- •Introduction
- •General
- •The purposes of the DCFR
- •Contents of the DCFR
- •Revision of the interim outline edition
- •The coverage of the DCFR
- •Structure and language of the DCFR model rules
- •How the DCFR relates to PECL, the SGECC PEL series, the Acquis and the Insurance Contract Group series
- •How the DCFR may be used as preparatory work for the CFR
- •Developments after this edition
- •Academic contributors and funders
- •The pan-European teams
- •The Study Group on a European Civil Code
- •Its Co-ordinating Group
- •The Study Group’s Working Teams
- •The Study Group’s Advisory Councils
- •The Acquis Group
- •The former Commission on European Contract Law
- •The Compilation and Redaction Team
- •Funding
- •Principles
- •The underlying principles of freedom, security, justice and efficiency
- •Freedom
- •Contractual freedom
- •Non-contractual obligations
- •Property
- •Security
- •Contractual security
- •Non-contractual obligations
- •Property
- •Justice
- •Contract
- •Non-contractual obligations
- •Property
- •Efficiency
- •Efficiency for the purposes of the parties
- •Efficiency for wider public purposes
- •Conclusion
- •Table of Destinations
- •Table of Derivations
- •Model Rules
- •Annex
- •Definitions
- •Accessory
- •Acquisition finance device
- •Act of assignment
- •Agent
- •Assets
- •Assignment
- •Authorisation
- •Authority
- •Avoidance
- •Advanced electronic signature
- •Barter, contract for
- •Beneficiary
- •Benevolent intervention in another’s affairs
- •Business
- •Claim
- •Claimant
- •Co-debtorship for security purposes
- •Compensation
- •Complete substitution of debtor
- •Condition
- •Conduct
- •Confidential information
- •Construction, contract for
- •Commercial agency
- •Consumer
- •Consumer contract for sale
- •Contract
- •Contractual obligation
- •Contractual relationship
- •Co-ownership
- •Corporeal
- •Counter-performance
- •Court
- •Creditor
- •Damage
- •Damages
- •Debtor
- •Default
- •Defence
- •Costs
- •Delivery
- •Dependent personal security
- •Design, contract for
- •Direct physical control
- •Distribution contract
- •Distributorship
- •Divided obligation
- •Divided right
- •Donation, contract for
- •Discrimination
- •Durable medium
- •Duty
- •Economic loss
- •Electronic
- •Electronic signature
- •Financial assets
- •Financial instruments
- •Fraudulent
- •Fundamental non-performance
- •Global security
- •Franchise
- •Good faith
- •Good faith and fair dealing
- •Goods
- •Gross negligence
- •Handwritten signature
- •Harassment
- •Immovable property
- •Incomplete substitution of debtor
- •Indemnify
- •Independent personal security
- •Indirect physical control
- •Individually negotiated
- •Ineffective
- •Insolvency proceeding
- •Incorporeal
- •Intangibles
- •Interest
- •Invalid
- •Joint obligation
- •Joint right
- •Juridical act
- •Keeper
- •Limited proprietary rights
- •Limited-right-possessor
- •Loan contract
- •Lease
- •Loss
- •Mandate
- •Mandate for direct representation
- •Mandate for indirect representation
- •Merger of debts
- •Merger clause
- •Monetary loan
- •Movables
- •Negligence
- •Non-economic loss
- •Non-performance
- •Notice
- •Not individually negotiated
- •Obligation
- •Motor vehicle
- •Overdraft facility
- •Owner-possessor
- •Ownership
- •Performance
- •Person
- •Physical control
- •Possession
- •Possession-agent
- •Prescription
- •Presumption
- •Price
- •Proceeds
- •Possessory security right
- •Processing, contract for
- •Producer
- •Property
- •Proprietary security
- •Proprietary security, contract for
- •Public holiday
- •Reasonable
- •Reciprocal
- •Recklessness
- •Rent
- •Reparation
- •Representative
- •Ratify
- •Requirement
- •Resolutive
- •Retention of ownership device
- •Revocation
- •Right
- •Sale, contract for
- •Services, contract for
- •Signature
- •Solidary obligation
- •Solidary right
- •Security right in movable asset
- •Standard terms
- •Storage, contract for
- •Subrogation
- •Substitution of debtor
- •Supply
- •Suspensive
- •Tacit prolongation
- •Termination
- •Textual form
- •Transfer of contractual position
- •Treatment, contract for
- •Trust
- •Term
- •Trustee
- •Truster
- •Unjustified enrichment
- •Valid
- •Void
- •Voidable
- •Withdraw
- •Working days
- •Writing
- •Withholding performance
- •Index
Funding
The DCFR is the result of years of work by many pan-European teams of jurists. They have been financed from diverse sources which cannot all be named here.1 Before we came together with other teams in May 2005 to form the ‘CoPECL Network of Excellence’2 under the European Commission’s sixth framework programme for research, from which funds our research has since been supported, the members of the Study Group on a European Civil Code had the benefit of funding from national research councils. Among others the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) provided over several years the lion’s share of the financing including the salaries of the Working Teams based in Germany and the direct travel costs for the meetings of the Co-ordinating Group and the numerous Advisory Councils. The work of the Dutch Working Teams was financed by the Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). Further personnel costs were met by the Flemish Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk On- derzoek-Vlaanderen (FWO), the Greek Onassis-Foundation, the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, the Portuguese Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian and the Norges forskningsråd (the Research Council of Norway). The Acquis Group received substantial support from its preceding Training and Mobility Networks on ‘Common Principles of European Private Law’ (19972002) under the fourth EU Research Framework Programme3 and
1A complete survey of the donors of the Study Group on a European Civil Code will be found in the opening pages of the most recent volume of the Study Group’s “Principles of European Law (PEL)” series (as to which see para. 54 of the introduction). The donors of the Commission on European Contract Law are mentioned in the preface of both volumes of the Principles of European Contract Law.
2Joint Network on European Private Law (CoPECL: Common Principles of European Contract Law), Network of Excellence under the 6th EU Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development, Priority 7 – FP6-2002-CITIZENS- 3, Contract N8 513351 (co-ordinator: Professor Hans Schulte-Nölke, Osnabrück).
3TMR (Training and Mobility) Network ‘Common Principles of European Private Law’ of the Universities of Barcelona, Berlin (Humboldt), Lyon
55
Funding
on ‘Uniform Terminology for European Private Law’ (2002-2006) under the fifth Research Framework Programme.4 We are extremely indebted to all who in this way have made our work possible.
III, Münster (co-ordinator of the Network: Professor Reiner Schulze), Nijmegen, Oxford and Turin, funded under the 4th EU Research Framework Programme 1997-2002.
4TMR (Training and Mobility) Network ‘Uniform Terminology for European Private Law’ of the Universities of Barcelona, Lyon III, Münster, Nijmegen, Oxford, Turin (co-ordinator of the Network: Professor Gianmaria Ajani), Warsaw, funded under the 5th EU Research Framework Programme 2002-2006.
56