Vocabulary

Hindrance – помеха, препятствие

To repel – отражать (нападение)

To foresee – предвидеть

Arrangement – распределение

Axis – ось

Mold – (зд.) плесень

To penetrate – проникать

The senses – органы чувств

Patron – покровитель, клиент, заказчик

Meeting-house – молитвенный дом

Aisle – боковой неф

Chapel – часовня

Crypt – склеп

Sacristy – ризница

Ambulatory – крытая внутренняя галерея

Commodity – предметы потребления, товары

Abundant – имеющийся в изобилии, обильный

Design criteria

When the basic theory of static equilibrium for forces acting in any direction was first applied in structural design in the second half of the 18th century, the criterion of a safe design seemed obvious enough. The structure would be safe if it could support its own weight, and perhaps the weight of a wagon passing over it, or of machinery on a floor, without overloading any crucial element — arch rib, beam, column, masonry pier, or tie rod. The strength of these elements could be assessed by loading specimens to failure, or by similarly loading specimens of the material if the strength of the element could then be estimated by simple proportion. For greater safety, some factor would be allowed on the measured or estimated strengths.

During the 19th century, loads other than the weight of the structure itself became more important. The development of elastic theories of the behavior of the main structural elements and some complete structural systems called for further criteria to bypass the reliance on strength tests of these elements and systems. Tests were made to determine both wind loads and the effective loads imposed by moving locomotives, but the data obtained remained of limited and somewhat questionable validity for want of adequate understanding of the nature of these dynamic loads.

In the first half of the 20th century, design criteria for particular classes of structure — like steel frames and reinforced-concrete frames — were progressively codified for normal design in terms of design loads and allowable stresses.

In the last few decades, far more again has been learned about likely loads, particularly wind loads and earthquake shocks.

Vocabulary

equilibrium — равновесие

obvious — вероятный, очевидный

wagon — тележка, повозка, фургон

masonry pier — каменный столб

tie — растянутый элемент

rod — стержень, прут, брус

specimen — образец

to failure — повредить

to estimate — оценивать

to allow — допускать, разрешать

to bypass — обходить, окружать, окаймлять

reliance — уверенность; опора frame — остов; каркас

ARCHES

Throughout most of architectural history, the arch has been the chief means of overcoming the spanning limitations of single blocks of stone or lengths of timber.

There were three types of arches in ancient architecture. One, which survives today in Mycenean cyclopean construction, consisted of only three rough blocks of stone, the central one somewhat larger than the gap between the other two and wedged between them. A second, of which monumental examples survive in Egypt from the 3^rd millennium ВС, consisted of only two long blocks inclined toward one another as an inverted V-shape. This form was probably constructed even earlier in timber. The third, of which surviving examples are very widespread, was what is commonly known as the false or corbeled arch.

None of these early forms was very efficient. Spans rarely exceeded 6 ft. 6 in. (2 m). The spanning of substantially wider gaps called for true arches constructed on centering from large number of bricks or stone voussoirs. Small true brick arches appeared first in Mesopotamia and Egypt.

From the first century AD the Romans began to use concrete in place of cut stone for all the longer spans.

Later brick and stone arches departed from Roman precedents mainly in adoption of other profiles. Of these, the most important were the pointed profiles of most Islamic and of Gothic arches. The Islamic form appeared first and was preceded by a Sassanian form of roughly parabolic profile. The chief merit of the pointed profile was probably the ease with which it could be used in ribbed vaults of any plan shape and, without aesthetic inconsistency, throughout structures that vaulted in this way.

Early cast-iron arches of the late 18th and early 19^th centuries all closely resembled braced timber arches. Later steel and reinforced-concrete arches have usually been given the necessary stiffness simply by the adoption of an I-shaped, boxlike, or tubular cross section.