Intercultural Communication in the Global Workplace
Intercultural communication in the global workplace offers many challenges. Hidden cultural differences often cause a great deal of misunderstanding and controversy. These differences are a serious problem because they are mostly invisible and inaudible but they affect the true meaning of the messages sent and received.
Being aware of the cultural factors that create "interference" will help you get your message across in the way it was intended and build a clear personal "international" brand as a professional business person that can relate to colleagues around the world.
Communication is strongly affected by culture. You can improve your cross cultural international communication by recognizing cultural differences and then overcoming your own ethnocentrism-the tendency to judge all other groups according to your own group's standards, behaviors, and customs.
The difference in cross-cultural communication is not about pronunciation or even language. The difference is in the mentality of people. Different nations have different filters, different perspectives and different shades. This is how the process of cross-cultural communication works.
When you write to or speak with someone from another culture, you encode your message using the assumptions of your own culture.
The recipient decodes your message according to the assumptions of their culture.
Meaning may be misunderstood.
The greater the difference between cultures, the greater the chance for misunderstanding.
Intercultural communication in the global workplace can be improved by recognizing and accommodating four main types of cultural differences: contextual; ethical; social; nonverbal.
People assign meaning to a message according to cultural context: physical cues, environmental stimuli, and implicit understanding that convey meaning between two members of the same culture.
Text 7
1.Read the text. Using the information from the text comment on the situation within the company and the decisions made.
2.Do you know any other examples of well-known companies which had to solve the same problems when merging?
Managing Cultural Differences
Nokia Siemens Networks’ birth involved more than merging product lines and operations. Soft issues rather than hard ones can kill a merger in its infancy, and considering the might and history of NSN’s parents, unifying two distinct corporate cultures into one would prove to be one of the venture’s biggest challenges.
Some years ago, 250 executives from Nokia Networks and Siemens Communications got together hashing out the details of their impending merger. Nokia and Siemens already had a good idea of what the company would look like on paper: they would create a huge global company with strengths in both wireless and wireline telecommunications, leverage a massive international sales force and achieve economies of scale unavailable to either company so long as they remained network divisions of their parent companies. But NSN also would be the merger of two distinct corporate cultures. The question was, how would the new NSN function?
There were several fundamentals that the two companies had in common: they both were Western European; they both had an ingrained engineering culture; and their employees also had a deep pride in being on technology’s cutting edge and a feeling of making a difference in the world. But those cram sessions also revealed some profound differences. Most striking of those differences was a sense of formality and structure in Siemens’ culture, as opposed to a looser set of relationships and emphasis on flexibility at Nokia.
The NSN case illustrates how senior managers begin to promote the adoption of a new corporate culture. Managing the differences that arise can present considerable challenges for a manager. Managers from these two organisations coming together from different cultures may perceive requirements for meeting their commitment to customer service, for example, in different ways. These influences can and do lead to differences in preferred methods of pursuing goals. National cultural influences may colour perceptions of what is important as well.
This case also illustrates the distinction between organisational and corporate culture and shows how proponents of a strong culture argue for promoting a homogeneous and consistent corporate culture rather than a homogeneous and consistent organisational culture (which they accept is unrealistic and unnecessary).
Many organisations try to promote strongly shared guiding values such as customer service. Multinationals seek to embed such values to ensure that managers and workforce, irrespective of their diverse cultural backgrounds, pull in the same direction as they strive to achieve the same broad corporate aims and goals. The task of NSN would be to arrive at new shared values and describe how these values are going to operate in the company. It is stated that NSN has two very distinct differences, which imply a ‘culture clash’ and a challenge about whose culture will be adopted – which also has the potential to alienate the other group.
Task III . Info from Larissa
Task IV. Work with a partner or in groups. Prepare some information for someone from a different culture who is coming to work in your country (company). Think about the things below and explain how aspects of your culture influence expected behavior. Present your recommendations to the rest of the class.
- how people behave in offices (meetings, streets, cafes…)
- relationships between different members of staff
- individual efforts and teamwork
- responsibility
- company policy
- social events etc.
Task V. Study the following diagram and consider the most important strategies for effective cross-cultural communication. Explain your choice.
Text 8
Read the text and say whether the statements below are true or false..