Добавил:
Sekretar
kiopkiopkiop18@yandex.ru
t.me/Prokururor I Вовсе не секретарь, но почту проверяю
Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз:
Предмет:
Файл:Ординатура / Хирургия / @xirurgi_2025 / @xirurgi_2025 - 262 - файл
.pdf
4 Sinder’s Technique: AUseful andSafe Approach forAbdominoplasty
https://t.me/medicina_free
Avelar JM (1999a) Abdominoplasty: new concepts for a new technique. (Abdominoplastia: Nuevos
conceptos para una nueva técnica). XXVI Annual International Symposium of Aesthetic Plastic
Surgery, Chairman: Prof. Jose Guerrerosantos, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico.
Avelar JM (1999b) New concepts for abdominoplasty. (Novos conceitos para abdominoplas-
tia). Paper presented at the 36th Congress of the Brazilian Society of Plastic Surgery, Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil.
Avelar JM (2000a) Abdominoplasty without undermining (Abdominoplastia sem descolamento).
São Paulo: XX Jorn. Paulista Cir Plast.
Avelar JM (2000b) Abdominoplasty: a new technique without undermining and fat layer removal
(Abdominoplastia: uma nova técnica sem descolamento e remoção da camada de gordura). Arq
Catarinense de Med 29:147–149.
Callia WE (1965) Contribuição ao estudo de correção cirúrgica do abdomen pêndulo e globus
(contribution to the study of surgical correction of the pendulum abdomen and globus). original
art. Doctoral Thesis Fac Med USP, São Paulo.
Jolly R (1911) Die operation des Fettbauches. Berl Klin Wochenschr 29:1317.
Pitanguy I (1967) Abdominal lipectomy: an approach to it through an analysis of 300 consecutive
cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 40:384–391
Pitanguy I (1974) Yabar AA, Pires CEB, Motta SR Aspectos atuais em lipectomia abdominal. Rev
Bras Cir 64(5/6):147–167.
Pitanguy I etal. (1974) Aspectos atuais em lipectomia abdominal. Rev Bras Cir 64(4/5): 49–164
Sinder R (1975a) Plastic surgery of the abdomen– personal technique with prior undermining of
the supraumbilical ap– before infraumbilical resection and the use of the dermoadipose ap.
(Cirurgia Plastica do Abdomen– Tecnica Pessoal com prévio descolamento do retalho supra-
umbilical– antes da Ressecção Infraumbilical e uso de retalho dermoadiposo) VI Int Congr of
Plast and Reconstructive Surg, Paris, 25 Aug.
Sinder R (1975b) Plastic Surgery of the Abdomen. Personal technique. In: Abstracts of the 6th
International Congress of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Masson, Paris, pp584–591.
Sinder R (1975c) Use of a decorticated dermo-adipose ap in abdominoplasty. Abstracts of the
sixth international congress of plastic and reconstructive surgery, Paris, 24–29.
Sinder R (1979) Abdominal plastic surgery. (Cirurgia plástica abdominal) Ed. by Sinder, Niteroi.
Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Thorek M (1942) Plastic surgery of the breast and abdominal wall. Ed. Charles C. Thomas,
Springeld.
Vernon S (1957) Umbilical transplantation upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J
Surg 94:490–492.
85

Chapter 5
https://t.me/medicina_free
The Beginning, Development, andCurrent
Status ofLipoabdominoplasty: New
Concepts forAbdominoplasty
JuarezMoraesAvelar
Abstract Ever since I started my professional activates in 1973, I noticed that there
were several elds in plastic surgery that needed technical improvements to solve
multiple problems. In my opinion, abdominoplasty was one of those areas that
required new surgical fundaments and other techniques to achieve better results and
minimize complications.
At that time, I identied three essential topics that needed new surgical approaches
for abdominoplasty: (1) the creation of a new umbilical region; (2) adiposities
remaining in the silhouette of the body; and (3) the high incidence of local and systemic complications. I concluded that those three topics required new anatomic
studies and new techniques to achieve better surgical, more-aesthetic results.
1. The creation of the new umbilical region was needed for the transposition of the
umbilicus and for other techniques that leave circular scars around the incisions,
which may lead to retraction and contraction scars. To avoid circular scars, I
developed a new method of making triangular incisions.
2. Remaining local adiposities were improved through the liposuction technique
introduced by Illouz which reshaped the body’s contouring. However, redundant
skin after liposuction on the abdomen bothers patients and surgeons. My rst
operations inspired me to consider two problems: (1) the unknown anatomy of
the subcutaneous compartment and (2) the redundant skin of the abdominal wall
after liposuction.
To study the anatomy of the abdominal wall, I performed dissections combined with liposuction on cadavers, which enabled me to describe the areolar
and lamellar layers and the fascia supercialis between them. Concerning redundant skin after liposuction, I performed this combined procedure to remove it,
and in this way, a new procedure was introduced.
J. M. Avelar (*)
Brazilian Scientic Institute of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, São Paulo, Brazil
Switzerland AG 2023
J. M. Avelar, R. Cavalcanti Ribeiro (eds.), Body Contouring,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42802-9_5
87© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature

88
https://t.me/medicina_free
3. Complications after and during abdominoplasty, especially in combination with
liposuction, remained great challenges. After my anatomical study, I concluded
that I could combine those two procedures as long as the perforator vessels did
not sustain damage during surgery. Therefore, I described and introduced a new
technique, namely lipoabdominoplasty, which reduced complications and
achieved smooth body contouring.
Keywords Abdominoplasty · Liposuction · Lipoabdominoplasty · Combined
approach · Without undermining
J. M. Avelar
Introduction
When I looked back on 50 years of performing plastic surgery, I noticed that several
elds still required technical changes to improve aesthetics of surgical results. At
that time, I identied that abdominoplasty was one of the areas that had several
complications that hampered achieving better surgical results. Among surgeries,
abdominoplasty was one of the most complex and presented challenges to all plastic
surgeons around the world.
The rst abdominoplasty was performed by Kelly (1899), which was the beginning of a long and rich history of such surgeries over the past century, followed by
many other authors’ improving the aesthetic outcomes of surgeries on the abdominal wall. Horizontal incisions were described by Malbec (1948), Callia (1965),
Pontes (1965, 1982), Pitanguy (1967, 1977, 1982), Avelar (1976a, b, 1983a, b,
1985a, b, 1999a, b, 2000a, b), Guerrerosantos (1982a, b), Guerrerosantos et al.
(1980), Planas (1982), Sinder (1975, 1982), Hinderer (1982), and Cavalcanti and
Cavalcanti (1982), among others. Vertical incisions were described by Babcock
(1916). The circular approach was proposed by Gonzales-Ulloa (1959, 1982), Vilain
and Dubousset (1964), and Vilain (1982). Submammary incisions were described
by Thorek (1939), Rebello etal. (1972), and Rebello (1982). More recently, I introduced (Avelar 1999a, b, 2000a, b) a crescent-shaped skin resection on bilateral sub-
mammary folds combined with liposuction to improve the aesthetics of upper
abdominoplasty.
According to my analysis and reections, there have been three main complications for every plastic surgeon: new ideas to add to basic techniques, new concepts
for abdominoplasty, and more anatomical knowledge. In my opinion, surgical performance should minimize complications during and after surgery and improve the
aesthetics of surgical results. In my practice, meeting these demands has been complex ever since I started my professional activities in 1973. These complications
needed specic approaches to give plastic surgeons more enthusiasm for performing abdominoplasty. The anterior abdominal wall is a specic anatomical structure
that protects the internal organs and gives an aesthetic image to the human body.

5 The Beginning, Development, and Current Status of Lipoabdominoplasty: New…
https://t.me/medicina_free
89
When performing any surgery on this area, remodeling the body’s contouring was a
constant challenge.
Since the beginning of my practice, I have identied three essential topics that
needed new surgical approaches for abdominoplasty: (1) the creation of a new
umbilical region; (2) the remaining adiposities leaving behind an inelegant silhouette of the body; (3) the high incidence of local and systemic complications.
I concluded that those three topics required new anatomic studies and new techniques to achieve better surgical aesthetic results and minimize patients’
suffering.
1. In all cases of full abdominoplasty, a new umbilical area must be created because
the umbilicus is transposed to that new location (Vernon 1957). Ever since I
started my professional activities, I have devoted considerable effort to trying to
avoid leaving behind a nal circular scar around the new umbilicus, which was
the nal result of every technique. Therefore, I developed a new method making
triangular incisions around the umbilicus, similar to atypical Z-plasty (Avelar
1976a, b, 1978, 1979, 1983a, b). Following my procedure, the nal scar is not a
circular one, the aim of which is to avoid retraction and contraction, which themselves may leave an inelegant appearance. Therefore, in my hands and publications, one of the three main complications in abdominoplasty had been solved.
My method was well understood and employed by other surgeons for the reconstruction of a new umbilicus (Lessa 1982), even as a routine approach during
abdominoplasty (Daher 1982).
2. Remaining adiposities leave behind an inelegant silhouette of the body, but this
has been improved through the liposuction technique introduced by Illouz (1980,
1983a, b, 1984, 1986a, b), yielding better aesthetic results on body contouring.
After I went to Paris in early 1983 with the specic purpose of observing Illouz’s
operations to learn his new technique, I noted two problems: rst, the unknown
anatomy of the subcutaneous compartment where the cannulas worked during
the liposuction procedure, and second, the redundant skin of the abdominal wall
after liposuction.
3. The high incidence of local and systemic complications during and after abdom-
inoplasty were still great challenges to solve, as reported by Guerrerosantos
(1982a, b), Guerrerosantos etal. (1980), D’Assumpção (1982), Mélega (1982),
and Martins (1982).
When I observed Illouz’s operations and performed my rst liposuction operations on the abdominal wall, I concluded that the cannula worked in an unknown
compartment of the subcutaneous panniculus. Since the beginning, I decided to
research the anatomy of this region by performing several anatomical dissections
and liposuctions on cadavers to study the subcutaneous layers and the behavior of
these tissues after liposuction (Avelar 1986a, b, c, 1987, 1989).
On the other hand, to treat the excess skin on the abdominal wall after liposuction, I decided to simultaneously resect it. In this way, a new approach was

90
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar
developed for abdominoplasty that became well understood by and earned the
acceptance of plastic surgeons (Avelar 1985a, b, 1986b). A new eld was thus
introduced: aesthetic surgery on the abdominal wall as a complementary procedure to solve the excess of panniculus after liposuction. However, liposuction on
the submentonian and submandibular regions in patients without cutaneous accidity, even in association with rhytidoplasty, did not present redundant skin after
liposuction, or those complications arose after abdominoplasty (Avelar
1983b, 1985c).
The combined procedure of liposuction with resecting excess skin during
abdominoplasty didn’t bring new kinds of complications, but the high incidence of
seroma, the slough and necrosis of the panniculus, local infection, and hyperpigmentation of the skin remained. In light of these frequent complications, after a
short period of time, I made the radical decision to no longer perform such combined procedures (Avelar 1988). Over a period of 10years, I no longer combined
both procedures during abdominoplasty, but rather, I returned to my previous anatomical research on the abdominal wall (Avelar 1986a, b, c, 1987, 1989), looking
for a way to solve the problems stemming from this combination of liposuction
with resecting the redundant skin of the abdominal wall. In my previous anatomical
study, I described and recommended that liposuction should be performed primarily on lamellar layer (the deeper one) in order to preserve the perforator vessels
during surgery (Figs.5.5d and 5.6d, e, f). This technical principle has been recommended ever since I described the anatomy of the abdominal wall. After 10years
of reviewing my previous anatomic study and reecting on the aforementioned
complications, I nally concluded that I could combine those two procedures
simultaneously (liposuction and the resection of redundant skin of the abdomen
wall) as long as the perforator vessels (arteries, veins, and lymphatics) did not sustain damage during surgery, thus avoiding dead space (Avelar 1999a, b, c, 2000a, b,
2001a, b).
All these surgical principles are part of an evolution in abdominoplasty where the
perforator vessels work as multiple pedicles that provide adequate arterial blood
supply to the remaining abdominal panniculus, preserve venous circulation and
lymphatic circulation, and avoid seroma formation. Thanks to the perforator vessels
and because there is no dead space around the abdomen, no internal suture from the
panniculus to the aponeurosis is needed.
Therefore, I described and introduced new concepts to minimize complications
during and after surgery and to improve the aesthetics of the surgical results. Such a
combined procedure is called lipoabdominoplasty, for which I established new surgical principles after a long time as the result of my anatomical research into solutions for some of the perioperative and postoperative complications. So, my dream
at the beginning of my career in 1973 became a reality. When liposuction was introduced by Illouz (1980, 1983a, b, 1984, 1986a, b), I proposed a combination of his
new technique with traditional abdominoplasty to solve several complications during and after surgery (Avelar 1985a, b, 1986b).

5 The Beginning, Development, and Current Status of Lipoabdominoplasty: New…
https://t.me/medicina_free
91
Technique
Surgical Planning: Classication
According to clinical evaluations and patient selections, the surgical planning for
lipoabdominoplasty with reduced panniculus undermining may be classied in four
types of operations: lower lipoabdominoplasty, upper lipoabdominoplasty, upper
and lower lipoabdominoplasty, and full lipoabdominoplasty (which is described in
Chap. X). Also, Erfon created a classication system that is an excellent guideline
for reaching an adequate orientation before surgery (Erfon 2000). The subject of
this chapter is restricted to full lipoabdominoplasty, through which all skin above
the suprapubic region and below the umbilicus must be resected. In fact, the whole
abdomen wall is treated, but the perforator vessels are not cut, because in my original descriptions (Avelar 1999a, b, c, 2000a, b), the remaining panniculus is not to be
undermined. That is the main difference between my technique and the conventional abdominoplasty, where wide undermining is performed and all the perforator
vessels are cut.
Surgeons must carry out a preoperative evaluation before planning any operation
(Fig.5.1) to take an adequate measurement of the anatomical points at the location
of the umbilicus, and the patient may follow the surgeon’s evaluation. The surgeon
must hold the panniculus below the umbilicus and be sure that they can resect it and
that the skin of the periumbilical area can reach the suprapubic incision. It means
that the upper abdomen may be pulled downward to cover the entire area of the
abdominal wall. Also, the surgeon should examine the patient in a standing position
in this evaluation. I have mirrors strategically positioned in my examination room
so that patients can see all the anatomical abnormalities in their bodies’ contours
(Fig.5.2) (Avelar 1986a, b, c).
abc
Fig. 5.1 Pre-operatory examination and demarcation for full lipoabdominoplasty. Photo (a)
patient in standing position the abdominal panniculus is held in order to evaluate its thickness on
upper abdominal wall; (b) muscular diastasis is demarcated on each side of the rectus abdominalis
and the infraumbilical area is pulled downwards to evaluate the possibility of its resection during
operation; (c) the patient with a camera takes photo through a mirror placed on ceiling of the examining room, following preoperatory examination and demarcation as well

92
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar
ab
Fig. 5.2 A set of mirrors in the examining room at my clinic in order the patient can see herself or
himself in frontal, posterior, and lateral view simultaneously. Photo (a) a diagram to demonstrate
my examining; (b) photo of a patient in front of one vertical mirror and she can see herself in
all sides
ab c
Fig. 5.3 Computerized tomography is a useful rotinaire exam before lipoabdominoplasty for conrmation the surgical evaluation of patient presenting diastasis of the rectus abdominalis muscle
on the umbilical region. Photo (a) before surgery showing diastasis of the rectus. The arrow indicates the fascia supercialis all around the abdominal wall; (b) same patient after operation with
reinforcement of the muscular aponeurotic wall. The arrow shows the fascia supercialis is very
close to muscular aponeurotic wall, however in supra iliac regions it is well preserved in the middle
of the panniculus; (c) front view of TC showing diastasis of the rectus abdominis
The Operation
After completing the above steps, the surgeon might have enough information to
choose the appropriate technique for lipoabdominoplasty. Each patient must present
normal blood tests and must have undergone a fundamental clinical evaluation performed by physician that includes an electrocardiogram (ECG) and other specic
exams, such as computerized tomography (CT), when they are necessary to evaluate
the diastasis of the rectus abdominalis (Fig.5.3). A complete series of photos of the
regions to be treated must have already been taken.

5 The Beginning, Development, and Current Status of Lipoabdominoplasty: New…
https://t.me/medicina_free
93
abcde
Fig. 5.4 A 65-year-old patient underwent full lipoabdominoplasty following the technique
described. Photos (a, b) mesurement and technical demarcations prior surgery; (c) after full lipoabdominoplasty; (d) same patient in left oblique view; (e) after full lipoabdominoplasty with creation
of the new umbilical region
Preliminary Demarcations
All my operations are performed at the hospital under epidural or general anesthesia, where patients stay for at least 24h. I prefer to demarcate the patient’s body the
day before the operation. Because I have a useful set of mirrors, my patient can see
and follow my demarcations (Fig.5.4). Patient should see their deformities once
more, and surgeons must explain the relevant surgical details to them. The patient
must stay in a standing position in front of the mirrors in order to follow my drawing
on their body (Avelar 1986c). After a careful analysis, all the deformities are drawn.
Two areas must be well demarcated: (1) the area for full-thickness skin resection
where liposuction will be performed on the panniculus and the location of the nal
scars and (2) the areas for deep liposuction (below the fascia supercialis) on the
upper abdomen wall, the lateral sides, and the posterior regions (Fig. 5.4).
Premedication is a matter of a routine and is prescribed by an anesthesiologist after
a clinical evaluation has been completed before surgery.
Full Lipoabdominoplasty
Full lipoabdominoplasty is the most frequently performed procedure in abdominoplasty; it is combined with liposuction and skin resection on the entire suprapubic
region to repair abnormalities in the abdominal wall. In this modality of lipoabdominoplasty, the umbilicus is transposed and a new umbilical area is created. Once
again, the selection of patients before surgery is a fundamental step for the surgeon
to evaluate whether to remove all the skin of the suprapubic region, and the cutaneous area above the umbilicus may be pulled downward to be sutured to the inferior
border of the surgical incision.

94
https://t.me/medicina_free
J. M. Avelar
Surgical Demarcations During Surgery
Two areas must be well demarcated to reach an adequate orientation during surgery:
1. The area for skin resection corresponding to the whole segment on the suprapu-
bic region that is below the umbilicus needs demarcation. My preferred technique for drawing is similar to Callia’s technique (Callia 1965). Therefore, the
nal scar will be as small as possible where the lateral segment is placed on the
inguinal folds on each side and a convex line is placed on the pubic area (Fig.5.4).
2. The area for liposuction on the abdominal wall above the umbilicus and on the
lateral and posterior aspects of the torso also need demarcation. Therefore, all
deformities (localized adiposities and skin excess) must be drawn on the day
before surgery.
Liposuction Procedure
The patient on the operating table stays in the supine position, and after anesthesia,
the abdomen and lateral aspects of the torso are prepared. Before starting the liposuction procedure, local inltration with a special solution is carried out according
to surgical planning. My preference of solution is a serum of 1000mL, plus 2mg of
epinephrine—or 2mg per 1000mL. Usually, at this volume, the abdomen and lateral sides of the torso can be inltrated as well. The inltration is performed at two
levels on two areas:
1. In all the regions where liposuction is performed, the inltration is deep (in the
lamellar layer, below the fascia supercialis)
2. In the area for skin resection, the inltration is carried out in the suprapubic
region underneath the skin and the full thickness of the panniculus (in the areolar
and lamellar layers) (Fig.5.5).
After inltration, the surgeon should wait at least 15min before starting the liposuction procedure, which is performed at two levels in those two previously demarcated areas:
1. Full-thickness liposuction is conducted on all the areas in the suprapubic region
and below the umbilicus (Fig.5.5). Afterward, the perforator vessels and connective tissues are preserved, and that area becomes deep because of the absence
of adipose tissue (Fig.5.6).
2. Deep liposuction (below the fascia supercial) is performed on all the regions
where the abdominal panniculus remains with its normal cutaneous covering.
Therefore, all the adipose tissue in the lamellar layer is aspirated (Fig.5.7). I
already described that liposuction must rst be performed on half of the abdominal wall until the ideal thickness has been reached. The other side undergoes
liposuction only after the rst procedure has concluded. Thus, the surgeon may

bc
5 The Beginning, Development, and Current Status of Lipoabdominoplasty: New…
https://t.me/medicina_free
95
abc
d
ef
Fig. 5.5 Sequential drawing showing the technique of full lipoabdominoplasty. (a) Preoperatory
demarcation of the area of skin resection, even my triangular incisions around the umbilicus; (b)
liposuction is performed on full-thickness of the panniculus on supra pubic region; (c, d) skin
resection was done following by deep liposuction (below fascia supercialis) on supra umbilical
region; (e) my surgical instrument is placed on the umbilicus in order to demarcate its new location
on the remaining abdominal ap; (f) the superior abdominal panniculus ap is pulled downwards
indicated by arrows and the new umbilical region is already created
a
de
Fig. 5.6 Sequential photos (a–c) and diagrams (d, e) showing liposuction on full lipoabdominoplasty. Photo (a) prole view showing that the suprapubic region until the umbilicus is done in full
thickness of the lamellar (LL) and areolar one (AL); (b) on the same patient one can see a depression in all infra umbilical region, indicated by arrow, caused by absence of the panniculus all over
the region; (c) one can see deep liposuction (below fascia supercialis) (FS) on segment without
cutaneous resection; (d, e) diagrams show that liposuction was done in all thickness of the panniculus on infra umbilical region (indicated by arrow) one can see the perforator vessels (P) coming from rectus abdominalis muscle (RAM), are preserved; (f) photo from inside of the panniculus
during surgery showing perforator vessels are preserved
Соседние файлы в папке @xirurgi_2025
