- •The Syntactic Field of a Sentence.
- •Act of Locution: He said to me “Entertain her!” Act of Illocution: He urged (or advised, ordered, etc) me to entertain her. Act of Perlocution: He persuaded me to entertain her.
- •In which illocutionary acts differ one from another.
- •C ↑ I (s does a)
- •1. Student X: Let's go to the movies tonight.
- •2. Student y: I have to study for an exam.
- •6. I have to tie my shoes.
- •7. I have to study for an exam, but let's go to the movies anyhow or;
- •8. I have to study for an exam, but I'll do it when we get home from the movies.
- •1) I apologize for stepping on your toe.
- •I congratulate you on winning the race.
- •In general the form of these is __________________________________.
- •Task 4. Study Reference Notes 1 and 2 and discuss the Maxims by Paul Grice and the Politeness Maxims by Geoffrey Leech. What is in common and what are the differences?
- •Reference Notes 1
- •2Paul Grice. Maxims
- •The Tact maxim
- •The Generosity maxim
- •The Approbation maxim
- •The Agreement maxim
- •The Sympathy maxim
- •Illocutionary Verbs vs Illocutionary Acts
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •3Could you be a little more quiet?
- •4You could be a little more quiet
- •4.1.1.1.1.1Are you able to reach the book on the top shelf?
- •5You ought to be more polite to your mother
- •6You should leave immediately
- •7Would you mind awfully if I asked you if you could write me a letter of recommendation?
- •Some sentences "conventionally" used in the
- •III. Sentences concerning the propositional content
- •8Give definitions of locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts of speech.
- •Means of substitution and their analysis.
- •“In that instant Hartley was gone, rushing out of the kitchen, not towards the front door, but out of the back door, straight onto the grass and onto the rocks”.
- •Example 1
- •Example 2
- •Example 3
- •Structural features of extrinsic modality
- •Structural features of intrinsic modality
- •In which of these types of discourse modal verbs are used mostly in their epistemic / deontic meaning?
- •Criteria Used to Qualify a Written Text as a Discourse.
- •3. Historical Backgrounds of Discourse Analysis
- •4. Dimensions of Discourse and Fields of Discourse Studies
- •Stylistics
- •Rhétoric
- •Discourse Pragmatics
- •5. Conversation Analysis
- •6. Discourse Grammar
- •7. The Future of Discourse Studies
- •2. Analysis of Written Discourse
- •Approaches to Cohesion and Rhetorical Structure Analysis
- •4. Forms of Cohesion
- •5. Approaches to Register and Genre Analysis
- •Speech and Discourse Communities
- •7. New Literacy Studies
- •I. Information Packaging
- •1.2. Cohesive texts: topic comes before comment
- •1.3. Front-focus: initial position for extra focus
- •Discourse Strategies
- •Passives – creating new subjects
- •Different semantic types as subjects
- •Existentials
- •III. Focus Strategies
- •3.1. Cleft constructions
- •3.2.Fronting
- •3.3.Left-dislocation
- •3.4. Right-dislocation
- •Methods of Studying Discourse Processing
- •Theoretical Approaches to Discourse Processing
- •1.2.1. Construction-Integration Model
- •1.2.2. Structure-Building Framework
- •1.2.3. Event-Indexing Model
- •1.2.4. Memory-Based Approach
- •1.3. Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Discourse Processing
- •1.3.1. Integrating Sentences into a Coherent Discourse
- •1.3.2. Generating Inferences during Discourse Processing
- •1.3.3. Determining Reference in Discourse Processing
- •II. Elements Supporting Discourse: Discourse Markers
- •2.1. The Conversational Approach
- •2.2. The Grammatico-Syntactic Approach
- •2.3. The Discourse-Cognitive Approach
Act of Locution: He said to me “Entertain her!” Act of Illocution: He urged (or advised, ordered, etc) me to entertain her. Act of Perlocution: He persuaded me to entertain her.
Task 2. Consider the Classification of Illocutionary Acts.
Representative: I have ten fingers on both hands.
Directive: Shut the window!
Question: Who has won the presidential election?
Commissive: I’ll meet you at the entrance at 2 p.m.
Expressive: I’m sorry for calling you a fool.
Declaration: You are out uttered by an umpire/ judge at a baseball game.
Task 3. Consider the following examples and fill in the table:
Utterance |
Syntactic Form |
Illocutionary Force |
It’s raining. |
|
|
Keep quiet. |
|
|
Significant dimensions
In which illocutionary acts differ one from another.
1. Differences in the point (or purpose) of the (type of) act.
2. Differences in the direction of fit between words and the world.
3. Differences in expressed psychological states.
4. Differences in the force or strength with which the illocutionary point is presented.
5. Differences in the status or position of the speaker and hearer as these bear on the illocutionary force of the utterance.
6. Differences in the way the utterance relates to the interests of the speaker and the hearer.
7. Differences in relations to the rest of the discourse.
8. Differences in propositional content that are determined by illocutionary force indicating devices.
9. Differences between those acts that must always be speech acts, and those that can be, but need not be performed as speech acts.
10. Differences between those acts that require extra-linguistic institutions for their performance and those that do not.
11. Differences between those acts where the corresponding illocutionary verb has a performative use and those where it does not.
I2. Differences in the style of performance of the illocutionary act.
SEMINAR 2.
Speech Acts. Illocutionary Acts: Classification by Searle
Task 1. Study the basic types of illocutionary acts, paying attention to the notions of illocutionary act, illocutionary point, the direction of fit, propositional content and illocutionary force.
Theory Generalization. Classification of Speech Acts by Searle
-
We represent the word-to-world direction of fit with ↓, a downward arrow,
the world-to-word direction of fit with ↑, an upward arrow.
In formulae, B stands for believe, W for want, I for intend, etc.
Searle presents a list of what he regards as the basic categories of illocutionary acts.
Assertives / Representatives. The illocutionary point or purpose of the members of the assertive class is to commit the speaker (in varying degrees) to something's being the case, to the truth of the expressed proposition. All of the members of the assertive class are assessable as true and false. Using Frege's assertion sign (r) to mark the illocutionary point common to all the members of this class, and the symbols introduced above, we may symbolize this class as follows:
The direction of fit is word-to-world; the psychological state expressed is Belief (that p).
Directives. The illocutionary point of these is that they are attempts (of varying degrees) by the speaker to get the hearer to do something. They may be very modest "attempts" as when I invite you to do it or suggest that you do it, or they may be very fierce attempts as when I insist that you do it. The direction of fit is world-to-words and the sincerity condition is want (or wish or desire). The propositional content is always that the hearer H does some future action A.
Verbs denoting members of this class are ask, order, command, request, beg, plead, pray, entreat, and also invite, permit, and advise. Searle thinks also that dare, defy and challenge are in this class (though Austin doesn’t list them here).
Questions are a subclass of directives, since they are attempts by S to get H to answer, i.e. to perform a speech act.
Commissives. Commissives then are those illocutionary acts whose point is to commit the speaker (again in varying degrees) to some future course of action. Using "c" for the members of this class generally, we have the following symbolism:
