Topic 56 Arts or environment?

Frankly speaking, both arts and environment are important to human being.

However, if I were the CEO of a company, I would rather give the money to

protect the environment than to support the arts. Because environment

protection is quite urgent and matters the future of our globe, while arts is a

continuous process to improve the quality of life.

First of all, environment protection is very urgent. Global warming is becoming

more and more serious. Many spices are dying, the ice in South Pole is melting,

and many rivers are being contaminated. Now it is time for us to do something

to save our earth and our own future.

Secondly, environment protection is very important for all, including human

being, plants, animals and the Earth. When I was a little boy, I often played in

the river that is located beside my village. The water was so clean that we could

just drink it directly. There were also many kinds of fishes in the river. It was

such a beautiful place that I often played for a whole day. Now things are

totally different, the water became brown in color due to pollution from

factories, very few fishes can live there. Those small children can never enjoy

the fun that I once did.

Thirdly, the art is a continuous process to improve the quality of life, which is

not as urgent as environment protection. In addition, there are many ways by

which funds can be raised for arts, such as exhibitions and auctions of artistic

works. Environment protection needs money more urgently than arts do.

Although both arts and the environment are important, I prefer to give the

money to support environment protection, due to the three reasons mentioned

above.

Topic 56 Arts or environment?

Guan zhong, the ancient Chinese politician, once said that people would know rites and courtesy only after their granaries were full. By this he meant that people would first try to improve their living conditions before they could engage in any artistic activities or improve their behaviours. The environment is closely related to people's living conditions. If a company is going to do something for the people, I would recommend it to give the money to protect the environment.

With the rapid economic development in recent years, China is now facing very serious environmental problems. According some news reports, Yellow River, the "Mother River" of the Chinese nation that nurtured generations of Chinese people over the past thousands of years, has been polluted by industrial wastes and has much less stream of water at present than in previous times, which has imposed great problems on the life and work of the people living along the banks. What these people urgently need is not artistic works hanging on the walls for enjoyment but rather clean water for their daily use.

In some areas in China, though people are much wealthier than before, they live in a much worse environment due to their negligence of environmental protection in the process of developing the economy. Several years ago, I went to a small town in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, to visit some of the chemical

plants there that have business connections with our company. The town was

surrounded by green mountains and there was a river running across it. What

surprised me was that the chemical plants there had adopted no measures to

protect the environment. Due to the chemical wastes discharged without any

treatment, the river turned into a blue colour and the mountains looked like

men's faces with scars on them. I wondered that even though the local people

had earned enough money, would their life be happy in such a polluted

environment?

China is still a developing country now. A large proportion of the population is

still leading a poor life. Even in those areas where the economy has developed

to a high level, the people have to face the environmental problems that

sometimes are detrimental to their health. I think we can benefit more from

investing money into environmental protection than imputing it in artistic

activities.