Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
272
https://t.me/medicina_free
R. C. Ribeiro et al.
Conclusions
After more than 30 years of evolution of mammary reconstruction techniques, the use of a lower pedicle, became the technique of choice for the treatment of large gigantomastias or mammary hypertrophy. The authors indicate this technique mainly in young patients with reproductive expectations after surgery, due to the conservation of the glandular anatomy , thus avoiding the late complications asso­ciated with areola grafts used in the past and preserving lactation. These advances, together with the fact that they guarantee a lasting suspension, demonstrate the interest of current plastic surgeons in achieving a balance between the reality of the patient with this breast pathology and her aesthetic expectations, as well as maintaining their longings for personal fulllment as having a victorious motherhood.
References
Rohrich RJ, Gosman AA, Brown SA, Tonadapu P, Foster B. Current preferences for breast
reduction techniques: a survey of board-certied plastic surgeons 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;114(7):1724–36. Georgiade GS, Riefkohl RE, Georgiade NG.The inferior dermal-pyramidal type breast reduction:
long-term evaluation. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23(3):203–11. Scott GR, Carson CL, Borah GL.Maximizing outcomes in breast reduction surgery: a review of
518 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(6):1633–41. Pérez-Macias JM.Long-lasting evolution of ptosis control after reduction mammaplasty using the
hammock technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31(3):266–74. Ribeiro L, Accorsi A Jr, Buss A, Marcal-Pessoa M.Creation and evolution of 30 years of the infe-
rior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):960–70. Jurado J.Plásticas mamárias de redução baseadas em retalho dérmico vertical monopediculado.
Anais XII Congresso Brasileiro de Cirurgia Plástica 1976;29. Robbins TH.A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedi-
cle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59(1):64–7. Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM.Reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique. An alterna-
tive to free nipple and areola grafting for severe macromastia or extreme ptosis. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1977;59(4):500–7. Calderon Ortega W, Arriagada Stuven J, Godoy Silanes M, Gomes SL.Anatomia y clinica de las
mamoplastias de reducción según técnica del pedículo inferior. Rev Chil Cir. 1992;44(4):437–41. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas DA. Reduction mammaplasty with
the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients. Br J Plast Surg.
1996;49(7):442–6. Wallace WH, Thompson WO, Smith RA, Barraza KR, Davidson SF, Thompson JT 2nd. Reduction
mammaplasty using the inferior pedicle technique. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;40(3):235–40. O’Grady KF, Thoma A, Dal Cin A.A comparison of complication rates in large and small inferior
pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(3):736–42. Zambacos GJ, Mandrekas AD.Complication rates in inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(1):274–6. Hunter JG, Ceydeli A.Correlation between complication rate and tissue resection volume in infe-
rior pedicle reduction mammaplasty: A retrospective study. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26(2):153–6.
15 Reduction Mammoplasty withLower Pedicle
https://t.me/medicina_free
Nahabedian MY, Mod MM.Viability and sensation of the nipple-areolar complex after reduction
mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(1):24–32. Pitanguy I, Salgado F, Radwansky HN.Reduções mamárias: técnicas pessoais sem descolamento
cutâneo. In: Mélega JM, ed. Cirurgia plástica: fundamentos e arte. Cirurgia Estética. Rio de
Janeiro: Médica e Cientíca; 2003. p.477–84. Schlenz I, Rigel S, Schemper M, Kuzbari R. Alteration of nipple and areola sensitivity by
reduction mammaplasty: a prospective comparison of ve techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2005;115(3):743–51. Ribeiro L.A new technique for reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55(3):330–4. Georgiade NG, Seran D, Morris R, Georgiade G.Reduction mammaplasty utilizing an inferior
pedicle nipple-areolar ap. Ann Plast Surg. 1979;3(3):211–8. Saldanha OR, Maloof RG, Dutra RT, Luz OAL, Saldanha Filho O, Saldanha CB. Mamaplastia
redutora com implante de silicone. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2010;25(2):317–24. Bezerra FJF, Moura RMG, Silva Júnior VV. Mamoplastia redutora e simetrização de mama
oposta em reconstrução mamária utilizando a técnica de pedículo inferior. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2007;22(1):52–9. Anger M, Schneider EJ, Souza CE, Nakayama LI. Mamoplastia redutora de pedículo inferior:
sensibilidade aréolo-mamilar, indicações e resultados. Arq Catarin Med. 2001;30(3/4):32–7. Souza AA, Faiwichow L, Ferreira AA, Simão TS, Pitol DN, Máximo FR.Avaliação das técnicas
de mamoplastia quanto a sua inuência tardia na distância do complexo areolopapilar ao sulco
inframamário. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2011;26(4):664–9. Pacheco LMS, Pacheco AT, Batista KT.Mamoplastia redutora com pedículo medial: modicação
na técnica de Skoog. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2009;24(3):321–7. Menderes A, Mola F, Vayvada H, Barutcu A.Evaluation of results from reduction mammaplasty:
relief of symptoms and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29(2):83–7. Arié G.Una nueva técnica de mastoplastia. Rev Latinoam Cir Plast. 1957;3(1):23–31. Ariyan S. Reduction mammaplasty with the nipple-areola carried on a single, narrow inferior
pedicle. Ann Plast Surg. 1980;5(3):167–77. Castro CC, Salema RF, Ferreira VB, Gazola LA.Mamaplastia redutora pela técnica de pedículo
dermogorduroso da base inferior. Rev Bras Cir. 1983;73(1):47–52. Migliori MR, Muldowney JB.Breast reduction: the inferior pedicle as an axial pattern ap. Aesthet
Surg J. 1997;17(1):55–7. Castillo VMS, Hernández cmC.Incisiones mínimas para mastoplastias reductoras. Rev Cubana
Cir. 2002;41(1):11–5. Reis GMD.A técnica do pedículo de base inferior em mamaplastia redutora e mastopexia causa
quistos? Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2006;21(2):73–6. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, March 2003- 111 (3), page 1363. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 107 (7) June 2002 page 2605
273
Chapter 16
https://t.me/medicina_free
Importance ofGlandular andDermoglandular Flaps forBreast Surgery
CarlosOscarUebel
Abstract We have many techniques for breast reduction and for mastopexies.
Since Pitanguy presented his technique at the Second World Congress of IPRAS (International Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery) in 1959 in London (Pitanguy 1959) and published his paper in 1967in a peer-reviewed journal—the British Journal of Plastic Surgery (Pitanguy 1967)—many other papers appear in the literature, especially using dermoglandular aps to enhance the volume and to ll out the upper pole of the breast. Skoog (Skoog 1971), Ribeiro (Ribeiro 1975), and Silveira Neto (Silveira Netto 1976) can be referred as introducers of this new approach. We have also started with two similar procedures that we want to discuss in this chapter—the superior glandular ap and the lateral dermoglandular rota­tion ap.
Introduction
We have many techniques for breast reduction and for mastopexies. Since Pitanguy presented his technique at the Second World Congress of IPRAS (International Plastic Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery) in 1959in London (Pitanguy 1962), and published his paper in 1967in a peer-reviewed journal—the British Journal of Plastic Surgery (Pitanguy 1967)—many other papers appear in the literature, especially using dermo­glandular aps to enhance the volume and to ll out the upper pole of the breast. Skoog (Skoog 1971), Ribeiro (Ribeiro 1975), and Silveira Neto (Silveira Netto 1976)
C. O. Uebel (*) Division Plastic Surgery, PUCRS University, Porto Alegre, Brazil e-mail: carlos@uebel.com.br
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_16
275© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
276
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
can be referred as introducers of this new approach. We have also started with two similar procedures that we want to discuss in this chapter—the superior glandular ap and the lateral dermoglandular rotation ap.
C. O. Uebel
Method andTechnique
Superior Pedicle Flap
This is a very simple procedure combined with the Pitanguy-Ariê technique (Ariê
1957) indicated for ptotic and medium breast hypertrophy. An ellipse of the skin is
removed vertically reaching 2cm above the inframammary sulcus or extended later­ally as shown in Fig.16.1a–c. A superior pedicle glandular ap is erased from below and rotated by itself into a tunnel undermined into the upper pole of the breast. This is a maneuver to ll out and to enhance the volume of the breast giving a good sup­port as shown at postoperative 18months (Figs.16.2a–d and 16.3a–c). An intrader­mal suture is placed, and sterile strips are applied to protect the suture and are kept in place for 15days. We can use the “L” technique published by Bozola (1990). Very often, in around 30%, we combine the procedure with abdominoplasty and other body contouring surgeries (Fig.16.4a–c).
c
Fig. 16.1 (a, b, c) A superior pedicle glandular ap is erased and rotated by itself to ll out the upper breast pole
cd
16 Importance ofGlandular andDermoglandular Flaps forBreast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
ab
277
Fig. 16.2 (a, b, c, d) Postoperative 18months with a fullling upper pole
Supralateral Dermoglandular Flap
The most common breast reduction technique still used in Brazil is the one described by Pitanguy in 1967. It consists of removing a keel-shaped portion of the breast tis­sue, which results in two lateral pillars that provide the necessary structure to raise the nipple-areola complex (NAC) in a very natural shape while maintaining good physiologic function. This technique is especially useful for patients with mild to moderate hypertrophic breasts (Fig.16.5a–c).
However, for patients with larger breast hypertrophy, with or without asymmetry, it is signicantly more challenging to raise the NAC, and the procedure may create some skin tension. For such patients, the techniques described by Skoog in 1971 (Skoog 1971) and Silveira Neto in 1976 (Silveira Netto 1976) and modied by the author in 1978 (Uebel and Uebel 1978; Uebel 2011; Uebel 2012) are very useful to be applied.
Technique
Points A, B, and C are marked with the patient in an upstanding position in the same fashion as in the Pitanguy technique. The supralateral ap is outlined (Fig.16.6). The patient is given general anesthesia and sometimes epidural anesthesia through
278
ab
https://t.me/medicina_free
ab
c
C. O. Uebel
Fig. 16.3 (a, b, c) Ptotic breast with the Pitanguy-Ariê technique and superior pedicle ap to enhance the upper pole
c
Fig. 16.4 (a, b, c) This technique can be combined frequently with abdominoplasty
16 Importance ofGlandular andDermoglandular Flaps forBreast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
279
a continuous-infusion catheter. To reduce intraoperative bleeding, a local inltration of saline and epinephrine 1:200,000 is done. The dermoglandular ap is deepitheli­alized and prepared, together with the NAC; the ap is then ready to be relocated to its new site without excessive tension and with a good blood supply.
ab
c
Fig. 16.5 (a, b, c) Medium breast hypertrophy treated with the Pitanguy technique
Fig. 16.6 The supralateral
ap is outlined
280
jk
lm
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. O. Uebel
In 1971, Skoog published his nipple-areola-dermis ap rotation technique for severe hypertrophic breasts. However, this technique sometimes results in problems with vascular support and lactation. In 1976, and with the use of the same principles described by Skoog, Silveira Neto modied the technique by rotating an inner glandu­lar ap which improved irrigation and lactation ability. In 1978, we published another variation of the technique outlining the supralateral dermoglandular ap. In addi­tion to achieving good vascular support and function, this maneuver offers a better contouring to the upper pole of the breast and axillary regions (Figs. 16.7 and 16.8).
abc
def
gh
i
Fig. 16.7 (a–m) A 52-year-old patient with severe hypertrophy was treated with the supralateral dermoglandular rotation ap technique. She is shown 3months postoperatively with improved
breast contour, axillary reduction, and nipple-areola projection
de
16 Importance ofGlandular andDermoglandular Flaps forBreast Surgery
https://t.me/medicina_free
abc
281
fg
Fig. 16.8 (aj) Very common association in a 42-year-old patient with breast hypertrophy and abdomen accidity. She underwent breast reduction with the supralateral dermoglandular ap and abdominoplasty. Two days postoperatively with sterile strips and 6months postoperatively in sitting and standing positions
282
https://t.me/medicina_free
C. O. Uebel
jih
Fig. 16.8 (continued)
For patients with severe breast hypertrophy, with or without asymmetry, there is a bigger challenge to address when raising the NAC.In such cases, the technique of the supralateral dermoglandular ap is indicated to bring the NAC upward with- out any tension, thereby preserving the neurovascular supply and physiologic lacta­tion function. Good sensitivity and a natural contour of the breast and axillary region can be achieved with this technique (Fig.16.7).
The external supralateral dermoglandular ap is designed and deepithelial­ized, preserving the NAC.Resection is done en bloc, removing a complete piece of the mammary tissue reaching the pectoralis major fascia. The ap is rotated from the external site to upward to anchor the areola in the new position. Sutures of 4-0 nylon and 3-0 Monocryl are placed in all levels to close the glandular parenchyma. Intradermal sutures are placed, and sterile strips are applied. Sterile strips are main­tained for more than 3months (Fig.16.8).
Conclusion
The denitive breast reduction technique continues to elude plastic surgeons. We have revisited the superior pedicle ap and the supralateral dermoglandular ap, both of which are important techniques to enhance breast contour and preserve the neurophysiologic function for breastfeeding. They are simple to execute and improve the axillary extension and the upper pole contour giving an excellent NAC projection and an outstanding patient satisfaction, as evidenced by a low revision rate. The operations should be an option when treating patients with medium-to­large breast hypertrophy.
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025