Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:
Ординатура / Хирургия / Библиотека им академика М.И. Перельмана / Книга_5507_Библиотеки_им_академика_М_И_Перельмана.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
29.08.2026
Размер:
91 Мб
Скачать
136 Theory and Practice of Squint and Orthoptics
the fusional response. In general terms, the field of binocular fixation is more or less circular with a radius of about 45–50° from the fixation point in the primary position, except below when it is restricted on either side by the nose (Fig. 6.33C).
In a patient with paresis of an extraocular muscle, it may be helpful to record a patient's successive fields of binocular fixation on the same chart, thus making it easy to observe the clinical cause of the condition. As an example, Fig. 6.29 shows field of binocular fixation before and after operation (on the same chart) in a patient having 3rd nerve palsy of 2 years duration.
V. BIELSCHOWSKY'S PHENOMENON TEST
This test is performed for confirming the diagnosis of alternating sursumduction suspected on alternating cover test. The eye under cover deviates upwards and extorts. When the cover is removed, the eye slowly rotates downward to return to its previous position.
To perform the Bielschowsky phenomenon test, patient is asked to fixate a spotlight with one eye and the other eye is covered by an occluder. It is observed that the eye under cover moves up and extorts. Then, a filter is held before the fixating eye, keeping a watch on the eye under cover, which moves downward and intorts. This influence of changing the light stimulus in the
fixating eye on the deviation of the covered eye is known as the Bielschowsky phenomenon. Its presence confirms the diagnosis of alternating sursumduction made on alternate cover test.
VI. BIELSCHOWSKY'S HEAD TILT TEST
This test was originally recommended by Bielschowsky to differentiate between superior oblique palsy in one eye and superior rectus palsy in the contralateral side. The modified three-step technique of Bielschowsky's head tilt test is used for the diagnosis of paretic vertical recti and oblique muscles. For details, see pages 307–311.
SENSORY EVALUATION: ASSESSMENT FOR BINOCULAR CO-OPERATION AND SENSORY ANOMALIES
Normal binocular single vision consists of three grades: Simultaneous perception, fusion and stereopsis. It is maintained with central fixation and normal retinal correspondence.
There are variety of sensory adoptations that occur in response to clinical situations that disrupt binocular vision. The development of a specific type of sensory adaptation depends on when (age of the patients) the sensory anomaly occurred and the severity and type of binocular disruption.
Visually mature patients may develop following sensory adaptations:
Diplopia,
Confusion, or
Rivalry
Visually immature patients may develop following sensory adaptations:
Monofixation syndrome,
Anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC), or
Large regional suppression
Amblyopia, not actually a sensory adaptation may occur as a consequence of suppression. Sensory adaptations and amblyopia are described in details on pages 179–213.
Tests for binocular co-operation and sensory anomalies are as given below.
Fig. 6.29 Field of binocular fixation before and after ex-
traocular muscles surgery in a patient with third nerve palsy.
A. TESTS FOR FIXATION BEHAVIOUR
Fixation behaviour should be tested in each patient with strabismus having vision less than
Fig. 6.30 Types of fixation.
6/6 Snellen's. It can be tested with the help of a visuscope (see page 141) or fixation star of the ophthalmoscope. Patient is asked to cover one eye and fix the star with the other eye. Fixation may be centric (normal on the fovea) or eccentric (which may be unsteady, parafoveal, para­macular, centrocaecal, paracaecal or temporal; Fig. 6.30). The preliminary checking of fixation should be done without dilating the pupil, since this would be an obstacle to the pursuit of the rest of the diagnostic tests. However, in the end, pupils should be dilated and fixation test repeated along with the detailed fundus examination.
A steady central foveal fixation is a good prognostic sign. An unsteady but central foveal fixation indicates a possibility of good vision with conventional occlusion while a steady paramacular or peripheral eccentric fixation indicates a poor prognosis.
B. TESTS FOR THE STATE OF
RETINAL CORRESPONDENCE
Assessment for the state of retinal corres­pondence is necessary only in the presence of a constant manifest deviation. It is absolutely essential to know the state of monocular fixation, whether it is eccentric or central, so that this can be taken into account, when evaluating the results of the various tests.
In the absence of normal retinal corres­pondence (NRC), a patient with strabismus may develop anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC). ARC is an unstable secondary adaptation of sensory interaction between the two eyes that has developed under conditions of everyday stimulation and exists under these conditions.
137Evaluation of a Case of Strabismus and Orthoptic Instruments
The tests employed to evaluate state of retinal correspondence are described here in decreasing order of their similarity to normal circumstances.
1. Striated glass test (Bagolini test)
This test, performed with the Bagolini striated glasses, is closest to everyday visual conditions. The eyes are not dissociated during the test and can be observed by the examiner.
Bagolini's striated glasses (sometimes referred to as lenses) are in fact glass plates without refractive power. The glass plates contain extremely fine parallel striations on the surface. When looking through them, a spotlight appears as a fine streak of light perpendicular to the striations. The principle basically is the same as for the Maddox rod except that the patient can actually see through Bagolini's glasses. The glasses are mounted so that they can be inserted into a trial frame. Marks on the glass indicate the direction of the streak seen by the patient.
Procedure to perform the test (Fig. 6.31). Preferably the test should be performed in a room with subdued light. The test is performed for distance (6 metres) as well as near (33 cm). Patient is instructed to fixate on a spotlight. The striated glasses are placed in a trial frame with their axis oriented respectively at 45° and 135°, so that a normal subject would see two streaks of light forming a × intersecting at the spotlight (Fig. 6.31A). In a patient with strabismus, one of the following observations may be made:
1. A patient with a constant tropia having normal retinal correspondence (NRC) with no demonstrable suppression will experience diplopia, i.e. will see two spotlights each one crossed by one streak of light (Fig. 6.31B). According to the deviation, they will be seen either in crossed or in uncrossed diplopia.
2. In the presence of suppression of one eye, the patient will see the spotlight crossed by the line in front of the non-suppressing eye only (Fig. 6.31C).
3. A patient with harmonious anomalous retinal correspondence will see a perfect cross, as seen by a normal person (Fig. 6.31A), but the cover test will show the presence of a tropia.
4. Two streaks, but only one crossing through the centre of the light (the other one being
138 Theory and Practice of Squint and Orthoptics
displaced away from the light with a portion of it missing), indicate a suppression area with either normal retinal correspondence or unharmonious ARC (Fig. 6.31D).
5. In the presence of a small angle tropia, if the patient sees a perfect cross as seen by a normal person (Fig. 6.31A), and there is no movement on cover test, NRC is indicated (although there
Fig. 6.31 Bagolini's striated glass test (for explanation see text).
139Evaluation of a Case of Strabismus and Orthoptic Instruments
may be lack of bifoveal fixation). Parks records such cases as having 'unknown retinal correspondence'.
Advantages of Bagolini's test
This test is closest to the everyday visual
conditions, i.e. there is minimal interference with normal visual condition since the patient can see with both eyes.
It is a simple and easy test both for the patient
and the examiner. Even a child can describe exactly what he sees.
The test can be performed for any fixation
distance.
Since the eyes are not dissociated during the
test, these can be observed by the examiner.
Disadvantages
The test is only qualitative since the angle of
anomaly cannot be measured.
Small angles of anomaly may be over-
looked.
2. Diplopia test
To perform this test, patient's deviation is first determined objectively and the diplopia test is then performed under the same conditions (i.e. same fixation distance and refractive correction) to permit comparison. In the diplopia test, the patient fixates a spotlight on the centre of a tangent scale through a red filter and the deviating eye is uncovered. To begin with, each eye is covered alternately, so as to show him, that the fixation light and the tangent scale or screen is seen with one eye and red spot of light with the other eye. When both eyes are uncovered, the patient may see one or two lights as follows:
When the patient sees one red light and one
white light, it indicates either normal retinal correspondence or unharmonious ARC (if the separation of the images is not compatible with the angle of deviation).
When the patient sees only one red light, it
indicates suppression of the deviating eye.
When the patient sees a mixture of red and
white or a light red light, it indicates probability of harmonious ARC.
Advantages
The test is very simple and can be performed in children of average intelligence who are as young as 4 years of age.
Disadvantages
It is difficult to differentiate between fusion of the images and suppression of the deviating eye, since even in binocular vision, the fixating eye will be dominant and the image will tend to appear red.
3. Prism bar and red filter test
To perform this test, patient is asked to fixate a spotlight at 6 metres distance and a prism bar cover test is carried out with prism bar in front of the fixating eye, till the deviation is neutra­lized. The prism bar reading at this point equals the objective angle of squint. A red filter is then placed in front of the deviating eye and the patient is asked to describe what he/she sees. The various possibilities are as below:
1. Patient may suppress one eye, i.e. he/she does not see red light or a mixture of red and white light. This makes the test useless.
2.In the presence of normal retinal corres­pondence (i.e. when the foveae have a common visual direction), the patient may see the light as a blend of red and white.
3. In the presence of ARC, i.e. when the foveae have different visual directions, the patient will see two lights, a white and a red one. In a patient with esodeviation, the diplopia will be crossed and with exodeviation uncrossed (paradoxical diplopia).
4.To measure the angle of anomaly, in the presence of ARC, the prism bar is now moved slowly (decreasing the base-out strength for esodeviations or the base-in strength in exodeviations) until the diplopia disappears or until the type of diplopia is reversed. The prism bar value at this point equals the subjective angle of squint. The difference between the objective and subjective angles represents the angle of anomaly.
4. Synoptophore test
To detect ARC by synoptophore method, objective and subjective angles of the squint are measured using dissimilar slides (e.g. lion and the cage) as described on page 118, respectively, and the results are interpreted as below:
1. If the objective and subjective angles of the
squint coincide, normal retinal correspondence (NRC) is present.
140 Theory and Practice of Squint and Orthoptics
2. If the objective angle is greater than subjective angle, the anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) is present; and the difference between these angles is called the angle of anomaly, when the angle of anomaly is equal to the objective angle, i.e. when subjective angle is zero, the ARC is harmonious. In unharmonious ARC, angle of anomaly is smaller than the objective angle.
5. Worth's four-dot test
For this test, patient wears red-green goggles with red lens in front of the right eye and green lens in front of the left eye and views a box with four lights—one red, two green and one white (Fig. 6.32A). Since the lights are of the colours complementary to those of the filters before the patient's eye, he/she can see the red light only through the red filter and the two green lights only through the green filter. The white light can be seen with both eyes.
Depending upon the patient's observation, the
results are interpreted as below:
1. If the patient sees all the four lights (one red, two green and one white or red or green or mixture of red and green) in the absence of manifest squint, he/she has normal binocular single vision (Fig. 6.32A).
2. With abnormal retinal correspondence (ARC), patient sees all the four lights as above even in the presence of a manifest squint (Fig. 6.32B).
3. If the patient sees only two red lights, he/she has left suppression (Fig. 6.32C).
4. If the patient sees only three green lights, he/ she has right suppression (Fig. 6.32D).
5. When the patient sees three green lights and two red lights alternately, it indicates presence of alternating suppression.
6.If the patient sees five lights (2 red and 3 green), he has diplopia (Fig. 6.32E).
6. Bielschowsky’s after image test
In this test, patient's right fovea is stimulated with a vertical bright light and left fovea with a horizontal bright light (Fig. 6.33A) for 15 seconds each and the patient is asked to draw the position of after images. Perception of the after images is easiest, when the patient closes his/ her eyes or when he/she looks at a blank screen.
Fig. 6.32 Worth's four-dot test.
The results are interpreted as below:
1. A patient with normal retinal corres­pondence will draw a cross (Fig. 6.33B).
2. A right esotropic patient with ARC will draw
vertical image to the left of horizontal image (Fig. 6.33C).
3. A right exotropic patient with ARC will draw
vertical image to the right of horizontal (Fig. 6.33D).
4. A response showing the images in a crossed
position in exotropia (Fig. 6.33E) and in an uncrossed position in esotropia (Fig. 6.33F) indicates the presence of paradoxic diplopia in the presence of ARC with eccentric fixation.
5. The patient may draw only vertical image (in
left suppression) or only horizontal image (in right suppression). In alternate suppression, patient sees vertical and horizontal lines alternately.
Disadvantages
1. The after image test is the most unphysiologic
of all the tests for ARC, since an after image and a normal visual stimulation are so different that they cannot even be compared.
141Evaluation of a Case of Strabismus and Orthoptic Instruments
Fig. 6.33 Bielschowsky's after image test (for explanation, see text).
2. Small children do not understand what they should observe.
7. Cupper's binocular visuscope test
In this test, the patient sits 5 metres away from a Maddox scale and is asked to fixate the light on the centre of scale with fixing eye and the examiner looks the images of the visuscope on
the retina of patient's deviated eye. Since it may be difficult for the examiner to look through the visuscope without blocking the patient's view of the fixation object, i.e. the patient is asked to fixate through a plane mirror or prism (which changes the direction of fixation) (Fig. 6.34A).
The examiner projects the star of the visuscope
on the patient's fovea and asks the patient to
142 Theory and Practice of Squint and Orthoptics
tell its position on the Maddox scale in respect to the central fixation light. The results are interpreted as below:
1. In the presence of normal retinal correspon­dence, the patient sees star superimposed on the fixation light (Fig. 6.34B).
2. In the presence of ARC, patient sees star to the right or left of the fixation light depending upon the deviation. The number on the Maddox scale coinciding with the star gives the angle of anomaly (Fig. 6.34C).
After the presence of ARC is established, the examiner moves the visuscope until the star and the fixation light coincide, and at this point, the examiner notes the position of the star on the patient's retina. This peripheral point on the retina of the patient's deviated eye has acquired a common visual direction with the fovea of the dominant eye. This point is not always the same as the one used for eccentric fixation. In other words, the angle of anomaly is not always identical with the distance between the fovea and the retinal point used for fixation.
Fig. 6.34 Cupper's binocular visuscope test (for explanation, see text).
143Evaluation of a Case of Strabismus and Orthoptic Instruments
Disadvantages
The binocular visuscope test is difficult to perform with young children.
Evaluation of tests for retinal correspondence
A great disparity between the results of various tests performed for evaluation of state of retinal correspondence is reported in the literature. In general, as stated earlier, the tests that interfere least with the ordinary conditions of seeing (e.g. Bagolini's test) show more ARC response and the tests which cause most dissociating conditions (e.g. after image test) show less ARC response.
C. ASSESSMENT FOR GRADES OF BINOCULAR SINGLE VISION
Assessment for grades of binocular single vision (BSV) is essential, since its achievement is the ultimate goal in the management of a case with strabismus. As stated earlier, the three grades of BSV include simultaneous perception (first grade), fusion (second grade) and stereopsis (third grade). Various tests employed to assess the state of BSV have been described on page 61.
2. Exercises to improve the relative convergence
or relative accommodation.
3. Anti-suppression exercises.
4. Amblyopia therapy.
Working principle of orthoptic instruments
Working of most orthoptic instruments is based on the fact that they either allow or detect the dissociation of fusion of binocular vision.
The common modes by which an orthoptic instrument can cause dissociation of two eyes are as follows:
1. Use of septum so that each eye sees the
different half of the field, as in Maddox wing, diploscope, Remy separator, cheiroscope and pigeon-cantonnet stereoscope.
2. Use of two tubes, one in front of each eye as
in synoptophore.
3. Use of red and green complimentary glasses
one in front of each eye.
4. Use of polaroid glasses.
5. Use of striations as in Bagolini's glasses.
6. Use of cylindrical lenses as in Maddox rod.
D. TESTS TO ASSESS SUPPRESSION AND AMBLYOPIA
See pages 183 and 198.

ORTHOPTIC INSTRUMENTS

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Uses
The orthoptic instruments are required for diagnostic, therapeutic or both purposes.
A. Diagnostic uses of orthoptic instruments
1. Measurement of angle of deviation (subjective and objective).
2. Measurement of range of fusion.
3.Measurement of accommodative conver­gence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio.
4. To know the sensory status of binocular vision and to detect the sensory anomalies such as suppression, amblyopia and ARC.
5. To evaluate for stereoacuity.
6.To evaluate the motor status of binocular vision.
B. Therapeutic uses of orthoptic instruments
1. Exercises to improve the fusional range.
Types of orthoptic instruments
Conventional, i.e. non-computerised orthoptic
equipment, and
Computerised orthoptic programs see
page 159.
CONVENTIONAL (NON-COMPUTERISED) ORTHOPTIC INSTRUMENTS
Like any other branch of science, the science of orthoptic and strabismus is also advancing and changing fast. With time, certain instruments have become obsolete and some have become less important. For example, even synoptophore is no more considered an essential equipment for orthoptic set-up. However, its persence do adds grace to the orthoptic clinic. Description of certain instruments which are used only for diagnostic purposes has been given along with the diagnostic tests under the evaluation of a case of strabismus. A few other important orthoptic instruments which have not been described elsewhere will be described in this section. Orthoptic instru­ments can be grouped as follows:
144 Theory and Practice of Squint and Orthoptics
I. Essential orthoptic instruments
The bare minimum equipment required for the clinical work-up of a patient with strabismus are:
1. A refraction trial set with prism of 1–8 D
2. Snellen's vision chart and single letter E-chart.
3. Prism bars, horizontal and vertical (see page
124)
4. Loose prism set
5. Fixation targets, for near and distance
6. Occluders
7. Bagolini's striated lenses (see page 137)
8. Red and green goggles
9. Maddox rods (see page 116)
10. Direct ophthalmoscope
11. Transparent foot ruler
II. Desirable orthoptic instruments
These instruments, when present, add grace and completeness to the orthoptic clinic. These include:
1. Synoptophore
2. Random dot stereo test (see page 91)
3. Hess screen (see page 130)
4. RAF rule (see page 125)
5. Worth four dot test (see page 140)
6. Indirect ophthalmoscope
7. Spielman’s occluder
III. Additional orthoptic instruments
There is no limit to additional orthoptic instruments. Additional orthoptic instruments can be grouped as below.
Priority additional orthoptic instruments
1. Haidinger brushes and after images attachment for synoptophore.
2. Teller acuity cards with screen
3. Optokinetic nystagmus drum
4. VER and electronystagmography
5. System perimeter
6. Camera for documentation
Non-priority additional orthoptic instruments
1. Livingston binocular gauge
2. Remy separator
3. Reading bars
4. Cheiroscope
5. Neutral density filters and graded density bar
6. Maddox wing (see page 118)
IV. Orthoptic instruments not used presently
1. Bishop-Harman diaphragm
2. Stereoscope (Holmes, Keystone)
3. Projectoscope
4. Visuscope
5. Euthyscope
6. Co-ordinator
7. CAM vision stimulator
8. Pigeon-Cantonnet stereoscope
9. Tibbs binocular trainer
10. Diploscope
SYNOPTOPHORE
Synoptophore (major amblyoscope) is a haploscopic device. Though not an essential instrument but its presence is most desirable in an orthoptic clinic. It essentially consists of two tubes, having a right-angled bend, mounted on a base having a chin rest and a forehead rest (Fig. 6.35). Each tube contains a light source for illumination of slides and a slide carrier at the outer end, a reflecting mirror at the right-angled bend and an eyepiece of +6.5D at the inner end (Fig. 6.36). The two tubes can be converged, diverged and moved vertically separately or together by means of knobs. The tubes can also be adjusted to the patient's interpupillary distance. Each slide carrier can be rotated to adjust for any torsion. The horizontal, vertical and torsional positions of each tube with regard to normal zero position can be read on scales in either degrees or prism dioptres.
The graduations from the zero mark inward represent base-out prisms or degrees of convergence (+), while those from the zero mark
Fig. 6.35 Synoptophore.
Fig. 6.36 Optical principle of synoptophore.
outward represent base-in prisms or degrees of divergence (–).
Light switches permit the simultaneous or alternate illumination of the tubes, useful for performing the cover tests.
Synoptophore slides
The pair of slides used to perform various diagnostic and therapeutic purposes include the following.
1. Simultaneous perception slides. Two dissimilar slides, such as one having picture of a bird and the other of the cage, constitute a pair of simultaneous perception slides (Fig. 6.37A). Each slide is presented separately to each eye. Ideally, the pictures should not have overlapping contour since this will induce suppression. These slides are graded by their size into three groups:
145Evaluation of a Case of Strabismus and Orthoptic Instruments
a. Simultaneous foveal perception (SFP) slides. This
pair consists of small sized pictures, the images of which do not exceed the size of the fovea.
b. Simultaneous macular perception (SMP)
slides. The pictures in this pair of slides are slightly larger than those on the SFP slides.
c. Simultaneous paramacular perception (SPP) slides.
These slides have the largest pictures and form
images that extend into paramacular areas. (Note: As a routine, if possible, the smallest slides should be used. However, the larger slides may be required in the presence of suppression or amblyopia).
2. Fusion slides. Fusion slides consist of two similar pictures, each of which is incomplete in one small detail. For example, there are two rabbits each lacking either a tail or a bunch of flowers. If fusion is present, one complete rabbit with tail and holding a bunch of flowers will be seen (Fig. 6.37B). In the presence of suppression, either tail or bunch of flowers will be missing in the respective eye.
Grading.The fusion slides are also graded
according to the size in the same way as the simultaneous perception slides.
3. Stereoscopic slides. Stereoscopic slides consist of two pictures of the same object which have been taken from slightly different angles, i.e. the picture for one eye is in part dissimilar from that for the other eye. These dissimilar parts are imaged on disparate retinal areas in the two eyes and, when the entire picture is fused, the
Fig. 6.37 Synoptophore slides for simultaneous perception (A), fusion (B) and stereopsis (C).