- •Introduction
- •Lecture 12: Problems of Translating Idioms
- •12.1. Idiom as a Stylistic Device
- •12.2. Grammatical Peculiarities of Idioms
- •12.3. Syntactical Peculiarities of Idioms
- •12.4. Classes of Idioms
- •Lecture 13: Phrasal Verbs and Common English phrases
- •13.1. Phrasal Verbs
- •13.2. Common English Phrases
- •Lecture 14: Slang as a Problem of Translation
- •14.1. Sociolinguistic Aspects of Slang
- •14.2. Primary and Secondary Slang
- •14.3. Individual Psychology of Slang
- •Lecture 15:Extra-linguistic Factor (Background Knowledge)
- •Lecture 16: Translation on the Level of Phonemes
- •16.1. Original English Names on the Map of the usa
- •16.2. Influence of Indian Names
- •16.3. The Dutch Place-names in the United States
- •16.4. French Place-names
- •16.5. Spanish Place-names
- •16.6. Telescope Coinages on the Map of the usa
- •16.7. Ways of Translating European Geographical Names
- •16.8. Latin in the Names of Canadian towns
- •16.9. Names Including the Word “New”: Gender and Translation Issues
- •Lecture 17: replacements as a type of translational transformations
- •17.1. Replacing Word Forms
- •17.2. Replacing Parts of Speech
- •17.2.1. Pronominalization
- •17.2.2. Noun is transformed into Verb:
- •17.2.3. Adjective is transformed into Noun:
- •17.3. Replacements of the Sentence Members (Restructuring the Syntactical Structure of a Sentence)
- •17.4. Syntactical Replacements in a Compound Sentence
- •17.5. Replacement of a Main Sentence by a Subordinate One and Visa Versa
- •17.6. Replacement of Subordination by Coordination and Visa Versa
- •17.7. Replacement of Syndeton by Asyndeton
- •Lecture 18: Lexical Replacements
- •18.1. Concretization
- •18.2. Generalization
- •18.3. Replacement of Effect by Cause and Visa Versa
- •18.4. Antonymic Translation
- •Lecture 19. Lexical Replacements (continued)
- •19.1. Compensation
- •19.2. Addition as a Translation Problem
- •19.3. Omission as a Translation Problem
- •Lecture 20: Pragmatics of Translation
- •Lecture 21: Lexical Problems of translation
- •21.1. Handling Context-bound Words
- •21.2. Handling Equivalent-lacking Words
- •Lecture 22: Handling Translator’s False Friends
- •Lecture 23: Collocational Aspects of Translation
- •23.1. Handling Attributive Groups
- •23.2. Phrasal Units as a Problem of Translation
- •Lecture 24: Stylistic Aspects of translation
- •24.1. Stylistically-marked Language Units
- •24.3. Handling Stylistic Devices
- •Literature
16.6. Telescope Coinages on the Map of the usa
Many American place-names are purely arbitrary coinages. Towns on the border between two states, or near the border, are often given names made of parts of the names of the two states, e. g., Pen-Mar (Pennsylvania+Maryland), Mar-Del (Maryland+ Delaware), Texarkana (Texas+Arkansas), Kanorado (Kansas+Colorado), Tex-homa (Texas+Oklahoma), Dakoming (Dakota + Wyoming), Texico (Texas+New Mexico), Calexico (California+Mexico). Norlina is a telescope form of North Carolina. Ohiowa (Neb.) was named by settlers who came partly from Ohio and partly from Iowa. Penn Yan (N. Y.) was named by Pennsylvanians and New Englanders, i. e., Yankees. Colwich (Kansas) is a telescope form of the name of the Colorado and Wichita Railroad. There are two Delmars in the United States. The name of one is a blend of Delaware and Maryland; the name of the other (in Iowa) was “made by using the names (i.e., the initials of the names) of six women who accompanied an excursion that opened the railroad from Clinton, Iowa.” In the same state Le Mars got its name in exactly the same way. Benld (Ill.) is a collision form of Benjamin L. Dorsey, the name of a local magnifico; Cadams (Neb.) is a collision form of C. Adams; Wascott (Wis.) derives from W. A. Scott; Eleroy (Ill.) from E. Leroy; Bucoda (Wash.) is a blend of Buckley, Collier and Davis; Gilsum (N. H.) is a blend of Gilbert and Sumner: Paragould (Ark.) is a blend of W.J. Paramore and Jay Gould: Marenisco (Mich.) is named after Mary Relief Niles Scott; Miloma (Minn.) derives its name from the first syllable of Milwaukee, in the name of the Milwaukee, Chicago, Minneapolis & St. Paul Railroad, and the first two syllables of Omaha, in the name of the Chicago, Minneapolis & Omaha Railroad; Gerled (Iowa) is a blend of Germanic and Ledyard, the names of two nearby townships; Rolyat (Ore.) is simply Taylor spelled backward; Biltmore (N. C.) is the last syllable of Vanderbilt plus the Gaelic Grundwort, more.
The Geographic Board, in its laudable effort to simplify American nomenclature, has played ducks and drakes with some of the most picturesque names on the national map. Now and then, as in the case of Purgatoire, it has temporarily departed from this policy, but in the main its influence has been thrown against the fine old French and Spanish names, and against the more piquant native names no less. Thus, we find it deciding against Portage des Flacons and in favor of the hideous Bottle portage, against Cañada del Burro and in favor of Burro canyon, against Cañonsy Ylas de la Cruz and in favor of the barbarous Cruz island. In Bong re landing and Cañon City it has deleted the accents. The name of the De Grasse river has been changed into Grass. De Laux - into the intolerable Dlo. And, as we have seen, it has steadily amalgamated French and Spanish articles with their nouns, thus achieving such barbarous forms as Duchesne, Eldorado, Deleon and Laharpe. But here its policy is fortunately inconsistent, and so a number of fine old names have escaped. Thus, it has decided in favor of Bon Secours and against Bonsecoun, and in favor of De Soto, La Crosse and La Moure, and against Desoto, Lacrosse and Lamoure. Here its decisions are confused and often unintelligible. Why Laporte, Pa., and La Porte, Iowa? Why Lagrange, Ind., and La Grange, Ky.? Here it would seem to be yielding a great deal too much to local usage.
