Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
368
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Fig. 23.4 De-epithelialization of the periareolar region
ab
Fig. 23.5 Creation of new inframammary fold and Mandrekas/Ribeiro glandular ap
23 Tuberous Breast
https://t.me/medicina_free
369
Fig. 23.6 Creation of pocket for ap repositioning
This inferior pedicle receives its vascularization through the fourth, fth, and sixth intercostal arteries. The release of the constriction ring is performed, and the skin naturally slides over the pedicle, forming the base of the breast to be enlarged (Fig.23.7).
The nal suture of the areola is made with continuous round block stitches with non-absorbable 2–0 nylon thread. In certain situations, it may be necessary to suture with interrupted stitches with 5–0 or 6–0 nylon, and other threads may be used according to the surgeon’s preference. Rigotomy may be performed to facilitate skin expansion (Fig.23.8).
It is important to x the breast with hypoallergenic adhesive tape for an approxi­mate period of 15days to model it.
370
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Fig. 23.7 Transection of constricting ring and reconstruction of breast pillars
23 Tuberous Breast
https://t.me/medicina_free
371
Fig. 23.8 Before and after pictures of a tuberous breast reconstruction with breast implants and rigotomy for skin expansion
Conclusions
Tuberous breast is a rare entity and difcult to treat, with numerous variations in its clinical presentation, which requires the individualization of each case to carry out a precise approach with the correct choice of technique to be used.
Thus, the treatment becomes even more complex in patients with marked breast asymmetry, which in many cases may require the combination of several surgical techniques and, sometimes, the performance of more than one surgical time to obtain better results.
Due to the diversity of clinical ndings, there are different therapeutic possibili­ties, which can range from the placement of silicone implants, indicated when nec­essary, to the performance of glandular aps in association with the techniques described above.
372
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
References
Ribeiro R.C., López L.E.F., Romay S. (2018a) Tuberous Breast. In: Avelar J. (eds) Breast Surgery.
Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_39 Ribeiro R.C., Valderrama J.B., Mangles M.G.M. (2018b) Poland’s Syndrome. In: Avelar J. (eds)
Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_44 Jurado J (1976) Plásticas mamárias de redução baseadas em retalho dérmico vertical monopedicu-
lado. Anais XII Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia Plástica, vol 29 Pitanguy I (1984) Mamoplastia reductora con retallo superior em hipertroa mamaria. Rev Bras
Cir 74:265–284 Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M (2002) Creation and evolution of 30 years of the
inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(3):960–970 Robbins TH (1977) A reduction mammaplasty with the areola nipple based on an inferior dermal
pedicle. Plast Reconstr Surg 59(1):64–67 Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Tonadapu P, Foster B (2004) Current preferences for breast
reduction techniques: a survey of board-certied plastic surgeons 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg
114(7):1724–1736 Wallace WH, Thompson WO, Smith RA, Barraza KR, Davidson SF, Thompson JT II. (1998)
Reduction mammaplasty using the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg 40(3):235–240 Ribeiro R.C., de Thuin R., de Figueiredo-e-Silva I.V., Rios M.T. (2018c) Aesthetic Approach
to Breast Reconstruction. In: Avelar J. (eds) Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_46
Avelar J.M. (2018) Asymmetrical Breasts: A Challenge for Aesthetic Repair. In: Avelar J. (eds)
Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54115-0_43 von Heimburg D, Exner K, Kruft S, Lemperle G.The tuberous breast deformity: Classication and
treatment. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49:339–45 Longacre JJ.Correction of the hypoplastic breast with special reference to reconstruction of the
“nipple type breast” with local dermofat pedicle ap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954; 14: 431–41 Goulian D Jr. Dermal mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971 Feb;47(2):105–10. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00006534-197102000-00001. PMID: 4925049.
Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas D, Lambrinaki N, Ioannidou-Mouzaka
L.Aesthetic reconstruction of the tuberous breast deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Sep
15;112(4):1099–108; discussion 1109. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000076502.37081.28.
PMID: 12973230 Meara JG, Kolker A, Bartlett G, Theile R, Mutimer K, Holmes AD. Tuberous breast defor-
mity: principles and practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Dec;45(6):607–11. https://doi.
org/10.1097/00000637-200045060-00006. PMID: 11128758.
Grolleau JL, Lanfrey E, Lavigne B, Chavoin JP, Costagliola M.Breast base anomalies: treatment
strategy for tuberous breasts, minor deformities, and asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999
Dec;104(7):2040–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199912000-00014. PMID: 11149766.
Chapter 24
https://t.me/medicina_free
Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
RicardoCavalcantiRibeiro, AnaBeatrizArduini, andLuisFernandezCordova
Abstract Plastic surgery is indivisible, the binomial aesthetic and reconstructive
plastic surgery raises its importance as both seek harmony, well-being and healing. We cannot dissociate them.
When talking about cosmetic breast surgery, we have many concepts, references, and techniques that can be applied and that were initially created for reconstructive purposes, for example oncoplastic surgery. Even though reconstructive surgery may seem more difcult, sometimes the aesthetic patient´s expectations represent a big­ger challenge.
The idea of this chapter is to bring resources from reconstructive surgery to cos­metic surgery and broaden our horizons, always seeking not only the best result, but also observing the patient in a holistic and ethical way, aiming to balance body and spirit.
Knowledge of the anatomy of the cutaneous arteries and veins is fundamental to the design of skin aps and incisions. In the last four decades, with the introduction
R. C. Ribeiro (*) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil e-mail: rribeiro@centroin.net.br
A. B. Arduini Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
L. F. Cordova Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Casa de Portugal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Plastic Surgery, México City, Mexico
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_24
373© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
374
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
of the microsurgical free skin ap (Daniel and Taylor, Plast Reconstr Surg. 52:111, 1973; Taylor and Daniel. Aust N Z J Surg. 43:1, 1973), the revival of the musculo- cutaneous ap (McCraw etal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 60:341, 1977), the description of the fasciocutaneous ap (Cormack and Lamberty. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. Church-Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1986; Ponten. Br J Plast Surg. 34:215,
1982), and the use of tissue expansion (Radovan. Plast Reconstr Surg. 69:195,
1982) and ap prefabrication (Baudet et al. Prefabricated free ap transfers. Presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, San Antonio, Texas, September 12–13, 1987), that surgeons and anatomists have returned to the anatomic dissecting room to search and research the intricacies of the vascular pathways to and from the skin.
Keywords Breast aesthetics · Capsulectomy · Mammoplasty · Malposition
The concept of aps and its variants become very important in what we seek to explain here, since they are techniques applied to mostly secondary mammaplasties. Knowledge of the anatomy of the cutaneous arteries and veins is fundamental to the design of skin aps and incisions. In the last four decades, with the introduction of the microsurgical free skin ap (Daniel and Taylor 1973; Taylor and Daniel 1973), the revival of the musculocutaneous ap (McCraw et al. 1977), the description of the fas­ciocutaneous ap (Cormack and Lamberty 1986; Ponten 1982), and the use of tissue expansion (Radovan 1982) and ap prefabrication (Baudet et al. 1987), that surgeons and anatomists have returned to the anatomic dissecting room to search and research the intricacies of the vascular pathways to and from the skin. Once the patient has already undergone one or more aesthetic surgical approaches to the breast, due to sur­gical manipulation, resources in front of known aps are becoming increasingly scarce.
It is clear that the primary objective of a surgery, whether augmentation or mas­topexy, is to prevent complications and reduce reoperation rates, focusing on the avoidance of complications is an imperative, especially for an elective procedure. The same decisions and processes that reduce complications also predictably deliver superior aesthetic results. The modern breast augmentation prioritizes avoiding complications, reducing reoperations, and minimizing iatrogenic damage to breast tissue. The success of an operation can only be improved when objective endpoints are dened before surgery.
Breast implants are one of the top ve procedures in plastic surgery; however, due to alterations such as capsular contracture, rippling, decrease of subcutaneous tissue thickness, rupture, malposition, among others, many cases will require plane and implant exchange (Ribeiro and Arduini n.d.).
Among the alternatives, we can mention our experience with capsule graft, mesh graft or even free tram.
24 Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
375
Patient Selection
There must be an alignment of expectations towards the patient regarding the pos­sible results, emphasizing that it is often a tertiary surgery onwards. The biggest challenges present themselves in the face of lack of tissue, thin and accid tissue, multiple approaches with the change of plans with loss of anatomy domicile, desire to increase the breast pocket with larger implants or an even greater challenge, mammoplasty with explant.
After aligning expectations in addition to a systematic assessment of the patient’s health conditions such as body weight, patient height, and an estimate of breast volume requirements, we emphasize that the patient must be emotionally stable. Risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and obesity are not contrain­dications to reconstruction but may inuence the choice of surgical technique and predispose a patient to complications in the donor area (Thorne etal. 2013).
Besides that, surgeons and patients tend to focus on the operation itself as the event that determines the surgical outcome, with preoperative discussion and post­operative management considered to be of secondary importance. Each step of a breast augmentation is no better than the one that preceded it: planning is dependent on patient education; the operative procedure is dependent upon the operative plan; recovery is dependent on the surgical procedure; and nal patient satisfaction is the cumulative result of all of these steps. Most important of all is how perceptions of success after surgery were dened at the initial steps of education.
Capsular Contracture
Patients should be educated before surgery that it is normal to feel the capsule around the implant (Baker grade II), that the capsules on the two sides never develop equally, and that revision should only be considered for a Baker grade III (rm and distorted) or Baker grade IV (painful). Surgery is not indicated for a Baker II cap­sule because there is little likelihood of creating and maintaining a Baker I (no dis­cernable capsule) (Thorne etal. 2013).
Capsular contracture is and has always been a leading cause of revisions (Thorne etal. 2013). As scar tissue thickens and tightens around the implant, the breast feels rmer, it looks becomes more spherical, the implant migrates, and the breast can be painful. Though patients may say, “my implants got hard,” in fact, the implants are soft but constrained within a tightening envelope of their own tissue.
The main cause of capsular contracture is inammation, which in turn can be caused by silicone gel bleed, glove talc, blood, tissue trauma, and bacteria. Current evidence supports Staphylococcus epidermidis biolm as a signicant cause of cap­sular contracture (Pajkos etal. 2003; Persichetti etal. 2011).
Faced with a scenario of Baker III or IV capsule contracture, when it becomes imperative to change the implant and often change the plane, we must consider the need for rearrangement and reinforcement of the breast pouch to receive the new
376
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.1 Capsule and implant after total capsulectomy and breast implant removal
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
implant. Capsules with these characteristics: thick, brous, calcications, granulo­mas and identied implant rupture or presence of seroma should be submitted to total capsulectomy (Fig.24.1).
Malposition
Implant malposition creates some of the most severe deformities following breast augmentation. The appearance of the breast is determined by the amount and distri­bution of volume, in a container-content relationship, which in turn is determined by the position of the breast implant.
Over-dissection allows an implant to move out from its ideal position and incom­plete dissection prevents an implant from settling in its ideal position. Even with a precise pocket, gradual migration from weight, pressure, and gravity can occur, particularly with chest wall deformities (Thorne etal. 2013) (Fig.24.2). To avoid migration beyond the inframammary fold, the inferior cut edge of scarpa’s fascia can be sewn to the muscle fascia, going back to anatomy as a “seat belt,” in this way, some surgeons will routinely place such sutures with the inframammary incision.
24 Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.2 Asymmetry in Inframammary fold due to implant malpostion
Size Exchange
377
Implant size change is usually avoided with proper patient education and selection. Weight uctuations due to a new lifestyle, with the loss of breast tissue, associated or not with accidity and even after pregnancy, it is not uncommon for patients after these changes in the body, together with loss of the result in the breasts, to require replacement of implants, sometimes larger. We cannot rule out the social pressures to do so either (Fig.24.3).
There are two major challenges here: the expansion of a store in the face of a restricted breast pocket, when the desire for a larger implant is desired, or the oppo­site, the desire to remodel the breast with a smaller implant or explant.
In the rst case, we must educate the patient not to pay attention to a specic size, but that her desire will be contemplated as closely as her physical characteris­tics allow. In addition, we must emphasize the importance of tissue elasticity, if there are striations, sagging, positioning of the inframammary fold, excess medial detachment with risk of symmastia, or excessive lateral detachment with risk of lateralization of the breast, larger implants imply enlargement of the areola and nipple effacement (when not performed associated mastopexia) with displacement of the areola as well. Thus, often the need to enlarge the pocket to accommodate a larger prosthesis must be associated with the increase of some structures in order to reinforce them, as in the case of the pectoralis major, preserving it and allowing good containment of the implant, either in the submuscular plane or dual plane.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025