Добавил:
Upload Опубликованный материал нарушает ваши авторские права? Сообщите нам.
Вуз: Предмет: Файл:

Fin management materials / 11 P4AFM-Session13_j08

.pdf
Скачиваний:
38
Добавлен:
13.03.2015
Размер:
427.95 Кб
Скачать

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

6.4Comparison of futures with forward contracts

 

Forward contract

Futures contract

 

 

 

Credit risk

Users have to be wary of the

Credit risk is virtually

 

credit risk of the other party

eliminated as the clearing

 

in every deal

house guarantees deals

 

 

through the margin system

 

 

 

Credit lines

Credit lines with bank are

Credit lines with banks can be

 

used

kept free

 

 

 

Size

A deal is for whatever size

Standard contracts are traded

 

and date the parties agree

for fixed amounts and

 

 

delivery periods

 

 

 

Margin

No margin generally required

Users have to deposit initial

 

 

margin

 

 

 

Settlement

Usually physical delivery

Usually via offset

 

 

 

Basis risk

Not applicable

Exists

 

 

 

Cash flow

On delivery date

Gains/losses accrue over life

 

 

of hedge

 

 

 

1321

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

7CURRENCY SWAPS

Definition

A currency swap is a formal agreement between two parties to exchange principal and interest payments in different currencies over a stated time period.

¾Currency swaps can be used:

to obtain foreign currency loans at lower interest rates than via direct borrowing in overseas markets.

to eliminate transaction risk on existing foreign currency loans e.g. on Eurobonds.

¾The steps are as follows:

On commencement of the swap; an exchange of agreed principal amounts, usually at the prevailing spot rate.

Over the life of the swap; an exchange of interest payments.

At the end of the swap; a re-exchange of principals, usually at the original spot rate (thereby removing foreign currency risk).

Illustration 3

Consider a UK company wishing to borrow dollars to finance an investment project in the US. If the UK firm is not well known in the US money markets it might have to pay higher interest rates on the dollar than a similar US company, To mitigate this problem the UK company could (via an international bank) locate a US company facing the opposite situation on borrowing sterling. The two parties could then arrange the following swap.

(a)The US company borrows dollars and the UK firm borrows an equivalent amount of sterling. The two parties then swap funds at the current spot rate i.e. there is a swap of principals

(b)The US company agrees to pay the UK company the annual interest on the sterling loan. In return the UK company pays the interest on the dollar loan.

(c)At the end of the period the two parties then swap back the principal amounts. This could be at prevailing spot rates or at a predetermined rate (e.g. the original spot rate) in order to eliminate foreign exchange transaction exposure.

By following the above procedure each party has taken advantage of the other’s credit rating in its local capital markets and therefore reduced its financing costs.

1322

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

¾Foreign exchange/FX swaps – where there is a swap of currencies between counterparties but no swap of interest. The key advantage is avoiding the transaction costs of exchanging currency on the market. Two variations are common:

“spot against forward” – where the counterparties swap principals today at spot rate and then re-exchange on a set date at forward rate

“forward against forward” – where both legs of the deal are performed at the forward rate.

Key points

The favoured method of forecasting long-term exchange rate changes is relative purchasing power parity theory. Short term fluctuations may have a closer connection with interest rate parity – indeed IRP is used to set forward rates.

Although three types of currency risk may affect a firm (translation, economic and transaction) only two of them need to be hedged (economic and transaction) and from these only one can be easily hedged (transaction).

Practical internal hedging techniques should of course be considered before even considering the use of derivatives.

The most “mysterious” of derivatives is the futures contract as physical delivery is very rare - most participants close out their positions before the delivery date and therefore do not actually exchange currency using the contract but take a gain/loss on the change in contract’s price.

FOCUS

You should now be able to:

¾discuss the determinants of foreign exchange rates;

¾discuss the various types of currency risk and internal methods of currency risk management;

¾evaluate external hedging scenarios using forward foreign exchange contracts, money markets, foreign currency options, foreign currency futures and swaps.

1323

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

EXAMPLE SOLUTIONS

Solution 1

 

(1+ h )

S1 = S0 x

 

c

 

(1+ hb )

 

(1

+ 0.02)

S1 = 1.90 x

 

 

(1

+ 0.03)

= $1.88 to £1

This is a predicted fall in the value of sterling.

Solution 2

F0 = S0 x ((1+ ic )) 1+ ib

(1 + 0.0325) F0 = 1.78 x (1 + 0.045)

= $1.76 to £1

Sterling is weaker in the forward market than the spot market

Solution 3

(a) Forward rate

= 1.5245 + 0.0214

 

 

= 1.5459

 

$200,000

= £129,374

 

1.5459

 

 

(b)

$200,000

= £130,200

1.5361

 

 

Solution 4

Expected receipt after 3 months = $300,000

Dollar interest rate over three months = 5.4/4 = 1.35%

Dollars to borrow now to have $300,000 liability after 3 months = 300,000/ 1.0135 = $296,004 Spot rate for selling dollars = 1.7820 + 0.0002 = $1.7822 per £

Sterling deposit from borrowed dollars = 296,004/ 1.7822 = £166,089 Sterling interest rate over three months = 4.6/4 = 1.15%

Value in 3 months of sterling deposit = 166,089 x 1.0115 = £167,999

1324

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

Solution 5

(a)$ receivables and hence we will want to sell $ and buy £ - a call option on £ is required. Receipt is in April therefore April call options.

Any exercise price can be chosen - this hedge will be illustrated using 1.610 exercise price.

Number of option contracts required:

Sterling size of hedge

$300,000

= £186,335

1.610

 

 

Number of contracts

£186,335 = 6contractsrequired

 

 

 

£31,250

 

Premium cost = 6 × £31,250 × 2.77 cents =

$5,194

$5.194 @ current spot rate of 1.6119 =

£3,222

(b) (i) Exchange rate 1.625

 

@ spot

$300,000

= £184,615

 

1.625

 

 

 

 

Exercising the option to buy 6 contracts of

 

£31,250 @ 1.610 =

 

$301,875

Only receive $300,000 therefore buy $1,875

 

on spot market @ 1.625 =

£1,154

Under option - receive 6 × £31,250 =

£187,500

Less: cost of additional $

£(1,154)

____________

£186,346

____________

Therefore exercise option

1325

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

(ii) Exchange rate 1.605

@ spot

$300,000

= £186,916

 

1.605

 

 

 

 

Exercising the option to buy 6 contracts of

 

£31,250 @ 1.610 =

$301,875

Only receive $300,000 therefore buy $1,875

 

on spot market @ 1.605 =

£1,168

 

Under option − receive

£187,500

 

Less: cost of additional $

£ (1,168)

_____________

£186,332

_____________

Therefore do not exercise option i.e. sell $ at spot.

Premium is always payable whether the option is exercised or not.

Solution 6

The company needs to protect itself against a rise in the price of the Euro. Therefore it should set up an options position that produces a gain upon a rising Euro i.e. buy calls on the Euro

Number of options required

= exposure/N(d1)

 

 

 

 

 

= 1500/0.5386 = 2785 options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spot

Exposure

Cost

Call option

 

Number of

Market value of option

 

 

 

premium

 

contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

€:£

£

£

 

 

£

0.6900

150,000,000

103,500,000

3158

 

2785 Buy

8,795,030

0.7000

150,000,000

105,000,000

3696.6

 

2785 Sell

10,295,031

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rounding (1)

 

 

(1,500,000)

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

 

 

Gain

1326

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

Solution 7

(a)

KYT needs to purchase yen on the spot market in two months time. To protect against the risk of the yen strengthening against the $US, KYT should buy yen futures contracts, hoping to sell them at a higher price if the yen strengthens. This is intended to offset any loss relative to the current spot rate when the yen are purchased in the spot market in two months time.

Use contracts that mature at the nearest date after 1 September, the September contract. To protect 280 million yen, 22 contracts will need to be bought.

(b)

Basis is the difference between the current spot price and the futures price, in this case Y128·15 – Y125·23 or 2.92 yen. (September futures in terms of yen per $1 = 1/0.007985 = 125.23)

(c)

Basis will be zero at the maturity date of the futures contract,

30 September. If it

reduces in a linear manner, the expected basis on 1 September is

 

2.92

= 0·973 yen

3

 

 

The expected futures price is 0·973 yen below the spot price of 120 = 119·027 or 0·008401Yen/$

Expected result of the hedge:

Spot market

Futures market

30 June

 

30 June

Yen 280m

= $2,184,939

Buy 22 September yen contracts at 0·007985

 

 

(Contracts are for a total of 275,000,000 yen)

1 September

1 September

Yen 280m

= $2, 333, 333

Sell 22 September yen contracts at 0·008401

 

 

Futures gain is 275,000,000 (0·008401 – 0·007985)

 

 

= $114,400

Loss on the spot market = $148, 394

Hedge efficiency is 114,400148,394 = 77%

This result may not occur as basis is unlikely to decrease in a linear manner. Depending on the movement in basis the hedge efficiency might be higher or lower than 77%.

1327

SESSION 13 – FOREIGN EXCHANGE RISK MANAGEMENT

1328

Соседние файлы в папке Fin management materials