- •The Syntactic Field of a Sentence.
- •Act of Locution: He said to me “Entertain her!” Act of Illocution: He urged (or advised, ordered, etc) me to entertain her. Act of Perlocution: He persuaded me to entertain her.
- •In which illocutionary acts differ one from another.
- •C ↑ I (s does a)
- •1. Student X: Let's go to the movies tonight.
- •2. Student y: I have to study for an exam.
- •6. I have to tie my shoes.
- •7. I have to study for an exam, but let's go to the movies anyhow or;
- •8. I have to study for an exam, but I'll do it when we get home from the movies.
- •1) I apologize for stepping on your toe.
- •I congratulate you on winning the race.
- •In general the form of these is __________________________________.
- •Task 4. Study Reference Notes 1 and 2 and discuss the Maxims by Paul Grice and the Politeness Maxims by Geoffrey Leech. What is in common and what are the differences?
- •Reference Notes 1
- •2Paul Grice. Maxims
- •The Tact maxim
- •The Generosity maxim
- •The Approbation maxim
- •The Agreement maxim
- •The Sympathy maxim
- •Illocutionary Verbs vs Illocutionary Acts
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •3Could you be a little more quiet?
- •4You could be a little more quiet
- •4.1.1.1.1.1Are you able to reach the book on the top shelf?
- •5You ought to be more polite to your mother
- •6You should leave immediately
- •7Would you mind awfully if I asked you if you could write me a letter of recommendation?
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •III. Sentences concerning the propositional content
- •8Give definitions of locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts of speech.
- •Means of substitution and their analysis.
- •“In that instant Hartley was gone, rushing out of the kitchen, not towards the front door, but out of the back door, straight onto the grass and onto the rocks”.
- •Example 1
- •Example 2
- •Example 3
- •Structural features of extrinsic modality
- •Structural features of intrinsic modality
- •In which of these types of discourse modal verbs are used mostly in their epistemic / deontic meaning?
- •Criteria Used to Qualify a Written Text as a Discourse.
- •3. Historical Backgrounds of Discourse Analysis
- •4. Dimensions of Discourse and Fields of Discourse Studies
- •Stylistics
- •Rhétoric
- •Discourse Pragmatics
- •5. Conversation Analysis
- •6. Discourse Grammar
- •7. The Future of Discourse Studies
- •2. Analysis of Written Discourse
- •Approaches to Cohesion and Rhetorical Structure Analysis
- •4. Forms of Cohesion
- •5. Approaches to Register and Genre Analysis
- •Speech and Discourse Communities
- •7. New Literacy Studies
- •I. Information Packaging
- •1.2. Cohesive texts: topic comes before comment
- •1.3. Front-focus: initial position for extra focus
- •Discourse Strategies
- •Passives – creating new subjects
- •Different semantic types as subjects
- •Existentials
- •III. Focus Strategies
- •3.1. Cleft constructions
- •3.2.Fronting
- •3.3.Left-dislocation
- •3.4. Right-dislocation
- •Methods of Studying Discourse Processing
- •Theoretical Approaches to Discourse Processing
- •1.2.1. Construction-Integration Model
- •1.2.2. Structure-Building Framework
- •1.2.3. Event-Indexing Model
- •1.2.4. Memory-Based Approach
- •1.3. Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Discourse Processing
- •1.3.1. Integrating Sentences into a Coherent Discourse
- •1.3.2. Generating Inferences during Discourse Processing
- •1.3.3. Determining Reference in Discourse Processing
- •II. Elements Supporting Discourse: Discourse Markers
- •2.1. The Conversational Approach
- •2.2. The Grammatico-Syntactic Approach
- •2.3. The Discourse-Cognitive Approach
Reference Notes 1
2Paul Grice. Maxims
These maxims may be better understood as describing the assumptions listeners normally make about the way speakers will talk, rather than prescriptions for how one ought to talk.
They are not sociological generalizations about speech, nor they are moral prescriptions on what to say or communicate. They are better presumptions about utterances, presumptions that we as listeners rely on and as speakers exploit. Gricean Maxims generate implicatures.
Maxim of Quality: Truth
Do not say what you believe to be false.
Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.
Maxim of Quantity: Information
Make your contribution as informative as is required for the current purposes of the exchange.
Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
Maxim of Relation: Relevance
Be relevant.
Maxim of Manner: Clarity
Avoid obscurity of expression. ("Eschew obfuscation")
Avoid ambiguity.
Be brief ("avoid unnecessary prolixity").
Be orderly.
Maxim of Quality
Be Truthful
Do not say what you believe to be false.
Do not say that for which you lack adequate evidence.
Example:
A: Should I buy my son this new sports car?
B: I don't know if that's such a good idea. He's totaled two cars since he got his license last year.
vs.
B: No, he seems like he'd be a bad driver.
Maxim of Quantity
Quantity of Information
Make your contribution as informative as is required (for the current purposes of the exchange).
Do not make your contribution more informative than is required.
Example:
A: Where is the post office?
B: Down the road, about 50 metres past the second left.
vs.
B: Not far.
Maxim of Relation
Relevance
Be relevant.
Example 1:
A: How are you doing in school?
B: Not too well, actually. I'm failing two of my classes.
vs.
B: What fine weather we're having lately!
Example 2:
A:(Waving at B, who is driving a taxi) Taxi!
B:(Waving at A, who is walking along the side of the road) Pedestrian!
Maxim of Manner
Be Clear
Avoid obscurity of expression.
Avoid ambiguity.
Be brief (avoid unnecessary prolixity).
Be orderly.
Example:
A: What did you think of that movie?
B: I liked the creative storyline. The ending was really a surprise!
vs.
B: It was interestingly done, sir.
Reference Notes 2
Politeness Maxims by Leech
According to Geoffrey Leech, there is a politeness principle with conversational maxims similar to those formulated by Paul Grice. He lists six maxims: tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy. The first and second form a pair, as do the third and the fourth. These maxims vary from culture to culture: what may be considered polite in one culture may be strange or downright rude in another. They are:
1. The Tact maxim
2. The Generosity maxim
3. The Approbation maxim
4. The Modesty maxim
5. The Agreement maxim
6. The Sympathy maxim
The Tact maxim
The tact maxim states: 'Minimize the expression of beliefs which imply cost to other; maximize the expression of beliefs which imply benefit to other.' The first part of this maxim fits in with Brown and Levinson's negative politeness strategy of minimising the imposition, and the second part reflects the positive politeness strategy of attending to the hearer's interests, wants, and needs: Could I interrupt you for a second? If I could just clarify this then.
