6 курс / Кардиология / Джон_Кэмм_Болезни_сердца_и_сосудов_2011

84.Le Polain de Waroux J.B., Pouleur A.C., Goffinet C. et al. Func-tional anatomy of aortic regurgitation. Accuracy, prediction of surgical repairability, and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 116 (Suppl. I). - I264-I269.

85.Roman M.J., Rosen S.E., Kramer-Fox R. et al. Prognostic significance of the pattern of aortic root dilation in the Marfan syndrome // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 1993. - Vol. 22. - P. 1470-6.

86.Gelfand E.V., Hughes S., Hauser T.H. et al. Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography //

J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Resonance. - 2006. - Vol. 8. - P. 503-7.

87.Padial L.R., Oliver A., Vivaldi M. et al. Doppler echocardiographic assessment of progression of aortic regurgitation // Am. J. Cardiol. - 1997. - Vol. 80. - P. 306-14.

88.Vaturi M., Porter A., Adler Y. et al. The natural history of aortic valve disease after mitral valve surgery // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 1999. - Vol. 33. - P. 2003-8.

89.Bonow R.O., Lakatos E., Maron B. et al. Serial long-term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function // Circulation. -

1991. - Vol. 84. - P. 1625-35.

90.Detaint D., Messika-Zeitoun D., Maalouf J. et al. Quantitative echocardiographic determinants of clinical outcome in asymptomatic patients with aortic regurgitation: a prospective study // JACC Imaging. - 2008. - Vol. 1. - P. 1-11.

91.Scognamiglio R., Rahimtoola S.H., Fasoli G. et al. Nifedipine in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1994. - Vol. 331. - P. 689-94.

92.Tornos M.P., Olona M., Permanyer-Miralda G. et al. Clinical outcome of severe asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation: a long-term prospective follow-up study // Am. Heart J. - 1995. - Vol. 130. - P. 333-9.

93.Borer J., Hochreiter C., Herrold E. et al. Prediction of indication for valve replacement among asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular performance // Circulation. - 1998. - Vol. 97. - P. 525-34.

94.Davies R.R., Gallo A., Coady M.A. et al. Novel measurements of relative aortic size predicts rupture of thoracic aortic aneurysm // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 81. - P. 169-77.

95.Davies R.R., Kaple R.K., Mandapati D. et al. Natural history of ascending aortic aneurysms in the setting of an unreplaced bicuspid aortic valve // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 83. - P. 1338-44.

96.Legget M.E., Unger T.A., O’Sullivan C.K. et al. Aortic root complications in Marfan syndrome: identification of a lower risk group // Heart. - 1996. - Vol. 75. - P. 389-95.

97.Evangelista A., Tornos P., Sambola A. et al. Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2005. - Vol. 353. - P. 1324-9.

98.Shores J., Berger K.R., Murphy E.A. et al. Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long-term β-adrenergic blockade in Marfan’s syndrome // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1994. - Vol. 330. - P. 1335-41.

99.Brooke B.S., Habashi J.P., Judge D.P. et al. Angiotensin II blockade and aortic-root dilation in Marfan’s syndrome // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2008. - Vol. 358. - P. 2787-95.

100.Chambers J.C., Somerville J., Stone S. et al. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: long-term results of the pioneer series // Circulation. - 1997. - Vol. 96. - P. 2206-14.

101.Carr J.A., Savage E.B. Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques // Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 25. - P. 6-15.

102.Pettersson G.B., Crucean A.C., Savage R. et al. Toward predictable repair of regurgitant aortic valves. A systematic morphology-directed approach to bicomissural repair // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 52. - P. 40-9.

103.Yacoub M.H., Gehle P., Chandrasekaran V. et al. Late results of a valve-preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 1998. - Vol. 115. -

P. 1080-90.

104.David T. Aortic valve repair and aortic valve-sparing operations. In Cohn LH, Edmunds LH Jr (eds.) Cardiac Surgery in the Adult, 2nd edn. - 2003. - New York: McGraw-Hill. - P. 811-23.

105.El Khoury G., Vanoverschelde J.L., Glineur D. et al. Repair of bicuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic regurgitation // Circulation. -

2006. - Vol. 114 (Suppl. 1). - I610-6.

106.Chaliki H., Mohty D., Avierinos J. et al. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function // Circulation. - 2002. - Vol. 106.

-

P. 2687-93.

107.Bhudia A.K., McCarthy P.M., Kumpati G.S. et al. Improved outcomes after aortic valve surgery for chronic aortic regurgitation with severe left ventricular dysfunction // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 49. - P. 1465-71.

108.Tornos P, Sambola A, Permanyer-Miralda G, et al. Long-term outcome of surgically tretaed aortic regurgitation. Influence of guideline adherence toward early surgery // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 47. - P. 1012-17.

109.Klodas E., Enriquez-Sarano M., Tajik A. et al. Surgery for aortic regurgitation in women: contrasting indications and outcomes as compared with men // Circulation. - 1996. - Vol. 94. - P. 2472-8.

110.Dujardin K., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H. et al. Mortality and morbidity of severe aortic regurgitation in clinical practice: a long-term follow up study // Circulation. - 1999. - Vol. 99. - P. 1851-7.

111.Yasuda H., Nakatani S., Stugaard M. et al. Failure to prevent progressive dilation of ascending aorta by aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with tricuspid aortic valve // Circulation. - 2003. - Vol. 108 (Suppl. 1). - II291-I1294.

112.Patel N.D., Weiss E.S., Alejo D.E. et al. Aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: a comparison of the Bentall and valve-sparing procedures // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 85. - P. 2003-10; discussion 2010-1.

113.Scognamiglio R., Negut C., Palisi M. et al. Long-term survival and functional results after aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 45. - P. 1025-30.

114.Roberts W.C., Virmani R. Aschoff bodies at necropsy in valvular heart disease. Evidence from an analysis of 543 patients over 14 years of age that rheumatic heart disease, at least anatomically is a disease of the mitral valve // Circulation. - 1978. - Vol. 57. - P. 803-7.

115.Nakhjavan F.K., Katz M.R., Maranhao V. et al. Analysis of influence of catecholamine and tachycardia during supine exercise in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm // Br. Heart J. - 1969. - Vol. 31. - P. 753-61.

116.Schwammenthal E., Vered Z., Agranat O. et al. Impact of atrioventricular compliance on pulmonary artery pressure in mitral stenosis. An exercise echocardiographic study // Circulation. - 2001. - Vol. 102. -

P. 2378-84.

117.Remetz M.S., Cleman M.W., Cabin HS. Pulmonary and pleural complications of cardiac disease // Clin. Chest. Med. - 1989. - Vol. 10. -

P. 545-59.

118.Messika-Zeitoun D., Brochet E., Holmin C. et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the mitral valve area and commissural opening before and after percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in patients with mitral stenosis // Eur. Heart J. - 2007. - Vol. 28. - P. 72-9.

119.Wilkins G.T., Weyman A.E., Abascal .VM. et al. Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve: an analysis of echocardiographic variables related to outcome and the mechanism of dilatation // Br. Heart J. - 1988. - Vol. 60. - P. 299-308.

120.Iung B., Cormier B., Ducimetiere P. et al. Immediate results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy // Circulation. - 1996. - Vol. 94. -

P. 2124-30.

121.Sagie A., Freitas N., Chen M.H. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis and its associated valvular lesions in 205 patients and lack of association with mitral valve prolapse // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. - 1997. - Vol. 10. - P. 141-8.

122.Reis G., Motta M.S., Barbosa M.M. et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment and risk stratification of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 43. - P. 393-401.

123.Leavitt J.I., Coats M.H., Falk R.H.. Effects of exercise on transmitral gradient and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with mitral stenosis or a prosthetic mitral valve: a Doppler echocardiographic study //

J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 1991. - Vol. 17. - P. 1520-6.

124.Messika-Zeitoun D., Serfaty J.M., Laissy J.P. et al. Assessment of the mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis by multislice computed tomography // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 48. - P. 41113.

125.Horskötte D., Niehaus R., Strauer B.E. Pathomorphological aspects, aetiology and natural history of acquired mitral valve stenosis // Eur. Heart J. - 1991. - Vol. 12 (Suppl. B). - P. 55-60.

126.Chiang C.W., Lo S.K., Ko Y.S., et al. Predictors of systemic embolism in patients with mitral stenosis. A prospective study // Ann. Intern. Med. - 1998. - Vol. 128. - P. 885-9.

127.Fuster V., Ryden L.E., Cannom D.S. et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report by the America College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients and Atrial Fibrillation) // Eur. Heart J. - 2006. - Vol. 27. - P. 1976-2030.

128.Vahanian A., Cormier B., Iung B. Mitral valvuloplasty. In Topol E (ed.) Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, 5th edn. - 2007. - Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier. - P. 879-93.

129.Chen C.R., Cheng T.O. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty by the Inoue technique: a multicenter study of 4832 patients in China // Am. Heart J. - 1995. - Vol. 129. - P. 1197-203.

130.Iung B., Nicoud-Houel A., Fondard O. et al. Temporal trends in percutaneous mitral commissurotomy over a 15-year period // Eur. Heart J. - 2004. - Vol. 25. - P. 702-8.

131.Zimmet AD, Almeida AA, Harper RW, et al. Predictors of surgery after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2006. -

Vol. 82. - P. 828-33.

132.Choudhary S.K., Talwar S., Venugopal P. Severe mitral regurgitation after percutaneous transmitral commissurotomy: underestimated subvalvular disease // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 13. -

P. 927.

133.Iung B., Garbarz E., Michaud P. et al. Late results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in a series of 1024 patients. Analysis of late clinical deterioration: frequency, anatomic findings and predictive factors // Circulation. - 1999. - Vol. 99. - P. 3272-8.

134.Song H., Kang D.H., Kim J.H. et al. Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty versus surgical treatment in mitral stenosis with severe tricuspid regurgitation // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 116 (Suppl. I). - P. 246-50.

135.Palacios I.F., Sanchez P.L., Harrell L.C. et al. Which patients benefit from percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty? Prevalvuloplasty and postvalvuloplasty variables that predict long-term outcome // Circulation. - 2002. - Vol. 105. - P. 1465-71.

136.Kim M.J., Song J.K., Song J.M. et al. Long-term outcomes of significant mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114. - P. 2815-22.

137.Fawzy M.E., Shoukri M., Al Buraiki J. et al. Seventeen years’ clinical and echocardiographic follow up of mitral balloon valvuloplasty in 520 patients, and predictors of long-term outcome // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2007. - Vol. 16. - P. 454-60.

138.Fawzy M.E., Hassan W., Shoukri M. et al. Immediate and long-term results of mitral balloon valvotomy for restenosis following previous surgical or balloon mitral commissurotomy // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2005. -

Vol. 96. - P. 971-5.

139.Langerveld J., van Hemel N.M., Kelder J.C. et al. Long-term follow-up of cardiac rhythm after percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. Does atrial fibrillation persist? // Europace. - 2003. - Vol. 5. - P. 47-53.

140.John S., Bashi V.V., Jairai P.S. et al. Closed mitral valvotomy: early results and long-term follow up of 3724 consecutive patients // Circulation. - 1983. - Vol. 68. - P. 891-6.

141.Antunes M.J., Vieira H., Ferrao de Oliveira J. Open mitral commissurotomy: the ‘golden standard’ // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2000. - Vol. 9. - P. 472-7.

142.Hammermeister K., Sethi G.K., Henderson W.G. et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 36. - P. 1152-8.

143.Ben Farhat M., Ayari M., Maatouk F. et al. Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy: seven-year follow-up results of a randomized trial // Circulation. - 1998. - Vol. 97.

-

P. 245-50.

144.Kothari S.S., Ramakrishnan S., Kumar C.K. et al. Intermediate-term results of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy in children less than 12 years of age // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. - 2005. -

Vol. 64. - P. 487-90.

145.Iung B., Garbarz E., Doutrelant L. et al. Late results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy for calcific mitral stenosis // Am. J. Cardiol. -

2000. - Vol. 85. - P. 1308-14.

146.Iung B., Garbarz E., Michaud P. et al. Percutaneous mitral commissurotomy for restenosis after surgical commissurotomy: late efficacy and implications for patient selection // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2000.

-

Vol. 35. - P. 1295-330.

147.Sutaria N., Elder A.T., Shaw T.R.D. Long term outcome of percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy in patients aged 70 and over // Heart. -

2000. - Vol. 83. - P. 433-8.

148.Mills W.R., Barber J.E., Ratliff J.F. et al. Biomechanical and echocardiographic characterization of flail mitral leaflet due to myxomatous disease: further evidence for early surgical intervention // Am. Heart J. - 2004. - Vol. 148. - P. 144-50.

149.Nesta F., Leyne M., Yosefy C. et al. New locus for autosomal dominant mitral valve prolapse on chromosome 13. Clinical insights from genetic studies // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 112. - P. 2022-30.

150.Trochu J.N., Kyndt F., Schott J.J. et al. Clinical characteristics of a familial inherited myxomatous valvular dystrophy mapped to Xq28 // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 35. - P. 1890-7.

151.He S., Fontaine A.A., Schwammenthal E. et al. An integrated mechanism for functional mitral regurgitation: leaflet restriction vs. coapting force - in vivo studies // Circulation 96. - P. 1826-34.

152.Chaput M., Handschumacher M.D., Tournoux H. et al. Mitral leaflet adaptation to ventricular remodelling: occurrence and adequacy in patients with functional mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2008.

-

Vol. 118. - P. 845-53.

153.Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery: the “French correction” // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 1983. - Vol. 86. - P. 323-37.

154.Yellin E., Yoran C., Sonnenblick E. et al. Dynamic changes in the canine mitral regurgitant orifice area during ventricular ejection // Circ. Res. - 1979. - Vol. 45. - P. 677-83.

155.Yoran C., Yellin E.L., Becker R. et al. Dynamic aspects of acute mitral regurgitation: effects of ventricular volume, pressure and contractility on the effective regurgitant orifice area // Circulation1979. - Vol. 60. -

P. 170-6.

156.Levine R.A. Dynamic mitral regurgitation - more than meets the eye // N. Eng. J. Med. - 2004. - Vol. 351. - P. 1681-4.

157.Zile M.R., Tomita M., Nakna K. et al. Effects of left ventricular volume overload procedure by mitral regurgitation on diastolic function // Am. J. Physiol. - 1991. - Vol. 261: H1471-H1480.

158.Matsuo T, Carabello BA, Nagatomo Y, et al. Mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy in canine volume overload // Am. J. Physiol. - 1998. - Vol. 275: H65-H74.

159.Mehta R.H., Supiano M.A., Grossman P.M. et al. Changes in systemic sympathetic nervous system activity after mitral valve surgery and their relationship to changes in left ventricular size and systolic performance in patients with mitral regurgitation // Am. Heart J. - 2004. - Vol. 147. - P. 729-35.

160.Urabe Y., Mann D.L., Kent R.L. et al. Cellular and ventricular contractile dysfunction in experimental canine mitral regurgitation // Circ. Res. - 1992. - Vol. 70. - P. 131-47.

161.Piérard L.A., Lancellotti P. The role of ischemic mitral regurgitation in the pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2004. - Vol. 35. - P. 1627-34.

162.Desjardins V., Enriquez-Sarano M., Tajik A. et al. Intensity or murmurs correlates with severity of valvular regurgitation // Am. J. Med. -

1996. - Vol. 100. - P. 149-56.

163.Monin J.L., Dehant P., Roiron C. et al. Functional assessment of mitral regurgitation by transthoracic echocardiography using standardized imaging planes: diagnostic accuracy and outcome implications // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 302-9.

164.Agricola E., Oppizzi M., Pisani M. et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and echocardiographic classification // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. - 2008. - Vol. 9. - P. 207-27.

165.Valocik G, Kamp O, Visser CA. Three-dimensional echocardiography in mitral valve disease // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. - 2005. - Vol. 6. - P. 443-54.

166.Grayburn P., Fehske W., Omran H. et al. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta // Am. J. Cardiol. - 1994. -

Vol. 74. - P. 912-91.

167.Enriquez-Sarano M., Seward J., Bailey K. et al. Effective regurgitant orifice area: A noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 1994. - Vol. 23. - P. 443-51.

168.Recusani F., Bargiggia G.S., Yoganathan A.P. et al. A new method for quantification of regurgitant flow rate using color Doppler flow imaging of the flow convergence region proximal to a discrete orifice: an in vitro study // Circulation. - 1991. - Vol. 83. - P. 594-604.

169.Grigioni F., Enriquez-Sarano M., Zehr K.J. et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment // Circulation. - 2001. - Vol. 103. -

P. 1759-64.

170.Lee R., Marwick T.H. Assessment of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in asymptomatic mitral regurgitation // Eur. J. Echocardiography. - 2007. - Vol. 8. - P. 175-84.

171.Detaint D., Messika-Zeitoun D., Avierinos J.F. et al. B-type natriuretic peptide in organic mitral regurgitation: determinants and impact on outcome // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 111. - P. 2391-7.

172.Messika-Zeitoun D., Johnson B.D., Nkomo V. et al. Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing determination of functional capacity in mitral regurgitation // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 47. - P. 2521-7.

173.Lee R., Haluska B., Leung D.Y. et al. Functional and prognostic implications of left ventricular contractile reserve in patients with asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation // Heart. - 2005. - Vol. 91. -

P. 1407-12.

174.Lebrun F., Lancellotti P., Piérard LA. Quantitation of functional mitral regurgitation during bicycle exercise in patients with heart failure // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2001. - Vol. 38. - P. 1685-92.

175.Lancellotti P., Gérard P., Piérard L.A. Long-term outcome of patients with heart failure and dynamic functional mitral regurgitation // Eur. Heart J. - 2005. - Vol. 26. - P. 1528-32.

176.Lancellotti P., Stainier P.Y., Lebois F. et al. Effects of dynamic changes in left ventricular synchronicity on dynamic mitral regurgitation // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 96. - P. 1304-7.

177.Avierinos J.-F., Detaint D., Messika-Zeitoun D. et al. Risk, determinants, and outcome implications of progression of mitral regurgitation after diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse in a single community // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 101. - P. 662-7.

178.Enriquez-Sarano M., Avierinos J.F., Messika-Zeitoun D, et al. Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation // N. Engl. J. Med. - 2005. - Vol. 352. - P. 875-83.

179.Rosenhek H., Rader F., Klaar U. et al. Outcome of watchful waiting in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 113. - P. 2238-44.

180.Grigioni F., Avierinos J.F., Ling L.H. et al. Atrial fibrillation complicating the course of degenerative mitral regurgitation. Determinants and long term outcome // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2002. - Vol. 40. -

P. 84-92.

181.Bursi F., Enriquez-Sarano M., Nkomo V.T. et al. Heart failure and death after myocardiac infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 111. - P. 295-301.

182.Amigoni M., Meris A., Then J.J. et al. Mitral regurgitation in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: prognostic significance and relation to ventricular size and function // Eur. Heart J. - 2007. - Vol. 28. - P. 326-33.

183.Trichon B.H., Felker M., Shaw L.K. et al. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2003. - Vol. 91. - P. 538-43.

184.Carabello B.A. The current therapy for mitral regurgitation // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 52. - P. 319-26.

185.Grayburn P.A. Vasodilator therapy for chronic aortic and mitral regurgitation // Am. J. Med Sci. - 2000. - Vol. 320. - P. 202-8.

186.Nemoto S., Hamawaki M., Freitas D.G. et al. Differential effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril versus the beta-adrenergic receptor blocker atenolol on hemodynamics and left ventricular contractile function in experimental mitral regurgitation //

J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2002. - Vol. 40. - P. 149-54.

187.Ellis S.G., Whitlow P.L., Raymond R.E. et al. Impact of mitral regurgitation on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2002. - Vol. 89. - P. 315-18.

188.Feldman T., Wasserman H.S., Hermann H.C. et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge- to-edge technique: six-month results of the EVEREST phase 1 clinical trial // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2005. -

Vol. 46. - P. 2134-40.

189.Rosengart T.K., Feldman T., Borger M.A. et al. Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anaesthesia, council on clinical cardiology, functional genomics and translational biology interdisciplinary working group, and quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary working group // Circulation. - 2008. - Vol. 117. - P. 1750-67.

190.St John Sutton M.G., Plappert T., Abraham W.T. et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular size and function in chronic heart failure // Circulation. - 2003. - Vol. 107. - P. 1985-90.

191.Ypenburg C., Lancellotti P., Tops L.F. et al. Acute effects of initiation and withdrawal of cardiac resynchronisation therapy on papillary muscle dyssynchrony and mitral regurgitation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 50. - P. 2071-7.

192.Horstkotte D., Schulte H.D., Niehues R, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations in acute, severe mitral regurgitation: experience in 42 consecutive patients entering the intensive care unit with pulmonary edema // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 1993. - Vol. 2. - P. 512-22.

193.Perier P., Hohenberger W., Lakew F. et al. Toward a new paradigm for the reconstruction of posterior leaflet prolapse: midterm results of the ‘respect rather than resect’ approach // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008.

-

Vol. 86. - P. 718-25.

194.De Bonis M., Lorusso R., Lapenna E. et al. Similar long-term results of mitral valve repair for anterior compared with posterior leaflet prolapse // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 131. - P. 364-70.

195.Zegdi R., Debièche M., Latrémouille C. et al. Long-term results of mitral valve repair in active endocarditis // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 111. - P. 2532-6.

196.Chauvaud S., Fuzellier J.F., Berrebi A. et al. Long-term (29 years) results of reconstructive surgery in rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency // Circulation. - 2001. - Vol. 104(12 Suppl.1). - I12-I15.

197.Braun J., Van der Weire N., Klautz R.J.N. et al. Restrictive mitral annuloplasty cures ischemic mitral regurgitation and heart failure // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 85. - P. 430-7.

198.Acker M.A., Bolling S., Shemin R. et al. Mitral valve surgery in heart failure: insights from the Acorn. Clinical. Trial // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 132. - P. 568-77.

199.Suma H., Tanabe H., Uejima T. et al. Selected ventriculoplasty for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with advanced congestive heart failure: midterm results and risk analysis // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. -

2007. - Vol. 32. - P. 912-16.

200.Gammie J.S., O’Brien S.M., Griffith B.P. et al. Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 115. - P. 881-7.

201.Raanani E., Albage A., David T.E. et al. The efficacy of the Cox/maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery: a matched control study // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. - 2001. - Vol. 19. - P. 438-42.

202.Tribouilloy C.M., Enriquez-Sarano M., Schaff H.V. et al. Impact of preoperative symptoms on survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation: rationale for optimizing surgical implications // Circulation. - 1999. - Vol. 99. - P. 400-5.

203.Russo A., Grigoni F., Avierinos A.F. et al. Thromboembolic complications after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation incidence, predictors, and clinical implications // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2008. - Vol. 51. - P. 1203-11.

204.Detaint D., Thoralf M., Sundt M.D. et al. Surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in the elderly: Outcomes and recent improvements // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114. - P. 258-60.

205.Mohty D., Orszulak T.A., Schaff H.V. et al. Very long-term survival and durability of mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse // Circulation. - 2001. - Vol. 104 (Suppl. 1). - I1-17.

206.Braunberger E., Deloche A., Berrebi A. et al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier’s techniques in non-rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency // Circulation. - 2001. - Vol. 104: I8-I11.

207.Eguchi K., Ohtaki E., Matsumura T. et al. Pre-operative atrial fibrillation as the key determinant of outcome of mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation // Eur. Heart J. - 2005. - Vol. 26. -

P. 1866-72.

208.Suri R.M., Schaff H.V., Dearani J.A. et al. Survival advantage and improved durability of mitral repair for leaflet prolapse subsets in the current era // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 82. - P. 655-63.

209.Dumont E., Gillinov A.M., Blackstone E.H. et al. Reoperation after mitral valve repair for degenerative disease // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 84. - P. 444-50.

210.Iung B., Rousseau-Pauziaud J., Cormier B. et al. Contemporary results of mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 43. - P. 386-92.

211.Ray S., Chambers J., Gohlke-Baerwolf C. et al. Mitral valve repair for severe mitral regurgitation: the way forward? // Eur. Heart J. - 2006. -

Vol. 27. - P. 2925-8.

212.Grossi E.A., Goldberg J.D., Lapietra. et al. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2001. - Vol. 122. - P. 1107-24.

213.Mallidi H.R., Pelletier M.P., Lamb J. et al. Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 127. - P. 636-44.

214.Fukui T., Takanashi S., Tabata M. et al. Mild or moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting // J. Card. Surg. - 2007. - Vol. 22. - P. 480-5.

215.Serri K., Bouchard D., Demers P. et al. Is a good perioperative echocardiographic result predictive of durability in ischemic mitral valve repair? // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 13. - P. 565-73.

216.Mihaljevic T., Lam B.-K., Rajeswaran J. et al. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation // Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2007. - Vol. 49. - P. 2191-201.

217.Kang D.H., Kim M.J., Kang S.J. et al. Mitral valve repair versus revascularization alone in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114 (Suppl. 1). - I499-I503.

218.Wu A.H., Aaronson K.D., Bolling S.F. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty on mortality risk in patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2005. -

Vol. 45. - P. 381-87.

219.Gelsomino S., Lorusso R., De Cicco G. et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation // Eur. Heart J. - 2008. - Vol. 29. - P. 231-40.

220.McGee E.C., Gillinov A.M., Blackstone E.H. et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 128. - P. 916-24.

221.Zhu F., Otsuji Y., Yotsumoto G. et al. Mechanism of persistant ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty - importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering // Circulation. - 2006. -

Vol. 114 (Suppl. 1). - P. 1529-34.

222.Hung J., Papakostas L., Tahta S.A. et al. Mechanism of recurrent mitral ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target // Circulation. - 2004. - Vol. 110

(11 Suppl.1). - II85-I190.

223.Crabtree T.D., Bailey M.S., Moon M.R. et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation and risk factors for early and late mortality after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 85. - P. 1537-43.

224.Bolling S.F. Mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2002. - Vol. 11 (Suppl. 1) - S26-S31.

225.Gummert J.F., Rahmel A., Bucerius et al. Mitral valve repair in patients with end stage cardiomyopathy: who benefits? // Eur. J. Cardiothoracic. Surg. - 2003. - Vol. 23. - P. 1017-22.

226.Magne J., Pibarot P., Dagenais F. et al. Preoperative posterior leaflet angle accurately predicts outcome after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 115. - P. 782-91.

227.Jensen M.O., Jensen H., Smerup M. et al. Saddle-shaped mitral valve annuloplasty rings experience lower forces compared with flat rings // Circulation. - 2008. - Vol. 118 (Suppl. 14). - S250-S255.

228.Russo A., Suri R.M., Grigioni F. et al. Clinical outcome after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation due to papillary muscle rupture // Circulation. - 2008. - Vol. 118. - P. 1528-34.

229.Mirabel M., Iung B., Baron G. et al. What are the characteristics of patients with severe, symptomatic, mitral regurgitation who are denied surgery? // Eur. Heart J. - 2007. - Vol. 28. - P. 1358-65.

230.Detaint D., Iung B., Lepage L. et al. Management of asymptomatic patients with severe nonischaemic mitral regurgitation. Are practices consistent with guidelines? // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 34. - P. 937-42.

231.Lancellotti P., Marwick T., Piérard L.A. How to manage ischaemic mitral regurgitation // Heart. - 2008. - Vol. 94. - P. 1497-502.

232.Pelikka P., Tajuk A., Khandheria B. et al. Carcinoid heart disease. Clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients // Circu-lation. - 1993. - Vol. 87. - P. 1188-96.

233.Parris T.M., Panidis I.P., Ross J. et al. Doppler echocardiographic findings in rheumatic tricuspid stenosis // Am. J. Cardiol. - 1987. - Vol. 60. - P. 1414-16.

234.Rivera R., Duran E., Ajuria M. Carpentier’s flexible ring verus De Vega annuloplasty. A prospective randomized study // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 1985. - Vol. 89. - P. 196-203.

235.Filsoufi F., Anyanwu A.C., Salzberg S.P. et al. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2005. - Vol. 80. - P. 845-50.

236.Ton-Nu T.T., Levine R.A., Handschumacher M.D. et al. Geometric determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation: insights from 3-dimensional echocardiography // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114. - P. 143-49.

237.Moss R., Munt B. Injection drug use and right-sided endocarditis // Heart. - 2003. - Vol. 89. - P. 57781.

238.Tribouilloy C.M., Enriquez-Sarano M., Bailey K.R. et al. Quan-tification of tricuspid regurgitation by measuring the width of the vena contracta with Doppler color flow imaging: a clinical study // J. Am. Coll.Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 36. - P. 472-8.

239.Tribouilloy C.M., Enriquez-Sarano M., Capps M.A. et al. Contrasting effect of similar effective regurgitant orifice area in mitral and tricuspid regurgitation: a quantitative Doppler echocardiographic study //

J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. - 2002. - Vol. 15. - P. 958-65.

240.Kim H.K., Him Y.J., Park J.S. et al. Determinants of the severity of functional tricuspid regurgitation // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 98. - P. 236-42.

241.Messika-Zeitoun D., Thomson H., Bellamy M. et al. Medical and surgical outcome of tricuspid regurgitation caused by flail leaflets //

J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 128. - P. 296-302.

242.Dreyfus G., Corbi P.J., John C.K.M. et al. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2005. - Vol. 79. - P. 127-32.

243.Izumi C., Iga K., Konishi T. Progression of isolated tricuspid regurgitation late after mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2002. - Vol. 11. - P. 353-6.

244.Matsunaga A., Duran C.M. Progression of tricuspid regurgitation after repaired functional ischemic mitral regurgitation // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 112 (Suppl. 9). - I-453-I457.

245.Henein M.Y., O’Sullivan C.A., Li W. et al. Evidence for rheumatic valve disease in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation long after mitral valve surgery: the role of 3D echo reconstruction // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2003. - Vol. 12. - P. 566-72.

246.Rizzoli G., Vendramin I., Nesseris G. et al. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 77. - P. 1607-14.

247.Dreyfus G.D., Raja S.G., John Chan K.M. Tricuspid leaflet augmentation to address severe tethering in functional tricuspid regurgitation // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 34. - P. 908-10.

248.Tang G.H.L., David T.E., Singh S.K. et al. Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes // Circulation. - 2006. - Vol. 114 (Suppl. 1). - I577-I581.

249.McCarthy P.M., Bhudia S.K., Rajeswaren J. et al. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2004. - Vol. 127. - P. 674-85.

250.Fukuda S., Song J.M., Gillinov M. et al. Tricuspid valve tethering predicts residual tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplasty // Circulation. - 2005. - Vol. 111. - P. 975-9.

251.Kwon D.A., Park J.S., Chang H.J. et al. Prediction of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve surgery and role of tricuspid annular systolic velocity // Am. J. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 98. - P. 659-61.

252.Bernal J.M., Morales D., Revuelta C. et al. Reoperations after tricuspid valve repair // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2005. - Vol. 130. -

P. 498-503.

253.Dunning J., Graham R.J., Thambyrajah J. et al. Stentless vs. stented aortic valve bioprostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial // Eur. Heart J. - 2007. - Vol. 28. - P. 2369-74.

254.Pavoni D., Badano L.P., Ius F. et al. Limited long-term durability of the cryolife O’Brien stentless porcine xenograft valve // Circu-lation. - 2007. - Vol. 116 (Suppl. I) - I-307-I-313.

255.O’Brien M.F., Hancock S., Stafford E.G. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow-up of 1,022 valve replacements // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 2001. - Vol. 10. - P. 334-44.

256.Smedira N.G., Blackstone E.H., Roselli E.E. et al. Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration of allograft and pericardial prostheses // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. -

2006. - Vol. 131. - P. 558-64.

257.Nowicki E.R., Petersson G.B., Smedira N.G. et al. Aortic allograft valve reoperation: surgical challenges and patient risks // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 86. - P. 761-8.

258.Hanke T., Stierle U., Boehm J.O. et al. Autograft regurgitation and aortic root dimensions after the Ross procedure: the German Ross Registry experience // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 116 (Suppl. 11). - I251-258.

259.Frigiola A., Ranucci M., Carlucci C. et al. The Ross procedure in adults: long-term follow-up and echocardiographic changes leading to pulmonary autograft reoperation // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 86. - P. 482-9.

260.Laforest I., Dumesnil J.G., Briand M. et al. Hemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement: comparison of pulmonary autografts versus aortic homografts // Circulation. - 2002. - Vol. 106(12 Suppl.1). - I-57-I-62.

261.Bakir I., Casselman F.P., Wellens F. et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 81. - P. 1599-604.

262.Casselman F.P., Van Slycke S., Wellens F. et al. Mitral valve surgery can now routinely be performed endoscopically // Circulation. - 2003. - Vol. 108 (Suppl. II) - II48-II54.

263.Chitwood W.R. Jr., Rodriguez E., Chu M.W. et al. Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 136. - P. 436-41.

264.Akins C.W., Miller C., Turina M.I. et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 135. - P. 732-8.

265.Oxenham H., Bloomfield P., Wheatley D.J. et al. Twenty-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses // Heart. - 2003. - Vol. 89. - P. 715-21.

266.Butchart E.G., Li H.H., Payne N. et al. Twenty years experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2001. - Vol. 121. - P. 1090-100.

267.Peterseim D.S., Chen Y.Y., Cheruvu S. Long-term outcome after biological versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients //

J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 1999. - Vol. 117. - P. 890-7.

268.Grunkemeier G.L., Li H.H., Starr A. Heart valve replacement: a statistical review of 35 years results // J. Heart Valve Dis. - 1999. - Vol. 8. - P. 466-71.

269.Svennevig J.L., Abdelnoor M., Nitter-Hauge S. Twenty-five-year experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis in the aortic position. A follow-up cohort study of 816 consecutive patients // Circulation. - 2007. - Vol. 116. - P. 1795-800.

270.Bagger J.P., Edwards M.B., Taylor K.M. Influence of socioeconomic status on survival after primary aortic or mitral valve replacement // Heart. - 2008. - Vol. 94. - P. 182-5.

271.Lund O., Bland M. Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 132. - P. 20-6.

272.Chan V., Jamieson R.E., German E. et al. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses assessed by composites of valve-related complications to 15 years after aortic valve replacement // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2006. - Vol. 131. - P. 1267-73.

273.Brown M.L., Schaff H.V., Lahr B.D. et al. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biological prostheses // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 2008. -

Vol. 135. - P. 878-84.

274.Schelbert E.B., Vaughan-Sarrazin M.S., Welke K.F. et al. Valve type and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement in older patients // Heart. - 2008. - Vol. 94. - P. 1181-8.

275.Orszulak T.A., Schaff H.V., Puga F.J. Event status of the Starr-Edwards aortic valve to 20 years: a benchmark for comparison // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 1997. - Vol. 63. - P. 620-6.

276.Murday A/, Hochstitzky A., Mansfield J. et al. A prospective randomized trial of St. Jude versus StarrEdwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses // Ann. Thorac. Surg. - 2003. - Vol. 76. - P. 66-74.

277.Grunkemeier G.L., Li H.H., Naftel D.C. et al. Long term performance of heart valve prosthesis // Curr Probl Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 25. - P. 73-154.

278.Saour J.N., Sieck J.O., Mamo L.A.R. et al. Trial of different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves //

N. Engl. J. Med. - 1990. - Vol. 322. - P. 428-32.

279.Altman R., Rouvier J., Gurfinkel E. et al. Comparison of two levels of anticoagulant therapy in patients with substitute heart valves //

J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. - 1991. - Vol. 101. - P. 427-31.

280.Acar J., Iung B., Boissel J.P. et al. AREVA: multicenter randomized comparison of low-dose vs. standard dose anticoagulation in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves // Circulation. - 1996. - Vol. 94. - P. 2107-12.

281.Hering D., Piper C., Bergemann B. et al. Anticoagulation study valve replacement: results of the German experience with low-intensity thromboembolic and bleeding complications following // St. Jude Medical. Chest. - 2005. - Vol. 127. - P. 53-9.

282.Turpie A.G.G., Gent M., Laupacis A. et al. A comparison of aspirin with placebo in patients treated with warfarin after heart valve replacement // N. Engl. J. Med. - 1993. - Vol. 329. - P. 524-9.