Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
294
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar et al.
Classication ofBreast Asymmetry
Mammary asymmetry has been reported since 1950, when Maliniac (1950) divided breast asymmetries into four categories: asymmetry with bilateral hypertrophy, hypertrophy on one side and amastia or hypomastia on the other, hypertrophy on one side and a normal size on the other, amastia or hypomastia on one side and normal breast size on the other. Pitanguy etal. (1973, 1977) referred to asymmetri­cal breasts and the physical repercussions to body contouring and to the respiratory system. Other authors have referred to this, such as Broadbent and Woolf (1978) and Sepúlveda (1981). Later, Juri (1989) presented a simplied classication of asymmetrical breasts, dividing them into only three grades. More recently, Jales (2004) and Karim etal. (2009) wrote reports on the asymmetry of the breasts and proposed specic classications. Given that breast asymmetry is very common and is important in plastic surgery, it is divided (Avelar 1989, 2018a) into two major categories in accordance with what is helpful to know for surgical correction: con­genital and acquired.
Congenital
(a) Without a chest deformity
1. Bilateral hypertrophy (Figs.17.1, 17.2, 17.4 and 17.5).
2. Hypertrophy in one breast and normal size for the other.
3. Hypertrophy in one breast and hypomastia in the other (Fig.17.3).
4. Hypertrophy in one breast and ptosis in the other.
5. Bilateral hypomastia.
6. Hypomastia in one breast and normal size for the other.
7. Asymmetrical breasts with bilateral ptosis (Fig.17.8).
(b) With a chest deformity
1. Bilateral hypertrophy.
2. Hypertrophy and normal size.
3. Hypertrophy and hypomastia.
4. Bilateral hypomastia.
5. Hypomastia and normal size.
(c) Without nipple deformity
1. Atelia and normal size.
2. Amastia and normal size.
3. Amastia and hypomastia.
4. Polythelia.
5. Polymastia.
ab
cd
17 Classication and Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts to Achieve a Balance…
https://t.me/medicina_free
295
Fig. 17.8 Asymmetry of the breasts presenting severe ptoses with unilateral hypertrophy in a 19-year-old patient. Photos a and c—preoperative; photos b and d after reduction mastoplasty on the left side and mastopexy on right one
(d) With nipple deformity
1. Atelia and normal size.
2. Amastia and normal size.
3. Amastia and hypomastia.
4. Polythelia.
5. Polymastia.
296
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar et al.
Acquired
(a) Traumatic
1. Burns.
2. Human and animal bite.
(b) Iatrogenic
1. After mastectomy for resection of breast cancer.
2. Secondary to augmentation mastoplasty.
3. Secondary to reduction mastoplasty.
Method
Mastoplasty for the correction of asymmetrical breasts is always a challenge because during the operation, the surgeon must perform a one approach on one side and another on the other. It has been much more complex than a standard aesthetic
cd
Fig. 17.9 Asymmetry of the breasts presenting asymmetric ptoses in a 21-year-old patient. Photos a and c—preoperative; photos b and d after bilateral mastopexy with inverted T and periareolar
incision for reparation of asymmetric nipple-areolar complex
17 Classication and Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts to Achieve a Balance…
https://t.me/medicina_free
surgery because surgeons need to achieve an appropriate balance among both breasts and keep them in harmony with the chest to improve body contouring (Fig.17.9).
297
Surgical Planning
Surgical planning is an essential step before any operation in plastic surgery, but for the correction of asymmetry in the breasts, it is even more important because of the different approaches necessary for this surgery. When a patient mentions an evident asymmetry between their two breasts, surgical planning will usually require two operations. A good example is when a patient presents with hypertrophy on one side and hypomastia on the other, in which case the surgical plan must include reduction mastoplasty on one breast and augmentation mastoplasty using an implant on the other (Fig.17.3). However, when a patient presents with bilateral hypertrophy with noticeable asymmetry, surgical planning must be directed to reduce both sides for the reparation of the different sizes of the breasts (Figs.17.1, 17.2, 17.4 and 17.5). Surgical planning for this surgery is much more complex because bilateral hypertro­phic breasts featuring severe asymmetry may require specic procedures to achieve aesthetic bilateral balance (Figs.17.1 and 17.4).
Surgical Demarcations
The surgeon should carry out premarking at their ofce or at the hospital before medication because at this time, the patient is awake and may follow the prelimi­nary demarcation (Avelar 1989, 2018c). Also at this time, some references points are drawn on both breasts, as recommended by Erfon etal. (2018). In the case of mammary hypertrophy on one side, add a landmark for the reference points for reduction mastoplasty (Avelar 2018b). Depending on the abnormality in the oppo­site breast, appropriate premarkings are made. Nevertheless, when the patient is in operating room, the nal surgical markings are made according to the surgeon’s technique.
The Operation
In all cases of aesthetic breast surgery, the correction of deformities requires a pre­vious clinical evaluation, meticulous surgical planning, and preliminary demarca­tions, as mentioned in the preceding subsection. In most cases of asymmetric breast ptosis, surgeons should create a medial dermogladular ap with a superior pedicle
298
ac
b
a cb
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar et al.
because it is versatile in remodeling the breasts (Figs. 17.10, 17.11 and 17.12) (Avelar 1980; Sinder 2018).
Asymmetry with breast hypertrophy on both sides requires bilateral reduction mastoplasty (Figs.17.1, 17.2, 17.4 and 17.5). Although the purpose of this chapter is not to describe the operation, my preference is to perform breast reduction for the correction of asymmetry by using Pitanguy’s technique because it is easy to adapt for each case of deformity (Figs. 17.13, 17.14 and 17.15) (Pitanguy 1959,
1961, 1967).
Also, the correction of asymmetry in a hypertrophic breast has been well described by Paulino Costa et al. (2018), Caldeira et al. (2018), and Martire Jr (2018); Matire used his versatile “L” mastoplasty technique.
When a patient presents with hypertrophy in only one breast, unilateral reduction mastoplasty must be performed. However, the most complex asymmetries feature hypomastia in one breast and hypertrophy in the other (Fig. 17.3). The surgical
d
Fig. 17.10 Sequential diagrams to demonstrate mastopexy by creation of a medial glandular ap with superior pedicle (Avelar 1980). Drawing (a)—after resection of skin on inferior pole of the breast two parallel incisions are done; (b, c) the inferior pole of the glandular ap is pulled for­ward; (d) after backwards rotation, similar to a pendulum, it is sutured to the muscle on chest wall
Fig. 17.11 Preoperative photos to demonstrate creation, rotation, and suture of the medial glandu­lar ap with superior pedicle. Photo (a)—the mammary dermal ap is raised and pulled forward; (b) the ap is already rotated backward supported by borders; (c) after suture of the end of the dermal glandular ap to the muscle on the chest
ab
17 Classication and Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts to Achieve a Balance…
https://t.me/medicina_free
c d
299
Fig. 17.12 Sequential photos during mastopexy with the creation of a medial dermal glandular ap with superior pedicle on the right breast. Photo (a) the mammary dermal ap is being incised; (b) the ap is pulled forward; (c) the ap is already rotated backward being saturated on the mus­cles of the chest wall; (d) the nal suture of the cutaneous covering of the right breast
planning must be carried out with reduction mastoplasty on one side and augmenta­tion mastoplasty on the opposite breast. Some patients have mentioned that since the age of 10 years, they have had a hyperdeveloped breast on one side and an underdeveloped breast on the other. The main purpose of surgery in this case is to correct the severe imbalance of the body contour, which can come with severe phys­ical and psychological repercussions. There is very wide variation among breasts, nipples, and chest deformities according to the classication described above (Avelar 1989). Because of this immense variety of congenital anomalies, surgical planning is key to achieving balance between the breasts and with the chest (Avelar
2018c). The most frequent asymmetry of the breasts is ptosis associated with
300
bc
a b
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 17.13 Modications on Pitanguy’s technique to reduce the length of the horizontal scars on submammary fold during reduction mastoplasty. Scheme (a) and preoperative photo (b), demon­strate Avelar’s contribution: points A,B, C, D, and E are demarcate according to original technique. Points A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1 are the references to reduce the scar
J. M. Avelar et al.
a
d
Fig. 17.14 Scheme and preoperative photos to demonstrate Pitanguy’s technique for glandular resection during mastoplasty for correction of asymmetric breasts. Drawing (a) a medial segment is demarcated; (b) photos shows the amount of mammary tissue to be resected; (c) it is being resected with knife; (d) the segment already resected to demonstrate the shape of the glandular resected
ab
17 Classication and Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts to Achieve a Balance…
https://t.me/medicina_free
c
Fig. 17.15 Schemes and preoperative photo showing the creation of the “third” Pitanguy’s pedicle during reduction mastoplasty with purpose to correct asymmetric breasts. Scheme (a) and photo (b) one can see the “third” pedicle from bottom; (c) scheme on prole view
301
accidity, which requires bilateral mastopexy with the removal of some of the mam­mary tissue to achieve a good balance between the two breasts (Figs.17.6, 17.8 and
17.9). There are other congenital deformities, polymastia or polythelia, that become
evident only during puberty, when the breasts start to develop. Patients bring up these abnormalities in consultation, but they are usually not aware of them unless they experience monthly alterations related to menstruation.
Acquired asymmetry of the breasts is a special eld in which patients’ normal organs incur damage, bringing imbalance to the body contour with physical and psychological repercussions. Deformities of the breast caused by burns to the chest are very common after accidents in infancy or adolescence (Avelar 2018a). As the mammary glands originate and develop from the dermis (Pitanguy etal. 1973), they may be damaged when the trauma impacts the chest wall. Surgeons must be very careful when a child presents with burns on their chest near the nipple–areolar com­plex (NAC).
During puberty, when physical development makes signicant alterations to the body, the growing breast may show some asymmetry, which requires repair or reconstruction (Avelar 2018a). Just as some patients’ ear deformities are caused by burns, some patients’ breast abnormalities are caused by burns. Other traumas may also damage the breast, partially or totally. Human/animal bites are quite unusual causes, but when they occur, they may have severe consequences.
302
https://t.me/medicina_free
Nowadays, breast cancer is a substantial social and medical problem and is becoming more and more frequent. When unilateral or bilateral mastectomy is per­formed, severe wide deformities often occur. Neither the pathological conditions nor the treatment is within the scope of this chapter, except to demonstrate the imbalance of the body contours caused by mastectomy (Avelar 2018a). Therefore, in this chapter, the problem is limited to including one example of the causes of asymmetrical breasts.
J. M. Avelar et al.
Unsatisfactory Surgical Results
As the operation to repair asymmetrical breasts is performed, the most feared result is not achieving perfect bilateral harmony between the two sides because the ana­tomical mammary structures of each breast don’t have a uniform constitution (Avelar 2000b, 2018d). Such a situation may be the main reason for litigation between patients and plastic surgeons. When the operation performed on one side is a reduction mastoplasty and on the other requires the implantation of a silicone prosthesis, achieving a high level of bilateral symmetry is quite difcult but possible (Figs.17.3 and 17.8). Even when mastopexy is performed on both sides and when patients then have asymmetry, maintaining perfect symmetry is a constant chal­lenge. Because there many patients with several kinds of asymmetries, each patient must be informed of the limits of the operation and those limited must be specied in the documents on informed consent (Avelar 2000a, b, c).
Discussion
The theme of breast asymmetry is important in the study of the pathological condi­tions of aesthetic breast surgery. Although it is recommended to delay surgical treat­ment until after puberty, quite often the problem originated at birth or during childhood (Figs.17.3 and 17.8). Besides the asymmetric breasts presented in the classication in this chapter, tuberous breasts quite often exhibit deformities associ­ated with asymmetry, as described by Ribeiro etal. (Ribeiro etal. 2018).
The asymmetry concerns not only the volume of breast tissue but also the mam­mary gland’s structure, the thickness of the skin, the nipple–areola complex, and the thoracic wall (Figs.17.6, 17.8 and 17.9) (Avelar 1989, 2000a, b, c). A broad clas­sication of breast deformities has been presented, addressing the diverse patho­logical conditions and the appropriate age for surgery. Each patient must be treated according to the deformity in their breast(s). For this reason, clinical evaluation and surgical planning are crucial steps to carry out before the operation (Avelar 2018c).
Breast asymmetry is common and represents a problem for many patients (Avelar
2018a). Although most of them are looking for a mastoplasty procedure without any
reference to some sort of asymmetry in their breasts, it may be solved during
17 Classication and Correction of Asymmetrical Breasts to Achieve a Balance…
https://t.me/medicina_free
303
surgery. Even if they don’t mention it before mastoplasty, any asymmetry after the operation may cause dissatisfaction (Avelar 2000a, b, 2018d). For this reason, ade­quate evaluation is crucial during consultation as surgery is planned and during surgical demarcation. However, the surgical technique isn’t described in this chap­ter, because each deformity requires a specic approach to solve the asymmetry, but we did add a few words to state our preference for solving this problem. Since the beginning of our practice, we have sought to reduce the nal scar on the submam­mary folds without causing any damage to the shape of the breasts. One should not insist on prioritizing small scars over the shape, harmony, and symmetry of the breasts. We employ Pitanguy’s (1959) technique with our own contribution in order to obtain a short horizontal scar while adapting to the different sizes of asymmetric breasts.
Conclusions
From birth until puberty, the breasts remain in a latency stage. When a young patient presents with asymmetric nipples or breasts, the surgeon must inform their parent or guardian about the indication for surgical correction. Each deformity may be treated according to its specic problem. The most frequent abnormality is bilateral hyper­trophy with asymmetry (Figs.17.1, 17.2, 17.4 and 17.5). Therefore, surgical plan­ning and surgical marking are essential to achieving good results with a good balance between the two breasts.
References
Avelar J (1980) Creation of a Dermal-Adipose-Glandular Flap with Superior Pedicle on
Mastopexy with or without Silicone Prosthesis Inclusion (Criação de um Retalho Dermo-
Adipose- Glandular com Pedículo Superior nas Mastopexias com ou sem Inclusão de Silicone).
Brazilian Symposium on Breast Surgery organized by Psillakis and Avelar, Sponsored by
Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery– Regional São Paulo– August. São Paulo Avelar J (1986) Reduction Mastoplasty Associated with Liposuction (Lipoaspiração Associada
a Mastoplastia Redutora). In Liposuction (Lipoaspiração). Ed by Avelar JM and Illouz
YG.Editora Hipócrates, São Paulo; 25-148-151 Avelar JM (1989) Breast asymmetry (Assimetria Mamária). In: Plastic Surgery in Infancy (Cirurgia
Plástica na Infância). Ed. by Avelar JM, Ed. Hipocrates, vol 2. São Paulo, pp413–418 Avelar JM (1993) Reduction Mastoplasty under local Anesthesia (Mastoplastia Redutora sob
Anestesia Local). In: Loco-Regional Anesthesia on Aesthetic Surgery —(Anestesia Loco-
Regional em Cirurgia Estética), ed. by Avelar JM vol 29. São Paulo, Editora Hipócrates,
pp244–260 Avelar JM (2000a) Body Asymmetry (Assimetria Corporal) in: Plastic Surgery– Obligation of
Means Not Obligation of Results (Cirurgia Plástica Obrigação de Meio e não Obrigação de Fim
ou de Resultado, ed. By Juarez M.Avelar, Ed. Hipócrates São Paulo 8-267-296 Avelar JM (2000b) Results in Plastic Surgery (Resultados em Cirurgia Plástica). in: Plastic
Surgery – Obligation of Means Not Obligation of Results (Cirurgia Plástica Obrigação de
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025