sports medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2022.
3. Azar F.Orthopaedic knowledge update (OKU): sports medicine 6. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2020.
4. Miller MD. Operative techniques in sports medicine surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer;
2021.

The Shoulder

EvanMichaelson andBrentWiesel
9

Functional Anatomy

The shoulder girdle includes three bones (scap­ula, clavicle, and proximal humerus) (Fig.9.1), three joints (glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular), an additional articulation (scapulothoracic), and some 17 musculotendi­nous units. These individual elements function in a synchronous and interdependent manner in order to maximize the power and range of motion of the shoulder girdle. The clavicle is the sole bony link between the upper extremity and the axial skeleton.

The Glenohumeral Joint

The glenohumeral (GH) joint is the articulation of the proximal humeral epiphysis (ball) with the glenoid fossa (socket) of the scapula. This joint contributes to the majority of motion in the shoul­der girdle. As only 20–30% of the humeral head is in contact with the glenoid fossa at any point in the shoulder’s arc of motion and the radius of
E. Michaelson · B. Wiesel (*) Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
MedStar Orthopedic Institue, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA e-mail: Brent.B.Wiesel@gunet.georgetown.edu
curvature of the glenoid is greater than that of the humeral head, there is little inherent bony stabil­ity of the GH joint. The joint has often been com­pared to a golf ball sitting on a tee turned on its side. As a result, the soft tissues surrounding the joint are responsible for maintaining joint stabil­ity and congruity while still permitting the tre­mendous range of motion required of the GH joint. These soft tissue stabilizers include the joint capsule, glenohumeral ligaments, glenoid labrum, long head of the biceps tendon, and the rotator cuff musculature. The burden placed upon these soft tissues leads to the majority of degen­erative and traumatic conditions affecting the shoulder girdle.

The Glenohumeral Ligaments

The capsule of the shoulder is a specialized struc­ture that contains distinct thickenings referred to as ligaments (Fig. 9.2). The glenohumeral liga­ments are named for their origin from the glenoid rim. This ligamentous complex includes the superior glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), the middle glenohumeral ligament (MGHL), and the inferior glenohumeral ligament. These ligaments function as static stabilizers of the glenohumeral joint. The SGHL is the primary restraint to infe­rior translation and external rotation with the arm in adduction. The MGHL is the primary stabi­lizer to anterior translation with the arm in 45° of
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024 W. F. Postma et al. (eds.), Essentials of Orthopedic Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66215-7_9
201
202
AC joint
E. Michaelson and B. Wiesel
Fig. 9.1 Anterior view of the shoulder demonstrates the skeletal anatomy and two of the four articulations, the glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joints
Bicipital groove
Greater tubercle
Lesser tubercle
Acromion
Deltoid tuberosity
abduction. The inferior glenohumeral ligament complex includes an anterior band (AIGHL), posterior band (PIGHL), and an intervening sling or pouch. The inferior glenohumeral ligament complex becomes taut when the arm is abducted to 90°. In this position, the anterior band resists anterior translation with external rotation, and the posterior band resists posterior translation with internal rotation forces. The sling supports the humeral head.

The Labrum

Distal clavicle
Clavicle
Coracoid
Scapula
Glenoid
Glenohumeral joint
more triangular shaped and well dened and the inferior aspect of the labrum more rounded and less distinct. Common anatomic variations include a sublabral hole (foramen) or an absent labrum in the anterior-superior quadrant of the glenoid. The combination of a cord-like MGHL and absent anterosuperior labrum has been termed a Buford complex. It is important that the surgeon recognize variations in labral anatomy as inappropriate repair of a sublabral foramen or Buford complex will lead to signicant postop­erative stiffness.
The labrum is a brous structure of variable anat­omy that attaches to the rim of the glenoid carti­lage through a brocartilaginous zone, increasing the depth of the glenoid concavity by 50%. The labrum functions to increase the surface contact area with the humeral head; to act as a static sta­bilizer through a buttress effect; and to serve as an attachment site for the shoulder capsule, gle­nohumeral ligaments, and long head of the biceps tendon. The labrum has a variable cross-sectional anatomy, with the superior aspect of the labrum

The Rotator Interval

The rotator interval is the triangular region between the superior aspect of the subscapu­laris tendon and the anterior aspect of the supraspinatus tendon whose base is the cora­coid. The rotator interval includes a number of brous structures including the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), the SGHL, and the transverse humeral ligament. The coracohumeral liga­ment is the most signicant structure in the