
- •Preface
- •Acknowledgments
- •1 Introduction
- •The land and its water
- •Climate and vegetation
- •Lower Palaeolithic (ca. 1,000,000–250,000 BC)
- •Middle Palaeolithic (ca. 250,000–45,000 BC)
- •Upper Palaeolithic and Epipalaeolithic (ca. 45,000–9600 BC)
- •Rock art and ritual
- •The Neolithic: A synergy of plants, animals, and people
- •New perspectives on the Neolithic from Turkey
- •Beginnings of sedentary life
- •Southeastern Anatolia
- •North of the Taurus Mountains
- •Ritual, art, and temples
- •Southeastern Anatolia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Contact and exchange: The obsidian trade
- •Stoneworking technologies and crafts
- •Concluding remarks
- •Pottery Neolithic (ca. 7000–6000 BC)
- •Houses and ritual
- •Southeastern Anatolia and Cilicia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Western Anatolia and the Aegean coast
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Seeing red
- •Invention of pottery
- •Cilicia and the southeast
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Other crafts and technology
- •Economy
- •Concluding remarks on the Ceramic Neolithic
- •Spread of farming into Europe
- •Early and Middle Chalcolithic (ca. 6000–4000 BC)
- •Regional variations
- •Eastern Anatolia
- •The central plateau
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwest Anatolia
- •Metallurgy
- •Late Chalcolithic (ca. 4000–3100 BC)
- •Euphrates area and southeastern Anatolia
- •Late Chalcolithic 1 and 2 (LC 1–2): 4300–3650 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 3 (LC 3): 3650–3450 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 4 (LC 4): 3450–3250 BC
- •Late Chalcolithic 5 (LC 5): 3250–3000/2950 BC
- •Eastern Highlands
- •Western Anatolia
- •Northwestern Anatolia and the Pontic Zone
- •Central Anatolia
- •Early Bronze Age (ca. 3100–2000 BC)
- •Cities, centers, and villages
- •Regional survey
- •Southeast Anatolia
- •East-central Anatolia (Turkish Upper Euphrates)
- •Eastern Anatolia
- •Western Anatolia
- •Central Anatolia
- •Cilicia
- •Metallurgy and its impact
- •Wool, milk, traction, and mobility: Secondary products revolution
- •Burial customs
- •The Karum Kanesh and the Assyrian trading network
- •Middle Bronze Age city-states of the Anatolian plateau
- •Central Anatolian material culture of the Middle Bronze Age
- •Indo-Europeans in Anatolia and the origins of the Hittites
- •Middle Bronze Age Anatolia beyond the horizons of literacy
- •The end of the trading colony period
- •The rediscovery of the Hittites
- •Historical outline
- •The imperial capital
- •Hittite sites in the empire’s heartland
- •Hittite architectural sculpture and rock reliefs
- •Hittite glyptic and minor arts
- •The concept of an Iron Age
- •Assyria and the history of the Neo-Hittite principalities
- •Key Neo-Hittite sites
- •Carchemish
- •Zincirli
- •Karatepe
- •Land of Tabal
- •Early Urartu, Nairi, and Biainili
- •Historical developments in imperial Biainili, the Kingdom of Van
- •Fortresses, settlements, and architectural practices
- •Smaller artefacts and decorative arts
- •Bronzes
- •Stone reliefs
- •Seals and seal impressions
- •Urartian religion and cultic activities
- •Demise
- •The Trojan War as prelude
- •The Aegean coast
- •The Phrygians
- •The Lydians
- •The Achaemenid conquest and its antecedents
- •Bibliography
- •Index

A N AT O L I A T R A N S F O R M E D
Figure 4.15 Plan of As¸ag˘ ı Pınar Level VI (adapted from Özdog˘ an 2007)
Seeing red
Even though meanings escape us, we have seen that through the use of imagery and material culture Neolithic societies constructed and used complex symbolic systems. This unique ability to link a concept with a symbol, whether material or abstract such as language, is, par excellence, the hallmark of Homo sapiens. One of the most potent carriers of symbolic meaning is color. Yet despite the extensive ethnographic evidence for color symbolism among contemporary societies, this topic has received relatively little exposure in archaeology, and even less in
107
A N AT O L I A T R A N S F O R M E D
Anatolia.63 Following Victor Turner’s commentary of the ritual ceremonies of the Ndembu of Zambia, many researchers support the idea that white, black, and red form a basic color triad, which carried similar meanings across many societies.64 This view is strengthened by linguistic and perception studies, which have revealed a series of complex biological, social, neurophysiological, and psychological factors involved in both the naming of color and its perception.65 It is now generally maintained that in most languages, color terminology is based on a seven-stage evolutionary sequence.66 The basic color terms are “white” and “black,” the monochromatic colors, which are followed by red. This process of naming is, in turn, connected with the complex physics and physiology of human vision, which is trichromatic like that of certain primates.67 Of all colors, red is the most salient primary color the visual system can perceive, subjectively advancing closer to the observer than any other equidistantly placed color.
Given the prominence of red in the Neolithic, it is the social context of redness that is so intriguing. Here we will restrict ourselves to the cultural significance of the color red, and ochre, its most common material referent, and briefly survey the available evidence for prehistoric Anatolia. Ochre is an earthy iron ore whose color is determined by the quantity of iron oxide. The higher the amount, the redder the ochre, like haematite; by heating yellow ochre (limonite, goethite), its color can be changed to red. Impurities such as cinnabar and clay can also affect the color and texture of ochre. These elements need to be considered because, judging by recorded instances of ochre procurement in the recent past, expeditions sometimes travelled through hostile territories and endured many privations to mine “proper” ochre, even though other sources were readily available.68 The archaeological record is replete with examples of ochre usage. They are found across five continents and extend back to the Middle Palaeolithic, with the evidence from Qafzeh Cave, in Israel, being the most thoroughly examined.69 To judge by ochre’s multifarious uses in contemporary cultures such as body adornment, ritual cleansing, and medicinal purposes, we only have a portion of the prehistoric picture. Even so, what has survived provides ample testimony on two primary uses of ochre. It was (and still is) the dominant pigment used to decorate caves and rock shelters, and, since the time of Neanderthals, who signalled a new awareness of self-existence by burying their dead, there is persistent and extensive evidence for red ochre’s symbolic role in mortuary practice. This took the form of sprinkling ochre, occasionally profusely, over the deceased, or placing pieces of ochre around the body.70 Ochre was used well before rock art and burials. At the lower Palaeolithic site of Terra Amata, in France, 60 pieces of ochre, some with abraded edges (“crayons”), were scattered among the debris of a camp, and probably used to color objects, skins, or the inhabitants themselves.
The desire of humans to decorate their bodies in any number of ways, from body art through hairstyles to clothes, enables messages to be transmitted that are understood by members within that society. Ethnography enlightens us on the magical properties of red, and its role and primacy in body art.71 When people decorate their bodies they do so for one or more purposes— social, ritual, physical/sexual, practical, and pleasure.72 In ritual contexts such as rites of passage and ceremonies, red is often accorded profound significance. It is, above all, symbolic of blood and signifies life, but its association with hunting and war also means it can stand for aggression
108