Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
260
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 14.13 Surgical specimen weighing 7kg and measuring 70×50cm
I. N. Stocchero et al.
Complications
The most frequent complication is epidermolysis. Some small wound dehiscence may occur. Rarely, supercial ecchymosis in minimal areas may appear (Fig.14.14).
Discussion
This hybrid manner of operating was conceived to save surgical time and to reduce bleeding. These are the prerequisites for its indication.
It is also fundamental to not expect rened remodeling in breast surgeries, nor use the technique with great undermining of tissues, since both these situations call for traditional, more complex techniques.
14 The Excision-Suture Tactic: AQuick andLow Bleeding Option forTissue Resection
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 14.14 Fleur-de-lis suture, 30days PO
261
However, with correct training and engagement of the surgical team, excellent results may be achieved, which will expand the job market with these procedures as part of the range of options.
Key Points oftheChapter
Adequate indication for the surgery. Knowing that the patient has had the necessary level of understanding and clarication, especially when the primary objective of the procedure is aesthetic
In cases where indication for the surgery was based on health needs, it is always easier for the patient to accept a revision surgery at a later stage.
Tips forBetter Results
Make the patient a partner in the quest for the best possible result.
Whenever possible, wait for the best time to perform the surgery, for example, until an additional weight loss may be achieved.
Be safe and honest when proposing the procedure. Make sure that all informa­tion was claried and understood by the patient.
Reference
Stocchero IN (2003) The Ex-suture: a nonbleeding excision for hair transplantation, Plast Reconstr
Surg; 111(5):1176.
Part III
https://t.me/medicina_free
Behavior of Breast Surgery Improving
Body Contouring
Chapter 15
https://t.me/medicina_free
Reduction Mammoplasty withLower Pedicle
RicardoCavalcantiRibeiro, AlineGuimarãesGomesde Sousa, andLuisFernandezde Córdova
Abstract Reducing mammoplasty with the use of an areolate lower pedicle is
among the current techniques of breast reduction and, when well indicated, offers incalculable benets for both the patient and the surgeon, due to the reduction of complications. The technique basically consists in the preparation of a dermo-adi­pose inferior pedicle ap containing the areola-papillary complex (CAP) to main­tain its vascularization, therefore being considered a technique of choice in the treatment of large gigantomastias or mammary hypertrophy. Postoperative care is not very different from the guidelines given to patients submitted to other reduction mammoplasty techniques. Different studies have shown that there are no signicant differences between reducing mammoplasty by other techniques and mammoplasty with lower pedicle elaboration, in terms of complications such as hematoma, seroma, necrosis, and infections. The authors indicate the technique mainly in young patients with reproductive expectations after surgery, due to the conservation of the glandular anatomy and the preservation of its continuity with the CAP.
Keywords Breast reduction · Lower pedicle · Breast hypertrophy · Gigantomastia
R. C. Ribeiro (*) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil e-mail: rribeiro@centroin.net.br
A. G. G. de Sousa Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L. F. de Córdova Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive, Surgery Global Plastic Surgery State of México, México
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_15
265© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
266
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Synopsis
Reducing mammoplasty with the use of an areolate lower pedicle is among the cur­rent techniques of breast reduction and, when well indicated, offers incalculable benets for both the patient and the surgeon, due to the reduction of complications. The technique basically consists in the preparation of a dermo-adipose inferior ped­icle ap containing the nipple-areola complex (NAC) to maintain its vasculariza­tion, therefore being considered a technique of choice in the treatment of large gigantomastias or mammary hypertrophy. Postoperative care is not very different from the guidelines given to patients submitted to other reduction mammoplasty techniques. Different studies [1–33] have shown that there are no signicant differ­ences between reducing mammoplasty by other techniques and mammoplasty with lower pedicle elaboration, in terms of complications such as hematoma, seroma, necrosis, and infections. The authors indicate the technique mainly in young patients with reproductive expectations after surgery, due to the conservation of the glandu­lar anatomy and the preservation of its continuity with the CAP.
Surgical Indication
The areolate ap is usually indicated in hypertrophy and gigantomastia, being very useful in these patients when they present a distance between point A and the areola of 8cm or more, sometimes reaching 20cm. In addition, due to the consistency of the breasts, present most often, more glandular component should be suspected than fat. In this situation, the risk of vascular complications increases when superior pedicle techniques are used, mainly due to the reduction of venous return. It is noto­rious that some authors in the mentioned situation prefer to opt for the autograft of the CAP, which may be dispensable with the lower dermo-adipose pedicle. Thus, the viability of the complex is protected, presenting low rates of vascular impairment.
Surgical Technique
After a thorough preoperative evaluation, the patient is marked standing and explained that the resulting scar will usually be shaped like an inverted T.Later, within the demarcation, the design of the lower pedicle is made with width ranging from 7 to 10cm, which ensures the conservation of the vessels that feed it.
The authors prefer to perform the marking with the patient awake, rather than anesthetized, due to the ease of observation of breast dynamics in various positions (Fig.15.1).
Under general anesthesia, the patient is positioned with open arms and may remain semised or not during surgery. The procedure begins with peri-areolar
15 Reduction Mammoplasty withLower Pedicle
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 15.1 Preoperative markings. Points A, B, and C are established and the ap is designed
267
decortication, as well as the entire lower cutaneous extension of the pedicle terri­tory. A triangle-shaped upper segment formed by the AB, AC, and CB points is dissected to the muscular plane, ne-tuning the rest in the upper and lateral sectors (Fig.15.2). This maneuver will result in exposure of the pectoralis major muscle. Once the muscle is exposed, excision of excess glandular and fatty tissue from the lower pole is performed and design of the neo-breast follows with a personalized pattern depending on each case (Fig.15.3). Breast modeling is done through the union of the tissue that remains in the lower pedicle, partially dissected at its base in the proportion of 1:1 with equal or slightly greater width at its base. These points can be anchored to the muscle tissue of the pectoralis major, which confers stability to the ap and avoids repeated assemblies that cause more trauma to the tissues.
Finally, points A, B, and C are sutured, and the CAP is positioned with modeling and displacement of possible excess skin (Fig.15.4). Strict control of hemostasis should be maintained to avoid hematomas or collections that may modify morphol­ogy or produce vascular compression with consequent suffering from the ap as well as from the CAP (Fig.15.5).
The authors emphasize the use of suction drains and their maintenance until the drainage volume is less than 15mL/day. The scar that will result in this surgery will be an inverted T, differentiating from other techniques by maintaining the late results, observing little movement of the ballast in the postoperative period.
The main disadvantage of this technique is the scar’s length. Due to the width at the base of the breasts that most patients with breast hypertrophy, often
268
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 15.2 After peri­areolar decortication, the breast is ready for excess glandular and fat tissue resection
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Fig. 15.3 Transoperative vision of the breast after xation of dermal aps in the pectoral fascia.
15 Reduction Mammoplasty withLower Pedicle
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 15.4 After suturing points A, B, and C, the position of the CAP is decided and designed
269
Fig. 15.5 Before and after pictures (21days pot op)
270
https://t.me/medicina_free
gigantomastia, present, a reduced scar may not be an option and the aspect of the resulting scar should be taken into consideration and duiring consultation perform a cost-benet analysis. There are renements in this technique, as Hülya and Turmedem explain, which propose a modication consisting of the resection of a lower pedicle in pyramidal format by means of a dermal suspension technique to improve the long-term projection of the operated breast. During this renement, the lateral dermal aps are decorticated in the form of a triangle, as extension of the lower pedicle, and xed on the fascia of the pectoralis major with important suspen­sion of the pedicle, forming an internal support (inner bra), avoiding lateral dis­placement of the breast and a better projection, also improving the quality of the vertical scar, due to the lower tension required at the time of closure, and therefore, techniques that seek to achieve more limited scars could be justied. The authors made a modication to improve the contour of the breasts by developing a dermo­adipose ap with higher wings and removal of a dermo-adipose triangle at the junc­tion of these with the lower pedicle (without compromising the base of the pedicle) to round the shape of the inner bra, giving more projection and stability to the der­mal suspension.
This type of renement does not increase the risks and/or complications trans- or postoperatively and has shown enormous acceptance and satisfaction on the part of patients, who seek not only to have a smaller breast but also to renew it.
Although the suspension by means of this new technique in the lower pedicle seems an ideal condition, the authors of the same state that there is no guarantee regarding the long-term suspension of the breasts, so they do not recommend it in the simple correction of ptosis, without breast reduction.
Other authors, such as Azad and Col., proposed block resection of excess breast tissue to avoid changes in the elaboration of the pedicle and ensure greater symmetry.
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Postoperative Care
The authors recommend a series of postoperative care not very different from the guidelines given to patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty. In most cases, patients require hospitalization for 24–48 h. Drains are removed when the volume drained is less than 15 mL in 24 h.
Discharge is performed with specic instructions in writing and medicines for oral administration, such as an analgesic, an antibiotic for 7 days, and an anti­inammatory for 4days.
In general, the operated patient should not perform abduction movements with a rotational angle greater than 90° for an approximate period of 45days, which will provide security until the scar xation of the ap and avoid detachment of hemo­static clots that can cause late bruising. Stitches are usually removed in 12–15days and we routinely apply micropore tape for 3–4weeks.
15 Reduction Mammoplasty withLower Pedicle
https://t.me/medicina_free
271
Complications
Among the most frequent complications, the same as in all mammoplasty proce­dures, such as hematomas, seromas, fatty necrosis, partial necrosis of the CAP (usu­ally due to technical error with section of vascularization or deep decortication of the skin), and hypertrophic or enlarged scars (in the case of excessive tension in the sutures or very heavy breasts in which the exaggerated reduction would compro­mise the vascularization of the aps).
Different studies have shown that there are no signicant differences between reducing mammoplasty by other techniques and mammoplasty with lower pedicle elaboration, in terms of complications such as hematoma, seroma, necrosis, and infections.
There is also no relationship between complications and the volume of the resected. However, there seems to be a direct relationship between suture dehis­cence and resections greater than 1000g in each breast, which may occur in the presence of undiagnosed subclinical infection; therefore, the incidence of this type of complication is highly limited when prophylactic antibiotic therapy is installed and maintained appropriately after surgery. Infections usually arise as a result of inadequate prophylaxis and, when they do occur, present as a severe condition with very unsatisfactory results from an aesthetic point of view. Therefore, prophylactic use of a rst- or second-generation cephalosporin and its maintenance until the seventh postoperative day is recommended.
Another complication that occurs almost in a little with this type of technique and that has become the goal of several studies are the problems associated with breastfeeding after reducing mammoplasties, especially in young patients with severe hypertrophy or gigantomastia. Thus, it is currently considered in some coun­tries as the surgical technique of choice for this type of patient.
Key points for reducing mammoplasty surgery with lower pedicle safe and successful
Adequate preoperative evaluation of the patient Surgical indication with criteria for mammary hypertrophy or gigantomastia associated with
pain or aesthetic complaints Pre- and post-operative photographic record of the patient ALWAYS Beware of section of vascularization or deep decortication of the skin Care in the preparation of the lower pedicle Prophylactic antibiotic therapy ALWAYS Identify and treat complications early Guidance and postoperative care
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025