- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •1 Introduction
- •The land and its water
- •Climate and vegetation
- •Lower Palaeolithic (ca. 1,000,000–250,000 BC)
- •Middle Palaeolithic (ca. 250,000–45,000 BC)
- •Upper Palaeolithic and Epipalaeolithic (ca. 45,000–9600 BC)
- •Rock art and ritual
- •The Neolithic: A synergy of plants, animals, and people
- •New perspectives on the Neolithic from Turkey
- •Beginnings of sedentary life
- •Southeastern Anatolia
- •North of the Taurus Mountains
- •Ritual, art, and temples
- •Southeastern Anatolia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Contact and exchange: The obsidian trade
- •Stoneworking technologies and crafts
- •Concluding remarks
- •Pottery Neolithic (ca. 7000–6000 BC)
- •Houses and ritual
- •Southeastern Anatolia and Cilicia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Western Anatolia and the Aegean coast
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Seeing red
- •Invention of pottery
- •Cilicia and the southeast
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Other crafts and technology
- •Economy
- •Concluding remarks on the Ceramic Neolithic
- •Spread of farming into Europe
- •Early and Middle Chalcolithic (ca. 6000–4000 BC)
- •Regional variations
- •Eastern Anatolia
- •The central plateau
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Metallurgy
- •Late Chalcolithic (ca. 4000–3100 BC)
- •Euphrates area and southeastern Anatolia
- •Late Chalcolithic 1 and 2 (LC 1–2): 4300–3650 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 3 (LC 3): 3650–3450 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 4 (LC 4): 3450–3250 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 5 (LC 5): 3250–3000/2950 BC
- •Eastern Highlands
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwestern Anatolia and the Pontic Zone
- •Central Anatolia
- •Early Bronze Age (ca. 3100–2000 BC)
- •Cities, centers, and villages
- •Regional survey
- •Southeast Anatolia
- •East-central Anatolia (Turkish Upper Euphrates)
- •Eastern Anatolia
- •Western Anatolia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Cilicia
- •Metallurgy and its impact
- •Wool, milk, traction, and mobility: Secondary products revolution
- •Burial customs
- •The Karum Kanesh and the Assyrian trading network
- •Middle Bronze Age city-states of the Anatolian plateau
- •Central Anatolian material culture of the Middle Bronze Age
- •Indo-Europeans in Anatolia and the origins of the Hittites
- •Middle Bronze Age Anatolia beyond the horizons of literacy
- •The end of the trading colony period
- •The rediscovery of the Hittites
- •Historical outline
- •The imperial capital
- •Hittite sites in the empire’s heartland
- •Hittite architectural sculpture and rock reliefs
- •Hittite glyptic and minor arts
- •The concept of an Iron Age
- •Assyria and the history of the Neo-Hittite principalities
- •Key Neo-Hittite sites
- •Carchemish
- •Zincirli
- •Karatepe
- •Land of Tabal
- •Early Urartu, Nairi, and Biainili
- •Historical developments in imperial Biainili, the Kingdom of Van
- •Fortresses, settlements, and architectural practices
- •Smaller artefacts and decorative arts
- •Bronzes
- •Stone reliefs
- •Seals and seal impressions
- •Urartian religion and cultic activities
- •Demise
- •The Trojan War as prelude
- •The Aegean coast
- •The Phrygians
- •The Lydians
- •The Achaemenid conquest and its antecedents
- •Bibliography
- •Index
M E TA L S M I T H S A N D M I G R A N T S
the driver in the formation of the Kura-Araxes package. The red and black color scheme may well have been an Anatolian contribution, but attributes such as small handles set at the juncture of the neck and shoulders and tall (slightly swollen) necked jars are firmly embedded in the Trans-Caucasian Chalcolithic. Rothman aptly described the nature of these highland dynamics as “ripples in a stream of movement of pastoral nomads, traders and small farmers back and forth in the larger region.”60 Moreover, according to him, this movement was prompted by the search for specific natural resources, especially metal ores, population densities, and the adaptation to a range of environmental zones. Recent pollen data from Georgia, pointing to an increase in rainfall and temperature (a “climatic optimum”) beginning after 4000 BC, also suggest that environmental change may have been a factor in economic strategies and expansion.61
Western Anatolia
Compared with the eastern regions, the fourth millennium in western Anatolia, which here includes the central plateau and northern coastal regions, remains rather obscure with the southwest providing the most reasonable picture. Beycesultan, in the upper reaches of the Menderes (Maeander) Valley, offers a deep sequence of immense value for tracing the continuity of occupation. The earliest arrivals at the site established their village on virgin soil in Late Chalcolithic. Once thought to precede immediately the local Early Bronze Age, it now seems better to place this first settlement earlier at 3800–3400 BC, with Kuruçay (Levels 6A–4) following, as the lead up to the third millennium.62 Late Chalcolithic pottery from Beycesultan (Levels XL–XX) can be grouped into four phases dominated by a dark ware with a burnished surface that is sometimes decorated with a matt white paint. Shapes are simple and serviceable, consisting of flat dishes with outcurving sides, open bowls with thick everted rims, and large and small jugs with one handle linking rim to shoulder. Architecture is poorly understood for these lowest levels, but mud brick buildings with a main rectangular room and attached anteroom are clearly discernable.
Meanwhile at Kuruçay alleyways and paths separated freestanding, single structures (Figure 5.11: 1).63 Despite these spaces between the buildings—cross walls blocked circulation at certain points—there does not appear to have been a predetermined plan for the settlement. One building (XXII) was considered a sacred space because of the concentration of ceramics of uncommon forms. Otherwise buildings appear to have been domestic—large enough to accommodate three to five members of a family and sometimes equipped with an oven in the corner. In Level 4 multiroomed units—one main room with storage rooms attached—suggest some social or economic differentiation. At Bag˘ bas¸ı, in the Elmalı Plain, the Late Chalcolithic is poorly preserved, but enough survives there and at other sites in the region to indicate the spread of this southwest tradition to northern Lycia.64
168
M E TA L S M I T H S A N D M I G R A N T S
Northwestern Anatolia and the Pontic Zone
The evidence for the northwest and Pontic regions is patchy. Pattern-burnished ware characterizes Kumtepe B, in the Troad, and has been found at other sites on the Gelibolu Peninsula and around the Sea of Marmara.65 Late Chalcolithic marble figurines of the so-called Kilia type with a flat, “cut-out” body and ovoid head were found at Tigani IV, Pekmez and several sites in the northwest and the Aegean.66 Black burnished wares with white painted ornaments occur at Yazır Höyük, Orman Fidanlıg˘ ı VII, and the Konya Plain.67 Bowls at Orman Fidanlıg˘ ı were also decorated with oblique bands of lines pendant from the rim, which can be notched and rippled.68
Forms include bowls with sharply everted rims and rounded pots with spurred handles. The Late Chalcolithic burials at Ilıpınar, which are not associated with a known settlement, have nonetheless offered evidence on mortuary rites (Figure 5.12).69 Unlike the Neolithic burials, these fourth millennium graves sometimes had two individuals, mostly adults, who were placed in a contracted position together with pottery and metal objects.
˙
Ikiztepe, the key site in the Black Sea region, incorporates four small mounds, two of which have been investigated extensively. Even so, its stratigraphy is difficult to interpret, with nomenclature complicating matters further; much material attributed originally to the Early Bronze Age has been reassigned to the Late Chalcolithic.70 Discoloration of soil and rows of post holes point to the use of timber and wattle and daub in the construction of freestanding houses, conforming to a rough square or rectangular plan usually with an anteroom. Fixed clay hearths were set into the floors. Potters produced a restricted range of simple shapes that are also attested at Dündartepe—hole-mouth jars sometimes with triangular ledge handles and deep bowls with inverted rim, often producing a sharp profile, are the most common.
Central Anatolia
Of all the Anatolian regions in the Late Chalcolithic period, developments in central Anatolia, in particular the north central region, are the most difficult to comprehend, a situation that no doubt owes much to its geographical circumstance—a cusp region open to influences from neighbors. The Alis¸ar Regional Project, incorporating renewed investigations at Alis¸ar Höyük and new excavations at nearby Çadır Höyük, has done much in recent years to clarify the situation.71 It appears that after the relative obscurity of the Middle Chalcolithic, clusters of sites emerged centred around larger settlements such as Alis¸ar and Çadır.
Alis¸ar Höyük, in the bend of the Kızılırmak, is a key site with a 12 m deep deposit, but has a rather confusing stratigraphy and nomenclature. For a long time it was thought that the many levels before the Early Bronze Age II should be compressed into 500 years with a baseline about 3000 BC. It is more reasonable, however, to extend the beginning of the sequence well into the middle of the fourth millennium.72 The American excavators labelled eight Chalcolithic levels in Early (Levels 19–15) and Late Chalcolithic (Levels 14–12). A distinctive type found both at
170
