Добавил:
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл

.pdf
Скачиваний:
0
Добавлен:
28.08.2026
Размер:
73 Мб
Скачать
188
https://t.me/medicina_free
G. Borille and L. F. de Córdova
non- existing phenomenon in nature, which is a mass index of 25 or more with a muscular hypertrophic abdomen.
Conclusion
MD lipoabdominoplasty allows the correction of eventual muscle aponeurotic defects through suture plication and excess skin removal in order to produce a natu­ral athletic look by ensuring the athletic triad is present.
References
Avelar JM.Abdominoplasty: A new technique without undermining and fat layer removal. Arq
Catarinense Med. 2000;29:147–149. Juarez M.A., Illouz, Y Lipoaspiraçao (1986) Ed. Hipócrates Ribeiro RC, Matos WN Jr, Cruz PF. Modied lipoabdominoplasty: updating concepts. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:38e–47e. Saldanha OR. Lipoabdominoplasty with selective and safe undermining. Aesthetic Plast Surg.
2003;27:322–327. Avelar JM.Abdominoplasty: technical renement and analysis of 130 cases in 8 years’ follow-up.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1983;7(4):205–212 Callia W.Contribuição para o estudo da correção cirúrgico do abdome pêndulo e globoso—Técnica
original [dissertation]. Faculty of the Medical University of São Paulo, 1965. IIlouz YG.Une nouvelle technique pour lês lipodystrophies localisées. Rev Chir Esth Franc 1980;
April: 6 Hakme F. Technical details in the liposuction associated with abdominoplasty. Rev Bras Cir
1985;75:331. Avelar JM.Uma nova técnica de abdominoplastia—sistema vascular fechado de retalho subdér-
mico dobrado sobre si memo combinado com lipoaspiração. Ver Brás Cir 1999;13:3–20. Wilkinson TS, Swartz BE.Individual modication in body contour surgery: the limited abdomino-
plasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;779–784.
Chapter 11
https://t.me/medicina_free
MILA-Minimally Invasive Robotic and Endoscopic Lipo-Abdominoplasty
MarcoAurelioFaria-Correa
Abstract The author presents his insights concerning mini-abdominoplasty tech-
nique, introduces new concepts and reports his more than 30years’ experience in treating the functional and cosmetic deformities of the abdominal wall by using minimal incisions open methods and minimally invasive methods to treat rectus diastasis and lipodystrophy in patients without redundant skin. In 1989, he real­ized that:
• The rectus plication should not be limited to the lower abdomen but in its exten-
sion at all from the pubic bone to the xiphoid process.
• No skin resection when there was no abbiness or redundant skin.
• Perform the entire procedure through the pre-existent scars, without adding lon-
ger scars.
In 1991, the author started research project adapting endoscopic methods to the subcutaneous territory and started doing endoscopic gasless subcutaneous rectus plication- endoscopic abdominoplasty to treat patients with no redundant skin and no previous scar. With approximately 300 cases done from 1991 to 2016, observing optimal functional and cosmetic results, in patients with more than 20years’ fol­low-up, it proved the efcacy and longevity of the endoscopic abdominoplasty method, giving to the author the enthusiasm for bringing the technique to the next level by introducing in plastic surgery the new emerging technology of robotic sur­gery, incorporating robotic da Vinci Surgical System in his practice to perform muscle-aponeurotic rectus plication-robotic abdominoplasty.
M. A. Faria-Correa (🖂) Singapore, Singapore e-mail: drmarco@drmarco.com
Switzerland AG 2023 J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_11
189© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
190
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. A. Faria-Correa
Keywords Robotic plastic surgery · Robotic rectus plication · Robotic abdominoplasty · Rectus diastasis · Endoscopic rectus plication · Endoscopic abdominoplasty · Muscle- aponeurotic plication · Abdominal wall · Minimally invasive subcutaneous surgery · Subcutaneouscopic surgery
Introduction
We are seeing an increasing number of female and male patients presenting with small- and medium-sized abdominal deformities coming to our clinics asking for minimally invasive and scarless procedures that can effectively improve their core muscle and the aesthetic appearance of the abdomen (Faria Correa 2023). In many cases, the problem is not the cosmetic aspect of the skin, nor striae, nor the redundant folds of the skin, nor overweight nor abdominal lipodystrophy, but rectus diastasis (Figs.11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6, 11.7, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10 and 11.11). They complain that despite working hard at losing weight and having a strict and rigorous workout regime, they cannot get rid of that bulging stomach and/or the peri-umbili­cal deformity (sad belly button). The weakening of the muscle-aponeurotic abdomi­nal wall due to congenital conditions, weight variation, ageing or pregnancy is a
Fig. 11.1 Mini-abdominoplasty with mini-dermolipectomy done in 1986 caused an anatomical deformity by lowering the umbilicus position
11 MILA-Minimally Invasive Robotic and Endoscopic Lipo-Abdominoplasty
https://t.me/medicina_free
191
a
b
cd
e
Fig. 11.2 Minimal scar abdominoplasty: xiphoid-pubic rectus plication, lipectomy, and no skin removal performing the whole procedure using the previous “C-section scar” with the aid of light source retractors. (a) Xiphoid-pubic rectus plication done. (b) Lipectomy being performed. (c) Closure of the previous C-section with no skin resection. (d) Pre-operative drawing/planning. (e) Adipose fat tissue excised and placed on top of the skin for demonstration
frequent cause of rectus diastasis and/or umbilical hernia that can alter the cosmetic aspect of the abdomen (Faria-Correa 2016; Nahas and Ferreira 2010). The rectus abdominal muscle plays an important role, not only in the cosmetic appearance of the abdomen but also in the stability of the spine. Depending on the degree of the rectus diastasis, it can lead to a vicious posture, spine problems, back pain, slipped disc, etc. Rectus plication can effectively restore function providing a balance between the anterior and posterior muscle of the abdominal wall and improve the cosmetic appearance of the abdomen (Faria-Correa 2016; Nahas etal. 2001). The long-term evaluation by ultrasonography and CT scan of the plication of the anterior rectus sheath (Nahas etal. 2004, 2011) as well as our long-term clinic follow-up (Fig.11.6) as shown, the efciency of the recti plication when properly performed.
192
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. A. Faria-Correa
Fig. 11.3 Before and after minimal incision abdominoplasty
Evolution oftheThought
By analysing the results of mini-abdominoplasty in the treatment of small- and medium-sized abdominal deformities, I have drawn the following conclusions:
• Plication of the lower abdominal rectus may cause a protrusion of the upper
abdomen; therefore, rectus plication from the pubis to the xiphoid process is
required.
11 MILA-Minimally Invasive Robotic and Endoscopic Lipo-Abdominoplasty
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.4 Endoscopic abdominoplasty scars hidden inside the navel/umbilical area and inside the pubic hair-bearing area
• Small skin resections in the lower abdomen will not help in the abbiness of the
abdomen and may cause dog ears and/or long scars, so I recommend no skin
resection and working through the smaller incision possible in patients present-
ing with good skin elasticity.
• The reposition of the umbilical scar below its original position may cause a dis-
tortion of the patient original anatomy, an unnatural and weird appearance, so I
recommend reinserting it in its original site.
193
Evolution oftheMethod: FromtheLight Source Retractors toEndoscopic andtoRobotic Methods
In 1989, I started performing mini-abdominoplasty without removing any skin, just using the previous C-section scar, with the aid of light source retractors freeing the umbilical scar, performing a xiphoid-pubic rectus plication and lipectomy and rein­serting the umbilical scar in its original site (Figs.11.2 and 11.3).
Minimal Scar Abdominoplasty Technique
The beautiful results achieved by effectively treating the cosmetics and functional deformities through minimal incisions, without adding new scars, but just by using the previous scars and even improving it, gave me the enthusiasm.
194
https://t.me/medicina_free
M. A. Faria-Correa
Fig. 11.5 Before and after endoscopic abdominoplasty
11 MILA-Minimally Invasive Robotic and Endoscopic Lipo-Abdominoplasty
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.5 (continued)
195
Fig. 11.6 Endoscopic abdominoplasty 20years’ follow-up showing the maintenance of the result of the rectus plication even after patient aging 20years and put on 8kg
196
https://t.me/medicina_free
Fig. 11.7 Long-term follow-up of endoscopic abdominoplasty after 35days showing a very fast recovery with minimal swelling. After 2years, showing maintenance of the result of the rectus plication and fat plication
M. A. Faria-Correa
In 1991 came to me one patient without previous “C-section” asking me if I could treat her using a very small scar hidden inside her pubic hair-bearing area. Attentive to the emerging video-endoscopic method, that was so promising, allow­ing the surgeons working through very minimal incisions, I had the idea of using endoscopic methods in plastic surgery (Faria-Correa 1992a, 1994, 1995, 2008).
Then, at the University Hospital PUC Porto Alegre, I started a research project to adapt endoscopic methods to the subcutaneous territory for treating patients pre­senting with rectus diastasis and no redundant skin, working through incisions as small as 4cm hidden in the pubic hair-bearing area and inside the umbilical area (Faria-Correa 1992a, b, 1994, 1995, 2008) (Fig.11.4). Those days there was a con­cept that we should not use pressured gas in the subcutaneous to develop the optical cavity, the working space, due to the risk of gas embolism when cutting perforator veins during the ap dissection and also the risk of gas dispersion causing the sub­cutaneous emphysema. For circumventing those risks, I developed a set of instru-
the muscle (Faria-Correa 1994, 1995, 2008) (Fig.11.12).
Attentive to the development of new instruments, machines and methods in sur­gery that can facilitate and improve our task and result and with more than 20years of follow-up showing the effectiveness of the technique and the beauty of restoring
11 MILA-Minimally Invasive Robotic and Endoscopic Lipo-Abdominoplasty
https://t.me/medicina_free
197
Fig. 11.8 The before photo showing patient had abdominal deformities after delivering twins and 8kg overweight. 1-year follow-up after patient cut down 8kg. After 5years post-op, patient put back 5kg. We observe the long-term maintenance of the result
the original anatomy leaving minimal and inconspicuous scars (Fig.11.4), in 2013, I started studying and training robotic surgery with the enthusiasm of going for the next level, using the robotic da Vinci Surgery System to perform rectus plication in minimally invasive abdominoplasty (Faria-Correa 2016; Faria Correa 2023).
Robotic surgery is the “gold standard” of the minimally invasive surgery in many surgical elds. The robot high-denition three-dimensional view and the amplica­tion of images give us a much better depth sensation of the surgical eld than the 2D endoscopic view, and it is even better than our naked eyes. Laparoscopic instru­ments have a limited range of motion; the robot EndoWrist range of movements is comparable to the human wrist. The surgeon’s hand tremor is transmitted through the rigid laparoscopic instrument, and this limitation makes delicate procedures more difcult (Lee etal. 2014; Morris 2005). The superb precision and stability of the robot arms, surgical eld and instruments, all controlled by the surgeon seated at the console in a comfortable ergonomic position, without the need of coordinat­ing camera and instrument movement with a surgical assistant, makes the surgery much easier, more precise and less stressful (Faria-Correa 2016).
In urology, robotic prostatectomy is such a solid application, presenting so many advantages over the open methods as well as over the endoscopic methods
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025