- •Lecture 1.1 General Problems of Style and Stylistics
- •Lecture 1.2 Modern English from the Viewpoint of Syntagmatic Stylistics
- •Interrelations among different word strata:
- •Legend:
- •Norm in Stylistics. Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Stylistics
- •Neutrality and Norm in Stylistics
- •Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Stylistics
- •Module II. Lexical Expressive Means and Devices (Figures of Thought) Lecture 2.1 Types of Meaning in an Utterance. Devices Based on the Interaction of Logical and Contextual Meanings
- •Devices Based on the Interaction of Logical and Contextual Meanings
- •Devices Based on the Interaction of Logical and Emotive Meanings
- •Lecture 2.3 Devices Based on the Interaction of Primary and Derivative Logical Meanings. Devices Giving Additional Characteristics to the Objects Described
- •Devices Giving Additional Characteristics to the Objects Described
- •Lecture 2.4 Stylistic Use of Set Expressions and Allusions. Stylistic Use Of Synonyms
- •Stylistic use of Proverbs and Sayings
- •Stylistic Use of Synonyms
- •Module III. Syntactical Stylistic Means and Devices (Figures of Speech) Lecture 3.1 Inversion. Detachment. Ellipsis. Aposiopesis. Parallelism. Chiasmus. Apochoinu
- •Lecture 3.2 Suspense. Rhetorical Question. Suspense. Rhetorical Question. Repetitions. Tautological Subject. Climax. Anticlimax. Antithesis
- •Module IV. Phonetic Expressive Means and Stylistic Devices Lecture 4.1 Euphony. Alliteration. Assonance. Onomatopoeia. Onomatopoeia. Metre. Rhythm. Rhyme
- •Module V. Functional Styles of the English Language Lecture 5.1 The Notion of a Functional Style. Scientific Prose Style. The Style of Official Documents
- •Lecture 5.2 Publicistic Style. The Style of Newspapers. Belle-Lettre
Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Stylistics
A paradigm is a set of grammar forms of this or that part of speech, each of such form being naturally selected in the speech process. The notion of a syntagma is employed in both phonetics and syntax and denotes a combination of words in speech, a linear sequence of lexical units.
The term paradigmatics, mostly used by Russian linguists, denotes the totality of units the language has at its disposal. The term syntagmatics also implies to a totality but this time the sequences or chains of units. Both paradigmatics and syntagmatics are interconnected in reality supporting each other and representing necessary condition for each other’s existence. What would a paradigm of units be without a knowledge of how they are combined in syntagmata? It would be useless and meaningless. The meaning of a unit is known due to the knowledge of its distribution. The same way what would a syntagma be without its place in the paradigm? For stylistics strict delimitation of these both is of principal importance. Thus when we use the word guy instead of man or the form ain’t instead of am/is/are not the combination real good instead of really good, the sentence John here? instead of Is John here? it means one unit used instead of another which could be but isn’t employed on purpose. It’s what shows the paradigmatic branch of stylistics: the paradigmatic choice between the stylistically marked and stylistically neutral units. Another example is the utterance I ask you, I pray, I beseech. Here it is not the words or their meanings that are of stylistic interest but the number of their manifestations (3) and the relations between their meanings: pray is stronger than ask and beseech is the strongest synonym. In combinations like life and death, now or never there is also a definite play of meanings, this time based upon contrast. There are also examples of contrastive meanings within one phrase like love and hate, sweet torture, etc. Such correlations between the meanings of words in single combinations make the object of studies of syntagmatic stylistics. Thus there is stylistics of units named paradigmatic stylistics and stylistics of sequences names syntagmatic stylistics. The former studies separate words, groups, while the latter studies their combinations. That is stylistic units. Paradigmatic stylistics is concentrated upon the choice between the stylistically marked and stylistically neutral units. Syntagmatic stylistics is focused upon the correlations between the meanings of words which stand together.
Literature
Galperin I.R. Stylistics. – Moscow, 1991.
Skrebnev Yu.M. Fundamentals of English Stylistics. – Moscow, 1994.
Enkvist, N.E. Linguistic Stylistics. – The Hague, 1973.
Esser, J. English Linguistic Stylistics. – Tübingen, 1993.
Wales, K. A Dictionary of Stylistics. – London, 1990.
Арнольд И.В. Стилистика современного английского языка (Стилистика декодирования). – М., 1990.
Балли Ш. Французская стилистика. – М., 1961.
Стилистический энциклопедический словарь русского языка / Под ред. М.Н. Кожиной. – М., 2003.
Progress Check on Module I.
To pass this progress check, the student has to give answers to 10 questions. Each correct answer shall be evaluated in 10 points. The total of all correct answers shall then make 100 points.
Questions:
What position does linguostylistics occupy among other branches of general linguistics?
What is the difference between linguistic stylistics and literary stylistics?
What is the difference between the bookish literary language and the colloquial literary language?
What is the difference between an expressive means and a stylistic device?
Give the general characteristics of the stylistic diversity of the modern English vocabulary.
What kinds of old words do you know?
What is the place and stylistic value of terminology among other lexical strata?
What types of meaning of utterance are considered relevant in stylistics?
How can different types of meaning interact within a single utterance?
What is the possible result of the above interaction of meanings?
Topics for Essays
Development of Stylistics as a Separate Linguistic Branch
Schools in Linguostylistics
Russian Schools in Linguostylistics
Various Theories of Style
Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Stylistics: the Need to Discriminate between Them
Topics for Independent Individual Work
Types of language units stylistics deals with.
Sub-branches of general stylistics.
Links of linguostylistics with phonetics.
Links of linguostylistics with lexicology.
Links of linguostylistics with syntax.
Stylistics and semasiology.
Stylistics and onomaseology.
Stylistics and sociolinguistics.