Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
378
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 24.3 Secondary Breast Augmentation 3months postop
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
On the other hand, the change to a smaller implant causes less inconvenience in the sense of creating “more space,” a new prosthesis can be included or not, associ­ated with the remodeling of the mammary gland, with the subglandular or dual plane being preferred.
When the patient is well educated about contemplating her desire, along with her physical characteristics. Implant size is as much as patient’s choice when she chooses to tell the surgeon to select the size that is best for her tissues as when she chooses to tell the surgeon a specic size.
Rippling
Rippling consists of the visible and/or palpable presence of ripples from the implant capsule. Rippling is probably the most distressing of all breast implant issues for patients (Thorne etal. 2013).
Breasts most prone to visible rippling are those with inadequate tissue coverage (e.g., when pinch thickness of the skin and subcutaneous tissue superior to the breast parenchyma is less than 2cm) or when pinch thickness at the inframammary fold is less than 0.5cm. Breasts with preexisting ptosis and those that are suscep­tible to postoperative ptosis are also prone to rippling. These situations should be identied preoperatively. No type of breast implant can compensate for inadequate tissue coverage, and deformities that occur are largely uncorrectable. Therefore, the priority at primary augmentation is to maximize coverage and avoid tis­sue damage.
24 Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
379
All the factors mentioned above can coexist and lead to permanent tissue damage. Thus, thin, weakened, stretched, and damaged tissues are responsible for the occurrence, severity, and difficulty in correction of many of the com­mon reasons for reoperation. The same minor malposition or capsular contrac­ture which would not be visible under thick tissue and tight skin can be quite visible under damaged tissue. Rippling is rarely an issue with good tissue cov­erage but becomes one when tissue is thinned. Finally, any problem that requires correction is more problematic to correct when tissues are thinner or weaker.
Both the surgical act of dissecting a pocket for a breast implant and the long­standing presence of an implant can cause atrophy of breast tissue. Prudent implant selection and exacting surgical technique can help preserve tissue integrity and minimize long-term parenchymal atrophy (Fig.24.4).
A breast implant that stretches the breast envelope as much as would lactation can be anticipated to permanently stretch and alter breast tissue. Highly projecting implants place more pressure per área than a wider implant of the same volume. If width is held constant, highly projecting implants can be nearly twice the volume and weight, thereby placing substantially greater pressure on the rib cage as well as the soft tissue. This causes parenchymal atrophy, thinning of subcutaneous tissues, thinning and stretching of skin, loss of skin elasticity, rib cage deformation, and loss of sensation (Thorne etal. 2013).
These tissue changes can result in rippling, skin stretch requiring mastopexy, and bizarre animation deformities (Thorne et al. 2013). Such problems are often not correctable, and attempts to mask them with highly cohesive implants, an acellular dermal matrix, and fat injections all result in imperfect corrections which are expen­sive and pose their own risks and drawbacks.
Fig. 24.4 Rippling
380
https://t.me/medicina_free
A worrying factor is when there is a very thin scratch, usually less than 5mm, which results in serious complications of formation and various complications with local and systemic infection, which exists of breast tissue and tissue retraction. Thus, here are alternatives to the challenging cases and examples proposed above, demonstrating our experience with capsule graft, mesh or even free tram for selected.
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Capsular Graft Technique
A breast implant capsule forms as a physiological response to the foreign material (Persichetti etal. 2014) and consists of brous connective tissue, mainly broblasts and collagen brils (Basseto et al. 2010). Previous reports have described their application as grafts or aps (Yoo and Lee 2010; Gargano etal. 2002), considered as good material for reinforcement, especially to address breast implant-related problems in breast reconstruction (Persichetti etal. 2014).
The concept of this technique is to use a capsule with graft to replace the mesh or acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for secondary aesthetic breast procedures where some situations become a complex and challenging scenario, and also as a lower cost alternative. When replacement from the subglandular to submuscular plane is indicated, muscular reinforcement is mandatory. During the surgical application of this practice, it is important to take advantage of the breast pocket concept by adapt­ing the skin envelope of the breast in order to reshape it (Baxter 2016).
To make use of this technique we must follow some criteria: thin tissue coverage, exchange of the implant by patient’s request (older generation implants), malposi­tion of implants, capsular contracture, and rippling. It is not recommended to per­form this technique with patients affected by late or recurrent seroma and infection of the breast pocket were excluded. Intraoperative exclusion criteria applied for capsules with these characteristics: thick, brous, calcications, granulomas and identied rupture of the implant or presence of seroma (Ribeiro and Arduini n.d.).
Surgical Technique
Starting from the incision previously proposed according to the surgical plan, a total capsulectomy is performed with en bloc resection of the implant and a rigorous hemostasis was conducted. Defatted capsule reverting and immersed in saline solu­tion with a double antibiotic solution (1g cefazolin +80mg gentamicin). The new breast pocket was washed with saline solution, hydrogen peroxide and the same antibiotic solution (Ribeiro and Arduini n.d.).
It should be noted that re-approaches should, in most cases, be accompanied by replacement of the prosthesis due to the great chance of contamination of the old prosthesis, regardless of the size change or not.
24 Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
381
Next, the implant’s plane replaced from subglandular to submuscular due to thinning of the tissue, a piece of capsule graft sutured on edges of the pectoralmajor muscle with absorbable suture (VylcrilR 3–0) to expand the breast pocket, with the inner face of the capsule in direct contact with the implant. On the other hand, where the implant is placed in the subglandular plane because there is appropriate thickness of the tissue, the graft proposed for reinforcement in the prevention of deformities (Ribeiro and Arduini n.d.). With this technique, all the harvested cap­sular grafts were viable to obtain complete coverage of the breast contour deformities.
In this study, it was observed complete integration of the graft and better coverage of the implant, corrections of retractions and rippling, as well as tis­sue expansion in the subpectoral plane when the change of plane was per­formed. No complications or new episodes of contracture were observed and an aesthetic improvement and higher degree of satisfaction was reported by the patients.
The capsule graft seems to be an excellent coverage reinforcement mechanism in aesthetic breast revision using implants. Because the capsule is autologous tissue, there is no additional cost in contrast to the use of ADM or synthetic meshes (Neto and Gebrim 2019). Thus, the capsule graft does not generate rejection, it fully inte­grates with the patient’s tissue, in addition to providing reinforcement of the struc­tures in the above-mentioned tissues (Fig.24.5).
Autologous material such as capsule graft or aps and fat grafting can be useful in combination for recreating a stable breast implant pocket (Wessels etal. 2014; Bogdanov-Berezovsky etal. 2013) and still meet the criteria of suitable materials.
a1 a2 a3
bcd
Fig. 24.5 Intraoperative view (a1/a2/a3) Capsule suture, (b) Newly created breast pocket; (c) Capsule reinforcement and implant replacement (d) Pocket closed
382
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Mesh Graft
As shown with the capsule graft, the use of synthetic mesh also proved to be a viable and more economical alternative to reinforce the submuscular pocket and implant positioning, compared to the use of the acellular dermal matrix, due to the high cost. The difference in relation to the capsule graft is its quality, which must be discarded, following criteria such as: brotic and calcied capsule, silicone extravasation, con­tamination of the site, suspicion or diagnosis of BIA-ALCL. Given these scenarios, the use of synthetic mesh becomes a viable alternative (Fig.24.6).
Complete coverage of the prosthesis by a submuscular pouch, in order to prevent implant exposure in the event of an eventual skin/wound dehiscence, has been shown to be quite effective and without signicant changes in complications (Billon etal. 2019).
Synthetic meshes are non-biological materials that have been introduced and are available in absorbable materials: Vicryl® (Ethicon Inc., USA), SeraGyn® BR (Serag Wiessner, Germany) and TIGR® Matrix (Novus Scientic, Uppsala, Sweden); or partially absorbable: ULTRAPRO® (Ethicon Inc., USA) and TiLOOP® Bra (Pfm Medicalis, Germany).
The use of synthetic meshes in surgery has already been widely studied, proving to be a safe, biocompatible, hypoallergenic material with a low rate of complica­tions (Gschwantler-Kaulich etal. 2018). Therefore, the use of these materials can be a good substitute for dermal matrices in surgeries.
Fig. 24.6 Complete coverage of the implant in a synthetic mesh reinforced pocket
24 Aesthetic Approaches forBreast Reconstruction
https://t.me/medicina_free
383
Surgical Technique
A pectoralis major submuscular pouch is dissected respecting a minimum of 1cm of tissue thickness and of good quality. The inferomedial edge of the pectoral mus­cle (up to the second intercostal space) is elevated for placement of a silicone mold. The synthetic mesh (mesh) was sutured to this edge of the pectoral muscle, along its entire lower course up to the inframammary fold.
The size of the subpectoral pocket is calculated using the desired implant volume and the patient’s anatomy. A mold of the desired implant volume is then inserted into the partial submuscular pocket to guide the size of the serratus anterior muscle fascia that will have to be lifted to accommodate the lateral portion of the implant, where the mesh will be sutured. After choosing the implant, it was introduced under the synthetic mesh, this material being xed (with Vicryl® 2-0 suture thread) later­ally at the level of the axillary line anterior to the dissected fascia of the serratus anterior muscle and up to the inframammary fold in the desired position. Two suc­tion drains were placed, one in the submuscular pouch and the other in the subcuta­neous tissue, through separate cutaneous accesses, followed by closure of the surgical wound in layers .
Studies with the placement of implants with full muscle coverage show com­plication rates of up to 40%, mainly in relation to poor implant positioning, asymmetry of the submammary crease and capsular contracture (Hansson etal.
2020). Therefore, the limitations of this technique are based on a restricted sub-
muscular pocket, which prevents the placement of larger-volume implants and makes it difcult to create a natural breast and a dened submammary crease. The use of the mesh assists in the expansion of the pocket and better control of the positioning of the implant, as well as a greater expansion of the lower pole of the breast.
Conclusion
The only unequivocal endpoint assessing the quality of breast augmentation is the revision rate. Fortunately, the steps that reduce reoperations also create more beauti­ful breasts. The opposite of a malpositioned implant is an ideally situated implant; the opposite of a contracted capsule is a soft capsule, and so on.
The plastic surgeon’s priority is to maximize preservation of tissue and prevent reoperation. This approach will simultaneously reduce her chances of facing the risks, costs, and emotional distress of another operation and maximize the likeli­hood of an optimal aesthetic result (Thorne etal. 2013).
The techniques mentioned above proved to be very effective in challenging sce­narios such as secondary mammaplasties.
384
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
References
Daniel RK, Taylor GI. Distant transfer of an Island ap by microvascular anastomoses. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1973;52:111. Taylor GI, Daniel RK.The free ap: composite tissue transfer by vascular anastomosis. Aust N Z
J Surg. 1973;43:1.
McCraw JB, Dibbell DG, Carraway JH.Clinical denition of independent myocutaneous vascular
territories. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:341. Cormack GC, Lamberty BGH. The Arterial Anatomy of Skin Flaps. Edinburgh: Church-
Livingstone; 1986. Ponten B.The fasciocutaneous ap: its use in soft tissue defects of the lower leg. Br J Plast Surg.
1982;34:215. Radovan C.Breast reconstruction after mastectomy using the temporary expander. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1982;69:195. Baudet J, Rivet D, Martin D, Boileau R.Prefabricated free ap transfers. Presented at the 3rd
Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, San Antonio,
Texas, September 12-13, 1987. Ribeiro RC, Arduini AB.Capsular graft for secondary breast augmentation. ISAPS.NL:June20 Thorne, C.H., Chung, K.C., Gosain, A.K., Gurtner, G.C., Mehrara, B.J., Rubin, J.P., & Spear,
S. L. (2013). Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery: Seventh edition. Wolters Kluwer Health
Adis (ESP). Pajkos A., Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE.Detection of subclinical infection
in signicant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(5):1605-1611. Persichetti P, Lombardo GAG, Marangi GF, Gherardi G, Dicuonzo G. Capsular contracture and
genetic prole of ica genes among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from subclinical peri-
prosthetic infections. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1747-1748. Persichetti P, Segreto F, Pendolino AL, Del Buono R, Marangi GF. Breast implant capsule aps
and grafts: a review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(3):540 Basseto F, Scarpa, Caccialanza E, Montesco MC, Magnani P (2010) Histological features of peri-
prosthetic mammary capsules: silicone vs poliurethane. Aesth Plast Surg 34:481-485 Yoo G, Lee PK (2010) Capsular aps for management of malpositioned implants after augmenta-
tion mammoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 34:111-115 Gargano F, Moloney DM, Arnstein PM.Use of a capsular ap to prevent palpable wrinling of
implants. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55:269 Baxter RA.Internal bra: a unifying solution for reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery issues.
Plast Aesthet Res 2016;3:3-7 Neto MS, Gebrim LH.Capsular Flap for Implant Coverage in Breast Reconstruction Following
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women With Previous Breast Augmentation. Plastic Surgery
Case Studies. 2019. 5: 1-3. Wessels L, Murphy S, Merten S.The capsular hammock ap for correction of breast implant pto-
sis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:354-7 Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, Krieger Y. Capsular ap: new applications.
Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:395-7 Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP. Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in
implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: current concepts. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol.
2019;47(3):311-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2019.01.010 Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Leser C, Salama M, Singer CF. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruc-
tion: higher complication rate vs cosmetic benets. Breast J. 2018 24(6):957-64. https://doi.
org/10.1111/tbj.13113
Hansson E, Burian P, Hallberg H.Comparison of inammatory response and synovial metapla-
sia in immediate breast reconstruction with a synthetic and a biological mesh: a randomized
controlled clinical trial. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2020;54(3):131-6. https://doi.org/10.108
0/2000656X.2019.1704766
Chapter 25
https://t.me/medicina_free
Basic Science/Disease Process
RicardoCavalcantiRibeiro, LuisFernandezde Córdova, andAnaBeatrizArduini
Abstract Reduction mammoplasty, as the central purpose of this chapter, aims to
elucidate topics such as anatomy focused on plastic surgery, psychological aspects, safety in surgery, and, of course, the main techniques. Surgery for breast hypertro­phy is one of the most performed in plastic surgery, and more than 100 techniques have been reported in the last century, aiming for a safer procedure, avoiding or at least decreasing complications, and obtaining breasts with natural shape, propor­tional volumes, long-lasting results, and minimal scars that challenge creative ability.
Keywords Basic science · Disease · Evolution
Reduction mammoplasty, as the central purpose of this chapter, aims to elucidate topics such as anatomy focused on plastic surgery, psychological aspects, safety in surgery, and, of course, the main techniques. Surgical treatment of breast hypertro­phy is one of the most common surgical techniques performed in our eld, with more than 100 techniques reported for reduction mammoplasty in the last century, we as plastic surgeons aim for a safer procedure, that avoids or at least decreases complications, and obtains natural shaped breasts with proportional volumes, long­lasting results, and reduced scars, which is a real challenge for our artistic creativity.
R. CavalcantiRibeiro (*) · L. F. de Córdova Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Carlos Chagas Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Plastic Surgery, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil e-mail: rribeiro@centroin.net.br
A. B. Arduini Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mário Kroeff Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_25
385© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
386
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. CavalcantiRibeiro et al.
Etiology of breast hypertrophy is unknown, but it can be the result of an atypical response of the breast to circulating estrogens, causing breast tissue proliferation. There are hypertrophy and brotic changes of the fat tissue elements, but the glan­dular tissue remains with little change. Most women with breast hypertrophy have normal levels of estrogen circulation, as well as normal numbers of estrogen recep­tors in breast tissue. It usually starts at puberty or postpartum, and there is no evi­dence for hormonal therapy.
Virginal hypertrophy usually affects girls between 11 and 16 years, presented as a fast-growing breast reaching a degree of gigantism after menarche. This type of hypertrophy may be unilateral or bilateral, without evidences of hormonal changes.
Conceptually, we can classify breast hypertrophy according to the predicted vol­ume, as shown in Table25.1. There are varying denitions of what is an excessive breast tissue, such as when it exceeds approximately 3% of the total body weight. According to the literature, gigantomastia is considered when breast tissue removal is over than 1000 g from each breast, but this number can change depending on the references.
Breast are composed of mammary parenchyma, which contains glandular tissue divided into lobules, adipose tissue, Scarpa’s fascia with its supercial and deep layers, Cooper’s ligaments, Spence’s tail, the nipple-areola complex (NAC), and lactiferous ducts, in addition to anatomical references. These elements add up to maintain the breast structure and give the nal appearance of the breast.
In addition, another important parameter is the triple blood support—based on the perforating branches of the internal thoracic artery (60%), the lateral thoracic artery (30%), and the anterior and lateral perforating branches of the intercostal arteries (10%)—which is the main reference for making the aps discussed in this chapter.
Thus, size, symmetry, proportion, and location of the breast, as well as its refer­ence points on the chest wall, provide the aesthetics of the breasts in addition to well-dened signs of breast beauty such as conical shape with the areola at the apex.
It is necessary to have a precise knowledge of anatomy in order to choose the most suitable technique for each case.
Table 25.1 Classication of breast hypertrophy
Breast size Breast volume (cm3)
Ideal 250–300 Small hypertrophy 300–600 Moderate hypertrophy 600–800 Big hypertrophy 800–1000 Gigantomastia >1000
25 Basic Science/Disease Process
https://t.me/medicina_free
387
Diagnosis/Patient Presentation
The breasts are a sign of femininity and a sexual organ of high importance for women. During the last decades, the expectations of women regarding the aesthetic and functional aspect of their breasts have increased signicantly. In the case of women interested in having a breast reduction, besides a large spectrum of indica­tions, the main motivations are function, form, and emotional issues related to self-esteem.
Generally, patients who are looking for this surgery have very specic symp­toms, such as shoulder pain, headache, neck pain, shoulder groove (bra mark), kyphosis, inappropriate posture, intertriginous rash, and even neurological symp­toms such as ulnar paresthesia. The compression of the brachial plexus between the coracoid process and the pectoralis minor due to the posture of bending the shoul­ders forward explains the paresthesia. On physical examination, in addition, we can nd signs of fungal infection or even secondary bacterial infection in the inframam­mary folds.
We must analyze very well the psychical aspect, in which the women’s self­condence is usually affected, not only in self-image—they are not beautiful, socially accepted, and have difculties nding partners or engaging in sexual activ­ity—but also difculties in nding suitable clothes, playing sports, and socializing, and sometimes making them with withdrawn personalities. If pathological distur­bances have been suspected, a psychological consultation is suggested to determine the causes and treatment, if possible, prior to surgery.
Before venturing into this type of surgery, the plastic surgeon must be aware of the following factors that will inuence the outcomes.
Breast Size
The choice of technique should be performed according to the degree of hypertro­phy. No specic bra size should be promised.
Skin Type
While in younger women the skin is more tense and elastic, in multiparous women, older women, and those with the presence of stretch marks, the extension of the scar and the ability of the skin to retract will inuence the outcome of the surgery.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025