- •What is research? Name different kinds of research. Explain your answer.
- •2. Explain structure of science system in Kazakhstan since the period of its independence (1991) as it changed and transformed.
- •3. Specify distinctions in system of science funding in Kazakhstan before and after 2011 year
- •4) Explain the basic and main requirements to publication in scientific magazines.
- •5. Explain the meaning of an impact-factor, give an example of its calculation.
- •6.Explain the meaning of Hirsh index, give an example.
- •7 Explain classification of patents. Estimate and explain patenting conditions. Give an example.
- •8) The concept of "patent", the receipt of a patent for an invention, utility model, industrial design, the terms of patenting
- •9. Explain how to work with references, using End Note Web?
- •10. Explain what kind of rights for the invention will give patent to you from position of the law on patenting in rk
- •11. Explain by what criteria it is possible to estimate the magazine, using Journal Citation Report?
- •12) Explain the meaning of ethical standards of scientific research, give examples.
- •13. Explain which kind of activity National scientific council provides in rk?
- •14. Explain how to carry out searching of any field of scientific research, using Thomson Reuters. What type of the information can be received?.
- •15 What is iaea (International Atomic Energy Agency)?
- •16. Explain an education system in Kazakhstan, provide the historical review of its development. Compare features of the western and Kazakhstan education.
- •17. Give an assessment to activity of the international funds for science funding.
- •20)Give an assessment to grant system of science funding in Great Britain.
- •21. Compare activity of the international funds Soros and crdf what is the difference between them?
- •22.How to prepare paper for publication in journal with if?
- •23 Give an assessment to work of the international organization intas.
- •24. Explain distinction between the manuscript and the review article. Show the basic structure of research article.
- •25. Give an assessment to work of the International scientific and technological center in rk.
- •26. Give critical evaluation to the Law of rk science.
- •27. Explain distinction in activity of the organizations at mes rk leading scientific activity in Kazakhstan.
- •28)Compare systems of scientists' accreditation in Kazakhstan (before and after 2010) and abroad.
- •29. How it is possible to carry out information search including Hirsh's index by using Thomson Reuters?
- •30. Explain distinctions in process of publication of article in the magazine with an impact-factor and the republican magazine.
- •31 Estimate a concept of scientific research from the point of view of Thomson Reuters.
- •33. Estimate an index of the scientist's publication citing from Scopus position.
- •34. Explain what is Bologna Process. Critically estimate its influence on an education system in rk.
- •35. Give an assessment from the point of view of advantages and shortcomings of reforming of an education system of Kazakhstan during independence.
- •36. Estimate the author's responsibility for the publication and his right.
- •37. Give an assessment to the European framework programme (fp) of researches and technologies development.
- •38.Estimate research activity of the scientist using Scopus.What information can be obtained, give an example.
- •39 Estimate research activity of the scientist, using Web of Science. What information can be obtained, give an example.
- •40. Estimate the system of scientific research financing in rk, being guided by the new Law about rk science.
- •42 Develop searching for the patent investigation.
- •44. Formulate the cover letter for a grant. What are the features of it?
- •45) Create the application for a grant of the international fund. What are the features of it?
24. Explain distinction between the manuscript and the review article. Show the basic structure of research article.
The review article is one of the most common genres of social journalism.
A review article is a material that represents a spectrum of opinions or stories on the same topic. The review article can be written, for example, about the popularity of bowling, about the adoption of a new criminal-precessive code, about the fight against drug addiction, or about something else (almost everything). The author of the review article should talk with several experts in the area of interest. These experts should not always be scientists and officials (that is, people who professionally deal with the problem of interest to the journalist), but also those who are affected by the topic of the review article. From the point of view of a journalist, an expert on the criminal procedure code is not only a lawyer, but also a person who is imprisoned because of imperfect legislation. The main task of the author of the review article is to present really different views, and not of the notorious marginals, but of people who represent the point of view of a certain part of society.
The purpose of the article is tactful, but at the same time it is capacious and intelligible to convey all the necessary information. Comparative analysis is also useful here, and statistical data is all that will give "food" for reflection and decision-making.
Recognition of the review article, information should be submitted in a structured, laconic syllable. Successful will be the creation of numbered or bulleted lists.
It is important to provide the reader with examples and illustrations, in the role of which images and photographs, comparative tables, graphs or diagrams can appear. With their help, your article will be easy to comprehend.
Then most often the main characteristics of the product or service. We also take into account that purely technical information is always useful, but it is not worth it to get involved. Imagine mentally your audience, try to explain to her the essence of the matter in plain language.
We pay attention to the advantages of the offered goods (services) and shortcomings. But at the same time we give estimates: according to reviews, characteristics.
Naturally, the most competent and complete information will be collected if you really tested the subject of your review. Of course, in this case we are talking about a rather subjective opinion, but it is important to be tactful and authoritarian in expressing this opinion.
The reader should not get the impression that you are forcing him to something or discouraging. Any potential user of the service or product can be based on your decision to add up your opinion and make a decision.
Despite the fact that reviews are written for people, your article should be relevant to users' queries in search engines: so it will be easier for readers to find information. Do not forget to specify and where you can buy the goods or order the service, without specificity, in common words.
A scientific article is a complete author's work describing the results of an original scientific research (primary scientific article) or devoted to reviewing previously published scientific articles linked by a common theme (a review scientific article). In primary scientific articles, the authors state significant information about the research conducted in a form that allows other members of the scientific community to evaluate the research, reproduce the experiments, and also to evaluate the reasoning and conclusions drawn from them. Review scientific articles are designed to generalize, analyze, evaluate, summarize or synthesize previously published information (primary scientific publications). Quite often, a scientific article combines these two types of scientific texts, including the overview and original parts.
