D_V_Streltsov_Vneshnepoliticheskie_prioritety_Yaponii_v_Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom_Regione

Herranz H.L. Diaoyu or Senkaku? Strained Relations in the East China Sea. URL: http://www.eias.org/sites/default/files/EIAS_September_2012_ Island_dispute (accessed: 02.03.2014).

History of the Northern Territories. Hokkaido Government Official Site. URL: http://www.pref.hokkaido.lg.jp/sm/hrt/hp-en/hist-en.htm (accessed: 02.03.2014).

Horvat A. Overcoming the Negative Legacy of the Past: Why Europe is a Positive Example for East Asia // The Brown Journal of International Affairs. 2004. Vol. XI. Issue 1.

Hoshiyama Takashi. New Japan–China Relations and the Corresponding Positioning of the United States History, Values, Realism in a Changing World // Asia-Pacific Review. 2008. Vol. 15. No. 2.

Hughes Ch.W. Japan’s Remilitarization. Routledge, 2009.

Inoguchi Takashi, Bacon P. Japan’s Emerging Role as a ‘Global Ordinary Power’ // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2006. Vol. 6.

Japan as a ‘Normal Country’: A Nation in Search of its Place in the World / Ed. by Yoshihide Soeya, Masayuki Tadokoro, D.A.Welch. University of Toronto Press, 2012.

Japan’s Future in East Asia and the Pacific / Ed. by M. Pangetsu, Ligang Song). Canberra, 2007.

Japan’s International Relations. Politics, Economics and Security / Ed. by G. Hook. Routledge, 2007.

Japan’s Quest For Comprehensive Security. L., 1983.

Jong Kun Choi, Chung-in Moon. Understanding Northeast Asian Regional Dynamics: Inventory Checking and New Discourses on Power, Interest, and Identity // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2010. Vol. 10.

Kaihara Hiroshi. Contemporary Conservative Thoughts in Japan: Conservative Views on Morality, History, and Social Issues // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2009. Vol. 9.

Kersten R. Revisionism, Reaction and the ‘Symbol Emperor’ in Post-War Japan // Japan Forum. 2003. No. 15 (1).

Kimura Hiroshi. Japanese-Russian Relations under Gorbachev and Yeltsin. N.Y., 2000.

Kingston J. Awkward Talisman: War Memory, Reconciliation and Yasukuni // East Asia. 2007. No. 24.

Lawson S., Tanaka Seiko. War Memories and Japan's 'Normalization' as an International Actor: A Critical Analysis // European Journal of International Relations.2011. No. 17.

Medvedev to Pay Another Visit to Kuril Islands (2012). URL: http:// voiceofrussia.com/2012_07_03/80063072/ (accessed: 09.02. 2014).

Miyashita Akitoshi. Where Do Norms Come from? Foundations of Japan’s Postwar Pacifism // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007. Vol. 7.

270

Moore G.J. History, Nationalism and Face in Sino-Japanese Relations // Journal of Chinese Political Science. 2010. No. 15.

Mulgan A.G. Why Japan is Lagging on the TPP. URL: http://www. eastasiaforum.org/2012/05/30/why-japan-is-lagging-on-the-tpp/ (accessed: 30.07.2012).

Nagashima D. Japan’s Militarist Past: Reconciliation in East Asia? // Yale Journal of International Affairs. Fall Winter 2006.

Network Power: Japan and Asia / Ed. by P.J. Katzenstein, Takashi Shiraishi. Cornell University Press, 1997.

Nimmo W.F. Japan and Russia. A Reevaluation in the Post-Soviet Era. L., 1994. Nozaki Yoshiko, Selden M. Japanese Textbook Controversies, Nationalism, and Historical Memory: Intraand Inter-National Conflicts // Japan Focus. URL:

http://www.japanfocus.org/-Mark-Selden/3173 (accessed: 09.02.2014). ODA Loan Report 2005. Tokyo, 2006.

Omori Takashi. A New Era for APEC and TPP // AJISS-Commentary. No. 140. URL: http://www.jiia.or.jp/en_commentary/201201/13-1.html (accessed: 12.09.2013).

Onuma Yasuaki. Japanese War Guilt and Postwar Responsibilities of Japan // Berkeley Journal of International Law. 2002. No. 20.

Pan Junwu. Toward a New Framework for Peaceful Settlement of China’s Territorial and Boundary Disputes. Leiden, 2009.

Park Cheol Hee. The Pattern of Cooperation and Conflict between Korea and Japan: Theoretical Expectations and Empirical Realities // Japanese Journal of Political Science. December 2009. Vol. 10. Issue 03.

Pyle K.B. Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. N.Y., 2007.

Rozman G. Internationalism and Asianism in Japanese Strategic Thought from Meiji to Heisei [2008] // Japanese Journal of Political Science. 2008. No. 9.

Rozman G. Narrowing the Gap between China and Japan: Three Dimensions of National Identity and the Korean Factor // Japanese Journal of Political Science. March 2013. Vol. 14. Special Issue 1.

Russia and Japan. An Unresolved Dilemma Between Distant Neighbors / Ed. by Tsuyoshi Hasegawa etc. Berkeley, 1993.

Rynhold J. Japan’ Cautious New Activism in the Middle East: A Qualitative Change or More of the Same? // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2002. Vol. 2.

Samuels R. Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Cornell University Press, 2007.

Smith R.D. Security and International Fisheries Policy in Japan’s Postwar Planning // Social Science Japan Journal. 2008. Vol. 11. No. 2.

Solis M. Japan and East Asian Economic Regionalism // The Routledge Handbook of Japanese Politics. Routledge, 2011.

271

Suh J.J. War-Like History or Diplomatic History? Contentions over the Past and Regional Orders in Northeast Asia // Australian Journal of International Affairs. September 2007. Vol. 61. No. 3.

Takahashi Toshiya. Japan’s 2013 Defence White Paper Stirs Tensions with China. URL: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/07/31/japans-2013- defence-white-paper-stirs-tensions-with-china/ (accessed: 12.09.2013).

Tanaka Hitoshi. Japan’s Policy for East Asia // Asia Pacific Review. November 2007. Vol. 14, No. 2.

Terada Takashi. Northeast Asia’s Eternal Triangle is Really an American Affair of Sorts. URL: http:/www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/07/18/northeast- asia-s-eternal-triangle-is-really-an-american-affair-of-sorts/ (accessed: 30.07.2012).

The US–Japan Alliance: Past, Present and Future / Ed. by M.J. Green, P.M. Cronin. N.Y., 1999.

Wallace C. Why the TPP will Not Be Noda’s Next Big Challenge. URL: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/07/16/why-the-tpp-will-not-be-noda-s- next-big-challenge/ (accessed: 30.07.2012).

Wei Su S. The Territorial Dispute over the Tiyaoyu/Senkaku Islands: An Update // Ocean Development & International Law. 2005. No. 36.

Weston S.K. The Democratic Party of Japan: Its Foreign Policy Position and Implications for U.S. Interests. URL: http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/ R40758_20090812.pdf (accessed: 30.07.2012).

Wirth Ch. China, Japan, and East Asian Regional Cooperation: The Views of ‘Self’ and ‘Other’ from Beijing and Tokyo // International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2009. Vol. 9.

World and Japan (1956). ‘State Department Memorandum on the Japan-Soviet Negotiations, The Aide-Memoire. September 7, 1956’. URL: http:// www.ioc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~worldjpn/documents/texts/JPRU/19560907. O1E.html (accessed: 02.03.2014).

Периодические издания

На русском языке

Время новостей Знакомьтесь Япония Известия Коммерсант

Международная жизнь Независимая газета Правда Советская Россия

272

На японском языке

Акахата Асахи дзянару Асахи симбун

Иомиури симбун Майнити симбун Нихон кэйдзай симбун Санкэй симбун

На английском языке

Asahi Evening News

Bulletin of Atomic Scientists

The Daily Yomiuri

Guardian

Financial Times

Japan Echo

Japan Forum

Japan Quaterly

The Japan Times

The Japan Times Weekly

Mainichi Daily News

Nation

The New York Times

NHK World

Times

Times of India

Интернет-сайты

Сайты государственных органов, политических и общественных организаций

Сайт Ассоциации внешней торговли Японии: http://www.jetro.go.jp Сайт Демократической партии Японии: http://www.dpj.or.jp

Сайт Министерства иностранных дел России: http://www.mid.ru Сайт Министерства иностранных дел Японии: http://www.mofa.go.jp Сайт Министерства обороны Японии: http://www.mod.go.jp

Сайт Организации Объединенных Наций: http://www.un.org

Сайт правительства Японии, посвященный участию в миротворческих операциях ООН: http://pko.go.jp

Сайт префектуры Хоккайдо: http://www.pref.hokkaido.lg.jp

273

Сайт Федерации экономических организаций Японии: http://www. keidanren.or.jp

Сайт Центральной исследовательской компании, проводящей социологические опросы по заказу Канцелярии кабинета министров Японии: http://www8.cao.go.jp/survey/h25/h25-gaiko/2-1.html

Аналитические сайты, сайты «мозговых центров»

и исследовательских учреждений

http://dic.academic.ru

http://japandaily.ru/

http://www.brookings.edu

http://www.eastasiaforum.org

http://www.hist.msu.ru

https://www.iiss.org

http://www2.jiia.or.jp

Новостные сайты, сайты информационных агентств,

газет, телевидения и иных СМИ

http://Japantoday.ru

http://rbc.ru/

http://ria.ru/

http://rus.ruvr.ru

http://Sakhalin.info

http://www.cntv.ru

http://www.kp.ru/daily

http://www.newsru.com

http://www.polit.ru

http://www.pravda.ru

http://www.vremya.ru

274

SUMMARY

In the postwar period, Japan passed a long way from a country that lost a war and lay in ruins to a prosperous democratic state, one of the indisputable political and economic leaders of the region and the globe. In the military and political areas, Japan made the alliance with the United States the cornerstone of its foreign policy. In the period of the cold war, against the background of global bipolarity system, Japan positioned itself as a part of the Western world which was in opposition to the Communist bloc.

After growing into the second world economy in the late 1960s, Japan was for a long time unable to realize its potential as a global political leader. Since the end of the Second World War, Japan, finding herself in the shadow of the United States, her senior partner in the security treaty, consistently carried out the Yoshida doctrine.

In its security policy, Japan was in an ambiguous position. On the one hand, Japan positioned itself as a pacifist power which renounced war as a means of solving international disputes and which carried the moral obligations as the unique country that had suffered from the use of atomic weapons. On the other hand, after accepting the security guarantees from the United States, Japan de facto recognized the legitimacy of the use of American military power, including the nuclear weapons, for protecting it against external aggression.

The largest watershed in the history of Japanese foreign policy in the postwar period was the end of the bipolar period. Disintegration of the socialist system caused the identity crisis of the strategic alliance with America that previously formed the basis of the entire foreign policy of postwar Japan.

The development of economic and strategic situation after the end of the cold war has repeatedly confirmed for Japan the importance of its relations with the United States. The Japan-US military alliance acquired an additional value in Japan’s eyes in light of new challenges in the field of military security facing her in East Asia. Among them are the missile and nuclear development program of the DPRK involving a series of nuclear tests held since 2006, and the aggravation of territorial dispute with China, which after 2010 has entered the phase of an open armed conflict.

However, Japan started gradually deviating from the pacifist status and turning into a “normal state” void of any restrictions on a full-fledged military up-building. In its national security policy, Tokyo took a course of the intensification of military component. This course is justified by global developments

275

on the world scene, first of all by the economic weakening of the United States and their inability to cope alone with the task of securing the interests of the Western community all over the world. There are growing concerns in Japan related to China’s military rise and the development of Pyongyang’s nuclear program, as well as to the general instability in the international relations of East Asia.

Japan’s relations with her Asian neighbors remained extremely complicated and tense. Japan continued the geopolitical rivalry with China. The political climate of bilateral relations was negatively affected by the unsolved problem of Senkaku/Diaoyudao. A serious diplomatic problem for Japan was caused by her territorial conflicts with neighbors rooted in the legacy of the Second World War. These conflicts emerged as a result of the San Francisco Peace Treaty that had failed to provide Japan with legally impeccable system of state borders. The current state of these conflicts, which in most cases has a deep historical background, is addressed in this book.

A large part of Japan’s relations with China and South Korea is related to the outstanding historical issues of the Second World War, including the problem of formal apologies, the problem of history textbooks, the problem of “comfort women,” as well as the issue of Japan’s penance for the aggressive policy on the mainland, which in a broader sense retains its vitality on the international agenda. Many of these problems, unlikely to be sold in the immediate future, have in recent years caused a significant deterioration of the political climate in Japan’s relations with her neighbors and even a freeze of high level political dialogue.

A significant impact on Japan’s policy in the Asia-Pacific region is provided by domestic political considerations. They include the rise of nationalism, the growth of popularity of rightist ideology and its use by the political parties represented in the Parliament, as well as the appearance of new generations of Japanese that do not remember the atrocities of WWII. Of great significance is also the growth of populism in politics, forcing the state administration to make such decisions—including those in the sphere of foreign pol- icy—as do not necessarily correspond to the national interests and address primarily the nationalist feelings of the electorate.

A special research issue tackled in the book deals with the institutional foundations of Japanese diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region, namely the characteristic features of foreign policy decision-making process in postwar Japan and the place and the role of each policy-making institution in the formulation and implementation of Japan’s foreign policy priorities in the AsiaPacific region. The study of foreign policy decision-making process requires a good understanding of the eternal dialectics between its external and internal factors. For Japan, the enforcement of internal factors in the foreign policy decision-making process was also facilitated by the fact that the very notion of

276

national interests had been shaped in the context of domestic needs, especially the need for economic growth and integrated national security.

The book also pays special attention to Japan’s participation in the processes of economic integration in the Asia-Pacific region over the past two decades, which has become an imperative for Japan. Given that more than half of the country’s GDP is still ensured by export, the overall state of Japanese economy depends largely on the preferential arrangements in the sphere of foreign trade. The book explores the problem of Japan’s accession to the Transpacific Partnership and other multilateral economic integration mechanisms. A serious academic problem lies in Tokyo’s policy towards major international political formats of the Asia-Pacific region, and first of all the APEC. In addition, the book addresses the issue of the ODA, namely, how Japan uses the tools of development assistance to defend her own economic and political interests in the Asia-Pacific region.

A special place in the foreign policy priorities of postwar Japan in the AsiaPacific region was held by her relations with Russia. This is due to the fact that, after the end of the cold war, relations with Russia have acquired a particular importance for Japan’s national interests in the context of the relative weakening of her regional and global role, as well as due to the aggravation of the problem of energy resources, as Russia started to assume the role of key energy supplier to Japan.

277

Œ√À¿¬À≈Õ»≈

278

279